Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003 Application SPR WITHDRAWN Od d L,4architects and planner s Limified 16 July 2003 Justin Woods, Planning Director = '; }`r;#VE North Andover Planning Board 27 Charles Street 001, North Andover, MA 01845 Nc 0'j11 ANtN)VLrj Reference: Foster Farm Elementary School VkANN(Nt I3 I� it7MEN� North Andover, MA Subject: Application for Site Plan.Special Permit Dear Justin and Planning Board Members: We submit to the Planning Board a completed_Application for the Site Plan Special Permit with the required attachments. A Table of Contents for this filing package is included in Attachment 1. Enclosed are 10 sets of the application including one signed original. Your plan sets include 3 full size sets of plans and 7 half size sets. I am also forwarding you 3 sets of the complete Notice of Intent with full size drawings and 2 copies of the Traffic Impact Study Appendix. By .copy.of this letter one additional complete copy of the Planning Board submission, Notice of Intent and Traffic Impact Study Appendix are being sent directly to your consulting engineer. I have enclosed two sets of envelopes addressed to abutters and thirty envelopes not addressed with the required,postage. If there are any questions please do not hesitate to contact Rick Rice or myself. Sincerely Jon Oxman AIA DiNISCO DESIGN JO/dmp cc: Timothy McIntosh, Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Louis Minicuccl (Attachments 1-3 only) Paul Szymanski Nancy Kurtz Patrick Saitfa Kenneth DiNisco (Attachments 1-3 only) Richard Rice (Attachments 1-3 only) Enclosures: Attachments 1-20, LF1 (See Table of Contents, Attachment 1) Traffic Impact Study Appendix (Woods, McIntosh, Szymanski, Kurtz, Saitta,) Notice of Intent (Woods, McIntosh, Szymanski, Kurtz, Saitta,) 02458.0 PlnBrd Cover Letter Kenneth Dildisco Richard N. Rice Gary E, Ainslie Christopher Huston Donna DiNisco 8 7 S u m m e r S t r e'e t E3 a s t o n M A 0 2 1 1 0 6 1 7 , 4 2 6 . 2 8 5 8 f a x 4 2 6 . 1 4 5 7 w w w . d 1 n i s c o , c o m I tl-�I V UGC= a r c h i t e c t s a n d p l a n n e r s Limited FOSTER FARM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN SPECIAL PERMIT ATTACHMENT 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 16 July 2003 i Reference: Foster Farm Elementary School North Andover, MA Subject: Application for Site Plan Special Permit Table of Contents (15 July 2003)................................................................... Attachment 1 Application for Site Plan Special Permit ........................................................ Attachment 2 Memorandum (15 July 2003)-....................................................................... Attachment 3 Location Map (19 June 2003)........................................................................ Attachment 4 Proposed Scope of Work (15 July 2003) ....................................................... Attachment 5 Site Plan (15 July 2003)................................................................................ Attachment 6 Existing Site (09 July 2003)........................................................................... Attachment 7 Zoning Information Table (15 July 2003) ....................................................... Attachment 8 Letter from Rick Rice to North Andover Building Department (16 July 2003) Parking Requirements................................................................................... Attachment 9 Wetlands Notice of Intent— Excerpt (26 June 2003) (including Erosion and Sediment Control Narrative) .................................... Attachment 10 Stormwater Management Report— Excerpt (26 June 2003)......................... Attachment 11 Site Soils and Geotechnical Information — Excerpt (20 June 2003) .............. Attachment 12 Traffic Impact Study (02 June 2003)............................................................ Attachment 13 Supplemental Traffic Impact Study (26 June 2003)...................................... Attachment 14 Traffic Impact Study Appendix— Excerpt (June 2003).................................. Attachment 15 Kenneth DiNisco Richard N. Rice Gary F. Ainslie Christopher Huston Donna DiNisco 87 Su m me r S t r e e t B o s ton MA 02 11 6 61 7 426 . 2858 f a x 426 . '1 457 W tY t1' d l n i 5 c o c o m I Attachment 1 —Table of Contents— Foster Farm Elementary School Page 2 Site Lighting Fixture Cuts............................................................................ Attachment 16 Letter from Eric Johnson, Massachusetts Historical Commission to Bridgett Nowd, Schofield Brothers of New England (21 January 2003) ........ Attachment 17 North Andover Public Schools Study for New 1-5 School - Excerpt (08 January 1998)................................ Attachment 18 Foster Farm School Site Feasibility Study— Excerpt (10 June 2002) ........... Attachment 19 Certified Abutters List (02 November 2000)................................................. Attachment 20 LARGE FORMAT ATTACHMENTS Plan Set (15 July 2003)............................................................................. Attachment LF1 T-1 Title Sheet SITE 1.0.1 Site Survey—Overview 1.0.2 Site Survey— South 1.0.3 Site Survey— North 1.0.4 Site Survey— Boxford Street Roadway Detail 1.0.5 Plan of Land 1.1.1 Not Used 1.1.2 Not Used 1.1.3 Not Used 1.1.4 Site Plan Overview 1.1.5 Layout& Materials Plan South 1.1.6 Layout & Materials Plan North 1.1.7 Grading Plan South I A.8 Grading Plan North 1.1.9 Planting Plan South 1.1.10 Planting Plan North 1.1.11 Site Details 1.1.12 Site Details 1.1.13 Boxford Street Sidewalk— Site Plan 1.2.0 Site Utilities, Legend, Details and General Notes 1.2.1 Site Utilities Plan South 1.2.2 Site Utilities Plan North 1.2.3 Not Used 1.2.4 Boxford Street Sewer Extension — Details 1.2.5 Boxford Street Sewer Extension — Part 1 Plan and Profile 1.2.0 Boxford Street Sewer Extension — Part 2 Plan and Profile 1.2.7 Boxford Street Sewer Extension — Part 3 Plan and Profile 1.2.8 Boxford Street Sewer Extension — Part 4 Plan and Profile I Attachment 1 --Table of Contents — Foster Farm Elementary School Page 3 1,3.1 Sediment and Erosion Control — South 1.3.2 Sediment and Erosion Control -- North 1.3.3 Sediment and Erosion Control Details 1.3.4 Stormwater Drainage Plan— South 1.3.5 Stormwater Drainage Plan — North 1.3.6 Stormwater Drainage Details 1.3.7 Stormwater Drainage Details ARCHITECTURAL. 3.3.1 Key Plans -- Basement and First Floor 3.3.2 Key Plans— Second Floor and Roof 3.6.1 Elevations ELECTRICAL 10.1.1 Site Electrical Plan 10.1.2 Site Electrical Plan Details 10.1.3 Site Lighting Plan and Details 10.1.4 Site Lighting Plan Calculations 02458.0 AlnBrdTOO i I n) Outdoor S) Traffic Impact Study Storage/Display Area t) Commonwealth Review 0) Landscaping Plan U) Utilities P) Refuse Areas V) Fiscal Impact 4) Lighting Facilities W) Community Impact r) Drainage Basin Study 7• The applicant will send the legal notice to the newspaper. The Planning Office will notify the abutters. See Section 8.3 of the North Andover zoning Bylaw for more detailed information Town of North Andover Planning Board Application for Site Plan Special Permit Please type or print clearly: 1. Petitioner: DiNisco Design Partnership, Ltd, Address: 87 Summer Street, Boston MA 02110 Telephone Number: 617 426-2858 2. Owners of the Land: North Andover School Department Address: 675 Chickering Road North Andover MA 01845 Telephone Number: (978) 794-1503 Number of years ownership: 5 If applicant is not the owner, please state interest in property: Architect 3. Request for a Special Permit under Section 8.3-2.a.i of the North Andover Zoning Bylaw to construct a new building of more than 2,000 SF and to increase the parking more than five additional spaces. 4. Location of Property: Boxford Street, North Andover MA 01845 Zoning District: Residential 1 Assessors: Map: 104E Lot #_38, 42, 43, 44, 45 Registry of Deeds: Book #: 1985 Page #_213, 215, 217, 218 5. Existing Lot: Lot Area (Sq. Ft): 1,239,456 SF Building Height: NIA Street Frontage;Box ford: 1,130 FT,Foster: 29 FfSide Setbacks: NIA Font Setback: NIA Rear Setback: N/A Floor Area Ration: NIA Lot Coverage: NIA 6. Proposed Lot(if applicable): Lot Area (Sq.Ft.): 1,239,456 SF Building Height: 65 FT(SECT 7.4.4) Street Frontage:Boxford: 1,130 FT,Foster: 29 FrSide Setback: 74 FT Front Setback: 199 FT Rear Setback: 196 FT Floor Area Ratio: 0.10:1 Lot Coverage: 6% 7. Required Lot(as required by Zoning Bylaw); Lot Area (Sq.Ft.): 87,120 SF Building Height: 35 Street Frontage: 175 FT Side Setback: 30 Front Setback: 30 FT Rear Setback: 30 Floor Area Ratio: NIA Lot Coverage: NIA 8. Existing Building (if applicable): Ground Floor (Sq.Ft,) NIA # of Floors NIA Total Sq. Ft.; NIA Height: NIA Use: N/A Type of Construction: N/A 9. Proposed Building: NIA Ground Floor (Sq.Ft.) 69,852 SF # of Floors 2 (+ basement) Total Sq. Ft,; _129,108 SF Height: 39 FT Use: Educational Type of Construction: 2C 10. Has there been a previous application for a Special Permit from the Planning Board on these premises? No If so, when and for what type of construction? It. Petitioner and Landowner signature(s): Every application for a Special Permit shall be made on this form which is the official form of the Planning Board. Every application shall be filed with the Town Clerk's Office. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to furnish all supporting documentation with this application. The dated copy of this application received by the Town Clerk or Planning Office does not absolve the applicant from this responsibility. The petitioner shall be I I i responsible for all expenses for filing and legal notification. Failure to comply with application requirements, as cited herein and in the Planning Board Rules and Regulations may result in a dismissal by the Planning Board of this application as inco plete. Petitioner s Signature: Print or type name here: Richard Rice Vice President iNisco D ign Partnership, Ltd. Owner s Signature: re" 04 Print or type name here: Paul Szymanski, Director Management Services North Andover School Department PROJECT REVIEW FEES Preliminary plan, modification of a Preliminary Plan, Modification of a Definitive Plan, or Modification of a Special Permit shall require the following initial Project Review Fee: Project Size Fee 2-15 lots/Units $2,000 16-20 lots/units $3,000 21-25 lots/units $4,250 More than 25 lots/units $5,000 Definitive Plan shall require the following initial Project Review Fee: Project Size Fee 2-15 lots/units $4,000 16-20 lots/units $6,000 21-25 lots/units $10,000 More than 25 lots/units $12,000 Special Permit shall require the following initial Project Review Fees: Project Size Fee Less than 10,000 square feet $2,000 ATTACHMENT 3 MEMORANDUM 16 July 2003 Reference: Foster Farm Elementary School North Andover, MA Subject: Application for Site Plan Special Permit This Memorandum sets forth the facts relied upon in this application as requested in the instructions. The specific points the instructions have identified to be addressed are referenced below and numbered in accordance with Section 6 of the submission instructions. 6.a NORTH ARROW / LOCATION MAP See Attachment 4. 6.b SURVEY OF THE LOT/ PARCEL See Site Survey, sheets, 1.01 -- 1.0.4 of Attachment LF1; Plan of Land, sheet 1.05 of Attachment LF1; and Existing Site, Attachment 7. 6.c NAME / DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT Foster Farm Elementary School The North Andover School Building Committee proposes to construct a new elementary school on the site known as Foster Farm, which consists of "a mosaic of open fields, wetlands and oak-pine woodland distributed across a rolling landscape of small hills and depressions. The property is also crossed along its northern tier by a waterbody known as Mosquito Brook."The Foster Farm property has been divided into five different parcels.'The school site is located on the parcel identified as Lot A in the Plan of Land, Attachment LF1 and is 28.5 acres. The North Andover Conservation Commission holds Lot B which is immediately to the east of the school site and is 36.9 acres (Foster Farm Resource Management Plan, 26 March 1999). Construction is just being completed on the Foster Farm Fields Soccer Complex which also occupies a portion of Lot A. The school building has been sited to occupy a 6 acre upland plateau portion of the property that is surrounded by wetlands, a vernal pool habitat and Mosquito Brook. An existing walking trail connects the soccer fields to the school site. The building site is relatively free of trees. Most of the mature trees are being preserved and integrated into the design for the approach, drop-off, parking and play areas. The new elementary school is designed for 850 students from pre-kindergarten through grade 5 and 100 staff. The plans propose a two story plus basement, steel frame structure of 129,000 square feet. The facility will include 40 general classrooms, special education, art, music and science classrooms, a cafeteria, kitchen, instructional media center (library), gymnasium and multipurpose room with stage platform and a seating capacity of 400. I i Memorandum, North Andover Planning Board, 16 July 2003 Page 2 Proposed construction activities include earthwork cut and fill to create a flat area accommodating the building, stockpiling fill and loam during construction, and construction of the new elementary school and site improvements, Proposed site improvements include a driveway system E providing 360-degree access around the school, 185 parking spaces (116 spaces plus 79 parallel parking spaces along the drive), stormwater management system, play areas and landscaping. This project has also been awarded a Massachusetts Green School Initiative grant for designing a high performance, resource and energy efficient green school. Green design components include a solar photovoltaic system mounted on the roof; re-use of rainwater for irrigation and a demonstration project of re-using rainwater for flushing water closets and urinals; increased energy efficiency for HVAC, lighting and electrical systems, and planted rock filters to improve the quality of stormwater runoff from parking lots and driveways. Related off-site work for this project includes a 3,800 foot extension of the Boxford Street sewer line from the intersection of Huckleberry Lane and Boxford Street to the school site; an extension of the Foster Street water line to the school site and looping it to the Boxford Street water main; and a sidewalk along Boxford Street from the Foster Street/Salem Street/ Boxford Street intersection to the school site. It is anticipated that construction on this project will not start until 2007—2010 time period because of conditions put on town funding for the Foster Farm Elementary School at the May 2003 Town Meeting. Accordingly the project will be submitted to the Department of Education (DOE) in August 2003 as a "deferred construction" reimbursement project, that is construction must begin once the Town of North Andover receives notice from DOE that reimbursement payments are about to begin. Because there is a limited time frame to complete the project construction documents and submit required local project approvals to DOE once the Town receives the reimbursement notice from DOE, the School Building Committee is submitting this project for approval by the Planning Board at this time. By so doing it is hoped that any future resubmission to the Planning Board due to the delay in constructing the project can be accomplished in an expedited manner so as not to jeopardize the state reimbursement needed to construct the school. 6.d EASEMENTS / LEGAL CONDITIONS None. 6.e TOPOGRAPHY The present topography of the site is described in the project description above and documented in the Site Survey, sheets 1,01 — 1.04 of Attachment LF1. The proposed topography will cut down the hill at the location to be occupied by the building to increase the flat area available for the building and immediately adjacent play areas. The existing high point of 165 feet will be taken down to the building's ground floor elevation of 154 feet and 151 feet. Additional grading adjustments are proposed for the site drive, parking and stormwater drainage. All earthwork is incidental to the construction of the new school project. The proposed topography is shown on the Grading Plan, sheets 1.1.7--1.1.8 of Attachment LF1. 6.f ZONING INFORMATION The project site is located in the (R-1) Residential District 1. See Zoning Information Table, Attachment 8. Memorandum, North Andover Planning Board, 16 July 2003 Page 3 6.g STORMWATER DRAINAGE PLAN See the following: Sediment and Erosion Control, sheets 1.3.1 — 1.3.3 of Attachment LF1 Stormwater Drainage Plan, sheets 1.3.4 — 1.3.7 of Attachment LF1 Stormwater Management Report, Attachment 11 Erosion and Sediment Control Narrative, Attachment 10. Calculations for 1, 2, 10 and 100 year storm events are included. 6.h BUILDINGS LOCATION See the project description above, Site Plan Overview, 1.1.4, Layout and Materials Plan 1.1.5- 1.1.6, and Key Plans, 3.3.1 —3.3.2 of Attachment LF1. 6.i BUILDING ELEVATION See Elevations, 3.6.1 of Attachment LF1, 6.j LOCATION OF PARKING I WALKWAYS See Layout & Materials Plan, 1A.5— 1.1.6 of Attachment LF1 for the proposed parking and walkways. See Proposed Scope of Work, Attachment 5, for the existing parking at the Soccer Fields Complex and the proposed Boxford Street Sidewalk and Boxford Street Sidewalk Site Plan, 1.1.13 of Attachment LF1. A waiver for complete design, engineering and documentation of the Boxford Street Sidewalk is requested at this time due to the length of time until this project will be constructed. 6.k LOCATION OF WETLANDS / NOTICE OF INTENT The Site Survey, 1.01-1.04 of Attachment LF1 and Attachment 7, Existing Site show the location of the Wetlands, Riverfront Area, Vernal Pool and buffer zones. See the Notice of Intent, Attachment 10. The first hearing on the Notice of Intent was held 09 July 2003. The hearing is continued to 30 July 2003. 6.1 LOCATION OF WALLS / SIGNS The sections of existing stone walls where the school and drive are located will be removed. Other sections of the stone wall that run along a trail through the site will remain. The removed stone wall will be used for two four foot high retaining walls to the east of the school and around the play area that is adjacent to the north end of the school. See the Site Survey, 1.01-1.0.3, and Grading Plan, Layout and Materials Plan, 1.1.5-1.1.6 of Attachment LF1. A ground sign is proposed at the site entry to the school. The sign will be no larger than ten square feet. See Site Layout and Material Plan, 1.1.5 of Attachment LF1 for the proposed location and 1.1.11 for a detail of the ground sign. A wall sign will be located on the south elevation of the school, to be seen as the school is approached from the site drive. 6.m LOCATION OF ROADWAYS See Site Survey, sheets 1.0.1 — 1.0.4 of Attachment LF1 for the location of adjacent roadways and curb cuts. See Layout and Materials, sheets 1.1.5— 1.1.6, 1.1.11 — 1.1.12 of Attachment LF1 for site drive layout and details. Memorandum, North Andover Planning Board, 16 July 2003 Page 4 6.n OUTDOOR STORAGE / DISPLAY AREAS There are no outdoor storage or display areas on the site. Storage for site related equipment is contained in the building. 6.o LANDSCAPING PLAN See Planting Plan, 1.1.9— 1.1.10, Layout and Materials, 1.1.5— 1.1.6 and Site Details 1.1.11 — 1.1.12 of Attachment LF1. 6.p REFUSE AREAS See Layout and Materials, sheet 1.1.5 for the location of the outdoor refuse storage area (dumpster) with enclosure. 6.q LIGHTING FACILITIES See the following documents: Site Lighting Plan and Details, 10.1.3 of Attachment LF1 Site Lighting Plan Calculations, 10.1.4 of Attachment LF1 Site Light Fixture Cuts, Attachment 16 6.r DRAINAGE BASIN STUDY See Stormwater Management Report, Attachment 11. 6.s TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY See Traffic Impact Study, Attachment 13; Supplemental Traffic Impact Study, Attachment 14; and Traffic Impact Study Appendix, Attachment 15, 6,t COMMONWEALTH REVIEW The following Commonwealth agencies have been sent documentation on this project for their review: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) —The Notice of Intent was sent to the DEP 26 June 2003, See Attachment 14. Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC) —The MHC has reviewed the proposed project and determined that there are no historic or archaeological properties within its confines. See Attachment 17. 6.0 UTILITES See Site Utilities, 1.2.0 — 1.2.2; Sediment and Erosion Control, 1.3.1 — 1.3.3; and Stormwater Drainage, 1.3.4— 1.37 of Attachment LF1. See the following documentation for related off-site utilities work discussed above in the project description: Proposed Scope of Work, Attachment 5. Boxford Street Sewer Extension, 1.2.4-- 1.2.8 of Attachment LF1. Foster Street Water Line Extension, 1.2.2 of Attachment LF1. A waiver for complete design, engineering and documentation of the Boxford Street Sewer Extension is requested at this time due to the length of time until this project will be constructed. Memorandum, North Andover Planning Board, 16 July 2003 Page 5 6.v FISCAL IMPACT The new elementary school is a town project that was approved for funding at Town Meeting (Article 14) on 12 May 2003. 6.w COMMUNITY IMPACT Architecturally the new elementary school has been designed to ensure that the natural resources and scenic vistas of Foster Farm are preserved to the maximum extent possible. Breaking down the massing of the building along with the use of pitched roofs wl large overhangs, pergolas and trellises and the hiding of rooftop mechanical units are used to help bring down the scale of the building and reduce its visual impact in this rural setting. The proposed site plan is consistent with the existing trail system and its further development to connect nearby open spaces as discussed in two town documents: Foster Farm Resource Management Plan (FFRMP) by the Conservation Department, 26 March 1999 and the Open Space and Recreation Plan 2000 (OSRP), Fall 2000 by the Conservation Department and North Andover Open Space Committee. The existing trail that runs through the site will be relocated around the north end of the school and will be resurfaced with crushed stone and stone dust. Existing barbed wire will be removed as recommended in FFRMP. The school site will also provide public access and parking for recreational use of Foster Farm that is identified as one of the most important management issues for this open space. The Foster Farm site will be an educational asset for the school to use in its science curriculum with the ability to study subjects including biology, ecology and geology. In addition the school building itself will be an educational tool. Part of the Green Schools grant discussed above will be used for developing a curriculum to promote energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy technologies. And as a high performance green school it will showcase to the broader community the advantages of using innovative technologies, design and product choices. An additional benefit to North Andover is the community use of school facilities including the multipurpose room, cafeteria, athletic facilities and library. The related off-site work for the Boxford Street Sewer Extension, Boxford Street Sidewalk, and Foster Street Water line extension will also be of benefit improving the infrastructure of the neighborhood. The conclusion to build a new school on this site is based on a planning process that evaluated several different sites for locating a new elementary school to serve North Andover's growing school enrollment. A study prepared for the North Andover School Department in 1998, Attachment 18, looked at three different sites including Foster Farm. Subsequently the School Facilities Master Planning Committee recommended the Foster Farm site and at the May 1998 Town Meeting the purchase of the site for school and conservation use was approved. At Town Meeting in May 2002, the citizens of North Andover approved the funding of the design phase for this project. A feasibility study, Attachment 19 was prepared in June 2002 to further study the Foster Farm site. Finally as discussed above funding for construction was approved at Town Meeting in May of this year. 02456.0 PnBtdMemorandum PORFST STATE f �« - R / r is ` I ...IIIJJJ - .ST. �,�n '1'� -�,�Cj4,}ll �.l\ ._ � .! �� �� �s• ,��.-_ _4�.._ �`y� 1r_-+.. ' I rM It 06 CD sr : s Gravel' � I Q` k1A tO PARKER+ .� • r �. ,n S TF.FOREST 1. �\ \Y J ' Fri:g 1 1r, A S L q ll.. AAi�rk� 4 •PO � c �r� oRes� � + VP �idam L O OM37.6 r 1\ A N 0 25,000 Location Map 19 ,June Zoos Foster Farm Elementary School �;,J� - • North Andover MA Limited' a r c h i t e c t s and p 1 a n n e r S Attachment 8 Foster Farm Elementary School Zoning Information Town of North Andover Planning Board 15 July 2003 Required(Note 1) Existing New Minimum Lot Area 87,120 SF 1,239,456 SF 1,239,456 SF Maximum Height(Note 2) 65 FT NIA 39 FT Minimum Street Frontage 175 FT Boxford 1,130 FT Boxford 1,130 FT Foster 29 FT Foster 29 FT Minimum Front Set-Back 30 FT 199 FT Minimum Side Set-Back 30 FT NIA 74 FT Minimum Rear Set-Back 30 FT NIA 196 FT Building Ground Floor Gross Area N/A WA 69,852 SF Building Total Gross Area NIA NIA 129,108 SF Maximum Floor Area Ration NIA NIA 0,10:1 Maximum Lot Coverage NIA N/A 6% Maximum Dwelling Unit NIA WA NIA Density/Acre Use Municipal/Undeveloped Municipal&Educational Open Space NIA N/A N/A Parking Spaces (Note 3) 90(Soccer Fields) 116 (3 Lots) 30 (Access Drive) 49 (Drop off Drive - Nighttime Use) Signs 30 Soccer Fields Ground Sign One Sign Per Street Access Ground Sign of 10 SF Maximum 10 SF Wall Signs. 10% of Elevation N/A Wall Sin on South Elevation of School Landscaping By Planning Hoard Review See Planting List&Plans 1.1.9 1.1.10 Attachment L.F-1 Notes 1 Zoning requirements of(R-1) Residential District. 2 Building height of 65 FT allowed from Section 7,4,4 of Zoning Bylaw. 3 Parking Requirements determined by Building Inspector because schools are not a listed use in the North Andover Zoning By-law, See Attachment 9. j 4" D"4, architects and planners Limsted VIA FASCIMILE 16 July 2003 Town of North Andover Building Department 27 Charles Street North Andover, MA 01845 Attention: Robert Nicetta, Building Commissioner Re: Foster Farm Elementary School North Andover, MA Subject: Parking Requirements - Revised Dear Bob: The purpose of this letter is to describe the parking proposed for the Foster Farm school project. As we have discussed, schools are not a listed use in the North Andover Zoning By-law, and the Building Inspector shall make a determination as to a sufficient quantity of parking, per the by-law. NEW FOSTER FARM The new school is being designed to accommodate 850 students PreK-Grade 5. Parking during the school day will include a total of 116 spaces in three lots, plus 30 parallel parking spaces along the outside of the access drive (with the inside curb kept clear for a fire lane). For nighttime use of the building, another 49 parallel parking spaces are provided along the outside of the parent's drop off drive on the west, north, and east sides of the building (again, keeping the inside fire lane clear), for a total of 185 spaces. In addition, another 90 parking spaces currently exist at the adjacent soccer fields. While additional parking may be advantageous for the largest public usage of the building, the site simply cannot support additional parking for such an infrequent event given wetlands constraints, the desire to save as many mature trees as possible and the need to maximize open space for playfields. Kenneth DiNisco Richard N. Rice Gary E. AinsIie Christopher Huston Donna DiNisco 8 7 S u m m e r S t r e e t B y 5; t o n M A 0 2 1 1 0 6 1 7 4 2 6 . 2 8 5 8 F a x 4 2-6 .-1-4 5 7 w %vw . di nisco . com Robert Nice tta, 16 July 2003 page 2 MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECT By means of comparison, the 1200 student middle school project included a total of 191 spaces in three lots, plus 43 parallel parking spaces along the outside curb of the access drive, for a total of 234 spaces. At recent visits to the middle school during the school day, more than 100 spaces in the most remote portions of the parking lots were observed to be unused. Should you have any comments or questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me, rel richard Rice DiNISCO DESIGN cc: Louis Minicucci Nancy Kurtz Paul Szymanski Pat Saitta 02458.0 CarBui}ding Dept 02 _ I �.J 21652 NOTICE OF INTENT y'� 1 FOSTER FARM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for: DiNisco Design,Partnership 87 Summer Street Boston,MA 02138 Prepared by: Schofield Brothers of New England, Inc. 1071 Worcester Road Framingham,NIA 01701 June 26,2003 oL--D`SCHOFIELD BROTHERS FNGINEERI`c • sURVEY]NG • P1,AN'NINc i i c'SCHOFIELD BROTHERS f:\t;l\EE:NI\I: • til Hlf:l!\G pl, 21652 NOTICE OF INTENT TABLE OF CONTENTS FOSTER FARM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Boxford Road North Andover, Massachusetts Project Narrative and Summary WPA Form 3 —Notice of Intent Form Local Waiver Request Form Application Checklist Form Certified List of Abutters Abutter Notification Affidavit of Service Appendix C - Stormwater Management Form North Andover Stormwater Form Attachments & Calculations Attachment 1 —Locus Map Attachment 2 --Natural Heritage Maps (2000-2001) Attachment 3 — Order of Resource Area Delineation (issued 7/11/02) Attachment 4 —Erosion and Sediment Control Narrative Attachment 5 — Stormwater Management Report Attachment 6 — Site Soils and Geotechnical Information Site Plans 1.0.1 Site Survey—Overview 1.2.0 Site Utilities, Legend &Details 1.0.2 Site Survey—South 1.11 Site Utilities, Plan Part I Plan 1.03 Site Survey—North 1.2.2 Site Utilities, Plan Part 2 Plan LIA Site Plan Overview 1.3.1 Sediment & Erosion Control - South 1.1.5 Layout & Materials Plan South 1.3.2 Sediment & Erosion Control - North 1.1.6 Layout & Materials Plan North 1.3.3 Sediment & Erosion Control - Detail 1.1.7 Grading Plan South 1.3.4 Ston-nwater Drainage Plan - South 1.1.8 Grading Plan North 1.3.5 Stormwater Drainage Plan - North L 1.9 Planting Plan South 1.3,6 Stormwater Drainage - Details 1.1.10 Planting Plan North Architectural Plan 3.3.1 Key Plans —Basement and First Floor i 'E�--YESCHOFIELD BROTHERS ENGINKE;R1\G St.RlrEs ri.,,"i\c Project Narrative and Summary Notice of Intent Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act Foster Farm Elementary School North Andover, Massachusetts Site Description This publicly owned site, located between Foster Street and Boxford Street in North Andover, Massachusetts, is part of the Foster Farm property. It is approximately 77 acres in size and is identified as Parcel Number 38, Map 104D on the North Andover Assessor's maps. The property abuts residential areas to the north and south and town- owned land to the east and west. Within the site there is a cart path and some stone walls and fencing. The majority of the parcel consists of upland open fields with wetland resource areas occupying the lower elevation areas (see Site Plans). The proposed site for the school is a peninsula of land extending northerly from Boxford Road with various wetland resource areas on to the west, north and east sides. The entire site is within the Mosquito Brook watershed. All the wetland resource areas are shown on the site plans. The site's wetland delineation was performed by Wetland Preservation, Inc. in May of 2002, and the wetland resource areas and buffer zones shown on the plans are as formally determined tinder an Abbreviated Notice of Resource Area Delineation (DEP File No.242-1146). The Order of Resource Area Delineation was issued by the North Andover Conservation Commission on July 11, 2002. A copy is attached as Attachment 3. The above filing includes a Wetland Delineation Report that contains detailed information on the wetland resource areas. In the westerly portion of the site, there is a Certified Vernal Pool with associated Bordering Vegetated Wetlands (BVW). An intermittent stream flows north out of the vernal pool wetland and joins other intermittent streams and wetlands that divide this site from the residential properties and Foster Street to the north. The vernal pool wetland and the intermittent stream separate the proposed school site from the soccer field complex that is cun-ently being constructed in the western portion of the site. The school site and soccer field complex are connected by a small cart road that crosses the intermittent stream. The westerly and northerly located wetland areas drain to the west into Mosquito Brook, which is located on the adjacent Conservation Land, approximately 160 feet northwest of the school property. Mosquito Brook is a perennial stream and is a River under the Mass. Rivers Protection Act, The Riverfront Area adjacent to Mosquito Brook extends into the school project site. The wetlands bordering on Mosquito Brook to the east are extensive. �SCHOFIFI.D BROTHERS E\f;l\EERI\�• �f N5 F:51�1; !'l.�\\1\�; The cart road mentioned above continues to the east and crosses the easterly wetlands to the uplands on the Conservation Land to the East. Mosquito Brook is also subject to periodic flooding. The limit of the Bordering Land Subject to Flooding (BLSF) is off the project site and is identified as the 124.5 contour elevation. i Proposed Project The proposed work at the subject site involves the construction of an 800-student, 100- staff elementary school (Kindergarten through the 5th grade), with associated utilities, landscaping, patio, parking and driveway. The Town of North Andover has purchased 77 acres between Foster and Boxford Street, which includes "conservation land" and the site for an elementary school. A feasibility study for suitably siting a new 800-student elementary school was completed by Moriece & Gary Landscape Architects. In February 2002, after eighteen months of study, the School Facilities Master Planning Committee delivered their final report to the School Committee, recommending the construction of an elementary school at Foster Farm. At Town Meeting, in May 2002, the citizens of North Andover approved the funding of the design phase of this project. The architectural firm of DiNisco Design Partnership along with their team of consultant engineers was retained to design the new Foster Farm Elementary School. The school design for 800 students from Kindergarten through the 5th grades and 100 staff is currently in the design phase. The program includes space for 37 general classrooms as well as special education, art, music, and science classrooms, a cafeteria & kitchen, a multipurpose room with stage platform, and a gymnasium. Current plans propose a two- story steel frame structure with a 72,000 square footprint and 120,000 gross square feet of floor area on a 6-acre portion of the 77-acre Foster Farm site. On-site parking facilities include striped parking spaces for 116 cars plus additional parallel parking along the loop road that circles the school Proposed work also involves the installation of an 8-inch water main that will run northwest from the school to connect with an existing water main located on Foster Street. A large portion of the water main is proposed to be installed beneath the existing cart path. Performance Standards Bordering Vegetated Wetlands. 