Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-10-02 Drainage Analysis DEF SUB t � f DRAINAGE ANALYSIS TUCKER FARMS DEFINITIVE PLAN DRAINAGE ANALYSIS July 12 1984 k. The drainage analysis performed for this site utilizes the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) method to determine the runoff_ volumes and a computer model, which utilizes a unit hydrograph and a rainfall intensity pattern for a 24 hour storm (SCS type 11 storm) to develop runoff rates . The soils on site consist primarily of Hinckleys soils (Group A) with the wetlands areas being Whitman (Group D) . F There are two major drainage areas on the site. One flows to the West (Area 1) and one to the East (Area 2) . The division line between the two follows approximately the proposed road. Both flows eventually meet at a stream at the southern end of the site. Our approach to reducing the peak flow is to increase the time of concentraction (tc) and offset peaks rather than to use retention ponds.. The road drainage will leave the site quickly but the site drainage tc will be increased by the use of swales (see plan) . The result of this is to offset the peak flows of the paved area and the site drainage thereby reducing peak flows. The advantage of: this is that there aren't any retention ponds to become filled or to be futre hazards. All calculations use the 100 year storm, The attached sheets show that Area 1 which is 8.8 acres and flows to the west has a peak flow of 8.15 cfs. The proposed flow is 8.07 cfs. Area 2 is 9.8 acres and flows to the east, The existing peak flow is 6.1 cfs. The proposed peak will. be 6.17 cfs, These numbers are equal. when considering the assumptions made in the work. A detailed drainage analysis will be provided with the Notice of Intent. 1 Tucker Farms Drainage Analysis July 12 1984 Page 1 JAIE �� 1 L�K 'rf M (7 T I .2 0 0 6,6 .17 12.2 1.94 8,15\ 18.6 .04 .17 .4 .02 .os 6.8 .04 .17 12.4 .44 1.85 18.8 .04 .17 .6 .02 .08 7 .04 .17 12.6 .18 .76 19 A ..17 .8 .02 . a 7.2 .04 .17 12..8 .18 .76 19.2 JA .17 1 .02 .08 7.4 .a'+ .17 13 .18 .76 19.4 A .17 1.2 .02 .08 7.6 .04 .17 13.2 .18 .76 19.6 JA .17 1.4 .02 .oB 7.8 .04 .17 13.4 .09 .38 19.8 A .17 1 .6 .02 .08 8 .04 .17 13,6 .09 .38 20 .04 .17 1.8 .02 .C8 l 8.2 A .17 13.8 .09 .38 20.2 JA .17 2 .02. .08 8.4 .04 .17 14 .09 .38 20.4 .04 .17 2.2 .02 ,oB 8.6 JA .1.7 1 14.2 .W .38 20.6 .04 .17 2.4 .02 ,08 8.8 .04 .17 i 14.4 .04 .17 20.8 .04 .17 2.6 .02 ,C18 9 .04 .17 14.6 .04 .17 21 .04 .17 2.8 .02 ,e 9.2 .04 .17 14.8 ,04 ,17 21.2 .04 .17 3 .02 ,06 9.4 .07 .29 15 .04 .17 21.4 .02 .08 3.2 .02 ,08 9.6 .07 .29 15.2 .04 .17 21.6 .02 .03 3.4 .04 .17 ! 9.8 .07 .29 15.4 JA .17 1 21.8 .02 ,U3 3.6 .(A ,17 10' .07 .29 15.6 .04 .17 22 .02 .08 3.8 .04 .17 10.2 .01 .29 15.8 .04 .17 22.2 .02 .08 4 .(A .17 10.4 ,09 .38 16 .(A .17 22.4 .02 .03 4.2 ,M .17 1.0.6 .09 .38 16.2 .04 .17 22.6 .02 .08 4.4 .04 .17 10.8 .09 .38 16.4 .04 .17 22.8 .02 .03 4.6 .(A .17 11 .09 .38 16.6 .04 .17 23 .02 .03 4,8 .04 .17 11.2 .09 .38 16.8 .04 .17 23.2 .02 .08 5 A .17 } 11.4 .18 .76 17 A .17 � 23.4 .02 .08 5.2 .M ,1.7 11,6 .18 ,76 17.2 ,04 ,17 � 23.6 .02 .08 5,4 .04 .1.7 11,8 .35 1.47 17.4 .04 .17 23.8 .02 ,C1f3 5.6 .U4 .17 j 12 .97 4.07 17.6 A .1.7 24 .02 A 5.8 A .17 12.2 1.94 15 17.8 .04 .17 k 24.2 .02 ,C3;3 6 .04 .17 12.4 .44. 1.85 18 - .04 .17 24.4 0 0 6.2 .04 .17 18.2 .04 .17 (=a c.-P o r - . R-3 3 Tucker Farms Drainage Analysis July 12 1984 Page 2 PlA .2 0 0 1.2.2 w 1.45 ,4 0 0 12.4 .02 .36 .6 0 0 J2.6 A .18 .8 0 0 12.8 .01 118 1 0 0 13 .01 .18 112 0 0 13.2 .01 .18 1,4 0 0 13.4 0 0 1.6 0 0 13.6 0 0 1.8 0 0 13.8 0 0 2 0 0 1.4 0 0 2,2 0 0 14.'1. 0 0 2.4 0 0 14.4 0 0 2.6 0 0 14,6 0 0 2.8 0 0 14.8 0 0 3 0 0 15 0 0 3.2 0 0 15.2 0 0 3.4 0 0 15.4 0 0 3.6 0 0 15.6 0 0 3.8 0 0 15.8 0 0 4 0 0 16 0 0 4.2 0 0 16.2 0 0 4.4 0 0 16.4 0 0 4.6 0 0 16.6 0 0 4.8 0 0 16.8 0 0 5 0 0 17 0 0 5.2 0 0 17.2 0 0 5.4 0 0 17.4 0 0 5,6 0 0 17.6 0 0 518 0 0 17.8 0 0 6 0 0 18 0 0 6.2 0 0 18.2 0 0 6.4 0 0 18.4 0 0 6.6 0 0 18.6 0 0 6.8 0 0 1.8.8 0 0 7 0 0 19 0 0 7,2 0 0 19.2 0 0 7.4 0 0 19.4 0 0 7.6 0 0 19.6 0 0 7.8 0 0 19.8 0 0 8 0 0 20 0 0 8.2 0 0 20.2 0 0 8.4 0 0 20.4 0 0 8.6 0 0 20.6 0 0 8.8 0 0 20.8 0 0 9 0 0 21 0 0 9.2 0 0 21.2 0 0 9.4 0 0 21.4 0 0 9.6 0 0 21.6 0 0 9.8 0 0 21.8 0 0 10 0 0 22 0 0 10.2 0 0 22.2 0 0 10.4 0 0 22.4 0 0 J0.6 0 0 22.6 0 0 10.8 0 0 22.8 0 0 11 0 0 23 0 0 11.2 0 0 23.2 0 0 11.4 ,01 .18 23.4 0 0 11.6 .01 .18 23.6 0 0 11.8 .01 .18 23.8 0 0 12 ,LA .73 21i 0 0 12.2 Cli 1.45 24,2 0 0 12.4 .02 .36 24.4 0 0 0 p ._ 'i,f `fucker Farms Drainage Analysis Jnly 12 1984 Page 3 P113 I/ -/" (' ! 