The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-18-1989 Correspondence PRD P-ART]IIENON DEVELOPMENT GiE?oui-1, INC, 85,3 TuRNPIKE STREET, ST J t T E 2 4,t NORTH ANT OVER INIASSACHUSET,rs 01845 - -589-8900 5 0 8) ( February 28, 1989 Planning Board . Town of North Andover 120 Main Street North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 Re: Rosemont Dear Planning Board: Please find enclosed ten sets of the documents required under the Zoning By Law for a Special Permit PRD. The development complies with all of the relevant provisions of this By Law. In addition, we have worked hard to address all of the concerns raised by the Technical Review Committee in our submission. The team of professionals assembled include Joe Borgesi, Andover Consultants, Curt Young, Sasaki Associates and Claude Miquelle. They have allowed us to present an extremely carefully planned, environmentally sensitive and high quality development. Supplementary information on Sasaki Associates and Claude Miquelle is enclosed for your reference. While we are disappointed that Scott Stocking is no longer with the Town, we would urge you to contact him with respect to the time and care invested in complying with the objectives and suggestions of the numerous committee meetings which he chaired. We are proud of this submission. We believe that it goes beyond meeting the letter of the By Law by capturing the spirit of those who drafted the By Law. We look forward to the public hearing on March 16, 1989. Sincerely, Joh cc: Karen Nelson Christian Huntress A AV Al r q :.:.,.. Professional Engineers and i_and Surveyors - 160 SUMMER STREET HAVERHILL, MASSACHUSETTS 01830 (508) 373-0310 Mar c h 14_ ! 1989 North Andover Planning Board Town Off ice Building W Main Street Nor th Andover . MA 01 @45 Re Rosemon t Dear PI ann i ng Board t1ember• e. On behal f of ZMC Trust I offer• the fol 1owi Fig comments concerning the Rosemont project . ZMC: Tr a�• t owns t h'{e Holly Ridge subdivision which abuts. the Rosemont project . There are two specific areas of concern about the Rosemont design and the effect it wi l 1 have on Holly Ridge : the sewer connection and the runoff . Holl -° Ridge is a 13 lot subdivision which required a sewage pump station . A station of a 10 gpm capacity with a. 2 inch force main would have been adequate to serve that prof ect . Hoviever , through the Planning Board process and at the direction of -the North Andover D. P .W . 2MC: Trust was r•epu i red to i nstal 1 a 250 gpm stat i on and a 6 i nch force main . The reasoning for the larger station as presented b>, the G . P .M . was that eventually the Town would like the station to serve as part of a central sewer system and serve far more homes than just Holly Ridge . If ZMC was required to put in such a large station it would seem reasonable that the Town would require " Rosemont " to provide sewer improvement to the Holly Ridge pump station rather than to allow the sewage to f 1 ow to the Route 114 pump station . The drainage analysis as presented by Andover Consultants •for Rosemont shows a zero increase in peak flow for the 100 year storm , but an increase in flow for the 10 and 50 year storms . Additionally , the drainage study does not account for the effect of the increased volume the Holly Ridge subdivision nor cues it evaluate the combined effect of the increased volume with Mosquito Brook . It is my opinion that this project wi l 1 cause flooding of the Holly Ridge subdivision and vli l l poss i bl Y increase the rate of f 1 ow of Mosquito Brook north of ,Johnson Street . Wert` ruly yours Very i p G . Bhr i st i ansen PGC/k s f Honrrr OFFICES OF; ` ' '° `[)�� t [)� ' 120 Maiti A APPEALS + N[�1t1) �1 it[ll��r r�ull..�INc� �,y: ::�,�. N(� �1�N1)C�V ��i n��:s��tl,tt EAts 01845 CONSEFIVA t-toN I rIVISI( N OF V)0I8) (382448 3 HEALTH PLANNING PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I H '. NFII .-'�()N, I )lrtt7_{:'FOR 3/20/89 Mr . John Nolan Parthenon Devl . Group , Inc . 853 Turnpike Street North Andover , MA 81845 Dear Mr . Nolan ; I am writing in regards to the development entitled " Rosemont " which went before the Planning Board on March 16th , 1989 . The questions and concerns that were raised that night were as follows ; * The Planning Board has scheduled a site visit for March 25 , 1989 . We would like you to have the center line of Rosemont Drive , and all intersections clearly marked . * The Planning board would also like to see examples of the kind of rip-rap walls that you have proposed for the entrance off Chestnut Street . * Considerable concern was raised regarding the proposed sewer system and how the site would handle run-off during peak levels . I realize that you are prepared to answer any questions as they arise and I am confident that you will keep me informed as to your conversations with Christiansen & Sergi . The Planning Board has voted to continue the public hearing on this matter until the first meeting in April , which will be held on April 5 , 1989 . In the event that you have any questions , do not hesitate to call upon me . r rhristian C . Huntress Environmental Planner . —. s- THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS r - � _ o l MICHAEL S. DUKAKISIj GOVERNOR JOHN ❑EVILLARS SECRETARY TO : Distribution FROM : Jacki Wilkins , Associate Environmentalis DATE : March 24 , 1989 SUBJECT : Rosemont , Chestnut St . , North Andover EOEA# 7631 An Environmental Notification Form has been submitted for this project . According to Chapter 30 , Section 62 , the Secretary of Environmental Affairs must issue a decision regarding the sig- nificance of the potential environmental impacts of this project , and must determine whether and Environmental impact Report should be required to document these impacts and all feasible means to reduce damage to the environment . Therefore , a consultation meeting will be held to receive advice and comment from agencies , officials , and citizens regarding which environmental issues , if any , are significant on this project , Opinions as to the extent of significance of possible environmental impacts will be welcome : The meeting is scheduled as follows : DATE : April 7 , 1969 TIME : 9 AM LOCATION : onsite The meeting agenda will include a brief presentation of the project by the proponent , with periods for questions , answers , and open comment . Additional comments will be welcome in writing prior to April 16 , 1989 . Questions on the meeting may be answered by contacting Jacki Wilkins of the MEPA staff at 727-5836 . JW/j iw 100 CAMBRIDGE STREET, BOS I ON, MA 02202 f6171 727-9800 PARTHENON DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. 53 'FURNPIKE STREET, SUITE 241 NIA R, I 9SACHUSETTS OIB4n NOR= ANDOVE........ (5013) 689-E3900 April 6, 19891 Planning Board Town Hall North Andover, MA 0 1845 Re: ROSMONT Dear Planning Board: Drainage concerns were raised by the engineer for the principals of the Holly Ridge (Deerfield) Subdivision at the original hearing on the Rosemont development. This abutter feels, based on their engineering data, that flooding could result on their property. While we are confident that this will not occur, we are undertaking an analysis of Musquito Brook to confirm our data. The abutter is unwilling to share this information with us, notwithstanding the request made by the Planning Board. Therefore, we request a continuance of our hearing until April 20, 1989 to undertake the additional analysis. Sincerely, Jo n J.:)olan' n F ssonrHa } _ OFFICES OF: ° Town of 120 Maln Street AI'1'EAt.S N01-1NORTH ANDOV ER mas � chusAnclo tls BUILDING) DIVISION OI= (61 7) G8-4775 CONSERVATION NSERVATION HEALTH PLANNING PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KAREN H.P. NELSON, DIRECTOR 4/ iw3/Q9 Mr,. Phil C',hr i of i (rartmen Chriztxansen (.-md IS- orgi [w ar Inc. I �, £ I.t►��C17 . tr�� t l-I averh i x x y II( 01830 Dear mrr chr i, st i. angen j I tiave beer, are ked by the Planning Board to Qont'.