HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-24-1988 1077 OSGOOD ST - Angus Realty v. NA Planning Board EATON &'CHANDL�ER, P.,C.
ATIQRWVS AT LAW
234 ESSEX 51 RE��T
LAWRIENCE,MA SSACHUSET T5 101 BAU E�TAI!LJSHF0 �89e
JAMES tt EATON.111 FRED,1-1.EATON IR97-1;v95 ifflr.'.Fj
ROBEFIT.J.O'SULLIVAN T ELEPHONE161 I M"a 2R R M OMMM ER QqU 19Y40
hAARK A MWOMTKY,JH,,, JAMES H.EATON ry 926,-1 WZ mLzml
C. RVAN BOCKUEY J.ALBERT ER ADLFY 194 e.,,I SB5 CRET3
,R)kN C.OAKLEY
0 CMUNSEU
ASSOMATEI: RMERT V OMMWAN
GREGGRY N.E!ATUN May 24 , 1988.
Mr . Daniel Long
Town Clerk
120 Main Street
z
North Andover , Mass . 01845
r-U7
CD
Re: Angus Realty Trust V . North Andover Planning
Board and the ToWn Of North Andover
Land Court No i3 AM
G=X
Dear Mr . Long;
Enclosed herewith is a copy of the Complaint which has been
filed in the Land Court by Angus Realty Trust seeking judicial,
review of the decision of the North Andover Planning Board filed,
with your office on May 4 , 1988 . The Town of North Andover is
also named as a defendant as Angus Realty Trust is also contesting
the validity of Section 10 . 31 as it applies to Site Plan Special
Permits under Sec . 8 .3 of the Zoning By-law and seeking a
declaratory judgment concerning Special Permit No . 39-85 granted
to Angus Realty Trust by the zoning Board of Appeals on
September 24 , 1985 .
This action affects the property situated at 1077 Osgood
Street , North Andover , Mass .
This notice is served upon you pursuant to the requirements
of General Laws , Chapter 40A, section 17 .
very truly yours ,
Robert J . Sullivan ,
Attorney or Angus Realty Trust
Receipt of the original of this letter , along with a copy of
the Complaint in the case of Angus Realty Trust V . North Andover
Planning Board and the Town of North Andover U hereby,
acknowledged this .1 ,11' day of May, 1988 .
COMMOtIWEALTH OF MASSIICHUSETTS
LAND COURT
ES EX , SS . CIVIL ACTION O.
128142
Angus Realty Corporatioplan,
ntiff
* C:OMPLAINT FOR UDICIAL
VS REVIEW OF ZONING DECISICI�
L.
* FOR A DETERMINATION 4F
Paul A. Hedatrom, John ALYDTTY OF Z0__AT G —
Simons, Erich W. NitZsche * ORDINAL# L AND FOR
Michael Lcary r and George * DECLARATORY JUDGN9Et+T
Perna, in them' capacity as �
Cbaiaeman and Members
respectively of the North
Andover Planning Board and the #
Town of North Andover,
efondants
NATURE OIL THE ASL:
1 . This is axl appeai of a zoning decislandOfathrePuestir�€orBoard
of the Town of North Andover, i
determination of the validity of a Zoning icy-Law of the Town
of North Andover . The Plaintiff ks also seeking a
d(-_olaratory judgment declaring that a Special Permit: granted
to the Plaintiff by the Town of North Andover Zoning Hoard
zes
of Appeals in a Petition
n squa�e�fee� �-85 wtwoh storyorstructu�re
construction
remains in full force and eff8ct.
jU1gSDIC'r10N
2 . This Court has il7 ,tion Of Chapt��t24� , action pursuant
tChapt��'
�hChapter �r0A, Sec .
231A.
PARTIES
3 . The plaintiff , Angkis Realty CorPoraticr" is a New €iampshire-
corporation having a place of busines:� at 1077 Osgood
Street, worth Andover , Massachusetts.
4 . The Defendants , Paul A . fiedatrom, John L_ Sin'Ons , Eric-h w.
Nitzsche , Michael Leary and George Perna, are the Chairman
and members respectively of the North Andover Planning
Board , and reside in North Andover as follows :
T1-K)MA5 .0 Ai:FREY Paul L . Hedstr= John L. Simons
ATTORNrY A Y LAW.P C. 30 oakos Drive 10 Royal Crest - Apt: 3
300 FS��STFICFT North Andover , MA. 0 1 b 4 5 North Andover, MA. 01845
LAWFtE11'L_E_MA 0184Z
67 7 E.9 -6151
Erich W. Nitzsche Michael Leary
1253 Salem Street 57 L:ssex Street
North Andover, MA. 01845 North Andover , MA . 01945
George Piefna
280 Faznham Street
North Andover, MA . 01845
i
S . The Defendant , ` own of North Andover , i5 a municipal �
cclrportien, organized under the lags of the Ooiantonwcalth of
massachusetts , with a usual place of business at 120 Haig
Street, North Andover, Essex County, Massachusetts .
COUNT I '
(REVIEW OF ZONING DECISION)
6 . The Plaintiff owns a parcel of land located at 1077 Osgood
Street, at the intersection} of {great Pored Road in North �
Andover, Massachusetts , containing approximately 9 . 2 acres . R
The premises affected by this appeal are in zoning districts
General Busine$s (G-B) and Business-2 (B-2 ) and comprise an
area of approximately 5 . 3 acre: . The balance of Plaintiff ' s
land is zoned residence- ( R- ) and is not part of the site
for which site plan approval .is sought .
a
7 . On January 15 , 1988 the Plaintiff filed an application .for a �
Special Permit with ' the 'down clerk and the Planning Board
seeking site plan approval under ectio�i 8 . 3 of the zoning
by-law. A copy of the Application is attached hereto and ;
marked "A" . Sections 10 . 3 and 10 . 31 of the by-law set forth
the pertinu[, lt provisions for Special Permits and establish
the Planning Board as the Special Permit Granting Authority .
No distinctiorn is made between a Site Plate Review special
permit and other special. permits . The Planning Beard never
adopted rules relative to the .issuance of such permits, and
never filed a copy of such rules in the office of the Towrk
Clerk . The Plaintiff ' s application included plans for the
construction of a 320 foot by 128 foot two story retail-
office building on the 5 . 3 acres of business-zoned land.
The Planning Board gave notice to all interested parties ( by
publication, and certified mail } that a public hearing would
be }geld on Thursday, February 4 , 1988 at 8 : 30 p .m. in the
'town Offioe, Selectman' s Meeting Root. On the evening of
February 4 , 1988 , the hearing was postponed by the Planning
Board for lack of a quorum and re-scheduled by posting to
February B , 1988 at 7 : 30 p.m.
8 . At the February 8 , 1988 meeting , the Planning Board opened
the Flaintiffks public hearing and received information from
the Plaintiff and from certain interested parties . The
fHOMA 5 F.C AFFFIF V Defendants , Hedstrom, Nitzche, Simons and Perna were prescrit
3T MRNEY AT LAW,r'.C. and participated in the: Meeting. Another inember, John J .
3WES E:XSF4ULLS Rorke, was present and participated in the meeting, but is
LA4vA£HCF=,MA 01E42 .
4Sk7 G&C-G r 51
L
y
no longer a mother of the planning Board and is not named as
a Defendant kerein. After extensive discussion, the public
hearing was continued by the Board to March 2 , 1988 .
on march 2 , 1988 the Planning Board resutned the public
hearing. The Defendants, Hedstrom, Nitzche, Simons alld Perna
were present and participated in the meeting, receiving
additional information from the plaintiff and from -certain
interested parts s . Member Burke was ah!�ent. After
extensive discussion, the Board voted to Qonduct a site
visit before the next meeting and to continue the public
hearing to April 14 , 1988 .
g , on Saturday, March 19 , 1988 , Defendants Nitzche aid Simons
met representatives of the Plaintiff at the site and
oonductec a site visit . Present on be
of tite Plaintiff
were : George Nammour ,R Archibald D . Mar-lar'en R and paniela
Y tmeen. After touring the site , Defendant Simons said to
George armour in the presence of Archibald Maelare)}, and
Pamela `.(anieen, that he would vote favorably for the site
pi.an only if the building were r[koved to the front of the lot
with parking to the Fear, it ( the building was recuood in
size , the c} terior was changed from
dri c to clapboard, and
roof changed from flat to p
e
10 . n March 3 , 988 z e�r�ber Burke resigned from the Planning
Board .
�ii.ohael teary
On April 11 , 1988 Defendant joined the
PlanningBoard as a member .
li . onpr11 l4 , 1988 R the Planning 80aTd resumed the public
k3earing . Fite Defendants , Hedstrom, i.ttcber Sirixonsr Perna,
and Leary were present and participated in the �neeti� c
receiving additional j formati.on from the plaintiff and from
certain interested part.i.es . The Board tten +otedo close
the public hearing and to take the matter under advisement .
on April 28 , 1988 at a public meeting, the Board voted to
dewy the plaintiff ' s application for a Special Permit.
Defendants HedstrOm, Nitzche and Simons voted to deny the
application. The Defendant , Leary, who had not been a Board
member a1 the time of the two earlier public hearing
sessions, abstained. The Defendant, George Perna, was not
present and did not vote. i
i. on May , 1988 the Hoard filed its written decision with the ;
Town Clerk. A ertxfied Dopy of the Planning Board' s
decision is attached hereto and marked "B" . The ]decision is i.
totally UjIsigned and refers to a "Date 0 i1
Hearing"2 , 1 of April
1R 1988 . o jtearing took place on Apr
l 988 . Notice
of the decision was not stalled to the Plaintiff until May
1. 3 , 1988 and was not. received by plaintiff until May � BR
y'i{ MAS F.CAFFREY 1988 .
A7TO9NF-V AT Caw.F.C.
300 ESSE A STREE]
LAWRENCC_MA 0I84?
8f7 6*&-57•J7
13 , Thp Plaintiff; is a person aggrieved, within the meaning of
G .L . C . 40A , section 17 , b the decision of the Planning
Board to deny its application fox a Special Permit.
14 . The Planning Board members present on April 28 , 1988 aQt-ed
without a quorum present and lacked jurisdiction to decide
tht Plaintiff ' s application at that meeting .
15 . The plar "09 50ard failed to take final action upon the
Plaintiff ' s application fox a special permit within 90 days
f011owing the date of public hearing .
J-6 . The decision of the Planning Board to deny the Plaintiff ' s
application for a Special, Permit exceeded the authority of
the Planning Board.
17 . The Planning ]hoard ' s decision is based on legally untenable
grounds and is unreasonably, whimsical, capricious or
arbitrary.
18 . WHEREFORE, the plaintiff respectfully prays that the Court :
A . Hear all pertinent evidence and determine the facts .
B . Determine and adjudge that the Planing Board' sc vision to deny the Plaintiff ' s application for a
Special Permit was in error as a matter of law and fact
and that the Planning Board exceeded its authority-
C:_ Annul the May 4 , 19 8 , decision of the Planning Board .
D , Determine and adjudge that the Plaintiff ' s applicatio,
for a Special Permit was constructively granted under
section 10 , 31-5 of the by-law and G.L. Chapter 40A,
section 9 .
i
Grant such further relief as justice and the rights of �
the parties may require ,
COUNT 11
(DI`.TE MINATION OF VALIDITY OF ZONING BY-LAW)
i
19 . Tho Plaintiff, pursuant to G.L . C. 240, sec. 14A, requests
that the Court determine the validity of Section 10 . 31 of
the Worth Andover Wring By-Law as this section applies to 3
Site Plan Special Permits under Section 8 . 3 .
20 . The Defendants, Paul A. hadstrom, John L. SiMonS, Erich W.
Nityschc, Michael Leary and George Perna , ire their capacity i
�6tdla JSrFRE*.' as mcmbers of the North Andover Planning Board , are: granted
Tod{n�Y AT{.nw_�.{. the authority under Section 8 . 3 of the Wing BY-Law to
: issue Site Plan Special Permits .
?QQ£55ex STRF.E T
aWPPNC£.MA 846.12
i
6F1EALfiiSL iIII}
k
I
1
i
21 . Section 10 . 31 of the North Indover By- Lay, a copy of which
attached p p /� �y y� requi"es that certain yyy {�p i
is hereto as 1-1K �t• YF�4Y r cart 1. e
findings must he made before a gpecial permit
approved and it also c�s�powcrs the Special heeMrOvalaofina
Authority to attach certain conditions to t
special permit.
22 . The Provisions of Section 10 . 31 as they MAY to Site plan s
Special Permits under Section B • 3 wer delegated totute an ptheerTown
1.
and
police pcwe �
unlawful &Kercise of the p orts to condition
of North Andover because Section 10 . 31 ppel sior�s of tie By
�
a use allowed as
�of ant ofga� it�c�'lan��Speer �ro�al Permit key the
law, on the '�
Planning Board_
3 . The provisions of Section 10 . 31. , as they apply to Site Piar>
e of the
Special. Pez� " Under ect�to thew exceed Gh�,as hapter 40 ,
delegation of power granted to the �oppliwn ed is therefore
secs 9 and the by-law as so applied
unconstitutional , null and void .
24 . An actual controversy
exists between the
plaintiff and �
Defendants in that. the dofendaltite de Bedwho e the bePlaintiffrs Of ' s
North Andover planning Board have
ased
application for a Site PlanSpecial mu}st'�be it bde iedo�lftY�tho
erroneous
belief that the perm
Conci�t ano set forth in Section 10 a 31 , l t a-e) were net met. 5
Mess granted the r ljef sought herein, Plaintiff v '11
, . Clnl 9 b the application of Section
suffer irreparable injury Y ocial Permit, for
10 . 31. to its request for a Site Plan Sp
which the plaintiff has no adequate legal reedy.
26 . 1 } );g{}ftL, the Plaintiff respectfully prays that the Court ;
ver th Zoning
the No
A. Declare that Section 10 , 3� f A asrit applies to the
By-law is invalid , null and vo
Site Plan an
Section
permit required u B . 3 of
the By-law .
A nal the decision of the North Ando�xe�opl�n�Site jng Board
B . lication
denying t,hc plai� tl ff ' s application
of the Site Plan
special permit and order the app
pedal permit subject to such reasonable conditions as
the Board might impose .
Ca For such other relief as justice and the rights of the
parties may require .
THOMAS F.CAFFREY
A TCMP,rF.a AT iAW.P.C.
3Do ESSUy ST IaEET
L0,WR[NCE_rJA 61842
M7 K"W51
COUNT III
(DECLARATORY JUDGMENT CONCERNING SPECIAL PERMIT N . 39-85 )
27 . On or about May 21 , 1985 , the Plaixltiff filed an application
with the North Andover' laming Board of Appeals requesting a
9 ccial Permit under Section 4 , paragraph 4 . 133 ( d) of the
Zoning Fay-law, so as to permit construction of a retail -
office building within 2501 of Lake Caohichewick . The Board
of Appeals gave notice by publication and mailing and set
the matter down for a public hearing ork .pine 10 , 1985 at
7 ; 3O o ' clock p.m, at the Town Building. On June 10 , 1985
the Zoning Board of Appeals at a public hearing received
information from the Plaintiff and from various Town
Agencies and officials and from certain interested parties .
Tn particular, the Planning Board , by written memorandum,
rccornmended to the Zoning Board that the portion of tho
proposed building Within 250 " of the Lake be removed and the
building enlarged elsewhere. The Zorni.ng Board voted to
continue the pudic hearing to August 12 , 1985 .
28 . Oil August 12 , 19B5 the Zoning Board re=aumed thc: public
hearing and received further information from tj�a plaintiff,
various Town officials and agenc,ie8, and certain intcrested
Parties. At the conclusion of tjoe3 public hearing the Board
voted to grant the Special Permit and to authorize the
Building Irispcctor to issue a permit to the Plaintiff for
construction of the work sought ,used upon certain specific
conditions .
29 . On September 24 , 1985 the Zoning Board Filed its decision
With the `Powrn Clerk. A certified Dopy of said decision if�L
attached hereto aild marked " W' .
30 . Oil October 21 , 1985 a certified copy of the Zoning Board
decision was duly recorded at the North Essex Registry of
Deeds at Book 2064 , Page 155 .
31 . Condition 8 in the Zoning Boacd' s decision of septe}mber 24 ,
1985 provided. "8 - that the planq be revised and submitted
to and approved by the Board px-i.or to any constxcuction on
the site" .
32 . On February 10 , 1987 the Plaintiff at a public meeting of
the Zoning Board of Appeals sx�bmltted to the "Zoning Board
its revised plans for construotiOn at the zite . The: Zoning
Board voted to approve the revised plans and to sign the
revised site plan,
33 . Or' may 8 , 1987 the revised site plan, signed by foul- members
`HOMA5F.CAFFf9EV of the Board of Appeals, wa.9 recorded at the North Essex
1 7 VNA'E V l4T L n w, 'C.
Registry of Deeds as Plan 410699 . With the plan a certified
F
' 30(k ESSEX STRF.F'l copy of the Board of Appeals decision dated September 24 ,
�AWFii'nUe,MA oIAar
1985 was again recorded at the North Essen Registry of Deeds
¢17 -475L on May 8 , 1987 , at Buck 2489 , Page 188 .
34 . Can January 19 , 1988 at a public heai'inr ,, the Zoning Board of
Appeals voted to extend to September 24 , 1988 the
plaintiff ' s Special Permit dated September 24 , 1985 , a copy
of said vote is attached hereto and r.iarked "E" .
35 . The Defendants , Paul A . Hedstrom, ,loh;n L. Simons , Erich W.
Nitzsche and Michael Leary, in their cijpacjty as members of
the north Andover Planning Board, denied the Plaintiff ' s
application for a Site Plan Special Permit on May 4 , 1988
{ see copy of decision attached hereto and masked "B" ) .
36 . One of the reasons gi'vell by the Planning Board for denying
the plaintiff ' s application four a Site Plan Special Permit
was the following
"There is no evidence in the file, nor has the
applicant presented evidence at the public hearings
that there exists a special perDlit for construction
activity within the watershed district as contemplated
by the applicant in the application ). -fore us .
The Pla.�rnx)jg Board has no authority to approve a site
plan under a special permit application which on its
face does not comply with the present regulations
contained in the Zoning By-law. "
37 . The Planning Board has erroneously determiried that the
Spccz.al Permit granted by the zoning Board of Appeals ( No.
39-95 ) oa September 24 , 1985 , does not authorize the
construction activity withii-� the watershed district as shown
on the plan submitted by the Plaintiff with its application
for a Site Plan Special Permit.
38 . The Planning Board has also erroneously determined that the
site plan submitted by the Plaintiff with its application
for a Site Plan Special. Permit on its face does not comply
with the applicable regulations contained in the 'LOn jlg By
law.
39 . The Plaintiff says that the site plan submitted with its
application for a Site Plan Special Permit complies in all
respects with the applicable Zoning By--laws and the
construction activity shown on said plan is authorized by
the Special Permit granted to the Plaintiff on September 24 ,
1985 by the Zoning Board of }appeals ( see 11D11 ) .
40 . An actual and serious controversy has arisen between the
plaintiff and the Defendants t Paul A. Hedstram, John L.
j. ens , Erich W. Nitzsche and Michael Leary , in their
capacity az members of the NaEth Andover Planning Board ds
to the rights acquired by the Plaintiff by the Spoci.al
: 77t4M4AS F.CAFFREY Permit (No. 85-39 ) granted to it on September 24 , 1985 .
A7 TUNrvEY AT LAW.F.C.
3W ESSE#]7 FtEET
LAW FSENCI=.MA U F&Q
f,17 tsm,4151
#l . WHEREFORE, the plaintiff re Wcf£ully prays that the Cott ;
A . That declaratory judgment be entered in favor of the
Plaintiff declaring that Slevial permit No . 39-85
remains in full force and nffeu: a. " that said Special
permit authorized the construction activity within the
watershed district as shown on the plan Submitted by
the plaintiff with its application I . . a site plan
Special Permit , which includes the :onstrection of a
65, 861 square foot two story structure .
a . That the Court grant such further relief as justice and
the rights of the parties may require.
Angus Realty corporation
B .0
Robert J . ' Sullivaii
Caton & C andler, P.c.
234 Essex street
Lawrence. Ma, 01840
( 617 ) 685-5123
Tomas F. Ca -
Thomas F . Caffrey, P . c .
300 Essex street
Lawrence, MA . 01840 '
( 617 ) 686-6151
DATED; May 23 , 1988
,-MMAS F.CAPm
(T IOR*'e A TLAW.
{ �ES mxNmT
�LAWArNCE._0_;!
IV En
1iiLS tC1flJ�k:1°' 0 L41,OVER
PL.wou 13WM ry
JAN
Lf ICi�i� q i s apgliaatian "t lea #ypavrit#en iortk Andayert
107-1 (),,good Street. MA-
t An(JUR Realty C-orpoxatiori Addrosn
dpplioatiau, is hereby medo
#. r �;`•
- (Site Plan iteviewx
of iho Zoning $y-iaw.
{a) For.0 5}�coinl Pormit.-Hadar Saatian iB —� t Paragraph {
ldiil ic�n4=lsaro 177 Qsg4oC1 S#rRet.2.
{u} Prawioen tfeotad &ra lands eud bttii
/on the past side of Great Pond Raraid
Property with fronta.go on the Hortla South t
(b Premiaas afeatpd are prop Y
;(eat videf Os ood Strout, and kna}m
Fags - StToe#.
t!o 11277 os ood
'
} d{ t District sad the preminae affeot+
1AScsiu8Preminoa xitaota d
to afi, 26V+ f*at. "••
have an sreq gf23L 08*� (5.3A} Ln4 fron g - .
Hama $nd" o,ddr,ane of owaar if point' o ernhip, give a31 ndmee
Angus Realty Corporation
a arc , a y Stef anowi z Family Trust
Feb. 9, i484 Previous 6.mor b} Stella Sobel :-
!W0 of RUX10haeab k
N/A
applioant i w-aer� shook hie intereat in the prau�iaeo�
s ua o.
t Px•anpeotivo puschaaar
..Other (arplain)
geed ilciiug1 12a # front; k2�' f _foot doe#
4. Si9• of prop foot.
vaighti Ewa _ataries� _
(a) Approx#mato data of ereol .
