The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1999-06-28 Engineer Review SPR i C LANT NI Z E-NGkMiUMS AND SCsENT35TS Phinning Board Clo Walh,am Scott Town Hall Annex 27 Charles Street forth Andover, IMA 01845 Engineering review 13akc,-n-J*y JFoc�ds Site Man Dtar Mr. Scott- In response to your request, Coler & Colantonio, Inc, has €eviewed tine subr-littal package for the above refcmnc d site. 0 uic tffotls included a comparison of information submitted with respect to the requirenieuts of the Forth. Andover Zoning Bylaws. The submittal package includcd the fallowing information, Plans 1 witted • "Plan of Land in North Andover, NW, located in. forth Andover, ]Mass.,, consisting of four sheets dated 4130/99, Prepared by Thomas E, Neve Assoc. Recr-ived May 6, 1 3, * "Site Pian Application, gubmitral letter and Hydrology )deport„ dated April 19, 1999, Prepared by Thomas E- Neve Assoc, Received May 6, 1999, W B - 1. Section 4.137)Hood Plain District-The FIRM Maps, indicate the flood plains in the vioinity Of the west property line. The flood plain, if within the)imit of work, should be indicated on the plans and the Base F]wd Eh-oration should he labeled. If any part of the site is inciu[lcd in tic Flood Plain, then the projecr should comlDiy with the regulations of this wticn. 2. Section 6.1.) It is unc1car if any new signs have been proposed. 101 Acrord Park Drive 781-982-5400 Nowell, MA02G61-168!i Pax; 781-982-5490 3. Section 8.1) A waiver is being requested lion'constructing the additional 15 parking sPuces at the west side of the site, until such use necessitates, 4. Secbori 8,3) 5.) C.)i.)The location map is not to scale, however we can identify the Sim, 5. Section 8.3) 5 a-) vh ) Subject to ttre construction of the additional parking area on the westerlY side of thP, site, ibex. should be a proposed me, hod to capture the additional drainage, The calcuIa€ions indicate a 1.5 cfs increase jn post construction runoff pcdk flows. Reportedly, the existing pond, when Constructed in 1994, was designed to decrease runoff by approx. l.5 cfs and it is suggested that this condition should compensate- The site oltarmately discharges to the pond can the opposite side of the Willow SzFeet Extension, which repowdly bns adequate storage Eo handle this increase. The.planning Board shakrld view this issue. We,were not itrvolved ire the pmvious st)bmittal. In previous subrnittais for this area it #gas bocn aswmcd that !N'. existing street drainage is acceptable there#'vrr, we have tjot conunented on this issue, A detail of tor proposed rip-rap swaie should be provided. 6. Section S.3) 5.)e.) xi) A Notice of Intent,Application should be filed in conjkinction with this application. 7, Section 8-3) 5,)e,)xiv,)Areas dedicated to proposed outdoor retail sboeld be mole ckaarly delineated on the plans. 8. Section 83) 5,) 0 xv.) It is not clear if arty trees, 12" diameter or greater, are proposed to be removed- 9- Section 8-3) 5.)e,) xix.) A traffic study may be mquested by the Planning Board, IO. Section 8.3) 5-)a-)xxii,) A fiscal impact study may be requested by the Planning Board. 11. Sectiou 8-3) 5,) e.}xtx,) A community impact study may be requested by the planning Boar. 12. Section 8.4.) 4_) The existing parking faciIiry does not comply with the landscaping rcquirements.The Planning Hoard should be aware of this condition. it is t,ot clear that the landscape buffer along the Willow Street Extension will be mairttai d, 13. Section .) please sre eor menI# 12. We appreciate the oppostun"Y to assist (1't P121nnin Board on this pcvjeet and hope tha€ this info atiop is sufficient for yajjr needs. If you have any quCsuons please do not 11"Itate to contact ris. Very try you, COLER & COLANTONJO, INN. lohn�C, lIC!'Aa,RE -lbomas E. Nevc Assmi ales ]im Rand, DPW C OLAN C +Gfv CA$ AND SC;Era,rSTS Jurre 1 E, 1999 Heidi Griffh3 Town Planner Town H91 Annex 27 Charles