Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-07-09 Application-Phase 3 Brookmeadow Office Park i APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN RUVIUW SPECIAL PERMIT BROOKMEADOW OFFICE PARK P iASE III MAY 20, 1988 PREPARED B NEW ENGLAND ENGINEERTNG SERVICES INC. 3 WALKFR ROAD, SUITE 23 -NOR 1` 1 A.I DO ER, MA 0184 TABLE OF CONTENTS PERMIT APPLICATION I ABUTTERS LTST COPY OFCHUCKS 4 PROJF'CT DESCRIPTION N STOR W TER DRAINAGE 5 RUNOFF VOLUME COMPUTATIONS TO 17 IGIGL 18 PARK-ING LOT LIGHTING 1 REFUSE ARIAS 1 ROADWAYS AND DRU ES/ TRAFFIC IMPACTS 1 LANDSCAPING 1 UTILITIES 20 FISCAL IMPACT 20 COMMUNITY INTACT 20 Please n—P eOrPrinCCle1rly. 1. Petitioner, Se� u�a T�r�a1t� Tvu Address:, 3 --Wnj:kf,,� FaQa�1. Telephone nwnber'. :3-140 2. Owners ofthe .P:rai d F" � �� �., ,,m._.. Ad'dreMs ; 33 alker Road Telephone number :1.4 t Number o�f years of�J�4"n�r"a�rm�a 3. L,o eation o C P roB:r rt3,:.-33 WaIker Road Zoning Dis,tricr A 'a P. 83, 1u0t # 4. Existing Lot: Lot Area (Sq ]E't_ ; �7,�� .5- Building eight: Street From ee Si ne Setbacks: q Front Setback: 4 0 Rear 'Setback,. i 6rr _ Floor ,Vea Mateo:: 19 1_ t Coverage: 9 5.. Proposed Lot: Building He'�oh t Street Frontage-. 184. 7 Side Setbacks: t 1 p L Required Lot (as required by Uning Byl.j%v)-, Lot " LS t. ;° 14ci2hr Street Frontage 1,25 ° Side Setbax-,ks: �, n Front Setback, 251 Rear Setback: 35,! Floor 2Vea Ratio, _ �� 1,..04 Co eraec ..�.�..- Emisti!rag Bididing, Ground `S Fro I _.:ewo Total sq. 8960 ". e Tyl.� Proposed Di:aidin,g: Ground Floor q. Ft.)3450 #of Mom Total Sq, Ft.: 6900 - -- -.Height: [use; of Tice ` ypY -,Of crIstr4.roti0a: wood f rame` 9. Petitioner a»d La0dow>ner sip ati:re(s): _ .._. Every application For Site Flan Rewiew shall he made on this form whi&is_t e official' form oftiie PlaaningBoard. l✓vei}' application shall be fed with the Town7berk,S Office, Tt sha€I be the responsibility ofthe7petitioncr to fn�sh an supporfingtiocafientation with — this application. The dated copy ofthis appkatiou received by the-Towfi Ckrk or- Planning Office does not absolve the appkant from i s res�ansibility: Tht peddGner shaft be responsible for a€I cxpeoses for f ling and legal notiffcation.:Failure to comply with applicatioa requirements, as cited herca and in-the Plam ng.B�oa ules-and ---' --' replatio may resWt in a dismissal by the-Planniug Roai& fth s>a iicati. as -- incomplete. - Petitioner's Signature: —- print or type name here: Owner's S i nature: - - Print or tie name here: List of 3 0-foot abuttei' [cj 33 WaIker Road, N. Andover Prepared By New EngIaud i ngineering Services, Inc. NIap# ParceI# Ownt-r Address 3 4-1a Sccrjrity Rcafty'frust P,O Box 398, - Andover MA 01845 83 4-2c&d G & W Realty Trust 33 WaIker Road unit 2e, N. Andover NIA 01845 83 4-2a b DML\4 Rpalty Trust 55 Moody Street, Andove.r MA 0 18 10 3 3 Mc Donalds Corp. P_0_ Box 360, Windha€n NET 0,3087-03 0 83 2 Veadowview Condo Assn. AT TN' Tnistees 5b Walker Road, N, Andover NIA 01845 83 1 N. Andover Assisted Uving 300 Brickstone Sq, ADS 5"' ]floor