0aou#unay or nn# (of o"h floor) first - retail ; second m office
' Sy 2-� Frith larick ve�leelC 't . .
a 7TYPO.of Coaotruotioa
67 foci daep
F
31 a oT. Yiri#ing puiidi 91 ` t foot- fruntl
;f
LIa3 htt^r two atorlop —feet.
before 196a x
r ( Approximate data of eras ioaa k'L
:• Oh flans` l - retail market
(b) oaoupaaay or uaa (0f ae.
2 - office
(o) Type of oonuAruotioMs mixed r i',:
1`
b. H4n there boon-a previous aPplioa ion rc to ZDA ifor want. c $
on u1ri the li it n�aard r
Ycs, traost .
. ` theaa praa�iM�Y7 �985 •.r . =;:.�
tC so, when � r
'J... Daearip iosr of purpose for Xhiah 6pooia PoMit ie Bought on iui� patii ant-mot. L'• `
�'. 1 r{
Site Plan Ctoviaw S with
ecial Pe�mito��iceul�u4f 3dir�4aate1077nOagoo'd Street
.
i
F` the erection of a new retai '
al 912 4 41 or Landk Caurt
aka in ScsaY.L,}1787Pag 2
' 6. Dood raGGTded in the �}�okotry� page__—4 must ,'I "
Cortifileato No`+
be
PO upon ohich 3 Ila" appiipntion erro au #�iioires
+fie prinaiPOLl P wit11 the conditions
gm e '5 in detail 1a�s i cow Lfance
� xlicsnt txse filed t�ere'�Ferml.t ias+�e�
b the 7,onfn Boar(i of.
co[1h�iRe� in its S ecia7.
APPeaie and in camp
fiance wits all app Lc.at�irs aeovieions of the
honing By LaW5-
i nupapax' and Doetae Sep for Railing
iegal
for advsx'tilfr�
ugreo to POLY eat'#. Petitfaneris fli ti$ture
no*ioeu 'ko "P tio� in
Carpaxation
Angus ReaitY #orfn aPPzava,J 'by the
F: Caf rey� ttorneY f sMni3 bo m&d10 ark &, oa�WmnJaatiaTs
" tornas the �aard eat: to..aeolc
dory LpPlication for action teixad by the Cloric uPOn re 111 iltfar�at'�an
sae ,forms uyasll be # ifoa*ion foxes.
" g4nrd+ `L`h pifobtiox► �hewll b4 *rested au mare �totiae ofntont#heroin
purporting 1sa sit P on th# of#iafailfoant in the ma�u;or
xatief unt80
il such time elYa i be mfluniohed by the apP
allod for by the form Y„tares#" which J
jiOt i1F L$� I1 32+ �
prot�cr`ihad. abAil b9 5uxnft#e trfth u a gene osti ors pfeet
iioatiati d dfGeptly PF ed j
Crary aP� #}�o pet'itfager' abutternj oxneig Of lay iiek, norce ++itls—
de r� to the abutters xit�►in iXfcable Lan
a`ha 1, inaku of pr r+ay + } xtte or tDwn, the F
fl?; privat stye kfnc all ae trey appear on the moot xeo othor aft or tom+
of tl�a proFartY ,Oh owner fa leoato� inafty
otax'dix,g that the lay of any boat vt yery
� the piing
Ding
. var3 d of town
t�k4 �
p{ TES ADDRESS
S A'YTACIiVD
i
{
5
{
LISP' 01? PARTIES IN IAlTERPST
NAME
ADDREqS
Franc J. Ragonese 1939 Great Pond Road
North Andover, MA 01845
William T. Averka 1857 Great Fond RO'ad '
and Wanda J. Averka Nox•th Andover, MA. 01845'
Joseph J. Bartolotta }
1925 Great Fond Road
and M. ,Patricia Eartolotta North Andover , .MA 01845
William J . Driscoll 1815 Great Pared Roadand Helen Driscoll North Andover, MA 01845 -
Simonne T. Marchand 1081 Great'. Pondroad
North A11dover, MA - 0104'5
Richard F. Parziale 117 Farms Street -
Wakefield+ MA .01880 =
OPTRX TRUST � E1r� Square
c o William J. Dalton, Tr. Andover,, MA 01B10
The Borden Company 180 East broad Streit
Chemical DivisionColumbus,' Oil 4315
Town of -North Andover 120 Main s-treet - "
Selectmen
North Andover, MA 01045
Daniel A. McCarthy 1145 Osgood Streit.
aria Joanne B. McCarthy North Andover, SSA .01845-
Lynn J. Steinberg
1149 Osgood Street
North Andove27, MA "b1845' .
William Haphey P.O. Box 337
:
North Andover, MA 018-45
Sophie F. Haphey 3254 24th TerraceLgW
Miami, Florida 33145
Fred L. Boucher, Ill 45 Preach Farm Road
and Kathy A. Botcher North Andover,- MA 01b45
Anthony .7. Longo
53 'French Farm Road
and Patricia A. Longo North Andovei, ,MA 01845
Phillip A. DiBened!tto 123 Frendh Farm Road
and Diane F. Di Benedetto North ArWO'ver , MA 01845
��
Michael J. Sala'
4.
Manreen
Sa-1ach 53 French Farm Road
ort�Daniel C. eag
ri Andover, MA 0.1845
R �ri
and Patricia A.. Rnagarl 99 French Farrn aoad
John I]. North Afidover, M 01845
' r`grUs6n
and Anne Marie .Ferguson FreLnch Varru Road
W11"am C. ah l� Andover, MA 01845
artd I(athex`iileos .
Stathos 33 Fx""ch Farm Road
forth Andover. . mA 01845
Airport commission ��
the City c�f Lawrence 200 C
City .zHall Lawrence, MA 01840
Street
The oodwin Trust
c o usselj Tread,,ell '' 13 oodw n Court
Marblehead, MA 0��95
Paul B. Alexander
07 French Farm Road
Deal R. Sha North= Andover, MA 0I845
' and I4ar� ��eig}�,-: . . :.
}� hapje'igh 75 Drench Farm road
Rama r 3 Hart : r.- forth Andover, CIA 01945
d athleen A. !#u+ hes Prench Farm
ox'th Andovert M
hfA 01845
CERTIFIED:
Rdward W Phelan, Obairman
hoard Of -Assessors
��
5�te
- r
a
is
T
7. nnsxnrininri n ' htii+nrtipie wort•••• -.- t
MUM MH
If 0 W jq F N 0 R T 1t A N D V B R REC[[Vf
TOWN W X
NORTh ANDOVER
lyUA7M �L
MAY 4 25 #
S
Any appeal shell be filed ` -,' •=
w thln 1 0} days after iffie is1A4{
date of filing of this Notlice
In the Officeofthe Town NoTIcr: of DECISION
Cie&
May 4, �s�s
pate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
April 21, 1988
Date of Hea]Zitag . . . . . . . , a a . . . r
Angus Realty Corp. a ; . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petition of . . . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . r a . . . . . . . aa . . + a . . , + a , + a
- I
Rt . 125 and Gnat P0 yid Road Zoned GB and E-2 �
Premisesaffected . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a . . ra . . . . .
Referring to the above petition for a special permit from the requiirernents �
section $ar 3i of the a forth iAnvve Zoning bylaw. . . . . r . . . . . a . . .
of the . . . .
+ r
foot commercial
so as to permit a . ..o.�s.tru�t�o}�, o�-aab5��gbt ,sc�t�ara r as�.r�ct�sr�
y. a r . r • • • • . . . . r . . r t r F 4
e . + + . • . + r . . . � r � a r r r . r r
. . aEtq ,re��atecl -im,��ovet. . P a . . . . a . . . r . . . r . , . . r . . . . . r a . . • • 1
After a public hearing given On the above date, the Planning Board voted
.l he . . .s i to plan review appl.icatiorr
t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a . . r
ATTEST,
€ 3`nw dopy fused upon the following conditions
Town Clem
Signed
1'aui H,dstTam, Chairman . r . . . r r . . . . . . . + . . . + . . . . . . + r . . .
Erich Nitzsche
Mike Leary .
f' ktr F r �Cti
r ce to . of+.en the pi,ibl i fEeaa T 3[I i y�k�E ' leers f
yY ?1�1 t
John Simons ,-ead flee 1F'r3-3f r3o � rkhe -
t1�e ��r1��G'�Va3f Lr�r1 C:c�mfa, 75=tn i.?q'i)art Hie aak a� F Pub�a ��ekd�A Associate-
F C7 �G e ��'fx c7l { +.qe"t . . a o }k7°"i E. ;r�E k;CS I'1�5 4 r] L }
� $Mulas OffrFZ'k!f300 S' irY. `- ' E:+ t ,
guard of Health wEmy& rez�'t . r r�ar1,t, tAls0 present were Tom
and }:eE� Yanteerl,
R"gal ty . ua.t - p striated
rupcesent inn �f us Assoc gates . Mr Caffrey Perna
0140e1'57 and Mi . kai l �y ,
Cshhr} s. 11�Fzf + p�� � . �:� � � }� �eOrg�
ftit UW- pr�oplasen Mar, 4•i � �f fS U . oEi. .L attc! stated etail Wilding
that th s I�r L�� 1 l .� had
wanted 5oaie bact-rlh Oullclz i �r c5tiat _ .
k`tr Caffreyw stated that the
€� s}llk1i? rs �P r
sr is .
drainag .. � � r, r Appeals fos.. �n�- . within the 4�at�rs�ed fat-ited after
extension from trh._ sn �� .� P� c�a k signed the-
September
i f '�E?F3 . John Simons � ite� tk�akk�e�Board eaf�pF�p�as
;antstated that
k" time had larpeo . My car �`E cy
- �i- x�n hEtitzscite questjorled #;hid drainage
€�kr Lai `•
de iSion in Febfua€-y 1 '
the develop
,tp"attci� a.af tt�e siye akso genera s additional rlr inat
camputatirat��� t�i�d I:rfe tf�lc�' a}_i�4.-' ��f rufz-off paused woult� go dawn Clark
stated that the t 9 ttd runTaf
Were is 4 inch that e�-ta s3 sa, l ado ontktis
in the fli hrec k ion of t1"ti�: hoer s irn3� kc F?i.Fer' �
Strut , all
tkhe t-jay, �.a k.l, r i - 'rthE
,� ,r,"+ Ixti ix ';tse�,sNed if a traffic r doing the Jra�ffiE.
airport . F'��Ei �� -st f s:r •� € f i � ,51hr3kktr.==1., �t�E" ltrsgt t7A � vz;kri♦_ JeS OTI 05g0oa� Street
f2� ke 12 3�x#rho fE� ti t�'ficnakei L6 ,00
a tr�c33 �'t�; .-F ril F" af�p
study Y . He s tat _d + �'s�i�i� Fund , as,d �autF> of the site oil
,:rsk� i (' kL'c, i"} 4';4, 7 - O��n S"ls3y s�atad t�lc3t
per MY , `� t{+r_hs Q�h iE� e=s to Feu+az der day .
i r F {t.. r aalLtll{n3
�tr e aE�Erg� iannt01y � -cep level of traffic adciirs
k+€e4Jed aE a - k wor ld b problem if
the anayinis o VW, `-^ turfy 1:yom st3t26 thszt therm'
pool "n=1 1
eU
amah�nt of th• -�i' { a..' . r t";a E._ ] ��r �- Sts-F,eF. and sam�o+*e t3E� irEg aKlallewr,'d
sofneonc o _� s E t e ( Dutcher ti`k�e� Boy ) , 01,1 y
� cornir7 TrS��E �"�,h.rp•�h ? si3*{, Gj0pQs �rd � t� tefl t4at lffhere were cae,ci=E ,�� Of. sigh
„E.n ]s:Ih h i .-:L left on 05good street .
for bD01 tUil-n ."19 ' 7_2I nL-tk of f� � ,E" k.. � E•ie� r ,3rld ggir�i�
dO_gtancy w�kz+.n vnmihE. 11C . €�ilx Stat.er� tfEak tie cortdi tii�ats tti
plans whow a F{:_"ble
traffic would be W f0l s " ;
_ in the a •+�•
6o vohickew erispik ,_}4 °, r3tr.� rE aF4knte in the P - m-
0 0
Mr P
peak. hC1Ur t I - a t 0 JRVAM-W,
The �3�J P'Li ;c'�. 'rjrl ' eoqioned the
to What yeas-
was r Road , an abutter t r e am
SimetIs questioned tit nd the constant
yf thQ th r2 I --t rood RoAd , questia"ed th trea a oted to kKow
" Ll liam briocnil 100 GN ?OF kh& lake and he also wa
- - tot o- P�A &C that the elevation was
rUrI(%i0q [)f L-J"3 r P.31-1 Lo 12i . Ln Y 5 t A"' pood Road is pp,,ximately;
the _) f IF10:� 7-,C)k,Ikh EASL 00"er of Groat vehicle's wl"
approximately W ' . ogg"00 s0yet , questioned how WDY
LL4 ' . Will ' " "an lis , E- 0-3 Mr . May Wad the about a third of
left and cipht comicK, out mf We Sitp th . Paul Wdstrom que5tioned
rII-!I- tTL �Ird tvin, 0el-It 50LA at the apPiica"t is to
the traffic �" le0go . ycoyt Sto ckj"g stated th rl , Great Pond Roat'i hcad
the jandscaPKV an'" ': and tha PAA - Mr Drisco. also Statki
nuKfy the Alrpnrt COMMIUQUI) ining being 20 ' high - He posed building
Ut Lhe YCLght Of " r" and that th& P"
concerns aho to hil PrOP"Y the right-of way
that there W as a Caffrey stated that if
gh t on We C i gh t -CI fok- 11irl, to haV2 access to {;
}Uid 1,00M pagenese poke for his
, j5t� thErn W pao& 7710 . attorn(.�y for Frank the prcPu" stv"cturv _
property . A0 Y 1;0 q OG, ld bg 70 feet from plans shown as the back
ient Nr �€yr' �k� id,ntjaL
e jg on the
Uf rho inning 0 as oppgsed toThere is a q 1 7- sproblems with
ride of the by i le. V00 WE) juild be substantial yards Of grave "
Attorney RatAdurvn t-7 d tt� requiFe --1
. I iL y building rather th
Fill ,
reqard5 Ind a one Stor the 5quare
L 01,n 14, 1 r 11 d the Palking 3nd
He aiso aspe ; I i 04SUhQ quentione is following the 1985 ZOOM
i i �fl r Kik t
Wo story W_ �.!L.r, 13 - I 5t AQPlilan J165 203w5s sta"dardl
footage as repahri e using the
3W qu-Avin"Wo why boy oey
Bylaw . r-aul yledsti 4 in-I io place at that time for thK
e f f7i F-h�,_ :I�Irl from Town COUP32L
e v_�ejvqd . letter id
do hE tionc
3nd
Nr F Farm RoAd , que-S
III-o " L . 75 French f these
ting that in the discussion 0
sta not iycjuded
why thr PrOpavoi 44A nhnLv� lated to ths portion which is
Al awa 1WAI it yaq not le a, is 9 . E acres of laod
Mr n Qm Ststed that the parc se wanted the
kJE3 Vr� Ono 7
jrIg 112 " iv � R 20 0 and 59 . Frank pagene m Cheputi
dish, K., willia
in throw zoninp ovding the zoning freezes
rownr of the Board of ASP
Permit and thak
Lilt let truction wa5 compieted . He a
Alt that wlltil f..r
I_iE -Las fjjj�..(j otittL
a huildinq 00"0 1 pepopovd kally stated that John simom
6 _� e abutting- zuno -
askc?d if P19 , [!t3cfeq I t h from the UYWO ,
Henry Fink qupltiq-�d this ,aac and read that secKGO
stated that did nok apply March Os MG .
H TION . 13Y Joho 9 ,L tti;? pt
(3
SECUMD ! G"ge
VOTE ; or thnno or tq"" -
L,el oeotj "q
Johl
Of L_i'09E) P1
lys
HOM ABOVE
John Sjfr�OTIS n r� W7 L ices to open thu puQ I Q hear iniqla.LetterE werQ
H0!11 th and Co 0629 M ssion .
ser ten C I yr-if a I H R ' [.Ov"PY F Q1 jqh" Jaddi wa, pqesent a"d spoke 110 the Board .
W Infeld qkntpo Lwab he had heeD before the planning Board on severa
occasions a,W bet i- !"n W-11 - all qns4tions reined
by the Board have been
f t(10
addreswed � The an ; Y lnw!n F,'hoh had yok be addrpssed was tt)e FAR , the
area ratic � a4;d ha,� adch- E.Ssed with a new Form A Plarl.
30neJ " Uhn f1jIns . which the 9oard has roviewed , have We" Put
011 the Form A F I a" 1W 1 "do said Lhat thaV had been , showing the WWI parne
which is 4 ,2YO fact Wgel -
permit with rational - VA-LY .
(learge Perna qUq0t1 ,1k-le.j U10 CL11nmell before the Board
vnFold
Cl j a had q the i5Ftee was brought
t a I"P at the detail` jS io the rL-Card-_ alid thek-E
Dr-ovio"S .Ly . k e 4_'�'l P' Cj Njj tzschp s tF3ted tha t Y come
nE, r r7 involved is made velative
S-.Ort of tile P'l
all "rilpV CIvofeld stated that an agreement ha5 beet!
thr omrlloDn orivewo- ,
c
submitted OW
saped if the now P100 had the sam2
Lil the GanservatiOn C"mis" On'
Factorint aq the 01 00 41 s the Qzu of the tel-
F-�t t C3 I-t le)'- d' � 'I.r 11 1 C"." - l a {-,:athe ! the "IM difference Wa
jorqua .
di ,, 10sures and the matLurs
tj Hedstrom
Pat- L h ear inq al-?: il-ir�;OrWataf "to
jr eC inion for cummon driveway n"d sit!
r L L�j r. 7 d
1!4 j t ma t 11 a t is in the record aild I f-'--
A
p a n S1 bF r t i on
i t.ltcj t:I.,r- I-c-c f3 v i r i r L 1. kh f� a k.-Ma
L5_,__r_ hear j ng and L a ke the Matter U"dIST'
NOTION; FAY jn3oq tu .S'.P
EL} 1 fir_advisone"t .
SECOND : Gecrqr Mrl--,
VOTE : Unanimmun Ut khoun vc-OVM .
Qtn, Ye-
- ;e"t ""d DrqrF![jtE?d the Soavo with copies of his
Thomas w �Ty, t y, i at t.be Pabri-lary Hth meutinq � 'frQm a "- "el so
response tu Lslu-a 01 Ou twenty- W
J�' - -I ..kkjrjU.;;r Hi , Cafruey Wed Mat there was
Uy SOOL t Ston i "q im, is needed to ad sae them. The G
till mr.�i P
th, five mpiol- jnAuen in a jotter that was sent LO Mr -
Caffrey Unp OC ths ! ISO-" was We 9placial Permit it 5till val id -
phs poy i t ion, that it is Ya I id - A00thr-
E'affrey -said 01.2A ;LejoeQ i " thly Guard of Appeals SPecial POrm"
issue was what W"� K man Co. Stated at
' t Cnl_ltainad the Nork
L,JaG th* 1 ' 1tC? �tjat w.�Ls recorded :iA the timO r3l`j it
identified a"A & -- he wnditions in the de" '
did emp I kcitly 1001 "d- thx� ik-k one of the Hk
the qwvstion of the curb-cut ,
nnd the p An important One a0d he WOU16
Caf fray 5 d U w ut iOl-k , I'll" -Z041iriq Djetrir- t qWe
address 1 t I a 40Y Mputing to chilngc Part Of t"
C'Iffrey 0 -1 ek
_d cj-�vobinq thi�4 recurds of the If?8"
n-n 7 1 "n . 01 hirlm Ion ,
fI f 1t that the line +.hown €}r'1 the plans
i s ex:4e f'• t Y kthr' r 1-- a- I•I in I L F {;{'1 W J' (.t'LS?iged i n 1964 fQwn ygojrM and the
w.-Irr a k: ,ar t K I " , 0ANIEL LONG
Tows V R A
NORTi
}h� tCher Bey, �.} G d €' �.-zp}' ?r k I.r-.f `-Jfi Fj 1i + �
MAI
ni i_h T'i: Bards in ' `"`r"— 3. i� f tp" e - i rtq c i gh t -of"way ansemlant Mr . Caf f r-E�y iai c
they have e ;rtlr.l';ii ! t :)� *,tLi= lye t-i ; C';,• pj 0q "fin r t Located and tha net rP513 t N rrl
Fhelr Cpinium i '-i Yi - i 1 ireljl; f5 "'fF+ y, t"i ill access to nsgood Street , in that
the right -o f"L-! ; y Y70F -- 1" qe'_ r]V'F..+F' 3 safe paved acce55 to usg{hod s tre"t ,
Mr , Coffrpy SCOOP - i th"- 71 hT IKS= W" ill"" raised by Scott Stocp ing Tbvill
p l arinec P t � ! „+1 O y p j Rn t: l ng schedule . information w i l i be 5howi s
oar th rZL !'1 ri ; 700 $, 3 .,.•! d Ih+._y r i"hf Vr4 to the app l i0ay i p Zoning Bylaws thAf
r�l rK* en i :a tan t at 0 ir_ I s ?I 7 - .. vcnc i n l [3+"3UM K was i S::med .
rjrl the l ssu" U F St'.S i 4+r� �i,�� k ,,IrF' j F Fk!T3 i:lse Sat e of the fens v at &he RagorleGo
Property , Nr- . Ca f f r- a., s a s hy'-f t"n t it was ] abe €ed and it con forms to what the
� OrikT3V t�f3c�eC1 r e,Flrr � a?e
rtt'1 fflk al [TSr ' ': :+pis r11 }I.Ir ifs `"32rhI91+_I '•lr � f rl!'. +�r +.�akr Pi•�3�ek €3d } 'IT C• ff4' y Sc� xr
thLzt the rare ] ho F ,_ _'r,l 4t,V. k'--at l - d G; ye Fo"d Road was lar rely l.00ded a310
substantial Y shi71A7 ,;° ; ;'tf e3t Pond Road and that thv final grOi.3M
e l ev Z t'• i eov 11 t c Fh+.r !h fir[t ': ly r= '}"- A [ sw that t all f i nj Sailed grades on the sit"
are Shown riot 1,11e 0 . .ih t-}hat; 1,tilp j o,, ding dnc� car, ac�cclmud i a to t rL3C1;5 . F : r E
lanes and hydra"t , qua, �4k! t;rOsh C"4PF3Zi' t:E]r- a' 04� t"L P ] aC'lS .
�k the i�u�3Fii�rh �} � k;irr, r3� t,LL1 r, 1 :��51' 1oq % Hv . Caffrey defnr"red and said that Hr .