'r I.S/ ..0 /J^X)I-1 ,. r' r o �1rn. �rnn1. A 2 0 (0=' � 12.2 1.39 7.71 ~T .4 .01 .06 IM 1.13 6.27 .6 .02 .11 12.6 ,29 1.61 18 .02 .11 12.8 ,17 .94 1 .02 .11 13 .17 .94 1.2 .02 .11 13.2 .17 .94 1.4 .02 .11 13.4 .13 .72 1.6 ,0?_ .11 13.6 .03 .44 1.8 .02 .11 13.8 .03 .44 2 .02 .11 14 .03 .44 7.2 Xv .1,1 14,2 .03 .44 2.4 .02 .11. 14.4 .06 .33 2.6 ,(1). .11 14.6 .03 .17 2.8 .02 .11 14.8 .03 .1.7 3 M .11 15 .03 .17 3.2 .02 111 15,2 .03 .17 3.4 .03 .17 15.4 So .17 3.6 ,03 0 15.6 .03 17 3,8 .03 .17 15.8 .03 17 4 .03 .17 16 .03 .17 4,2 .03 .17 16.2. .03 ,17 4.4 .03 .17 16.4 ,03 .17 4.6 03 ,17 16.6 .00 .17 4.8 .03 .17 1.6.8 .03 .17 5 .03 .17 17 .0.1 .17 5.2 .03 .17 17.2 .03 .17 5.4 .03 .17 17.4 03 .17 5.6 .03 .17 17.6 .03 .17 5.8 .03 .17 1.7.8 .03 .17 6 .03 .17 18 .03 .17 6.2 .03. .17 18,2 03 .17 6.4 .03 .17 18.4 .03 .17 6.6 .03 .17 18.6 .03 .17 6,8 .03 .17 18.8 .03 .17 7 03 .17 19 .03 .17 7.2 .03 .17 19.2 .03 .17 7.4 .03 .17 19.4 .03 ,17 7.6 .03 .17 19.6 .03 .17 7.8 .03 .17 19.8 .03 .1.7 8 .03 .17 20 .03 .17 8.2 .03 .17 20.2 .03 .17 8.4 .03 .17 20,4 .03 .17 8.6 .03 .17 20.6 .03 .17 8.8 .03 .17 20.8 .03 .17 9 .03 .1.7 21 .03 .17 9.2 .03 .17 21,2 .03 .17 9.4 ,05 .28 21.4 .03 .17 9.6 .07 39 21.6 02 .11 9.8 .07 .39 21.8 .02 .11 1.0 .07 .39 22 .02 111 10,2 .07 .399 22.2 .02 .11 10.4 .08 .44 22.4 .02 .11 10.6 .O3 A 22.6 .02 111 10.8 .03 .44 22.8 .02 .11 1] .(,6 .44 23 .02 ,11 11..2 M .44 23,2 02 .11 11.4 ,13 72 23.4 02 .11 11.6 .17 .94 23,6 02 .11 11.8 .25 1.39 23.8 .02 .11 12 .63 3.49 24 .02 .11 12.2 1.19 7.71 24.2 .02 .11 12.4 1.13 6.27 24.4 .01 .C6 C FAW-R - 1,1 Tucker Farms Drainage Analysis July 12 1984 Page 4 �A rrf?a� 32 PIA PIB '10TAL 1 0 0 0 0 .0 2 0 .17 0 0 .17 3 0 .28 0 0 .28 4 0 ..39 0 0 .39 5 0 .39 0 0 .39 6 0 .39 0 0 .39 7 0 .39 0 0 .39 8 0 .44 0 0 .44 9 0 .44 0 0 .44 10 0 .44 0 0 .44 11 0 .44 0 0 .Z4 12 .18 .44 0 0 .62 13 .18 .72 0 0 .9 14 .18 .94 0 0 1.12 15 .73 1.39 0 0 2.12 16 1.45 3.49 0 0 4.9!4 17 .36 7.71 0 0 L8.07� 18 .18 6.27 0 0 6.5 19 .18 1.61 0 0 1.79 20 .18 .94• 0 0 1.12 21 .18 .94 0 0 1.12 22 0 .94 0 0 .94 23 0 .72 0 0 .72 2A 0 .44 0 0 .14 25 0 .144 0 0 .IA 26 0 .44 0 0 .M 27 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 1 � Tucker farms Drainage Analysis July 12 1984 Page 5 E2 ra Z =')lei/.y Gl TDIC ?Cll'AT, 2 0 0 12.2 2.16 .4 107. ,05 12.4 .49 -T.38 .6 .02 .06 12.6 ,2 .56 .8 .02 .06 12.8 .2 .56 1 .02. .05 13 .2 .56 1.2 02 .05 13.2 ,2 .56 1.4 .07 .06 13.4 ,1 ,28 1.6 .02 .06 13.6 .1 .28 1.8 .02 .05 13,8 .1 .28 2 .02 .05 14 .1 .28 2.2 .02 .OG 14.2 ,1 ,28 2.4 .02 .06 14.4 .(A 1] 2.6 .02 ,06 14.6 .(A i! 2.8 .02 .06 14.8 04 .J1 3 .02 .06 15 .04 11 3.2 .02 .06 15.2 (A 11 3.4 .(A .11 15.4 .(Y4 ,11 3.6 o4 I1 15.6 04 ,11 3.8 .(A ,11 15.8 .04 11 4 .04 11 16 1(A ,11 4.2 .04 11 16,2 Olt ,11 4.4 1(A .11 16.4 .04 11 4.6 ,0'i 1! 16.6 A .11 4.8 .(A .11 16.8 ,(A .11 5 .04 .11 17 .04 11 5.2 ,C+ .11 17.2 .04 ,11 5.4 1(A .l.l 17.4 04 11 5,6 .04 .11 17.6 ,C4 ,11 5.8 .04 11 17.8 04 ,11 6 .04 11 18 .Ov 11 6.2 .A'F ll 18.2 .04 11 6.4 'AA .11 18.4 .(A ,11 6.6 A .11 18.6 .014 .11 6.8 .c4 .11 1.8.8 .04 .11 7 .(A .11 19 A4 .11 7.2 .0# .11 19.2 .04 11 7.4 .01 ,11 19A ,(A Il 7.6 .(A ,11 19.6 A 11 7.8 (Y, ,11 19,8 ,(A 8 .04 11 20 A .11 8.2 A ,11 20.2 .(y+ ,11 8A .04 11 20A .04 .11 8.6 C� 11 20.6 .04 11 8.8 .04 11 20.8 .A4 .11 9 JA .11 21 (A 1Z 9.2 .04 Z1 21.2 ,04 9.4 1w ,23 21.4 ,02 X6 9.6 .08 23 21.6 ,02 Z 9.8 103 .23 21.8 .w .05 10 .06 .23 22 102 .06 10,2 .03 .23 22.2 02, A 10.4 .1 .28 22.4 02 .06 10,6 .1 .28 22.6 .02 ,C 10.8 .1 .28 22.8 ,02 .05 11 .1 .28 73 .02 .06 11.2 .1 .28 23.2 .02 X6 11.4 .2 .56 23.4 A2 06 11,6 .2 56 23.6 02 .06 11.8 .39 1.1 23.8 ,02 .05 12 1.03 '' 3.05 24 .02 .06 12.2 2.16 6,1 26.2. 02 A .E2.4 .49 1.38 24.4 0 0 c FACU - ,56 I I Tucker Perms Drainage Analysis July 12 1984 Page 6J () f x/ 7A /�J��v s:r �f S TIME IWAL ,2 0 0 12.2 .2 3.63 .4 0 0 12.4 .05 .91 .6 0 0 12.6 .02 .36 .8 0 0 12,8 .02, .36 1 0 0 13 .02 .36 1.2 0 0 13.2 .02 .36 1.4 0 0 13.4 .01 .18 1..6 0 0 13.6 .01 .18 1.8 0 0 13.8 .01 .18 2 0 0 14 ,01 .18 2,2 0 0 14.2 .01 .18 2.4 0 0 14.4 0 0 2.6 0 0 14.6 0 0 2,8 0 0 14.8 0 0 3 0 0 15 0 0 3.2. 