310 CMR 10.55 (4) No work is proposed which would destroy or alter the bordering vegetated wetlands (BVW) within the site. Some work is proposed to an existing cart path that crosses the intermittent stream; the work is confined to the cart path only, however. To ensure the integrity of downgradient BVW's, erosion and sedimentation controls will be installed prior to the start of work and will remain until all disturbed areas have stabilized. - 100-Foot Wetland Buffer Zone Approximately 53,098 S.F. of work is proposed to occur within the 100-Foot Wetland Buffer Zone. The majority of the proposed work is surface grading, driveway 'E77_7=SCIIQF1ELD BROTHERS RING • Sl H% F.11\G - H.a\\I\G construction and stormwater outfalls. Post-construction, most of the graded areas outside of the driveways will be returned to their native meadow vegetation. The northerly meadow will contain a stormwater management basin that is designed to also be used as an informal play field and will be mowed. The remainder of the work within the Buffer Zone includes the installation of an 8" water main that will connect from the school to Foster Street, and also the surface improvements to the existing cart path (see Site Plan for location). The water main will be installed beneath a previously altered area, including the cart path. Post-installation the inner six feet of the cart path will be re-surfaced with crushed stone and stone dust to improve the path's walking surface. There does not appear to be a formal culvert at the cart road crossing; the stream drains under the road through stones. The project includes repairing the existing stone with a new composition of stones to maintain the existing hydraulic characteristics. Erosion and sedimentation controls will be installed prior to the start of work and will remain until all disturbed areas have stabilized. The stormwater management system for the project has been designed to meet the Mass Stormwater Management policies. North Andover Wetland Bylaw 50-Foot "No Build Zone" The proposed building is completely outside of the 50-Foot No Build Zone. The project therefore meets the requirements of this zone. North Andover Wetland Bylaw 25-Foot "No Disturbance Zone" Approximately 910 S.F, of work is proposed to occur within the North Andover 25-Foot No Disturbance Zone. The proposed work involves the water main installation and the subsequent surface improvements to the cart path. All of the proposed work is within a previously altered area and will not result in an increase of water flow to the adjacent BVW. Erosion and sedimentation controls will be installed prior to the start of work and will remain until the disturbed area has stabilized. North Andover Vernal Pool 50-Foot "No Disturb Zone" No work is proposed to occur within the North Andover Vernal Pool 50-Foot "No Disturb Zone". North Andover Vernal Pool 75-Foot "No Build Zone" The proposed building is completely outside of the 75-Foot No Build Zone. The project therefore meets the requirements of this zone. Riverfront: 310 CMR 10.58 (4) T[,; total Riverfront Area (RA) on site is 78,569 S.F. Approximately 6,443 S.F. of work is proposed to occur within the 200-foot River-front Area (RA), all of which is located in the outer 100 feet of the RA. The work consists of regrading at the side of the proposed driveway, and the reconstruction of a short portion of the footpath. This grading avoids i I SESCHOFIELD BROTURS F\GINEERING • tit R%F 11I1,G the need to construct a retaining wall, which would be the alternative to the regrading proposed. The regraded areas will be returned to their existing condition by replanting the meadow and replacing the existing field stone wall and cart path. The work also includes a stormwater outfall. The total amount of work is $.2% of the RA, which meets the requirements of less than 10%. Erosion and sedimentation controls will be installed prior to the start of work and will remain until all disturbed areas have stabilized. Land Subject to Flooding No work is proposed to occur within the 100-year flood elevation (124.5 feet) or the 500- year flood elevation (125.5 feet). These areas are off site to the northeast. Stormwater Management The project has been designed to fully comply with the DEP and North Andover Stormwater Management Policy. A complete description and information is contained in Attachment 5. Estimated Habitat of State Listed Rare Wetland Wildlife A copy of the most recent Natural Heritage Atlas is contained in Attachment 2. According to that map, there are no areas within the site that contain protected species or habitat. The nearest Estimated Habitat is located approximately one-half mile east of the site. Historic and Archaeological Assets The Massachusetts Historical Commission reviewed the project site and it was determined that there are no historic or archaeological properties within its' confines. Q r � � l!F-1 r•� 21652 _ ' ATTACHMENT EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE FOR THE PROPOSED FOSTER FARM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for: DiNisco Design Partnership, 87 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Prepared by: Schofield Brothers of New England, Inc. 1071 Worcester Road Framingham, MA 01701 June 26, 2003 =---�SCHOEI ELD BROTHERS F:ti(,1NEFR[ SCHOFIELD BROTHERS k;�f;l\k.F.RI`G Sk RI F.511, P1.kN p,t; 2 L652 ^� ---- NARRATIVE R SLI-IMARY EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN FOSTER FARM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL To protect the wetland resource areas and down-gradient drainage and infrastructure during the proposed site work, sediment control barriers and sediment traps will be installed prior to the start of work and will be maintained until all disturbed areas have been permanently stabilized. The planned site work will be very complex and schedule of work cannot be completely planned in advance. It is, therefore, important that the plans for erosion and sediment controls be flexible to allow the contractor to react to changing site conditions so that the performance standards of controlling erosion and sediment are met. The installation of erosion and sediment controls shown on the plans will set the site up for the site work for each of the two phases of construction. As the work proceeds, the control installations and the site in general must be monitored to assure that the installations are properly maintained and are performing as required. If the systems are not performing as necessary, or if changing site conditions dictate changes to the system, necessary adjustments to the installations must be made. The general "Performance Standard" for erosion and sediment controls shall be that: "The Contractor shall install, routinely inspect and maintain all sediment and erosion controls such that they are in proper working order at all times, Further, the Contractor shall manage the site such that erosion and sediment from runoff and wind blown dust are controlled and minimized at all times. This includes minitnizing areas of exposed soils, installing temporary cover, making necessary adjustments in the erosion control installations, and installing additional erosion control devices as may be necessary to meet this requirement. All erosion controls shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the U.S.D.A. Natural Resource Conservation Service Guidelines." The systems to be installed initially as shown on the plan include the following Erosion Control - Best Management Practices (BMPs): - Silt Fence Barriers and Haybale & Silt Fence Barriers. - Temporary Sediment Basins - Haybale & Silt Fence Check Dams - Storm Drain Inlet Protection i I > i L-SCI�OFI LD 1il1()THEE`� IRiNS. St R�} I,,(, Eli.�\\I\i, Foster Farm Elementary School--Erosion and Sediment Control Pace A3 -2 The following are examples of other sediment and erosion controls that may be necessary in addition to the above to meet the "Performance Standards": - Temporary Diversion Swales— to direct runoff away from unstable areas. Temporary Hydro-Seeding— to provide vegetative cover for areas that may not need to be disturbed for extended periods during construction, Mulching -Temporary straw, wood chip, or other mulch to protect exposed slopes. Straw Bale and Fabric Bins — Used to discharge pump discharges from excavation de-watering. Filter Berms — Used to collect and filter runoff from large exposed areas where a sediment basin can not be constructed. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE The site contractor shall inspect all erosion control installations at least weekly and following each rainfall exceeding '/a inch of precipitation. Repairs and maintenance shall be shall be performed immediately. The following describes the inspection, routine maintenance and non-routine maintenance, which are required for each BMP. For maintenance and inspection requirements for BMPs not listed specifically, refer to U.S.D.A. Natural Resource Conservation Service Guidelines. HAYBALE & SILT FENCE BARRIERS AND CHECK DAMS Inspect to see that the silt fence is properly anchored into the ground, that there are no breaks in the fence material, the material has no sags and the fence is upright. Check to ID see that the accumulated sediment is less than 12 inches. Inspect haybales to check for condition and that they are properly staked and tight together. Maintenance includes removal of accumulated sediment if greater than 12 inches in depth and making necessary repairs to the silt fence. Haybales that are rotted or otherwise degraded such that they can not function properly shall be replaced. Small gaps in the haybales can be chinked with loose straw. Maintenance and inspections of haybale dikes and stormwater inlet protection installations are the same as above. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN Inspect the basin for the following: - Accumulated sediment must be less than 1/4`t' of the basin volume. - Check the condition of the berm (dike) for erosion and general condition. S-.S(: 10FIELD BROTHUS I.kl Foster Farm Elementary School—Erosion and Sediment Control Pare A3 - 3 - Inspect the outlet structure for accumulated sediment at the stone filter and that it is draining freely. If ponded water remains for a significant time following a storm, the stone filter must be cleaned. 4 - Inspect the outlet pipe for condition and blockages. Maintenance includes removal of accumulated sediment, repairing the basin side-slopes and dike and cleaning of the stone filter. After removal of the sediment from the bottom of the basin, the stone filter can generally be cleaned with a high-pressure hose. The water forces sediment down and out of the stone and the filter fabric lining of the concrete structure keeps sediment from leaving the basin. TEMPORARY MULCHED AREAS Areas of exposed soil where no work is planned for an extended period of time (generally more than two weeks) should be teniporarily stabilized with straw mulch and jute netting, wood chips, or hydro-mulched with a tacifier. The mulch must be inspected regularly and repaired as necessary. STORIM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION To protect existing and newly constructed storm drain systems onsite, sediment control protection shall be provided. These include haybale and silt fence barriers installed around drain inlets to filter stormwater prior to entering the drains. Typical installation is shown on the plans. WATER A-IAIN INSTALLATION AT EXISTING CART PATH The installation of the water main will be in close proximity to wetland resource areas in the vicinity of the storm crossing. This will be a delicate construction procedure that will include dewatering of trench excavation, installation of special dewaterina discharge bins, and careful handling of excavated and installed earth materials. Special construction procedures are outlines for this work on the erosion and sediment control plans. WETLANDS PROTECTION ORDER OF CONDITIONS This project will be subject to an Order of Conditions issued under the Wetlands Protection Act and the North Andover Wetlands Protection Bylaw. In additions to the plans and construction specifications, the Order of Conditions will Generally contain special conditions relative to sediment and erosion control. The Contractor will comply with the requirements of the Order as part of the plans and specifications. EPA NPDES PERMIT The contractor wit be responsible for preparing a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) and filing a Notice of Intent with the EPA under the NPDES Phase II permit requirement. The plan is to be consistent with the erosion and sediment control plans prepared for the project and all requirements of the orders of condition issued by the North Andover Conservation Commission, Planning Board and permits by other applicable federal, state and local permitting agencies. i Wt 21652 ATTACHMENT S STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED FOSTER FARM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROTECT NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for: DiNisco Design Partnership. 87 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Prepared by: Schofield Brothers of New England, Inc, 1071 Worcester Road Frarningham, MA 01701= 4 FRED=W. KM No.�P083 06 �r r June 26,2003 o=SCHOFIELD BROTHERS ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING 21652 TABLE OF CONTENTS _ Pages Part 1 Narrative & Summary I-1 to 1-6 Part 2 -Stormwater Management Forms -Stormwater Management Policy Compliance Calculations -Best Management Practices Design Calculations 2-1 to 24Y Part 3 Existing Conditions Stormwater Runoff 3-1 to 3-64 and Flood Routing Computations Part 4 Proposed Conditions Stormwater Runoff, 4-1 to 4-169 and Flood Routing Computations APPENDICES Appendix I Stormwater Management System Operation and Maintenance Plan Al-I to A 1-7 Appendix 2 25 Year Peak Flows A2-1 to A2-22 To Catch Basin Inlets and Pipe Sizing Appendix 3 Existing Conditions -Watershed Map Appendix 4 Proposed Conditions - Watershed Map Note For soils Information, See Attachment 6 of the Wetlands Notice of Intent -' ,c^r.;�k.-�' £.�:.-.�_ '; �'���„ �:.ss,.,..it, �_•-,.- ,. ._,..-��.... � zr,.4n �.,}r, ^ ..i'Fr= .. "`.t�;.,-. t_,-.� _,.rr":��'c•��.. ..:'.,.... . ., ii PART 1 - NARRATIVE & SUMMARY This report contains the hydrologic computations and design information relative to the existing and proposed stormwater runoff conditions at the Proposed Broad Frost Farm -- _ ____.Elementary School Site on Boxford Road in North Andover..The report contains detailed information on the proposed stormwater management system design and assessment of stormwater impacts of the proposed project. EXISTING CONDITIONS This publicly owned site, located between Foster Street and Boxford Street in North Andover, Massachusetts, is part of the Foster Farm property. It is approximately 77 acres in size and is identified as Parcel Number 38, Map 104D on the North Andover Assessor's maps. The property abuts residential areas to the north and south and town- owned land to the east and west. The proposed site for the school is a peninsula of land extending northerly from Boxford Road with various wetland resource areas on to the west, north and east sides. The project site consists of about 14 acres of the larger property, The entire site is within the - Mosquito Brook watershed. All the wetland resource areas are shown on the site plans. 'Within the project site there is a cart path and some stone walls and fencing. The majority of the parcel consists of upland open fields with wetland resource areas occupying the lower elevation areas (see Site Plans). In the westerly portion of the project site, there is a Certified Vernal Pool with associated Bordering Vegetated Wetlands (BVW). An intermittent stream flows north out of the vernal pool wetland and joins other intermittent streams and wetlands that divide this site from the residential properties and Foster Street to the north. The vernal pool wetland and the intermittent stream separate the proposed school site-from-fro the soccer field - complex that is currently being constructed in the western portion of the site,- The school - site and soccer field complex are connected by a small cart road that crosses the intermittent stream. The westerly and northerly located wetland areas drain to the west into Mosquito Brook, which is located on the adjacent Conservation Land, approximately 160 feet northwest of the school property. Mosquito Brook is a perennial stream and is a River under the Mass. Rivers Protection Act. The Riverfront Area adjacent to Mosquito Brook extends into the school project site. The wetlands bordering on Mosquito Brook to the east are extensive. The cart road mentioned above continues 'to the east and crosses the easterly wetlands to - the uplands on the Conservation Land to the East --— - ---- Mosquito Brook is also subject to periodic.floodin_ g.'The limit of the Bordering Land Subject to"Flooding (BLSF) is off the project site and is identified as:the 124 5 contour ram. r �i.Y .,,4-�t :r ._ � t. . .. .,.- -a. t..,.T„ �t_. ., -_ -. 4• 1 ';. .. v. .mil;.sss 7i.�=Y4'�;7�2}'r..�f�LS�.'�_. _ i:E?� 21652 Foster Farm Elementary School Narrative&Summary Page 1-2 elevation. There are some flooding problems in some reaches of Mosquito Brook, and this issue is an important consideration for this project. The attached Existing Conditions Watershed Map (Appendix 3) shows the existing surface drainage patterns for the site and site features. The existing conditions project area has been divided into five_sub-watersheds. The southern_portion of the site along Boxford Road currently drains to a 15 inch culvert under that roadway to a wetland area located to the south. Two of the sub-catchments drain to the wetlands to the east of the peninsula, a small area drains to the intermittent stream to the north, and the fourth sub--____ catchment drains to the Vernal Pool Wetland. For analysis relative to pre and post project stormwater flows, these have been grouped to identify the flows to the southerly wetland, combined easterly and northerly wetlands bordering on Mosquito Brook, and the Vernal Pool. Part 3 of this report contains the hydrologic computation and stormwater runoff model to determine the existing stormwater flows from the site. The summary table at the end of this narrative shows the existing peak rates of runoff, to the three main areas for the 1, 2, 10, and 100 year storms, As can be seen from the results, the site generates very little runoff under existing conditions. This is due to the undeveloped nature of the site and the well draining soils that promote infiltration. The small area draining to Boxford Road contains a small depression that captures runoff from the abutting property to the east. The result is that there is virtually no runoff to the culvert under existing conditions. SOILS & GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS Extensive soil testing has been performed on the site in preparation for this project. This included testing performed by PSI, Inc. in the spring of 2002, testing by Schofield Brothers of New England, Inc. and soil borings performed by Weber Engineering Associates performed in January of 2003. The complete reports and logs are contained in - Attachment 6 of the Notice of Intent filing that accompanies this report. According to the USDA Soil Conservation Service Soils Mapping, the entire site contains Hinckley soils which are deep sands and gravels, The Hinckley soils are well drained, permeable, glacial outwash material and are classified in "Hydrologic Soil Group A, Groundwater levels are very deep as indicated'in the test hole logs contained in . Attachment 6. The on-site testing, however, revealed that the area is not all Hinckley soils. The major portion. of the northern section of the peninsula is actually a glacial till more typical of the "Canton" soil type which is also common in this area. The Canton soil is a well draining glacial till in Hydrologic Soil Type B. The extensive soil testing - allowed for•the accurate mapping of the boundaries of theHSG A arid.B.soils_and this ..... ..."�. delineation is shown on the watershed maps in Appendix 3 and Appendix 4. The testing performed by Schofield Brothers of New.England Inc consisted of Deep Hole Tests and Percolation Tests {per Mass Title 5 entena} The testing was done £ —.r- -. r--f.i R }'=.l_r _. - ft �=.