Lally IrJ(#i{ add,+3 tlf? i s`In, Uut' basicaily it would be addressed through a
5ywpagr-_ pit to b kn- t;ltkr"A . rh- . CafFrey statedthat thebe, mechanical
facilities 4'ri ! i hl[` F ].Fe cif flrt iKLYam the roof and will be located toward the
ci rater .
On the sign 10!"c • !A' €:r:Li Fi s•:tiri t iia all the information on the sigF-)
cieta i is that acp ' s i l ab l e t Lhy o i w p a"d location, but out the Dame aq� yet .
When t"e name V9 A+'- Fermi"od the jnr*rmation on the number of letters is not
a;}ailai}i t tt, ; limo all,{ they C:a44not comply to the detailed requirements *f
the sign ordina"cT and Ohm fur the i:s:l3ants Wns ' Where they wilt be located
and the basic s i zp is j or" R i f ied .
prr the of ut t E i l," it'-__ , i-1r .. CaTney agrees with the final design f[?r
water , sewer aInd stuvwNzLe dcair age system meeting kppraval of the DPW . A
question of du5ig rn"fl : nus botwecn drainage lines and waters lines that
exist „ t]s❑ecd r;}! ^^# . Ctl' . Lally moo }h erxcnt to address the issun . Grease
trans are show" Q" the sawel 1 i "es for all cunTlec t i rtg rest a4-Lian is . A draft
drainage ua5e hePt OOSs j1anv rect= ived from the attorney of Channel Building and
Etr C:affre•,r i l �} r ; E: Wit"' '-}h- 9oard . Technical work heeded € n the draft but
substantiallysetjf� the i�Fl`:i r"^ te3rwciine� , The drainage design has been presented
to the Board .
] he t k fll£ r[]r VUFll f r.r; I t mirk•? k, -' PE.f,- rj h, u l a , j Qn of traffic and Seepage P l t f eY
the c�r rLr] n"j i pr !]07 j O j C nOL1E 1 i n is &Tt een the new ti Ner line and existing
no t C r l i I1G aHl I" 9V0V � r" a n f t"s p l .airs Naq rev k 5ed t0 1TFwe 4 the Board
reQutvemeno -
wei•xr❑e 11ramn,- i•_ :j�. .r.r.=,E s-kl'.� r;r,,a 'rl t ],gig r"QVi rd plans of the untrrance chwige whin
meet; s on n DPW :�r,� F ., .'a ° _r�,a,r� t't pv 1! -0 -'PUM to the Board about ta}e tra f f i c
issues . He - t avaw VN Q h- hin Mr' 1- with the State DPW and that thQ State 1500
31.E �1rC?{3C,yC'.Ck C ' . movelTont into Clark Street occurs
I IFr•" -=��r:�rrsFFr� �;[�rr�:['r is Tkpt LT'lpEh�
0 The size of
kEt f? :2r {rarer i ' ' "2 ' 'E I' ..
= TS DANIEL LHv
� a„ I ,
'�""
NORTH ANDOVER
} - riYNa r3i ?lah L,r- i i
1he stclt`'4 co"
r F`I _ �._��=y' �:z I F # fy�+ � FT� k t1$Fk!� }{�i T'r l .�n # d }[� f'E liTl{7i.1C �
. I. l I':'S E.i5r3 �!1'Z � r 'l3d intet'serttn�� QFl Gi-Fat Pond Rnt-id
± ry
h_lxe er}�.,- -3i�inO •,., : E7 F ! the appiicant working wi0 thL sEate DPWJ
£� 1 lF;t•, -a ,l7r'I fit'!' L rry i-7� t [ rah :i
4 c. N�� lJ�.k k. ``� 7Lr j ne 105 Fir �`iamor- 1 5 Shr,)vj d J rr)t"' .
John G12?kOVE Cj 11f'r> Iv Lr'+ISr"i q.r }ram' _
fls4 t1k'= Si =XI '=. jnh" .� j , questioned the locatiuy'h O� fibre rE�� Lhlln
.
r hp 1 oc a t 1 f--" _ r t I l l bah i rtd the 1 5Q L buffer
Wa r # . M1 1Sr:SMI"- i i y i 0 via I T - nil
F wall was differerLC John stated tkle�f:
Palo
i .'}r'L�'S . j"�� + c?[fy❑1" k5 said that kt was still
it was not 1
} k.��rl IIr�'fatf}1 `,` lef re al-i e'ti OTl �1 l� �Str ru O the
Pau k �radstr"{3n1 4r',1' " first i ik' '
weer±,: I. lac• -�k1� . r�l� fill- 1�4 f
Spect3 � p
F'kr . ja s�!� i5 said that
I - ,;,�,,,F { ;.hr m'a ��i r:Lj paved gall
J,hrL °� i rTt^7, 's �� -s�,. 0 and in the back of the Praper ty .
there l ov, 1C� ter, E 1 `� :.`:. .k{- Said that i t ixrl-
c rl5xr'tC� ..'3 I I .r� ,sl-•1 j' °-es• a- f � 1 e d U C �: [`1r fr-
,al so que . t { { r� i ,.' 1 �-!E�en the Board of A�lt,]ea "
1=11CsL di-: e t e �r
_ ' .eL i_ ll •, ,! ll' �rj F'fl-� t thetheC�F'� SSS4ll l^Fc3} made p
Mai r
a�5 .
k 'F°'''y : • [ .,,�t.,, rF € rE [1F r�`ai 1 I that the c�kL-rentanlh}c� t [�
,mot tt Stocking . An errek' in curve Ong the
C.I ,r, [ '-'h{'1 ti Ft t]r k2 �E' _ hov
U -2 i5 fig, L„ii�'� _ rtF' favor . The �4kl-rer�t )iar�
P lill5 37Z �. !.5F i =,1 '.,r},' 11? Mr . � ?�i}
property I rt 3 14atod that an easement plan sl�oh�l� t}�
thE� cu7-k-er F I"E.a r F .- i c y $ k} � ; __�,l i`_
T_Vcorded Wi Lh !hr? =}ayr' iar E3�'h rr3i .
Trani: f?c'ir3{nfs=4- ,
rk :Elfi P) anoing Board and gave then some
i
history r� ts1, .,i�{, rl{k tfern� k'ect�r ded ❑n kl�e p� t i � i
Est' rl I� 3 � $ { E > size of the buildiT�g 3L�` 106 feet ,
that was f ; f F,d alto the 0 feet tki h . F'lr . R�gone�e a�5❑ stated
12 ) heights �r'�?fricl permit with t�Lil�ts�+� .,
it Was gra
at an September 3Q ..
❑i�clitiok,s , one ok the `_'_�rth `S:{ jQfUn irfas that a revised pldxti b ut}r�hittet3 ❑r
approval ❑f the ze-.6rig Fo��, [ f AE}#3 eals .
R1>o that a year and a half
� �t�:�'
the lane ;aeri., rss rrht L' t J !;r? the f?c�nyd or A,peals which sub5tantialiY mod ' "
R r that {�}❑s gk ar-,l';Ud and t�herk was 'no �r[h ) �c Raga es
the spe�_ isl per�r[i .
r .
to abut tek
- and 01-1 E v by ter__;- i dent he €ourrcf i t recorded • hu� �tf i�g� to�L�e placed
that tt)e Ejc131-d yirrit to&P '. itr? , r1{3 � ikS[� Rt1�' Slat ❑
tl�ere andE-Li�w t1'y�:: land r ; �_�'�� r,}mi ++'a downGr�a� Pond Road to Osgood Street .
dinq
also st`res=ud thni. e fOr the parcel anc
tr}+ { 'C3 [.ff ;ttf� 1]41� +rD �h r ❑rLce r�was too iofpMr . Ragonese was WE
that i t was i�LZ�, r, 1 'F� O� r_� IlQ',=� 4 kvr? �
- t:l oat �'�� Ir_r f}!]ad . hlk- . i.a 1 l Spp�;e to the Board about the
water f l ooi rra orr. _ r", #� ,�.;{;i lo�,F seepage pit has been put in to
Eur f ace water •1r'}+_� •Z1-'.1u"d :1
diver +. the {-r� �-e,- , r rklY? �tt� i ��E �- . 1•iF z .{� � •y' Sr1o[•,Ff_'{� E3e'Org@ Per
the l0cati❑F>,
� a.�s=" C_ g4.:rk
the P i t of tk`'" M t
'-';' far �
[ s r-�•r i. r- ae +q� k?'y-4rC ��,.}hkE t?r� #;p �!l'1Ckl"r .hL7ti•Jfromtale pk-k?i1Ct'} Fa:
P-Nnir- i A�=Lkja'h ` k ,_r ra�kl_il� E F't[- . ffk-ey Said that it wat[ �d
l kkrs E. °- kyl_x1 L `�
i
1
000 sq � the
0 � y fir
H; ,1 k �t•. � k:k,r- =t1'�a - + was e, k -)f- the `
.� _.•; rr'rt{a �t It h�rl�,�e 0 kt,e
iitlk $ ry t i 1,'? i1 }ta q L el Ce. o.
kr Xrr nth 5e-� � " _ ira �1 '•�r
h t � ls :{� ! r rr, Caq.tE' der. �S �� ala aPP�pfaI g+{ 1 ,31
E 4} the 5Q
1' t5 � F �,� 1 � k,?�. L Lek' tr•a t The hi ar,�. f}ians
milt . signed ,
o- rtr 1 ;.} � PeT t-kever
cr►t i kv k ♦- sr sLi y_e, rks "'�� wa gt-anted s aL 5atd
zonistg r iltX Pats
par- lri�+`s } ar resat' ' � F k :_�.� 103q . , � P r ��tS of ;�skke� - valid .
.-�. "- the PerrErit t5
G�,eranit� lh�E= tusie== � �„ct Lt)r? t<Y4� i L� ; `tOfli�hC� if
j; tec.t toy the Ville
r r) rirzs i,x t�•,{ t, klt'x'rki �y! 4' ` ±�`' t. the stant»y
was Rake > +� Ia}:e is
that it ralk p u6 JEJLSk. teT � robl 'm with the
�r R± 1 ar � of the P Wk1ic�r
-�{} L 1 �7E "' 3t-4�:}41 � p eept l�
i ,�rit 1 i � kr , �.r. -;;3"1 � r th, are Of, iv f�nd F�aas�
,-sj�' • t'aJ yes aiohg C� a
`snail r iak�t rzr�rk t-lar' f- r ` k-E[xcz- that the r is- ht-C]# ,� it3y
the Fl�h1�`n` 4 ar Hr . [}rti3Ck] ll 5t���d � tO �-yi5 Qy"Qp
futy
v ' c.-,�; �,Ga!ths to Cain awes Iti�e3d �1 ��! k♦�3p
- i f'd 1 h 0W, r_r1�.rr-� {�On�
150 -` crCf t.'. `S141i y+llkpllrh l4 hf_ �P fhlgm Greater - Driscoll said t�13 � 5'�C
y- f E k k~= - O`4 3
has t3ce,-� to Clow; g� x Osed P �arEy
beci < ��itCk7 ,/fir ! ,- ' ❑lY t�;Sr �!�O�
f tt�r� l�yi4' ;++ s:r kzi..s k}�-r3E4r Y { t }
is cation a � t�f's ,r firing up ,
y., t CouISi h''3 ' L y. {�` Rtr isco i i WQ5 aPac i t),
.'=h 101es 4k�j� [1i�4. L1Yf • L. �k. Q1^ sewer
��vo+ 1_�.:c „..z �c.a =.s- } ,txe of sep tkie P�- Posed
, i1. ) is- tyre SCOQ� T�lp
r�7, 3Er1
, a �"#edstrsirsiook E, i } ou siie "buttev5 -
o�r 0� tf'r , 'o �' _;C3=.tc i ) l i care and acre
kv toss rGtZ
�, 3thkr3t � � �5� r��z � s :. '11}� � ': '}!4 ��ry9.L.p��" tho ��� se It
irLl�.�
i }-li3 15t4x - 5r4S4 } �.1
y_�rs L i. „r:4tk tv the �aart# �ecas-.k_
s)rryxErl �� �FrjoI'
lk7 i`' 'a`- i�atl ' oftt
r iCalt-'o - s ='S i zt, . Ll tkta
sl�idl c) f ktz } = i # �hax;'e ,}uk' i5ditiasz u
ti }+ �}' �rLry la �t{ir3Llthe Deed ' �ffxee > >nC impact
RcP
�1Y 4.f 7 f ` r � 1 to 4.
t-o f-way • that -In Enf os-♦=�sn� repo- t hac
T. 19h d i f a"o ttrtilr
�t� f f�ak,r!5ti�:sl�lft . r3takei aSE: t� �� rd •
r3rt",-,` ;_3 ., ' v of being P ah # i led c
T ?:rL kl�[' ,f-a �'n aid cl�=ivied ` races a;-d ,
Ja�Ck k_ 1r"U:�P3h1 . _ } 1_rr� 4•yari ik"1 ��� � - �ip�S'E of.
toad k3[=_�it <�sk54ny_tr - } ] S l '.,. tk�a i "dell
Ckk �*G7 all srrf€3t Fiotice
F
r3rl f i Ld . tkoi i t. . 4}h k k: af, a sewer I ins t were a} #:P_r�d 'F1
i{ `.l.sk=~ 4'prr_= E. a.tr: ,+q'- ihti Out ". t tkaS not apt
ro
ina ic]t' f-.�r a:�tii� t2 G�ri�et'va � i�r3
vGG3til Oh�L3
rti k;
intent was � w � r,3 klr� hav t } the
r, Fy5
4 done
On he PrO E
E'ito }�l L-r li�r^
y .�.xUlr'�' pro k �„ r, had Ur- erty , of
n f any .�.t:r3 }"�±ii `,3)cZ r ,.,ter � 5 i;,i'te Pr °�
yE��'..F? r 4i'+ 'k �4,;Lr=iit:e31 } i 09 =-E L'r lines $ rC}
i �► 0i��'.Rmh+'+- 12 �.rx-
a pes`i>ti't C . ti f_yl �1fe r1n � t
u 5 i ze o f the u i l d i rhg .
r[{� .l f:L '' y.ti€" ? C �1t~ �yy ' a
fit.=1C't �_�l from
�- - rr� - k�1 i s
�r]kl9'l �tnrU :.k [� �•h4�r;. th'. �f7T f+ yleB� -
k �- i2 Csf_�;1 45 t - hgal' ing
r_s" L �.r.t ,-� +yb � lC
22 7 7 ML
}+
r''yr I } e ,4 � top Kh�;.
t�'tk L 1 ON i o 7i i = • • _ � 4
3Y d -3shc!
r ti.kt ifs E. _. . , Li
#t g r
DAflIEL
MORT6 Kfl 0
PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED ��t01�f '2RE MARCH 2, 1488
ffre stated that the ss DPW has tentativeiy approved the
Tom Ca y
access design to the site. He pissed one a �,ettar to the �nard which
outlined the items still to be resolved:
1 . Test pits to oe done fete
2. Sewer plans submitted are 7 core
Mr. Caffrey stated that they vet e unable to p
rocecd with the project
an abutter and isetas ed prior to the exteiisfon " by
due to a suit from an
of s�war access. John Simons said
the time period for the special perm
the Board of Appeals.
George Perna asked hour the applicant could change tl�a easement. Mr -
..asked
aid could. Paul wanted to know rowed the Board pliotasouk afather
Caff�eey s You The applicant sh4
going down Great Pond Road.
model fro3u special camera.
e asked i they have filed a Notice Of
a�Ceinteabo ►tnt tthebe
Erick Nitzsch will file soon. He also p
ACC- ,fir , Caffrey stated they NACC due to wetland disruption
3 toeplcation = requirements b the
along the rear property line.
Jack Find
on also
stated that the NACC typically requires tins�t tile replication
occu
be placed on
the site in the area the oXigirxal disruP if a wet andrsystemewhi-ch
stated a concern that the wetland altered fs part o
rums into the lake. This is a very sensitive area and the ACC Would review
this tatter closely.
has
Paul fiedstr aiid om stated his dismay that a wetla�sd discuphatnna actionred
ear
and that are Unforeement Orfleras s►�ir� Ca£frey�statad�they did �toC receive
was taken to resov the problem.
the order. likely wire a 50'
woul
Mack Lindon cozntitkned�and stated the NACC
setbacC from dthe wetland due to the
n disturbance area and 100 structural
sensitive natisre of thin wetland and its relation to the rake• red
uric Nitzsche stated that ab,�the-'. after
ter' ACCaactiox� sa +sld be requi
to refile his site play with the Board,
Mocking stated that the 3-1 •repIica�i.Board
qandement wouldwli.kely
Scott plan before tt
place serious impact uP art the ��tc lay►.
to speak with his lawyer . The
require a complete redesign of the p
. Ya�een asked for a � minute recess
1'l�r
and the meeting was suspended at 9:4 p.m.
Board granted his request
The Flann in, Board tecarLvened at 9:55 P•m'
fr. Caffrey st Ced Se was disappointed- in the oo�
Unden. Caffrey
FrarEk Ragonese, as abutter stated he disagreed with r-
He stated that;
An us. has modified tie gi�u� twice with zto noti€ication to
1 .
abutters; and
The wa application has been reviewed �y the Towel Depts. .
2. y the a
has been inadequate.
ubmitted photos to Chi Board which Thawed tho wet3,a�►d disrup
Lion.
fle
Paul
edstr the action the
om stated that the issue before the Board has chug
ia�.l with this new information end asked whatsubstant Y
Board wished tc take at this time. have bean changed substantiall
Ions quite different
Erich itz5che stated that the P they are xi W
from the initial
set of plans submitted and Y
from the Board of Appeais plans.
Also NACG issues need to be addressed
full , n does tot attmp to d .
which this pla
Kotion to ON-
close
the �teartirsg and take the matter under sdviseertt,
second by John imcns, vote wj
s unanimous .
cheduled to be issued
Scott stacking stated
that the decisir� was s
during tiic April $, f9S8 Planning Board 3�eet $•
1388 the following members were p
resent and vctirig� Paul
On April 8' Eric lqitxsche and Mike Ueary
}�edstro't, John Simon , Iicatio�►, baked
Board-
deny the site plan x Board.
John Simons made a .otion to fob oth - Paul
ens outlined in the draft do voted before the
open the 7 .,',diti The Boar No
the Nitxsche voted in favor of the moti,an.
uric Nitzsche seconded x c motion ahBtaine'd•
11edsttom, john Simons, to the motion. riike LeaYy
members were in Apposition
TowN OLEO
SI' E pL{� g ,Vl W - By SpBCIAL pE IT -.DEN,,
4
under th:LS site plan
salts and inf orinatiort subMi.t red 8 f inding�
UFan review of the F Board makes the fol. ewist
s ecial permit, the Flanr►ing g Law:
apgiicaticTn by p of the By
Law;
licat-red by Section i0.31 and BeGtao�t $.3
ecifc SiCe is an appropriate location for such
a, finding thaC
car►not be nade due to Ptocec�ur�l and
the sF
a use,
structure , nr condition; Zonfn aw which were not addressed
5ubstanti.ve requirerne�tts of the
b tie appli£anz in this praposa� before the board-
by that the use
determine from the infararation neighborhood.
h. Ttie board cannot adversely affect the surxoundin$
as daveloped will not to find that
ute information upon which
�idva ade4 public safety
C. The boax�i does not Resent a nuisance or serious p or to the
will Trot p area,
the proposed use edestrians of the suxonnding
prabienxs to vehicles ax
community at large. the pxeposedacii� is
thero er operation of
d. the board i ds th�eainfomation before us.
nor- assure Y under M. L. h• EkA,
erntit grsnting authority or coTapliance
evil P ect is not in harmony
e. The ;board as the sp xo osed pXo D l.aw.
Section 9 , finds that
teand intent of the oniY►g By
Law
the 8eneral purpose
Co deny the special
ndiugs cited above the board votes
Tlpon reaching the f iresons
permit for the following rotes this
permits to enable t1 a board ter�nit aXe lacking-
The raquisi_te zofling Alas► review under a spaczal P Sept. 24,
site F eels approved ors
application for Board of +pP
The site plan which the Zoning 87 under a special permit to allow
10, �' ermit district was for a
1985 and extended on Feb. }larch $, 1985
cottstx�sCtion w'ithiTi the watershed special dated
31 ,402� square feot one
story structure Cp zone
whi,�h
contained n retaining Wald Puts'
of the sso cut buffer
of 50o linear feet- foot, two story
square walk
gggrlifci� contains a retaining
Tile plans before the bpa��la14}far a b5t8b sq
structure (plan dated P
within the no eut buffer zone of 5 5 iriear f eet andPlaced in a new
location. licant presented
nor has the aPP permit There is no evidence in the file, no there �x sts $ special P lated
evidence at the public, ty within
watarshed district as contemp
for cans truction aotthety wli cation before us.
by the apPlic:anC Est the apg under a
The Planning Board has
no authority to approve a site pianl with
are
s not.
ermit a oTsPlicatiQTk which
inedoinithets f Zonin Pegylraw.
special pcamp
regulations c
the present
T C E I'
f,LE
BUTCHER Boy r,kRKFTPI-+GE _ ��}��� A?�
Y '4 28
itds eci
boat the latest plans be ore us a r iof
The board fuxther fl me an currently in file in the Regis Y
below is not (plans#1069 9) which is related to the special Permit
Deeds Office (plan ea�.s.
granted by the -Board of App P for review.
2. A complete set 4f sewer plans were not submitted to
The Board cannot detera4ine if the proposed sewerr design meets D 'standards due to lack " information•
regarding the natural spring on-site gave oat been
oterttia3
3. f}et{nil plans rep 8
rd
inda
at
he
pW f
review. The boa
submitted t 'Lake dtke to i.nadequate�design hfor tthe Pspring
adverse impart to the
requires a more detail aad coruplete review.
ro osed drainage pipes from the Site and a iaajor
4. Conflict w't the P p exists d or �f'W.
along Osgood Street has riot been
waterline which currently
resolved to the satisfaction of the Bear
5. The ap} iicant has altered a resource area along
the rear property
ion Act.
line is violation of the Wetace tileswetlandtdistutbed bye3applicant
�meseas
shall be required to xepiace
ar
required by the act. 'ale raplacaea shall quire tha�elaadiztg docks-re new sitemplaner�t
of the proposed str�xcture and ea nt which is in compliaTice
shoulijbiftttedp
Shoving these changeditiortsdfrombe, sthei NA�C.
