Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-12-10 Conservation Commission Minutes Approved 01/14/2026 Albert P. Manzi Jr., Chair Bradley S. Mustain John T. Mabon, Vice Chair Marissa Valentino Sean F. McDonoughMatthew Bohenek David F. White Town of North Andover North Andover Conservation Commission December 10, 2025 Members Present: Matthew Bohenek, Marissa Valentino, Sean F. McDonough, Albert P. Manzi Jr., Chairman, Bradley S. Mustain, and David F. White Members Absent: John T. Mabon, Vice Chairman Staff Members Present: Amy Maxner, Conservation Administrator and Alexyss Langevin, Conservation Field Inspector/Planner Meeting came to Order at: 7:03 p.m. Quorum Present. Pledge of Allegiance Chair Albert Manzi Jr. will only cast a vote in the event of Newly Revised 12th ed., §4:56 Acceptance of Minutes A motion to accept the minutes of November 12, 2025, as drafted was made by Mr. White, seconded by Mr. Bohenek Vote 3-0, Unanimous. Certificate of Compliance 242-1833, Sewer Rehabilitation Project, Ipswich, Morningside & Flagship (N. Andover DPW) The Administrator stated the January 2022 Order of Conditions governed sewer rehabilitation work on Morningside Lane and Ipswich Road. The work has been completed, all disturbed areas are stabilized, and a letter from the project engineer certifying compliance was submitted. She recommended issuance of a full and final Certificate of Compliance with ongoing conditions as applicable. Michael Camadeco of Woodard & Curran was present. A motion to issue a full and final Certificate of Compliance was made by Mr. Mustain and seconded by Mr. Bohenek. Vote 3-0, Unanimous. Documents 2025.11.03_Compliance Letter, Record Drawings_ North Andover Contract No. 1_Stamped, wpafrm8a Certificate of Compliance 242-1672, 492 Sutton Street (Lawrence Municipal Airport) The Administrator stated the Applicant has requested a continuance. A motion to continue to January 28, 2026, was made by Mr. Mustain, seconded by Mr. Bohenek. Vote 3-0, Unanimous. Documents Email from csparages@wsengineers.com requesting a continuance until 01/28/26 Small Project NACC #353, Foster Street ROW (Massachusetts Electric) 7:06 p.m., Mr. McDonough joined the meeting. The Administrator stated the project qualifies as a Small Project Category L and involves installation of one new midspan utility pole with minor vegetation management within the Foster Street ROW, approximately 60 feet from BVW and outside the 50-foot NDZ. She recommended approval with conditions requiring installation of erosion controls (8-inch mulch socks), a pre-construction site visit with the contractor and Conservation staff, and a post-construction site inspection to confirm compliance and approve removal of erosion controls. Nate Goshgarian of LEC Environmental Consultants stated the work involves installation of an additional midspan pole between two existing poles with work expected to take 4-5 hours to complete. A m McDonough and seconded by Mr. Mustain. Vote 4-0, Unanimous. Documents Small Project Application Checklist, Small Project Permit_Foster Street Modification 242-1917, 989 Salem Street (Moriarty) The Administrator noted there was no Applicant representation present. The Applicant had surgery and was unable to attend, and the project engineer is no longer with the firm. The Administrator advised the Applicant that the Commission could either hear the matter or continue it if questions arose. Mr. Manzi noted that many Commission members are familiar with the site and stated that, if the Applicant did not object, the Commission could hear the modification request. The Administrator summarized the October 2025 Order of Conditions, which approved driveway rehabilitation and expansion, front steps and walkway, grading, and a retaining wall with mitigation plantings, including waivers within the 25-foot NDZ and 50-foot NBZ. The Applicant is requesting a Modification due to an error in the approved plan showing the retaining wall location. The proposed plan relocates the wall closer to the wetland than originally shown on the approved plan, eliminates proposed pavement in favor of grading and lawn, adds seeding on slopes, and proposes two 8x8 sheds outside the 50-foot NBZ with roof drip edges. Additional changes include relocation of an existing underground utility line and the addition of 475 square feet of mitigation plantings, reducing lawn area within the 25-foot NDZ. A waiver is requested primarily for the retaining wall. Mr. White confirmed that the approved plan did not show the retaining wall in the correct location and that the revised plan adds two sheds outside the 50-foot buffer and increases mitigation plantings. Mr. Mustain expressed concern that the revised plan increases disturbance closer to the wetland, noting the steep slope and stating he does not support the proposed retaining wall location. The Administrator stated that the proposed wall location was discussed during the site walk and was not reflected correctly on the original plan as discussed on site. Mr. McDonough stated that, while he was present for the site visit, he is not in favor of the retaining wall being located closer to the wetland than previously approved. He indicated that the other proposed changes were acceptable. 