Urnited Andover MA01810 83 5 Brookside Homeowners 642 Chickcring koad, N. Ajidovcr MA 01845 83 5a G.A.R. Corporation 317 Middlesex St N_ Andover MA 0184 83 6 Town of N. Andover 120 Main Street, N. Andover MA 01845 83 7 Tyrone,C. Mo att 60 Fast Water Strect, N. Andover MA 01 845 83 8 Steven C. & Diane L. atses 3 5 Bridle Patti, N. Andover MA 01845 83 9 Juan Oscar& Leslie Azaret 334 dear Hill load, N. Andover MA 01845 9 31 Stalex R"Ity Trjxst 358 C hid !stnut Hill Avenue, Brookline NSA 0214 69 30 Deana& Monal Thonihil1 30 East Water Street, N_ Andcnvcr MA 01845 69 29 Richard `, &Taney C- 1 ohinsoji 24 Fast Water Strect, N. Andover NIA 01845 69 2.8 Phillip L. & Mary L. Pelletier 18 Cast WaLei- S lree1, Tea, Andover MA 01845 92 3 Town of North Andover Superintendents Office 75 Chickering Ito ad, N. Andover MA 01845 . 1 IelO JIV PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed proacct consists of cm,sti suction uI a 6184 ,gaarc foal wood frame office bualditag on all existili office building site- Fresen11y, two wo)cap€ ftanme. u111cc buildings exist earn the site. 'I'lie two existing buildings comain WriWIts SUCK as accowitants, builders, developers, and cc mputer sales offices, 'I ltc pmposcd building is PHA SE 11T of a project chat was previously approved by the Towel ofNordi Andover, 'flic site, leas been part i0ly con,,tracted and the parking areas and utility hookups as well as Lhc drainage system have previoasly beers installed. STORMWATER DRAINAGE The proposed site was prev]caasl Perrniited for floar office buildings, two of which we comtructed and are in rase now. During construction of builclings one aiad two the parltiing areas, drainage structures, and utilities were installed for bui Wings duee aald four. This proposal cosh, nmplates the construction of a single 6784 square lbot office bui 1 di ng in place of the previously proposed buildings three and four- flip proposed construction of the 6784 square foot building wilk result in only a small increase iri inipemieable surface on the site so the increase in the runoff`voliane for the site is negligible. The flow of water from the site is controlled by six existing catch basins whiuh conned through the c.Donalds restaurant Sand to the drainage in Rt. 1 5. The flog eventually ends up in. C:ochiche ick Brook. The existing drainage faciIities have 'lot been analyzed as part of thi,3 subini€t.al, however this system 11as functions. d rinrnially with no problems since it" iristallatio'l. Cal culatious for the total volume of 1-unoff are ineludtd on tie following pages. `file calculations show that the increase in Val volii-De for a 100 year storm are minimal, The increase Fs 863 cubic feet, `Phis amount of increase is negligible when Compared to #lac flow of 313 cubic feet per second in Cochichm iek lire ok at the point of crossing RL 125 RUNOFF VOLUME COMPUTATIONS PRE DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF: 2 YL AR STORM; 15,930 sq. ft. X 0,2.18 ft. of pvtecipitation — 3 47 8,0 5 cubic feet 10 Y EAR STORN4- 15, 30 sq. ft. X 0.3 11, of preciplad on = 477 9,00 cubic feet 100 YEAR STORM; 15,930 sq. R, X (1.508 ft. of p3'ccipifation 7234.8 cubic feet POST DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF: YEAR STORM. 