��' •.�7, h S �� r .r � 7 �vr• -i! '�Ltw,�,,,�1..i, J �T i r•t 5 r ' ir' >Crr a X"At- ._ trY tl „J . {r,t _ 1, .. .. .. - . . .. ,_ .. :c:-< _��. [,_ .. ...' ... e, Y,r+ i.i2 s- r •fir 9`. 21652 Foster Farm Elementary School Narrative&Summary Page 1- 3 specifically to be used for stormwater management design purposes. Maximum seasonal groundwater elevations were determined by soil morphology and direct observation. The Testing performed by PSI, Inc. was done during the spring high groundwater season, so both the SBNE and the PSI testing gives good data for determination of groundwater Ievels for stormwater design purposes. Samples of the various soils were also obtained for sieve analysis for estimating permeability as well as on-site percolation testing for the purpose of estimating _..exfiltration rates for stormwater infiltration BMPs._Information on this is contained in the Soils Report and in Part 2 of this report. PROPOSED CONDITIONS AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. The proposed project is the construction of an 800-student, 100-staff elementary school (Kindergarten through the 5th grade), with associated utilities, landscaping, patios, parking and driveway. The program includes space for 37 general classrooms as well as special education, art, music, and science classrooms, a cafeteria & kitchen, a multipurpose room with stage platform, and a gymnasium. Current plans propose a two- story steel frame structure with a 70,000 +/- square footprint and 120,000 gross square feet of floor area on a 14 -acre portion of the 77-acre Foster Farm site. On-site parking facilities include striped parking spaces for 116 cars plus additional parallel parking along the loop road that circles the school. The total impervious surface covers just over 5 acres of the site. The stormwater management system for the proposed project must be designed such that there will not be an increase in the peak rate of runoff to the existing wetland resource areas to avoid adverse impacts to the wetland down stream drain drainage systems. Stormwater runoff volumes are also an important consideration due to existing flooding conditions on Mosquito Brook. In addition,The existing hydrology to the vernal pool - --.-: located to the west of the proposed school site is very important. -As can be seen in the - Existing Conditions Summary Table at the end of this Narrative, there is very little surface flow to the vernal pool under normal conditions. The primary input is, therefore, groundwater. The project must not decrease the amount of groundwater in the watershed to the vernal pool to maintain the hydrologic budget of the pool. Careful attention was paid to this and Hydrologic Budget calculations are contained in Part 2 of this report that were used to plan infiltration BMPs for the site. .Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) have been'designed into the proposed system to meet all the standards of the Massa DEP and North Andover Stormwater _'Management Policies. --. In general, the stormwater management system has been designed such that there will be 7- essentially no increase in peak flows for the 1,2, 10 and 100 year storm {Dtie to the fact,f,lir; that the extsttng site generates so little rtihoff,-it is very dtfficult to actually reduce i 21652 Foster Farm Elementary School Narrative&Summary Page 1-4 flows. Comparing the Summary Tables at the end of this section shows that there will be an insignificant increase in peals flow to the wetlands of 0.5 cfs for the 10 year storm to the main wetlands to Mosquito Brook. However, in all cases, the volumes of runoff are reduced under proposed conditions, so there is no impact to the wetland resource areas.) The runoff to the vernal pool and the flow to Boxford Road are virtually unchanged. Since there will be no increase'in the volume for all storms, the'Recharge Standard of the - - - Stormwater Policies is met. Due to the fact that the existing site generates so little runoff, _..numerous stomwater infiltration BMPs.were required to reduce flows to meet the _peak flow requirements. This in turn permitted the no increase in runoff volumes from the site. i To meet the Stormwater Policy requirements, the proposed stormwater management system has incorporated the following features: 1. Several stormwater infiltration facilites are proposed. These include 1 underground infiltration chambers (pits) in the areas of deep sandy (Hinckley) soils, Underground - - (Cultec) chambers in the well draining glacial till soils, and stormwater basins ith infiltration capability. as the BMP to accomplish the desired control. 2. Pre-treatment to underground infiltration systems is very important, therefore, the, parking lot drains include deep sump catch basins,followed by Stormceptor units prior to discharge to the infiltration BMPs.-.This will provide an 85 percent TSS `. removal ahead of the infiltration BMPs.. Both of these BMPs have gas and oil traps for further protection of the BMPs and downstream resource areas. 3. The roof drains will discharge directly to infiltration BMPs. The southerly and northeasterly roof areas will discharge to leaching pit systems and the northwesterly roof area will discharge to an infiltration (cultec infiltrator) system. The roof area is considered clean runoff, so no pretreatment is required for these systems. 4. Two surface basins are proposed. Basin 1 is a retention basin that is designed to infiltrate stormwater. Overflow will occur only during sever storm events. This system incorporates underground infiltration pits to aid in infiltration. The area is well suited to this installation due to the underlying sand and gravel soils that can recharge significant amounts of stormwater flow. The Northeast Basin is a large surface detention basin with some infiltration capability. This basin will receive the infiltration chamber overflow from the northerly storm drain system and the northwesterly roof drain system. The basin is large and gently sloping and will be dry except during major storm events, it will therefore be useable an informal grass play area for the school facility. 5. .Green Schools initiative. . -- _.Through the Green Schools Program, there.is..an_opportunity.to improve the.quaIity of _ .the storiiiwater runoff to the downstream wetland resource areas'beyond the minimum standards for greater environmental benefits -1n this case,-we have incorporated ,l Planted RockA, ters into Basi.n_##1 and the outfall of Vernal he s. m t thd oe Pool ;Thee system toreedt SwaterPm i to reduce i. I � '.A�fi �• Y �- r U ♦ rat 4 j ! r �'y'c = r`y °N $ '-M ._ � qA,! * t 1 '3, S•,,5.,t '+-sN [ atix s. S S- xe l #^cr�i .�a-.�" t1� n �4.LtGh ,-' s,1F3 � .mac 4.t r \�: i't �tE. .r , ?�`.s4'�u�'� tr ; -3 I,�C S!�Y s�1<"�a } '` r Sf s3y Stet -f='n��x-{ A•J 4�.t�i���yy.yy,, t. t f [ �. i'�.�:Srjrt.""t''-1- ri-s,l["s,Q f ;�.?y��f:�.,.-� y..F�.�?. - :" .��F. �Sk:+,t'�" - 5 ;i`r�yt ��4 r"; /�-4 -F- - i -+.�`'"'��t.�..;'+''e���. . t�'.. . ,r�-��� ��"• '.. 21652 Foster Farm Elementary School Narrative&Summary Page 1- 5 i pollutants. This type of system is a state of the art stormwater management technique first designed and tested by Dr. Wolverton while directing biological research for the space program at NASA. The systems are not complex and the base engineering and construction methods are well known. Care and management of the plants and root systems will be typical for evergreen shrubs. They can best be described as a combination of a"Bio-retention System" and a "Submerged Gravel Filter". Rainwater from parking lots and driveways can be collected and treated through Planted Rock Filters (PRFs) to remove automotive chemicals and persistent toxic compounds found An asphalt. These systems use plants that degrade pollutants as water passes through their root systems. Hardy plants, such as evergreen shrubs, are better able to manage the cycles between rain events (too wet and then too dry) than the typical wetlands that have typically been designed for these purposes. The use of evergreen shrubs will also reduce maintenance costs, as they require little or no care. Additional information and design is contained in Part 2 of this Report. } Also through the Green Schools Initiative, a Fain water recovery system is included for the irrigation system of the landscaped areas around the school building. This is a large underground cistern that will receive runoff from the northwest roof area and a pumping system. This system will not significantly impact stormwater flows from large storm events, so it does not impact the calculations in this report since it is assumed to be full prior to a storm event and not available for storage. The Proposed Conditions Watershed Map (Attachment 4) contains the proposed drain system layout and system components, pipe sizes, etc, Specific Design information is contained in Part 2 and the proposed conditions hydrologic model is contained in Part 4. Watershed Modeling and Best Management Practices Designs. The hydrologic analysis of the existing and developed watersheds was based on the ----- -- nationally recognized watershed modeling techniques developed by the USDA, Soil _ Conservation Service (SCS), The techniques and runoff models are described in the following SCS publications: "Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release Number " 55 198& and Technical Release 20. National En ineerin Handbook H Arology, Section 4, 1972. "A Method for Estimating Volume and Rate of Runoff in Small Watersheds,Technical Release No. 149" 1973, ------ Hydrology Handbook for Conservation Commissioners,March 2002, Mass,-DEP. ��5�'�� DTI 21652 Foster Farm Elementary School Narrative&Summary Page 1-6 The watershed modeling was performed using computer software "HydroCad" version 6.1 by Applied Microcomputer Systems, which is based on the publications referenced above. Best management practices were designed utilizing the following publications; -DEP "Stormwater Mana ement Volume Two: Technical Handbook", March, - - 1997 - Design of Storm water Filterin S stems, December 1996 by R.A. Claytor and Schueler. _ .------— ----- -__--- ----------' __.._. ----- ------ - - Stormwater Infiltration, 1994, by Bruce K. Ferguson. _ - "Design of Infiltrative Drainage Systems" 1988, by William R. Domey, P.E. - "Standards and Specifications for Infiltration Practices" Maryland DEM Runoff computations for the flows to individual catch basins for the design of the piping systems in the roadway and parking lots, are for a minimum 25 year storm and are contained in Appendix 2. k _ �"" �s ran ! ( rr �« °ray r�t S {r ` s 3 r •� Y�.XI�+'r-' rt Jt r r - i lam. ✓=f ' •. E � e'ri ' ', - i �' [ �"' [,r°r '�,, a - -` k�- 'ems .-'t��&e.+1'•�..�,c.� ''' �.a•`" '§il'`'r' - r r- "�4 v'-•� 4 k :-r ff 4 �--k'�'AS r-- I�i r x 1JAMFj �` �•J 21652 SOIL TEST REPORT 1 FOSTER FARM SCHOOL SITE BOXFORD ROAD NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS KING clvk .p r�,,ssoas o,� GAS 7 `1 � r " Prepared for: DiNisco Design Partnership 87 Summer Street Boston, MA 02102 Prepared by: Schofield Brothers of New England, Inc, 1071 Worcester Road Frainin;hant, MA 01701 January 28, 2003 ooSCHOFIELD BROTHERS ENGINEERING • SURVEYING PLANNENG LD=SCHOFIELD BROTHERS ENGINEERING • SURVEYIN6 PLANNING Schofield Schofield Brothers of New England,Mc- 1071 Worcester Road Framingham,MA O1701.5298 508-879-0030• 1-800-696-2874 January 28, 2003 Fax 508.879-1797 Websile www,scholieldbros.com i 21652 Kenneth DiNisco DiNisco Design Partnership 87 Summer Street Boston, MA 02I38 RE: Soil Testing Results Poster Farm School Site, North Andover, Massachusetts Dear Mr, DiNisco: On January 22, 2003, Schofield Brothers of New Ency Inc. (SBNE) performed soil testing at the subject site consisting of 13 Deep Hole Tests, six Percolation Tests and eleven Sieve Tests of representative samples of soils found on the site. The locations of the test Pits are shown on the map in Appendix 1. The backhoe service for the testing was provided by Arco Excavators, Inc. of North Andover. The primary purpose of the testing was to determine the general characteristics of the soils for stormwater management purposes. The information is useful in developing site-specific watershed hydrologic models for determining site runoff and peal: flows required for drainage designs and are necessary for the design of various stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) that may be utilized in the proposed school project. Of particular ' importance is the permeability of the soils for stormwater infiltration structures, and the depth to groundwater and bedrock. The information is also useful for pavement design and foundation and building sub-drain design. Prior to performing the soil testing, we researched the available U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service Soils (SCS) Mapping for the area (see Appendix S) and the previous on-site soil testing performed by the Town at the site (see Appendix 6). This was to obtain information as to what soils we were likely to encounter and to plan the testing locations. The testilig was also coordinated with soil borings being performed by the project geotechnical engineering consultant, Weber Engineering Associates. According to the U.S.D.A- mapping, the soils within the upland portion of the school site are classified as "Hinckley" soils. These soils are deep, rapidly permeable sands and gravel glacial outwash deposits with a water table in excess of 6 feet deep. The on-site soil testing confirmed the presence of these soils in the southern potion of the site (Test Holes 03-1 to 03-7 and 03-9). Percolation tests performed in this soil had rates of less than one minute per inch. However, the parent soils (soil below the topsoil and subsoil) on the central ridge and the northern field area was found to be a sandy glacial till with some silt. The USDA . I SESCHONELD BROTHERS E.VG€.VEERI\f: • SLK1E}€\f: PL�\\I.\G 21652 DiNisco Desigil Partnership Soil Test Report—Foster Farm School Site Januar), 28. 2002 Page 2 classification would be a Loamy Sand. This soil is more typical of a "Canton" type soil that the USDA mapping indicates is found at the nearby Conservation Land to the east of the school site. These soils generally have moderate to rapid permeability. The percolation rate in this soils type from the on-site testing was found to be less than 10 minutes per inch. Relatively thin sand deposits on top of" glacial till were found on the side slopes of the central ridge. Groundwater levels in the southern and central portions of the site was found to be relatively deep. The estimated seasonal groundwater levels in the northern fell area from existing grade. groundwater indicators were found to be relatively shallow at between 3.5 to d feet below In cooperation with the test borings being performed by Weber Engineering Associates, some of the test holes were dug near borings in order to help confirm whether the refusal encountered in the borings was ledge or boulders, Test Holes 03-9 and 03-16 were Performed for this purpose, and Tests 03-7 and 03-9 also provide information on ledge that will also be usefirl in that regard. An estimation of the permeability of the soils on the site has been made utilizing the sieve analysis performed and supported by the percolation testing and the USDA soils information. This will be used as the basis for designing stormwater infiltration BMPs that will be a necessary component of the stormwater management design for the project. This information is found in Appendix 4 of this report. ` CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS The southern portion of the site contains deposits of rapidly permeable sands and gravels with relatively deep water table. The central ridge and northern field contains a glacial till soil with moderately rapid permeability. Tile seasonal groundwater level in the northern field is relatively shallow. With respect to stormwater management, this has several important implications as ows; foll The soils in the southern portion of the site are definitely classified to be in Hydrologic Soil Group A. These soils have a high infiltration capacity and produce little runoff. The glacial till soils on site are more typical of a Canton soil. These soils are classified as Hydrologic Soil Group B. This is an important consideration in the development of hydrologic models for determining runoff peak flov's and volumes for the design of drains and other stormwater management structures, The soil testing performed by SBNE, together with the previous testing performed by the Town and the soil borings performed by Weber Engineering Associates, will provide �SCHOFIELD BROTHERS F]GINEERI\(, 5LR1F1'I`G • pLi�\t\(; ' 21652 DiNisco Design Partnership Soil Test Report—Foster Farm School Site January 28, 2002 Page 3 sufficient data to map the boundaries of the A and B soils for the hydrologic modeling. The deep sand and gravel soils in the southern portion of the site have a high capability for the infiltration of stormwater into the ground. The glacial till soils on the central and northern portions of the site are also moderately permeable and are capable ofinfiltrating some stormwater ifnecessary. - The shallow groundwater table in the northern field area will need to be taken into consideration in the design of any stormwater BN Ps and underground tanks or cisterns to protect against floatation. - The sandy nature of the soils will be an important consideration in the design of erosion controls and proper site drainage during construction. The sandy soils will be less susceptible to erosion and are generally more stable when vet, so erosion and sediment control will not likely be a difficult problem to deal with at this site. LIST OF APPENDICIES Appendix I Soil Test Location Map Appendix 2 Deep Hole Test Logs Appendix 3 Sieve Test Results Appendix 4 Percolation Test Results and Summary Table — Soil Analysis for Stormwater Exfiltration Appendix 5 U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service Soils Mapping Information Appendix 6 Soil Test Information From Testing Performed By PSI, file. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to call. I am sending a copy of the report directly to Richard Weber for his information. Very truly yours, Schofield Brothers of New England, Inc. Fredric W. King, P.E. Senior Engineer JUN. 2.2003 5,35PI1 BETA GROUP MA No.295 P.2/16 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOSTER.FARM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS INTRODUCTION General/Site Location Bruce Campbell & Associates (BC&:A) has been retained by Morieee &; Gary, Inc. to study the traffic impacts and transportation issues of the new Foster Farm Elementary School in North Andover,Massachusetts. The new school is expected to have a student population of 800 students at iull occupancy. The proposed school will be located on an undeveloped parcel between Boxford Street and Foster Street, with the access drive located on Boxford.Street approximately 112 mile east of Salem Street. Land use in the area is entirely residential and opera space. A.site location,map can be seen in Figure 1. Definitions The following are brief definitions of terminology used in this report: AM Peak Hour= One hour in the morning when traffic is heaviest. This coincides with both peak commuter times and start of school,usually between 7:00- 9:00 PM. School PM Pear Hour= One hour in the inid-afternoon when traffic is heaviest, This coincides with school release,usually between 2:00-4:00 PM, Commuter PM Peak Hour= One hour in the afternoon when traffic is heaviest, This coincides with peal commuter times, usually between 4:00-6:00 PM. LOS = 1xvel of Service is a quantitative measure used to describe the operation of an intersection. Level of Service values range from LOS A to LOS F. LOS A represents very good operation and LOS F represents'very poor levels of service. Generally, LOS A through D are considered acceptable wbile LOS E and F are considered deficient, Details of the critex-iia are available in the Appendix. Delay Average delay per vehicle in seconds. Rd-253 1 RF-POMDOC Page 1 Bruce Campbell&Associates 6/03 JUH. 2.2003 5:29PH BETA GROUP 14A N0.2q5 P.3/16 I Y cT F r i 1 N0R1M1 A>1flDYaR eo�nrcllfa 4A prLE h E t 4� i+ ,3 %I� :Ci W aLi Gr ygµlEm Andove[ liter i r "R FA F. B nooiwaoo � 9 Ct� � s �\�� �l.'�•i,�' , ti� v .� 6r# � . r _r th40 �! ry € �EdEQ {+' lr�- rm Pit JIM ' !� Im $ 87 O n� H AN r` +n BYAT&• „�y 4 ` 1 4 EA l � ac ct w�nrNur� r,rt , 411 S7,A7'R �vn�•���i, 4 STUDY INTERSECTIONS B C Figure 1 /� SITE LOCATION MAP FOSTER FARM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Not to Scale, NORTH ANDOVER, MA 2'i4dTV� _ i JUH. Z.E003- 5:40PH BETA GROUP MR 1110.295 P,4/16 I II 2002 EMSTING CONDITIONS Roadway Boxford Street is a two-way, 26f foot-wide ,roadway which nuns east-west and extends from its intersection with Salem Street into the Town ofBoxford. It is a winding rural roadway consisting of one lane in each direction,separated by a double yellow center line(DYCL)and also has Solid white edge lines(S'VVEL) on both sides of the road. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Abutting land use is primarily residential in nature. Study Area Intersections Boxford Sfreet/Salein Street/.foster Sheet This four-way intersection unsignalized intersection consists of Salem Street approaching from the west and south, Boxford Street approaching from the east and Foster Street approaching from the north. Salem Street eastbound and Boxford Street westbound are the mainline,while Salem Street northbound and Foster Street southbound are under Stop sign control, The mainline of Boxford Street and Salem Street eastbound is 29 feet wide with a DYCL and SWEL on both sides of the roadway. The northbound and southbound approaches Are slightly offset from each other. Salem Stroet northbound includes a small island and a DYCL separating the approach from the departure and S'ViTEL on both sides of the roadway. Salem Street northbound is 26 feet wide, but flares out considerably at the intersection. Foster Street is 26 feet wide,but also flares out at the intersection. There is also a sight distance issue for a vehicle stopped on Foster Street looking to the right(west). Presently an embanl nent and trees restrict sight distance. Vehicles from Foster Street must pull up into the intersection to have a clear view of the westbound approaching traffic on Boxford Street. Both Salem Street nox-tliboun;d and Foster Street contain Stop-signs but no Stop-lines. Land use is the area is residential. Our field investigation revealed that it may be unclear to some drivers which approaches have the right of way at the intersection. Furthermore, it was noted during the field visit that a vehicle traveling on the mainline stopped to allow a side street vehicle to pull out. Boxford Street/Forest Street This three-way unsignalized intersection consists of Boxford Street running in an east/west direction and Forest Street approaching from the south. Boxford Street is the mainline while Forest Street is under Stop sign control. Forest Street is a narrow 20 foot wide roadway with no pavement markmp. Boxford Streef/Stoneeleave Road This three-way unsignalized intersection consists of Boxford Street running in an east/west direction and Stonecleave road approaching fTom the north. Boxford Streetis the mainline,vhile Stonecleave is under Stop-control. Stonecleave is a 25 foot wide, dead end subdivision:roadway. Rcf,253 iREPORT.00C Page 2 Bruce Cuupball&Associaes 6/03 u�y. c.c�JE1a 4"HII BETA GROUP MR NQ,z9S P.S/16 1 Existing Data Collection • Traffic Counts Traffic cotmts were conducted at the study area intersections on Monday April 22,Tuesday April 23, and Monday April 29,2002 when school was in session,between the hours of 7:00 to 9:00 AM and 2:00 to 6:00 PM. From the AM and PM traffic Counts, the four highest consecutive 15 minute intervals were selected to identify the commuter peals hours, In addition,the school peals hour found between the hours of 2:00 to 4:00 PM was analyzed. Peak hour volumes are presented on the study area traffic networks. The raw volumes were then balanced between intersections. Observations regarding pedestrian volumes,bicycle activity and truck activity were also recorded in addition to the vesicle counts. The pear hours varied somewhat by intersection,but were generally considered to be 7:30-8:30 AM, 3:00-4:00 PM (School PM) and 5:00-6:00 PM. To dete mine whether the April ftaffic cotu7.t data required a seasonal adjustment,the Massldighway weekday seasonal adjustment factors worksheet was reviewed. The MassHighway seasonal factors are based on statewide traffic data collection and are classified by roadway type. Group 6 (urban arterials, collectors and rural arterials), was used to determine that April traffic is typically higher than average monthly traffic Conditions, To be conservative, no adjustments were made to the volimies. The seasonal factor sheets can be fowid in the Appendix. The 2002 Existing peak hour traffic networks are presented in, Figure 2, Table l shows the total entering volume at each intersection during the weekday AM, School PM, and Commuter PM pear hours. Table 1 Tota.1 Entering Volume at Study Area Intersections(Vehicles Por Hour) Iartxee�ip�i: ; ; ,-AN:5' c;i SG�toA� �+!�,r 't'otitltrCer'i'lYl'�. noxford Stremusalem Street/Foster Street 950 735 924 Boxford Stroct/Forest Street 596 421 513 Boxford Stroot/Sroneeleave Road 402 233 299 Existing Vehicle Delays In addition to the traffic count information noted above, existing vehicle delay measurements at study area intersection were recorded at both intersections. These actual values will be compared to the computed delays in a later section of the report, Sight Distance Available sight distance is critical in establishing safe maneuverability of vehicles entering and exiting driveways and intersections. Adequate sight distance is based on the available sight lines and the speed in which vehicles are traveling, The posted travel speed directly in front of the site drive is 35 mph. In addition,BC&A conducted speed trials to measure the travel Speed of vehicles passing the site; on average, both eastbound and Westbound vehicles measured 39 mph. Ref'.253IREPORT,DOC Page 3 Bruce Campbell&Associates 6/03 ulv, c.LU0 5:40PIl BETA GROUP MA 110.235 P•6i16 w � a cn w� 1i w to �� —35 8 DX D .—091 $QkFOR� 3� F � �203 SAL IR 4� 20g�STRE �rz 1s9-� m 76 PEAK HOUR w Ld Wo z� 4 b N �mrnl +172 g Xf 146 ��kFoRb o SAS 1� —7 �a EQgD rJ �TRE •—�2a SiR 69 4 1 15R -+- f g J $6 wrrn 65 ti- w � N WEEKDAY SCHOOL � PM PEAK HOUR vS � w w � �© U 41� � 2 OO Q in auv -.-20i �bbXFOoRRD t�72 '�ORD r� �117 SALE GREET 1� STREET73 . ` r 38 291 O�LOCO 6 da 156 w WEEKDAY COMMUTER ¢ � PM PEAK HOUR u, B Figure 2 2002 EXISTING WEEKDAY AM, SCHOOL PM AND A COMMUTER PM PEAK DOUR VOLUMES FOSTER FARM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Not to $Gale NORTH ANDOVER, MA 2,445TVS JU . 2,2003 5:41PM BETA GROUP 11A NO.E95 P.7i1E For a vehicle exiting the site, the sight distance is restricted to the right(east)by a sharp horizontal curve and vertical grade. Available sight distance was measured based on the proposed location of the school access drive. Sight:distance would be approxhnately 430 feet at this location, According to the 4t"Edition ofthe Policy on Geometric Design of y-f ghways and streets',for a travel speed of 35 mph, a sight distance of 335 feet is required, and for a speed of 40 mph 385 feet is required, Therefore,the sight distance at the proposed site drive will meet AASHTO requirements in both directions, Accident History A accident data summary for the study area intersections was obtained from the Registry of Motor Vehicle files, maintained by MassHigh`,yay, for the years 1999, 2000 and 2001, Table 2 summarizes the reported accidents, In addition, the crash rate was also calculated and compaxed to the Massachusetts average. It was noted that the "Crash bate" for all of the intersection were calculated to be lower than the State Average. Table 2 Accident Data Summ,ury year- `total , AuIegari ;: e anif. a > t~ i rt� Y' aialiy' r 'slt. ate I lf�i Salem Street/Boxfo.,rd Stxeet/Boster Street 1999 I 2000 2 1 _ i 2 _ 0,62 2001 4 l l 2 2 2 7 7- Boxford Street/Forest Street 1999 - - - - - - 2000 2001 1 l _ _ 0.16 1 _ Note., No accidents were reported at the intersection of k1oxford Street /Stonecleave Road * Source: MassHighway Department Average Statewide Crash Rate; 0,66 for timignalized intersection, 0.87 for Signalized interaeation t American Association of State 14ighways and Trwsponation Officials,2001 Ref.2531REPORT,DOC Page 4 Bruce Campbell Associates 6/03 J ufv. e.Luo: 7 5 t 41P{1 BETA GROUP MP NO.2`35 P.2r 16 Intersection Operations HCM Methodology A.level of service(LOS)analysis was conducted at the study area intersections using the procedures outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual 2. The latest methodology for unsignalized levels of service(A-F)was used and is based solely on delay. The delay is based on capacity which is based on gap aeceptmice and intersection volumes. The LOS results utilizing the Highway Capacity Software(TICS)programs are noted in Table 3 for the weekday AM,School PM,and Corrunuter PM peak hours. The LOS analysis worksheets and cizteria for unsignalized intersections are included in the Appendix, Table 3 2002 Existi Level of Service Results yI`Pea$c i ptlr' Cli�ol k�h4 PL � mj�1ller PM XnterS$�tion M4vrriet�X„ peaky;aur ' LOS :D�la' !a_,O'S: 1646� Los. f}ela Salem Street/ Salem Street eastbound left A 8.2 A 7.7 A 7.8 Boxford street/ Boxford Street westbound left A 8.0 A 8.0 A 8.4 Foster Street Salem Suvetuortbbound E 42,1 C 20.7 D 34,5 Foster Streetsouthbound B 14.3 B 11,1 B 11,3 33oxford Street/ Boxford Street westbound left A 7,7 A 7.7 A 8.0 Forest Street Forest Street northbound B 13.6 B 10.9 B 12.6 Boxford Street/ Soxford Street eastbound left A 7.7 A 7.5 A 7.5 Stonecleyve Road Stonecleave Roar/southbound B 10,2 A 9.0 A 819 LOS-level of service;delay in seconds per vehicle According to the analysis, the Salem Street northbound approach experiences some delays (LOS E/D) during the AM and Commuter PM peak hours. All other movements at the study area intersections operate satisfactorily at LOS A or 13. Existing Vehicle Delays The computed delays presented above in Table 3 were Compared to the actual delays observed in the field. This comparison of computed and observed del ays at the intersection of Salem Street/Boxford Street/Foster Street can be seers in Table 4 below. On all approaches,the observed delays were lower than the computed delays. 2 2000R'ighsvay Capaoity Manual;Transportation Research Board. Rof;2531R1 PflItT,1]QC paga5 Bruce Campbell S Associates 6/03 JUN. 2.20010 5:41PM BETA GROUP MR No.295 P.9i16 { Table 4 Salem Street/Aoxf'ord Street/Foster Street Corn arison of l xisting Observed Vehicle Delays to Com tired.Vehicle pela A rpap k► Condition Hour: Pe ur Salem.Street northbound Computed 42,1 20.7 34.5 (loft and through movements only) Observed 26,6 12.3 13.1 ,Poster Street soutltbound Computed 14.3 11.1 11.3 1.Observed 11.9 103 9.9 LOS=1avel of service Bela iu seconds per vehicle Ref 2531REPOR•P.DOC rage 6 3mce Campbell$Associates 6/03 JUN, z.20OZ-1 5:41PH BETA GROUP IAA HO.P35 i 2007 NO BUILD CONDITIONS 2007 No Build Volumes Generally, there are two components to the future year No Build condition-normal traffic growth and area background developments. The North Andover Planning Department was contacted to E identify as annual growth rate, and background developments. The planning department did not have a background growth rate available;therefore,to be consistent with previous studies for BC&A conducted in North Andover, a growth rate of 1%per year was used. The planning department identified the proposed new fire station at the corner of Salem Street/Boxford Street as the only known area project. Fire stations are typically very low traffic generators, and therefore it was assumed any additional traffic due to the fire station will be accounted for in the background growth rate. Therefore,the 2002 traffic volumes were increased by 5.1% 0% compounded for 5 years), These volumes are shown in Figure 3, 2007 No Build Level of Service,Analysis Level of service analysis was performed for the 2007 No Build condition with the same assumptions as the existing analysis, The LOS results are shown.in Table 51 Table 5 2007 No Build Level of Service Results A ' ►Qkxtr;: S�liFei>FM,PG;}lc, p'Qtnt��ttt�t I�Ivi FnterseettAtj Mo�+t rrixtx. ;: iojlr; I'Ba�C NAatr ,LQS. 'Do a -LOS: ela,. LOS' T j la Salem Street/ Salem Street eastbound left A 8.2 A 7.8 A. 7.8 Boxford Street/ Boxford Street westbound left A 8.0 A 8.0 A 8.4 Foster Street Salem Street northbound F 54,6 C 22.8 E 41.6 Foster Street southbound B 15.1 B 11.3 B 11.5 Boxford Street/ Boxford Street westbound left A 7.7 A 7.7 A 8,0 Forest Street Forest Street northbound B 14.1 B 11.1 13 12.9 Boxford Street/ Boxford Street mtbound left A 7.8 A 7.5 A 7.5 Stoneoleavc Road Stonecleaye Road southbound B 10.3 A 9,0 A 8.9 [LOS-level of service;delay in seconds per vehicle According to the analysis, under the 2007 No Build, the Salem Street northbound approach will experience significant delays (LOS 11/B) during the AM and Commuter PM peals hours. All other Movements at the study area intersections operate at LOS A or B. Ref-253 ULEPORT.DOC Page 7 $Race,Ctunpbell&As9ooistes 6/03 JUN. 2.2003 5.42PM BETA GROUP ILIA NO.295 P. 11i16 w d � c.rvt�n 376 BC)XFORD OQS �oxpo?a Sr Nu7 SALE r 1 STREET y �- 213 STREET36 211, � � 5 20 211 cv�u� "� 17B h 1 � WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR vi r z O � mrn 18i a p54 $aXFfl�,Q So }28 SALE Fir sTRE ,.� 181—*- 8-� ;3 r� 88 ,n 84 90-� h � WEEKDAY SCHOOL PM PEAK HOUR vi 2 w� wa3N fill �jB1 QQkFQRQ r� �123 SALE STRE TRT 26 � STRE 306 ca 8 164 131 ^cv WEEKDAY COMMUTER PM WEAK }-FOUR v 4 S Figure 3 I2007 NO BUILD WEEKDAY AM, SCHOOL PM AND A COMMUTER PM WEAK DOUR VOLUMES FOSTER FARM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Not to Scale NORTH ANDOVER, MA 214"i "VS iLIH. 5:412P111 BETA GROUP MR NO.295 P. 12/1b VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION The vehicle trip generation for the proposed project was estimated using the natsonaUy-accepted methods of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (TTE) Trip Generation manual. The manual Contains equations to formulate trip generation rates for hundreds of land ruses. The trip generation for an 800 studmt Elementary School(Land Use Code#520)was calculated,and is shown in Table 6 below, The manual does not contain data for the weekday Commuter PM peak hour. Therefore, Lasing data recorded from elementary schools, a ratio between the School PM peak hour and Committer PM peak hour was established. 'Using this ratio,the trip generation for the Commuter PM peak hour was estimated, Table 6 Trip GallerAou* Weekday AM Peak Weokday School PM Weekday Conmiuter Peak PM Pea1c11 Daily In out Total In Out Total Xa opt ToW Elementary School(LUC 137 95 232 96 112 208 26 30 56 770 #520) (800 atudents) # Source Trip Generation,Institute of T wsportatlon Engineers, 6th Edition;Washiogton,D.C. 1997. #Not Available ffom ITE data, Trip Distribution The trip distribution for the proposed school was based on the site location in relation to the suiTounding residential area.and other existing elementary schools in North Andover. The Town of North Andover presently has five elementary schools,with students distributed to schools based on geographical location. According to the school department, this is expected to continue with the opening of'the proposed school. Using the percentage of residential houses in the area likely to use particular routes to the school,a trip distribution was established. According to this breakdown 25% of vehicles will approach via Salem Street to the west, 25% of vehicles will approach via Salem Street to the south,22%of vehicles will approach via Foster Street to the north, 15%of vehicles will approach via Forest Street to the south, 7% of vehicles will approach via Boxford Street to the east, and 2%will approach via Stonecleave Road. In addition, approximately 4% will be from Boxford Street and Candlestick Road near the site and will not show up at any study area intersections except for the site chive. The vehicle trips estimated above were distributed to the study area intersection using this distribution to form the vehicle site trip generation shown in Figure 4. D-ip Got:erasion,Institute of Transportation ffij&eers,6th Editim;Washin,gtQu,D.C. 1997. Ref;253IREPORT.D©C Pago 8 Bruce Campbcll&Associates 6103 JUN. 2.2002 5:42PM EFTA GROUP MA 110.295 P, 1 3i 1 6 PROPOSEb IN = 137 ELEMENTARY N j SCHOOL TOTAL- 2 2 li �13 21OXFQI�O 64 124 gOkF�RD 10 SALE Ir 2 STREET �,�r STREET3h f 98 1 Lq l WEEKDAY AM `" PEAK HOUR I vim, ~ PROPOSER 1QU _ i62 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL 2013 wa Q 8c a u ►-s 25 E31 $�x�-�, N SALE 28 SEET O �r�17 B7 RD 7 S � 1 .