HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-01-04 Decision DEF SUB DENIED f f
Town of North Andover F ,3
Office of the Planning Department k , •S,
Community Development and Services Division
400 Osgood Street
North Andover,Massachusetts 01845
P (978)688-9535
F (978)688-9542
January 4,2005
"Methuen Avenue'
Roadway Improvement Definitive Subdivision Plan Denial
The Planning Board herein denies the roadway improvement definitive subdivision located off of
Methuen Avenue, located in the Residential-4 Zoning District. The application was submitted by Ronald
Giovanni 16 Macarthur Road, Peabody, MA December 3, 2004. Public hearing was opened on January
4, 2004.
Findings of Fact
The Planning Board denies the definitive subdivision based on the following findings:
The Definitive Subdivision Plan does not adhere to the Town of North Andover Massachusetts Rules
and Regulation Governing the Subdivision of Land in North Andover, Massachusetts, amended
December 2002. The applicant has failed to provide the following information:
The name of current owners of Methuen Avenue.—Written documentation documentation stating that the petitioner has the right to do the proposed improvements.
Written documentation that the Town can go onto the property to do any maintenance.
—Written maintenance agreement on who will maintain the road.
The proposed roadway width does not meet the requirements of section 6.8 of 26 feet.
The plans do not provide for a sidewalk as required. s
Section V—Definitive Subdivision Plan
5.2 A Lot Layout Plan was not included in the planset,
5.2.2 The Applicant has not provided a space for listing and dating revisions to the plan. :.
5.2.3 The name and address of the record owner has not included in the title block.
5.2.5.2.3.1 The plan has not provided ties,with bearings and distances, to at least two existing
permanent monuments in or adjacent to the subdivision
5.2.5.2.5 The units of acres have not been rounded to at least three decimal places. „
5.2.5.3.10 Test Pit results have not been provided.
5.2.5.3.15 The minimum two benchmarks in the subdivision have not been provided.
5.2.5.4.b.1 Bearing and distance is not provided for the construction baseline.
5.2.5.4.b.6 Bearings and distances are not provided for the drainage easements around the proposed
building.
5.2.5.4.b.7 Dimensions for the proposed parking area/driveway are not provided.
5.2.5.4.b.10 No water gates or appurtenances are indicated on the plan.
BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535
5.2.5.4,b.12 Gas service has not been provided.
5.2.5.4.b.13 ,E` p r lectrtc, telephone or cable Se�vEce has not been provided.
5.2.5.4.c.7 Proposed water line is not indicated on the profile.
5.2.5.4.c.8 Proposed sewer force main is not indicated on the profile.
5.2.5A.c.9 Vertical clearance between the existing gas line on Sutton Street and the
proposed sewer line is not provided on the plans.
5.2.5.5.a The proposed water line does not appear on the typical section.
The required cover is not indicated for the proposed sewer line.
Gas, electric, cable and telephone lines are shown on the typical section, however none
are proposed on the plan.
A minimum of 7' of loam and borrow is indicated on the typical section, however no
limit of grading line is indicated on the plan.
A depth has been specified for the gravel borrow type B in the pavement notes.
5.2.5.5.b Typical sections of the proposed detention/retention basins were not provided.
The V-Notch Weir at P-2 Elevation detail does not indicate the 100-yr storm water
elevation. '
5.2.5.5.c Profiles were not provided for the drainage swales.
5.2.6.d Closure calculations were not provided.
Section VI—Requirements for Improvements and Design
6.331 An erosion/sedimentation control plan,as described in Appendix VI, was not submitted.
6.14.5 V, No emergency spillways are proposed for the detention/retention basins.
6.14.9 Test pit results have not been provided. Ground water elevation was not determined.
Appendix V--Rules and Regulations Governing Storm Water Management
3.13.4 Seasonal high groundwater level was not provided.
3.17.2di,,,- A maintenance plan was not provided.
3.F.2.iii - Pollutant removal efficiency was not discussed in the report.
3.G A nitrogen and phosphorus loading report was not included in the report.
5.i The drainage is outletting directly onto the adjacent Ottaviani lot.
As the applicant has failed to follow all the required procedures and provide information required by
the Rules and Regulations as demonstrated in the findings, the Planning Board herein DENIES this
application for a definitive subdivision plan.
The following plans are included as part of this decision:
Plan: Roadway Improvement Plan
Methuen Avenue in
North Andover, MA
r
Applicant By: Ronald Gionvanni
16 Macarthur Road
Peabody, MA 01960
Prepared by: Merrimack Engineering Services
66 Park Street
Andover, MA 01810
Dated: December 2, 2004
Sheets: 1-4
Document: Application for Planning Board Approval
Proposed Roadway Improvements
Methuen Avenue
North Andover,MA
Prepared for: Ronald Giovanni
Dated: December 3, 2004