HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-08-24 Decision SP Meadowood III DEF SUB V-1 CA
BK 4121 F3 204
jo
�:.
�s T 4 W N U F N 0M_'H A N D 0 V E R u��i:- � : ,�,:�n
3 fb4. ..
AUG
_'.5
JOYMA. 4,s0
9
46
Any-appeal shall he fiied •�,.��_t�:. �� �
-
Within(20)da s rafter the
date-of-filing of this Notice
it��the�ffice o�the Town -NOTICE DF DEC IS r-on�
Clerk.
Date.August■241,1994.,,•r••r■r■■■
June 7, June 21,
Date of Hearing June■28,■July♦�?,
August 2, August 16j
August 23, 1994
Petition of +illsi-de Realty.TxursL...■r...•..■••.,r•a.....,■.■•,.srs•,,..+.■.i
ffect-ed 27�4 Hillside Road
Premises a
.Referring to the above petition for a special permit from the requirements
of the • Nor.th.Andover Zoning■-Bylaw ..Section+4,125�+Paragraph,26• (5�.....■•,.,
• the contruci.ton of -27 single -family homes on pro ert• • located �..;
So as to permit ►•,,.■,r■■,«•■a,a■■r,■■■,■■r•■a■•r■■•r•a•••♦■,■ .r r, +•■.+• C'7
at .274 Hillside Road, in the Residential-6 (R-6) Zoning Di-strict N.)
G.3
A ft-er a ublic hearing given -on tyre above elate, the Planning Board voted
COND ITIONALY
to estAPPROVE.,.,,.■.,the .■ SPECIAL "P.ERMIT ■r.■.■•• ■..........■ r......... ......... C�
.�..
based -upon the fouowiirg conditions:
� � 0
• Si ned
CC: Director of Public Works R. ...............■...■•.
Conservation Administrator
. J..aseph Mahoney, Mice Chairman
Health Sanitarian pool •• ■•■""" """"""'
��� e�� Assessors Richard Rowen, Clerk
Police Chief 6■,0•00•000..6•■■■••.r■.■■...,..
Fire Chief John;Da0lian♦�.■■.,,..........,
Applicant
Engineer -
File •••«,•■■ lgnnili�'.r$4�T `•,■■•••
Interested Parties
ATIESn
let �►� .
have
Wa 8 K 41-029 PG 193
r .r' $fl8rd
Notice to APPLICANT TWN-CLERK.•-6xl ����a�tiom of Act�.ox� of
can Definitive Subdivision Plan
Spfaci.al Permit and Definitive Play, :I,4,V4dow0-od North Andover, Massachusetts
By: Merrimack Engineering Services, Tnc% s dated April ig 94
. r �w
The North Andover JPlaz ing Board has voted to APPRM vaid p30SNnt subject-to the
following zonditions
1. That the record owners of the subject"land forthwith execute and record
a "covenant running with the-land", or otherwise provIde security for the con-
stmetion of-wVs and the installation of municipal services within said sub- �
di'r-.3ion, -all as provided-by GoLo c: 4., S r elmoU.
2. That all such -construction sand installation's-s shall.in"!&U re-specta
conform to the governing rmles and reAd-lativns of this Board
3. That, as required by the Forth Andover Hoard of Realth in it-s -re
port to
this Board, no b yr other structure shal I. be built or Tlace-d upon..Lots
No10 as shown orr zaid Ply without the 7rior
consent of said Board of Health.
4. Other conditions:
See Attached ` �. x
�,
:r
' r
In the -event that no appeal ahall have been taken-from said approval within
twenty days from this date, the North Andover P Hoard wM forthwt6th
thereafter endorse.its formal -approval .upon s ai4 flan.
The North Andover-P-.arming Hoard has DISAPPROD said plan, for the following
reasons;
r
' .
r
. NORTH I P AffW i�•
August 23, 1994 �� A. chard A. Nardella, chairman
Date: •
t
TOWN OF NORTH All D O VER N.0 R;:;
MASSACHU" SETT8
AuG 3 5
N❑RT),
❑ 14 co e4
lop
a r1k
Any � t cnc:i■iF+�r= �
appeal shall be filed %TSAC
SACHuSti
Within (20) days after the
date f filing of this Notice
NC7T10E of DECISloN
nthe of the Town
Clerk.
Date. 24: ■ 1994r • ■ . . . ■ . . . . • .