-ri yt: Y01A with regard to Rosemont 1-IRD. You Arid your twoompany have made allegAtiorm allai. rmt the propouwd devolopment tiz the fart that the dr°airiacte caiciAlat ions>r are ejithr-- r wrong or mi zrepresentedr The Plarming 5oard is a5 i ng for your C"-Ial Herat i.awn in this mcit t er ��nd would like you to u-i t down with r-epr-es.errrtat xves from the Rosemont prat jest and share whatever ai rl f orraat i, on you ma- y ha-�ve with them. I am d i. zap pc-,i nt ed with the marrrler in which yo Ut" G'O M[aarsy has handled i, tzelf up to this point - I hope tha'it f III this dtite forward yCILt will show both the Town and tfie development teal'I'I frcim Rosemont a ti i gher degree of professi.orial c0Ur1tesyr r x ncere I y, E.r iy x ronma:sr"It a I P,I anner"r cc. Karen Nelson John N Iari John Mc0 arry U¢HDRIIf A . OFFICES OF: � °� Town Of � 120 Main Street North Andover, API'EAI_S NORTH ANDOVER Mass�idWtse. ts c 1845 BUILDING DIVISION OF tG l 7y E�85 4775 CONSERVACONSERVATION HEAI-'I'I-I PI-ANNING PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KAREN H,P, NELSON, DIRECTOR 4/20/89 Mr . John J . Nolan Parthenon Devl . Group , Inc. 853 Turnpike Street North Andover, MA 01810 RE : Rosemont Dear Mr . Nolan , This is to inform you that on March 5 , 1989 during a public . hearing , the Planning Board voted to continue the public hearing on the above stated project until May 12 , 19896 As always , if you have any questions regarding this project please feel free to contact me . sincerely ; Christian C . Huntress Environmental Planner. F µonr� �� Town of OFFICES OF: o m 12() II•Ic1'1E1511'C'.C:1 APPEALS o .f " NORTH ANDOVER Nrfr�I� A��cIr��J��, It•S�t ;��ic-f it I�c'11� {} 1 f3I Mtll.l)INC; 011 ISION0 1 ) CONSERVATION � {i 17 (i�3; �I 77?i HEAL`1'H PLANNING PLANNING & COMMUNITY DE, VELOPMENT i KAREN H,I'. NELSON, l)IREC OR 5I4I89 Mr. John J. Nolan Parthenon Devi . 0rwo L(p, i nc. 853 Turnpike Street North Andover, MA 01810 FEE : Romeniont Bear Mr. Nolan, X would f''irmt x iko to thank You for cc-1mi. r+ll bef prep the Fllay-min.q Board dLtrinU their April 24, 1989 meeting. Some of the concerns that werm raised at the mo et• i,rEp r� • Are the hei. ghta of all buildings within the 341 rEc.ximl.mi cA l 1 owed by the zoning by 1 aw. • Landzeape runt erp i arEe r1just be subm i t t od for r ev i r_w to my department . • Subterranean flow of ground water. The Dr-nard would like to Zee th i e included in your drt-A i r,,�rUe ana 1 ys i s. • We w,�uid 1 ike you to be prepared to addresys ec—h if tt drai,nape concerns raised by both the UPIW c~%rEd Ilia t=,i. rlymi ng board. ne aIWa. YS, if you have any questions regarding thin matters pleame feel free to contact me. i �cer Xy fry tirist ian C. Huntress Eriv i t^onment a i Planner MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board FROM: Parthenon Development Group, Inc. DATE: May 11, 1989 RE: Rosemont In the course of the permitting process, a number of written inquiries or questions have been submitted to Parthenon regarding this development. Attached to this memorandum are the four separate letters. All questions have been now satisfactorily resolved as follows: 1. North Andover Fire Department letter dated March 15, 1989 1 . Residential Sprinklers will be installed; 2. All road grades are 9% or less; 3. Names of roads approved by the Fire Department; 4. Hydrants will be placed in conformity; 5. Signage will be posted; d. Box will be installed with keys given to Fire Department; 7. A fire break will be maintained as requested; 8. There will be numbers on all houses; 9. Alarm and detection devices will be approved by Fire Department prior to installation, 1 11. Planning and Community Development letter dated March 20, 1989 A. Cover Letter 1 . Site visit was completed on March 25, 1989, with the center line of Rosemont Drive and all intersections clearly marked; 2. Rip rap wall examples submitted at last public hearing; 3 . Extensive additional drainage analysis has been submitted; B. Planning Concerns 1 . See Erosion and Siltation