0 0 15.2 0 0 3.4 0 0 1.5.4 0 0 3.6 0 0 15.6 0 0 3.8 0 0 15,8 0 0 4 0 0 16 0 0 4.2 0 0 16,2 0 0 4.4 0 0 16.4 0 0 4.6 0 0 16.6 0 0 4.8 0 0 16.8 0 0 5 0 0 17 0 0 5.2 0 0 17.2 0 0 5.4 0 0 17.4 0 0 5.6 0 0 17.6 0 0 5,8 •0 0 17.8 0 0 6 0 0 18 0 0 6,2 0 0 18.2 0 0 6.4 0 0 18.4 0 0 6,6 0 0 18.6 0 0 6.8 0 0 18,8 0 0 7 0 0 1.9 0 0 7.2 0 0 19.2 0 0 7.4 0 0 1914 0 0 7.6 0 0 1916 0 0 7.8 0 0 19,8 0 0 8 0 0 20 0 0 8.2 0 0 20.2 0 0 8.4 0 0 20.4 0 0 816 0 0 20.6 0 0 8.8 0 0 20.8 0 0 9 0 0 21 0 0 9.2 0 0 21.2 0 0 9,4 .01 .18 21..4 0 0 ' 9.6 .01 .1.8 21.6 0 0 9,8 .01 .18 21.8 0 0 10 SA .18 22 0 0 10.2 .01 .18 72.2 0 0 10.4 .01. .18 22.4 0 0 10.6 .01, .18 22.6 0 0 10.8 .01 .18 22.8 0 0 11 .01 .18 23 0 0 11,2 .01 .18 23.2 0 0 11.4 .02 , .36 23.4 0 0 11.6 ,02 36 23.6 0 0 11.8 (A .7.3 23,8 0 0 U. 1 1.82 2h 0 D 12.2 .2 3.03 24,2 0 0 17.4 .05 .91 WO 0 0 Tucker Farms Drainage Analysis July 12 1984 Page 7 i� a E j�C•l1 �j1� 17P `1 OYAL .2 0 0 12.2 .87 5.26 .4 4.45E-03 .02692428 12.4 ,93 5.63 .6 0 0 12.6 .89 5.38 .8 .01 .05 12.8 .69 4.17 1 .02 12 13 .2/4 1,45 1.2 .02. .12 1312 .18 1.09 1.4 .N .12. 13.4 .16 .97 1.6 .02. .12 13.6 .13 .79 1.8 CV,, .12 13.8 11 .67 2.0 .a'Z-- ,I,' It.j. ,Orf 1 S'�2 .U2 2.2 .02 .12 14.2 .09 .54 2.4 .02 .12 14.4 M .48 2.6 .02 12 14.6 .05 .36 2.8 .02 .12 14.8 .05 .3 3 .02 .12 15 .(XF 24 3.2 .02 .12 15.2 04 .2/i 3.4 .02 .12 15.4 A4 .24 3.6 03 118 15.6 .04 .2A 3.8 .03 .18 15.8 .04 .24 4 .M .24 16 X4 .24 4.2 01 .24 16.2 .04 .24 4.4 .0'i .24 16,4 .04 .24 4,6 ,04 .24 16.6 .M .24 4.8 di 24 16.8 .04 .24 5 .04 .24 17 .04 ,24 5.2 ,4 .24 17.2 A .24 5.4 .04 124 17.4 X4 .24 5.6 Ot .24 17.6 .04 .24 5.8 ,(Xi , .24 17.6 ,04 .24 6 .04 .214 18 .0'+ .24 6.2 SA .24 18.2 .C4 .24 6.4 .(Yt .24 18.4 .04 '.24 6.6 .44 .24 18,6 .C4 .24 6.8 04 .24 18.8 04 24 7 .04 .24 19 0+ .24 7.2 .0+ .2/+ 19.2. .04 .24 7.4 .04 .24 19.4 Wt .24 7.6 .04 .24 J9,6 04 ,21+ 7.8 .04 A 19.8 .04 .24 8 .(A .24 20 .04 .24 8.2 .04 .24 20.2 .04 .24 8.4 .04 .24 20.4 .04 .24 8.6 .04 .24 20.6 .04 ,2/4 8.8 A .24 20.8 .04 .21, 9 .04 .2A 21 .04 .24 9.2 04 .214 21.2 A .24 9.4 (YF .24 21.4 .03 .1.8 9.6 .05 3 21.6 03 .18 9.8 C() 36 21.8 .02 .12 10 .07 .42 22 .02 .12 10.2 .07 .42 22.2 .02 .12 10.4 C3 .48 22.4 .02 .12 10.6 .03 .48 22.6 .02 .12 10.8 .08 ,48 22.8 .02 .12 1.1 .09 .514 23 02 .12 1J.2 .