HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-04-10 Engineer Review SPR G
COLANTON102
1 . KatWeen Colwell
Planning Director
Town.He11 Anmx
North AxWover, MA 101945
RE, Supplemental Enghtecring Review
rOwd Hill Road Lot 1- 13-I
Mar Ms. l el,l.
Jr1 response to, w request, Coler & Colantonio, Inc, has reviewed the revised Site. Plans
for the above re eren ed site. "s correspondence till s the fOrmat of our previous
letter dated March, 11, 199& 13te revised submittal package included the following
information-
Pl"s ntiiled.
"'Site Ply Lot 1-2 -t Orchard lfill R ''"two sheets dated Fcbruary 10,
1999, last reviwd 3/201 '11., W pared by Christiansen& Sergi. R=ived on
"Plan Land—NorthAndoverk ownedr by George R.Barker,,.Jr."dated
December 12, 1,997, Prepared by Scott L. Giles, „ ". . .,Frank Giles,
North Andover. Deceived on Mar h 27, 1998.
Response Letter dated March h 4, 1999,
Our curmitixtrajivnts are found in.italics:
zoning Bylaws
l- Section 83) . e)ii.) Thcre is aso reference toa plant endorsed,by a]registered Lmd
Surveyor. A plan slamped by a Registered Land Surveyor indicating proposed lot
granges has been provi&id
s t"ection 8.3 .) e. iv)The pl i indicatcs the ul de sac easement. 1t is unclear wbat is
r posed as the al roadway layout, l ' understand,t tie. 1 11P1 rr will address
this issve-
. Section 8, ) ,,) ,)v,t) See drainage issues below.,
101 Accatd ParR Drier 781 913 -54
I
,, Sev, ion 83) .)e. iix.) Building elevations,have not becu 3tibinitt d to us with this plan
sa It is unclear if the Planning Board received this irufuuu at;ion. , ofirt - r°comment
, Section 8A) .,)e.) )°l1he Building inspector should review the plans f t ADA
compliance. Nbfurther c(,-),m ent.
,. Section, 11, .) .)e.,) i.) No wetlands are:indicated on the plans. Sativfactoey.
7. Section 8. •)e.) xiii.)A detail should,be 1ncltudcd for the handicap access ramp.
Satisfactory.
. )iScction , .)e.)auv-)The plan does not indicate,exisfivg tzees. It is unclear if'the
landscape plan c nferins tru"I`own requirements. We route that there are no plan. inns
along the northern pmperty list` adjacent to,the Montage road.Nio Ar,ther cornment.
. Section 83) ,)e x ii A detail of the fighting fixture to be used should included in
the planget. Lighting units do not,show connections to,utilities.. ,"uatisfartor .
10, Section ll. ) :) c.) i) It is assumed that a"U"indicates cable wilitie& This, line is
n l..et 1- and will require an c asernent., A fifleen-foot wide utdiiy easement it
indicated on true r vised",plan.
11. It is om understanding that Sections 83) 5:) a xi,, x , xxii,xxiii, are typically
reviewed by Tow Staff, Nofiurff er comment,
Maj a gc Issues,,
12. 10"" flared end d:is luuuru s on to abutting prop at a point., Tbis area draw of
c ntl: appear to receive coxicen,trtttetl flow. The design indicates this pipe wound
—.-Ohly discharge in storms atcr than a' - r, 24 lour event. 2"he Planning Board
should address whether are easement across the abuttingprQperty it r ired at fimv
location-
1 3. e detrutioruli ,llltrtion basin bnttrn is shown to be at elevation tom.
r uurud outer level in the test pit data is estitru t d as, 10,L . e roc end, a.
ruuiruirr urn ;,5 p ration of two feet between groundwater and,the base of leaching areas.
The test pit log does not clearly indicate the presence of mottling,however identifies
the estimated water table as '10 1. . Comment rein ains.
pit data, for Infiltration area 3 sh rind be provided. Ale t st1iit data,qppgary
4„
'nsistent acravr the ftont of the property, We recommend that soil suitability be
(1-Unfirmed during construction.
t . Additional spirt grades should be indicated the parking lotto show pavement slopes,
Sa i actors;.
16, tcinn druuin pipe ealcuule,ti,ons, including inlet grate capacity 5houa,ld be p
mvided.,
„—,. 'Section . S'.) Vii)(?f the Zoning yl alvs fior the toga t(North Andover requires all
St&rtaa water drainage age con trcaj,ttcilitj .v to,be shown onplan and all q "t e calcidations
hick support the pl a e submitted to this DPW. Our concern is.,with, the inlet
cqpavily,of Catch Basin J (US ) and to tt lesser tle -ree svttla Carch,Basin ,(CB
B'� receive ru nofj r z the south and southeast ornery of the parcel along
w,itla t o higher lava d that svrr un it, if water was to bypass, the cale h basinF it a oualr
17, The location of the Septic systems on the abutting property slrauld be iadieaatC&
IS'. In fj gtration values, used, appear reasonable berme 'on ouur review of to t pit data and
NRCS infonnaticrn., To expedite the t' viewing,praaieess, we recommend that the
applicant t descries thehasis used for infiltration rates„ The 4", orifice i t4t.e owlet
structure,will be saibject to clogging, We recommend the structure be modified to
pr vide;protection from clogging. 1011'P tion values are s° tis�ictar .
We appreciate the opportunity to assist the Planning Board on,this project and lope that
tinis inforina,ti as is sufficient for you needs„ We ww Wd be pleased to meet with the Board
or the design engineer to discuss this project at your iconveigence, If yon have arty
questions p1ease do aunt hesitate,to contact tu&
vet ftty YoUtS,
Sohn,C.
Chessia,p. m
CCChristiansen& Sergi
Jim Rand, DP''
i 07/- ? tfd 14:56 NO.066 Doe
N _ s
ND 20ENTiS.I`3
FN
t
July 2, l 998
1s, at1I enColwell
Plarmiq Director-:'-
Town Mall Mr)Cx:.
30 8cijool street
oath Ar►dov�r,IAA Q1843 � -
RE. Decision v.t, P viow
OrehArd Zfill Road Y:at 1-2R-i
Dzar Ms. olwag:
In xrsponse to your INUA olur c$ olantonio, lnc, has reviewed the mv#s�c# Site P1an5
for the above f rei d:site, This corres pondv= is in response to the 'Notice of
Decisiwf' mado.by Ole TM of North An vor. -M revised submitUd package irxcIudcd
the following infotunation".:.
'+ Plans End dod-
• `"Side Pin Lot 1-28.1 Orchard Hill R, d"two sheets acted February 10,
1081t14t tvviseci 6f9M,propared by OhrjAansm 8r Sergi, Received on
yuae 1 l;1�98.
• RMP01M.L.etser dated June 10, 1998.
Our comments fi,Alow tht format of the Planting Home's Special onditions Letter, our
camxnents are i�italic�. :
a.) The bW1ding.&si8n must be modified to show o duk rolowd,non-shiny rc�af, the
Planning Board weldreview the vfevauon,
b) Erosion controi must be shovm on#h�pla;x. +Seaftsfwftwily addreEscd, SjUaftonfenets
are, indicated on tk plaw-
o.) Storm drain,pipe alculafloa,in'ciuding grate capacity should be Provided far the Catch
H asins 3 and 4 to confirm that wnW wi It not bypass theso basins. Sai4factorily
addr e.ssed Calcdwions have been submitted, double grate has been fndlecat d for
CB's 3 and 4.
d.) DPW to review add approve wised uW-do-sac design. ne DPW is to review the erul-
d��y-crc
FO r Accord?ark OriVe 781%2-6AOO
Norwell, M
07/02/98 14 9—, 41 91.064;
e) A drainage ea:semient will be required to contain the flow fro he 18" pip ,a;
properly across land of Buker, Sdrisfderorily addressed. A drainage eas `........... ..............
been addM to the plans.
C), The I.Inal plan must bc rcviewed anw proved by the drama consultant,DPW a;nd
the Town Planner and subsequently endorsed by the Planning board. Thr, finvil,plans
mu,,,,l be wbmiaed forreview within ninc:ty 14ysolfiling the lcci3ion with the To"I,
Clerk. San�facfordy oddigssed
A bond in the am, ount of$7,000 shall io,postoJ for the purpose of inauring that a final
-5ite utilities, structures, curb, Brats„parking
as-built plan showing the loication,of all on
spam and drainage facilifies is submitted. The bond is also in place to insure that the
site is constructed in accordance with the approvod plan. This lion dual] be in the
f6m)of a check made out to the"F"Fawnof North over, This when v I will then be depo.,;ited into anintere,,,tb ar,i,n, s, rowaccoiint,, Tobeaddie.t.v,,edbythorolv?7,f)J
North AndoverPlanning Board
We appreciate the opportunity to assist tire'Planning Doald on this project and hope, that
this information is,sufficient ("br your need& Wc,would be plemsed to nieLt With the Board
Qr the design eng jnmer t discuss this proj,ect at your conveniimce. It you have guy
questions pltaae do not hesitme to contact us.
Vety truly Yours,
COLER COLANTONIO, INC.
John C. Chessia,P,E.
cc, ChTistiansen& Sergi
Jim Rand, DPW
is
urn
mce/JCC