HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-12-04 Engineer Review SPR {
TOWN OF NOWrT-1 AN DOV ER jq,ANN ING BOA14D
YNG7NFERYNfa lV1FV4' OF� 1T ��TOWN PLAN ANT) AOF NORTH A€VT�iIVT� ii1T
FAR Cpl DTth+fA['�
7DNI�`lC, BYLAW AND STAND< LPD ENO r�TtTNG PRACTICE
E
Site Plan'1'stle:
Little Professionals VfiB Flo.:'06716.79
c�tatiu>3: 7 Laconia Circle
( cattier. Arlthnrly Ps�ciita&5tephame Deangelis,2324'!'rlrn ike St, loriiti Andrrver, MA lB$5
A O18 45
Applicant: T,ett4 yr�,Fessionals inc..7 Lac onin Ci>c1c,NUYth Andovct,
t':c E�+ i» er: HIa Dcs�gre Co�xskiitants, 4nc., l43 Stiles Ttd S�tte Clnc, Salerot,l`lFi{13079
Applicap 9
1'lasr I2akc:
JL11y 3 E,2W3 R(,viejv!)ate: A.uttist 19,2i 0
werpansn Bylaw, assachw;ensDepartinent
. asse Hawn�3rustli�l, Inc- (VI IFS)is providing an en g°n North Andokew of t3te�Site C'lafl for r�itile Prnfessirrp��35.
Van racEoce. V" iras
'f�ris reviews coptd�tctcd in aCctsl-danec witlk the'i'own of
of L=.�1ViYniUllenP$� PFQkecdorl(OLip) temrnYwat r ts.�i1 ag review;
PUl1CY 41n{� StFi1��2ii{�Ci1�"lrtee�l[�}�T
received the 10110wing drawings and docamcit
Site plan,(10 sheets)dated July 11.200
■ DraulageCRIGUIations
Traffic St,ndy prepared by Dermot),Kelly ssociakes,Inc,clated April 2{}03•
71V-i`oliuwiotg COmoMenxs n0tc poor-cunforma tier,with s}eeific section,ctaxstruct i3llrty 15+�7 331
citicsEicar,slconumnis on tYoe prnposcd desi n-
NORTH ANI)oVER ZONING'BYLAI S
Section A:Rulldirng%nd i;scs PerrmiEted
rmit w operate a dayc,3rc facility within industrial L T}isirit#
"€'k)e Aglica��t lra�>:ec�+xested a specixtl ix:
P
Section 5:Earth Materials Rel"DY21
Please verify tha alt rr qulremenis Move Ixecot the l a1 tt1 Renlovrxl w
Section?: 1)iml-mierpal Requiremenis
7,1 Lc. Area
Tlxe existing kni gees not rner~t the mil3imurn lot�r�c su e�rtent.rable 2 of iitie North Andover 7.or�ing Bylaws. The
Applicant is regliesking a speuiai hermit rc1117 t11tl
7 3 ': etb�ciC
. .�lOc propuseri lwtli3ding d s#cd
oes not meet tixe lniniEtty�M�Gc:for the setback ey�ircet3cnl.�ble 2 of thei`+lortkr Andover
.s1>ningBylaws, `IhcApPIicunthasrcgllca
i
7':16y7 t677kd«9lmEwA1s1,05717A-Ottle Ptafe£uiaraSsdnC
Setfion 8: S{ipplenrentary kc ulrx#iorls
Scz! nn&3 Sire f'f��yjc,v
-3-5 1`I��oratLatian�c�e�
Cenel'ai- `f'he parltisra px]Ins flare !ao#6eela signc€i air stl}Cd by ccr#ili Applicant is is reyaaestirlg waiver froala this rPrilaire3rren#, theljo,
f}is�rusap System,and Ehe Ligfriillp; �'taa] &Deiaifs}rave rsut bee 1stlrnped dlsigls dpaat' Sewage
c vti} Storrt3w,3lcr Drainage: 'f'fris s..,ina requires#fiat the r�pplicalnt show tftc Mitigation ofSttIrlr!water
rauoffto zero Tor#d 2,tile
Io poe d storms. The applicant fray sflo;vn that Efic peak ratty of rur)off
leave faeelr Iraitigated by tlrc prtrpose[i a;i[rritotvat4rsySteM. HOweva3r, #hc 1a)tal qualo#ity of runoff
from the site has not i3eorr nit iga[ed and Sho%yg an increase ill the vofunl4 nfrulleff from tfie site,
Vie$ PUc hn Vr n on
I r;�kpp7licattt eonsir3at the fc�.sihility of a recharge sys#aaxr ork sate- Mhoklgh the
Snag ly a S�aou7t OR tfk SAS jrlapS i5 li_q, ftS iyfre .ilea f}EFCOT{rtl03l fQCe of 5 IaklCiuC i7eI Inch
[axdic�#es fi}art it is poassibfe#rs loe;i#e aY recharge systcrri oat site.Sec t<;a?.atcraf DrainageCotatiraealis-
e xv) Landscaping i'paal:Tho FIlateriak and i12C tfle Pri313(}S£{! fgR 9r6d i7pufrler f]aara tars have F1{rX
provided. A sfkrufa is l:tbelecE xs'iD can ilea lapail and as i H in the pplknting s+he+3ule 7'herc vrert
discrepancies noted in flit rtuniber of shnabs brr tine pfam and irk [fee 1>faaltin sciledtt lo. TheAPPlie[knt`s EVineer sholaiai review and adjust accorrlingly-
e-xviiit Drrtinjge Rasktr Study;'i9his sec lion requiccs tfre'xpprlicatkEp�roviderk drainage basin scud f
site, Pa"of this study inciurpes tlac evaitiaikon of downstreat3l iu� Y or Ehe
sys#aFrl, 1'fts pplic:lnt does not pTaviri disekassion or analysis o fhe dnwnf ire rn c[snt#ilio egutilcr
ih a [hen rftc G f goose tt3 wetpat3[i reSi�Ilrc a BreAs- Vfll3 t tOmrllcnCis tfre cler;i8rr eugincer discuss
wlacre the ava7aff gees after]caving tilu property.Also sic(sea7craI Drainage CotrrrriCaaEs.