15,930 sq. ft. X 0.2 35 ft of precipitation = 3743.55 cubic feet 10 Y A STORM: -0 Of 15,930 sq. I X 0.346 - of precipitation = 5511,78 cubic feet at � ti r, rvca 100 YEAR STORM: 15, 930 sq. ft. X 0.. 08 ft, of precipitation _ 8 097.7 5 cubic feet RUNOFF SUMMARY TABLE YF R 10 YEAIY 100 YEAR PRE DEVELOPMENT 3479.05 4779,00 7234.80 POSE` DEVELOPMENT T 3743.55 551 L78 8097.74 RUNOFF INCREASE 265.50 732,78 862.94 W0d2Heet 2. Runoff curve number and runoff Project o o R 7 A D Q a r r A- K 13Y B-c-0. w,�z Date E . 7 catign Q R L K E 9 J�, A&_5»A n&& chacked I)a Le 20 A - Circle 0De: eiiii=D low d I . Runoff Curve aumber ( ) t7condition; !/ hydrologic! Cover descrlprion Area pt C X (cover type, rxea�rnn% w F hydrlogic conditi ; ƒ oac s pk?rceat lmpelvi_s; _ ~ ~ mil unconnected/connected impervious. / \ tz2 (appendix A) area ratio) m R � . � e P- P O97 pRQED9QR �& Lei f 9 ARC 963¥ ( . �.. e Only one CN 6ource per line. Lals - CN (weighted) _ total 2roduct \ \¥y £§ gal area a - . f 0.7± Use CN _ / Z93o ; Z. Runoff Storm #! storm ■! Storm «3 Frequency . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. Y: zo O /0 2 R in£ail, P (2 ur) .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ in 6r. 4V,/ 33 RunoE£, q . . . . . .. .. * 6 . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . . . ' . .. in (Use P d with t-bl | . fig. 2-!, or aqs. 3 and 2 ,) R -I- 55, Second Ed., June Dom) W0r hey Runoff curve, numb-er and runoff Project 2«oo k I\A£AD o%Aj O r;n-e.£e r , %.o �T& Date cation --!33 VU IN Q 3 C R �� _ Checked Rc T Date ecl, one: . Present ! . ,o£f e p ve _ er ( ) Fydro r de.criptian !/ Area Product and _ CN — of fc (c_er type, Eleat nt, d w . a�a hydrologic condition; \ \ / O scr/ percent !m@_ i u.; « ~ ~ q m12 u onne(!ted/cones c Led impervlous 2 \ G q 2 {apt,4iz A) area ratio) / -H VQOO D 6 0LZ RC- &—J r moo g9 / 7/ ZISR uj Dk»& ~ p U2O RAE � � e ly o■ . e r 11 . t!e �a 9 5 g 2 / 36 --Lttotal £ L 9 a® ON (weighted) _ - r , 5-23 - J.§3 e CM _ G total area tt 9/O ' . 22 Runoff stogy !t Storm #2 Storm #3 rr y . . . . . . . . . . .� . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . yr / o /e 2 Rainfall, r Q ur) . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . in Runoff, q . . . . . . . . � .. . . in 05a and CN with table 2-1 . fig. !, or eqa. 2- and 2-4.) � (2I0-VIlR-\ Secand Ed-, Alne 1986) PRE- DIVELOPMENT Foveb &.*T (D RE4LTY TRUST r � ' L 73F394,)QRE ti PROPANE -:ANK 5 ' '{ � 41 �'_' it � Eli dl�'I II d l ye }/ PRC)P SED pl II I 6784 sq. fit. s# I + I t f LLJ dxG < f f I f r'7 Er till ; SC � f I j f o I II BUILDING 2 � � t l , � 4,480 SQ. FT. I F b, 1 I f I � � # kPEFZ XZ-nNO RFFUS I I AREA T4 R AI) PARKING f05' 9*0;'41"'45 'tt EWER LINE f J tti I JFF MA/T 'J F r Y'E'W REAITY TRUST 0 PEW 5 PF% c,8 +L@ +Q+W no 1 1 slit ti � � 1 4 I 4 PROPANE TANK p ED I d 6 I i L� $fir ! .t �# 0 1 I OF Q I t7 LL ys tiC.wi i'i 1 I53 f I I 1 ; I ! w BUILDING 4,480 Q. = � � C4A,N 11 F'T. = ii FEN E I 1 I 2- COPPER I J I II y/AlEf ,lTlp{ � _ Em5T1a1G R;r'U V f I AREA TO REMAI PARKING I 2r. x=awn=��a-•— .._-- �—�— --- ��15y �I �} � I YS33x10 5 05' 'G I' r7 \k�FLS4�R LING i PT I __ ....................... .......................... .... x 1 PROP , 'Fable 2-2o,-10rkoff curve nt,inbCm for urban arcnsL CLWVL numbers Kok' cover description I>.yc[rotctkic- noik grottp_ Average permit {sower type LtLld hyclrolagic condition impervious areal A 13 D Fully developed urban areas (wYeta.tton estcabli8 aec 70pen', e (lawns, laarks, golf Carursrs, cerneteri25,ond tiotk (gr:+ss cover < 5 [a) . . ... . . . . .. . . 68 79 SSG,Eidition (gk ass cover 50%. to 7:%).. . . . . .. . , . 4.9 89 69 79 84ondition (grass covr.L' 759'0) . , .. , .. . , -- 3 Ei 1 74 8i] Impervious arras: Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc, exelutiin r 1'E Fht i 98 98 98 98 ree s and roa s_ Paved; curbs and storm sewers (excluding rigbWf-%VaY)-- - - - -- ... . .. . . . . .. .. . ... . . ... . .. 8 98 98 98 Paved; opera ditelies (ittcludirEg right-of-way) . .. .. ., 8. 89 92 98 Caravel (including right-of-way) . . ., ., . ,, , .. 76 85 89 91 Dirt(including right-of-way) . .. . . . .. ... . .. . .. .. .. 72 82 87 89 Wes ern dcscrt urban areas; Natural desert landscaping (perv-taus areas OnlyY.- 63 77 85 B8 A.rdTcial desert landscaping (hnpervious weE!d Farrier, desert shrub with I. La 2-inch sand or gravel knulch and basin borders). ... .. 96 96 96 Urban districts; Commercial and business. . .. . .. .. .. ... . .. .. .. . .. . 85 89 92 94 % IYAIIStrial, .. . .. .. .. .. .. . ... . , . , .. .. . . . . . . 7' 81 88 91 T3 Residential districts by avemge tnt size: 118 aCi-C 61' Jess (LD;. n hawses), , , , , , ,, ,, , ,, ,, 65 77 85 90 92 114 acre , ,,, , ,, ,, , , , , , , 38 61 75 89 87 113 acre . . .. . . . .. .. . .. . . .. . 30 57 72 8E 86 112 acre . .... .. . .. . .. .... . .. . .. . . .. ... .. .. . .. .. 2.5 54 70 s0 85 1 ackr , .. , .. , .. .. .. .. . . . . . . - -- -- --- -- 20 51 68 79 94 2 acres ., ..,, ,, .. . . . .. . ... .. . .. .. .. 12 46 65 77 82 Devulopi zg areas Newly graded areas (perviatas noTas Only, no vegetati0n)5 ... .. .. .. ... . . . . . . . . .. ... . . .. .. . . . 77 86 9f 9 Idle lands { N's are determined using cover types similar to those in table 2:W, 'Average runoff condition, and E. 0.2S. 'The aver age pekrent impea3-ious oirLrs shown wkLX u:cd to develop the cornpasite CN's-CCllt1`;y,;Z;j1 Lfytiuro:air as fU]IU 'q; itt5PerViEPULi a MILS qre dia-eclly vmnec[eaE Lip Like dmimkge 8y:;tekr-L, imperviouk kuvwi have a CN of 98, and 13-erti'irmtS artixK are C4hS 11Lved'egI Ideklt to qKn space in goad hydrulog-ic condition- CWH E'ae other uninhinatlons of tondkions may be rorn[lutf-A w3hig figure 2;i Gr 2-4- IC:N'z�sttowTt are equivalent to ffiwt.e of pasture. Composite CN's my be compa4ed for other combinatians or uiwn bpace Diver type. 4(:UTnEMSjW CNLs for nutu al d seit landscaping Awitd