HomeMy WebLinkAboutEllen Cashman Summary for 11.14.2023 Meeting - Correspondence - 0 WINTER STREET 11/2/2023 CASHMAN WINTER STREET LAND- A BRIEF SUMMARY
Family history in North Andover
As has been explained previously, (see Ellen Cashman's 6/6/23 letter),the Cashman family has a long
history with the town and has been serving the community and standing for the closeknit, caring small
town feeling of North Andover for over 100 years.
History of Land
• Twenty-six acres of what had been farmland were purchased in the late 1940's.
• A home was built at the corner of Winter and Dale streets and the rest of the land was
untouched and taxed as farm land.
• In the 80's a few acres closest to the Smolak Farm were divided into house lots and sold.
• Before the two-acre zoning was proposed in'87,the rest of the land (lots 8-15) were subdivided
into one-acre buildable lots before town meeting with trusts set up on each acre parcel.
• The pond was sectioned off into its own lot in case any family member might want to continue
to own it as the land was eventually sold.
• After they sold their service station at 4 Main Street and retired, and after the two-acre zoning
was approved at town meeting, Frank and Joan began to sell the one-acre lots on Dale Street
through the 90's when they needed the income.
• Two lots were gifted to children, Ellen and Patricia.
• All Dale Street lots were sold by 1998.
• Building permits were granted on all sold lots even though, unbeknownst to the Cashmans,the
grandfathering had expired.
Land sales and taxes
• Only the three lots on Winter Street remain unsold.
• Over$220,000 in property taxes have been paid on those three lots since 1992.
• The Assessor lists the Winter Street Lots as buildable lots.
• There was no notice that the town would stop honoring the one-acre lots, and since they
continued to be assessed and billed as one-acre lots, the Cashman family believed that they still
had three buildable lots.
• Frank Cashman passed in'88 and Joan Cashman continued to pay taxes until her passing in 2021
at 95. Paying taxes caused a financial hardship for her.
• If the Cashmans had not been using that$220,000 for taxes over thirty plus years, they could
have invested the money and enjoyed significant financial returns on their investments over
those decades.
Abutters and supporters
• The two negative responses from abutters are from people who live several houses down from
the edge of the property. At the October meeting, negative emails from Mr. Ford were read
aloud. There was no mention of the many supportive emails that were also sent to the zoning
board.
• The abutters who are closest to the property have not voiced negative responses and the
abutter at 360 has sent an email in support of the project.
Supportive Letters and emails
6/6/23 Ellen Cashman letter explaining family history in town and family hardships
• 8/2/23 Letter of support from abutters Kristen and Christopher Lavoie at 360 Winter Street.
• 8/6/23 Email of support from Fran and Ellen (Long) Murphy
• 8/7/23 Email of support from abutter Daniela Karina at 863 Dale Street
• 8/8/23 Email of support from Carol Smolak Leary of Essex Street
• 8/8/23 Email of support from John & Diane Carney of South Bradford Street
• 8/9/23 Email of support from David and Carolyn Williams at 140 Winter Street
• 10/9/23 Email of Support from Peter Breen
• 10/21/23 Email of support from Michael Smolak
8/8/23 Abutters and neighbors Cathy& Byron Leonhard and Michael Helman along with Ellen &
Fran Murphy attended the meeting in support of the appeal.
Unsupportive emails
• Ron Ford at 428 Winter Street sent a total of eight emails between 8/8/23 and 9/13/23. It
should be noted that Mr. Ford lives several houses down from the lots in question and his home
is on the opposite side of the street. Only one small corner of his property is within the
abutter's area and there are no wetlands threatening his property.
• 19/9/23 Email from Sarah Tanaki (responses prepared by Andover Consultants
Letter from Smolak and Vaughan dated August 7, 2023
Although not all of Atty. Smolak's letter is applicable to the Cashman's appeal,the letter of
explanation points out that the change in zoning"resulting in unsuspecting owners having their land
slashed in value as a result of these changes." He also points out that "it is was only recently that the
Town began interpreting the language of the Zoning Bylaw's CBA provision in a way which is radically
different from how it had consistently interpreted and applied it since it's inception over a period of
more than 30 years."