c-xixj Traffic JuapQer Study_ k--Traffic Study C:nrnmtml_s,
a-xxt} Utilities; See Csene-raj and Drain,I a C€situnenls,
3-6 R evic. w Critc,•rilk i csgn C�uidt s
3-u-r.) s see#ion a•equires that EEae ap�piic�tnt show tfkc a y s deraas withinreCril)tioll of the dalrlairr� abifify oftfre f]rnposeri setva9cdispos,�Il attci water
prrovide a ovi and adc aeerrt to rlle si to to serve the prop�oscd lease. The applicant rslmtrfd
for water use aalti []rc exptle(l sewage generation rate with ar
daanpalisn9l Err the ticsign parameters of[fie proprased systcnas. 'f'he�ppiic;Ia�t slrotlfri also fllrtith
discuss to "Sc of Ifse proposed avisierr1 aatd t€Ie expected yield Irotn"le well versus the needs of Ehe
faclir#y. A description of the nrar s
P p ystenl for the septic Sys
�itown icari arkd its reSGrvc rapaeiry(its case of
Q PowuWa isle free plans,failure)should also be pr<rvEded, ��ie type of propresed pipe For tltr;]eat;hing facility is not
a-ii-ef} This seaectk tr)the i that the ap}plicalnt show tk c 7dequacy of the pxufaosed drain,-ip SystCnt withilY
and�icijatcrlt#n the site and thleir ability[o]t�rndlc qlc_irkcre&%td runoff,resulting from the
developat a}t, Iy]cre are no tErftin�Ige fxuili[ieS i111medialely adjacent to tlrc propur#y, h.l.as
discusscrp in see.#ion
5110 t..oll�l�c}�t�uireit��[s
The Plans indicate a prupsosod i;f sfopxe Hi tlac runt`of the parking ant area. 'at appiicanE's Fn '
verily that ID "uhsrrir.nis have bteat rne.#under dris section, g[ncer Should
T-kQ571L1c:a:nlnp"�bU3¢TkT17-a.l Ik;e Fk�'rscignala.doc 2
1, 'flee location of the Van Accessible handicapped parking spaces Should be identified.
2. The wheelchair ramps should he Iahe.led on tltc plans.
3. The applicant nuty want to provide purl}stops for Ciao handicapped parking spaces if the sidewalk in front of
the parking spaces is flush with tltc paveiurmt,
4- The applicant should indicate how tlttf proposed ImlIcl7 will =abiIi7A the W slope.
5- The location for the proposod bollards should be shown on the plans- The N11lard in the detail provided is
filled wiai c'uncrcte and not reatovable.
6. A dciail should lac provided showing hrxw the guardrail will be installed on the,3:1 slope.
7. The sloped granite edging detail shows thy. length of the granite edging to be 9" +vitlr G"of exposed face.
The edgi Fig will oatly be emhcd€ed 3"into the ground. Tht first 3" 1nches of dta pavement are bituminous
pavement,which means tho granite edging will cwt be pJaced in the cement concrete- This may not
prOA&d enough support tO lsofd the edgitrg in place. MassHighway oscs a rninirnurtt of 1I"granite edging,
8. 'file liar is of the sloped granite cufb should exicnE to the PC's on Sharpner's Fund Road,
9. More detail is required for the widening Sharpc:nees Fond Roast. The following questions should be
addressed:
a- Is there adcqufitc sight distance.at the intersection with route l 14? Wilt tree trimming be
required'?
b_ 1s there any existing drainage on Shafpa ur's Pond Road tltat needs to be adjusted?
c- The crass slope of the pavement is la pled as 2% but that appears inconsistent wish the grades
provided. The Applicant's Engineer slutuld clarify.
d- The 1imil of work is unclear. WhaEslopt and,nattirial will be provided to riratch inloexisliltg
condiEions?
a. There are utility poles located right at edge of pavement/shotalclor. Has,there been arty
consideration to provide prtrtcction for the]Mtorist?
f- The contour(elevation 152)w itrtersection wiEli Route 114 ties into the existing oon tour(elevation
154). The Applicant's Fogi near should review and revise the plans.
HT. GENERAL DRAINAGE ['f]HlYI1N:i:V`JL'
i. The soils inf'ortnation and the in-Iiel€1 percolation test data appear to be cantrxclietory. The Applicant's
ffitgineer should coofirin Ihat the assumed rype C parmeabiIity is a rcason2ib1c assumption bascd un thu
laCrc test reskiIts shad Ilse deed hAe rest results-
2- VHB reviewed the drainaw dcsi i using the plans provided in the draivage report-It appears that either
the graphic scale provide:is incorrect Or the listed iiutnea'ic scale is incorrect,or the firm of concentration
calculations arc incorrect. Tho Appiicant's Eztginw should confirm the information provided,
specifically ort the existing drainage areas,plan.
3. VJIB was only able to locate 2 of the 3 test pits on the plan- The Applicant's Englnrer Should show ail test
locations.
4- The detail providedI far a dcop sump carob basin sliovo;an HDPE-- hoWflow control device that extend to
within I font of the hase Of the dCrp SUMP, GiVOEI the WfttCr 1eYCi will generally stay 0 the invert
elevation, 3'aboal the bottom of the tea, how does the maintenance crew evaluate the depth of solids?
When the depth of solids exceeds i foot, rile Ecc will no longer funetion prupuly. 'I'Itc App]icfuaLos
Enginccr should revise.
5_ It appears there is an incorrect elevation on the detail of Ilse outlet control device. The value 1 N is 30 ft
lower than tho refaiitder of the structure-
6- Malt] is Iisted in test pit 2. The Applicant's Etigioeer should provide an estimaled seasnnal high.ground
water elevalion.
7- The applicant has accummodatcd sonic of the Storinwater 11421 agement 11olicy Ouideli nu,although the
site does aiot contain any resource areas subject to the Wetlands protcctioa Act. V1ID bas the following
cotrcerns,
3
TAW. 162"Ado g%rep rt%\0671M-tittle Trafessiaruls_iEoc
■ The applicant 3s factoring wastewater gtrneraliOn lrkM the calculation of recharge vol umc-
VIO C011cuFs that this N appr«priatc,h€aweya, Ilse wastewaler should not be includcd ire rise,
volurne of water Emated for TS5 removal.
* The detention basin is expected to rem ova up to 25%of remaining TS5- How will the
oluferground detention system be cleaned?
The applicant has noI provided for orl site recharge of runoff.
R- The Applicant's]Engineer should evaluate velocity in each of the proposed pipes based on the amount of
flow in the pipes and cortfarila that pipes will maintain self-cieaning velocities.
9. 'fhe(Neenah chart for K values has been prov Wed fpr calculation inlet capacities. Please provide tiro
remainitlg calculations showing the;w;o of the K value in determining the capa€;ity of the grates.
IV. TRAFFTC STUDY COMMENTS
In gcneral,the traffic report has bixri prepmed in a manner generalty consistent wish transportation MUM
mnndards. Hmvevcr,from ai tra nsporEation perspective, the impact analysis has a few areas where addi#ir nal
information would be helpfatl:
= Vehieie t=:rnsh/Accident data was not prewnted in thF,traffic report and there is no evaittation o f the snicty
of the off sitc traffic conditions for drivers entering 9harprlcrs Pon€!Ruud-;
• The turning radius fur at lira Mick,tile,largest truck aperatad by thr Norlh Andoyr r Fire 1. partmew,
entering and ufaEteuvering internally on site Awkkid lit:presented;
■ Vchiculair rlueiaing at the intersection of Roane 114 and Sharpners Fond Road should be reviewed can the
westbound Sharpncrs Fund Road appfoarb to determine if queuing will hripacl (lie proposed site driveways.
The following provides specific:cofnntents on the traffic study and provides traffic cottitlteftls on the site plan
submitted along with Ilse sta€Ey-
Traffic linpact and Access Sindy Review
In gcntaal, the sliEdy has been prepared ko industry.stimdaxrds using information and methods suitawbie for a traffic
impacE and acce-ss study.
Existing..C'oaad i 6i€�ns
The de_scriptioriof rho subtly re,rea and methodology kverc prr-serae€l its a mandard inortnef and appeal-to be,accurate-
The study notes traffic volumes wcrc colle�.ted bout mammily and mechanically(automated traffic rcuor€ler) in 2002.
-11e alb matle traffic ru:ordc=r(ATR)data col lecEed, when comparu3 to iv1 msflighway data for Rotate 114(Salmi
rRunpik,c)seems reatsurrabie.
Whicfe classification and maxnuul hireling movemmnt counts ,vcrc conduc.Icd in 15-mintile intervals for Elie weekday
morni ng(7,00--€ :UO AM)and weekday evening(4;Q0—6.00 P3+ )Naks. Al I Irafflc count locations appear to he
reasonable giVefI the arrrpnnt of traffic likely to be,getierated by the Lleveloprncnt-
Vehicle speed rneasurcmunts were conducted along Sharpers Pond Road using the"floaEing car method"-This was
done so that thw appropriate sight distanoe could be,•pruvidvd at Ehe proposed site driveway-This methodology is
gcncrnliy rtccepEAble(--IMO agh not preferrod),however soave exptanation should be provided rogardieeg the lower
than aavernge observed speeds along Shaxpers Poatd hoar(as it appruachEs Route 114. Prc:suinably,this was btxcftusr
vehicles were decelerating as they approached tha stoic sign at Routo 114.
As noted in tho surmnalry, theefe is Tin indle; ion [}sat crask/ac:cideut data for This area w,os collected or reviewed-It
would be lielpful to dtyteriniaie 1f exisling safety issues"rrewly exist at the intersection of Route 114(Salem
Turnpik-c)and Sh rpners pottier Road as add itiunsd traffic would likely serve to iucreasc the cappoFlurkily for crashes at
this location,
4
T�xfX,716�314n:91epoiN%o673779-Utlel'rc2rs5iona19dUC
Slrlrinjary—Tim analysis of the existing conditions as }presera-ed in the Traffic TmpacI and Aucrss Study appears to
be reasonable saki RLccurale and follows general indrlslty guidelille- Fer the prUmfttiott of a traffic imPft<t sEady.It
would be helpRtl gn tiro review of Ihis project if the applicant would provide histuvical accident data ou the study=a
ruadways so that any pre-existing roadway deftcioncies might be highlighted and addressed.
flljure Trafft�,.Voldine C9I�ditioU-9
'Frye study revizws tilt futuw, 08 No-Build slid 2008 Bki11 l scenarios,whicIs is a stt'lld d time 1Fame for tlpis
develtrpntelit. it is rioted ttLat the proponent uon4acted the planning office for the towns of Minh Atidover and
Middleton and a baAground growth rate of l percent was used to Account for future developynelits not antkipaled-
With list addition of cater projected developments for this area, the volume.of traffic traveling livough tho
interseaion of bouts 114 and Sharpness Pond Road 1 s expvxied to irwrease by approxi mateiy 14 percent, iucl udi ng
the F fierconi general growth, for both pctak hcmrasialyzed. 'T'berefow,the grawdl for this krea has been lalcen into
isecount RIO appears 10 be acceptable,
Frig ge eralic�Yt For the groposcct site was ckelermined xjsing data collected fmin cAher"Little Professionals"facilities
in Chelmsford and Wublim- While this is all accopi able rncthod for deterynine the nurnher of Brills that could be
expta d at this site,the sample sic include,
orriy twcr facilitiesuf wlyich apgcairs to aversfge 104 sluclept+. Wolf
below t}te 175 students proposed to omupy this site.
A comparisoll should be made Et}Land Use Code 565—Day Cr are Cciaef from Ehe Titsti#utc for TrartsgorRat inn
number of sludettt_%cxpccted ro attelld pre-school at this site.TM es#intrLtes
! ngincers(TTE)Sixth Edition. Using the
indivate that this site would gentyate(aging regression equations)approximately 900 daily trips(which is 55 Tpe€cent
snore trigs on a daily bx%is),and 135 mluekday cveu i ng peak hour trigs(40 percent more trips than presorted i n the
Et ar c slttcly - The tnornirpg peak Dour trips appear to be reasonable as cornpamd between the TTE estimates and
those pre-ccntcd its the report-
Trip distribkttiorYassignment to this site was deterTnined usingexisting traffic cents for the study area-'Phis is all
acccp#able rrmuthodology for assigning traffic to Ehc stress roadways,
. terf+ma — Le analysts of llte future corLditions as presented in tht:'T`raffit<hnpfict and Acce--s Study al)(rears to be
reasonable,however,the fo}lnlving additional iLtforrnatiatt should fie considered in the revietiv of tiro report-
'Phe trip gcrteration proposed For this site should be compared to the YFU standard and the more
cnatscrvsfRive valves should be consideced in the analysis especially if a signal is propuszd at the irttersCction
of Route 114 and Sharpness Pond kioed in the future.
'(rafftc Op�FatiEms al sis
T hn following is summary of Urc re uils fur the capacity analysis at Route 1141 Sharpners Pond Load and the;kite
driveway wilt Sharpners Pond Road-According to the analysis presented in ft traffic study,(lie westbound
5llryrpners Pond Road approach is projected,daring the 2008 Build Condition, to operate at Level of Smvice ([E].S)
F during the mtirnrng and LO D dUFing the cvetytstg peaks.which is;gat inerestse over the n Stilt!LC? of T and C
for the flatire cunditinn without this Project. It appears thiat vehicular queuing lryay c)ctuild beyond the bus driveway.
This should be reviewed to detcrirdne if this will occur and what 1ha irnpat:ts raay lx.,
Summary—'lire traffic study usCd Rhe approprislt<analysis software and one,hncls to attalyzc the inlarsi ctioofs and
rostdways wiffiita the sltidy are a.'T he.analysis is based on the most recent versiun of The Highway Capacity Software
(HCvS)and is art approved and widely recognil analysis tool for traffic operations analysis.