+�— STREET WEEKDAY SCHOOL PM PEAK HOUR vai PROPOSED o IN 26 � ELEMENTARY TOTAL— ,OUT 30 SCHOOL 56 0 � NI n � O 3 VS j ctA 7 23 23 �t 8�kfip rJ W SALE l� J� S TRE7� 4 RO STRE I� 2 STREET �r WEEKDAY COMMUTER J' � PM PEAK HOUR r¢n B C Figure 4 WE, AM, SCHOOL PM AND A COMMUTER PM TRIP GENERATION FOSTER FARM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Not to Seo-ue NORTH ANDOVER, MA 294t4TVI JUN. E.E000� 5:42PM BETA GROUP MA 110.295 P. 14/16 I 2007 BUILD CONDMONS 2007 Build Volumes j To obtain the 2007 Build volumes, the net increase in site generated trips for the proposed school were added to the 2007 No Build traffic volvane networks. The resulting 2007 Build weekday AM and School PM peak hour networks are shown,in Figure S. 2007 Build (Level of Service Analyses Level of service analysis was perfbim.ed for the 2007 Build conditions. The LOS results are shown in Table 7 below. Table 7 2007 Build Lovel of Seivico Results AM Pe c 1 fotli , 'dell col}ylYi, Oak• ;' attlntuler 'M lttter5ectiori mover nt' �tlttt Q C spur °ZQS I r v LOS l�elli' �[QS 1�el�v Salem Street/ Sabot Street eastbound left A 8.4 A 1.9 A 7.9 Boxford Street/ Boxford Street westbound left A 8.2 A 8.2 A 8.5 Foster StroaE Salem Street northbound r 99.7 D 29.7 E 481 Foster Street souhbound C 23,9 C 15.1 B 12,8 Boxford Street/ Boxford Street westbound left A 8.0 A 7.9 A 8.1 Forest Street Forest Street northbound C 17,5 B 12.7 B 13.5 Boxford Street/ Boxford Street oastbound left A 7.8 A 7.5 A 7.5 Storzecleave Road Stonecleavo Rond southbound 13 10.4 A 9,0 A 8.9 Boxford Street/ Boxford Street eastbound left A 8.3 A 7.8 A 7.6 School Site))rive School Site Drive Southbound B 11.3 B 10.1 A 9.4 Los=level of service; defy in secands per vehicle According to the analysis, with the project, under the 2007 Build, the Salem Street northbound approach will continue to experience delays (LOS FIB) during; the AM and Commuter PM peak hours, All other m.ovemants at the study area intersections operate satisfactorily at LOS A, B or C. Ref;2531 REPOltT.DOC Ptige 9 Bnice Cainpbell&Associates 6103 JUN. 2.2003 5 43PM DETA GROUP MA NO.235 P. 1.5i16 PROPOSED ELEMENTARY Q 7 U = 95 SCHOOL TOTAL= 232 LO 2482338pkFpR Nub y SALE lr 350 5 � D 1 124 0 5 �-223 183— STRE za � 3b0�t in; 80 Ld WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR � o PROPOSED IN - 96 ELEMENTARY OUT . 112 SCHOOL -TOTAL- 206 n OO 1�¢4 137& Laos +r-2 9 60XF A 235 107-r O RD 5n7£ �-133 SALE r 3 STf7F�� S- 7 - 230 � r 1�J �AM 68� 107 WEEKDAY sCHaoL � �5 PM PCAK HOUR rn ►� ~ PROPOSED { T = 35 u� ELEMENTARY N SCHOOL TOTAL- 56 00 'k-130e o � mrnm r-219 gp�F ��04 23� pk�pR4 j ..-125 SALE lr 20 STREW D 163 � SIRE _ 3 2667E 1$6 31 � -� 131-� +-�'- s-- WEEKDAY COMMUTER �� a PM PEAK HOUR yr ° B C Figure 5 2007 BUILD WEEKDAY AM, SCHOOL PM AND A COMMUTER PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FOSTER FARM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Not to Scale NORTH AP(HOVER, MA 294:�TVR JUN. 2.2003 5:4 3PM BETA GROUP MA MITIGATION Foster Farm Elementary School Site Drive The westbolmd approach to the site will be widened by 4 feet for right turning vehicles. This will allow through traffic to by-pass vehicles which are turning right to enter the school. Salem Street(Boxford Street/Foster Street This Four-way intersection presently operates at LOSE and will operate at LOS 1�with or without the school project in place. The poor level of service is due mainly to the high number of left turns on the northbound approach. Of more concern than the poor level of service is the existing alignment and delineation at the intersection. The northbound and southbound approaches are ot=l'set froin each other, creating awkward movements. In addition stop-lines are not present. Also there is an intersection sight distance issue for vehicles traveling on Foster Street southbound looking to the right (west). Vehicles must pull into the intersection to see past an embankment; and trees. At a minimum, the trees should be trimmed and/or removed to improve the sight distance for this location. Furthermore, the stop lines should be repainted for the northbound and southbound approaches. A traffic signal warrant analysis was performed to determine if installation of a traffic signal would be warranted under 2007 Build conditions. The 2000 Edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) contains a total of eight signal warrants; none of these warrants are met using 2007 Build condition traffic volumes. CONCLUSION The Town of North Andover is proposing to build a new 900 student elementary school on Box.ford Street in North Andover Massachusetts. Based on the M Trip Generation manual,an 800 student elementary school will generate 770 total trips per weekday resulting in 232 total trips during the weekday AM peals hour,208 total trips daring the School PM peak hour and 56 total trips dining the Commuter PM peak hour, There are minimal impacts at the school drive and at the analyzed intersections. It should be noted that a soccer complex has been proposed and is cinTently under construction adjacent to the school site, This complex was not anticipated at the time of this study and therefore any traffic impacts of the soccer complex are not reflected in this study, A supplemental study will follow to reflect the soccer complex traffic impacts to the study area. Ref.2531 PLEPORT,DOC Page 10 Boce Campbell&,Associewq 6103 i i i i June 26, 2003 Mr. Rick Rice DiNisco Design Partnership 87 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Re: Foster Farm Elementary School Supplemental Traffic Impact Study J-2531 Dear Mr. Rice: As noted in our traffic impact study for the Foster Farm Elementary School dated June 2003, we have performed the supplemental traffic impact study to incorporate vehicular trips generated by the proposed Foster Fann Soccer Complex. The soccer complex is currently under construction by the Town of North Andover. It is located west of the proposed Foster Farm Elementary School. The soccer complex consists of 2 soccer fields which can also be used for lacrosse and field hockey. The access drive to the soccer complex is approximately 750 feet west of the school driveway. 11IIICLE TRIP GENERATION The Foster Farm Soccer Complex is anticipated to be open by the fall of 2003, and is independent of the Foster Farm Elementary School. The athletic department of the North Andover School Department was contacted to determine usage at the soccer complex. According to the athletic department, high school athletes would temporarily use the complex during the 2003-2004 school year while a new High school is being constructed. The primary users of the soccer complex would be North Andover youth soccer organizations. The athletic department estimated that 80 people would travel to and from the soccer complex for evening games and practices. No activities will occur during the morning and school release period, therefore there will be no impact during these time periods. These 80 trips were distributed to the study area roadway network during the Commuter PM peak hour only. To be conservative, we cleten-nined that 80 velicles will arrive and depart from the site during the PM peak hour period. Departure times will vary based on season due to the variance in available daylight hours. Trip Distribution Vehicles traveling to the soccer complex were distributed along the study area roadway network during the Commuter PM peak hour. These vehicles were distributed based on existing travel patterns. Vehicle trip distribution associated �,vitlj the soccer complex is shown in Figure 1. r. Rick Rice ine 26, 2003 age 2 2007 BUILD CONDITIONS 2007 Build Volumes To obtain the 2007 Build volumes, the net increase in site generated trips for the proposed school, along Ninth trips generated by the proposed soccer complex, were added to the 2007 No Build traffic volume networks. The resulting 2007 Build weekday AM and School PM peak hour networks are shown in Figure 2. 2007 Build Level of Service Analyses Level of service analysis was performed for the 2007 Build conditions. The LOS results are shown in Table I below. Table 1 2007 Build Level of Service Results AM Peak Hour School PM Peak Commuter PM Intersection Movement !-lour Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay__ Salem Street/ Salem Street eastbound left A 8.4 A 7.9 A 8.0 Boxford Street/ Boxford Street westbound left A 8.2 A 8.2 A 8.7 Foster Street Salem Street northbound F 99.7 D 29.7 F 75.1 Foster Street southbound C 23.9 C 15.1 B 14.0 Boxford Street/ Boxford Street westbound left A 8.0 A 7.9 A 8.2 Forest Street Forest Street northbound C 17.5 B 12.7 C 15.3 Boxford Street/ Boxford Street eastbound left A 7.8 A 7.5 A 7.6 Stonecleave Road Stonecleave Road southbound B 10.4 A 9.0 A 9.1 Boxford Street/ Boxford Street eastbound left A 8.3 A 7.8 A 7.7 School Site Drive School Site Drive southbound B 113 B 10.1 A 9.7 LOS=level of service; delay in seconds per vehicle According to the analysis, with the soccer complex, under the 2007 Build, the Salem Street northbound approach will continue to experience delays (LOS F) during the AM and Commuter PM peak hours. All other movements at the study area intersections operate satisfactorily at LOS A, B or C. It should be noted that under the no-build condition, the Salem Street northbound approach will operate at LOS F and E during the AM and Commuter PM peak period, respectively. The vehicular trips associated with the Foster Farm Elementary School during the Commuter PM peak period at this intersection is minimal (3.7% of total vehicles entering the intersection) compared to the vehicular trips generated by the soccer complex (9.3% of total vehicles entering the intersection). i lr. Rick Rice �1 tine 26, 2003 Page 3 CONCLUSION There will be no impact during the AM and school release peak period associated with the Foster Farm Soccer Complex. Based on the analysis, there will be iuinimaI impact to the surrounding roadway network as a result of the soccer complex and the elementary school during the Conunuter PM peak period. No additional mitigation is required resulting from the additional trips generated by the soccer complex and the mitigation measures identified in the original traffic impact study are still valid. We trust that this supplemental information sufficiently addresses the added impact of the Foster Farm Soccer Complex as it relates to the impacts of the Foster Farms Elementary School. If you should require any additional information, please contact our office. Very truly yours, BETA Group, Inc. . Mr. Kien Y. Ho, P.E. Associate FOSTER FARM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY APPEND 05) C Bruce Campbell & Associates ^� A Q01jo Group Company Transportation Engineers & Planners 315 Norwood Park South, Norwood, MA 02062 tel:781-255-1982 fw 781-255-1974 ■e-mail:BETA@BETA-inc.com June 2003 I I i APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA A1.1 - A 1.25 TRIP GENERATION/DISTRUBUTION A2.1 2002 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE All - A3.10 2007 NO BUILD LEVEL OF SERVICE A4.1 - A4.9 2007 BUILD LEVEL OF SERVICE A5.1 - A5.12 Lighting Architectural Arm-Mounted Cutoff I r�s M Intended Use Electrical— 15OW and below utilize a high reactance, high power factor. 175W and For streets, walkways, parking lots and above use a constant-wattage autotrans- l surrounding areas. former ballast 42W uses an electronic high ` ` frequency ballast. Ballasts mounted on Features removable power tray with tool-less latch Housing —Die-cast single piece aluminum and have positive locking disconnect with nominal Vs`wall thickness. Integral Plugs. Ballasts are copper wound and h arm provides easy installation to pole or 100% factory tested. a wall. Housing completely sealed against Finish—Standard finish is dark bronze(DDB) st llr` moisture or environmental contaminants, polyester powder finish. Other architec- hl Door Assembly---Die-cast door frame,im- tural colors available. dt pact-resistant, tempered, glass lens, 3J,6' Socket— Porcelain, medium-base socket Le thick, fully sealed with one-piece tubular for AS 1, mogul-base socket for AS2,with nu silicone gasket, Tool-less entry and clo- copper alloy nickel-plated screw shell and re sure via spring loaded die-cast latches, center contact. UL listed. ke `- Optics -- Anodized segmented reflectors Listings—US Patent no,D447,590.UL List- for superior uniformityand control.Reflec- ed (standard). CSA Certified or NOM cer- Lei `z tors attach with tool-less fasteners and tified (see options), Canadian patents wit are rotatable and interchangeable, pending. UL listed for wet locations, IP Mc certified. Meets IESNA full cutoff criteria, ort Installation — Heavy duty mounting block attaches to pole or wall to provide ease of ton For product details and performance data,see the OUTDOOR Opt installation as well as ensured alignment binder or the on-bric catalog at www.ldlrania.com. Wdf and levelling. tors ring Information Example: AS1 150S SR2120 SF LPI On a U 2, 2, :slgnation Distribution Voltage Mounting' Options/Accessories f ensure 5adiurn SR2 Segmented Type 11 120,2083,2903,277, Included installed 355 I roadway 347,480',T64 SPA Square pole mounting SF Single fuse, 120,277,347V(n!a TO)' BV, 'OS 70S SR3 Segmented Type III RPA Hound pole mounting DF Double fuse,208, 240,460V(Ala TDIF BV., asymmetric toa5 WBA wall bracket fup or PER NEMA twist-lock receptacle only ov, 150S S94SC Segmented Type IV down) Ino photocontrall RV: 2005 forward throw, 5hillped separately ORS ftuarle restrike system (looW max. BVe 250$ sharp cutoff AS),25OW max.AS2,lamp not �detal 400S SR4W Segmented Type IV ASKMAI Mast arm adapier(Sizet) included) (n(a TRT)6 BV2 ;Hide wide, forward throw ASHMA2 Mast arm adaptedSize2) OR Corrosion-resistant finish BV2 5{3M (size 2 only) Additmnal mourning and accessories HS House-side shield BV2 70M SH5S Segmented Type V available.consult factory EC Emergency circuit' BV2 loom square TP Tamperproof r€ BV2 15DfV# 19 -A . ..C J SCWA Super CWA Pulse Start Ballast(not 175M NOTES: Drilling Pattern available with HPS,TRT or 50m. BV2 290MI 1 Must be ordered with SCWA option, (see pale ordering pg. 358) 175m) BV2 25OM2 2 May be ordered with SCWA option.3 Consult factory for availability in Canada. OM19 AS 1 at90° Lpt Lamp included (standard) 320M' L/LP Less lamp 350MI 4 Optionalmurti-lapballast T2b,208,24a,277v:120,2r7, DM28•AS 2 at 180' 4(10Mz 347vinCanada). OM29-AS 2 at 90' ESA GSA Certified 5 Haunting kit standard. DM39-AS 3 at 90' NOW NOM Certified I FlUpreSCent 6 SF,DForgAS options cannot be ordered together. o For optionalarchiteciuralColors,seepage349. 7 Consult factory for availabibiv. OM49-AS 4at90 t 42TRT aas'only} DM32-AS 3 at 120'(Round Shinned separately poles only) PE1 NEMA twist-lock PE(120,2G8,240Y) PE3 NEMA twist-lock PE(347V) PE4 NEMA twist-lock PE(480V) Dimensions are shown in inches Icentimetersl unless otherwise noted. PE7 NEMA twist-lock PE (277V) 5C Shorting cap olmenalo a1 asz AS1VG Vandal guard Size lI tk 01:,erwiat Length 21.38' 28• g Width 12.5' 1625' AS2VG Vandal guard (Size 21 >_ E Height 6.28' 9.25' For tenon sliph,ters,concur factory. '{ EF t Len Sx Wi yl Hei Max.wei P. Outdoor Lighting AS67 /A ciryanu a cicHnn+a /1 Llrh :a Lighting Architectural Arm-Mounted Cutoff s TM r'S Intended Use Electrical— 15OW and below utilize a high reactance, high power factor. 175W and For streets, walkways, parking lots and above use a constant-wattage autotrans- surrounding areas. former ballast.42Wuses an electronic high frequency ballast. Ballasts mounted on CID Features removable power tray with tool-less latch Housing —Die-cast single piece aluminum and have positive locking disconnect with nominal 1/a"wall thickness. Integral Plugs. Ballasts are copper wound and l arm provides easy installation to pole or 100% factory tested, wall. Housing completely sealed against Finish--Standard finish is dark bronze(DDBI moisture or environmental contaminants. polyester powder finish. Other architec- c i Door Assembly--Die-cast door frame,im- tural colors available, pact-resistant, tempered, glass lens, 3/16" Socket— Porcelain, medium-base socket L thick, fully sealed with one-piece tubular for ASI, mogul-base socket for AS2,with n silicone gasket Tool-less entry and clo- copper alloy nickel-plated screwshell and rr sure via spring loaded die-cast latches. center contact. UL listed, k' tv Optics -- Anodized segmented reflectors Listings—US Patent no.D447,5%UL List- L( for superior uniformity and control.Reflec- ed (standard). CSA Certified or NOM cer- w tars attach with tool-less fasteners and tified (see options). Canadian patents are rotatable and interchangeable. pending. UL listed for wet locations. IP M Certified. Meets IESNA full cutoff criteria or Installation — Heavy duty mounting block attaches to pole or wall to provide ease of to installation as well as ensured alignment For product details and performance data,see the Ot3TeueR Op hinder or the online catalog at lm lrthonra.com. and leveling. Vio for ring information Example: AS1 150S SR2120 SF LPi 0 277_� PA — esignation Distribution Voltage Mounting' Options/Accessories -essure Sodium SR2 Segmented Type II 120,2013,2401,277, Included Installed Hit 355 roadway 347,4803,TB4 SPA Square pole mounting SF Single fuse, 120,277,347V(n/a TB)5 70S SR3 Segmented Type III RPA Round pole mounting OF Double fuse, 208,240,480V(n/a TB)' 1C0S asymmetric WBA wall bracket lug or PER NEMA twist-lock receptacle only 150S SR4SC Segmented Type 1V down) (no photocontrol) 2005 forward throw, Shipped separately (IRS Quartz restrike system (i00w max. 250E sharp cutoff AS1,25OW max.AS2,lamp not A4 4005 SR4W Segmented Type IV ASKMAI Mast arm adapler(Sizel) included)Wa TRT16 latide wide, forward throw ASKMA2 Mast arm adaplerl$ize2) CR Corrosion-resistant finish 50M (size 2 only) Additional mounting and accessories HS House-side shield 70M S85S Segmented Type V available,consult lactory EC Emergency circuit] lo0M square TP Tamperproof 150M SCWA Super CWA Pulse Start Ballast {not 175M NOTES: Drilling Pattern available with HPS,TRT or 50m- 200M1 1 Must be ordored with SCWA option. (See pole ordering pg. 3581 175m1 250M2 2 May beorderedwilhSCWAopCon. DM19-AS 1 ai90° LP1 Lamp included )standard) 350Mt a OptionConsulal multiyforavlast(1 availability 08,24Dda. DM28-AS 2 at 180 L/LP Less lamp 350M1 4 tiPrionalmullidaphallasti120,2a8,240,277V;12e,277, ° 347VInCanadat. DM29-AS 2 at 90° CSA CSA Certified 4© 1 5 Mounting kit standard. 