June 7, June 21
,
Date of Hearing June« 28+■ July. 19
August 2, August 16,
August 23, 1994
aHillside Realt Trust of r
a ■ • ■
Premises affected 0 ■ 8274 Hillside■ Road • . . . ■ . ■ • . ■ . . ■ ■ ■ ■ r ■ • . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . . . . Avg $ 00 ■
Referring to the above petition for a special permit from the requirements
of the , North Andover Zoning Bylaw :• section 4*125y■ • a Paragraph 26 (5)
• ■ ■ • ■ ■ • . ■ . ■ , a . •
the construciton of 27 single family homes on property located
soas to permit A . ■ • r r w ■ ■ w a ■ a ■ a a ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ w ■ • ■ • • ■ • ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ r ■ ■ . • • ■ • • ■ • • ■ ■ ■ a ■ see ■ ■ a
at 274 Hillside Road, in the Residential-6 (R--6) Zoning District
After a public hearing given on the above date, the Planning Board voted
CONDITIONALLY
to APPROVE • , ■ . ■ . •the . . PY�CIALe PERMIT . • . . . . . . • ■ . . ■ ■ ■ . . . • . . . . ■ . . . . . a so@ ■ . . . . .
based upon the following conditions :
Signed
cc: Director of Public Works Richard A. Nardella, Chairma
Building Inspector . . • ■ . . . . . . . . • . . • ■ ■ . . . . . • . ■ . , ■ ■ . a
Conservation Administrator
Joseph Mahoney, "Vice Chairman
Health Sanitarian • • • • . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . ■ . ■ * • • • • ■ . ■ ■ a " ■ • • •
Assessors Richard Rowen, Clerk
Po l i c e Chi e f ■ ■ • ■ a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ a a ■ In ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ r a ■ • r a ■ a s • • ■ ■
Fire Chief John Daghlian
Applicant . . ■ . . ■ . . . . . . . ■ . . . . . . . , ■ . ■ . . . . ■ . •
Engineer
File • ■ ■ • + • ■ • • . . • ■ r • • • • r ■ • ■
■ , . . . . . .planning B oard
Interested Parties
F
l
Notice to APPLICANT TOWN CLERK and Certification of Action of of P Board
on Definitive Subdivision Plan entitled:
Special Permit and Definitive Plan, Meadowood North Andover Massachusetts
Merrimack Engineering Services, Inc. dated April 19 94
By. f ..,.
The North Andover Planning Board has voted to APPRM said plant subject to the
following conditions
1. That the record owners of the subject land forthwith execute and record
a "covenant rurming with the land', or otherwise provide security for the core-r
st: action of ways and the installation of municipal services within Said sub-
di.-t-.3iony all as provided by G.L. c. 41, S• 81aoU*
2. That alI such construction and insta3.lations-,'shad].••ini a1.1. respects
conform to the governing rules and regulations of this Board.
3. That, as required by the North Andover Board of Health in its report to
this Board, no building or other structure ahall be built or placed upon Lots
NO* as shown on said Plan without the prior
consent of said Board of Health. .
4, other conditions:
•. • . f• 1 • . • •X +
See Attached
« Co
In the event that no appeal shall have been taken from said approval within
twenty days from this t
's date the North Andover P Board will forthw�th
thereafter endorse its formal approval upon paid plan.
The North Andover Planning Board has DISAPPROVED said plan, for the following
reasons:
• 1
1
r
I�oRTH p BD
Au ust �3, 1994 ,• •gichard A. Nardella, Chairman
g
$y.Date.
1
1
3.
tAORTN
Y ` �• V
I'AREN H.1-1. NELSON � p Town of 120 Main Street, m1'
Di c'dor- (508) 682-6483
n = NORTH[ ANDOVER
BUILDENG
CONSERVA'rION
AC""s DIVISION OF
HEAUM PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PLAA}. INC,
August 24 , 1994
Is
Ms. Joyce Bradshaw,
Town Clerk
120 Main Street
North Andover, MA 01845
Re: Special Permit - R-6 Zoning
District - Meadowood III
Dear Ms, Bradshaw:
The North Andover Planning Board held a public hearing on June
7 , 1994 in the Senior Center behind the Town Building upon the
application of Hillside Realty Trust, requesting a special permit
under Section 4 . 125, Paragraph 26 (5) on the North Andover Zoning
Bylaw. The legal notice was properly advertised in the North
Andover Citizen on May 18 and May 25 , 1994 and all parties of
interest were duly notified. The following members were present:
Richard Nardel 1 a, Chairman, Joseph Mahoney, Vice Chairman, Richard
Rowen, Clerk, John Simons and John Daghlian.