■ Vehicular giieuing at the iniersecEun of Routc 114 and Sharpners Pond Road should he rcvievmd on the
westltound Sharpness fond Road approach to dcte.rminc ifquavirig will impact site driveways
5
's':lUG7L6T}ktJot'Skee oabk{+f+717i'4-Li WC P.nfrss-sonal5 4o�
Sight Distance
'Lilt appropriate stopping and irtterscction sight Ciistance mea-Mireat3cnts ware determined using the standard
AASHTO references and the erieisttred speed-9 along Sharpncrs Pond Ruad. Existing sight distance tncasurenbents
wero cuncltFctail its the field and cmnp=d to ttse feciuiMtitcnts. It aPpettrs that all Sight distances meet the standards
providing that vegetation clearing netts`the driveway is rnainEaincd_
SwilOnary—Thu reportd€sctesscs the cle;tritig of ai triangular Area adjacent Io the site driveway to rnainTain a
Mini muM Of 500 feet in either direction for the Iik of the prOjeci, VHH agrees with this R1a11itenance tiF provide a
ciettr line(if sight for vehicles exiting the driveway.
Traffic-Mrrled Sitav Plan eviexv
The seta±plan indicates that the bid Iding develop mcnt is propased to bi, two fiorom 10talin8 l Z I m1uare feat of a
chid day care facility.Thri plan also illustrates 50 parking spaces Fhat include 3 halidieap spaces all of which is
based on 196 persons recessing the site{170 childran}.'l'he traffic sttuEy tefcrcnces 175 stat&nt<c,but is conseryativc
in comparison,
The apl}iicant should provide parking information at the otf r sites#hit Iltuy riraintain Io assure that-�tcleyuate pilrking
is provided ott sift. Parking sliould include k�th student drop-off and pick-lip as well as staff and visitor parking.
VXIB rucommands I1rat the Larking along thas sidewalk Adiacent to t€te bui€cling be dedicatvAl to student drnp-off and
pick-tip and That staff be Mquiral to puk on Ulf-opposite AdU of the I)arkitsg lot(to ill jai truxa the need for childmn
walking within tho travel aisle.
me appiic:tnt Should provide an AutoTurn 0 or similar flan showing the roxitvs for both gCi3UUi hussaR i'atrcl
emrgcncy response vehicles within the site_ VFlli rccommends thst the Town's fire.Chief n.r representative review
ihis iINfnrination to assure Ihcir curn fart with the plan.
The slsrdy rcco mTmnds That same clearing will he TNWrcd to proviJe tl:c appropriate sight distance inezmkirertteuts at
the site driveways, It is recoirunendcd that a cigar sight dirlaraue to the intersrction of the Site driveways with
harpni:rs Pond Road be pn)vided, approximately 5W feet,This should be shown on a ptan and 2a inaintertance
c&wment be provided to nssarc that these sight lines cars [w,a,laintained.
Finally. the propnseJ site plan spews two separate lanes exiting the site,huwcvar, the Mitigatioll Measures section in
the Executive Sonunary of the Traffic Study refurcnees only one lane_ The Execittive Summary of the mport should
he updatcd for clarification.
Project t4 itigaitun
The applicant has rnat#e a cuirunitmpnt to provide off site improverneltis to minimize the iltrpacts of Ibis dcvelopntcnt
at tine intemeclion ofSharpm Pond Road acid Route 114_'I'€teapplicant has Coinfni#ted to extending or construct€lig
the right turn lane on the Sharpers Fond Road approach in concert wills the deve€ppin=t("the Moadtaws")Ott the
opposite side of Rouse 114.
V11B would suggest to the Town t€tat these iluprOVCMents should take place-at the same time so as to cli nil nate the
need 10 fur reopening and cunstrucI[ng Ilrc roadway otr scpaFate accasions. Besides(lie issue of exposing moto.Fisis
to two construction periods,the quality of#hr con struction can he sacdficel as the pavetram#is Joffe iri two scpjratc
phases.
Ad€litionaliy, since this right lure ianc is an intiportftts#cog in the overall deveioptyment of this site, the Tnwn's
approval should be mid ngcnt on l' assHighway approval/acceptalice of this; rnridlfica doryconstructiun of the tight
turn lame.
b
T:k(a6716171doa rcr vlxkCf7iT J-UHLe ':nfrait�u3e.doc
Conclusion
The traffic study altd site PIM address the maj{�rity of> ter is_,Ocs witlt respcl:t to the devcluptiteitit of Lhe site, Where
are a few nutst riding issues that sh(mld be clarified to the salisfmiion of thc'i'owti and VAB,b"t khcsc issucs should
be tei4-11ively sirlipie For the applicant to provide in all ZLdditionaI S bmrssioti.
It is r"ornmended tkit the applicant provide WRI'r1'EN RESPONSES to the issues and t'oit1ments ccrntained
herciik,
-
Rev.ewed by: _... r -
William cotter, P'E.
Drainage Review
Reviewed by: .��f ,�'� Date' —
Trac ie Lenhardl
Civil Rsviow
Checkccl€►y: �.�.t � :
Robert I_,Nagi,11,E, PM0.17-
Trafl-ic Study Review
Cheeked by: ,. ..- I?ale• J
Tim lvfclntoshti P-E.
Projcct Manager—Ili ghway and Municilmi Ungineering
'r
'r
T; W Ify!?)4j cx ecpt fLj%067377}-L1t Lc P B.&c
{
TOWS] OF NORTH ANDOVER PLANNING BOAIUI
ENCINE:RING RFVIE,W OF SITE PLAN
FOR CONFORMANCE WITH THE'IDWN OF NORTH ANDO'VER
ZONING BY1 A W AND STANDARD FWG11yT:i:HING PRACTIC
Site Plark Title. Tittle Profemionals VHB No' 06716.79
I,ocatiun: 7 Lacwr a Circle
Owner: Anihony T'acilla&Stephanie Deangel is,2324 Twapike St,North Atrdover,MA 01845
Appiicant: Little Pmfc;ssionals Inc„7 Laconia Circle,North Andover,M A 01945
Applicant's Engineer: MTE Design Consu2taws,Tnc., 103 Stiles Rd Suite one,Salem,Nil G 079
Plan Bate: July 11,2,DO3 Review Date: August 19,2003
RevlwA Date: September 26,2003 Review Date: October 2,2003
Vanasse Hangen B rustlin,Inc- (VRB)has been retained by the Town of Korth Andover M pnivided a second
enj i necring review of t€re Site Plan for Littic Professionals. This review is uunducted in accordance with thr-Town
of North Artd[xvcr Zotnng Hyiaw,Massauhusetts Durartmenl of ErIvimnmeatrri 1'fotoction(1? l')Stormwater
Maimgemeut Policy and standard engineering-prae ice. V1[R has received tite following drawings and docuinentc
r for review:
Site J'iavis(10 sheets)dated July 11,2003—Tfevisccl Plans(I I sheets)dated September 26,2CO3
& Drainage Calculations—Revised Calculations dated September 23,21703
Response to Traffic Comments prepared by Den-not 1.KeUy Associates,hic.dated Sepkerrxbcr 2,2{)U3
In General llrc Applicant's)~ngincer has addressed several of the comments fnim our previous letter,however,a few
items sEill need to be i ddruscd. The re%ponses listed below follow Fhe ge=al outline of VHB's August 19,2003
Si to-Plan review letter_ For clalsity, VRB's original commew is shown followed by otir second comment shown in
I. NORTH ANDOVER ZONING BYLAWS
Section 4:Building and Uses Permitted
The Applicant has rquesttd a sl im permit to operate a daycare.facility within Tndustrial I District{f�l).
