HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-11-20 Conservation Commission Minutesr
NACC MINUTES
• NOVEMBER 20, 1991
PRESENT George Reich, Chairman Paul Tariot
Alison Brewster V-Chair Carl Schoene
Richard Milliard Albert Manzi
Richard Doucette, Admin Robert Mansour
OLD BUSINESS
Lots 4 ,5 & 7 Sharpners Pond Rd /Salem St (242-281) - Discussion
George Farr appeared before the Board and stated the pro3ect is
finished Tom Neve is looking into a compliance This item was
placed on the agenda because the bond disappeared and was
possibly withdrawn by Mr Farr Mr Farr can recall getting the
bond G Reich wishes to have the bond re-posted Mr Farr was
urged to seek a compliance by the next meeting A new bond will
be required if a compliance is not requested by the 12/4 meeting
English Circle (242-497) - Compliance
Mr Pittochelli requested a certification of compliance and bond
release Tom Laudani also spoke The Order of Conditions required
a 25/50 no cut/no build The house on Lot 2 is 47 ' from the
• wetland G Reich stated the plan needs to show the limit of
grading C Schoene motioned to issue a compliance and grant a
bond release contingent upon receipt of plans showing extent of
grading in buffer zone, second by A Brewster The vote was 3-2-1
In favor C Schoene A Brewster and A Manzi Opposed P Tariot
and G Reich R Milliard abstained
Lots 3A & 4A Berry Street (242-550) - Modification
Tom Neve represented the applicant to request a modification to
install foundation drains in the 25 ' no-cut zone Upon motion of
P Tariot and second by R Milliard the Board voted to grant the
modification Bob Mansour abstained
NEW BUSINESS
Lot 16A (#191) Johnnycake Street - Partial Compliance
P Tariot motioned and A Brewster seconded the motion to grant the
partial compliance Passed unanimously
Lot 42 Kittredge/Bear Hill (242-158) - Partial Compliance
Ronald Cuscia represented himself requesting the partial
compliance Upon motion by P Tariot and second by A Brewster the
Board voted unanimously to grant the partial compliance
Lots 6,8 & 10 Hidden Court
Discussion of -he bond flood plain and wall in rear of property
• Motion to issue the decision as amended The vote was 6-1
R Milliard opposed
NACC 11/20/91
• Page 2
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1160 Salem Street - Determination (Cont )
Dick Barrett represented the petitioner The proposed addition
has been moved further from the BVW Upon motion of P Tariot and
second by A Brewster the Board voted to grant a negative
determination with erosion controls
Great Pond Estates (NACC #3) - Notice (Cont )
Mr Waites represented the applicant Elias Matathia and Farinon
also appeared
Revisions to the plan
-culvert crossing has been redrawn No work in the wetlands
-construction sequence submitted
R Mansour had questions about the delineation We need to agree
on a line Much discussion about disputed "wet areas" The
applicant will show the disputed area on the plan R Doucette
stated the delineation is inaccurate The construction sequence
and revised plans were submitted today A continuance is needed
to review this new information and agree on an accurate
delineation
Abutter Paul Moss questioned roadway width
Discussion of whether or not to continue or close the public
• hearing P Tariot moved to continue to public hearing to 12/4/
and R Milliard seconded 6 in favor G Reich, A Brewster,
P Tariot C Schoene R Milliard and A Manzi 1 opposed
R Mansour
Mazurenko Farm Hunting Regulations
G Reich announced procedure Petitioners will speak first then
NACC will vote whether or not to reconsider the rules If this
vote is positive those opposing the petition will speak
Jim Smith Essex Council Sportsman's League and Walter Hoyt, NE
Region of DFWL spoke The town shouldn't move ahead without a
uniform plan Install safety zones to ensure abutters safety
A Brewster voiced her safety concerns
R Doucette stated a plan was done Mr Hoyt was obviously
uninformed Certain restrictions could be in place as were
discussed in the previous public hearing
A Manzi asked if the town would lose possible acquisition funds
if hunting was restricted Answer yes
P Tariot askew if there are any towns with limited restrictions
Answer Middleton and Westford had restrictions but these lands
have been developed and now do not allow any hunting
•
NACC 11/20/91
• Page 3
C Schoene suggested discussing a compromise and difficulty of
determining present uses
A Manzi motion to reconsider the rules, R Mansour seconded
Discussion
Mike Campagna, hunter, stated he has never met anyone other than
a hunter on the property R Mansour stated it is very difficult
to enforce restrictions
Motion failed 3-4 In favor of motion C Schoene, A Manzi and
R Mansour Oppcsed G Reich A Brewster P Tariot R Milliard
RESCO, Old Clark & Holt Rds - Determination
Jim McIver and James Connolly Engineer represented RESCO and
presented plans for two silos Henry Fink and R Doucette
discussed an open file on this same project R Doucette stated
applicant should pursue a compliance on the old file while the
Commission reviews the new application
i
P Tariot motiored empower the site visit team to make a decision
in the field Motion seconded by A Brewster Motion passed
• Sutton Street Sunoco Station - Determination
Atty Peter Shaheen represented the applicant Mr Orfanos of
Enro Service Inc explained the project removal of soil and fuel
tanks Upon the motion of P Tariot and second by R Milliard the
Board voted unanimously to issue a negative determination with
the following conditions
- A hay bale erosion control barrier will surround all
excavated soil A similar barrier will be installed along
the river bank at the top of the slope
- A tarp will cove the excavated soil pile overnight or
during any precipitation
- Any manholes on sight will be covered during
I excavation/construction
-The catch basin will be cleaned
40 High Street/North Andover Mills - Notice
Jerry Foley and Joe Cushing represented the applicant
The building is a proposed 70 000 sq ft building A portion of
the pond (and associated wetlands) will be bridged by the
building While BVW is not filled it is shaded and should be
replicated Also the bank can be enhanced through plantings
R Doucette presented an overview of wetlands impacts
Discussion of wetland replication drainage system, erosion that
may take place when vegetation dies off and bridge construction
takes place Construction and demolition sequence is needed
• Drainage needs to be installed to ensure flood control and
pollution attenuation Final grades should be shown
I
NACC 11/20/91
Page 4
P.Tariot moved to continue the public hearing to 12/4/91 and
R.Milliard seconded.
Coventry I & II - Bond Seizure
No representation. P.Tariot motioned to seize bond and R.Milliard
seconded. Some discussion regarding the necessity of taking the
bond and the appropriate uses of this bond. Vote was 6-0-1,
A.Manzi abstained.
Lots 1&2 Lacy Street - Notice
Upon motion by P.Tariot and second by R.Milliard the Board voted
to continue to 12/4/91.
Lot 3 Marbleridge Road - Notice
Motion by G.Reich and second by A.Brewster to continue to
12/18/91.
DECISIONS
Lot I Villa Way
Motion by G.Reich and second by R.Milliard to accept the decision
as amended.
R.Milliard motioned to adjourn at 11: 55 p.m. second by
A.Brewster.
George Re Chairman
14ACC
Approved: