The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992-12-22 Correspondence 'Fown of Nortb Andover 5 { r iiF 5 Office of the Planning Department - Community Development and Services Division 400 Osgood Street North Andc)ver, Mw;saQhkisetls 01 45 'I'o%"I Planner- hl.tp:fhvww.towiiofnoilhandoy.e.r.com P 7 88- ;5 Lincoln Daley F(978)688-9f42 Gregory Smith, AlA G91) Associates, LLC 148 Main Street, Buildiiig A Noilh.Andover, A 01845 June 2.3,2005 MI-, 1-00lx: 1 am of the understa€iding that you are currcntIy Iiavirig a di on a legal settlernent regarding the, ability for one side to negotiate a change.to complete a scope of work that &-viaics From €lie langtjage acid coudi ions slipulaled hi the Site Plan Special Pennit issued hi 1993. 'l he Purpose of this letter is to providc clarity in ou ining the regulatory pmct�ss iUivolving site plan review. Below please find the relevant scetions of flit Bylaw pertaining to 4iangc;,0nodl I ICatic)rrs to an approved site plan. i'ri v�y Bylaw Section 8.3(4) Prmedures a) The site plan approved by the Plamiing 13oaid becomes the official dcvclopirient pIa€i for a site within the Towrr of N orth Andover- Tciwn penni[s ire tu-d or withheld based upon compliance witfi the approved site plaid. I lie approved site plain is IcgaI ly hindirig and can c)rlly be uhallgt cd c11-udj Usted i�I [unipliamt: with. the 1 revisions coiitaiiled in Subsection 5,3(8) ReAsions to Approved Site Plans, Town Bylaw SediGn 8.3(8) -Revisions to Approved Site Plait a) Any rcvisions to a develclpn enI tidal 13a,. recurred site plan 4pproval shalI be, s€€bmjtled to the Town Plarmer for review. No revisions shall be approved until the Town 13Iaa€ior reeeivcs three (3) oopic,,� of the reprised plan and the revi,�ions placed (in the pLl rk fall into the following eategories: i) A change, of location and layout of any parking area(s), signs, storage or ac:cessclry buiIdings, Provided that.no Town Bylaws are violated by the change; ii) 'l lie change in the propcjsed landscaping Man which cities not violate auy Tovai Bylaw; iii) A change of egress and ingress provided the same is in compliance with 'Fawn Bylaws and the reciuirtmiemts of'the C ommun ealth. b) The revisions cited above may be completed without further review by PIanning Board, apon approv4l by the Towii Planner, Tht,To%vn Plainier may that the revisions as shown do trot fall rote) the eategories(>utl3ned in this arh odon, and that die pmpoj it!d revisions axe in .#act substantial and call for materially differeat site plait thwi approved by the Planning 20ARJ)chi'Ar'3'FA 08-951r HkII1.1)rN(j 68,l-!r,545 VATION OU-953U NFAIeTH 0M-9540 PLA KM N U 4M-953 5 Town of North Andover p �ytiao � Office of the Building Department �� •ti°°' `*` � Co m mij n ity Development and Services D.jvision } - 27 Charles Street i forth AvfJovt--T-, W"aehu_S;etFS D_ 1 € hpTt Nic(Ata Teli-phone (978) 688-9545 Evilding Fax (978)688-9542 July 13, 2002 Mark J. Sanipson, Fsore Dtvine, Millima&.Branch Pr<Assionnl Association, Attorneys At Law 300 Bri&stone Square PC Box 39 Andover, MA 01810 RE, 148 Alain Stri yet, Suilding"A„ -No4h Andover, MA Dear Atty, Sampson: Ymm correvcndence of June 18, 2002 reg0csts eMforc ent as it relates to the Sutton Pond Cmdomiruun, Property obligation to replace and maintain sewer pumps as rewired by Condition No, 9(c)in a Special Permit dated November 17, 1992 and fovised November 30, 199 (Exhibit A). Exhibit A, is the Pl2trming Board NOTE E OF DECISION with dues of hearing. December 1 and 15, 1992 and a Town Clerk de6aion date statlmp of:Deaembor 22, 1992. Tho November 17 and November 30,19 2 dates, I believe, are inva3id- Hovmvver, Special Permit C.on&tion No. 9(c), (Exhibit`°A" states_ "Tho exi sting puanping station adYacent to the mice h 0ding will be demolished. The applicant will install an in&viidunl grinder-eje ar pimap to the lift stab on at the courtyard loc�rdm_" The condition states that the Pump house will be demjaHshe 7 f am of the opinion that it dve�not state it co d not be built again. l caimot determine, by your docrunWation,if thr,grfiAcr-ejector pt=p had Wen installed m tho past, It was also stated in your Panigaph 4(Sped al Peamit Condition o- (c)) "Furthermore, Sutton is required to repair, replace and nisirrtain all utilities within its cotrrmon arras-" f cam at find sncb statement in Spedal PenA t Condition o- 9, 1 am..of the opinion that the docwnentati on as submitted, (no plan was attached as mentioned ia your correspondence), does not consttute a valid claim or demonstrate that the Special Per it Con& in,i No. 9 lh1d not been accnnrplished Pan.g�aph 7 of your ooirresponimce states in part"the discharge of raw sewage con.0 t (1)a violin on of Ole Wetlands PrOechon Act due to its proximity within 100' of a vA and resource area, namOy Osgood Pond and io tijbutaries and( a vAoiatfon of the Board of Health Regulations relating to the proper discba *+e ttnd haiull ing of sewerage wastes-" Pursuant to your letter of,liuiol801 "Ors or abm t April 24 2002,the pinups filed again causr ig discharge of s%vage.-l nin ofthe opinion that the primary responsibility of your clients, Trustees of the Stone Dill Realty Trust, was to nOify and request the Conservation Commission and the Board of NmMi to observe the m sito sewage violation,that had o=urred approximatel y one mamth eadler- {1:LR 1 OF;1F'FY_'_"I-S 6U-9)541 BUILDIN. 63 6S,�-9S 45 Atty- Sampson July 13,, 2002 P'age,2 It i S (fiffiCUIt to attcmpt to enfbrce a c4andifion that has not been obscr%redandapproximAtely ten the wttland resorurco and health viobti*' s)rcqWred the immechate awntion of the Conservation and Health dVarunents,vAio have junscfi clion on the of abons.. Thank you for your path ce vviii1e.the matter was ixi&-jilvestiption. yotirs tn�y' D, RoWd NicetW Builchng Comaiissionor CC:Heich Griffin, Director C.D&S Mie Pai-dno, Conservation Administrator Sandra Starr, Health Admiru strator Clad.MA&4 Interim Tbiw Planner, CERTIFIED MAM RETURN RECEIPT RED UESTED #7000 0520,0021 5970,9801.