Street North Andover, MA 01$4.5 RE: Supplemental Enginee6ng l cview Hake-n-Joy Foods site Plan Dear Ms. Griffin: 1n responw to your request, vler & Cal antonio, Inc_ has reviewed t}xe submittal package for the above referenced sire. Our efforts included a comparison of information submitted itlti respect to the mquimmenw of the North Andover Zoning Bylaws_ The submittal package included the following inforniation' Plans Entitled ! "Plan of Land in forth Andover, MA", locatcd in North Andover. Mass." consisting of fiaur sheets dated 415O199, Revised June 1, 1999. epared by Thomas E_ Neve Assoc, Received Acne 9, 1999, + "Letter or Response`° dated June 8, 1999, P.cepared by Thomas E. Neve Assoc, R"egved June 9, 1999, ZoRinv bilaw. 1. Suction 4.137)Flood Plain District-The FMM Maps indi4;�ate th.e flood plain in tht! vicinity of'the west property line.The flood plain, if within the limit of work, should be indicated on the plans and the Base Flood Elevation sltoulr}be labeled. If any part of the site is included in the Flood Plain, ihen the,project should comply with the regulations of this section. .Reportedly the I00-year Flood Plain has freers audied and mapped by H.W, Moo€rr and i+MftM by Nevi Assoc afes, which indicates the lim r b,}yond the prope,rty late. asisfactorily addressed. 101 Accord Pack Drive �701-982.5400 Norwell, MA 02061-1685 Pax. 781-982-5490 2. Section 6.1) It is unclear if zany new signs have been proposed- Reporreddy, new signage (5 a,at proposed- Sat;sfactarily addressed , section 8,1) A w civet is being iequested from constructirxg the addidona[ 16 parking spaces at the wrest side of the We, until such use necessitates. Reportedly, this waiver has been granted. Satisfactorily addressed- 4. Section 8.3) ) ) i ) The location map is not to scale, hr}wever we can identify the Site- o further comment. 5. Section 83 5,)e.) vii.) Subject 10 the cotrstniction of the additional gaTking arfa on the westerly side of the site,there should be a proposed method to captuxia€ltc additiorjal drainage, The calculatiM indicate a 1.5 ds increase in p=constnxct'ton rixnaff peak flows. Reportedly, the existing pond,when constructed in 1994, was dcs!gned to decrease mnoff by approx. 1,5 cfs and it is suggested boat this condition should comperisate- The sire ulfim:ately discharges to the pond an the Gpposite side of the Wiftw Street Extension, which repotedly has adequate storage to handle this increase.The planning Board shoLild review this issue. We weTe not involved in ft previous aubrnittal. in previ"s riubmit als for thir, area it has been assumed that the existing street &airkape is acceptable xherefore we have not commented on this issue. A detail of the pmposed rip-rap 5w alo should be pmvide i. A. derail of the proposed rip-rap swede has been included, however Me sWaIe diniensions were not included. It is nor dear that swan 1wil colleci and channel u11 runoff improper consiructton could result in overflow iriro the parking urea. The Planning ward should be aware of thhv fssr+e. 6. Section 8.3) 5,) e_ xi.) A Notice of Intent application should be filed is conjunction with this application, Reportedly, a Notice of in tent ryas fled on AM 15- 1999, NO f unher comment, 7. SWi1D.n 8. ) 5,)e.)xiv.) Areas dedicated to proposed outdoor Mai i should be rnaFc clearly deline-ated an the plans, o outdoor retail is proposed. Safisfacioridy addressed. 8 Section l 3 5-}e,) xv_) It is not clear if any [ es, 1 T„diarnetex or greater. am proposed to be MmOved. Reportedly, -12 Maple Trees may be removed. Tate Planning Board should address 1ids issue. 