With an Order o Con
uirad by the state was not
cation before us. he board
6. An Environmental impact Report as req
submitted concurrently with the app with the Planning
requests that the PA proees run cunc"Tstateyagenties which have
with
Board review rrl order to coot
jurisdiction withthis project.
�� fic Impact Deport has not been submitite.toAtIrafficile d
. A dEtail iraf
studying the current design of the access to the sd the
submitted was for the original accessorthe}new access
Impact Report act Re ort based +gyp
board requires a aew Traf in lrnp p
design-
s shall be deemed to be contained within this decision
The fol.Xawing plans Market place,
Plans prepareLc
by mccaren AssaciaCrevisia�tes idone on April 14,her Boy 1988-
dated Oct. I5F 1986 with the last dated 2I37 .
Drawing No. L-1, Aye elevations}
M, rinthorty Lally Assoc
Sheet entitled Details & Profiles, reprised
Jan. 1987 .
. F
L EXCERPT Ir QI'�f NO€tTH pNj)()VER ZONING 8Y LAW
year , t se Zoning Board of Appeals shall. orgarslze �
ect a cbairman and Clerk from within its o
me ership.
ard of
The len h of trma of theemetermrs of haneomember
Appeals s 11 be such Lhat the
expires eao ear . A member of the H rd of Appeals
may be remov� or
es cause
have been Boar Of
candela cpublictflien y
after writ e g
bearing had b en d.
Vacancies caused by d I is I
rL-5ignatjon, death Or
any" other cause shall be lied in the o medmabber as
Zoning Board of Appeals 8m rs are aP
I �ff 10 , 22 powers of the Boar of Appeals
i The Board of A eats shall have the 110wing powers :
1 . To hea and decide actions and appea as provided
here '
� '
2 . hear and decide applications for apPrcP to
pecial permits and variances w 'Ch the Boar
�o act upon under this B
of Appeals is required
L'aw.
10 .3 Special Permit
The Special -permit. Granting Authority shall adopt rules
and regulations £or t conduct of its business
relative to the issuancef gPe lbee filed with rmits. h COPYeo
these rues and regulations shall
�i`qw clerk . sha
The Ealesr� �oa gofa the �size €oo��a]i�,
as a minimum, a desc p
ontersts, style as�d number of copies and number of
i plans acid speci€ications to #�e sui�mitted ar�d the
procedure for submission and approval of Special
t
Permits.
The Special Permit Granting Authority may grant a
Special Permit within the framework of this By Law -only
which must be he Id
after holding a Public hearing lkcant files
within sixty-five (65) days aftex the aPp
for such Special Permit. The sixty-five (65) day
emed to have begun with the filing of
period skull be de
the appli ration with the Special permit Grtanting
Authority-
The applicant is responsibly for
trarssEsslttrsg a copy
of the appl1 atiOn fox a Special
Permit within twenty am (24 ) hours of the i ing o
' theapplication with the Planning Board or the Hoard of
91
and the Tawx� zietkth 'nlication with > _a
geleCtmen kt �s to be ;Bhalrle the aPP cat to
a SPeclal 1I 4fY F Yi �.cJ • . �.�.
p�pealst the appwho shaariem dour (-24) .t. , ,
the Town C1 yp,I � 4n L ithin
tvz e n ` =.
aard �� ���. permit
the a sir Special
nd>`t.ion ��� Ap�rova� shaii not.
1,0 .3 raTItirtg Autho iSpecial Pet it
1 , the sAec a Permit ment aiJ, the
and suc appiicat o", I d
approve s that ire �
unless itn s are met:
condition ,Op,iate location
fo�.lawin9 Lion; .
s ecz, is site is an a . or condi
a The
such a use , structure ,
�r not adverseI-
The use as dereo ed
hood.
b t the Haig s has
�g�ec o� set iou -
nuiLsance
There wiii edesttia" ;
c
to vehicles ort P a Will be
oillt'i es
dequate and ap Yo peCeOpejCat]Ori of thed} for the p
prov ide use; shall not
proposed RuthoritY
a1ce a �
Perlilkt GrariksS �lhlCi�lp�t 1
TY1e Pau al Perg" ig in ;
any Special and this
e gxanciing triatosee �sseintent i
s k meal ptp
With the �G
' the Special permit
.1 e e l Pe�S[11tr ditto hs �e
�eoving p attach s,�ch con zo
7r ct
aP Auth° it mad d rsecessarY to P th(
Granting as a.e deem e of limitedguards toy
and Safe'
the steihck�oad such asp but �'
following si or reap Yas
' de t13i '
of front? �e u!red b s
a) Requirements the minimu3
greater thaTl
Yaw asking areas or
`E cree��it�� � oini_rtg
�tom
addences �
5 Re�fuire t,soi= the Pr st�cee'�� b wa�ised by
�}
. � premi`sthet �s oox�o°he�hdev>`�es ae ���cii= i
punting , aylting �uthorityi
the Special permit
tartar irate o
14odificati(s t the strtLjctu�e ;
c appearances of the
92 .�,.
1LS a Occupants
r
Lim,
odt ntimesa�e eratior�{ p1C extent
Of
meth
facilitiesi and location of
e) Fte9ujaLi0n of number , traffic
access or tether
t �fic gestures •
drives
under the
Pr lapsed con-
permit granted tO have lapsed after
3 . rpecial sha11 be deemed on Which the
tained herein the date
a two (2) year Period rot sub tsntial use
permit was granted ,pry esIf the ..plicant
Special has cam�nenced. use or con-
or constrllotior� why substantiakthe two (2 )
can show good case within
coenoed Author i ty r
str otion has nrxt spec Permit.' Graating err�it
eriod, the P ex tend the Special
year p mad eriod - included
at its discretio r eax p h er i
for an additional On ear period stated he determi�-
withiri the two { to purs�se o�c wake this
' the rinse required pro
of
i peal f roil, the p
ration of an ap
� - By haw. t mays within
rant,in�g AuthoKi y here
'i the special Permit ecia� p Cltl,t,S contained
the g for ..es whether 1ocsted on the
uidelknes wherever
allow acoess rin ipal use or "o research ,
l ins as the p with scienif io
1 sable 1at connection reduction pro-
necessary development or related p Authority
scientif is eoial Permit Granting
use dOes not
vided that the Po osed a e s ryublic good .
finds that the P ' from the
su# stantially derogate
date of the pubic
s following , AuthoriY
Wit�3kn (90) day eEmit ra ring in a der to
• the peczal P the matter
he action in
fare this
shall take final ermit p
special pre chalk be at least faur {� )
issue am The Gr ant ing Authoiy
zoning By T-aw . of
five ( ) members the the gpecial pers�it -
of the of issuing
M1 _ voting kn fa vo
r
the pr visions Of
Permit grantedr�ter until;
A Special of tak effect
-; this B Law shah n
a copy of the
Clerk certifies on
have elapsed
a the Mown (20)
decsirxn that twerst eat or that and
�rithout
filin�asfbsenan sd s,nissud or denied;
appeal filed
has been recorded at
The certified decision the Essex County
b) wner ' s expense in d in the grantor
the o of Deeds , indexed
. registry
93
k�
T
he name the record owner
u t
s
index
nder Cate of Title ,
the owner " s Certi
ar�d noted on ves istered
eoia permit xn lthe w er ' e,pense ,
If the Sp of tine
property, the decisior►f
w�t�►
shal
l also be f i�,od theeco�der
Land curt. shall cause
�rant�n�3 Authority'
The Special perMi. Author '
ins proceedings
7 . detai`led record on each
to be made a of each member up fin,
i-ndicatiFkg the gate tp vote ,
or if absent, 01C ,failing inq
question , and stting �o��h clearly
dicating such fact,
the t ea scn Or r ea sons • f s o f all whichr its sha the
official actions , oPie s in t-he office
filedrithin fourteen' (l4} dad ublic record
Clerk and shall. be a A for�hs�ith
of the Town shall be Mailed part
i4otioe of the decision loaf, to the P
toY�e petitioner or app and to every
designated hereixti uestecl that
in interest t the hearir}g who req s ecify
person present each notce shall P
notice was to be send. ursuantfi ed
that appeals , if arry ,
shall be madshak be i;
ter 4b�P� and
to Section l {i}hdays after the date of filing ,
of the dawn Clerk . s
with}in twentyin the the names and
Of Such notice
aksof contain cation of the .i
}ye decision shall
addresses
of the owner and rdent(f f ,r ian,ce i
land ar d or ,t uct�xres al ote ujremerkts for
l statutory req i
comPLies with the erti_tled oopi s of the ;
SSUirLj variance} .
sha" be filed with the a aad the
x
decision p,uthor Y
the down ----�
Special PetiRit granting
perk .
2"Lporary pc mit
32 a tem�orar Special
eais may grant a ericd not
Th oard of Apia ooc�xpanc r Permit for P a singe
Ferit r use or year at a time , subject
cone i t ions
more than o (i) ,miss sha11 be s1-1 the
renewal . ,,uch related to �' eguardial
shall be
imposed by the Boa t aft ed and zovided
the disc he Procedures P
character of win
yrocessd in accordance Specs perRjits .
herein fog the { rantin
als
10 .4 Variances and A owe, ,'
Of Appeals shad` have Power
Zan -
�Ze �3oa d the terTns of
La grant •van fiances f rot owa rig to circum�
ap to 9 card finds that
y Law
wsere
the
t
1
94
Al
I h;- Ai Fes- �, i *�•i.k. 5
kw two OLUO 4s
4 p p NOf L'kd JU+rDOVSR i r,kkin Mw
y ;'� .�. � �- ,' w MASSACHUSE�M wA�Aw1 Wsq of .'.
,R .}`i
# ,rF•F.. �},w,1.1 �.�i a 4�t11�S �
60ka CA 4wiGe L,tr'a o+� Novjc� of DECIS16N
. V
iYC. 11Fta. p ,2A
r•1 9$5 -
"
11�4' .t
39-.65.. ..
. ..,
i •.:k'' `• I}Fli 44 F10-img. Augur
r
]4n4u�.M*�ty.Trutt.
. ... .,
Pry,M IA§C� Special
,C���d.5tr�aetacr�vrit-a�- #9�.�,f����osL,S#�x, -
..,.,..,
th+�
aba" prk[FM der
;4`li�i { iJ 1x.ls of the SDrl ng ... ., .., ..
r ParAraP
FlL �...
., ., ., t,.. .. •.- ., .., -W�thjLr5,2 Q,-�aE4t:•.{k .�yfl ,• ... -
i a,�{ t o astr. ct oRs o # naK a*o€� el n exist 5tg buil$i�g A
■oa. t # � or a apacial permit to rIUmod A
i � s1�k Cochichewicic f I.a]c�- Coc�tiic�tew.ik.,
wi.tlLiA .150-faet� ,0 z
! }s bow dale,the&Hard of J4Ppeals vot+5d to
iiii n arikh0es* the $uildiA I[ytpatR�r fA 1Mua
TV,[
Vi[� .. � $QaG�al,p.gruni*... ... .,,. Fad herslaY
:w } ., A
P—At
r::? u n lha fokt0winj[ooMU60fts: , '-
for the w[[��r�+c4ion 0# Ih4 ■�'r+ work, Pa and 2Sfl from 1pka,
f:' '
r Pia be rev to ahow building be anutructrd beyond �;
{ � i _ The rotairtfnq wall
bhawn o[t th �ptBTIL inTM't-,a souu-t be tMaast torstieriofithe let
+" � 2 and 25p` fr03A the la�$urnpirt9estaCiaet which ks to be not greater than
h
s= far a sewer line and p in a lvcatiun t� be dat�rmiocd by
Cite North ,f"
20, ❑n e'reat pond Road, ricer to the
Andover Board of P4,bkic worka. gteI artd graded p
The €etal-clLnq Wall mane by corms` atructuKe theraoM A[t& b[s�ortha�Y
a corunRACO]nent of C [lstxyyCtion of any
I , uildi[s ge€[nit for �Cruct[�ra .i6 -i�suad..,,The,&oaxd, ug9
ermits may be required.
two building P ion.,or..savikad.plan, 8 -La,b ai Lowed ,rt
} 'z The parkir[g lot as shown on th�'p the ariat�ng :x.
t - within the JL'Dop Arid 250
4:
_ prior to the isauAnce of a Certi-fkcate-of be .00nstz cted on .
. . st he dea[oi�kie .
structure storel a[u y;lpae5t to.tl%B.J3 •xucCtrF! T n addition to tale t,
w- 6 - T1tiat a stockade €encc, b1,5ttfng the ltaganese proP�rt i
F. the noT '--� -
tko rGWa of bee{Jgeved whit pine. A APIN
- ! (continued on pegs
~i ,
Fag 2
Angus Tealty Irkl9t Osgood street
R Thtxt a1i of the walls of of prapoaed atru to€d be of tha CAM
pn,tarials, excepting gla-aS-
9 - What the plans be r"iaed and submitted to and approved by the Board
prior to any caststrLaction on the Bite. �
p - fihat necessary plans be &%ihmitted to the Building Inspector ahawfng : v
that drairkage from the score drains away from tba lake thro0gh catrrh
basins i�n Osgood street..
1.0 Y T1 LfAt trash rec1qptucles be enclosed in a masonry aalXe4 enclosure
with front non-transparent 5&tes- ;
ii - That the existing driveway to Great Ponk Road, OR tho aouth side of
#. tho site, ba demolished at the aria vstered to be a green area
which is not to be fertilized-
12 - The retaining +-rail shall he landscapdd as ahown-on the plan. ,
; i- '
13 - pagking lot lighting small be directed down.
* ' + PP11oation far sper~fa1 permit. for nx.iatinq building denied in light of
the granting of the speei¢k Permit for the above.
s
T139 Rvard fiflde that the provisions of section 10,31 have bears aatfafiedrIN
U.{.r I The Board has determined that Town sewn a will bu added to the elta(at
-. pre�4fint a sanitary holding tank system s being usedi which is of great
benefit to the situ. This Town sewage places this petitioner in x }
M1 f=
df lfeednt light from other.vita& borderirpt� the Lake's 4�atershed aisCr!cC. ,
signed-
i Frank SmriDf ,3 r., Chairman
Alfred E. Frixelle, 1E2q" Vice Chairmsm, r:s t
Augustine W, Nickerson, Clark R
Walter F. Soule �:i? '3
-E Raymorld A. Viaenzio
4
i BOARD or or APPEALS
T.
IS
L "�i,�
IF
f
+ r
I
" �F
set 24 u
1�; r.s i;.� : .;_+':,+'•.:r r.' rr is Town# Or NORTH ANQOV!!I
{ I t An a =8E Shah be f{Eed ,.
f i 4 a Y pA
wltttlfi (201 4pys after the MASSACHUSk' s
da#c Of IEiEM1Q (
in tie offee o! xhe Tavr+a `BOARD OF AP PF-ALS
;f Cterk: • =
I■■I�� a 7. ., -- ' atatembbr 24, 1985 •_' 't..
�q 4 �JI i.l..�l 4 _ r _r;x:_ :7 =`r,_fir [.' ... . .+ '.. _ '.__{=r i`r• ._ -
Jutgua Malty Co.
venial LQng,' Town Clark 1077 Gagpod
09lice $wilding Petition #]p "
North Andover, MA 01045
f ..FY II' Aear yMr, 'Longs
a Tho 13oa>rd of Appasla held apubiia haaring on Monday, Aug ust f2,
1985 upon the applioatfoa of "gus Aeaml,ty Trust. The haerfn7 was
{I advertlsad In the. North hndovaX Citixan on May 23 and 30, 19iD5 and r;l
'r _ all abutter$ +rarer notifi6d by regular mail. �hn following �raoerbera
I r were preaene and votings . Chairman Frank -Sarin, 3r. F Vice CklAirm#R a
Alfred E. Fritelle, Eng.{ ]4uguatfaa W. k�lckerson, Clarkr Walter F.
s cif. k Soulu and �Iaymohd A. Y vanafd.
The petitioner seeks a special permit pnrnuant to sactl.on 4, Paragraph
2: 4.133(41 of the Zoning pyYaw 64 as t0 parrnit �arymt€uctiun of a new atora
within 250' of Lake cocklichewick or. a gpecial permit to rercCO the t
t;l
existing building wi-thln 250{ o4 Lake Cociryichewlck..
The Board upon a motion by Mr, Fx'Lzelle and seconded by Mr. Sou]<e
I vfltea unanimously to GMNT the special permit baaad on the. following G.
con di tf vn 5 1
€'E, :t.lil ;,!;� ]; i Plan be ravieed tax show building be constructed beyond 250
IA +I I ' ill from lake.
2 , 2 - The retaining wall Ish<mm on tha plbn must be constructed within
15U' and 258' from the lake only except in the aouthsaak co€rtar
of the lot fog a sewer tins and pumping station which is to �s -
,F not gremt6Y than 204 on Great Pond Road, In a location to iro
idc,kerrtined by tt5a North Andover Board of publir� k�orka.
} The retaining wall must be constricted and graded prior to the
aomarw--ncement of construction of any Structure thereon and before ..
i •''' �:
any building permit for a etructure f>s issued. Tho Board suggnsta +
that two buildin3 permits may be resyu:rud.
s t 1 The parking lot as shown on the plan or iDvised plan fe to be
allowed within the 150' and 250' zone. 1
1 ' 4 5 - Prior to the issuance..Gf a careificate of occupancy, the axietft�g ;=w
. ; ,`r e.tructurejatore) must bn demolished.
s
�'+ a stockade fence, cloriest to the structure, ha constructed of
on the northeast boundry ab%ittIng the Ragonese FKGVerty in addition i
(Continued on. Fage 2}
yY-
p
u
ate. Anglnm 9
let
re
$,
.. �� i tl
to the two rowai cf atarggered whital idiru�em. -
1
7 - That all of the weulie of thhA P'rQPomsaai structure be of the: mjAme q
mm iaal�s, excertim� g
muster i aulss�,
That tint Plans be ra�eris�rtp and sukaraeitted to, And a
sY ha .aa d �rria�¢ t anyClovetrueetion on the mite,, ��r�4 d iw the �
g •- That ra,+eceassaWry Plans be' sobmritted to the Buyiidin �, � �
gy m. that drauirrauge from tiva� m'tca�ee ttlaa�i�m auwaar� �r�mr ttRrrm'91�ae�wa through
Ighow�in � w Ai alw�q
. � 10That-
ras rati ep mc'las be, enclosed in s amars'dnary Walled enclosure
„ 'With front non-trauuusi,^arent gate .
li - hw t thx exasting drivewaylA to Great Pond Road, on the mouth side
of the site, be a eftio:kished At the hr-EL avestered t���
1 �whichris not be, be fertil red, be: �w rams aa�r��
fertilized.
�u
+Psl m e lmcrdsa ae ea4 awm awiu wn on the, plan',
an d t e r n di arw n,
A3 �erixiva lrc�•t lig 'g � a rsct.ed d �'
, r
tiwr for ea
'r a �,���i m �" f" exi i,ting trul ldLAg daep��ied i light
uri true granting f time s,pleCial permit,, or the Above.
a . "t'iue Board finds that the r�
rs��,s�.e�r�s of ig W 31 huauuaar be:maw eaalti-ruf"iroald,
The ent,Board spas determined that TrWwaau se rsge wain be added to ttarr miteedart
prlefit t sshit&rygjt t,:eale� �u tank System, im bt:inn usad) uarhic�t imu �f great
�,�,� i� a�:.
SAY �a ru,eiFit to tyre Bait , This Town agew alge, Pleucem this: -petitioner in a
f dLffera nt light from other hites iorderiri the
rr , �' Laak 'u
aF Raetamrmivad District.
,
Jlruaweae �
R
BOARD OF APPEALS
e �W 'Jr'i
�Wr so-
�� 1
. Jr*
aai rauaa
b
-
W
,
f
,
'Mpd Ewa ��'
� n� Of from, � fli14d
47L k Iiw 6
TOM 0*11 ® �. �„ • .. 4 W Y r
p
_
�a
m w m
TM 0**a r
�, - r
_ a `
. I
a
�Vr 1'y
-
t
a
,m
s
_
i m
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEALS
January 19, 198
Thomas F. Caffrey
Attorney at Law P.C.
�. E� 1317' RE; Angus fealty t:orpM
P.Lawrence, 101842 1077 Osgood �� .
Petition; 39- 5
Dear AttorneyCaffrey:
The Board of Appeals held a discussion on your above-mentioned client's
request for an extension of Petition #39-85.
Whereas a certified copy of the Judgment in favor of Angus was recorded
in the Registry of Deeds on September 24, 1987, the Board voted, unanimously,
to EXTEND THE DECISION for one year, September 24 , 1988 as alloued by
Section 1 . 1 , Paragraph 3 of the Zoning ByLaw.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please tall the office
at 683-7105.
Sincerely,
BOARD OF ATPEALS
' ^
a tr lm ey Taylu?
Secretary
c c: Mr. Kenneth Mtn. Yameen
Ear. Archibald Maclaren
/awt ( %%i
CON, NWFALTH OF MA&SACHUSETTS
Tlyy
IA COURT d
s FYARTMENT OF Tffk,�T ,AL, COURT MAY
CIVIL ACTION
�
rus
R al Co , Plaintiff(s)
" V.
Paul A. Hrd,trcm,, John L. SiMns, i h W. l�jt u;h,e, ui�:]
Ie
and � �a, c
apt n �rrtn and Nlerabers
_. crux l of the North Andover Ill .r Defendant(s)
-14 4 and the Town of North Andover
SUMMONS
Town Clerk, "down of N,Qrth Andover,
i 73 To the above,-narnerlDefendant: 120 Main St. , North Andover,, a:q a 01'1�
You are hereby su�a�inu reined areal re uu.i.r l to serve upon qb r tr, J J . u, 45
ut�� 1 'i va.n
plaintiff's attoruue , whose address is Essex St731
an,
the complaint which is herewith serve upon you, within 0 days after service Of this summons. upon
answer
you,r x-
uupt�a�you, ex-
clusive of'the play auf service, if you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief
a demanded in the complaint, You are also required to file your answer to the comp Cairut in the office of the Recorder
of this colurt at Boston either before service upon plaintiffs attorney or within a reap nabule time tGuerea
dyer.
Unless oth a wise provi ed b Ruule l uu;st state as ua cu�uunterc aim man Maim which ua
l x uttr aaser tuu
may have aixust the plaimihich Wises out uuf the trarusactuuru or occurrence that is the stalajeet tnatteu-ef the
lr la.urta
cl ui.ruu, r you will thereafter be barred from making such claim in any other action..
Witness, MARM ' ' K SULLIVAN, Chief Justice, at.Boston, the,_ __ -,th ozy Of
in the year of our Lord.one thousand nine hundred, and e 19 h t v- -i cr h t
RECORDER
NOTES;
I. 111is summ ns is sS:uu
17,
2. " "'"hen PauPaant to Rule 4 end'the saeha -S �ua9es of C'i+�l Fr u�re.
one fern
morons is a dint is involved" the nau u;.s of all defendants should appear in the caption, if a ,sep to
a r w�elrpant each should be addressed t ;puair defendant.
3., TO II I '. �(1) EQUr"—(2) OTHE, PLEASE.CIRCLE TYPE 0FAC`rj0N INVOLVED
tr' SA
e
O , �
� < T,
;Y
Depot "
f , „'�a
COMMONWEALTHOF 14 AS. A HUSEITS
LAND COURT
DEPARTMENr OF THE TRIAL 00URT
CIVIL ACTION
No. 7 2B 2
s Realty Corporation , Plaintiff(s)
4k; C
N�
Paul A. Hedst=ran, John L. Simms, Brich W. Nit sche, michael l arY►
and George Perna, in their capacity as Chairman and tale e�cs
B .iire pstiyely of the I rth.. dover Plaming Board , I fcndattt(s)
A � and tho 'Town of North Andover
SUNMONS
-.c
.. k
� N
' -S To the above,-named Defendant; George Perna of 2BO Farnham St. , No. Andover MA
M45
You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon Robe r t .....,O' Sn l l ivan ,
En a
pl tifrs altorney, whose address is 3 4 oEssex $t,.,.. L w ren ce, MA .0.188 4 0 , an answeT to
Ir
the complaint wh i ch is herewith served upon you,within 20 days after service of this summons upon you, ex-
gclunive of the day of service. if you fail dodo so,judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief
d:manded in the oompLaint. You are,also required to fde your answer to the complaint in the office of the Recorder
of this court at Poston either before service upon plaintiff's attorney or within a reasonable time thereafter.
Unless olherwise provided by Rule 13(a),your answer must state as a counterclaim any claim which you
} may have,against the plaintiff which arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the
plaintiff's claim or you will thereafter be barred from m Mng such claim in any other action. +
Witness, iu1A ILYN M. ULL A , Chief Justice, at Boston, the �BthM —day of
May , in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and ei ht —ef l3t
Z _
RECORDER
NOTES:
1. This summons is issued pursuant to Rule 4 of the Massachusetts Rule s of Civic I"rtrc�[Ia<rC_
. When more than one defendant is involved, the narms of all defendants shoWd appear to the caption. If a separate
sumnwns is used far each ddeadsnt, each should be addressed to the paT6ruW defendant,
3. To PLAINTIFF'S A ORNEY: PLEASE CIRCLE TYPE OF ACTION INVOLVED
(1) EQUrrY--( rcff
W S4 C )
COMMONVVE,ALTH OF MASSACHUSETFS
LAND 1F
DEPART'MENI'OF THE TRLkL COURT
I II. ACTION
No. 12,8142
Angus Realty_ of ,., .,. . Plairwtiffff(s)
V.
; Paul A. Hedstrm,, o n L; Sins, ri_ h, W. itz he, �1 h�e� ar r
a uk: ;or Pp�ma, in the. r a,I:u t. r uairm n c� r
.' resMcti.vely of theNorth Andover Planning ward—, Defe dant(,s
and the Tug of Noftli Andover
SUMMONS
To the above-named efendant, George Perna °f 28,01 Farnham St. , No. Andover MA
You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon. Robert J. r u Y:t ivan
on 1'affIr......,� � .... ..._ _......
laintiff''sattoirne , �uoeadd. , o � �� � �� s � �r��c�, 1 ��� �� , anaswerto
the complaint which is herewith served upon you, within 20 clays rafter service of this suurraM0,119 Upon you, ex-
elusive of the day of service. If you fail t�o day so,,,judgment by default will he taken against you for the relief
demanded in the complaint. You are also required to ffile your answer to,the complaint in the u`affice luf the,Recorder
S of this court at Boston either More serwriee upon Plaintiffs attonicy or within a reasonable time tluereaffte:r.
:O�
unless therwise provided.l) Rule l; (a), your answer must state as a counterclaim � clam which,you
may have againm the plaintiff which arises out off'the tra nsactiro!n or occurrence that is the subject matter of the
plaintiffs claim or you will thi re°al`tter he barred from making .such claim in any other action,
'Witness, A .a.t.'k N MySULLIVAN, Chief Justice, at Boston, the, t�l-u a of
May m is the year of our 1,ord one thousand uuuuue huumired and jS h ty 7 i :,
Ztt
NOTES:
1, ' hii summons its i;ssuu Al pursuant hi Rule 4 of the Maassachuascas Rules of Civil,Prowduurc.,
. When more than one deffendant is involved, die ruatunes of all defendants should appear in the caption, if a separate
smna cams is used for each deffemda nu, each should be addressed to the particular deffendam
° TO Pi AINTt FFS ATTORNEY: PLEASE t=rtRtwLE 'YPE 0 FACTION tNV LVE
,,
.. -7
f I
1
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSAC HUSETTS
ESSEX, SS . LAND COURT
CIVIT, ACTION NO.
128142
Angus Rea Ly Corporation,
Plaintiff
VS * COMPLAINT NT FOR JUDICIAL
DICIAL
* REVIEW OF 7..O INC DECIS10N
Paul A. nedst rem, John L_ * FOR A DETERMINATION OF
Mmons, Erich h W. Ni Lzsche * VALTDTTY OF ZONING
Michael Leary, and Wo rge ORDINANCE CE AND FOR
Verna, in their capacity as * DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
Chairman and Members
resp ct.i-vely of t_he North
Andover Planning Board and the * :
Town of North Andovco,
Defendants
NATURE OF THE CASE
1 . This is an appeal of a zoning decision of the Planning Board
of the Town of North An ovc , and a requests for a
dutcrmination of the validity of a Zoning Ley-Law of the Town
of North Andover , The Plaintiff is also seeking a
declaratory judgment docl-ar. ing that a Special Permit granted
to the Plalut-1ff by the Town of North Andover Zoning Board
of Appeals in Petition No . 3 -85 which authorizes the
construction of a 65 , 861 square feet , two story Etructurc
remains in full force and effect .
JURISDICTION
2 . This Court: has jursidiction of this action pursuant to C .L .
Chaptcr 40A, sec , 17 , Chapter 240 , sec . 14 A and C Captor
231A .
PARTIES
. The Plaintiff, Angus Realty Corporation, is a Now Hampshire
corporation having a place of business at 1077 Osgood
Street, North Anc uvar, Massachusetts .
4 . The Defendants , Paul A , Hedstrom, John L . Simons , Erich W.
Nitzsche, !Michael Leary and George Perna, are the Chairman
and members respectively of the North Andovoi Planning
Board, and rcoide in North Andover as follows :
2
T 10Mas F.cnrMEV
Paul L. 2cd atrotlt John L . Simons
ATIWW""Y Al "WIC
30 uakw5 drive 14 Royal Crest - Apt 3
ippr".FSS STREET North
l Andover,
� �5 �y North
y� h�7� 01845
y p �{ {
LA 4'JRENCE.MA 4klSKr Nor. h And over, MA . 018 4 5 North Andover , MA . 0�8 4 5
air aa6-6F51
Erich W. rY ! Lzsche Michael Teary
1253 Sulam ,tt_rPeL 57 Essex Street-
North Andover, MA . 01845 WrLh Andover, MA. 01845
C gorge Perna
280 FarIlham Street
North Andover, MA. 01845
5 . The Defendant , `!'own of North Andover. , is a municipal
curport-ion , organizad undar the laws of the Commonwealth of
Massachusctt; , with a usual pierce of business a€_ 120 Maill
Street , Noft-h Andover, Essex County , hl�isCar�3��set_t=s .
COUNT I
(REVIEW OF ZONING DECISION)
6 . The Plaintiff owns a parcel of land located at 1 077 Osgood
Strout, at the intersacti on of Great Pond Road in North
Andover, Massac husek_ts , containing approximately 9 . 2 acres .
The premises affected by this appeal are in zoning districts
General Business ( G-B) and Business-2 ( B-2 } and comprise an
area of approximately 5 . 3 acres . The balance of Plaintiff ' s
land is zoned Residcnun -• ( R-2 } and ts not part of the site
for which site plan approval is sought .
on January 15 , 198€3 the Plaintiff filed an application for a
Special F'eEmit with the Town Clerk and the Planning Board
socking site plan approval under Section 8 . 3 of the zoning
by-lair. A copy of the Application is attached hereLo and
markcd "A" . Sections 10 . 3 and 10 . 31 of the by-lava sot forth
the pertinent- provisions for Special Permits and establish
the Planning Board as the Special Permit Granting Authority.
No distinction is mach hest_;,peen a Site Plan Revicw special
permit and ether special permits . Thu Planning Board never
adopted rules rolati.ve Lo the issuance of such parmit.s , and
never filed a copy of such ruics in the office of the ` own
Cleric. The Plaintiff ' s application included plans for the
construction of a 32G foot_ by 120 foot two story retail-
office building on the 5 . 3 acres of husiness-zoned land.
The Planning Board gave notice to all intcrest.ed parties ( by
publication , and certified mail ) that a public hearing would
be field on Thursday, February 4 , 1988 at 8 ; 30 p.m. in the
Town office, Sclect_man ` s Meeting Room. On the evening of
February 4 , 1988 , the h ari-ng was postponed by the Planning
Board for lack of a quorum and re-schadulad by pasting to
Pebruary S , 1988 at 7 : 30 p.m.
8 . At the Fbbruary 8 , 1988 meeting , the Planning Board opened
the Plaintiff ' s public hearing and receivud information from
the Plaintiff and from curtain interested parties . The
isawaasf.c FFtEv Defendants , Hedst_rom, Nitzche, Simons and Perna were present
TTOR"E:Y Al L^'" P.L and participatc d in the meeting . Another member , John J .
]!N} X-,.TREFT Burkc, was present and participated in the meeting , but i.5
!. WROWO MA 01 B42
GS f 01l6-4i54
I
I
no longer a member of the Planning Board and is noL named as
a Defendant t herein , After extenAvc discussion, the pubic
hearing Was continued by the Board to March 2 , 1988 .
On March 2 , 1988 the Planning Board resumed the public
' hearing , The Defendants , Hedst.rom, Nitzche, Simons and Fcrna
we:rc: pre:sunt and participated in the meeting, receiving
additional inf:ormaLion from the Plaintiff and from certain
interested parti_cs . Member Burke was absent , After
extensive discussion, We Board voted to conduct a sxtc
vi. i.t Worn the next meeting and to continue the public
hearing to April 14 , 1988 .
9 . On SaLarday, March 19 , 1988 , DefendanLs N zahe and Simons
met rcpr sc ntat-ives of the Plaintiff at the site: and
conducted a si-to visit . Present on behalf of the Plaintiff
Were: George Nammonn Ar.chihald D . Maclarcn, and Pamela
Yameen . After touring the site , Defendant Simons said to
George Nammour in the pretence of Archibald Macfarun, and
Pamela Yame}en, that he would vote: favorably for the site
plan only if the building were moved i-n k-he front- of the lot
with parking to the rear , it ( the wilding) was reduced in
size , the exterior was changed from brink to clapboard , and
thu root changed from Fiat to pitched.
l.Q . pn March 30 , 1988 member Burke resigned from k_he Planning
Board. On April 11 , 1988 Dc#cadant Michael Leary joined the
Planning Board as a member .
1 1.1 , On April 14 , 1988 , the Planning Board resumed the public
hearing . The Defendants, Hedst_rrom, Nitzche , Simons , Perna,
and Leary were present and partic:ipatczd in the mce:ting
receiving additional information from the Plaintiff and from
certain interested parties . The Board the a voted to close
the public: hearing and to take the matter under advisement.
2
Can April 28 , 1988 at a public meeting , the: Board voted to ,
deny the Plaintiffs application for a Special Permit . 3
Defendants Wdstr,om, Ni.t-zche and Simons voted to deny the
application: . The Dcfcndant, Leary, who had not been a Board
member at the: time of the two earlier public hearing
sessions , abstained . The Defendant, George Perna, was not
present and slid not Vote.
12 . On May 4 , 1988 the Board filed its writtcn decision with the
Town Clerk . A certified copy of the Planning Board ' s
decision is attached hereto and marked "B" . The Dcciwion is
totally unsignc_d and refcrs to a "Date of Bearing" of April
21 , 1988 . No hearing took place on April 21 , 1988 . Notice
of the dccision was not mailed to the Plaintiff antil may
13 , 1988 and was not received by Plaintiff until May 16 ,
T210MAS F-CAFFREY 1988 .
A r1 ORNL'Y A Lrkw-f.4.
�qp F w4r k�;I RFFT
LAWRENCE-MA 01842
01r bRM.457]L
5
Q 13 . The Plaintiff is a person aggrieved, within the meaning of
O.L. c. 40A, section 17 , by the derinion of t_he Planning
€ Hoard to deny Us applicaLion for a Spcc:ial Pcrf:lit.
14 . The Planning Board members present on April 28 , 1988 acted
f without a quorum prevscnt and lacked jurisdiction to decide
the Plaintiff ' s application at that meet_inq.
15 . The Planning Board failed to take final action upon the
Plaintiff ' s appli ation for a spacial permit within 90 days
following the date: of public hearing .
1. , The decision of the Planning Board to deny the Plaintiff ' s
I application for a Special Permit exceeded the authority of
i_he Planning Board .
s
f
17 . The Planning Board ' s decision is used on legally untenable
grounds and is unreasonably, whimsicai, capricious or.
arbitrary.
18 . WEREPORE, the Plaintiff respectfully prays that the Court:
A . Hear all perk_.i.nent evidence and actcrmine the facts .
B . Determine and adjudge that the Planning Board ' s
Mcision to deny the: Plaintiff ' s application for a
Special Permit was in error as a mat Ler of law and fact
and that the Planning Board cxcc :dad its authority.
C . Annul the may 4 , 1988 , decision of the Planning Board ,
1) . Determine and adjudge that the Plaintiff ' s application
for a Special Permit_ was constructi-voly granted under
section 10 . 31-5 of the by-law and G. L . Chaptcr 40A,
section 9 .
L. Gaunt such furthcr relief as justice and the rigbts of
the parties may require .
COUNT TT
(DETER INATTON OF VALIDITY OY ZONING BY-LAW)
19 _ The Plaintiff , pursuant to G L , c . 240 , sec . 14A, requests
that the Courts determine the validity of Section 10 . 3.1 of
the north Andover Zoning By-Law as this section applies to
Site Flan Special Permits under Seotion 8 . 3 .
0 . he Defendants, Pain- A. hedstrom, John L . Sir onn, Erich W.
Nitzsche, Michael LeaTy and George Perna , in thcir capacity
as t€ ambers of the North Andover Planning Board , are granted
ri K 3M'IA'V.CArFki=Y the authority under Section 8 . 3 of the Zoning By-Law to
ATTOA EYATLAVi.f.C. issue Site Flan Special Permits ,
NM MM K 5'f FILL 2
L AwfeF14L: .?d.h 131842
W7 G XV51
21 , Section 10 . 31 of the North Andover By-Law, a copy of which
is attached hezat.o as Exhibit "CI' , requires that ccrt_aln
findings must_ be madc bc:.t_or. e a special Permi.t_ can be
approved and it also empowar. s the Spoc_al permit Granting
Authority to attach certain cc ndi Kons to the: approval of a
Special. Permit .
22 . The provisions of Section 10 . :31 as they apply to Site plan
Special Pc m is under Section 8 . 3 constitute an improper and
unlawful exercise} of Lhe poiicQ power delegated to the Town
of North Andover because Section 0 . 31 purports to condition
a use allowed as of right under other provisions of Lhe By-
law, on the grant of a Site. Plan Special Permit by Lhe
Planning €3oafd .
3 , The provisions of Section 10 . 31 , an they apply to Site plan
Special cal Permits ender section 8 . 3 , exceed the scope of the
delegation of powczr gran€ed to the Town by GO . Chapter 40 ,
scc . 9 and the by-law as so applied is therefore
unconstit_ntional , null and void .
24 . An ac Lual controversy exists between the Plaintiff and
Defendants in that the defendants who are members cif the
North ' Andover Planning Board have denied the Plaintiff ' s
application for a Site Plan Special permit based an their
erroneous belief that the permit muat- be denied if the
conditions sat forth in Scctian 16 . 31 , 1 W--0 were not met .
25 . Unless granted the relief sought herein, Plaintiff will s
suffer i.rreparablu injory by the application of Scct.i.on
W . 31 to its request for a Site €'last Special Permit, for
which the Plaintiff has no adequate: .legal remedy .
26 . WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully prays that the Court_;
A . Declare that Section A O . 31 of the North Andover Zoning
By-law is invalid , null and void as it applies to Lhe
Site Plan Special Pcrmit_ required under section 8 . 3 of
the By-law.
B . Annul the decision of the North Andover. Planning Board
denying the Plaintiff ' s application for a Site: Plan
Spy}cia]. Permit and order the approval of: the Site Plan
Special Permit sub jcct to such reasonable conditions as
the Board might impose .
C. For such other rc:lie1~ as justice and the rights of the
parties may require .
J'F{ )MA',F.CAFFREY
ATTORNEY A L4W.N 4
3CO E_aSL)5 1 s IYF'F.T
a,a wrtFtKCF,MA OI E342
017 Elm 071E
i
COWgT 11 T
4PFC-LARATURY t.TUt_?OMENT CONCERNING SPECIAL PERMIT NO. 39-85)
2-1 . on or about May 21 , 1985 , the PlainUff filed an application
with the North Andovcr Zoning Board of Appeals requesting a
Special Permit under Section 4 , paragraph 4 . 133 ( d) of the
Zoning ley-lava , so as to permit construction of a retail -
office building within 250 ' of Lake: Cochichewi.ck . The Board
of Appeals gave notice by publication and ,nailing and set
the matter down for a puhltc hearing on June 10 , 1985 at
7 : :30 o ' clock p.m . at the Town Building. On Junc 10 , 1985
t-he 'Zoning Board of Appeals at a public hearing received
information from the Plaintiff and from various Town
Agencies and officials and from certain interested parties .
In particular , the Planning Board , by written memorandum,
recoirmendcd to the 'Zoning Board that the portion of the
proposed building within 250 ' of k_he Lake be removed and the
building enlarged c1newh€ire . The Zoning Board vote d to
continue the public: hearing to August 1.2 , 1985 .
28 . Uri august 12 , 1985 the Zoning Board resamed the public
hearing and received further information from the Plaintiff ,
various Town officials and agana i_es , and certain interc:stad
parties . At the conclusion of the public hearing the Board
vok_ed to grant the Speoi.al. Permit and to authorize the
Building Inspector to issue a permit to the Plaintiff for
const-r.uc Lion of the work sought_ based upon certain specific
conditions .
9 . on September 24 , 1985 the toning Board filed its decision
with the Town Clerk . A certified copy of said decision is
attached hereto and marked "D" .
3G . On octo ur 21 , 192S a certified copy of the Zoning Board
decision was duly recorded at. the North Essex Registry of
]deeds at Dook 2064 , Page 155 .
�I
31 . condition 8 in the Zoning Board ' s decision of September 24 ,
# 1985 provided : " S - that the plans ba .revised and submitted
to and approved by the Board prior to any construction on
the sitao .
32 . on February 10 , 1987 Lhe Plaintiff at a public meeting of
the Zoning Board of Appeals submitted to the Zoning Board
its revised plans for construction at the site . The Zoning
Board voted to approve the revised plans and to sign the
roviscd site plan.
2
33 . on May 8 , 1987 the revised site plant sighed by four members
of the Board of Appeals , was recorded at the North Essex
UNWAS F.CAFFREY Registry of Mods as Plan 110699 . With the plan a certified
AT 1 UNNL Y fs 1 {,nW v i
copy of the Board of Appeals decision dated SeptcoUr 24 ,
3CX[ FASFKS7REFT 1985 was again recorded at the North Essex Registry of DeWs
LAWRMCE,MA OM4
Crn May 8 , 1987 , at Book 2489 , Page 1£38 .
i
1
'I
34 . On January 19 , 1988 at a public heariny, He Zoning Board of
Appeals voted to nxtcnd to September 24 , 1988 the
Plaintiff ' s Special Permit dated September 24 , 1985 , a copy
of said Votc is attached hereto and marked "E" .
.35 . The Defendants, Paul A. Nedstrom, John L . Simons , ErWh W.
Nitzsche and Mi_cbael Leary, in their capacity as members of
the Nor. t_h Andover Planning Board, denied the Plaintiff ' s
application for a Site Flan Special Permit on May 4 , 1988
( see copy of deci_nion attached hereto and marked "B" ) .
36 . one of the reasons given by the Planning Board for denying
Lhe Plaintiff ' s application for a Site Plan Special Permit
was the following:
"There is no evidence .in the file , nor has the
applicant presented evidence at the public hearings
that there axists a spec.i.al permit for construction
activity within the wat.e:rshod district as contemplatcd
by the applicants_ in the application before us ,
I
The Planning Board has no authority to approve a site
plan under a special Permit application which on its
Case does not comply with the present regulations
contained in We Zoning By-law. ''
37 . Thn- Planning Board has erroneously Utermined 4hat the
Special Permit granted by Che Zoning Board of Appeals (No.
39-85 ) can September 24 , 1985, clues nut authorize the
construction activity within the watershed distr. .i,ct as shown
on the plan submitted by the Plaintiff wiLh its application
for a Situ Flan Special. Permit .
38 . The Planning Hoard has also erruneousl.y determined that the
sitc plan submitk_ed by the Plaintiff with its application
for a Site Plan Special Permit on its face does not comply
with the applicable regulations contained in the Zoning By-
law.
39 . The Plaintiff says that the site plan submitted with its
application for a Site Plan Special Permit complies in a13.
respects with the applicable Zoning By-laws and the
construction activity shown an said plan is authorized by
the Special. Permit granted to the Plaintiff on Scptember 24 ,
1985 by the Zoning Board of Appeals ( see "D" ) .