Ere cwnpuwd uning Figures 2,3 or 2-4 bav_-d On the imp(tMO a urea pekeentage (CN = M and the pervious ;kre�L CN-The pck'v1Ut.L2 area C:N-t are jt%%unted equivalent to dRsert Amb in Exxar hydrologic condition, x{,aaMpgsiie CN's W uo;r for the Aestgn o£ Lemporary mextvarvs dwing, grading and canotructiotk t;houtd be computed using 5gu'Le 2-3 uo-2-4, based on the degree ur development{imPefvionK urea percentage)and the CN's for the tlew[y gru&d pw-rvious at ems- ( fi-' Y-` R-d5, Second Ed., ,curie IM6) 215 ;COUNTY, MASSACHUSE€TS, NORTHERN PART 193 f� TlBLK AND WATER FEATLFI[Ei--Coatinuei] --�- " �� ask o� c orrCY lore FLoading Eiigka Hnter�c 1 -_. .. -_ r-.... ...--T -... , ._�--------- 3amc and ;Hydro-. r 3'Ukentia11 � ymhol t IGgic; Frcyuency Duration ;Hrurtb13 DepUl K1nd e2{onIk is f'rosL ;E1nCoal.fiL, iC0n4,r-c[c aou aCtinn steel I 0 fEEanc-- ----i --- i ;O.U- ,S:Perched i5ifp-JtYrl 11i91)-----IHiPlt-- --iai101- Ell s i 301 { R WnC, IF ' ; , -� I , I h fMon e----- . ,� --- i }6,U � --- i --- Euw------iLou--- "- illf�h, ]r Y { ! s r I L 1 i 1 i !L PHsanc_ Y.�r� --- i �ur i }�7�{1 i --- i ii.0,,i------iLou---- ilE1g}! 11 1 1 i I 1 I 1 yi.cYop. i 1 1 i 1 ,1 I -----------i ;Orrr.a5innn] iBricf- - Sip-April ,O-j,E];Apparcrit lle`-Apr ;High--- -;Ni0�5er'atP ;Mnder3te, r; { ki y j R, Wrc. 1 I I I I SC. W5 il}Y :Gm--------i C iNQnde------- --- i "'- ; 1 ,5-j (J Peercnea �Hov-F145r Elfgh----- ModeraLe ;Modcf-il L! 3 r r � 7 i re ,ie�.cription. of tkle asap unjL for cocnpo5iZ.i m and "[kavior charackcrisl lr.s of the map unit 3a 3d 1 S� x1 i 1. 3 N an 5 !R tm na !,n 4' 1 ,{n kl i., r 1c � jI in Ir r -N II k k w. k I C.-,SCX COUNTY, MA%SA(,HUSHf ; _3[4Lf49 r Yk P, E,orl C. Pao Y WEB, F 110A UZO WI) UD k TF -_X fi 7 40� P.B Pan;r FM 3 J VIA� wh 14P D 'kyrr~i ljbLi Arr � 3 FiNK W r.R a MF Pas r_0 Lj D Cn. rya'* ilJ R�tA. ' 1S,"5!�,'4�'.M1 f�r�- � ;ryf:-' '� �� -'}it P L1 .'.� -� '�s �' ���;9 pa-c'I it W fi-A CA N 13L iei Wr.� fF -W I -IF .5 p.L 1 . Ril i■i ■i�i■m■iIi■i i■■■i■!■ i■ ■■ i ■ ■ 1 ■NOME 0MEN ■ I�■/ ■fir■■ � � ME mm FAWN MIII■AII�IfIliAl■ I1 '�I■i1� .11i N■.#�i��� '�1�■■��■i■ i ■� I � i� �i PsON ME pop- i i ME m gap mop OR on no ON !r i � �s ROM on SON■MEMNON ME No M ��■�■� � ■i��■ t f i ( E£geee 2 precipitation value£ for xasaaeE22Etts E " m_LLN z 3.2 m_U2X �ma a_� ass . ` 3.8 RAINFALL DATA MAP ` ITAa � 2-YF-A R 24 How FRS IP ITATT oN CINCHES) � ©kTUCKET Eqn m,_m ._q 5_o�x . f WORCESTER 4 0 --� . ■ 4.4" ¥ RAINFALL DATA M AP ■ aT 4, EAR 24-N0 USt PRECRTLA TM k D*CHEF �■n��, / T-4 (210-2FM. Pr.end . Mal , zmril 1990) t1A 2-22 1) ] 5 �?, '9 ZiRsE@ 2 - �reei9itation 2a1Ge5 £or [�ssaE§2Sett5 � 4.2" 4. 3 4.4` 4 5 ~ � . EqR x 4.6 �® waR - ����• , �C w 4 7" ._.CPE- 11 ki % 4-8 RAINFALL DATA ¥A@ 4 jo_¥EAR, 24 HouR PREc 1mTAq oN O NCHEg mvl!� � .ANmaET { 5.3 1 , S.C� S.S E. � 5,41 t £q� A_LAH 5.5" IdI DOLE R sJ;70a % «.tom T GFL - 5.§ ` A \ l §.7' alums RAINFALL DATA MAP 5. 25 - YES.24 -HOUR RrjF Qm 7 DON (INCHES) Du � NA.m - �� |a 2-22 {2) |2I0-57R, k � �.6 .,'iavre- 2 Precinitation Values for {assachiisetts � gay .6E1 711 ~~ tylk CSUX 7 FRANKUN - 6, 0 It Ik�ans xx 5LFF(KK WOACESTEX xi,�liPaNJR[ RAINFALL DATA NEAP � & NNSTA 6. 