(D .54 23.2 02 .12 11.4 .11 .67 23.4 02 .12 11.6 .13 .79 23.6 .02 .12 J1.8 .2 1.21 23.8 .02 .12 12 .42. 2.54 24 .02 .12 12.2 87 5.26 24.2 .02 .12 12,4 .93 5.63 24.4 .0I .06 r Tucker rorms Drainage Analysis July 12 1984 Page 8 FM ROAD JULY 12 1%4 Cvn?O N L b fief 32 P7A P2EL TOTAL 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 .18 .21, 0 0 .42 3 ,18 .24 0 0 .42 4 .18 .3 0 0 .48 5 18 .36 0 0 .54 6 ,18 .42 0 0 ,6 7 18 .42 0 0 .6 8 .18 .48 0 0 .66 9 118 .48 0 0 .66 10 .16 .48 0 0 .66 11 .18 .54 0 0 .72 12 .36 .54 0 0 .9 13 .36 .67 0 0 1.03 ]A .73 .79 0 0 1.52 15 1.82 1.21 0 0 3.03 16 3.63 2.54 0 0 - 17 .91 5.26 0 06,17 18 .35 5.63 0 0 5.99 1.9 .36 5,38 0 fl 5.74 20 ,36 4.17 0 0 4.53 21 .36 1.45 0 0 1.81 22 .18 1.09 0 0 1.27 23 .1.8 .97 0 0 1.15 24 .18 .79 0 0 .97 25 .18 .67 0 0 .85 26 0 ,54 0 0 .54 27 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 V SOILS ANALYSIS TUCKER FARMS DEFINITIVE PLAN SOILS July 12 1984 The Soil Conservation Service Maps describe the soils on site to be Hinckley and Whitman. The Whitman soils are in the wetlands and the Hinckley in the remainder of the site. All test pits and percolation tests, which were performed in the spring of this year were performed in the Hinckley soils. The results are attached. The depth to water varies as shown on the sheets. The soil is primarily sand and sand with cobbles and boulders. Ledge was not encountered, but large boulders and nested boulders can make excavation in some areas difficult. '��..,.'Yr+�!YMr!�W.►w.MrhNM�a` y�.4y:vW�tnn��I���w v.�yW/rrwuwi.r.IMM.L.�w:Y.�iwI..M......• _ �.�own/oily l��r, h ���c1�a� o.�S�r�e� d�/!�l � .. ��at .Na. Loc./Subdiv. v Gr Lit. 2.v �' Pl n Qwraer _ � '• '. .. _, . ,. -.Fad � ' 7nvras�:ictnC� .r'S�" ��is =,c ' Obsx'ver`SOIL ,PROFILES-DM Y+4+ado�iMw.WlkWm bNd•4nlHf,re.,Wx�W.iwv�w 4 I f 3 3. ^ LF 1 '. WMrrw�1 4. 4 h 6 �} .� ...... N V1 : nenchraark. Location E,levtlt:L4r1 Datulll - Percolation Tests-Date Pit Number t re1x.: . r ...: is�('G� � 4 J Start_Saturation 9;3 h ) t'� .].rich 111Ll1 UCc, Christiansen El,ngi.nee.r, inr, '7 9? 'M n i n r.{.,, -4- SOIL PROFInE & PSRCb7.11"'YON '7'EST DATA rre,<<rn/City N�.