40 . An actual and serious controversy has arisen between t_he
Plaintiff and the Defendants , Paul A . Hedstrom, John L.
Simons, Erich W. Nitzsche and Michael Leary, in their
capacity as membcrs of the North Andover Planning hoard as
to the rights acquired by the PlaintA ff by the Special
A3 TOFih°EV AT LAW,PC_ Permit ( No. S -39 ) granted to it on September 24 , 1985 .
3W Lt;nA:X STREET
LAWR FW F."A i)%4�,•? .
r
41 . WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully prays that the Covert :
A . That declaratory judgment he entered in favor of E_he
Plaintiff declaring k_hat Spcci_al Permit No . 39--85
remains in full farce and effect and that said bpecial
Permit authorized the construction activity within the
watershed district as shown an the plan submitted by
the Plaintiff with its application for a Site Plant
Special Permit , which includes the construction of a
65 , 861 square foot two story structure.
B . That the Court grant such further relief as justricc and
the rights of the parties may raqui re.
Angus Malty Corporation
€ Rubcrt_ J. ez�l� ar
Eaton & C and l er. , P .C .
234 Essex Street
Lawrence, MA . 01840
( 6171685-51 3
� r
fhomas F . Caffrey
Thomas P . Cc"kUrey, P . C -
300 Essex Street
Lawrence, MA. 01860
nATED : May 23 , 1988
f
5=
3
z
I[F
7
f�
7HOMA F {:AFFFi}.Y
AI I k;I I�r\'A7 I AWE PC. S6�
3
STFiLC7
LAVIRL'!:Ct.inn IJ)K-.�
ry}i kkS-ni r i
f ANIEL_ Lo"W' �
1'hin applioatioil muot ba #ypaxrittari -,:F, �;.
i
Appliemi Angus Realty Corporatiopx Addteeis i371 Osgood Street, North Andover",MA
#. 1ppiioation. ie haroby made -'
(Side Plan Review) -
�a For. a Spoaial Pormit..U'hd0r.Saot o }, # o Zoning By-Law.
} � r� 8 .3 Pa2*n rah of L t
y. 0
. 2. (a) Fromigeo affeoted ux`o' land x aid buikding x rjumbvrod 1077 Osgood Strsat.
faro Lhe east side of Great Pond Road
(b) Prnoivao affootod art. prjoger•ty 4eitfx froattaga on thv North voukhX d�k
" set 5taa# Vidt. ?f _ Qsgaod _'_-- Straet, and knowm as
Lfa. 1077 Osgobc3
a) Ys`emieoe &•tooled ire.'IA'Z orilug Ditjtrfot , and the promisoa affaated
hkya as aroa 9f 2311085 (5+3A) Anil frontage afl- 2 `+ feat. _
3� Csmerin Lip l
,(a) Ifamo und' &4droiva of owner'(if ,joi,xat 0wnarBhip, give all namaa)t
Angus Realty CorpnratiGn
F. a). March 1b, 1960 E} 5tefanowicz Family Trn:t
Dot• of purohaaab) Feb. , 1984 Pruvioug Ownor b) Stella Lobel
(b) If applioant is not omor, okeek hie interea# in the promiaoui M/A
Leana0 _tr
Other (ezplaf_n) t,-
4. Size of proposed buildings 120 `t frost l 1.20° f foot dealt
11eighti two atnriaa;
(a) Approximate data of araotion 1988
W 000upanoyF or use {of e"h fjoar) first rcl"ail; second - office "
(o Tpa.ot 00notX-ao-tion 2-C With briek veneer - ---•-----
5. Site of LZIMking LFuildingl # feet- iront� 67 1 fast deep
Hoi&k tz two otoriou feet.
W Approximate data of ereation before 19613.
(h Oacupanoy or usd (of emak floor) l -- retail market
2 - office
(o) Type of constr iotion� pnixed -
__
6. Has there' baen'a previous application for a Speoial Permit from #}wo P wining board
on theao premluou7 YeB, transferred to ZAA for runt of jurisdiction ±_F.
f oo, when stay ,f905N.
-- -- ',
ti .---M — -_--
' .-. Deneripifon of purpoaa for which 6peoial Permit 10 $aught on 'thin potitioni
x.v Site Plan Review S ecial Permit is sought in
'the erection of a new retail - office builijing at 1077• oagood Street+
4
I
- _ as• land Catxrt
of DaadR 1r3 ]3oo5cb]I�70_�P.g�s 2i0 J .
{]. Dead recvrdcd fsl tha )300r— -
*jf Fage__. —
o P �
Ce�e#i.fic[�E$ N ,� ,�,�� ire
pinto uponwhioh l bane my appliaatiditi #>"a ae oi}o rai
�e principalP
at
in detail} in com llance with the- conditions
A Iicant J5a$ file- herewith ka s Che Zps1iYa Board of
contai.xled in iC� 5 ecial Permit issued h the
Appeals and in comV
fiance wittt all aPP,L,,bie provisioTjs o�
Oi11rt<f By -
l
4
a #o pay for ailverkiaiilg irk aeleflgaPer ktsld po�teF�;a fee far yiiing. 3cLaws-
gal
i afire {{ptin$ ire t eat'".
no{ pea to petitiokler"fl ei nature
? Corporatioo
C arney f r Ang�is �te-txlty rov�xd by the
' }lomus F. Caf f ey, tho 13oaxd ahall be made Un a.fo e a ;iQat�aR
sry aPPli4atiatt fox as#ial Tetrad by tha 0ierSc upon requa*: #G. Qeo1
„ po rd. ,oeo -forma tkr Ii be } liaa'tjoTi fGnn. llii information
tupar#ing to fo as appliaa�f0u shall be 'txeotesi fie mere xlotioa, pf intent on +
p on the t�la applioan Ln tho mo.snor #} araf n
�'alief +�til I�uah ti�ua sh�I bo � riaE}ed official EtpP
iLLn
oalled far by the tarn ' Wh'G l
prosoribod.
Of lava dirootly en hand d 30all p feet4
- gory appl.ipation ab�xii be. oubs�a%`oodO4rnCru with a 1,iot of "'Par�iea��nhttrldred�(� )
e ali inolude tbo pots orkert saw 1 the abuttcra W'"'n thr no ufth—
oar On most recent appiictt l rttoxnI tha Plast—
� fl-: priv�►`�a �trapt ar �suy a�td aiattter¢ to
of #ho property line all as #hay age ity Ur Own
of �y ov,oh GWer d *,t ed in uttitig i
q etandistg 'tlsat the � paTd. 4 £sVOry - - -
ning-Eioard of the tar,at and the piartuing
LIT OF FART'E i IR 111T SST
s
SVY'r
E - .
r4 .
}
5 M1
x
eg
a
LIST OF PARTIES IN INTERUST
Frank J. Ragon(cse 1939 Great Pond Road
North Andover, MA 01895 '
William T. Averka, 1657 great Pond. R ac
and Wanda J. Averka Nerth Andover, MA- Gi845
Joseph J. &artolotta 1� 5 {�xe��t Pond Road --
and M. Patricia E3 rtolotta North Andover, -MA 01845
Willi-am J. Driscoll 1815 Great Pond Road
artd Helen Driscoll North Andover, MA G1845
Simonrke T. Marchand 1-88i Great . l'ortid load
Nox'th Andover, MA - 01845
Richard IF. Parzlale 11.7 Farm Street..
Wakefield , MA 811368
OPTRX TRUST 2 Elm' Square -
c o William J . Dalton, Tr. Andover, MA 0181-
The Borden Company 188 East - Broad Street -
Chemical, Divisjor, Columbus ,- OFF 43315
'own of
.North Andover 120 Main Stru t -
Selectmen North Andove-r, MA 81895
Daniel A. McCarthy 1145 Osgood Street
artd Joanne F. MoCarth North Andover, MA 61845- -
1. r}r J. S ein exg 1149 Osgood Street "
North Andover, MA1895
William Haphey P.O, Box 337
Forth Andover , MA 818-45
Sophie F. llaph�y i
3254 24th Tj` rrac(� .5 .
Miami , Florida 33145
Fred L- Boucher, 111 45 French Farirj Roar
and Kathy A . Boucher North Andover, MA 01845 =
Anthony J. Longo
53 Preach Farm Road i
and Patricia A. Lonc} Norte Aadover , .MA 01845 f
Phillip A. DiSencdett.o 123 french Farm Road
and Mane E. DiBenedetto North Andover, MA'' 01845
-M-ir�hael LT. Sala
S-aIaC-h 63 Fre'nC:jj Farm
QF k Andovez, IC
` Daniel C. �c�agan � MA 01845
and Patricia A . Reagan 99 17renob Farm Road
John n ��ex�g�eon Nox th Andover , A 01845
�
grid Anne marie r er usorj
I-11L French Farjrt load
����xar� �:at��os North And ov,,r, MA 018 4 5
"
acid Catherine S. Stathos 33 French Faxm Hoad
Airport Commis",
f North Andot�ery MA 0l845
the City, of Lawrence 00 Common Street
City Hall Lawrence, MA 01840
The Goodwin Trust
C/o Russejl `1'readwell 13 Goodwin Court
Paul E. Alexander Marblehead, MA 01945
-
87 Frencfr Faxm Read
Neal fit. North Arid over, MA 018 4 5.
haAleigh
and kancy ShapJ eigil 75 FrenQh Farm Road
Narth" -Randall- Iiart ;-r� - r MA �31845
and a �1en '
A. ihighes Parm Road
North Andover, MA 01845
l
Edward
Rcard Of A �ha�r�rar�
ssessor;
k
Y
+�.• �F1f7YS7`� rl�� t377 ["4� SZF7T'I7YSfi#t wry ri rr, ."""" _ $ 1
I ii x
F -01
MUM MH
} MA A 4+ Y, T T S DAWL LONG
NORTH AHOOVER
Any appeal shaII be filed ;¢
Wthin { 0} days after the
data of filing of this Notice
In the Officeofthe Town NOTICE of DECISION
lent.
May 4, 1988
Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YY . . . . .
April 21, 1988
Date of Ilearin . . . . . . . . . . . . . YY . .
Angu
Petition of . . . . . . . . .`1. . . .ty .Corp... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
'Y'Cs3� S S affected . . RCi._ 125'and. . . . . . . . . .Great Fund Road Zoned- GB+and.B,2 . . . . . . . .
Referring to the above petition for a special permit from the requiremi2nts
.Section '8.3 of the North Andover Zoning �r
Byla
ofthe * * i , F { * , * i * + } , . . . , , . . . . . . . . , .
so � s to per€ it . . .q�nn.truetion, of a 6,�;8b1 sc�x�are foot cam 2ercial stTu ti y i i i
. . . r;d ,releatet irn rnve1% . .. . . . . . . . Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . ent . . . .
After a publio hearinfr givers on the above datc- , the Planning Board voted
to . dertY. . . . . . . . . . .the . . .site` plan review,application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Y . . .
- / ;
ATTEST,
A qua Copy
based upon the following; conditions :
Town aerk
Signed
Paul Hedstroia, Chairnian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
John Simons
Erich hTfC7schc
Mike Leary
�Lu t g_h q r See RECENED
DAM EL L043
John Simons rMad the legal notice - tu : ooen the public hear TURN CLEK tars f r em
the conservatin" COMMISPion ! Public IA t min t
Police Department . , ao abutWr to tho piqject , Dayfield Assoc iptyAL c-d IlI
I W 12 T'C? r e nohom 1an Offrej , 300 Essex "freh , It
I
rCPrQ5VTItInq Anq" Rya ' 02 "an Asa o"" ' Also present were Tom ILrId K011 YAME2QF1 ,
nwnerq , and N; . LALty , e0pino"r , of A , LaIlY Associates . Mr CaffrEy stated
that the proproud plans wgiv luc an office and retail building . George Perna
wanted norm backqeound up Yho vLte . Mv . Kally statQd that the current
drainage on the sito WAS insdpquAte . Mr . Caffrey stated that they had
extension from the Board of ApppaLn IQr work within the Watershed District
UnKI sep0mber 1?00 . John Siwous citQd that the extension was gvanted after
Lhe time had lanped . Mr EaCtrey stated that the Board of Appeal signed the
decision in February 19B7 . Evich Nitzschp questioned the drainage
computatiuns and tho 1"cresup of ru"-ofC caused by the development . Mr LSKY
stated that the rpco"fjguratjQn nf the site also generates additional draiQgG
i" the direction of the Ncr rimook pjoer and run-off would go down Clark
9trvet ' all Khe way to Wr river , 1hace is a 54 inch culvert installed by thE
airport . Pau ! Had strom ray v4 & ip"ad if s LrAffic study that hAd bpen made an
RoutQ 122 . John Noy . vrairiv Qooincqr , stocling , mA , is doing tho AraFfic
study . He S tatal QhA 4 thor a a; a appron ima he I Y 16 , 00 vehicles on Osgood S Uee L
per dayj 5 ,ydo "whinies on Arent PQnd Rgad , and South of the VtQ an Duguud
Street , applonimaj - 1y 00 , 00? znhLcJqs to Town per day . John May statQd that
Lhe anaylsi5 of vpF 7Ludy shoHPd a" a-_.ceptable level of traffic adding mi "imal
aMa -;j 1: r3 I- that
FE�u 1 �!; -§. Stat0q there would bw a problem if
someone Hope to tayp v jurt am cc Clarn Stvaet and someone taking a lefl,
4 C C�aTj i Yjq f P-n IM P!,k,.:e Fri 1 1 od site jputwher Boy) , o"Iy 95r iE allnwed
for both turri "g mvvvmenkn John NOV otntEd that there worQ concerns of sighl-
distance whon Enminq OW or Klork GPrpyt and ging left an Osgood 5trept - The
plans show 3 dwabig loft hA4d Hr . May s4ated that the conditiD"s W_
traffic "OuLd bo qn f a l Lonl !
Wo ophicIns V " tplivw at PEW time in the a . m
60 v2hiclQ0 e� iwhl "j in tile a . m .
126 vehicle! U"teriqq at PeN time in the p . m .
075 vehicles PrWry W the P . M .
MENU
The what�peak Vyuv - i n teau a F F,er r�ou r would be 4 :00-2 : 3O p . m .
. oc€� > rrq asl:lid
hat y6oK Woo rwoodF,j( Vli7 prciec. tirin. k€9' € ay stat 11 I W RP ojectio" .
inlay to 1?'? . 3';r- : rl+:r r"€' Gr rn� f'�tiid Po.�d , ari abutter , q�uestioned the d i n I a p
of the situ from tho 1a€ a . ,:FDh" S 'r ,rols que6tioned th ,y� ter�r2q����trerrrrs .
William Driscoll . 1011 G1 701 f-'viul Rfe . i,! , quest ionad th A tream and the cons k;_ nt_
running u f wa k_ar Oc ' O nO r h r {,Ad , t ^..ar d the lake and he a 1 an wanted to €c "ow
the elevation of f'oute 105 . N; . ally stated that the elevation was
approximat_e) y 100 ' . Thu .n" 15 cost narner of Great Pond Rc ed is approximately
I le+ ' . Wi l ) itam ['2res lt� i 5 , !r} lt. '.;C � i.r�]d ShreRt, questioned how many vehicles .Fryrt�:
Infk: and r- iq" t comi "Q Oct of the siFe— Mr . May stated the about a third of
thp traffic w „ t r}i",r rh .. Pd f on , th i ,": s went south . Paul Hedstrnm quest ionad
hhQ landscapi "o and dPgigP Scott Stocking stated that the applicant in tt's
notify the Airport t C;omm i _a € on and the FAA . € r Driscoll , Great Pund Road , had
cononrns aho"t the hetc. ho of the re [_aini"q being 20 ' high . He also stated
that there wa_, a right - OF' Y_Y to hin prop'•ert and that the proposed building
is req€ t on thy righ -nf--wAy, Tram Caffrey stated that if the right -of way
still ex i 5 is thar Q N'u ld On .7w&n ronrn fOr him to have access to h K
Proper- ty . �,r,tf'7n ra rs s. F=,ticrv�=° ' ;_+7 , � .`; ! ,].-1"i r�',f For Frank Ragenese spoke for €-si{'s
c l i enL . Nr _ RlyeoesT ' 's huq e waou Ld be 70 ,`net from the prEJpr nod structure .
There is a q"wv t i Qn n r fhv znv i og t- i th the jog an the planks ShDWn as the bacl_
side of the build !"? , nd i !_ it 041 L r ystc' gntial as OPPOsed to Bus'ness-R .
Attorney €sari€iat ja - Ey n PaV _o F_ 0 Vh" would use substantial problems with
rygnr dram to 10 d r r S I . wv ' cp j -.._ 9 im ak"d to 1-f3quir'a 55 , 000 yards of g aysl ,
He also aspe`.r '.eta €. a_hw pw -.Iy w,'r.isr: 1pq" ire a one story building rather than {�
two story €dui idi"q; Er i •_Q , I : a_ ._ Echo questioned the parking and the squarr�
footage an vspoil rd i r 010 F+ :- 1 ,1ns— Roplinant is following the 1981 Zanirt,)
Bylaw . PaUL E-ret.l_- 0C 011% a$:.r . -,;-'j L,,.,.4, tllr.-y were using the 198 $y1aw5 Stand ard-
and do he foal r_k... t it r, r-, - r'��,y_ , ._" nor i" place at tha €; time fur this
�raTESLt . Hr [_.3rf1 r7 ' fAt-" that he f -Ceived a lutt2r from f{]wn [',ownsel
=tal into that '.-'as 2 k r-' r.' i r• . . I *s ; 1 P"ar" , 75 French Farm Road , que.3t ianed
why thn F]r C+pa=s' +s.• F:I 7 I. - h , `. to h l ^ . min not included in the discussion of these
;Marrs . Mr Lar fr .-",: if.aLFm `.€ a i } =F< nott elated to theportionwfrich i
being develo_s+r. d . F..,s1 ° r4" i i L r _m -: ntl-fd €,hat the parcel is 4 . 2 acres If la4l €
a"d in three zc3nky dkst' i ,.: tn, R FM 2 and 68 . Frank Ragenese wanted tt.e
k �7EerpUtation fC£vM rr"ui r'-,- , -_ k , anard1ng the zmninq f7 eeZE . William Chepml i =
stated that , list t-4lu l d a`epu.id 00 the of the Board of Appeals Permit and tha "
3 bui lrlinq :-001d "OL on r{1'wnl i -', vd u" ti l f-yns; nuction was completed . He also
asked if MEFA 33=sr.E N1 , KL1 4 ; skated that hR has filod with MEPA,
Ff my FinkraF1.= = t1 JF,r-.'J `;I1•? � ry..k : '`IJf `ec s•_e the ahutt1ng- i{}oe - John Atf4onF
tac t that did put applyto Ehis can, and read that section from the Bylai-: .
a'l0 rz[ C•I : By J?.)hi,. S i!r,•r1-IF t+: r-+,r,t ; „u,_ thr} pub L is hear ing tint i 1 March F , 1980 .
C}TE : Ui-ian i"lute 7 k I'74 .� q3r'
John Bui-Ice Le*-
.-SECOND : Er is h Nk Lz=;t:he
VOTE ; UrlaoirpioS 4s of those pr rE� F ri
RECEWPO
UNIEL LEI€ G
Sgfe ' f = Sgypd". ': at" tp Prg1a {Fr?}f Lf'N] - r6 C13f _Fermi - ` dk# L3} Ci ve4vairs
3 3hrk Simon-a 1 -3Fr t i7 .' k f 2 FL r!7, I. i r_E2,:F 4;ci elpe Z the pL_rt, I Ec Rear 1 rT f,�t. terS 4 elr -P
r PcPivr--d' aakd 1`�3 r.f 1 }..,� r~ t ;h�' R-0.-IT d 0 tfCL,7L r -7kn' CC? Ak �tt 5linn ,
See heln i l ynfe l d , n ` �aih-1 LOy rot _I%) N 1 1 '1 r;riCf w_js pres.en , a"d spoke to the Huard .
Attorney Clvnfeid {=l,.ti PH k_hah hn WO boon before the Planning Hoard on Sc3VPrg1
Qcna5 ions ah1.r1 be l : r' .'n7 th. l oil qw'_i t inns reined by the board have heerl
addreS Rd . r3i part ! '.,' i'""w:v thak had ycb to be addressed was the 1=AR , We -tnar
area ratio , and that hal 509" 2ddrFssw1 with a new Farm A Plant .
Paul E fed•_ 1;! um nEvnj i r Cho o p E -t"n , :-h i nh the Ward has reviewed , have treyn put
on the Form A f= iao . If! fr.,.-d said that they had been, showing the total parcel
which in RAM fert lakyot .
George pvrna sEupnt l a7ned tpc 70rn!_ on do j qriway permit with ra e4Dnal - Nhy .
Attorney Clvnfr l d {. # a l'pd r ha t the issue was huctugh t before the Hoard
previously . Paul "vl7tyow st'aa:od that the detail i3 111 the recordn and VhQr-fz
Mao no veot.00 L" r pr,nak. 1K" Hnol d , Uich Ni tzsche stated that nnrrnal ly •_UME,
7.0T- t Of tl7 E:l parties involved is m,dQ relative Or-,
thr-.' C{72Tkr? on Yr i '..i{?', o-. Qt ! n, "P; C = vh4teij sated that an agreement has, bE'Ro
ubmitt+ed a,W a'r"' 3--.1 rr_'11U9St .
,lack 1., i ndo" . �" ,. . ;r.. � i- . :' ' f . . . ';1 -5 hed if the now plan had th" vamL%
foutDrint an kl- p pI . " w ,. !_ wa-- anpr , 'ml VV the Conservation Commission .
- ! P k oo that the o" s „ difference was the r 7 ze U f the Int-
bpim
Paul Hed` two Mat - d 1 -! !.ho 1 u`r- !°, 1 9 ,ctural disr lo�LLr es and the rT1,�tttr '=
{_rJntr3inod n— too _ 1 , 1o,j rho 1ss- pnjiLconverheZ1 inq e7T'e incorporated into tihP._
rr_cord for ! ," =" y 1: ri n _ _! k1 ,.iI; t ire rjf_cFslUn far C;}iltR13n driveway cared slW
plan Wall hF have! a" 11 ; U1 the inn _i makinn that is in the recurd a"d i e_td
into 1:ho TeLotd rI7 Ith! 1s" in", f.r, VAT nia" iIlfC}1-'mntian .