The petitioner was requesting a special permit for the
construction of 26 single family homes and the creation of 28 lots
on property located at 274 Hillside Road, in a Residential-6 (R-6)
Zoning District.
Mr. Rowen read the legal notice to open the public hearings.
Mr. Steve Stapinski, Merrimack Engineering, and Mr. Thomas
Laudani, developer were present. The fallowing information was
given to the Planning Board.
project site located o f f of Route 125 and Hillside Road,
'�
adjacent to Meadowood II
Lot 13 of Meadowood II is included in Meadowood III
Annaloro and Peterson Property also included
. Peterson house will remain
extend Bucklin Road through to Hillside Road, Peterson
Road and Benson Circle added as new roads
. Town water and sewer provided
change slope of site to slope back from wetlands to
g , then drain
Hillside Road, detention area on Lots 9 & 10,
to grassy swale, then to wetlands
all lots 51000 sq. ft. with 5, 000 sq. ft. upland.
Page 2 '
r
Meadowood III
Notice of Intent filed with conservation Commission
finish grading
close to edge of wetland but not filling
sidewalks will be required
water looped to Nadine Lane through an easement
, pedes
trian access easement on top of watermain to Nadine
Lane can be provided discussion of altering lot line on Lots 15, 16, 17 , 18 ,
as the driveways do not cross legal frontage
d if on a master plan for R-6, did roadways tie
Mr. Bowen asked p �
in? Mr. StaP inski answered that the roadway did tie in to all
properties, bu
t at the time the plan was developed he did not have
an accurate wet
land line a connection would require wetland
filling of more than a quarter of an acre.
'
Mr. Simons stated that Mr. Stapinski is to provide copies of
the original R-6 Master Plan to the Planning Board.
Mr. Simons ons stated that a roadway connection to Nadine Lame
must be reviewed and analyzed.
Nar della stated that the developer must be able to prove
Mr. ion is feasible*
to the Board that no roadway connect
expressed ressed the following concerns:
Mr. N p
grading' n of Meadowood III and Nadine Lane
upgrades to sewer and water
easements would be required for access
conce
rn about lot from Meadowood II combined with
Meadowood III
Ms. Colwell to bring Meadowood
II Master Plan to next meeting*
Mr, Hamel, 591 Turnpike Street concerned about traffic, wants
a traffic study done*
there was a need to have a Master
Mr. Mahoney stated that alicit
' c Plan Anal sis done in this area. Ms. Colwell to s
Tra f f 1 Y
Police information on traffic issues*
seconded b Mr. Mahoney, the Board
On a motion by Mr. Rowen, Y
voted
to continue the public hearing to June 21, 19940
Planning Board held a regular meeting.
On June 21, 1994 the Plan g
resent: Richard Nardella, chairman,
The following members were p
John Simons and Alison Lescarbeaur
Due to the lack of a quorum the item was tabled to the June
28 , 1994 meeting.
Page 3 :
Meadowood III
On June 28 , 1994 the Planning Board held a meeting. The
following members were present: Richard Nardella, Chairman, Joseph
Mahoney, Vice Chairman, Richard Rowen, Clerk, John Simons and
Alison Lescarbeau.
Mr. Laudan i spoke to the Board on zoning issues, Mr, Laudan i
stated that Lot 13 , Meadowood II, was one house lot not built on.
He stated he could further subdivide the lot as a modification to
Meadowood II.
Mr. Simons stated that this was not an issue with him. He
furt
her stated that if Mr. ' Laudani had the parcel to begin with it
would have been included in Meadowood II .
Mr. Nardella stated that a variance was granted for 2 . 9 acres
as opposed to the required 3 acres.
Mr. Simons spoke the intent of the 3 acre minimum requirement.
for the R-6 District.
Ms. Nelson asked for the total acres in Meadowood I and
Meadowood I I . Mr., Stapinski replied, 1116 acres" . Ms, Nelson asked
for the number of lots. Mr. Stapinski answeredr 1136 lots' .