7:19 p.m., Ms. Valentino joined the meeting. Mr. Manzi stated that the waiver request centers on the retaining wall and noted that it would be prudent to concerns. A motion to continue to January 14, 2026, was made by Mr. White, seconded by Mr. McDonough. Vote 5-0, Unanimous. Documents 7875 Modification Packet, 7875.WPP.3.REDLINE Notice of Intent (NOI) 242-1922, 121 Millpond, Millpond Townhomes (Verizon New England Inc.) 2025-12-10 Conservation Commission Minutes Page 2 of 9 The Administrator stated the project involves installation of underground conduit from existing electrical cabinets at Buildings 8, 10, 13, and 18. The conduit will be installed 1824 inches below grade, either by trenching (approximately 6 inches wide) or missile boring, to be determined in the field. A waiver request was submitted as work at Buildings 13 and 18 is within the 25-foot No Disturb Zone (NDZ). The Administrator reviewed the wetland delineation in the field and made no changes to the flagging. The Administrator identified Building 13, near Units 8789, as the primary area of concern due to the presence of large trees and exposed root systems that may be impacted by the proposed work. Jarret Bastys of Verdantas, on behalf of Verizon New England, stated the work is to install fiber optic conduit routed behind the buildings through existing cabinets. Proposed erosion controls include silt sock and straw wattles downslope of work areas. All trenches would be closed daily, with permanent stabilization by grass or sod. Mr. White asked whether a Massachusetts-certified arborist had reviewed the trees and requested clarification on the installation methods. Mr. Bastys stated the installation methods are substantially similar, that missile boring is another term for directional drilling, and that an arborist has not been consulted. Mr. McDonough expressed concern regarding potential impacts to tree root systems and asked what analysis had been completed to evaluate those impacts. Mr. Bastys stated no analysis has been completed to date and that the intent is to avoid tree impacts. Ms. Valentino stated the waiver justification lacked sufficient detail and requested additional information, noting that construction convenience alone does not outweigh potential environmental impacts. Mr. Bastys explained the rear routing was selected due to building construction, foundations, garages, and service entry locations, and would avoid excavation and repaving. Mr. Manzi asked whether alternative routes had been considered to avoid trees and eliminate the need for a waiver. Mr. Bastys stated route adjustments are typically addressed in the field. Mr. Manzi stated the Commission prefers routing decisions be resolved during permitting rather than during construction. The Administrator noted the routes for Buildings 8, 10, and 18 were less concerning due to greater separation from vegetation and trenching would be in lawn areas, and reiterated that Building 13 presents the primary concern. Mr. Manzi asked whether the route for Building 13 could be modified. Mr. Bastys stated it could. Mr. White stated concerns remain regarding work within the 25-foot NDZ, potential impacts to root systems supporting the bank, and uncertainty regarding the installation method. Mr. Manzi requested the Applicant return with an alternative route for Building 13 and/or documentation from a Massachusetts-certified arborist. No abutters were present. The Administrator noted receipt of a letter of support from a resident of the complex. A motion to continue to January 14, 2026, was made by Mr. White, seconded by Mr. Mustain. Vote 5-0, Unanimous. Documents Mill Pond TeleComm Work areas 11-26-25, Millpond NOI Submission, Millpond_Verizon_NOI_12.10.2025 Notice of Intent (NOI) 242-1921, 243 Great Pond Road (Boyko) The Administrator stated the project involves removal of an existing sports court and associated gravel and construction of a 24 x 36 greenhouse with utilities, roof infiltration trench, stone path, new deck, raised planting beds, short retaining wall and steps, and a perimeter post-and-rail fence with wire mesh. An internal French drain will connect to the municipal sewer. Electric, gas, sewer, and water connections will be added to the plan. The work is within the 200-foot Riverfront Area, the 100-foot Buffer Zone to BVW, and the 50- foot No-Build Zone. No work is proposed within the 25-foot No-Disturb Zone. A wetland to the north may 2025-12-10 Conservation Commission Minutes Page 3 of 9 contain a