Vie Applicant's Fnghieer has inn crrtetl that a special peen it has been granted by the,Special Perntil C,rara frog
Awhoriry(SP A), Board ofAppmfss(BOA),
Section 5: Earth MaWrials I•ktmflyat
I'iease verity tL-1t au roquitements have been nact under the Earth Removal Ry-Law.
The Applicant's Fngbitrer has verif P&I rha1 this project weets are earth removal rr. 1d rements.
. 1
\��.{iwalAirkD573{79\horslrcpueibx4b71774-3_iiklc 7Rafcss:aoalePd44
Seefion 7: Dinlouslonal Regnerentcnts
T I Lot Area
The existing iotdues not rucet litr minimum lot area Shown in'Fable 2 of the NorEh Altciovea 7,unilig Bylaws. The
Applicant is requc-dings special perrnit rrom this requircmaht.
The Applk mire's Engineer ha.e tadicufed Mae a special pennir has been granted by the SIIGA (BOA)-
7.3 Yard fScthacR
The proposed building does nu coact the mi o}iinum front or side selbacks shown in'fable 2 of the forth Andover
Zoning Rylnws. The Applica w long rc{luesfed a variance for the setback requirerneatls.
77te Applicant's Engineer has indicated Mal a Special perm 0 has been granted by the SPGA (BOA).
Section S: SupplenwMary Regulatiorm
Section hj.SiIqFktnReYieW
&-I-S Jnforrnstinn]?e Wr
o) General; The.land,acatpe plans have naL heen signori and slatmpd by ccrli{ied architect. The Applicant
I
s requesting a1 waiver from this requirem mt. The Grading and Miiifies Plan,Sewage Disposal System,
and the fighting Plan&DetaiIs have not been stamped and signrd,
Mis comment IRM been addressed.
e-Vii) S#orrrkWater Drainagcr This Sectionrcquires Ihat dm applicant show the mirigalioro of stnrrn water
runoff to zero for like 2, 10, 100 year storms. The applicant has shown that the peak rates of runoff
have b-mn mitigated by the propu&O stormwater systein. ldowcver, the total quantity of runoff
from file sits has mt baton miIigaktc€l and shows an irocrea.%e ill the VoiurrlO of rnjtlUfT fr()rn tilt Site.
VHB recomfne ds the applicant consider the feasibility of a recharge systcm on site, Although thaw
soil Eypc shown on the SCS ilkaps is Iisled as type C,the peruoialion.rate of S minute,5 per inch
irkd icates that it is possible to locate a recharge systcm on site. See General Drainage Coniu=ts,
The Al pltcane's Engineer has addressed this cononew, VHB',s iwerpretation of tyre requirement is that Oi e-
tofrr!�a�uo voi4rraae s ward be�raitig�ted to zero. VHR recarurnends Gal the design eagitaeerprnvide
sallowery it fonnatinn,showhig Me rano 'rare and volunte for each discharge point. A?so, infillration
calcuInfirm s4ordd be included in the drainage report, The design engineer should trot base the drainage
analysis solely all the soil informarialt ill Ilse.SCS survey- Actual site conditions should.be evalrlated(gud
inearlporeded in floe fatal draineive report.
etxv) L;indseaping Plan:The material and size of the proposed fence atkd boulder barriers lkave not
provided. A shrub is labeled as TD on the prim and aR T11 jot the planting scfoedulc. There were
discrepancies noted in the nurrober of shrubs oat Ilse plans and is the plsnting schedufe. The
Applicant's Engineer should review and ftdjust accordingly.
The Appiicarkr's Engirazer has addressed dpis turner.
erixviii) Drainage Basin Study '1'lii2,section requires the applicant prclvide a drainagt basikt study for Lhe
site, Part of this study inciudts rho evaluatiolk of downstt'eam irnpactg ort thr existing dtainage
systekn. The applicant drre,9 not prrivide di mission nranalysis ofthr-dowastrearn umkditions tither
than then The reference to we;laud Yesource areas. Vl B reconalle ids the design envinezr discuss
where the runoff goes after leaving the properq. Also scc Gerreratl Di-ainage C aInments.
V7 e Applicant's Engineer has addressed this rommeet.
2
*�I�n+'.lkrlie\{W71C,79\dxskm�:fl8kkY717N-Lihle�`mrrsiaw3lx�dp4
e xax} Tiraffic impact Study; Sri Traffic Study tvomonents.
e-xxi) Utilities. See Oeneral and drainage ConumenN.
Review Critcrid Desi n Guideiines
a-YI-C} This suction requires that the applicant show the ability of the proposed sewage disposal and tivater
supply systen s within and adjacent to the sire to serve the proposed use. 'flue applicant sheareld
provide a desc:ripi ion of the deinD nd for water Mtse and(lie expected sewage generation rate with a
co npaii son to the design parameters of the proposed systems_ The applicant should also further
discuss the use of tho proposed cistern and the expected yield from the well versus the needs of the
facility. A description of the pump systel n for the septic system and its reserve capacity(in case of
a power failure)should also be provided. The type of proposed pipe For the leaching facility is not
shown on the plans_
The Applicant's EFig freer lines addressed th fs commerer. Portions of t)je buildirtg seas er}vill ha less thArr 3
feet of cover, wh Rch is a standard in ini'mum cover or S D,R 35 PVC pipe stab ected to vehiridar-load. The
design Engineer shoedd revimv the seructural adegarucy of the proPosed PVC pipe_
a-i i-d) This section rcyui Fes that the applicant show the adequacy of the proposed drainage system within
and adjacent to the site and their ability to handlo the increased runoff resulti ng from the
devclopmem There are no drainage facilities immediately adjacem to tho gropetty but as
discussed in section
The Applicant's Engineer has addressed A is continent.
': 8.i{J Y.ot{�1n co Re�nirer�cnts
The plans indicate a proposed 1:1 slope at the rear of 6a parking lot area. The applicant's Engineer should
verify that all requirements have been met under this section.
The Applicant's Engineer has addressed this compnent.
11, GENERAL COAMENTS
1, TiYc location of tht Van Aoxessible llundicappcd parking spaces should arc identified.
The Applicant's Eyrghteer-Ixrs addressers ih is contineirt.