The lengthy There was a len th discussion on Lot 13 and re-looked at the
6 scheme that was lai
Rd out for these parcels a year ago which was
in the Planning Board file.
Mr. Nardella want
ed the Board to think about the issue with
Lot 130
Mr. Mahone seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board
On a motion by Y►
voted to continue the public hearing to July 19 , 1994 .
the Plannin Board held a regular meeting.
On July 19 , 1994 g ,
` tubers were resent: Richard Nardella, Chairman,
The following me P
Vice Chairman Richard Rowen, Clerk, John Simons
Joseph Mahoney, ►
and Alison Lescarbeau.
Mr, Steve Stapinski discussed Conservation issues and revised
wetland line.
-. t ' ❑f a wetland crossing would be required for
100 to 13a
a roadway connection
need to do a substantial rework of the plan
' stated that the a 1 icant may lose one lot in
Mr. Stapinski pP
the redesign.
.. .. .....- ......:1. .J.1..•Y.w•.1_.-J ram..• 1...1er..a+.•A•,a_.K.. ..... .. - -
Page 4 :
Meadowood III
Mr. Nardella told Mr. Stapinski to rework subdivision to make
a less complicated plan with more regular lot lines and roadway
connection.
Ms. Colwell said to keep in mind if road is never connected,
may need to keep temporary cul-de-sac.
Mr. Nardella stated that the developer may be able to reduce
pavement at crossing to eliminate need to apply for federal
permits.
On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Simons, the Board
voted to continue the public hearing to the August 2 , 1994 meeting.
On August 2 , 1994 the Planning Board held a regular meeting.
The following members were present. Richard Nardella Chairman,
Joseph Mahoney, Vice Chairman, Richard Rowen, Clerk, John Daghl ian
p y
and Alison Lescarbeau.
Mr. Nardella attended the Conservation Meeting regarding
Nadine and Meadowood roadway connection, which entails wetland
filling.
Plans locate house at least 25 ' from resource areas. Roadway
connection replication to be split 50/50 with both developers.
There is an access issue with Lots 23 , 24 and 25, needs to be
addressed.
On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Mahoney, the Board
voted to continue the public hearing to the August 16, 1994
meeting.
1994 the Planning Board held a regular meeting.
On August 1�, g
The following members were present: Richard Nardella, Cha irman,
Joseph Mahoney, Vice Chairman, Richard Rowen, Clerk., John Simons
and Alison Lescarbeau.
Mr, Steve Sta inski and Mr. Thomas Laudani were present.
p
The
following
information was provided to the planning Board:
wetland line revised
removed cul-de-sac and one lot
common driveway between Lot 24 and 25
spread out Lots 24 and 25 and 23
turne
d house on Lot 10 to face subdivision and access
orientation of houses on Lots 10 and 14 and 15 so that
driveway is not in front of house
i.:
Page a
Meadowood III
The Planning Board discussed giving Lot 23 more space and
ability to take area from Lot 18 .
Mr. Simons stated the need for some physical space around
house to live.
Change house design on Lot 23 to maximize land area.
Ms .'A
Colwell questioned the need for truck turn around at end
of road if connection to Nadine Lane is not made.
Revised plans to be submitted prior to construction of the
roadway.
On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Simons, the Board
voted, to close the public hearing.
[alter lots 18 and 23 - IBC to review]
Lot A - retained by Annaloro, not enough buildable area on it 9 . 8
acres - to remain unbuilt upon.
On Augus
t 23 1994 the Planning Board held a meeting. The
follow
ing members were resent: Richard Nardella, Chairman, Joseph
g P ohn Da hlian.
Mahoney, Vice Chairman, Richard Rowen, Clerk and J g
Mr. Ste
ve Sta inski and Mr. Thomas Laudani were present.
There was a discussion of D. P.w, issueso
need to
create a turnaround at the end of Peterson until
a road connection is built to Nadine Lane*
olwell su ested that a temporary cul- de-sac be
Ms. C gg
construc
ted at the end of Peterson and that the lots covered by the
cul-de-sac be constructed when the roadway connection goes through
rovidin incentive to the applicant to pursue the roadway
thus p g
connection.
Mr. Nardel la asked what the time frame was for getting the
road connection through the Conservation Commission process.