Control Program prepared by Wetlands Preservation, Inc. which provides for weekly and emergency monitoring; 2. Fire Department is so satisfied; 3 . Emergency access to Holly Ridge Lane conforms with numerous discussions with Town Planning Department; 4. Sewer routing through Holly Ridge Lane. Tie in is shown on revised plans submitted to Planning Board; 5. Detailed plans of entranceway at Chestnut Street were submitted for review at April 27, 1989 hearing; 6. Line shown is the trunk line. Drainage computations reflect accurate CN values; 7. Form A plan submitted with revised plans to Planning Board; 8. See revised plans; 9. Bench mark shown on revised plan; 2 1 D. Revised plans were submitted to D.P.W. Plans have been revised so that all velocities conform to A.S.C.E, manual No. 37. 11 . Multiple Culverts are now provided; 12. We would agree to a condition that a construction schedule be approved by the Department of Planning & Community Development that is compatible with our approval from the Conservation Commission, See Erosion and Siltation Control Program provided by Wetlands Preservation, Inc. C Site Drainage Concerns Extensive additional analysis and detail work has been done. See drainage plan and regrading plans submitted. Also see drainage study of Mosquito Brook watershed. 1 . Revised grading plans address this concern; 2. Spot grades added to the plans assure that the flow is directed down Ridge Court; 3 . Revised grading pland address this concern; 4. See new drainage report; 5 . Yes. The profile shows the finish grade of the cut; d. See new drainage report; 7. See new drainage report; 8 . See new drainage report; 9. Grading plans have been revised to address this concern; 10. This replication area is adjacent to the existing wetland; 3 I r 11 . Cape Cod bOrm is proposed for all main roadways; 12. See grading plans, 13 . Elevation for 100 year storm has been provided for all ponds. Neither pond overtops for the 100 year storm. 10 and 50 year storms are lower than the 100 year storm; 14. Revised plans show subdrain locations; 15 . See new drainage report; 16 . See new drainage report; 17 . See new drainage report; 18 . See new drainage report; 19 . See new drainage report; 20. The extra volume of runoff doew not result in increased flooding downstream. See revised drainage report; 21 . 10, 50 and 100 year storms have been addressed with full mitigation; 22. All computations are based on a Type III storm; 23 . See revised drainage report; 24. 9 8 25 . See new drainage report; 26 . New drainage report uses Johnson Street as a design point; 27 . The detention pond routing uses the Storage- Indication Method. The culvert outflows are determined using inlet and outlet control; 4 28 . JJB Associates has worked with D.P.W. to provide an acceptable BOYDCO water pumping station. See report submitted. Water main is looped to Holly Ridge Lane; 29. See new drainage report. III. Division of Public Works letter dated March 24, 1989 1 . New sewer routing makes this question irrelevant; 2. See agreement regarding Holly Ridge Pumping Station; 3. DPW is satisfied that capacity exists at Holly Ridge Pumping Station; 4. Permits will be obtained; 5 . No sewer slopes generate velocities greater than 10 f.p.s. d. See revised plans for sewer service connections; 7 . See revised plans; 8. Sewer easement provided, see Form A plan submitted; 9. Materials have been submitted; 10. See revised plans for water service connections; 11 . See revised plans for compliance; 12. Such connections have been avoided wherever possible. See revised plans; 13 . Done. See revised plans; 14. Done. See revised plans; 5 1 y. 1 15 . See construction detail sheet; 16. Utility companies will not locate them until approved plans are presented; 17 . See revised plans. A construction detail sheet has been provided; 18 . Yes. See revised plans; 19. See revised plans and drainage report; 20. See revised plans and roadway drainage report; 21 . See revised plans and roadway drainage report; 22. See drainage report which shows Essex County soils map; 23 . See drainage analysis. All of 10, 50 and 100 year storms have been mitigated; 24. Multiple Culverts have been added. See revised plans; 25 . See revised drainage analysis; 26 . Done. See drainage analysis; 27 . Done. See drainage analysis; 28 . Site distance in excess of 300 feet is adequate at Chestnut and Rosemont. This was studied at site visit. Speed bumps and posted signage will be installed at station 11 + 40 Rosemont Drive. 