2. The wheelchair ramps should be labeled on the plans.
71re Applivaiil'e Engineer has addressed this cornmerri-
3. The applic ant may want to provide curb stops for the handicapped parki ng spaces if the sidewalk in front of
the parking spaces is flush Willi the pavelnent_
The Applicant's Engineer ferns addressed this comment.
4. 'I`he applicant should indicate how the propckwA mulch will stabilixc(lie 1,1 slope.
The ppliewne's Ffigineer has addressed this f-mimrent.
5. 'rhe location For the proposed hollards should be shown on the plans. The bAlard is the delail provided is
filled with concrete and not removable,
The Applicarri's Engineer ha.s address i
ed ris rominerri.
6. A detail should hr provided showing how the guardrail will be i nstalled on tho 3:1 slope_
3
��Mxw81s\Ml9LF t{0'Jxd[•:8�r#�,orYs�U6F1779 i 11Y1e Lhofei6io15,�18'Ldoc
Slice file Ruardrad ill the 3,1 Slope has been reiuvved from sae project, this Coitrmerri has been uddresareel.
7. The sJopM Vaioite edging detail shows the length of the granite edging to be. "with 6"of expuscd face.
The edging will only be embedded Yinto the gmund. The first 3"inches aI'the pavement are bituminous
pavement,which means the gronke edging will not he placed iii the cement umorete. This may not
provided enough support to hold the edging in placu, MassHighway uses a rninimurn of 11"granite edging,
The Applican i s Engineer ha.s adds essed lids carniraeut.
9. '11ke limits of the sloped granile curb should extent to t#a PC's on Sharpner's Volad Roads
Tire Applicant's Engineer has addressed th is eomiPment.
9. More detail is required for the widening Sharpeners fond Road. The fallowing questions should be
addre&wd,
a. Is there adequate Bight instance at the intersection with Route 1 l4? Will tree trimming he
requited?
The Applicarrt'.s Eng Neer has addressed this coin nenr
Is diere any m fisting drainage on Sharpner's Pooid Road That needs to be ad fasted?
The Applicant's Engineer has addressed this comment.
b. The cross slope of the pavenic tit is labeled as 2%but that appears illconsisleni wills the gradeq
provided. The Applicant's Engineer should clarify.
The Applicant's Engineer has acid reaserf fins continent.
c- The limit of work is unclear, What slope and niiatariai will be provided to match into Cxegting
conditions?
Vie Applicant's Eng ureer has addressed siis comment.
d. There are wilily poles located right at edge of paveniwid shouldcr. Has there beau any
consideratinTj to provide pfoteclioro fOr tho mot<lriSt?
Me Applicant's Engin eer has addresiwd A is cornrirmat by proposifa g shorl segments of guardrrrd.
A70toagh guardrail is-ri safety measxre, h does not appear to be practical for tlNs application
becaase Erect bearer rail requires rare offset disiauce fromfixed objects for deflection as Flfrr.strueed
in she AA H7O Randside Design Manual- VRI?sriggests providing shorl seguaerrts of Curbing
(Ivilh praper Zalwrs tO accoinnioelrrfe slow Plows)to provic a profectlon.
e. '111a Contour(CIGvation 152)at intersection with Rouic 114 tics into flee existing contour(elevali€an
154)- The Applicant's Enghheasr should review and revise the plain.
The Applicant's big ureer her rrr1gressed this cominefrt-
I17. GENFRAT,DRAINAGE E:[}1ViMEN`)€'
I- The&ails informalion and the in-field per-.relation lest dam appear to bo contradictory, T'lie Applicant's
Enginccy should confirm that the assumed type C permeability is a reasotoable assuruption bisect on the
pert test results and the deep hole rest restilts,
Me Applicaw's Engineer%us not able to addre ws INY corrmaeni biif will provide furgher backup w a hater
date- fix co+otr+aeretS-3 S,e-vii, flee design engineer slafo.r f tat the SCS inap,s der uof appear to accurately
depici the oil she c«ildillons. l7ie rlesi,�ir err�iitear adder}u C tarraerit to the drairigge crrlciefrrfr'ans rl�at till
percofatlorr tale lea-q uo rfli'eci c�rrelrrtioie fo the laydroingic�'�lci�laiioris. Tie drairragc d�segrr sJiaarld lie
bused on the wasr accuraeo inforw4vion available, irrrlilding field col f rotation. VHB recommends sae
4
\llrfawatr\[c Ud71 d79kd«skrcpnrtcLr 71 9 [All,RofcAoiwls Fdoc
design eergalaeer evaluate the site soils to determine the oapropHafe sods classification for rrmuff
2. V1T8 rrviewed the dt'aianage design using the plans provided in tree drainage rtport-It appears that ei#hEr
the graphic scale provide is incorrect or the Itsted numeric scam A incorrect,Or the ti me of COncentraticsn
cair-ulatiolts art incorrmt. The Applicant's Fngineer should confirni the informal ion provided,
spcciioeaEly on the existing drainage areas plan-
Tile Applicant os ruigineer has addressed this romineal by stating the data will&confi ed. VHB
suggests the engineerpruvider additional iliforlredltioR prior fo approval.
3. VHB was only able to locate 2 of the 3 test pits on the plan. The Applicant's Engineer nhijuld silo a I I tese
locations.
The drainage cf;jCidarions�silaw only one rest pis log- That log classifies the sail as re gr'aval, Would
g rave;njateildtl be expected in type c.snip 71jet plan will only xlr vs 2 test grits and 1}sere test, The
design engineer should show all fesf pits osr the sire arld Pro fhe dogs for sfie tesx e.
4. 'l'i,e detail provided fur a deep sump catch basin shows an HDPE I1nodJtlow cantmi device that extend to
within 1 foot of the base of the deep sump. Given the water level wilt generally MAY at the invert
elevation,3'about the bottom of[be tie.haw does the fnaintcnance crew evaluate the dcplh of solids?
When the depth of solids excaeds 1 foot,the ice will no longer Tune#inn properly- The Applicant's
Engineer should revise,
The Applicant's Engineer has addressed this comyneaf-
'' 5. 1t appears tilers.is an ittcocroct elevation on the detail of the outlet colltroi device. The value 108 is 30 ft
' lower than the rcraai nder of the strut ture,
The Applicant's Engineer has addressed this commeor,
b, mottling is IisEed its test pit 2, The Applicant's Engineer'should provide an t;atirnated seasonal high ground
water elevation.
The Appli anr's Engineer has addressed th is continent by staring the data will be wertfled V119 Sttggesfs
the enginowr proviclk additional infornmetion prior to approval,
7- The appiicant lino acconimndated some of dw Stonnwa#ar;Ulanagemcnt Policy Ouidelines,although the
site does not contain alny res'rurce areas SUbject to the Wctl�jnd- protection AcL VHB has the following
concerns:
The applicant is iactoting,vastcwater generation into thccaEculation of recharge volume.