41 $0-•YEAR. 2 4 HOUR PR£CIPITAT1 ON (INCK ESf Dux PI A NTUCS[7 TP--40 31[i Fl1,�114 6,6� x 4R�fST'!R #0,, "A w►m% rid` 7� RAi ALL DATA MAP � E00 YEAR ( E�'ICHES N R to C PWT r TP-40 j '? .2. �8 SICT AGE: Presently a single sign exists at the entrance to tie prol)e!TLy On Walkcr load which identifies tlrc complex as Brookmeadow [: ffioc Park. Below the main sign there are spaces for six individtial tenant signs, foie-of wh1di are in use. Ot mer te�Iaut Dave small signs a€=hed to the wall of ffic buiIding at the appropriate enitrauce for their office, None of the signs ire lighted. No additiomil stgnage is proposed at tilt cutrmice to tht� complex. Expansion of the complex will probably initiate the use of tho refraining two tenant signs on the Ina i11 complex sign. Other tenants wi€I have sign6 r. punted on the exterior of'the buiI din g at the apprapriale entrances. PARKING LOST LIGHTING The existing [�uildings are lighted by individual wall mounted fixtures at each.of the building entrances, to addition, there are two wall counted flood lights that slulrc over two of the parking areas. The first is on the from of Building 1 and is aimed towards the lot adjacent to Walker Road. llic second is on the rear ofBuilding 2 and is aimed to the rear of'tile site. The proposer) new Building 3 would be lighted only by wall mounted fixtures at the entrances. T€ic present wall mounted flood Iigbts will provide enough parking lot Iight for the proposed building. REFUSE AREAS Refuse is preseMy handled by a private, trash h haler using a dumps#cr that is looted in a fct.ced enclosure on the Northeast side of.'the site. The enclosure will be used if its present Iocation to cont 6n the dumpsfer after-construction of the new building. 19 ROADWAYS AND DRIVEWAYS/ TRAFFIC IMPACT Brookmeadow 0fl ice Sark is presently serviced by two cxistilig driveways that access on to Walker Road. Walker Road is a 26 fboL wide private, way maintained by the users of the way. Walker Road also serves as the to l oDanalds Rcstaurant and intersects Route 12 at a�ignali'rcd intersection, TiaFric presently enters into the comp Icx through the Noilherly driveway oii Walker road- Traffic 11ow is one way in a clockwime direction around the buildings and exits Onto Walker Road Wirlg the Southerly c11-ive Way- The existing traffic pattern on the site is to remain the sane kinder the new proposal. Traffic impacts on Walker Road w-1II he negligible, The present. pavement width of Walker Roam and inlerscction capacity at R(1ute 125 arc sufficient to Service,the small increase in traffic that will occur from the constructkor) cif the.proposed building LANDSCAPING Brookmeadow Office Park 3 s presently landscaped with a naix cif d"iduoas shrubs, fhododendims, azaleas, and decidtious trees. Landscape treatments adjacent to the new building are proposed to be of a similar mix of trees and shrubs. Varieties that will require