&Street Lot No. Plan �7wr�e�r SOIL PROFTLES-DATE E'lev. Elev. tin I E • � I Location Datum Pe.rcolat.i-on Tesl,s-Date 2 I r} SaturationPIT 17;ne E • . ! rr...•ur..r.I.w.� -All Di 6 7 .. _ .': �..�..�:�t �c�• 3�r t c,f r_ E�tµ►�.r��:�.� _��..,, ..�.ti..�.. �. E ....�..���.:.. �„Y..., `4 , Cshristi.an en Eflginc -rang SOIL PRov--'X, tic PERCOLATTbnT TEST DATi, � Lot No. Loc,r/subdiv -..b< Plan Uwrier 'i .I.nvt uti gittor �l ��>r r ,. Observer SOIL PROMES-DATE r 9Y / A�yy+wy WyaWa.wx.pW 1./wWmn.w.ww 6r r.r «.r YY r, .21 r.i.fY'V f a ~ J.�e V f I aJ1J�s o f j�,J r7 - # �x J n \ 6 r o _ _ to 10 1.0 P,C,n CT)ril Location v ti..ton -Datum — Percolation olati.on Tests-Date [''4 t Number 1.4ir. t Saturation t . �In4l Drop. Christiansen Engineering 99 :in.i ; „ 1Q+-^ --+ SOIL PROP .oX, Sc TEST DATA Lot No. plan Observer 0 SOIL PROPTLES-DATE v El e v Elev. Ol 0 2 wMM. 2 J Ito 4 5 6 6 6 77 9 10 10 3.0 Location ,:A.ev L,ttc-))l Datum Percolation Tests-Date 2 ............ art Saturation I'(-- 'I'l.VI r -mc idnuto Chrintiansen Eng inearin r,, SOXY, ' & PERCrI,AT TON TEST ES DATA 1 a...,�..--.....r.....aww,........-,,....ad••-.w,...�.......�....,.:w.,.w-=-•......w..,.w.w_.d.....w..,...n,.w�.....a-er t � r Lot; No. �:A) ; ,/Subdiv.o I U C- f t"c 1"t plan ow,yier Observer SOIL PROFILES-DATE �..-...« ry aa•'a aw.�r y�•�++ a ...�.. Elev. ryi a A..I 1 v Y "•"W.J�.L'V r _ x x z .�._.. ,::r use.r�1�;y.,�, --�..��.•. try � 7 7 E ' 9 9 -�- - Location Percolation '.bests-Date Flit, Nutaber •:... t Saturation ��._.._...,..,,,........ t�lz;. N1 I.rl II } [ ca a.r�cµtll_LY1Lt'I�{t.r Ghr r;tiangen Engineering 'I'72 MELin Strrr, t: I ) , SOIL PROPli-in; & PERCOLATTON TEST DATA Town,/cAy jLA M4�c1�' �.NO.Otreet ;off: No. Lo(; ® /Subfty. .,l;+r','�.1 , �, �..:a nIan OwnGr '.�- .rnvu:',t.l.gjjtor Observer SOIL PROFILES—DATE ' !�*�M..+4++�rre..�..w Y44awYnw-w�.w..+wutw.v-.-+•4,..• L.#.ev. �— Elev. L._rnev. twp 1 N 7 7 - 7 E;er�t.,ltrctir�t ',� Location Elevation Datum Percolation Tests—Date l ii2"k �ii3�:1.1rration T Chr, isti an ;en #,n fi.rti�e.r. :i ng 0� 9tl �- f j LIST of PLANS. Sheets 1-3 Recordable Lotting Sheets Sheets 4,5 Plan and Profile Sheets Sheet 6 Construction Details Sheet 7 Site Regrading Sheet