Mr Smolak also states:
Ellen Cashman and many other landowners in a similar situation (i.e.,who have made a substantial
investment in land over the years, and where the Town itself has had the benefit of taxing the land as
separate buildable single family lots) have been made subject to an unanticipated change in the
longstanding interpretation of the CBA provisions of the Zoning Bylaw." He concludes:"The Town has
effectively amended the Zoning Bylaw without due notice. In effect,the Cashman Family is now being
punished for holding out, and maintaining this land as open space for over 30 years. And there are many
others like them in Town.That is not right.
Cashman Narrative and Timeline
These two submitted documents clearly explain and outline the trusts and conveyances of the Cashman
property.
Also important is the following:
Notwithstanding any argument to the contrary that the remaining undeveloped Lots
shown on Plan 40905-D are protected under M.G.L. c. 40A, § 6, the Town's actions in issuing
building permits for Lots 8, 9, 11 and 12 must be honored for the remaining undeveloped Lots.
Massachusetts courts have repeatedly emphasized the importance of uniformity in land use
decisions. See, e.g., Fafard v. Conservation Comm'n. OfReading, 41 Mass. App. Ct. 565, 569
(1996) ("In the administration of controls limiting the use of land—as with any exercise of the
police power—uniformity of standards and enforcement are of the essence. If the laws are not
applied equally they do not protect equally.");Montgomery v. Board of Selectmen of Nantucket,
95 Mass. App. Ct. 65, 77 (2019) ("The possibility that the commission may have taken
inconsistent positions on similar proposals, without exploring or explaining the inconsistency, is
a particularly relevant concern.");ASD Three Rivers MA Solar, LLC v. Planning Bd. Of the
Town of Wilbraham, 29 LCR 124, 136 (2021) ("The Board's application of different
interpretations (i.e. different methodologies) to different [permit] applicants was arbitrary,
capricious and legally untenable."). Therefore, since the Town previously treated four of the Lots
shown on Plan 40905-D as benefiting from the isolated residential lot zoning protections under
M.G.L. c. 40A, § 6,para. 4, and in the interest of uniformity, the Town must treat the remaining
undeveloped lots similarly.
Legal, Engineering and Wetland Submissions
All materials requested by the zoning board of appeals have been submitted and questions answered.
Miscellaneous
The pipe which was installed under Winter Street in the mid 80's backed up and formed the wetland
area near the driveway on Winter Street. If the pipe were to be cleared by the town,the wetland might
disappear.
Purpose of Zoning Board of Appeals
The Zoning Board of Appeals was created as a vehicle to grant relief from the strictest interpretation of
the law in situations where there is good cause to consider leniency. It was not created to make appeals
as difficult as possible but rather to recognize hardships and vote positively when there is evidence that
it will not impact the neighborhood. The engineering and wetland studies show that the impact to the
neighboring land will be minimal.
Conclusion
The town of North Andover Assessor's office continues to describe the Winter Street Lots as "Buildable"
and they are taxed accordingly. This in addition to its history of allowing Dale Street lots to be sold as
one-acre lots into the late 90's constitutes a past precedence that should be honored as these last lots
are sold.
The Cashman family is not asking for hundreds of apartments that have impacted other areas of
town. They simply want to be able to have building permits for three lots which will have a minimal
impact on surrounding property.
The family has stewarded this land for over 70 years. Unfortunately, financial and estate settlement
issues make the sale of the land a must. The remaining family members are in their senior years and
need as much income as possible from the sale of that land. Permits for those three lots would give
them that relief while providing a kinder, gentler solution for the land and its neighbors than other
options they may be forced to consider.
The Cashmans grew up in North Andover when it was a working man's town where people and boards
cared for, listened to, supported and celebrated each other. The family sincerely hopes that North
Andover has not lost the understanding, concerned, generous, and helpful attitude towards its residents
that it has had in the past.
Submitted by Ellen Cashman
November 2, 2023