Iess trimming than (Dose that exist at the site now will be used, Along the north and cast boarden� of'the site there arc residential properties consisting of multi unit faun story buildings on one propeily, and an assisted Iiving propcfty on thc- olher. prescfitl there exists a buffer of shrubs and sapling trees Belong lbese boarders that shield the residential properties from the activities of the, office complex. This buffo will not be disturbed,and additional trees will be planter)`along the edge of the parking areas to supplement the existing growth. The pi-operly to the South of'the complcx is home to ivlcBonalds restaurant. `lac propertie are,separated by a six foot high stockade fen c in addition to plantings on the McDonalds side of the fence. No new landscape treatments are propost d along this boarder with the exception of two trees that will be planted in two new islands that will be cut into the existing pavellicnt. Landseapc treatments will also be used to shield the fencing uround the dumpster anefi and to shield a proposed above ground propane tank. 0 J31-oo 1eaclow Officc park is serviced by municipal and water- Tlic services exist oll tho slte in Ilse locations shown oil the plan- Flectric service also exists 011 the site. The electric service is a f)uried service. FISCAL IMPACTS The proposed 679 squw-e foot office building will have a positive fiscal im paot for North Andover. Studies clone in towns with similar characteristics to I ortb Anduver leave slic)w i that a coinjiueicial development wiII raise Mor-, tax dollars trait they wiII require I()'- tiie service's t1lat the use, Thi8 is IOgicaI since a dcveIopfncrit of this type will rm produce, airy school children (the school budget is abnut 501 a c)f the Eotal budget} and will not require ar.y rubbish service or higliwa The project will i uire n,unicipal sewer and water, however these services are ccxvercd by hillin g for use. The only service requhed by the project will be police, fire, alld general govertmYerit. COMMUNITY IMPACT This proiect will not have a negative effeoi upen thte coinmunity of North Andover. The buiId1ng proposed is part of an existing coinpiex of office bl,i€clings. The user of the exIsiing buildings and of the proposed buiIding arc mfdnfy Office type uses that do Wsincss during the normal business hour;;, The Office use does not produce any excess noise, obnoxious fianes or odors, or dangerous environments with a potent;a€ of iiIjuring ad-iacent residents. The site does serve as a bufrier between the residctriia1116ghborhoods and the Mc Donal ds fStaurant, provicljiig a ViSq�al shield between the f-esidential area and the restalurant parking arca,,�, w ritilation systems, and rubbish disposal #€icilities. The proposed architecture is of a colonial design and niatches tlic arclii tee ti�re of the existing buildfi s. The architecture fs appropriate for' the local area and the towD as a Whole. The site is not near any vahiab€e natural resource, historic structure, or other sensii3ve area of tOW11,