NOTION: Bv, jon , !; ! -pro to - t4 "hi jr hr_`ao inn and take the matter U;tidoE—
SP"f:€. MU : Cerro^ F-r
RU t.Cfr 1
Mr . Thr3man Caf 5 PY !- in r' P,ul & o,Kt p,-. ,<._"ntt d the 1 navd wi Lh copies of his
response nse to I `-'. lu W OUr71 i , on ! at ',hg C. nb7 ual y Oth rFip t i ng , From a letter 3eW
by Scott . 'hack oq . 1iwn Fton„=._, , Hi , CaF `roy cited that there was twenty- two
± =191C?3 1 iq .ud thr ap a r wh i no , mo, e time is "eedL- d to address them . The Tows
�' ] atrner l ±l� nF i : ;=.1 F"�•r3 I i ,ice „I i{3i' L '. �ll'_3i] in a 1 F t t Q r t[18 : WaS Ser-It k0 M
Caffrey .. QHP " C 5hp i - m_,= the IF {=['i_}r: a l Permit and is it St i l 1 valid . Ht
U, ff,,, Tjd t172f_ yho .ppjjr. .nt t.3f'o5 thu pusition :flat; it is valid . Another
i SSlle Lt1as 4- hat w": 1. was ne If i .._ed ! " Lhq Roar d of Appna] S Special Permit a"d
Han the sewer line ; n lud -.l " r'f3 f_:-if FjgV skated that it cantainod Lhe t• orV
identifipd =1,j 3 � r ., � ,f,,._„ the p; . that was recorded at, the time and it
dW e. plicitl � ivc ! : ,dI [ ''r- ' =j jj "w ink une " the condik: lans in the de n `3 i ,
and Fhr f'2k,1mn - 1 0 V— I '.I '..ki f,, 1 1.1 ,�:. f� } '3r' . 1j" t"r queFf. i or1 cif the €ui-b-"rLJt , I'll' .
r,jf,,, � , id { ypi i ' ,'y•- 11, jo q' .'s'= Fjoo :'"j an important one and ham.' WUUlrl
address l i 1040! 1 , . l.I ,z"" "r0ktl I '[:7 . I�' i ',hLf� 2.OIi1T1C1 I'll' ,
Caffrey t, tWed 140 , q „,., Cod j , i ,'p'! Tww" Meeting to change part cf `vhc_
site to U F ._OWK0 , irs " i ' ,' Cyr - mr- r-I ecj jnq the cea_ ords of the 1904 Jr,,.,t.
ME-F' 'tin :3T5r1 Rr,(lzl ,1r• rkr_ `2'= r4, C-if i rov f�-_ ] F that the I irle, f.-,hown On the p1an5
is exactly thr 5.1+ " A� "ll " t r eh 1 r:1h w-i'. {.haYI❑J?d F r? 15e4 T nWrt n 1f_% and the
warrant a t iC ] .. 13ANIL Q Kr,
TOWN C K
Hu Q I er F3o. 7 ;.�7w f- 1.r1 t ' d ,
MAY
28
Wikh regards to , a,-F•,'kt F. of ti Q-imf !"q right -of--way Ranemnmt . Mr . Caffrey sak
they I-rava "sf}t5o" ! t no Lahr sty " - i P pion .fir co l r.Fca tee and t'hP net Tesu k t in
their orlini 's i - n"n, il r• aln . ": -11-s_ ty in anrRSa to r11good struev . in fha4
the h- ight -of--r. AY is _-_r- go" q - !t;, ral- i sure paved accQy, to Ongl]od 94ruwb -
mr . Caffrey sry1 T -. d t h- - 's r'a isn" s raised by Scott Stocking . T-60nh
planer- . .Zt& ri ! n Tf ino schedule . informatien will be howri
Q5� rrIe lla?'T r7 ..' i. id:• I: �; = "a{ °.f}z'-t,� I ?I r I Fr 1-lTE L;' thv apraILzab I ZaniTi; }- lat . t35 =4 '
S^ ... £_'1; L'_itant at i`'rr.• I' im, lkp '-vrf' a pur'mht was jSsu*d
On the is=ur, OV Ff'!}yiPq 010 l .AWI a "g f']hE'. `_ize Of the fL-"c_ L' at "IP Rr3Q+Jnevl.?
property , Nv _ r_ap roy ._ l n I;+:''-; tna F it was I mbe led and it conforms to what 010?
Coming Hnord i c,rlrri , vd[
On thf' E' E i° la l "9's ?,, I } - '_-: rk ; * S,s7 .,t ] 1 ] on f:r Raa Flcini;J Poad . PIT- . C-.l f rS`ey Said
r-,. he tw, ri l thn t'_n ! 1 3•- 0 J! "_'a t f o"d Road was largely e l wgndwd and
that �k3 e a r -. 7 I'. -. - - - '3 Y
oubotantial 1v shi -.3lln t4_ . 71± :' r'ow Q Eat Pond Road and that the final groum,f
elgva ions ?I ':F Uri On f- la"r . f' sg that all finished grades on the 0 O-
ak a vhowu ;Sid thn 0 [ .3,1'_ omy U4nk Rho ] a awi "g i nck can accamodiaLy trl.il7lr., . F i r E
bats and Ft4rdraotE anal ffx[. t. _inh C-cap 7lQi' are on the plans .
On the que'3 !; iovk 7 ' a;hl_? .l1 -f]T_ ; 11a-j . Hr . C.affrey deferred and said that Mr .
]_-a l l y Z.IFO r Id 3df1VOS7 f h" i YsmT , b"t Kgar i c a l t y it would he addressed thk-o"gh a
sPapagn pit to to i " = r-,-} l1nG _ M . U A F F -p y vtatPH tkiat the h a n l C a i
facilities wi t ] nut I.lf: "pa" fccm thy root and will be jot_ated taward Me
Cantor .
Up the sign i sn n , Hr .. rah t F, nv slid hhaL at E the i nform mo t i o n an the s i pn
d€- tails that as e s . al loam, Me si :P a"d location, Foot not the namo as yet .
When the nams i-i G Qv i n For rria h i u" on the number Of let Fars in net
avAilable at this 4mv and they cah4nuh cr7r9ply to the detailed requirements of
the sign ordinance :and thO fOr thR d;E_nants signs - Where they will be ]waled
and Uhe baSir ti ' ZF 3 : iOc?111, i t iEd ,
On the icsups of utI t 1 Yjaq , My . Caffr-ay,' LgreaEs with the final d sign OF-
mat pr , <<E'we aimd t" {=oL' rrNatp - dt _] l "oop sys tern meeting approva1 of the DPW .
queskioD r.3f dwE. yr }- 7'7f!Cz : r_. FE: br-D LiCr-..1 i'i-air,age Iiman and WaterS 7 Loes that
em ist on onr]rud r_ti rpt , "t . Lal j y {ran ovesent to addre a a the issue . Grynce
t i aps are Sflr_Iw" an ♦-f - 00wal 1 i "Ps For all co nnoc o i ng res t arL13.n is . A dram
drain qr vasFinarit "nu .ijj k- sl'-r.:r= 3 ''_qd fyum the attorney Qf Channel Bui lding a"d
Per Caffrev filed i 1; 'link Vo- Huard . Technical work needed on the draft but
W i rr, Cho The drainage des i.F3n has been prcownted
to the EcArd _
kho time rrtn'='-+.I I "q { 1' -mn 5: r: Oi ,S_5 r-it culat iOn Of traffic and Se"age P ' t for
thq =prior Az& Ff a VV--_ iI, ] VOIrs 1 i +. 1. b_- Lween uht new sewer line and e} ist1 %
wt ter I i "F_' and 1 -;;= C -?1,s WM'- rev ] Sed to Mae t tyke Boar rj
ra�1.13 rf''.irgE'll�: .
Gun ❑e Hamn•- :'- -.1�' .�� I..��. - ".s.� 'r'4 I �„� r.l1 '-i.-r.i oIans 0r t1le entranco change whi01
moets Gtztr'_ DVI + "c', . 1 -0 -'paue t t� e Huard ahout th" tr-arf is
15nues . HpI' ._: "z-r„ ''-!} I Yl :t-- m.'., i' wi rb th State DFW and that the take hnrr
a f- j � 1.... I.'}r- " .. , I.- , I •' I .". F r ; + (-?n {l--gnrid street, noft Viand kurn� 3 .i"n.,
�r'711L`_S ,h_� t' _
: are prappood in J=` hQ fho 'iyy mo G-'mc t into Clark StFoet Occur 7
{ kte, .. � L
1n the pyrIv mum " i -v ,.[�[ra• ! !"- -;Ii�_po ' "q L_enUar- is nut jTlRV�'�fj!0 Pie
Lr� SJ S l 2 P OF W.-
loft hand 1 ay"n " {'y rfr,r{ I r ,I , DANIEL LDHO
TOWN CLERK
}��RTH ANDOVER
3� : ���., _•3:� t' -� at
}� 4� }� 4
the. s..t.atpv cat- or," "n, ,', I rI", I - E �: "and twin lartmAl xd FKe imoas_ t Q a
the entr _}per ',' ilh v" !nFi "o U;n , ? j"al1nod intersection on Orpat fond fond .
11're r evisod p I a"s tIv, 4 r o"! k „ E Cho S pnl scant wor l,. ing with thQ 5ts3te DPW
ohn Simo '.c qlJf-"4 Sr"ed 1.,4y- n Q"Y i_.[a tTr had l in* was . 14F AlamOr- is Showed John
the location en i_?{,.- gl .:yn . .ra"- Ann rG4.ipgftoned thQ location of the r tainin
Wa l 1 . My €'!ajay!- i n.; i d U;a v it - �.s__ n F i l l behind the VOW r Wlf frir l i tin , VIr .
t+tZifo is alao r. ta {'po 4hg4 !h- : r'' 4ail i ;W wall was diffQrQnti . Joh4't metaled that-
it Was not pail o ! k ho Q, i n i �a l Mr . Namor i S said tha k it was S L i l 1
r)Vr?4- 1 L� r ! , ear`i tttf- € -.0- r-
€aul Hedstrvw t-i_ir.i.ul k.fir:5 UoIrH— - MTWnFv relreshed on the €' iztary of thr-�
nvecial permit . in . ':'`=_''ors, in _. _ id no-cut . no fill 150 ' first Lime .
John s'.7iman-"s ?d;J`"ubl `.)"! ! Q;:'• 0 ,
=.srca h inq paved . Mr . Namaris said that
there would €J-_ u" °_"y li ..1r .-_ ,3,t,1 ill the back of the la[-uper- ky . .Jah
ajEv quos t ioz -od poi n 9— hrrf "e- F Wad r ad -u i k . Mr Caffrey Sr3id that it via'
Q Wd I"IZ!'"ch i n . 1 "PC . ;nkn _i Pe d in Qnr" Won the Board of Aplari l s made
r1' okr deci - in" . 4, _nf n r' . ', I.' tk—d that Wr"' dvci `3lon was made S+?pk:e'mbnr- 21 .
€ 9H5 .
i
StonyFri'. " ' ' I �. Fr, j fj rkF" (-a f F r my that the cur rent zo n i tig Iine L
Ei-B is fine i.,ndcr 1_i,, a ',f',=� i.,l �, ! .,i�a_ r 1. 1C= 1e , A[I error" in SLJrveying the
13a ❑�}e4- ty l 1 t�S� }�".]'- r:f'r 4'.'� R_r,rJ 1 i � �2 , '�{ ?2�!143[5rar3 S favor ThF` ELEV 'er'lt: plans sr-Luk4j
thr correction . F i ,_t', €.; ; tznchy : I {S 'ood thet an eanument plan Gould be
recorded with the -py' t & pr„ m U .
Frank RaUo"Pve. ak' " t i on . nOMI r. on the I` E an"i nq Board and gage them s amc`
L higknry on the app1ica1' "n ni " Wy tle Fri `sluwinq items recorded on tho petAl '.'a
} that was f' Wd with the T7Y" t_ 2" 1 _ ( t ) nine of the building 365N108 Wait ,
12 } hoight of On "wil,ii "q . 3 mtuiy , 2U fpat high . Mr . Raganese alEo } k LL-d
that an Jpp yo[;he _-''G l '%., - spRT i a l permit waq granted with. th i r' teen
conditions , a ne of W '.'+_tndil- iu= was that a revised plan be submitted for
approval of WE .=t`a i og pr+ar d of lli7pc a l w . Also that a year and a half later
the plan- worm =uUwiytcd VD Lho 1-kovvd of AppFalq which substantially modifiRd
the special permit: W_ t was qr .anted Ond There was rice Puh l iC hearing , no not it:
to ab"t tiers ar,d 001Y try ,,c i dgnt ter_ fOumd it recorded . Mr . Ragonese reque_ to
that the Rn ar d v i" i t. the nity . nr i i nq the size of the building W IDe O ESCed
theme and how UIt� E.' nd ri '_oo nomisrr.l r.i[_ wn Gcpat Pond Road to Osgood Street . F'
s t r es=ed {:t tira k. t' ic F i 7" W F hr ht: i l d i ng was tan large for the parcel and
that i t was theL -'f o� a }+ 7'. s+ s I_ } . A"a ther- concern of Mr` . Rac]fsr-es was t h '
ma ter UoN i no on WIRE ra"d rand .. Mr- . Lally woke t4 the 90aFd abou L th'?
=urface Hater and 17''.lu"N ,-_l{'ev .. A tairallaw seepage pit has been put in W
divert tt• p {-!Her- ' vow the s <+I E= . 13i 1 1y St OWPd GOUrge Per Via the IMati.0" o'F
the pit of tar I . - .r"V-. I_ LW"_..,I ''k _ 3urp t j "ri'
uaniel RC`r o" . 7 F r', r r 3 I'7,! -.r1 zr_.4i, 1 "d to know how far from the French Farm
a ] ' be w or'ir ncc F}•[ i yi q W'l" Id to, € r . Caffrey said that it would b
t1;LI P S0ff'p c1i " t li '. r
'Butt=Eier Quy I pi n Play: 11..v1yp�i rui;h ' d
RECEIVED
Kho 5tr nm ,:' ; 4"A 1hol Vhp .3€P if Onl ha ;#t? , 000 squ � �
that faq �}�1- xni f� } �
Paul Hed�l� is i nit?t? Pilo n�-r,r:w, n an! that i t was �� L��af{y
eo ale to �:€ f:t`rlir:[3 ta}+_3 '=11- F I. i r Z i'r t"Er-a1 � for the
ve 'opment of 't€Yt=
ort_,r_ess . 0 s Or F J rr, t -: =s. = Lunt +e r" i_., Our dec i s j i It s l W r-c. Of the
zoning enti3,; inoorlr• 1:haL _+r. pl rr.-n"t has to get s 3ia i appvnval . in thi -,
particular r_aEe 1 ; ] A c - to th- --€ra n i n l permit . The history or the special
pRrmxt3 includes a vFPTf € d " ioh, a r&iwit was granted , never signed , plans
coming in R:o yearn IvLoi too thn b" ding , lots of issues . Paul also said
that it was a buildioq €rat"±fk' +_ t.'-`d by the zorIng of the permit is valid .
F"El- . Wi l l j .Am Dr iscu t ] , t:a-yny Pu"d F o3d abutter , qp❑€ e about the Stasileyvi l 1p
Road € o nlov wale a about part of the problem with the late is
the house's a" the h i I i and €:€y foot F, Lha t' they are on septic systems . which
vemv V imes breaI.dr_ran . T€,Tra ar r r i c.ah o L�o ten houses along Great fond Road Va
are isolatRd f l tail.` -RHor i'".,{= Ft-w" . H , Uriscnl h stated that the i- fight-0f —waY
has been used by hwn ry anu i [5rikRat qch i c les to [lain accyss to his PrOPPr• tY
Wcauge such vph i r- s po +_.31'm; t gain fir:+.:ans from GI-eat Pond Road . With thc?
Jecatinn of t€ o rinht -^ f -'.•nv an thr {yvopaned plan , Mr . Driscoll said that sac°
vehicIps cpilaf 1~-�3n r!ot agl'0:17 his 3Zvoppr ty -
Paul Hedstrem c: : `.vO 1vno onir;r i _supg that Mr . Driscoll Nai bring up , ( 1 )
si f;uation with iI•'.'- r' Ight n C 'r! - And f 2) issue OC sEptic Or sewer capa{ : €V ,
The issue U o is outsidQ the scope of the prnposed
oT'oje t and ;I ti+ls r € '..I q, a' ran" I ',v"i F]r=1.a.fns" t.ho aQp l i cant and abutters . Tlw:s
right--of-"l- v 1c_507 to to "Kor"r.+=_";"o by the Bnard because it cuts across khfle
NF . { �3f'fs +�v Fe' ? l- I.'' . 1, l:h'? €i': d did iv-kt have jurisdictio" On the issue Of the
r ight"-ac-Wch"}' . it in ll'.1 t I 1rrS}'"dPd W the Deed ' 5 orf ice .
Jack Linden . cosy" vokin" rYr",la'wis inn . stated that an Enforcement Impact RePQ1
€ ad been subm i t I od t" th" Sta kc' a,rd C yni ed . He asked if another rwor t had
been f i t ad . My . 1111v na i d t h j 4; it of E in the process of b i ng prepared , Fh-
ma jar- issue "Ov 1_s' 0 7f i i r - 10 . K i nden n i Usd an es"'sfounement order- filed On
Decemhyr R . 17% fun weir l: Kr-IIIr.=, ill thr3 f: acI qu -t SeWe4- l IrN�- . A N0tiCE-' D
Tr,:6y"t was art co 10 hq f i 17.r Fg 7unpymvot:e "eklands that wrrE;� altered on Lhe
site . At this lima Ile_ lS:.11', [ 1 f r+tiF OOQ" 00e . Conservation has nut approved
of any mur [ ta � tlrr :. ._-{� ' , ` F11r3
Frank Raqony7w •_rlly 3 O 49 7 ; .. "I T W OH that work had beery .done an the property
3 4� DF'C-C"'i11byV 12 cc ? 2 , i `'q . "".': €a 1 I 9 og =iekr_ar lines across the property , withal]
Wm i t
nhn Simons r;AH w i i r-•}Flcwr i -; nertli the ma wive size of the building . Erich
Nitzschr u-,.9zq'r_^r q ! I' r"}1 I}_ d'1i r..I1 I",fi r- ' 9}1t--OF—wa .
MOTION , N, T,555'j r; . ,, ,5,'s,= 1 ., , q ; ,v"- Ehu oubIic hearing ror I weeks fruerr Mac ch
31 d _ -d ? 4. .. _ F hor .'1 r_ €'v nent meeting .
TOE C�. R
NORTH NNOM
PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM THE MA C;H 2, 19$8 l-I4 RE P&rp, � +
Tom Caffrey stated that the Mass DPW has tentatively approved the
access design to tEie site. Be passed out a letter to the Board which
outlined the items still to be resolved:
1 . Test pits Co be done
2. Sewer plans submitted are 75% complete
Mr. Caffrey stated that they were lAnable to proceed with the project
clue to a suit from are abutter and lack of sewer access. John Simons said
the time period for the special permit clasped prior to the extension by
the Boars! of Appeals.
George Perna asked how the applicant could change the easement . Mr .
Caffrey said you could. Paul wanted to know what yogi would see from a car
going down Great pond road. The applicant showed the Board photos of the
model from a special camera.
Erick Nitzsche asked if they have filed a Notice of Intent with the
NACC. Mr. Caffrey stated they will file soon. He also spoke about the
3 to 1 replication -= requirements by the NACC due to wetland disruption
along the rear property line.
Jack Lindon stated that the NACC typically TcquiTes that the replication
be placed on the site iD the area the original disrtLption Ocr_xiTed, He :also
stated a concern that the wetland altered is part of a wetland system which
rugs into the lake. This is a ve€y sensitive area and the NACC; would review
this matter closely.
Patl Hedstrom stated his dismay that a wetland discrtkpti.on has occured
and that an Enforcement Order was sent over a yeaT ago and that nc action
was taken to resolve the problem. Mr. Caffrey stated they did not receive
the order.
,hack Lindon continued apd stated the NACC would ,hike-Ty require a 50'
no disturbance area and 100' structural .setback frnm the- wetland due to the
sensitive nature of E:his wetland and its relation to the Lake,
Eric Nitzsche stated that hry he}'ainimu r.t e-=app iCarrt would be- required
to refile his site plan with the Board, after NACC action.
Scott Stocking stated that the 3-1 'replication ,requiremew-' would
place serious impact upon the site plan before the Board and would likely
require a complete redesign of the plan.
Mr. Y aneen asked for a 5 minuta race so to speak with hi.-. lawyer. The
Board granted his request and the meeting was .suspended at 4: 45 p .rn.
DANIEL LONE,
The Planning Board reconvened at 9 : 55 p.m. TfkWX Y AAVER
RX
Mr. Caffrey stated he was disappointed- in the CoIR11 f
Linden.
Frank Ragonese , an abutter stand he disagreed with Mr. Caffrey.
He stated that:
1. Angus has modified the plans twice wit€i no nonificanion to
abutters; and
2. The way the application has been reviewed by the Town Dees.
has been inadequate .
He submitted photos to the Board which snowed the wetland disruption.
Paul Hedst:rom stated that the issue before the Board has changed
substantially with this new in.0 rmation and asked what the action the
Board wished to tame at this time .
Erich Nitzsche stated that the plans have been changed substantially
from the initial set of plans submitted and they -are now quite different
from the hoard of Appeals plans. Also NACC issues need to be add asked
fully, which this plan does not atnempt no do.
Motion to close We hearing and take the mattar Weir {advisement,
second by John Simons, vote was unanimous.
Scott Stocking stated that the decision was scheduled V be issued
during the April- 28, 1988 Planning Board meeting.
Oct April 28, 1988 the following members were present and voting: Paul
€iedstrnm, .Sohn Shorts, Eric Nitzsche and Mike Leary.
John Simons shade a motion to deny the site plan application, basEd
upon the 7 conditions outlined in the draft decision before she Board.
Brig Nitzsche secondRd the motion, The Board voted as follows : Paul
Wdstrom, John Simons, Eric Nitzsche voted in favor of the motion. No
members were in opposition to the motion. Mike Teary abstained.