Mr. Stap inski told the Board that the Planning Board approval
' then file with Conservation Commission based on
must be filed,
Planning Board decision. Conservation Commission will then issue
Pl g
' Conservation Commission denies the application,
a decisions I f the
ill a eal the denial to the Superior Court and
the applicant w pp
D.E. P. D.E.P. can issue a superseding order.
_. ' • _•a..a ,+rx.,..•..:s,,,..r.i.. .•...a e .w:....:n a.....'s.it,... ,-...«....-._.. .. ._
Page 6:
Meadowood III
The Planning Board could also be a party to the
application and therefore appeal the Conservation
Commission decision.
OWN Current plan shows no activity within 15 feet of wetland.
Roadway connection is not currently designed.
-- Conservation Commission will view roadway connection as
a separate application.
- Less 5, 000 sq, ft, wetland filling required.
Mr. Rowen asked why is the entire roadway not shown on the
plans?
Mr, Stapinski ' s reply was because in that case the
Conservation Commission would disapprove the entire project not
just the roadway connection and this would tie up the entire
project.
Mr. Rowen concerned that i f plans show a temporary cul-de-sac,
it will be more difficult to obtain Conservation Commission
approval.
Mr. Stapinski stated that the project can only obtain limited
access crossing status if the Planning Board requires the roadway
connection across the wetland.
Discuss ion of limited access crossing status limits ability of
local Conservation Commission to put conditions on project.
Mr. Stapinski stated that there would be 120 ' of roadway
through the wetland but less than 5, 000 sq, ft, of filling total.
Mr. Nardella stated that the Planning Board is looking at the
roadway from a safety and traffic flow point of view.
Mr. Daghlian suggested that the public safety issue be
discussed with the police department.
Mr. Stapinski suggested that a cul-de-sac not be a written
requirement, suggest that to achieve public safety need to require
road connection. Roadway connection would be limited to 221 .
Mr. Mahoney stated that applicants generally construct a
temporary cul-de-sac and remove it when roadway connection is made.
Mr. Stapinski could fit a small cul-de-sacinto the current
design. - on Lot 17 slide house back from the road 12 ' to fit 25 '
from wetland setback, slide Lot 18 house back, could. move homes on
Lots 17 , 18 and 19 to create room for cul-de-sac. Do not have to
change limit of grading, can build cul-de-sac same size as
Meadowood II.
Page 7 :
Meadowood III
Mr. Nardella said to put need for roadway connection in the
decision - strong language regarding public safety, acknowledge
reduced right-of--way and pavement.
Do not actually build road until Nadine side of road under
construction. Town keeps bond money to cover cost of construction
of connection.
Mr.� Nardella stated that the Planning Board should attend the
Conservation Commission hearing on the roadway connection.
Discussion of D. P.W. letter
3 , cape cod berm to be installed
1. Condition that design of roadway connection be submitted for
review and approval by the Planning Board and D. P.W. prior to
endorsement, but not shown on plan.
Why 10 ' fill?
Mr. stapinski stated that conservation required all grading to
send flow of water away from the wetland areas, could have 7 ft. of
fill without this requirement of Conservation Commission.
2 , temporary cul-de-sac
require applicant to submit to the Planning Board and D. P.W.
for approval a plan for a temporary cul-de-sac during
construction, prior to endorsement but not on the endorsed
plans
"to be utilized until such time as connection is finalized"
4 , 4 ft. sidewalks
Items 5 through 11 to be as written by D. P.W.
12 . Discussion of location of leach pits - not possible to move
pits out of front yard - will move pits as per D. P.W. where
possible.
Items 13 through 17 to be as written by D. P.W.
Roadway connection to Nadine Lane must be completed unless rendered
impermissible by the conservation Commission.
condition #1 Applicant shall within ninety (90) days apply for
permits to construct the roadway from station 4+50
through to Nadine Lane and upon receipt of
applicable permits construct such connection.
Page 8:
Meadowood III
Planning Board wants connection for public safety _ create
neighborhood in the R-5 Zoning District as consistent with the
overall plan of the R-6 Zone.
Ms, Colwell to add sidewalk width to the list of waivers.
[KBC to ask Chief -- re: need for fire boxes. ]
on a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Mahoney, the Board
voted to approve the Meadowood III Definitive Subdivision
Conditional Approval as amended and discussed.
Why show Parcel A in on the subdivision plan? Mr. Stapinski
replied, because regulations require remaining land of the owner to
be shown.