29 . See Erosion and Siltation Contol Program prepared by Wetlands Preservation, Inc. 6 1 IV. Planning and Community Development letter dated May 4, 1989 1 . All buildings are well within maximum allowed by zoning bylaw; 2. See Plans L1, L2, L3 and L4 which have previously been submitted; 3 . See drainage analysis We have worked very hard with all concerned town officials and look forward to securing the Special Permit and developing Rosemont, which should prove to be an asset to the community and a financial gain. to the tax base of the community. Rosemont is an efficient use of Clay Pit Hill in harmony with its natural features. The vast majority of the land is preserved as open space and is subject to a perpetual restriction. While fully protecting natural resources, we are meeting the town's housing needs by providing luxury attached single family homes in which the owner's can enjoy carefree living. 7 PARTHENONDEVELOPMENTGPoup, INC. 'j'Uj-,NP1KE, STREET, SUITE 241 -�TTS 01647, -?, MASSAC -IUSr NOIM-i ANDOVEI May 11, 1989 North Andover Planning Board North Andover, MA 01845 Re: Rosemont Gentlemen: At this time, we have responded to all the concerns raised by the various town officials and agencies with respect to this development. Reference is made to several new documents submitted since the time of the last public hearing including copies of: 1 . Site Plan Submission dated May 11, 1989; 2. The expanded drainage study of Andover Consultants, Inc.; 3 . The Erosion and Siltation Control Program revised May 5, 1989 by Wetlands Preservation, Inc.; 4. Boydco Booster Water Pumping Station information; 5 . Written reply to all 82 written questions posed by various town boards or agencies pursuant to these hearings; and 6. The Usable Open Space Restriction. The revised plans reflect that sewer will tie in at the Holly Ridge Pumping Station. PARTHENON DEVEEOYMENT GRoup, INC. I This issue was raised by Christiansen & Sergi in their March 1.5, 1989 letter to the Board. Further, they questioned the drainage analysis previously i submitted. Be advised that extensive additional drainage analysis I and plan revisions have been made with the following results: 1. . Zero increase in flow for the 10 year, 50 year and 100 year storms; 2. The drainage study now has reviewed the entire Mosquito Brook watershed and accounts for the increased volume of the Holly Ridge Subdivision and the combined effect of the increased volume with Mosquito Brook. 3 . The study demostrates no impact on the Holly Ridge Subdivision and the rate of flow of Mosquito Brook North of Johnson Street. Discussions have taken place between Mr. Christiansen and Andover Consultants, Inc. A copy of the drainage analysis has been presented to Mr. Christiansen although he has not supplied a copy of his work product. In any event, by objective analysis, this development will not adversely impact any abettors with respect to drainage. At this point, the Planning Board has all the information necessary to make a decision granting a Special Permit for Rosemont. I respectfully request that you close this public hearing and reach a decision as soon as possible. I believe that Rosemont can be a model development for the Town and is exactly what was intended when this Special Permit law was enacted. Sincerely, oh J. N in cc: Planning and Community Developme f , Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors 160 SUMMER STREET HAVERHILL, MASSl CHUSETTS 01830 (508) 373-0310 May 15 � 1 ?89 Mr . Christian C . Huntress