Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-12-02 Conservation Commission Minutes Conservation Commission Minutes DPW Conference Room December 2, 1998 Members Present Scott Masse, Deborah Feltovic, Joseph Lynch, John Mabon and Beth Wescott Robert Mansour and Albert Manzi, Jr , were absent Staff Present Michael D Howard, Conservation Administrator and Richelle L Martin, Conservation Associate Karen A Fitzgibbons and Richard Paquette were absent The meeting was called to order at 7 00 p in Scott Masse served as chairman Minutes: October 21, 1998 The minutes were not ready for approval tonight General Business (7:00 p.m.) 242-676/724 PCOC Wetland Rep Area Nadine Lane Subdivision (West Environmental) Mr Howard stated he was awaiting the replication area, which is now complete, and he has no further issues On a motion by Mr Mabon, seconded by Ms Feltovic, the Commission voted unanimously to issue a Certificate of Compliance for 242-676 and a Certificate of Compliance for 242-724 242-236 PCOC 410 Pine Ridge Road (John&Marsha Pliakas) Berger& Hyde, P C An OOC was issued on October 12, 1984 authorizing construction of roadways, drainage facilities and utilities associated with Appleton Street, Stagecoach Road, Pine Ridge Road and High Plains Road This lot was considered non jurisdictional and was not required to file a permit for the home There are no wetlands on or within 100' of the property Ms Martin stated she visited the site and has no issues, therefore, she recommends issuing a PCOC On a motion by Ms Feltovic, seconded by Ms Wescott, the Commission voted unanimously to issue a Partial Certificate of Compliance for 10 Pine Ridge Road 242-792 Violation/Enforcement Order—Woodlea Village Subdivision (Jim Grifom) Richelle Martin, Conservation Associate, made the initial presentation Present on behalf of the applicant was Atty Dom Scalise On November 2, 1998 Pam Merrill and Ms Martin inspected Woodlea Village to be sure it was in compliance with the OOC Field measurements indicated that there were possible violation on lots 5 &6 Most of the flags were up, but some were pink, some were orange and the writing had worn off Ms Martin followed up with a letter to Mr Grifom requiring him to submit as-built plans and attend the November 18th meeting to discuss the matter Mr. Grifom called and stated he would be out of town and could not attend the meeting and he could not get Merrimack Engineering to complete the as-builts by the deadline The Commission Office was concerned about possible encroachment �4 into the No Disturbance Zone, therefore Mr Grifom was instructed to have the flags re- established by November 19th or 20th On November 19th Ms Martin, Mr Howard and Mr Paquette inspected Woodlea Village and found the flags had not been re-established yet Mike and Rick were able to approximate where the wetland line was and where the flags should go There are No Disturbance Zone violations on lots 5 and 6 There were also silt breakthroughs in areas and the erosion control needed to be repaired An environmental monitor(Steve Stapinski) has been submitting monthly reports to the Commission Office,however,they are lacking in detail and have not indicated any problems on site Ms Martin stated she sent Mr Grifom a letter dated November 24th instructing him to submit a Buffer Zone Restoration Plan prepared by a qualified biologist by December 7th,remove the subject silt by hand by December 7th replenish the entire erosion control on lots 5 & 6 by December 71h and to replenish the flags by today (December 2°d) Furthermore, he was instructed to appear before the Commission this evening to discuss these matters Ms Martin recommends designating a new environmental monitor and he or Mr Grifom should appear before the Commission on a monthly basis with detailed reports Atty Dominic Scalese was present on behalf of Mr Grifom, who was out of town The April 8, 1997 letter from Mr. Howard to Steve Stapmski was read into the record noting history of violations to the present date The following condition numbers have been violated 4, 21, 30, 31, 38 Atty Scalise is present with plans and stated the siltation problem will be taken care of Flags have been re-established and Atty Scalise submitted plans drafted today by Merrimack Engineering Mr Lynch suggested that Merrimack Engineering be removed as the environmental monitor Ms Wescott seconds Mr Lynch's opinion Ms Feltovic stated Mr Lynch's opinions are appropriate and Mr Grifom's actions are unacceptable Fines were levied in accordance with the old and new bylaw Mr Mahon suggests any encroachment be verified by an engineer/surveyor hired by the Commission and to be paid through the bond money Mr Howard stated a new environmental monitor be assigned and that person and the applicant should appear before the Commission Mr Howard stated that according to section 178 10 fines can be levied from 11/2/98 to 12/2/98 1 alteration of the wetland area$100 per day 2 violation of OOC $100 per day 3 silt in the resource area$100 per day In addition he noted the following 1 buffer zone report to Commission Office by 12/7/98 and site