7 DM39 AS 3 at 90° NOW Ni)M Certified f 110reSCenl 6 SF,OF or ORS options cannot be ordered together. ° For optional architectural colors,see page 349, 7 Consupractorctoryfur availability. DM49-AS 4 at 90 42TRT OM32-AS 3 at 120°(Round Shiooed separately =�t entyr alas only)p Y PE1 NEMA twist-lock PE(120,208,240V) r PE3 NEMA twist-lock PE(347V) I PE4 NEMA twist-lock PE(480V) therwierwise noted. I! Dimensions are shown in inches tcenNmeters)unless PE7 NEMA twist-lock PE (277VI o Asr AS2 SC Shorting cap oir Length 21.W 2W A11V1 Vandal guard (Size 1] err, J02=� Width 12,5" 16,25' ASZVG Vandal guard (Size 2) L Height 6.28" 825" For tenon slipfitters,consult ractorv. H Outdoor Fighting PSG] 4A I_1rHz,v1A L/GHT//VG fi Lighting Architectural Arm-Mounted Cutoff TM r�s Intended Use Electrical-- 150W and below utilize a high reactance, high power factor. 175W and For streets, walkways, parking lots and above use a constant-wattage autotrans- . surrounding areas. former ballast.42W uses an electronic high As frequency ballast, Ballasts mounted on Features removable power tray with tool-less latch Housing —Die-east single piece aluminum and have positive locking disconnect with nominal Ya"wall thickness. Integral Plugs. Ballasts are copper wound and arm provides easy installation to pole or 100% factory tested. wall. Housing completely sealed against Finish—Standard finish is dark bronze(DDBI moisture or environmental contaminants, polyester powder finish, Other architec- tural colors available, Door Assembly—Die-cast door frame,im- pact-resistant, tempered, glass lens, 3/16" Socket— Porcelain, medium-base socket thick, fully sealed with one-piece tubular for AS1, mogul-base socket for AS2,with silicone gasket. Tool-less entry and clo- copper alloy nickel-plated screw shell and l sure via spring loaded die-cast latches. center contact. UL listed. 1 Optics — Anodized segmented reflectors Listings--US Patent no. D447,590.UL List- forsuperior uniformity and control.Reflec- ed (standard). CSA Certified or NOM cer- 1 1 fors attach with root-less fasteners and tified (see options). Canadian patents are rotatable and interchangeable, pending. UL listed for wet locations, IP f Installation --- Heavy duty mounting block certified. Meets IESNA full cutoff criteria. t attaches to pole or wall to provide ease of t For product details and performance data,see the OUTDOOR installation as well as ensured alignment 1 binder or the on-line catalog at wwivrithonia.com_ and leveling. ringlnformation Example; AS1 150S SR2 120 SF LPI I ^signation Distribution Voltage Mountings Options/Accessories zssure Sodium SR2 Segmented Type II 120,2083,2403,277. Included Installed 35S Hi 50S roadway 347,4603,TB4 SPA Square pole mounting SF Single fuse, 120,Z77,347V(n/a TB)� 70S SR3 Segmented Type III RPA Round {tole mounting OF Double fuse,208,240,480V(nla TB)i INSasymme€ric WBA wall bracket (up or PER NEMA twist-lock receptacle only 150S SR4SC Segmented Type IV down) (no photocontrol) 200S forward throw, Shipped separately ORS Quartz restrike system (1o0W max. 250S sharp cutoff AS I,250W max.AS2,lamp not fSv 400S SR4W Segmented Type IV ASKMAI Mast arm adapler(Sire1} includedl Wa TRT)6 {allde wide, forward throw ASKMA2 Mast arm adapter(Size2l CR Corrosion-resistant finish 50M isize 2 only) Addi0onal mounting and accessories HS House-side shield 70M SR5S Segmented Type V avaitahle,consult rectory EC Emergency circuit' 100M square TP Tamperproot 150M SCWA Super CWA Pulse Start Ballast (not 175M NOTes: Drilling Pattern w available with HPS,TRT or 50m- 200 t I Must be ordered with SCWA option. (see pole ordering pg. 358j 175m) 250MI 2 May befactordwithSCWAyinCa. DM19-AS I at9o° LPI Lamp included (standard) 32t]Ml 3 Consult factoryfor availabilityinCanada. L/LP Less lamp 350M1 4 Optionalmulti-tapballastn20,208,240,277V;120,2", DM28-AS 2 at 180° p 2 347VinCanada). DM29-AS 2 at go* CSA CSA Certified 400M 5 Mounting kit standard. DM39-AS 3 at 9ff° NOW NOM Certified ( FluoreSCent 6 SF,OF or ORS options cannot be ordered together. ° For optional architectural colors,see page34s. 7 Consult factory for avai DM49-AS 4at90 42v RT DM32-AS 3 at 120°(Roltnd Shipped separately only) poles only) PEi NEMA twist-lock PE(120,208,24OV) PE3 NEMA twist-lock PE{347V} PE4 NEMA twist-lock PE(48OV) Dimensions are shown in inches icentimelersl unless otherwise noted. PE7 NEMA twist-lock PE(277V) AS1 AS2 SC Shorting cap Din Length 21.W 21 AS1VG Vandal guard (Size 1) oth Width 12,5' 16.25" AS2VG Vandal guard (Size 2) L Height 6.28. 825" For lenon sliplitters,consult factory. s r: M Outdoor Lighting PSG' /AL/Th/ON/A L1j7Hr1,va /A ling Mounted Mini Wall-Pales, P01ycarbonte Refractor J Intended Use er factor standard. HPS: Reactor normal NA power factor standard, HPF available. UL For entrances, stairwells, corridors and listed. Electrical components are mount- FtrUr® other pedestrian areas, ed to the cast aluminum housing,prompt ing maximum heat dissipation, ,For 50 31 Features hertz availability consult factory). Housing — Rear dousing is rugged, die- Installation — Top 1/2' threaded wiring ac- cast aluminum. Corrosion-resistant, cap- cess. Back access through 3/4" opening. Live external hardware includes slotted For feed-thru wiring, use condulet tee(not hex-head and tamperproof fasteners. Fin- included). Mount on any flat, non-com- ish is dark bronze thermoset polyester bustible vertical Surface. Photocell is powder, electrostatically applied. field installable. Optics — Front housing and refractor are Socket—HID is porcelain,horizontally ori- one-piece, injection-molded, UV-stabi- ented, medium-base socket with capper lized polycarbonate, High-performance alloy, nickel-plated screw shell and con- optical system consists of specular anod- ter contact. UL listed 66OW, 600V and 4KV ized segmented reflector and computer- pulse rated. } designed prism pattern. Standard finish Listings:, r.,,_ �- UL Listed (standard). CSA or -;T is dark bronze polyester enamel. Refrac- NOM Certified (see Options). UL listed for for sealed with one-piece, high-tempera wet locations. IP65 rated in accordance tune silicone gasket to inhibit entrance of F outside contaminants. with IEC standard 529. Lamp — Medium-base lamp Included. for product details and perlormance data,see the OUTDOOR ' Ballast— MH: High-reactance, high-pow border or the on-line Catalog at cvn•nalirhonlatom. ', ring Information Example: TWA 100M 120 LPI -- r S DR L Designation Voltage Options/Accessories Lamp { 'ressure Sodium 120 Installed Architectural Colors loptional LP1 Lamp 3551 2083 SF Single lose(120,277,347V)' 9 DNA Natural aluminum included as 50S2 2403 bF Double fuse (208, 2401' UBL Black standard 7OS2 lops, 277 EC Emergency circuit7.8 DMB: Medium bronze ,,elide 347 QRS Quartz restrike system7,' DWH White ' 50m, TB4 CR Corrosion-resistant finish (rear CSA CSA Certified 70M housing only) NOM NOM Certified (consult loom CRT Corrosion-resistantteflonfinWs factory) Irear housing only)9 PE Photocell (button type)' L/LP Loss lamp isrdP�is standard,2 0 812 4 0/2 7 713 4 7 and TI3 are High XHP High power factor ballast IHPS ice HiOh Power Factor. .t0i factory for availability in Canada only) .,.1Il,nulli taphallasl(120,208.240,277V;120,277,347V "'a' Lamp/Fixture/Ballast Data ante.n 120,277,or 347V only. seadab le with mu It i-tap ball ast. Accessories (Order separately) Weight .netincluded. Wattage Ballast Lbs. Kg. I,-lamp wanage not 10 exceed hallasiwattage RKi PE61 Photoelectric control kit, 120V High Pressure Sodium IMed/Clear) �r.,,stsonly. RK1 PE82 Photoelectric control kit, 277V 35 RNP 11 5 Iluorescent lamps included with luminaire. RK1 PE133 CSA Photoelectric control kit, 347V 50 RNP 11 5 TWAWG Wireguard 50 XHP 31 5 70 RNP 11 5 100 RNP 1t 5 Metal Halide — �— 50 XHP .4 4 6 1 70 XHP 4 6-4 Dimensions are shown in inches(centimetersf unless 100 XHP 14 6,4 H otherwise noted, TWA Height 10125.41 Width 29. .t Depth 6 11-hE 1'�h615.2) '.. Maxweigh, 14lbs16.4kgl W D Outdoor Lighting PSG7 fA L/THVNIA L/GHT/NG Fo Lighting Architectural Arm-Mounted Cutoff TM rsIntended Use Electrical— 15OW and below utilize a high reactance, high power factor. 175W and For streets, walkways, parking lots and above use a constant-wattage autotrans- surrounding areas. former ballast.42W uses an electronic high frequency ballast. Ballasts mounted on Features removable power tray with tool-less latch Housing —Die-cast single piece aluminum and have positive locking disconnect with nominal Ve"wall thickness. Integral plugs. Ballasts are copper wound and arm provides easy installation to pole or 100/o factory tested. wall. Housing completely sealed against Finish—Standard finish is dark bronze(DDB) moisture or environmental contaminants. polyester powder finish. Other architec- ff( fil i W tural colors available. Door Assembly—Die-cast door frame,im- pact-resistant, tempered, glass lens, 3/t5" Socket— Porcelain, medium-base Socket thick, fully sealed with one-piece tubular for AS1, mogul-base socket for AS2,with silicone gasket. Tool-less entry and clo- copper alloy nickel-plated screwshell and 1 sure via spring loaded die-cast latches. center contact. UL listed, f Optics — Anodized segmented reflectors Listings—US Patent no.D447,590.UL List- for superior uniformity and control.Reflec- ed (standard). CSA Certified or NOM cer- t tors attach with tool-less fasteners and tified (see optionsl. Canadian patents are rotatable and interchangeable, pending. UL listed for wet locations. IP f Installation — Heavy duty mounting block certified. Meets IESNA full cutoff criteria. t t attaches to pole or wall to provide ease of Installation as well as ensured alignment for product details and performance data,see the oUTD06R f g binder or the on-line catalog at wsysv.f+lhonia.com. r and leveling. t ritlg Information Example: AS1 150S SR2120 SF LPI a gnation Distribution Voltage Mountings OptionslAccessaries ensure Sodium SR2 Segmented Type If 120,2001,2401,277, Included Installed N 35S roadway 347,4803,TB^ SPA Square pole mounting SF Single fuse, 120,277,347V(n/a TB)5 505 SR3 Segmented Type III RPA Round pole mounting DF Double fuse, 208, 240,480V Wa TV 05 asymmetric 1 PER NEMA twist-lock receptacle only 00S WBA wall bracket (up or p y 150S SR4SC Segmented Type 1V down) (no photocontrol) 200S forward throw, Shipped separately QRS Quartz restrike system (100W max. 250S sharp cutoff AS),25OW max.AS2,lamp not M 400S SR4W Segmented Type IV ASKMAI Mast arm adaplar(Sireti included), In/a TRT)5 alido wide, forward throw ASKMA2 Mast arm adapter(Size21 CH Corrosion-resistant finish 50M (size 2 only) Additional mounting and accessories HS House-side shield 7OM SR5S Segmented Type V available,consult factory EC Emergency circuit? loom square TP Tamperproof 150M P SCWA Super CWA Pulse Start Ballast (not 175M MOTES: Drilling Pattern available with HPS, TRT or 50m- 200M1 i Must be ordered with SCWA option, (see pole ordering pg. 358) 175m) Z50M2 2 May be ordered with SCWA opt ion. DM19 AS 1 a130° LPI Lamp included (standard) 32CMf 3 ConsulllaclorylntavailabililyinCanada. i/LP LESS lam 4 O tionalmullilapballas1fi20,208,240,277V;120,277, DM28-AS 2 at 180° p 35t1M1 3 7VinCanadal. DM29-AS 2 at 90° CSA CSA Certified 403W 5 Mounting kit standard. DM39 AS 3 at 90° NOW NOM Certified t_FIUDrescenl 6 SF,AFor ORS options cannot be ordered togeiher. Foroptional architectural coloss,see page 349. 7 Consult facloryloravailability. DM49-AS 4 at 90 ° azTRT DM32-AS 3 at 120* (Round Shipped separately a7!'nnlyl stoles only) PE1 NEMA twist-lock PE()20,208,240V) PE3 NEMA twist-lack PE(347V) f E4 NEMA twist-lock PE 1480V) Dimensions are shown in inches(centimeters}unless otherwise noted. PE7 NEMA twist-lock PE (277V) SD Shorting cap asr asz l7ir AS1VG Vandal guard (Size 11 oil Length 27.3a' 2S jrr_�� Width 12.5' 16.25, AS2VG Vandal guard (Size 2) L Height 6.2B' E.25' For tenon sliphtters,consusl Jaunty. f h Outdoor Lighting PSG7 /A L1rHON/A L%CHrlva /I =f Round Straight Aluminum Anchor Base Poles RSA Intended Use by continuous circumferential welds at Hardware-Stainless steel. both top and bottom of anchor base to for 4-1/2" O.D., 8-foot to 25-foot mounting provide maximum strength at area of criti Tap Cap Cast aluminum cap is provided height. Accepts KKR Series fixtures (PT). cal stress. for drill-mount poles. Features Anchor Bolts - Tap 12" is galvanized per Finish- Standard finish is brushed alumi ASTM A-153.Made of carbon steel barwith num. Optional polyester powder paint and Shaft--One-piece extruded 6063-T6 alumi- a minimum-yield strength of 55,000 psi, anodized finishes available. num alloy with T6 temper. Circumferential Bolt Covers - A356 out covers included satin-brushed finish. 41/2" round straight Grounding - Ground lug located immedi with anchor base unless otherwise s oci tube is uniform in cross-section down length ately inside handhole is tapped for 3/8"-16 p of shaft. UNC ground bolt (not supplied). fled. Anchor Base - Cast from A356 aluminum Handhole - Reinforced 3"x5" handhole is alloy and heat treated to T6 temper. Base located 18"above base.Cover and attach- For produce details and pedormance data,see the ournooft slipfits shaft, and they are joined together ment hardware furnished, hinder or the on-line catalog at fvwnv.Alhowa.com Technical Information Ordering Information: See page 35B EPA 00 with 13 gust INote:Poles are available only in U.S.) Nam, Pole Wall Sol[ B01t Approx. Catalog mount. Shaft Size Thick, 80 90 too Max. Circle Size ship wt. INSTALLATION NOTES: 6lumber III. !€. in.x in.x I inj mph mph mph wt. in. in,x in,x inj (lbsJ Installation requires grout to be packed under base to ensura ASA 84C 8 4.0x8.0 0.125 11.2 8-6 6.8 125 6.112-8.114 314x18x3 22 fultcoaeaclwilhfowldation.Factory-suppliedtemplatesmust ASA 84-5C 8 4.5 x 8.0 0.125 14.6 11.3 9.1 175 7-118-8.3M 314 x 18 x 3 30 be used when selling anchor bolts.Liehunia Lighting will 1141 RSA84-SG 8 4.5x8.0 0.1B8 21.8 17.0 13.7 225 7-1/8.8.3/8 314x18x3 38 accepiclaimforincorrecl anchorage ptacemen[dlletOfaflme RSA 10 4C 10 4,0 x 10.0 0.125 9.2 6.1 4.7 100 6.1/2.8.1/4 3/4 x 18 x 3 26 to use Lithonia Lighting factory templates. RSA 104-5C 10 4.5 x 10.0 0.125 10.6 3.1 6.5 133 7-118.8.318 314 x 180 3 34 Do not erect poles without having fixtures installed. RSA 104.513 10 4.5 x 10.0 0.188 16.3 12.6 10.1 175 7.118.8.318 314 x 180 3 43 If poles are slored outside,all protective wrapping muss be ASA 105C 10 5.0x10,0 0A25 13-6 10.6 8,5 150 1-112.9.112 314x19x3 36 removed immediately to prevent finish damage. BSA 124C 12 4.0x12,0 0.125 6.0 4.3 12 110 6.1/2.8-1f4 314x18x3 30 RSA 124.5C 12 4.5 x 12.0 0.125 8.1 6.0 4S 80 7.118-8-318 314 x 18 x 3 36 ASA 12 4.5G 12 4.5 x I2'o 0.188 12.7 9.7 7,1 185 7-1/8.8.3/8 314 x 18 x 3 50 RSA 12 5c 12 5.0 x 12.0 0.125 10.3 B.0 6,3 150 7.1/2-9.112 314 x 18 x 3 36 A A 12 5E 12 5.0 x 12.0 0.156 132 10.3 8,2 200 7-112-9-112 3/4 x 18 x 3 44 R 12 5.0x 12.0 0.188 16.2 12.6 10.1 225 7.112-9-112 314x 180 53 RS 14 4.0x14.0 0.125 4.1 2,8 1.9 75 6•1128114 3/4x180 35 RSA 144.5C 14 4.5 x 14.0 O 125 5,8 4.2 3-3 60 7-I/8.8-318 314 x 1130 42 ASA 144.5G 14 4.5x14.0 0.188 97 7.3 5.9 190 7-118.8-318 3/4x18x3 56 _r BSA 145C 14 5.0x14.0 0.125 7.8 6.0 4.7 100 7-112-9.1/2 314x18x3 39 RSA 14 5E 14 5.0 x 14.0 0.156 10,3 8,0 6.3 125 7-1/2.9.1/2 314 x 18 x 3 47 BSA 145G 14 5.0x14.0 0.188 12,8 99 7.9 150 7-112.9-112 314x18x3 56 ti RSA 164C 16 4.0 x I6.0 0.125 2.8 1.6 1.0 150 6-112-8-112 314 x 18 x 3 38 - -- BSA 164.5C 16 4,5 x 16,0 0.125 4.2 2.8 2.t 50 7.118-8 3]8 314 x 18 x 3 46 ASA 164.5G 15 4.5 x 16.0 0.188 7.5 5.5 4.3 155 7.118-8-3/8 314 x€8 x 3 62 C 78" RSA165C 16 5.0x16,0 0.125 5.9 4.4 3.4 175 7.112-9-112 314x18x3 46 RSA 16 SE 16 5.0x16.0 0,156 8.0 6.1 4.8 190 7-1/2.9.112 3/4x18x3 53 BSA 165G 16 5.0x16.0 0.188 10.1 7.8 6.1 200 7.112-9112 314x18x3 60 RSA 166E 16 6.0x16.0 0.156 13.6 10.6 8.4 225 8.314-10-114 3/4x30x3 53 BSA 166G 16 6.0x16.0 0.198 16,6 13.0 10.4 245 8-314-10.114 314x30x3 78 ASA 184.5G 18 4.5x 18.0 0.188 5.7 4.0 3,1 123 7.118.8-318 314x 18x3 68 ASA 18SC 18 5.0x18.0 0.125 43 3.1 2.4 150 7-1/2.9.1/2 314x180 48 BSA 18 5E 18 5.0X18.0 0.156 6,1 4,6 3.5 115 7.112-9-112 3/4x180 58 BSA 185G 18 5.Ox18.0 OA88 8.0 6,8 4.7 225 7-112-9-112 314xISx3 68 BSA IS6G 18 6,ox18.o 0.188 13.9 10.7 0.5 225 8-3/4.10-114 314x30x3 86 B BSA 204.5G 20 4.5 x 20.0 0,188 4.3 2.9 2.1 95 7.1/8.8-318 314 x i8 x 3 74 RSA 20 5C 20 5.0 x 20.0 0,125 3.0 2.1 1.5 150 7-112.9.1/2 314 x 18 x 3 54 RSA205E 20 5.0x20LO 0.156 4.7 3.4 2.6 150 7.112.9.1/2 314x18x3 68 2 5 20 5.0x20.0 0.188 6.4 4.8 3.6 150 7.112.9.112 314x18x3 82 RSA 20 6.0 x 20.0 0.156 9.3 1.1 5,5 175 8-314-10.114 314 x 30 x 3 95 BSA 20 6G 20 6.0 x 20.0 0.188 11.6 9.1 7.1 200 $-3/4-10.114 314 x 30 x 3 110 RSA254.513 25 4.5x25.0 0.188 1.3 - --- 100 7-118.8.318 314x19x3 89 �,;✓y<..`:r:- . BSA 25 BE 25 6.0x25.0 0.156 5,7 3.9 2.8 150 8.3/4-10.114 3/4x30x3 108 RSA256G 25 6.0x 25.0 0.188 7.1 5,3 4.0 150 8.314-10.114 3/4 x 30 x 3 128 RSA 3066 30 6.000.0 30.0 0.188 3.5 1 2.4 1.6 200 8.314.10.1/4 314 x 30 x 3 146 Pole Data Shaft Bolt Bolt Base Anchor Warehouse NOTES: Base circle projection square Boit Anchor Bolt Template 1 Mounting Arrangement:fPT)Open Top;IT20I2-318"0.0 size A B C description description number WNPSI 4' S•112"-8 3I4" 3.114" 8314" ABRSA-4 A618.0 P150057 2 Drillat ounting:IDM1911 fixture at13V;tDM2a12fixlvres 4-112" 7-1/8 8-3I8" 3-1/4` 8-112" ABRSA-4.5 AB18.0 PJ50040 3 Options:Seepage369. 5" 7-1/2"-9-112" 3-1/4- 9-114" ABRSA-5 AB 18-0 PJ50058 a Brackets:Seepage370. 6" 8.314"-10-114" 3-1/2' 10-114` ABRSA-6 AB30-0 PJ50059 (AL1THL7A(1AL/GHT//VG PS67 Outdoor Lighting 359 24 03 10 : 49a Schofield Brothers 5088791737 p. 3 e 3F C The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the CommonNvcaltll Massachusetts Historical Commission January 21, 2003 Bridcett Nowd Schofield Brothers of New England 1071 Worcester Road Framingham, MA 01701-5298 RE: Foster Farm Elementary School, North Andover, MHC#RC.32212 Dear lets. Nov.•d: Thank you for submitting a Project Notification Form to the Massachusetts Historical Commission regarding the proposed project referenced above, Staff of the MHC have reviewed tite information you submitted and have the following comments. This letter is intended to clarify and correct MHC's letter of January 13, 2003, which contained an error in the description of the project. MHC understands that the project involves the construction of a new school building on undeveloped land. Review of MHC's Inventory of the Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth indicates that there are no historic or archaeological properties within the project area. After review of MHC's files and the information you submitted, MHC staff have determined that the proposed project is unlikely to affect significant historic or archaeological resources. No further MHC review is required for this project in con3pliance with Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 9, Sections 26-27C (950 CivIR 71), If you have any questions concerning this review, please feel free to contact me at this office. Sincerely, Eric S. John n Archaeologist/Preservation Planner Massachusetts Historical Commission xc: Christine Lynch, SBAB North Andover Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, Massachusetts 02125 (G 17) 727-8470• Fax: (G 17) 727-5128 W"rmstate.ma.us/scc/rnhc O2- `Svc//Sri-1,41 ✓�?