Environmental Planner Planning Comma n i t Y De 1 opme n Town of North Andover 120 Main Street i North Andover , MA 01845 Dear Mr . Huntress : I accept your apology with regard to Your letter of April , 13 , 19G1? and wish to inform You that since our meeting of April 26 , 1 1?89 I have continued to work with Andover Consultants with regard to the Rosemont project . I met with Bill MacLeod and Dave Jordan at Andover Consultants to discuss their preliminary results and have since received a copy of their revised analysis . I have also received Mr . McGarry` s authorization to review the drainage analysis . Sincerely , Phil fp G . Christiansen FGC/k s cc Jahn Nolan John McGarry Karen Nelson i I PARTHENON DEVELOPMENT GROu113, INC. ' �N7I �L STREET, SUITE 7 LItan Tu s =, 1 -_ - - -- Nor?TH ANDOVEr-�, NIASSACHIJSETTS 011345 j May 1.5, 1989 z S Mr. Christian Huntress Environmental Planner t - Town of North Andover 126 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 Re: Rosemont Dear Mr. Huntress: We hope that there was no confusion at the hearing on Thursday, May 11, 1989 about the location of the groundwater. We want it to be clear that groundwater had been previously located by test drillings. In particular, there were questions about the water table along the dirt access road into the site from Chestnut Street, This was suggested by a Planning Board member as an appropriate test location. Three separate drillings took place along this road. (See the attached location map.) Groundwater was observed at 10 feet. I can have Briggs confirm this in writing if you wish. I can also have additional test drillings or holes dug for observation at your convenience. I believe that Mr. Perna and Mr. Nitzsche of the Board were going to follow up on this matter. Would you check with them and please advise. We continue to try to satisfy all the concerns of townspeople as we attempt to build a model development under the special permit law. We look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, "ohJ. an ,1 fr - � r J5 ;7 � 13I-b + g_- ST. - c�•�� P•7" •� 1z� � BRI GGS M Solz��G GoG4 a ■a•.� �nla. DR. BY: I SCALE: NONE PR0.1_ NO. "�12- CK`D BY: CH 6 DATE: a- - !a FIG. NO. i PARTHENON DEVELOPMENT V RQUP, INC. a. r ;. F3 5'1 TURNPH(E STREET, SITITE 24-I "x NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS 01845 (508) 689-6900 June 15, 1989 a Mr. Paul Hedstrom, Chairman ' North Andover Planning Board 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 Re: Rosemont Dear Mr. Hedstrom: Reference is made to the attached June 14, 1989 letter from J . William Hmurciak to you regarding the comments of the Division of Public Works. Mr. Hmurciak was not available today so that we were unable to talk with him directly. However, we have or can address all of his concerns. Please be advised that we are in accord on item 1 . An acceptable condition would be: "The maintenance and operation of the proposed booster water pumping station will be the responsibility of the owner. The station shall not reduce the residual pressure in the Chestnut Street water main to less than 20 psi under any operating condition. Prior to construction, the final design of the pumping station, including the location, site grading, landscaping and appurtenances of the booster station shall be subject to the review and approval of the D.P.W." Items 2, 3 and 7 are acceptable and will be available for the review and approval of the D.P.W upon Mr. Hmurciak's return next week, PARTHENCN DEVELOPMENT GROTJP� INC. With regard to item 4, Andover Consultants designed and analyzed the tennis court detention pond so that there will be no such topping even in a 100 year storm. With regard to items 6 and 8, an agreement has been reached with ZMC Realty Trust and they will provide the necessary documentation for Mr. Hmurciak with regard to the permit for the Division of Water Pollution Control. With regard to item 5, Andover Consultants designed the sewer and water main at the manhole of station 4 + 0 so that there is no crossing. Since they parallel each other, there appears to be no reason to provide additional vertical separation. I trust that this will satisfy all concerns. Sincerely, Parthenon Development Group, Inc. by hn J. NQJA, Pr 'dent cc: J. William Hmurciak Christian Huntress North Andover Planning Board Andover Consultants, Inc. JJB Associates, Inc. Sasaki Associates, Inc. TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER. MASSACHUSE't"i'°S 3 I DIVISION OF PUBLIC WORKS , 384 OSGOOD STREET. 