13R concurs that this is appra Eia#e,howcver,than wastewater should noE be included in the
vajlnine of water treated for TS S reranval. 7Iie opplivant core take recharge credit for she
wastewater that ix ilifiltraled or1 site, huwever, since the sparer is comingfi'om a well a1i sire,
r1re appliceupl would have intake a negative credit for the si ufer reruoved front fie well. the
negative credit and the positive credit will balance each other. Recharge is necessary an thus
site to miflg,ate Me lolol r1en vvlU1);e from the sitC_ That vole Ile is indleperident franc the
lvastewafergdeaere Pion Calculations_
The detention basin is expected to remove up En 25%ofrernaining TS . blow will the
underground detention system he Cleaned? 771e prapused Srorleatech,rysrern dues roof have a
bottvrrt section, rafheFr the bolrom is an exposed bed of crashed stone- If seems to make.sense,
tdedrt once suspended sohde enfer the ddelerrtion syrteni, they 3vill settle our and clog flee voids in
file s(nlre. It does not appear flint file njoinfenancex of this system is practical- A.T such, VIR)
. 5
l\PSawatrldr%.Wd]B" L-:1kec POT ts\E16F1Tl'!.Lim13 PsLAtE6�n.xls 2cl ti
reconimands ehal the applic4w provide addiiioual detail and drscxssinn regarding
enaintenance.
• The Rpplicant has not provided for oil site Techafge ofruntxff. T-heAppiicant's Ghgineer has
addressed this coww,-nt beif slravirlprvvide addilionaf infrlrrafjou crr�culariora.s_ Vul,,rne
calcidaefonr should be Oicluded in tire drainage sinnonary.
S. The Appi icant's Ertgi neer sliould evaluate Vduci ty in each of the proposed pipes based on the amount of
flow in the pipes and confirm That pipet %vial maintain:pelf cjeaning velocities.
The Applicant's Fngineer has addressed flus carnmeoef,
9, The Neenah chart for K values has been provided for calculation.taut capacities. Please provide the
remaining caloulations showing the use of the IC value iu dcterrnining thu capaciCy of Ilse grare<e_
Tree Applicant's Engineer i=addressed this evnirxen, however the caiclAhVions were not found in the
repori inchided.
IV. TRAFFIC T DY COMMENTS
VHB has reviewed the Rcsponse to Comments preparod by DJK,Inc. for the proposed Little E'rotcssianal Day
Care C'entcr located in Norlh Andaver.MA. While the majority of corm ants have been addFessed,the
following items still need clarificatiorn VHB's comments listed bdow wilt fallow the fogamt of D3K's
rr.sponse in coinincnts;
C Lnemenf 2 and 21 It was mcntfaned Ow the updated Preliminary Site Plan was discussrsd with tilt Fire
Chief in detail. VIiB defers to the Chief on his thoughts oot this issue.
01 fitrteaf 3 and J4—There is no mention of vchicular queuing in the April 2003 Iraffic mport;however,
the Symhro analysis spreadsheets do indicate that the projected yuuues oil Shmpner's fond!toad at the
intersection with Route 114 are calculaled to be 1 l 7 fc&t in the mondng and 32 feet in the everting. It
should be notcA that these queues assume tfla propnged retitigalion is in Constructed. Without the mitigation
the rnoming queue, the most cr€ticat,is 198 feet,which blocks Ole bus entrance intersrxtinn 165 feet away.
The other site driveway is 281 fcct from the intersection and it%vntlld appear that queues would not mach
this site driveway.
Cal
6gylt 13—As regtwsted,additional trip generation corrtipuriscrns were not made from the data collocred
at previous sites and rrE;themfore Comment 13 was nat addressee!. VHF3 is concerned that the higher
traffic gencrarian will resuIt in longer vehictc queues critcxing and exiting the site FLnd st the intersection of
Sharpner's Pond Road and Route 114, Th is may have art impact oil the finding,noted in Corn ments 3 and
14 abnve_
comment 20 The new si to plan does not indicate that the park i ttg aloha the sidewa Ik cirisest to die
building That will be dedicated to student drop-011-and pick-tip.Pmper sigesage should Etc pragented for
employes and for drag-off and pick-ups to ensure the Safety Of the children entering and exiting the
fhuflky.
tk
1�hiawatrli�� 7lBT9\docskee�arJx\G�J177z1-i�NecPrafrsinnal��_{j¢;
Co+rturew 24•-The Town's appraval Of this project should remain coadirioned upon lhee auuupta nce of the
right turn fans being wastructed along Sharprrer's Pond Road as it approaches Route 114. SbouId
assl-lighway deny the s:Ptrlicanis request for this right turn: lane,for whalever reason,the Town shoidd
considtr revisiting this issue with the applicanz-
Zt is rezununendcd that the applicant pmvide WRITTEN RESPONSES to the issues and uoiwneo%contained
herein.
f�
Reviewed by, �' � Date- t �
Williams Cotter.P.E.
Drainagt Review
JoReviewed by: � .., E3atc;
Tracir-Lcrhardt
Civil Rtview
checkcdby. �. Date-
Robert L.Magi RED`.,P,TAE.
'I}afbc Study Review
/40
Checked by: �� Dote:
1�m
McIntosh P.E.
i'rnjcet Managcr—Highway and Municipal T ngi necrittg
7
kta,anwatrkortn6aa6T7karc��Mpa�Ss�0�+7s779-uk�lrpfara�a2t«
s ra,irus port fiiorni
1Cu7vnro,ri ui
sere i L: e,
BtM�-tu �amni[m lti Yu iu� rol lbiw 11prg fvT L1flp:j,jj:,�jpdbvpu filslax Amdar.00�rmhur:r.�mv��t�us
Setnteur ber 5,200.
lief. 0671679
J'.Justin MiciAs
'Town Piannner
t_'omnnnunity Develo.P.neunt&"services
Town of North Andover
27 Ch1 irles SIree't
I la mrth Andover, MA 01
Re. Engineering Review c,uf Little Professionals Site Plan
North Andover,
l c,ar)Ust.inn:
l
Vamasse l-fmrn en fir U tlinn,laic, (VHB)has lheen retw9imed b the Town of North Andover to, provide a
econd enn irueerinm review for tl°roe al owe listed project. l�h origi nail reviewed t4his project o n
Auu ;uust'l9,,2003 In response to our original review the applicant has submitted the following
information.
0 Me orannduurn to Justin Woods prepared by Karl Dubay dated Auu ust 29,200
R �paannse to cumme nts prepared by Dermot J.KcHly Ass mates,Inc. daked September 2,.2003
t .
i
Please nnoLe that revised site plaan,s and drainage calculations were not submitted to V Hll. 'T'he
' aln fmlicaant stmates that[lie plans will be revised, lnn general,most of V HB's cornmmennts hwnve been
adeq uat.c.1y addressed, VH11 aecorrnrrmennds that revised lalnens be submitted.for ffirual review to confirm
Lhat the original comments h,mwre been add u esw',d.