9. Section 8_3) 5,) e. xix_) A traffic study may be requested by the Planning Board, &,porredly, a traffic study is not required. N,9 further commant, 10. Section 8.3) 5.)e) xxii ) A fiscal impact study may lie requested by the Planning Board. Reportedly, a fiscal impact study is not required. No fiirfher comment, 11, Section 8, ) 5.) e)xix.) A community irzrpact study tray be mquested by the Plannin8 $Qarrl, Reportedly, a cor�munfty impact study is riot required. No furthereo�nrr:cnt. 12, Section 8.4_)4. Tne existing Puking facility does not comely with rbe landscaping requirements. The Planning Board should aware of this condition, It is not cleat that the landscape buffer along Thr,Willow Street Extension will be tmaintaiinw. The Planning Board should address this issme_ No further comment. 13, Section, 9. Please see comment# 12. See comment#11 We appreciate the opportunity to assist the Planning Board on this project and bepe that this information is sufficient for your needs_ If you have any questitms please do not hesitate to contact us. Very t ly yours, COLER&COLANTONIO, INC, 4 hn C. he-mid, P.E. C' '1 orr as E. Neve Agsaciates Jixn' and. DPW �OLE LANMN10 �w3rEERs FACSIMILE COYER SHCET To: Heidi Griffin Company: planning Board phane: 978- 8-9 0 Fax: 978-688-9542 From: Jason Loiselle company: Coler & ulant io' Inc. Phone: 781-992-5400 Fax; 781-98 -5490 Date: Junell, 1999 Pages including this cover page: 4 Please find tbae final attacheA Site Plan Re'+xew for BAIL -n-Toy. XC: Jim Rand 979-689- 573 Thomas Ncwe s!ociates 8-B$7.348Q 25'Wde , 1:2' \ f 1ƒ / / � .. \ 3 b£an@mne e Iyp ltvck wk#h r Wwd&stabR»ee Ug#poh5p -W �khae CASiV �t aller machines aveflame No Miurbance Zone7 . . in § § Freezer n guardrail 00 U � � ay was OV � . - �vel■ub�d -- |■ � fie# E»rrk@ 0 Sewer line wafer line Dimgd0on . existing _ 2- § R 7 Wd remove pa VhI9 or ��mJ Driveway Excavation Study Scab 7 Guard Post Detad Not -ro scale ,EWnNOGRAS$9LOFE lzzzlt-' kU SM F.Aw • # - b Ju • i O # LEd oo OFt9THp11OTT F�p�i'�Il � } iGP F3 COYRic1ED +XJ.'-"` =��,�. FI401'Ork"�$VfA.€ �f PkY�h1G E OF SIQPE • � � AYE. CL-=255.5" Norm o v 3. F]�7T1+0 T4f OF or w &Lan 10 M �w "am EXISTOC OPM on L 'r-d' MEAM, Fir -Rap Slope Detail � . I To scafo JUN-17--1 39 15;51 THWAS E. NEt)E AS WC. P,02 A. � � % NTEVE `c lelvLL ASS P 9ING uftT"'14 A 2 1 1999 Ms. Heidi r . �rx, Town Planner VG� �� Fri 27 Charles Street ��7 North Andover,NU 01845 Re- Muffin Realty Tru"Wce-n-Joy.Food. 352 Willow Street, Site Plan Review Dear Heidi` please accept thew minor additions which I have added to the plans. I will follow up with flu size drawings by mail. 1. Driveway Excavation SWy. `iris sketch has been added for the Conservation Comrmi'sion. It shows the existing underground utilities which dictate the locat Dn Qf the proposed water fine. It should satisfy t#re owner and the Commission that the work can he done with the drivoway open and without any adverse effect on adjacent wetlands. 2. Rip-Rap Slope Detail. C&C has questioned the size of thie gran& &wale that runs along the west side of the proposed addition access effiveway (Supplemental Engin=rang Rvveiw June 11, 99 item . The s ale grows from approximately 2 FT wide at the driveway comer to approximately 4 FT wide at the. drop inlet catch basil, It is proposed to be 4 inches deep, We See no value iu performing calculations to justify the size for the following reasons; 1- it drams only the paved surface sad is gently sloped. . It is not proposed to satisfy storrnwater management rNuirenients. It was.introduced ino the dedgnsolaly io prevent storm nnoff from routintly mssing the pwpuscd leading dock area which can become a nuisance in certain seasons. Should an extmme 5tQTm ovent exceed its capabilities any water not entering the drop inlet CD would simply land its way to CB 03 aver the paved surface as would have hem the case without tho proposed&trttmwre, incmlyr THOV i.. COATE ,INC. Jim Bourgeois,Project Coo�nator JBJjp cc; Jason Loisefte,C&C Itobuk Qgan&Paul DePe ,Bake,.n-Joy Michel to Martin,NACC3 7onarp.d4c ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYOAS * LAND USE PLANNERS 447 Old Boston Road 41 Topsfiald, MA 01953 (97B}837-8586 FAX(978)087-3480