Discussion by the Planning Board that 28 lots created, 26 new
homes, 1 existing home, plus Parcel A.
Prior to endorsement the Planning Board and D.P.W. must review
design of road.
Discussion regarding the placement of a stockade fence behind
Lot 10 along Route 125 and along the Gallant Property. Ms. Colwell
to add as a condition.
Site opening bond set at $15, 000,
Discussion regarding whether any specific conditions should be
placed on Parcel A. No specific conditions to be placed on Parcel
A.
on a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Mahoney, the Board
voted to approve Meadowood III Special Permit as amended this
evening. The Chairman also voted.
Attached are those conditions.
Sincerely,
Planning Board
Richard A. Nardella, Chairman
attachment
cc: Director of Public Works
Building Inspector
Conservation Administrator
Health Sanitarian
Assessors
Police Chief
f
Page 9 :
Meadowi id I I I
Fire Chief
Applicant
Engineer
File
Y
t
z
3
Meladowrood III
special Permit, Residential - 5 Zoning District (R-6)
The Planning Board herein approves the Special Permit requested
by Hillside Realty Trust, P.D. Box 6700, North Andover, MA
. 01845 dated May 13 , 1994 . This Special Permit under Section
4 . 125 of the Zoning Bylaw, allows the creation of 28 lots
containing 26 new homes, one existing home, and a 9 ,895 acre open
lot noted as Parcel A. The entire project covers 14 . 83 acres in
the R-6 Zone off of Hillside Road.
The Planning Board makes the following findings as required by
Section 10, 31 of the Zoning Bylaw:
A, The specific site is an appropriate location for 5, 000
square feet lots as it is zoned R-6 and is adjacent to a
subdivision with similar lot sizes.
B. The use as developed will not adversely affect the
neighborhood as the site is adjacent to similarly sized
lots.
CO There will be no nuisance or serious hazard to vehicles or
pedestrians as a roadway connection between this subdivision
and the adjacent subdivision will be constructed, thereby
allowing residents to exit onto either willow Street or
Hillside Road. The Planning Board believes that this
connection is necessary for the public safety of the
citizens living in this subdivision. The current traffic
conditions on Route 125 dictate that motorists be given two
different access points onto that route. Furthermore, the
roadway connection provides a physical and psychological
connection between the adjacent R-6 neighborhoods which was
part of the overall design and plan for this Zoning
District.
D. Adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the
proper operation of the proposed use.
The Planning Board also makes the specific finding that this use
is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning
Bylaw. The development is sufficiently advantageous to the Town
and promotes the public wealth, safety, and general welfare of
the citizens of the Town of North Andover. In particular, the
Planning Board finds that this project will:
A. Permit greater flexibility and more diverse efficient, and
economical design of residential developments;
B. Facilitate economical and efficient provisions of utilities;
C. Meet the Town' s housing needs by promoting different types
1
z
of housing which is a benefit to the residents of North
Andover.
D. Conform to the overall intent of the R-6 District concerning
the lot design, road layout and other site features.
Finally the Board finds that this site complies with the Zoning
Bylaw requirements so long as the following additional conditions
are complied with. Therefore, in order to fully comply with the
approval necessary to construct the project as specified in the
Special Permit application, the Planning Board herein grants this
approval provided the following conditions are met:
1. Prior to Endorsement of the Plans by the Planning Board, the
appl cant agrees to the following:
The applicant shall post a site opening bond in the
a pp
amount of fifteen thousand ($15, 000) dollars to be held
by the Town of North Andover. The Guarantee shall be
in the form of a check made out to the Town of North
Andover which will be deposited in an interest bearing
escrow account . This amount shall cover any
contingencies that might affect the public welfare such
as site opening, clearing, erosion control and
performance of any other condition contained herein,
prior to the posting of the Performance Guarantee in
Condition 3 (c) in the Definitive Subdivision Approval.
This site opening bond may, at the discretion of the
Planning Board, be released in full or partially
retained in accordance with the recommendation of the
Planning Staff as directed by the vote of the North
Andover Planning Board.
,rA.., b.�`; covenants shall be recorded to insure that the #_3
architectural style of the proposed dwellings conform
- 1
....:.....
to those currently constructed in the R-6 zone.
...................
...
....:......
CIAOP The rear lot lines on Lots 18 and 24 must be adjusted
` o
to create a larger back yard for Lot 23 . Revision to
must be reviewed and approved b
the lot line mu pp Y the
Planning Staff.