� , oT���2zS i i I i NORTH ANDOVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS 3 NORTH 16, LAKcµ� cotrriCt!EwoCK 4ATE a CHUS� Study New 1 ,, 5 S Preliminary- Draft CCan:u:ary:8, 1998 I TABLE OF CONTENTS FOSTER FARM 1. Site Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. Soil Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Ill. Vehicular Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 IV. Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 SMOLAK FARM 1. Site Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 11. Soil Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Ili. Vehicular Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 IV. Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . 4 STATE FOREST I. Site Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 11. Soil Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S Covenantsand Restrictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 EXHIBITS Smofak Farm Preliminary Site Study _. Smolak Farm Preliminary Soils Analysis State Forest Preliminary Site Study State Forest Preliminary Solis Analysis Foster Farm Preliminary Site Study Foster Farm Preliminary Soils Analysis Foster Farm Preliminary Elem. School Site Plan Educational Specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Preliminary Project Cost Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 EXHIBITS New School Proposed Main Level Floor Plan New School Proposed Lower Level Floor Plan i Foster Farfrz I. SITE ANALYSIS A. Existing Conditions: The"Foster Farm Site" is a portion of a collection of smaller parcels known by various names and held collectively as "The Foster Trust" established in May of 1985 by Earl L. and Beatrice N. Foster of North Andover, The land considered by this study is approximately 77 acres in total and is bordered on the north by Foster Street, as well as some small residential out- pieces; on the east by a power line right-of-way; on the south by Boxford Street, as well as some small residential out-pieces; and on the west by various private properties. The topography of the site is picturesque featuring rolling hills, an active stream, a pond, and vegetated wetlands. Most of the western portion of the site is clear and has been used for many years as farming and pasture land. The eastern portion of the site (to the east of the wetlands) is the most hilly and has remained treed. B. Analysis: This picturesque site offers numerous opportunities for development of buildings, recreational outdoor areas,play fields, and open space. It is recommended that all of the area to the east of the wetlands and stream remain undeveloped, thus providing continuous open space up to and beyond the power line right-of-way. The western area of the site provides ample area for the development of a±80,000 square foot school facility with its related parking and play fields, which maintains the pastoral character of the area. II. ,SOIL CHARACTERISTICS A, Existing Conditions: The site contains various soil types that can be broken down to five major categories: Canton soils - very to extremely stony fine sand loam on moderate to steep slopes; Hinkley, Soils - sandy loam on gently to moderate slopes; Wetland Soils including Scarboro mucky, fine, sandy loam, and shallow and deep Medisaprists which are very poorly drained deposits of organic material; Charlton-Rock outcrop - Hollis complex - very rocky and moderately to steeply sloping areas; and Sudbury fine sandy loam - a deep and gently sloping soil suitable for trees as well as woodland and open land wildlife habitats. The eastern portion of the site consists of generally Canton and Charlton soils with some deep Medisaprists at or near its northern edge at Foster Street. The western portion of the site consists mostly of Hinkley soils'with some Charlton soils at the far easterly end separated from the Hinkley soil by a narrow Hount Vernon Group, Inc. Architects& Planners Page 1 i Foster Farsn wetland area of deep Medisaprists running generally southwest to northeast. Analysis: Soils analysis support and confirm the topographic analysis to leave the easterly end of the site as underdeveloped open land and restrict all site development to the westerly end of the site. III. VEHICULAR ACCESS A. Existing Conditions: The site is located in the Northeastern part of North Andover between Foster Street to the north and Boxford Street to the south, both of which cover a few hundred yards to the east at the intersection of Salem Street which provides access easterly to the center of Town, Numerous residential developments, mostly on cul-de-sacs, feed these roads. B. Analysis: The site is located in a developing area of Town and enjoys the advantage of being bordered by two secondary roads. Although preliminary concept plans show access from Boxford Street, additional access from Foster Street would be desirable. IV. UTILITIES A. Existing Conditions: Water and electrical utilities exist on both Foster Street and Boxford Street. No natural gas service is available on Foster Street, but Bay State gas does provide natural gas to Boxford Street. Sewerage disposal in this area is handled by on-site systems. There is town sewer available on Salem Street terminating just west of the intersection of Fuller Road, approximately 2,500 feet from the northwesterly corner of the site on Foster Street and approximately 3,000 feet from the southwesterly corner of the site on Boxford Street. B. Analysis: The availability of most utilities to the site is conducive to the development of this site for a school building project. The relatively close proximity of Town sewer is a very positive feature in that, although the Hinkley soils on the site can facilitate an appropriately designed on-site sewage disposal system, the installation of a sewer connection could present an affordable alternative to the installation of on-site sewage disposal and its associated maintenance. Alonni Vernon Group, Iirc, —A rchitects&Planners Page 2 r yJ - t- ! `�Or�l 5 l�� Ui ['t'►=.y`� I� oriece & Gary , Inc . Landscape Architecture Site Planning Urban Design Dr June 10,2002 Paul Szymanski,Business Manager North Andover School Department North Andover,Massachusetts Re: Proposed Foster Farm School Site Dear Mr. Szymanski: We are pleased to submit the final report on the feasibility of utilizing the designated Town-owned property, "Faster Farm Site"on Boxford Street for an elementary school of approximately 800 students.The following is a summary of the attached specialized studies for the indicated site criteria by the reporting professional consultant: Geotechnieal Report-Professional Services Industries(PSI) The geotechnical firm, PSI,has completed a subsurface exploration program at the site consisting in part of excavated test pits and has determine that the sandy soils are suitable to support conventional shallow footing foundations for a school building. Site Utility Assessment-GEOD Consulting GEOD Consulting investigated the availability and capacity of utilities for the subject project. There is an 8" existing sanitary sewer approximately 3800 feet from the proposed school site which most likely has the capacity to receive the school sewage.There is a 12"water line in Boxford Street with anticipated capacity for the school. As Boxford Street does not have a closed drainage system, stormwater runoff generated within the school site would be treated and disposed of on site.There is a 6"High pressure gas main and both electric and telephone services are available to the site. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment-Simmons Environmental Services Based upon the limited prior uses of this property as grazing land,the results of the soil analysis,review of federal and state environmental agency records, SIMMONS concludes that the property poses minimal risk of environmental liability associated with prior oil and/or hazardous material releases. Traffic Impact Study-Bruce Campbell&Associates According to the traffic impact study prepared by Bruce Campbell&Associates,a driveway from Boxford Street to the school site ran be designed to provide safe sight distances. It is recommended that Boxford Street be widen in the site area an additional 4-6 fee to include I 1-12 foot lanes,and 2 foot wide shoulders for safer travel in this section. Also upgrading the drainage and lighting in the area is recommended. The tragic analysis of offsite intersections indicate that with the school,the nearby intersections will continue to operate at satisfactory levels of service(LOS)at A,B and C with northbound approach on Salem Street continuing to operate at a low level of service—F. Wetlands-Wetland Preservation(WPI) Wetland Preservation Inc. (WPI) identified and flagged the wetlands and Christiansen & Sergi, surveyors have surveyed and prepared a plan of the wetland flag locations denoting the buffer zones as prescribed by the North Andover Conservation Commission. WPI has prepared and filed an ANRAD, Abbreviated Notice of Resource Area Determination,with the North Andover Conservation Commission as well. A vernal pool was previously identified on the west side of the site which requires a no disturb zone of 50' and no build zone of 75'. On the north and west sides of the site,as no vernal pool was found,the respective buffers at 25'and 50'. In summary, an elementary school, with driveway, parking and play areas can be built on the site. Given the wetland buffers, there are approximately 10 buildable acres out side the no-disturbance zones. The sewer will have to be extended to the site and some roadway improvements are required to make vehicular access along Boxford Street safe Sincerely, Ben Crary, Landscape Architect 56 Roland Street Tel. (617) 776-7600 Charlestown, MA 02129 Email: MG ma.ultranet.com Eax.(617) 776-1075 0 � O 7 A � C ABUTTER LIST �o ° �m 4 SU6JC-CTPROPERTY: FOSTER FATtMS LOCATI`DON SQXF:OR S1'6E-FT 1N NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSFT7S a PARCEL�110AIII� — TEnttl�[3 38 Ar doves c1a School Cammittt3e t7.O Men Street __ _.. —_�-ji n U) u� CL 0 U) AFlUT"TERS: __ - -- — — ---- to n it74I1 _ 58 Nl arrnan�ind.la oelinaTardir e 252 boxlord Street - n o \ '04D 4 Tumi of Hord(Andover ran Conservalio�n COMMissrorn 27 Charles Street _ .--- \ INN _ 4.2 ueor and Juiin Finn 193 Fusfsr Streit- _ - o M w _ 41 Fs w Hill Farm Trust(Glaine€3.Finbu Trust) 160 Foster Street ro 1fi4D '1C4D 39 FA& Re:JI TYUst Kerrneth C.Undauer,Trust 160 Foster Street ' r� dL 7hn n�c anri DoriR Cmmnns -_ 15 FQSWr Sltuei -'.` u h 4 t04f3 37 A honse and May Elietavich � __ 101 Fy�ier Street a z � 104� 59 E3s cndra anti Anita Gohel _ _ ---- 94 13axfard Streit _- o � a prlp 36 -' 2MHQca Fare lain ocable Trust fNll is haet A. Caaa ne Ti t jsJL go Erid a Sheet,Salem-MA 0979 n .. 104p 64 PafriCia and Pau!Passariello 122 Boxiord Slreot_. � `D ro 104D 56 Carat A. Elliot and John A.Lozier __ 200 Roxford Street — Ln u I pot} 57 _ Peter and Pamela Kiever 220 8o:tord Skeet _ Q 104D 40� M&M Really Tnist(Kenneth F.Undauer.T ruSt; 160 Foster Street m l 67 Fustor Stroet 104D 45 Virt'lio and Jeane Gil tll I 0qD 53 Thrums Jr.and Joan Baird _ l5 Fester Street_ N t04D 35 ;Stephen and Kathteen Co s 76 Boxforo Street 104D 26 atevena.Young I12Foster51raat 104D 143 Ftsster Streol Renal Trust(Kenneth E.Unoauer) 60 Fouler 51raET —� W s 04D 25 Briar Hill Farm Trust ElainC B.f�nhu 7rttst' -- 150 Faslrs S1rF,et © o 1040 23 FoE3 cr Strccf Roal 7n;st Kenneth E.Undauet�� 160 t astir Streetm IG4D fib Catliwino and Steven Hurst _ 202 Faster Street ,� w I ND 65 Alan and Diane Bauer � _ _ --- 116 Foster Street 1 G41D 67 Orit and Jefty Gcidstein_ 224 Foster Street tG4D 24 Steven S.Young— {t2 Foster Strecrt w ua 105A 2 Thomas and f7eborah Gtean 26i 6oxtofd Street ^� MA 3 Brian and Sharon Holland 257 Boxford Sircel — o 1G&A 1251 --!Carol J Ro rs 245 le oxford Suter 1 GSA 252 Steven And Lisa Marshall 2J3 Boxford Street l 106A 253 Fticharo and ODrothyVarga _ 22.S F oiRarci b l b Onto. 6 of Assess Nortt Ando r NOTE:A more legible copy of the Abutter List follows this certified copy- Al 3 � a a PAGE 202 az 0 a St3i3JECT PIWE"TY: FOSTER FARMS LOCATED ON 13OKFOR€1 STREET IN t+>OP'H A MA ACH J,SEfTS -- am 4� NIAP PAFtGEI. NAN1B ADDRiS 1447 38 Town of Norih ArxiUver Ut)School Committee 1120 limn Streel — -L am p7 Ln 8 UTrEFS. lfd Stret 10 254 &ad and Julie own o Ln 0 1 D6A 256 James W and Lisa Wlmiaw 20713oxfcrd Street r3 0 3 .106A 256 John and Helen Gorman - 203 Bnxford Street a 1l}6A 257 ,3a1Tr�arsd Atyson Katz 151 Boxlord GxBet 0 l -,rpn — 106A 35__ James and Nancy�Letuurrwao 193 Boxford Street __rn fu 106A 86 _ Kerx�elh and Elizabeth Mrx [ 169 Boxford SirrAt ZOSA0 '^-- ;!5 aR[nSr r�; nQ11. 6 Rir;e Ayonue.Medtard.MA 1T2155 11 .6A R 8 J.. 40 Sunset Rcck.Andover,MA 01810 E tv t 0 _ 1 l=arru� Trust RoberE Jarr€isz.Trust 10gg 17 Jahn and Kathleen Aralsh 352 Foster Sheol Ct 104B 166 Judith Kenn 30 vest Way -- - 3 104E 28 i New England Power.Pr erVcs Oe artmenr 25 Reseauch Arivu.Weslt>Jro-MA 015fl2 n w m 1048 145 Peter and Carol Woo 29 Bam lane t04B 146 Hov or III Trust — - 30 Barro Lane 104$ 29 New E Ian Powal,Propemes AeparlmenI — _ 25 Nisearch give.Westboro.MA 01582 1 4B 2 Vishnu and DO Shah 300 krsler Street w 104F3 20 Barth and Sronda.Ierroko 312 faster Street J 1048 21 _Kith and Eizabeth Sa" S faster Street H 104E 22 Stephen and Linda Bonrrter NO Foster 6teat 104E --' 49 A[ib"and Kelley Papa 304 uoxlord Street a 3t2 F5oxlOrd Slreal m rn 104E -- - 59 Rowt and D�ebarah Trask ---- -- M 1048 13 Janand Susan Kessler 320 Boxtord Streal -4 m 104EI 30 New ErViand Power,Pro erlies Department 25 Rsseatatr DrtvP,Wes?bola,MA 015t3? ca cc WUd b 0 � r8 f Assessor Oh And er yob -a - - - -- - .... -_---- .....-..... - --- ABUTTER LIST SUBJECT PROPERTY: FOSTER FARMS LOCATED ON BOXFORD STREET IN NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS 0 t 1?L4 S MAP IPARCEL#INAME JADDRESS 104D 38 Town of North Andover c/o School Committee 1120MainStreet ABUTTERS: 104D 58 Norman and Jacqueline Tardine 252 Boxford Street . 104D 43 Town of North Andover c/o Conservation Commission 27 Charles Street 104D 42 George and Julie Finn 193 Foster Street 104D 41 Briar Hill Farm Trust Elaine B. Finbury Trust) 160 Foster Street 1040 39 M & M Reap Trust Kenneth E. Lindauer, Trust) 160 Foster Street 104D 44 Thomas and Doris Emmons 135 Foster Street 104D 37 Alphonse and Mary Bielevich 101 Foster Street 104D 59 Ra"endra and Anita Gohel 94 Boxford Street 104D 36 Cam a na Family Irrevocable Trust Michael A. Cam a ne Trust) 90 Bridge Street, Salem, MA 03079 104D 60 Patricia and Paul Passariello 122 Boxford Street 104D 56 Carol A. Elliot and John A. Lozier 206 Boxford Street 104D 57 Peter and Pamela Kiever 220 Boxford Street 104D 40 M & M Realty Trust Kenneth E. Lindauer, Trust 160 Foster Street 104D 48 Vir ilio and Jeane Gi liotti 87 Foster Street 104D 53 Thomas Jr. and Joan Baird 75 Foster Street 104D 35 Stephen and Kathleen Borys 76 Boxford Street 104D 26 Steven B. Young 112 Foster Street 104D 144 Foster Street Realty Trust Kenneth E. Lindauer 160 Foster Street 104D 25 Briar Hill Farm Trust Elaine B. Finbury Trust) 160 Foster Street 104D 23 Foster Street Realt Trust Kenneth E. Lindauer) 160 Foster Street 104D 66 Catherine and Steven Hurst 202 Foster Street 104D 65 Alan and Diane Bauer 216 Foster Street 104D 67 Orit and Jeffrey Goldstein 224 Foster Street 104D 24 Steven B. Young 112 Foster Street 106A 2 Thomas and Deborah Green 267 Boxford Street 106A 3 Brian and Sharon Holland 257 Boxford Street 106A 251 Carol J. Rogers 245 Boxford Street 106A 252 Steven and Lisa Marshall 233 Boxford Street 106A 253 Richard and Dorothy Varga 221 Boxford Street PAGE 2 of 2 SUBJECT PROPERTY: FOSTER FARMS LOCATED ON BOXFORD STREET IN NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS MAP PARCEL# NAME ADDRESS 104D 38 ITown of North Andover c/o School Committee 1120 Main Street ABUTTERS: 106A 254 Michael and Julie Cronin 211 Boxford Street 106A 255 James IV and Lisa Winslow 207 Boxford Street 106A 256 John and Helen Gorman 203 Boxford Street 106A 257 Jeffrey and Al son Kutz 151 Boxford Street 106A 85 James and Nancy Letourneau 193 Boxford Street 106A 86 Kenneth and Elizabeth Murphy 169 Boxford Street 106A 115 Ralph Giallanella 8 Rice Avenue, Medford, MA 02155 106A 1 R &J Family Trust (Robert Janosz, Trust) 40 Sunset Rock, Andover, MA 01810 1046 17 John and Kathleen Walsh 352 Foster Street 104E 166 Judith Kenney 30 Vest Way 104E 29 New En land Power, Properties Department 25 Research Drive, Westboro, MA 01582 104E 145 Peter and Carol We er 29 Barco Lane 104E 146 Hooper III Trust 30 Barco Lane 104E 29 New-England Power, Pro erties De artment 25 Research Drive, Westboro, MA 01582 104E 2 Vishnu and Di ti Shah 300 Foster Street 104E 120 Barth and Brenda Jerrold 312 Foster Street 1048 21 Kenneth and Elizabeth Sarni 326 Foster Street 104E 22 Ste hen and Linda Downer 340 Foster Street 104B 49 Anthonyand Kelley Papa 304 Boxford Street 104E 59 Robert and Deborah Trask 312 Boxford Street 104B 13 Jerg and Susan Kessler 320 Boxford Street 104B 30 New England Power, Properties Department 25 Research Drive, Westboro, MA 01582 0245 3.5 North Andover Foster Farm Planning Board Submission Checklist Production & Shipping Checklist FS=full-size •HS=half-size Planning Board set= (1) book and (1) set of plans (ATJ to produce all) ConComm set= (1) rubberbanded set of books and (1) set of stapled plans (supplied) Total Items Produced: (16) books (8) Traffic Appendix (4) sets FS (12) sets HS Distributed as follows: Justin Woods, Planning Director North Andover Planning Board 27 Charles Street North Andover, MA 01845 i (3) Planning Board sets FS ', • (7) sets HS ® (3) Conservation Commission FS O (2) Traffic Appendix 0 All supplied envelopes '... • Must receive the book with original signature pagesl ''.. Timothy McIntosh, Project Manager Vanasse Hange Brustlin, Inc. 101 Walnut Street Watertown, MA 02471-9151 0 (1) Planning Board set FS • (1) Conservation Commission FS • (1) Traffic Appendix Nancy Kurtz, School Building Committee c/o North Andover School Department 675 Chickering Road North Andover, MA 01845 • (1) Planning Board set HS O (1) Conservation Commission HS • (1) Traffic Appendix Paul Szymanski, Director of Management Support Services North Andover Public Schools 675 Chickering Road North Andover, MA 01845 • (1) Planning Board set HS • (1) Conservation Commission HS • (1) Traffic Appendix