MEMO
PAW VONG
TOWN WJK
SITE PLAN REVIEW BY SPECIAL PERMIT m DENIAL BUTCHWAY PALAC E
4
Upon review of the plans and information submitted under this site plan
application by special permit , the Planning Board makes the following findings
as required by Section 10.31 and Section 8.3 of the Zoning Bylaw:
a. Finding that the specific site is an appropriate locatiun for such
a use, structure , or condition; cannot be made due to proceduyal and
substantive requirements of the Zopi-ng ByLaw which were non addressed
by the applicant in this proposal before the board.
b. The hoard cannot determine from the information supplied that the use
as developed will non adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood.
c. The hoard does not have adequate information upon wbich to find than
the proposed use will not present a nuisance or serious public safety
problems to vehicles oT pedestrAans of the suroundi,ng area, or to nhe
community at large .
d. The board finds that the proper operation of the proposed facility is
not assured by the information before us .
e. The board an the special permit granting authority under M.G.L. Oh. 40A,
Section 9 , finds that the proposed project is not in harmony or compliance
with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning ByLaw.
Upon reaching the finding: cited above nhe board votes to deny the special
permit for the following reasons :
1. The requisite zoning permits to enable the board to process this
application for site plan review under a special permit are lacking.
The site plan which the Zoning }hoard of Appeals approved on Sept. Z4,
1985 and extended an Feb. 10, 1987 under a special permit to allow
construction within the watershed special permit district was for a
31,402 s9vare foot one story structure (plan dated March 28, L985
which contained a retaining wall outside of the no cut buffer zone
of 5OG lipaar feet.
The plans before On hoard are for a 65,861 square Edon, two story
structure (plan dated April 14, 1988) which contains a retaining wall,
within nhe no can buffer zone of 565 linear feet and placed in a n€tw
location.
There is no evidence in the file , nor has the applicant presented
evidence at the public hearings that there exists a special permit
for Constyuction actjviry within Lhe watershed district as contemplated
by the applicant its the applicaKon before as,
The Planning hoard ha;; no authority to approve a site plan ender a
special permit application which on it; face dues not comply with
the presfint regulations contained irs the 'Zoning Bylaw.
BUTCHER BOY MARATPLACE dANIO13
ULERK
N kT 1 AN
`�A 28
The board further finds that the btest plans be ore ens as cited
below is not the same plan Qurrentiy in file in the Registry of
Deeds Office (plan #10699) which is related to the special permit
granted by the Board of Appeals,
2. A complete set of sewer plays were not submitted to DPW for review.
The Board cannot determine if the proposed sewer design meets OPT!
standards duq to lack of information.
3. Detail plans regarding the natural spring ori--.sita have not been
submitted no the DFW for review. The board finds that the potential
adverse impact to the Lake due to inadequate design for the spring
requires a more derail and nomplete review.
4. Conflict with the proposed drainage pipes from the site and a major
wancr line which currEntly exists along Osgood Street has non been
resuived to the satisfaction of the Board or DPW.
5. The applicant has altered a resource area along the rear property
line in violation of the Wenlands Protection Act . The applicant
shall be required to replace the wetland disturbed by 3 times as
required by the act. The replacement area shall require the movement
of the proposed structure and rear loadjnR docks . A new site plan
showing these charges should be submitted, which is in compliance
with an Order of Coadirions from the NACG.
6. An Environmental Impact Report as required by the state was not
submitted concurrently with the application before us. The board
requests that the MEPA process run concurr.antly with the Planning
Board yavzew in order to coordinatfi with state ageucies which have
jurisdiction with this project .
7. A detail Traffic Impact Report has not been submitted to the Board
studying the current design of the access to tha site. A Traffic
Impact Report sulrmiund was for oho original access drive, and An
board requires a aew Traffic Impact Report based upon nhe new access
design.
The following plans hall be deemed to bn contained within this decisi.=
PYann prepared by McCaren Associates entitiled: Butcher Boy Market Place,
dated Oct. 15, 1986 with the last revision done on April 14 , 1988 ,
Drawing No. L-1 , A--3 (elEvaticns) dated 1/1.3/87 .
M. Anthony Lally Associates , Sheet 2 orKNed Details 6 Profiles, revised
,fan. 1987 .
_ 11 4 4
EXCERPT FR M NORTH ANDOVER ZONIVG BY LAW
i
i
year , the Zoning Board of Appeals shall organize �
eat a Chairman and le;rk from within its o
mei ership.
The 06 th of terms of the members of th m card of
' Appeals s 11 be such that the term o one member
expires eao ear . A member of the B rd of Appeals
2
may be �removc or cause by the Boar of Selectmen only
after writtr c ryes have been ade and a public
hearing has been d.
Vacancies caused by di iss resignation , death or
any other cause shall be Illed in the same Mabber as
Zoning Board of Appeals ern ys are appointed .
} 10 . 22 Powers of the Boar of Appeals
I
The Board of A eals shall have the Ilawing powers :
1 . To hea and decide actions and appea - as provided
here '
2 . ' o hear and decide applications for appr,opr " to
Special Permits and variances which the Boar
of Appeals is required to act upon under this B
Law.
10 .3 Special Permit
The Special Permit Granting Authority shall, adopt rakes
and regulations for the conduct of its business
relaFive to the issuance of Special Permits . A copy of
these rules and regulak_ ons ;hail b(2 filed with the
'down Clerk . The rules and regulaKone shall contain ,
as a Minimum a description of the size, fc)i €m,
contents, style and number of copies and number of
plans and specifications i_o be 5ubmi t ted - and the
procedures for subrrWtori and approval of Special
Permits.
The Special Permit Manting Authority may grant a
Special Permit within Lhe framework of this By Law monly
after holding a public hearing which must he held
within sixty-five (65) days after the applicant files
for such Special Permit , The sixty-five (65) day
period shall be deemed to have begun with the filing of
the application with the special Permfk= C,rtantjng
Authority . The applicant is responsible for
transmitting a copy nf= the application for a Special
Permit within twenty-four (24 ) hours of EhO filing of
the application with the Planning Board of the Board of
9_
Selectmen and to the Town Cleric . If an application �nr
a Special Permit " to be filed with the Board of
Appeals, the appli.oant, shall file the application with
the Town Clerk , who shall transmit the application to _
the Board of Appeals within twenty--four ( 4)
10 . 31 Conditions for Approval of Special Per"
1 . The Special Permit Granting Authority shall not
approve any such application Or a Special Permit
unless it finds that in its judgment all, the
,following conditions are met:
a) The specific site is are approA'ate locations
for such a use. , structure , or condition;
b) The use as developed will not adversely
affect the neighborhood,
c} There will be no nuisance or serious hazard
to vehicles or pedestrians;
d) Adequate and appropriate facilities will be
provided for the proper operation of the
proposed use;
e) The Special permit Granting Authority shall not
grant any Special permit unless they make a
specific finding that the use is in harmony
with the general purpose} and intent of this
By Law.
2. in approving a Special" Pctmit , the Special Permit
Granting Au thor i Ly ray attach suc ) conditions
and safeguards as are deemed ne essavy to protect
the neighborhood such as , but not limitcd to, the
following :
f
a} Requirements of fMnt , side , or rear alp
greater than the minimum required by this By
Law.
b) Requirements of screening parking areas or
other parts of the premises from adjoining
j promises or from the street, bY wails , fences ,
planting, or other devices as specified by
the Special permit Granting Authority ;
e Modification of the exterior features ar .
}
appearances of to structure ;
E
I[
I�
92
d) Limitation of size , nuiitber of occupants ,
method oi� tiMe of operation, or extent of
facilities ;
i
e) Regulation of E comber , design, and 10oation of
access di� zves or otheK- traffic features .
3 . Special Permit granted under the provisions con-
tained heroin shoal be deemed to have lapsed after
a two ( ) year period €lout the date on whit h the
Special Permit was granted unless substantial use
Or Construction has commenced . If the applicant
I can show good cause why substantial use or con-
' S truction has not commenced within the two (2 )
year period, the Special Permit ' Granti_ng Authority ,
at its discretion, may extend the Special. Permit
for an additional one (1) yeai; period. Included
within the two (2) year period stated above , is
the time requii;ed to pursue or wait the determi.-
nation of an appeal froin the provisians of this
By Law.
4 . The Special Permit Granting Authority may , within
the guidelines for Special Permits contained here--
in, allow accessory uses whether located on the
same lot as the principal use or not,, wherevicr
necessary in connection with scientific research ,
scientific development or related production pro-
vided that the Special- PorEalFt Granting Authority
finds thaL the proposed accessory use does not
substantially derogate from the public good ,
5 . Within ( 0) days following the date of Lhe public
hearing , the Special Permit Granting Authority
stall take final action ill the matter in order to
i asue any Special Permit_ provided for in th Ls
ZOninq By Law . There shall be at least four (� )
of the five ( 5) members of the Granting Authority
voting in favor of issuing the Special_ Permit .
i
6 . A Special permit granted under the provisions of
this By Law shall not take effect unLi.l :
a) The Town Clerk certifies on a copy of the
dcci8ibn that twenty { 20) days [lave elapsed
i without filing of an appeal or that any
appeal_ filed has been dismissed or denied ;
h) The ceri_iei.ed decision has been recorded at
the owner ' s expense in the Essex County �.
Registry of Deeds , indexed in the grantor
Ir
w{
44
index under the came of the record owner;' ,
and noted on the owner ' s Certificate of Title ;
c) If the Special Ptvrmit involves registered
property, the deciVon, at the owner ' s expense ,
small also be filed with the Recorder of thL
Laid Cori r: t.
7 . The Special Permit Granting Authority shall cause
to be made a detailed record of its proceedings
indicating the vote of each member upon ca h
question, or it absent or failing to vote, in-
dicating sYch fact, and setting forth dearly
the reason or reasons for its decision of its
offkoial actions , copies of all which shall. he
' Filed within fourteen (14) days in the office
of the Town Clerk and shall be a public record .
Notice of the decision shall he railed forthwith
to the petitioner or applicant, to the parties -
in inte€est designated herein , and to every
person present at the hearing who requested that
notice was to be- sent . Each notice shall specify
that appeals , if any , shall" he made pursuant us
to Section 17 of Chapter 40-A and shall be Filed
within twenty (20 ) clays after the date of filing
of such Notice in the office of the Town Clerk .
The decision shall also contain the names
addresses of the owner, and identification Of the i
land and/or structures affected ( if a variance � }
complies with Lhe stn.wtory requirements for
issuing variance) . Certified copies of the
decision shall he filed with the appropriate
Special Permit Granting Authority and the Town -I
Clerk . i
`1"0 32 Temporary Perma�
Th card of Appeals stay grant a temporary Special
Perlrrit r use or occupancy permit for a period not
Mo3;e titan o (1) year at a time , subjeci t a single
renewal. Sk3ch 5r3nits shall be sc�bjec _o conditios.s
imposed the Boa . 3 latec3 to egi)egrd i3)9 the
character. of the disc t aff =ed on�� °aha 1.1 be
processed in accordance wi, " the procedures pr.ovidQd
herein for the gsantin Specs permits .
° 10 . 4 Variances and A als
i
4.; The Lo Board of Appeals hall have power
ap to grant vaKances from the tetras of: this
Law where the Board finds that owing to W reu.M-
f
I
74 I_l
SEP
{4 �t ov N RnI ANDOVER 7rss I�a}4�rtly 3hd Cxpyty(�
¢[t+ce � 1k� MoTiCE OF DECt516m
- _ VOL
of}Coring--.August.12+"J 485 ,,
%M c� ,.,An()
'�-'T57lAt-.,',".,., .,
str�et..known"a�,.l�" 7. sg.Qa ..
special ixerredt a
I
,y,y..'i: ) Referrin.L to#h• aL•o'k*pe-otton for IL g�IMM tha rogWirtmeastF of ihs"$3'-"C ,Qlt-" .Varaqraph ,, •%
331(l) n e 20n'Fg By aw6 ---,..
",..,f.�„ "..,.,,, "..., -
a.
kI t*pit constructiOft -off,a-�terr,,s ores- ithil5.u xfL "feet"bu lain
+GI Cochichewi,ck or a special pormit tO remodel arE uxist3ng building
}:
. .""...,,"". .-
;...0 withxn'+�`QCoc�yictea.icx %vested t# _GTQA.aT- th+
".,,
«; *;ter pubilt�ucerirs� givam on {ho*}nova date tbaoar3 od llpP `ri
11.� ;.
;.,. $ ecidl.Pqf did horE3sy i17i1}4 riid She 84tild�tt[ iEteq3actar #o ham■ 3t
. . ".
pormitlo ".AP�1ux..Rc�1Cy. ,TL]a ..",,..."".. ,
4i'i' i k for Ehe oar��kruckion of the gb,"work, bbeed ktpo4 EhofollamindConai []":
f3`.:'.� r 1 w plan be revised to show building be CorE::txuct�d beyorsd 25E}` in lakes. "s
S F_j f 2 the CLain7nq wail shown oTi the pla[L Emtst be Constructed witiyirl 15 °
and 50' from the k$kc pniy .except in the 801ttheast corner o the lot
t station wh�cl'L is Co ba Spot Veatex than ;r
for a gaWei' iiTse and pumptiil-ty
2p on Croat Pend Road, fn a location to be cieteYmin d by the t�4rtit
3;';i Andover Board of p1Lblid WDrks• c ed end r�aded pr o to thO
AI-,-: i. 3 The retaining wall must bs: corrsi�rmd t g
eo: eilcemeilt of COFlstruotioFi 6f Arsy utruCtute thereon and i1efE�t"e arts' _
building permkt for a Er --is .isaUed....Thy"�os�F .s,u4�i sk. t}laG
' trwo building permitm may be required.
{ The parking 34t as howrt on the.pFa:l..or-xevised-piat�Ais..tQ.be- 'al.i4tred
within the k50 ` alid 24` xorte. the"ar€6 ti ng t�
- j
5 - Prior to i4 issuance of CCYtifica£e.of.pc;rugancy.,.
; stFucturC {sto.Ce) rnu::t be deMojkrlL:d-
y i.
k 4 - TiLat a �tockdde fence, buttirtt t42EettxagoneectprapertyeiT3saddition4to tha
+' ;- the northeast boLu]cl]Y .".."..-,. ..".,, ,±
_ two xcyw� of staggered v:hitO pine. . .......�3 dafAzPewah'
{continue � oil Page
."7 _ Jam•
- tY
7}
2
As1gus TCNlty Tru3t - O:goad Street -+
`r 7 That all of the wails of the Progo9ed otruckure be of the eama
gnaterials, auc:eptxetig glass.
g _ That the plans be rcuxacd and eubmttted to and approved by kho 130ar4 i
}ku prior t0 ah�+ cOngtKucti et OCs the 91t . ,
7 g - That necessary plans be submitted to the Ajkilding Inspector S3Lowinq ,
.;, that drainage from the; Store dr"ns assay from the lake through catch
xy.
basins on psga❑d Street- '
That brash rCCepuCles be enCkosed in a masonxy wails enclosure
f: With front nofk-traTLspsr4:mt ggtea.
ik - That the exi4ting driveway to Great Pond Road, ott the souk bide o
the sit0, be �3eraoli�he-d at the area veatal�ed to b cjreen aYen
s j' _ which �s not to ba fCYtk I'z",
Y 12 - The re`-aintng wall ^hat' be landscaped aR shourt on tYsC Inn.
i '
Parking iOt kiglsS:k119 shall be directed down. .
•. Agglication for special permit. ftir e3Cistin5 building denied in fiyhY. of .
n the granting of the special Forma for tho above.
The Board finder that the provisiorss of 5ectiDn 10.31 have been satisfied. _
+. The Board has 'determifie$ that Town sewage will be added to the Rite{&�
pre4ant a lianitary boi_d�ng tarkk system tr. bcin5 used :rhich iS of great
bnefit tv the site. Thits Town sewage plc this petitioner in h
e 1_,J
different light from 0th4ar.altes bordgri09 the Lake`[+ WateXchad pinLrieL. !.$
' rratik Berio, .7r. , Chair yen ,.t-i
., AIf red E. Fri ae±i_fe, 8siq.# Vice Cl�af rman'
Auguatind W, #ickarsgonl Clerk -
Waftor F. Soule i
Raymond A. vivenzio
}. $OARD OF APPEALS
s fawt
i
r
r "
#, F
g
X r
. 1I1a
...:J z $ K 489
15.
Do'J'a Lon
H01}f ZNa'OrY€R/{
;,�t _J,'s :frv-' :: _. 'TO or NORTH AhlOOViiR :
Any spp8al shall be filed _
'rvithEn t201 daYs after [lr MpSSgciill6ET3 .,:..
daW 01 }E.Eng 0 this NORCA
r xti ; 1n th9` {lice Of titia Town BOARD OF APPrIAL
'
r4}v cfCr�L r1r. 5� . .. y 954,
e
er
Mquv Realty Trent Co.
Mr, naniml Lon ej, Town Clark 1077 Osgood St.
rpi'i _I Town Office Sufl� ng PEN titfon 1 39-85
.,f Barth Andovor, FiA 01945
Dear Mr. - LQnq1
fig I:!`.lj
_ _ The Board of Appeals held a public hearing Oft htondby# August it
rig ' :I : 19e5 upon t3ta appliu6 ioft of Angtua lRealty Trust. The 1�ea,r#,rrq was
advortiised iri the North AndovoY Citizen on May 23 as�td Or 9 5 and ;;i
axl'nbuttey:q wero nati fled by regular mail. The following rnembera .3
were present aitd v[7tingi C3tairmart P£ank -Se-rio, Jr., Vino Chairm&n
Alfred E. Frixalle, £sq., AUgUatIns W. N,tckerson, Clark, #halter F.
- Soule and Raymond A. Yi�ven7io.
�t h `{_ The petitioner seeks ai npecial permit gursuaiFt tv Section 'fir Para€�r gk5
,. '°' 'r #,l33{d} of Cite Zoning SyLaw �tr as to perrnit canatruCtion of a new gears
" within 250' of lake Cochx chewicY or. a special permit to rertioc:c_3 the
ex bufldireg witEtinv 250' of Fake Cachi.cbewick-
+I a: ; .,] yr
i,
:t_ = The 90ard upon a rnotforn by Mr. Frkzelle and sccanded by Mr. Saute _
vokks Unanimously to GRANT the apeci&1 permit based on the following Jrr
r
cunditiara '
-' r}' f � Plan he s-evii3ed to chow building be co[5uti'+�cted X3eyond 2�Q' - "-
�� from lake.
�
2 - The retaining wall flhown on the plan mth�C be ccPst=ructed within ,1
to f54" and 250' from the l�5ce only except in tE1e outheaut Corner
the lot for & sewer line and pumping utat#nn which is to he *_ +
a :
a ;i;j; _ not greater than 20' on Great Pond Road, �n a locati❑n to Ina
� 1l;j :determined lay the North .Tn43over F+onrd of public F%o&s-
EI „ .�- 7 - The retaining wall mast bo constructad and graded prior to
the
,.� cojnaertccmCnt Of construction of arty structure tllerean and bofarg
any building Permit for a 9tTuctuV' is issued. The By Yd sisgges ti
What two building peKmits may be required.
The j}arking tot a;3 Shown on ttsC [xlan or revised p3art is to bv '.
allowed within the 1501 aald 25p{ znnae
g 11rior to the i�suance.o# a Cart. ficate of occupancy, the axi9t ng trt
atrltcture{ :tore) must bu de-3rL0 L hcd.
�I I °,r - Tk�at a stockade fertoC, closest to the structure, be curtstructed of ;
i i.�� _�,i; on t3te northeast E>oundry aklutti.nv the Ragorrese property in addit3o� _
,. i . , .
jContinued on Page 2)
J'
rl r-
41
&Ity Trklst 0SLgnQd Street G '
VII ` I I
to ti,e tWD rows of staggered white pines.
F
I'tS a'
- 7 That all of the wa119 of the gropa ed structure ho ot the nameMaterials, excepting
excepting
H - That the plans be revised and submitted to and approveil by the s
* Board psi#ir to any construction an the site. ;
�'r... 9 That necessary glnFxs 3]e submitted to the Bgxldinq Inspector 6hotifng
that drainage from the story dral.ns away from the lake through
catch basftis on osgoa�3 Stre '
et. � �t!
10 - That trash receptacles be enClbsed in a masonry walled enclosure I .
with front non-transparent gate9.
ll - That the existing driveway to Gxeat Pond Rrsd, on the sO,ath.��de ;?;;.
of the site, be dernoliri}kod at the area vtatered tube a t3reen areim .
Which iS not be be- ferti"liZed.
The ret4t3 ning wall 9'etisl2 be landscaped as shown on the plan.' `.,trt
13 - Parking lot lighting shall be 43i.rected down. 2[[[( }
3--� :�ppplic�tion to{ special permit fo[ existing bui]dfng denied in light
-. a€ the granting of the sgecfa permit for the above. ' `i , C
.,,
The Board finds that the provisions of Section 10.31 have been gatinfied.
The Board has dotermincd that Town sewage wiU he added to the site{at
present a sanitary holding tank syst(!M is, beitig ¢sed) w3,iclti is of grestr t ?j
ber,afi.t to the eitn, This Town aewa�a places this -pnt#,tioner in a �
different sight from otblat gives bordering the Lakelg Watdrubed Digtriat.
sincere
Frank Serio, Jr.
s Chairman
:.ti
` 4 /nwt - E k r!,Ek
lh'7 is IC, S��h+1 A g; i IY
dlap,N�,,Jr 1 diikILIW rev*1 a, �' 'S i
4. A >i: ' I'�f
A.
Tanta Click;
Rooar ed ]day 8,1987 at 1.24pM #14123 -- * N4
2 T f
t
I r i
� ,J
. . . � ��22% .
TOWN of NORTH ANDOVER
` MASSACH USEFTS
BOARD OF APPEALS
January 19, 1988
Thomas F. Caffrey
Attorney n Law, P.C. RE: Angus Realty Corp.
P. D, Box 1317 1027 G.sgood St.
Lawrence, MA 01842
feririon: 39-85
Dean Attorn.cyCaffrey:
The and o£ Appeal, held a dime minion un your ab man tioned client' s
request for an exte.nvion of Petition #39-85.
. Whereas a cnrtifiad copy of Ge Judgment in favor of Angus was recorded
in ohn Registry of Deedw on September 2§ . 1981, the Board voted, unanimously,
to EXTEND THE DECISION for one yea:. SupLember 24, 1988 as cello wd b7
Section 16.11, Paragraph 3 of the Zoning EyLaw.
If you have any gmpetiona regarding this matter, please enll the office.
at 683-7105.
; Sincerely,
AR 0y APPEALS
Audrey
Secretary
CC: M. Kenncth W. ¥_ems
M. Archibald Maclaren
I
I /a n