/d.. A wooden stockade fence of the same size and style of
the fence constructed in Meadowood I must be
constructed between Rt. 125 and the rear lot line of
Lot 10 and along the property boundary between Lots 10,
15, 16 , and 17 and the Gallant property. A note must
be added to the plan showing the location of the fence.
2 . Prior to any work on site, the applicant must inform the
Town Planner prior to tree cutting. Any tree cutting shall
be kept to a minimum throughout the project in order to
2
e .
minimize erosion and preserve the natural features of the
site.
3 . Prior to any lots being released from the statutory
covenants, the conditions outlined in the Meadowood III
Definitive Subdivision Conditional Approval must be
followed.
_..
4- Prior to FORM U verification for an individual lot, ,
r
a. Lots 10 18
g 23 and 24 require a special permit from
the Planning Board for access to the lot other than
over the legal frontage. A special permit must be
obtained, recorded with the Registry of Deeds, and copy
of the recorded decision received by the Planning
Office prior to receipt of a building permit for those
lots.
E
I
i
b. Lots 24 and 25 require a special permit from the
Planning Board for access via a common driveway. A
permit
special it must be obtained recorded with the
P p I
Registry of Deeds, and a copy of the recorded decision
;r received by the Planning Office prior to issuance of a
_.
..........
..........
_._ .,..__ building permit for those lots.
y...
5. Prior to a Certificate of occupancy being issued for an
individual lot:
a. Prior to occupancy of Lot 10, the wooden stockade fence
referenced in Condition l(d) must be installed and
reviewed by the Town Planner.
b. Roof drains and leach pits must be constructed as shown
on the plan and reviewed by the Town Planner and the
Division of Public Works.
c. The site shall be continuously reviewed by the Planning
Board and Staff. Any additional screening as may be
reasonably required by the Planning Board shall be
added at the applicant ' s expense.
d. All disturbed areas on the lot in question must be
stabilized.
e, All site amenities associated with the lot in question
shall be installed, (ie, fences, landscaping, walkways
and driveways)
f. The lot must be raked, loamed and seeded; sodded; or
mulched if weather conditions do not permit seeding or
sodding,
3
6. Prior to the final release of security, the conditions
outlined in the Meadowood III Definitive Subdivision
Conditional Approval must be followed.
7 . A complete set of signed plans, a copy of the Planning Board
decision and a copy of the Conservation Commission "order of
Conditions" must be on file at the Division of Public works
prior to issuance of permits for connections to utilities,
8 . The applicant shall adhere to the following requirements of
the Fire Department:
a. All proposed structures are to contain residential fire
sprinkler systems in conformance with the North Andover
Fire Department.
9 . Any action by a Town Board or Commission or Department which
requires changes in the roadway alignment, drainage
facilities, grading or no- cut lines may subject this
decision to a modification by the Planning Board.
10. The provisions of this conditional approval shall apply to
and be binding upon the applicant, its employees and all
successors and assigns in interest or control .
11. All construction shall commence within two (2) years from
the date of this approval, August 24,, 1996 and shall be
completed within five (5) years from the date of this
approval August 24 , 19.99. If construction has not commenced
or been completed in this time frame this decision will be
automatically rescinded.
12 . This Special Permit approval is based upon a Definitive
Subdivision Conditional Approval . The Special Permit and
Definitive Subdivision approvals are both based upon the
following information:
Plans: Special Permit and Definitive Plans
Meadowood III
North Andover, Mass.
owner and
Developer: Hillside Realty Trust
P.o. Box 6700 -Suite 209
North Andover, Mass.
Prepared by: Merrimack Engineering Services, Inc.
66 Park Street
North Andover, MA
Sheet 1: Title Sheet
April , 1994
Sheet 2 : Property Line Plan
April, 1994 ; rev. 8/3/94
Sheet 3 : Grading Plan
4
April, 1994 ; rev. 8/3/94
Sheet 4 : Plan & Profile
April, 1994 ; rev. 8/3/94
Sheet 5: Detail
April, 1994
= Sheet 6: Conditions of Approval
April, 1994
cc. Conservation Administrator
Director of Public Works
Health Administrator
Building Inspector
Police Chief
Fire Chief
Assessor
Applicant
Engineer
File
Meadowoodlll .R6
5