Vl-115 has reviewed. the responses to corr,maennts offered by D]KAssociates., Mille wwe are satisfied
with the restnornscs offered,we strungly reconnnnend that the applicant continues to Ru,rstle the
im lemnnentatiorm of a right tun un lame at llne.liantc.Tsr ctionu.of Sharpnvrs Pond Road arnd Route 114:.
Should the right turn lane not be connstruucted, for whatever reason, the traffic rquuctie resulting,from
both the Me,,Wow's develolnmmrecnt and the pruposed Little Professional's development has the
poteunti I to block Line access to and from:the Little Professional s driveway,
While we noLe that M assl figliway dots have Elie ability to permit (or deny) the cons.truuctuoun of this
turn.4me, [he project rnay not operaatu, i,m a safe mend efficient manner wwvi,tl ool it, For this reins-on,VI IB,
fCV-1t; that it is irnpuurtanmL that time development be conditioned on this i-i ht turn 9anc,beiun,q
constructed prior to the opening of the Little Professional's project,
101 Waluful Street
Post,ON c,Box 9151
%,,N taw nN,ir%iewrdrat67'9W;ai leh e,6"1F4IInlrPrafC5%% ai,A Lrxilbc ernaijd: into,@Yvfib-c:oifil'%
Mr justin Woods
Prnjc-4ct No.: 0671.679
,qeFAen)ber5,2003
Page 2
VIIB,awaits reccipt of the. revised plam aud Should you hiive any queslion";or
require any additional inforn-talion, please feel free to conlact me at.Your collvvr,dp.nce.
Very truly YOUM
VANA�SSE HANGEN BRUSTLIN, INC.
0 106 4/
Timothy B.MdAtosh, P-h-
Projed iage ®Highwi!ty& MUllidpal Zen ginceri.:ng
CC. Rob Nag i,VI IB
N Ulawaks'%lie NiW736-19\&KO I elvwq I inr,HHRrprcde.Auvia2 L doe
Transportation
LarLd Development
Environmental
fern ce5
imaTnal�onl�nrvowtrorv:r�.rgy{'r.nr�.Y,l:.l,vn.i�la.i.rr.:rtin_nrl:rra�r.k�r:n�i�.-.
l cytutsse kfanrgen Bruin,Inc.
Sep:er.7bei S WaS
Hip` Cf)7:5.79
.;1r51t.w0ccls
TCwn Pla_v,pr
Comrr.0L'L2y Dcvct,,�prrecnt Sc Se; cm
Tawn of Nw r.n An3uvt�r
V C:oC.LLS SLrecL
Nort,Andover,NiA.LM
Re! tuy`tree!iag11tMewo=Li-.t:e':okss:of.isS:t^_ :an
Nor b Andover,UA
Dear juskL�:
w'a H:,ngen TSnasi, :nr.tkri3;N*Lxv.-rc!ainec:by the Town of Nofk-z A_13ower U R-ouide a
s7oor,�w-ginccrfng review for Lh: above ls!Lxi pig 2L VH5 nxigina;lg reviewed this pm-&aR
AcglsL 19,ND3. Ir.rc*ppr se to awr ari&aJ revica.'the applicgnk has submi`ed LhE:oaowLng
iralomutioa:
• Men&randumLojc Liu:tiaresprcpaTedb-VKSTLDal:mt•daLedA-LFL r2r,2Kq
Resra,3�Loom me.Is'vTMi,7hd by-Derrick.!.JCLLly As%px�tn.lac.weed Septerr,'aer�za�3
AeasA rWku;-,.at rc'xised six plans and drasaSvc;Jr;Jakiuns were LwL subm3..,ed to V-2. i=
ap�licank sta.es:hak Lhu plWnc w'I,be xvised. Ln gcn=4=,pet o:VI-15 s corr-menu Mwe bee
Wcga iWy nddresmd. VHIT xco,=ends;yat revised pL.vo be subnk.ed ta-fnr .rmicw ro con3m%
16L the q-rLp'cummcnla have 1*cn acdi;ssr,c.
VL:3has xvLowed khe responses to wm7nerms offered byDJxA9sceiaLm- W4 Zc vm are satisCLed
with:h4 resr,;p scs offered,.we strongly rera=gr4;hit tl'a appLicar t Lmr",)uts to p-.usuc:be
impLeihonka!ac Qt a light ti;r-.1 lane ar Lne LUerseCLL5n o}_41«raers Po;Ld Road rnd Rouse 114.
Shou;d-.he r'o.t tug'.Lmv nor ac corstructedr for w.akever-eaAcp,thv trarw qucue resulting J~cm
both the N.ea orw's deueLopr,u.t and tlroc FTopmed LL.tle?ofssioe,Lx dr IaFMmr Fos the
Wc;eada l to Mock'm access ko a:d.ro-T the Gre iyofessiona.'s drlwewsy.
%%%Jt� %br- 5Hig:awa4r doe3'awe'.w ab J-fy tv pca:ut(or dent';.O�,e eomtrutaL of e-ds
turr,Lsne,L)e prujuct a7ayroe tgcratc Li n safa a_fd ^ia,.mr;vif-Lcurit, Fei this L%eason.�.'ri6
ite1t tha;it is irrporf nt!-haL Lne dnelupz,r_L-=r 4i rioncd aer tl'Js right-urn Lme ipg
eunskrur:L¢d prior'a tr,e ope:ingo='h&L:I;;u Professione:'5prcjc,2!,
i'I'.ValnuL ilfmL
resL vf=t_'?3k 3'it
Sk�.Ybvr+,Massjcnusr-Ls G17r' a151
'.txu��5�.4ksir_vJx-+i.�R.ti r-i�yna...a«i,i,t d1 P.9X4>1774.;AA 61 F.92-1.2286
e�na:: ix a8vieco,t
•r,.w h a,ro�
1%1 11 YVLuds
Ko.: 5716:.-
xpwmb,r 5,2CO
V218 3WML�TUC�-'P'of the TeV;SQd PrJqS W j dTlmag thciu:d you--Llvv a-iy�jkst'ws or
taqu iE%2 alvy'ndcU`ma'L-Lfam.aHtin.plm,�fee_h-&-b dantact.-me It)rjr ranwmnkh6e.
Vey trjjy,Ou-&
VANS SE c]-;LLNGSN 8RL:s-rJN,INC.
Timcikhy it.lyl - cosh,7�E.
PrdjM MwaFr-F):jY,.wpy&Munkipat T;n&qccr.T.g
cc; Rob Nagi.Vl-a