stabilized by 12/14/98 2 expiration of OOC—suggests no extension be given in the future The total fine that Mr Howard is suggesting totals $9,300 Mr Lynch made a motion, seconded by Ms Feltovic,to remove Merrimack Engineering as the environmental monitor Discussion Mr Masse suggests the Commission issue a cease and desist until the environmental monitor has been approved by the Commission Before a vote could be taken, Mr Lynch made an amendment to his motion that a cease and desist be issued on DEP 4242-792 stating that all construction activity, except that associated with stabilization, be stopped and a restoration plan and report will be due in the Commission's Office by 12/7/98 and site to be stabilized by 12/23/98 The vote on the motion and amendment was unanimous Ms Wescott expressed concern regarding the survey issues Mr Lynch disagreed with Mr Howard's calculation of the fine and wanted to go back to the first date the applicant was made aware of the fine and made a motion, seconded by Ms Wescott,to levy a fine of$50 a day from 4/8/97 to 10/20/98 and $300 a day from 11/2/98 to 12/2/98 The vote on the motion was unanimous Filing Fee Expenditure - $5 364 50 (Conservation Assoc Position 12/18/98 thru 2/26/99 On a motion by Ms Feltovic, seconded by Mr Lynch, the Commission voted unanimously to expend $5,364 50 from the Conservation Filing Fee Account to fund the Associate's position through 2/26/99 Court Date—RE Timberland Builders, Inc (12/18/98 g 2 00 p in ) Mr Howard reminded the Commission members of the upcoming court date with Robert Janusz of Timberland Builders Public Hearings (8:00 p.m.) Request(s) for Determination of Applicabilrty Lot#14 Candlestick Road Ben Osgood, Jr is present this evening representing Belford Construction Mr Osgood stated that Lot 14 is a vacant parcel of land that has never been built upon Mr Osgood stated that on the there is a knoll on the left side of the lot which has an isolated depression Mr Osgood stated that there are three possible classifications one is an ephemeral pool, ILSF or a freshwater wetland The ILSF area is just below 1/4 of an acre foot of water with m7" Mr Osgood stated that Title V regulations are 7"of water for a 100 year storm Afresh water wetland has no vegetation and the soils indicate non- hydric conditions An ephemeral pool has seasonal flooding with 6" over 200 SF with staining of leaves and no evidence of flooding or fish There is no leafy litter supporting wetland organics Mr Howard asked what watershed flows into ILSF Mr Osgood ' stated that it is about an acre less than three acres Mr Osgood stated that the state regulations now calculate runoff to use in a 100 year storm Mr Howard stated that there are escrow account issues Mr Howard stated that the government needs to ratify changes made by the Attorney General Mr Lynch stated that it is a simple calculation and there is no need for Mr Chessia to review this Mr Lynch stated that Mr Howard can review the calculations Bill Davidson, 365 Candlestick Road, stated that the area is heavily flooded by his observation Tom Williams, 151 Candlestick Road, stated that he thinks it may be an ephemeral pool because he has seen standing water every spring Mr Howard stated that he would like to continue this Public Hearing until December 16, 1998 On a motion by Ms Wescott, seconded by Ms Feltovic, the Commission voted unanimously to continue the Public Hearing until December 16, 1998 Notice of Intent(s) #242-941 #227 Berry Street(Joan Brunette)New England Engineering cont fr 1]/]8198 Ben Osgood Jr. is requesting a one month continuance Mr Osgood stated that Ms Brunette has hired Appleton Land Surveying to produce a plan,but didn't produce a mylar recordable plan On a motion by Ms Feltovic, seconded by Mr Lynch,the Commission voted unanimously to grant a continuance until January 6, 1999 9242-942 Bradford Street, Map 62/Lot 23 (Robert Brown) Graham Boston Group Manny Rabbrtt, Mr O'Day and Domenic Scalise were present representing Bradford Street The wetlands were approved through an RDA and are accurate There is a sewer easement proposed through Mr Christie's backyard The 25/50' setbacks have been met The limit of work is defined by haybales There is a post and rail fence on the plan to prevent encroachments There is a 60' limit of work line The only item in the 100' buffer zone is the roof drains, erosion control and the fence A special permit was granted by the Planning Board On a motion Ms Feltovic, seconded by Mr Lynch,the Commission voted unanimously to close the Public Hearing and issue a decision within 21 days Decisions: #242-9391NACC#10 Lot #14 Chestnut Street (Acorn Realty Trust) N E Engineering On a motion by Ms Wescott, seconded by Mr Mabon, the Commission voted unanimously to deny Lot#14 Chesnut Street #242-940 4400 Osgood Street(Wm Bannister) Keach-Nordstrom Associates On a motion by Ms Feltovic, seconded by Mr Mabon, the Commission voted unanimously approve the draft decision as amended for#400 Osgood Street Adjournment: On a motion by Ms Feltovic, seconded by Ms Wescott, the Commission voted unanimously to adjourn the meeting