01845 PAUL S. NIMAN r �t�'� I� 's``� `'> :! � ft r1QRr DIRECTOR �I 6�y I §§i i apAdR,�TEP q '`"`y June 14 , 1989 �.VSSAC�iuSEi Mr . Paul Hedstrom, Chairman Planning Board 120 Main Street North Andover , MA 01845 Re : Rosemont P.R.D . Dear Mr . Hedstrom: The Division of Public Works has reviewed the May 11 , 1989 revision of the Rosemont site plan and has the following comments to make ; 1 . The maintenance and operation of the proposed booster water pumping station will be the responsibility of the owner . The station shall not reduce the residual pressure in the Chestnut Street water main to less than 20 psi under any operating condition. The location, site grading , landscaping and appurtenances of the booster station shall be shown on the plan. The final design of the pumping station shah. be subject to review and approval by the D. P.W. 2 . The Nast hydrant on Ridge Court should be placed on the end of the water main with the services tapped in before the hydrant . 3 . A detail of the connection to the water main on Holly Ridge should be shown on the plan. 4 . The emergency outlet structure for the tennis court detention area must be capable of handling the projected peak out flows assuming the outlet control pipe is plugged without topping the availabale freeboard. 5 . The invert of the sewer at the manhole of station 4 + 0 on the emergency access lane should be lowered to provide proper vertical separation between the .water and sewer mains . 6 . A sewer system extension permit from the Division of Water Pollution Control of the Mass . Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, and written permission from the owner to enter the Holly Ridge Road Pumping Station must be obtained prior to issuance of a sewer extension permit by the Division of Public Works . Page 2 Rosemont P.R.D. 7 . A drop manhole connection should be added to the detail sheet . B . Permission to open the street and construct roadway and utilities within the Holly Ridge Road R. D.W. must be obtained from the owner of that subdivision . ❑ery ,tr yours, J. William Hmurciak Director of Engineering & Administration JWH: lb !" I i I f PA.P I'HENON DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. j s 855'3 'I'URNPINE STREFPT, SUITE 241 NDIi7`II ANUOVEI3, �' ASSACIIISL T TS 0181147 —�'_: --•---_ _ `' (508) 689-60100 's A June 29, 1990 PLANNING �-- OAkl `: Mr. Christopher Huntress Town Planner Town Hall North Andover, MA 01846 Re: Rosemont permit Dear Chris: } Due to the condition of the financial markets, l request that the time for commencing construction on this development be extended from one year to two years. The permit for the Rosemont development is dated July 18, 1990 and the construction schedule is found in condition 26. a. I Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, Y Joh J. H n i i l � i PARTHENON DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. r 55,,3 TURNPIKE STREET, SUITE 241 ,► - -------- NOR� i A novrl�, 1 SS c � rsFT Ts 01843 - >> (50f31 Cit3�7-f3900 -- - ...:.:......: ............... ......._.............. j y1 1 I' March 14, 1991 8 y.. t• 1. � 1' i Mr. Christian Huntress Town Planner Town of North Andover 126 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 Re: Rosemont Dear Mr. Huntress: Please include me on the agenda for the March 28,1991 Planning Board agenda. I am requesting an amendment to the approved Rosemont PRD. I will discuss this matter with you in detail prior to the meeting. i ncerely, 4Joh . No n