potential vernal pool per NHESP; however, its location and extent cannot be verified at this time. It is therefore unknown whether vernal pool setbacks extend into the project area. The fence would be the only element that could fall within any vernal pool setbacks, if applicable. A stormwater peer review is has opened the hearing and held one session. Outstanding items include utility details, impervious surface reduction calculations, a revised greenhouse floor material, and a second peer review letter. John McGeough of McGeough Custom Homes stated he will oversee the project. A two-week continuance details. Rich Kirby of LEC Environmental Consultants submitted full plan sets and stated the 2.5-acre property includes a perennial stream north of the house, placing nearly the entire project within the 200-foot Riverfront Area, except for a small portion within the side yard setback. Removal of the existing sports court will reduce impervious area and degraded Riverfront Area. The greenhouse is located as far from the river as practicable, outside the side yard setback and the 100-foot Buffer Zone, and will be served by a stone infiltration trench on three sides. A granite stepping-stone path will connect the greenhouse to the existing deck, with three raised planting beds along the east side. A 4-foot-high post-and-rail fence with wire mesh is proposed to enclose the backyard. Approximately 14 fence posts would be within the 50-foot Buffer Zone, resulting in approximately two square feet of permanent alteration. No natural vegetation is proposed to be altered. The fence is approximately 85 feet from the potential vernal pool which is conservatively estimated at B18 wetland flag, and aligns with the existing lawn edge. The Administrator confirmed the deck is new. Mr. Manzi stated the Commission has historically not considered fencing to be a structure and, in his opinion, a waiver may not be required. Mr. McDonough confirmed the fence is the only element that would require a waiver. The Administrator noted the fence is located at the 25-foot NDZ on the non-vernal pool side and approximately 85 feet from the potential vernal pool. Mr. Kirby added that the 25-foot Buffer Zone to the wet meadow BVW is already marked in the field and the proposed fence would be in line with or farther from existing conservation markers. Mr. McDonough asked whether the fence could be placed at the 50-foot NBZ. Mr. Kirby stated it could, but this would leave an unused lawn area between the fence and the 25-foot NDZ. Ms. Valentino asked whether the sloped access was for lawn maintenance. Mr. McGeough stated it would be used to move carts of flowers and vegetables. Mr. Mustain stated the stormwater report has not yet been approved and requested that the next plan set show the location of the existing fence relative to the proposed fence. The Administrator reiterated that fertilizer containment was discussed with the Planning Board, including the internal French drain connection to the sewer and the change from a gravel floor to a concrete slab. She stated impervious surface reduction calculations and the second peer review letter are still outstanding. No abutters were present. A motion to continue to January 14, 2026, was made by Mr. McDonough, seconded by Mr. Mustain. Vote 5-0, Unanimous. Documents 11-21-25 Plan Set, 11-25-25 Abutter list, 243 GR_NOI Plans, 251104 HW_1st_Peer Review Letter, Architectural Greenhouse 11-25-2025, NOI Addendum_243 Great Pond Road, NOI Application_243 Great Pond Road, Pages from Great Pond Greenhouse Pricing 11-25-2025, Response to 1st Peer Review 11-21-25, Stormwater Calcs Rev. 11-21-25 Notice of Intent (NOI) 242-19xx, 1591 Osgood Street (Singh Realty Group LLC) The Administrator stated the proposed project includes demolition of the existing structure and removal of paved areas, with construction of a new four-story mixed-use building on a 2.85-acre parcel. The project proposes 112 parking spaces, new utilities, and stormwater management. Stormwater will be managed 2025-12-10 Conservation Commission Minutes Page 4 of 9 through catch basins and two subsurface infiltration chamber systems. Work within the Buffer Zone includes removal of pavement between the wetland and the 50-foot NBZ, with restoration by loaming, seeding, limited grading, and plantings. No structures are proposed within the Buffer Zone. BVW is present on site. The Administrator reviewed the wetland flagging and had no changes. An off-site system was reviewed visually from adjacent property and appeared reasonably delineated. Existing site conditions provide no stormwater treatment. The project will increase impervious area by approximately 10,000 square feet; all impervious surfaces will be treated post construction. The Planning Board has held two hearings and is conducting peer reviews for stormwater (Horsley Witten), civil engineering (Hancock), and traffic (VHB). First-round stormwater and civil comments and responses have been received. Sean Morardi and Houston Hubbart of Jones & Beach were present. Mr. Morardi described one wetland area located along the eastern portion of the site. Existing conditions include degraded asphalt currently used for vehicle storage, with no stormwater management. The project will remove impervious surface from the 100-foot Buffer Zone and fully remove impervious surface from the 50- foot NBZ, which will be regraded and restored with native vegetation. Stormwater will be directed away from wetlands and eventually into the municipal system. The Applicant stated the project represents an environmental improvement over existing conditions. Mr. Hubbart stated the eastern parking area currently lacks curbing and stormwater controls, allowing runoff toward the wetland. The proposal includes curbing around the entire parking area, deep-sump offline catch basins, and an underground chamber system with pretreatment, discharging to Osgood Street. Mr. Mustain stated he will review the stormwater report and noted concerns regarding separation between underground infiltration systems and building foundations, referencing Table AA of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. He also asked whether dumpsters are located within the 100-foot Buffer Zone. Mr. Hubbart confirmed the dumpsters are within the 100-foot Buffer Zone. Mr. Mustain requested the Applicant evaluate alternative dumpster locations outside of the 100-foot Buffer Zone. Ms. Valentino asked whether an analysis was conducted along the north property line to evaluate slope stability and potential breakout from the infiltration system. Mr. Hubbart stated he would review this with the project lead and provide a response. Mr. Manzi asked whether a 21E assessment had been conducted due to long-term vehicle storage and potential oil contamination. He requested confirmation that soils are not impacted. Mr. Morardi stated no 21E report has been completed but agreed to investigate further. Mr. Manzi requested due diligence, including testing or excavation, if necessary, to confirm the absence of contamination. Mr. Morardi agreed to conduct further evaluation. The Administrator requested the addition of mulch socks in wetland and Buffer Zone areas, in conjunction with silt fence, as enhanced erosion control. Mr. McDonough asked how close development would be to the wetland, requested clarification on the mixed- use components, and suggested consideration of physical barriers between development and wetland areas. Mr. Morardi stated the development is being pulled farther from both on-site and off-site wetlands. The mixed-use includes residential, retail, and first-floor storage. Mr. McDonough requested the Applicant consider barriers such as fencing, stone walls, or markers to discourage encroachment beyond the 25-foot NDZ. No abutters were present. A motion to January 14, 2026 was made by Mr. Mustain, seconded by Mr. McDonough. Vote 5-0, Unanimous. Documents 10-15-25_1st_StormwaterPeerReview_1591_OsgoodStreet, 11-13-25 -Hancock Civil Peer Review Letter, 24224-Compiled NOI Package (Rev 11-25-25), 24224-Compiled NOI Package (Rev 11-25-25), 251015_FIRST SW PeerReview_1591_OsgoodStreet, Intro Letter, Maps, O&M Stormwater, EC, Photo Log, Response Letter - Hancock Associates, Response Letter - Horsley Witten Group, Rev. Drainage Report (Rev 11-25-25) 2025-12-10 Conservation Commission Minutes Page 5 of 9 Enforcement Order/Violation 55 South Bradford Street (Chatterjee) The Administrator stated the final outstanding item was installation of wetland posts and markers at the 25- foot NDZ. This was completed by the deadline and verified in the field. A motion to lift the Enforcement Order was made by Mr. White, seconded by Mr. McDonough. Vote 5-0, Unanimous. Documents 09-25-2024 Meeting Materials, 10-22-2025 Meeting Materials, 11-13-2024 Meeting Materials, 12-11-2024 Meeting Materials, 55 South Bradford Wetland Marker install Enforcement Order/Violation 350 Sharpners Pond Road (Perdomo) The Administrator stated the two-year shrub growing period has been completed and the plantings are healthy. Wetland posts were installed in accordance with the Enforcement Order, and a final monitoring report from the wetland scientist has been received. The site is stable and in compliance. The only remaining item is removal of erosion controls. Mr. Mustain asked whether the homeowners were satisfied with the height of the wetland posts. The Administrator stated she discussed this onsite with the homeowner and explained the posts may be cut to two feet above grade. A motion to lift the Enforcement Order was made by Mr. Mustain, seconded by Mr. Bohenek. Vote 5-0, Unanimous. Documents 06-14-2023 Meeting Materials, 07-26-2023 Meeting Material, 09-27-2023 Meeting Materials, 11-16-2022 Meeting Materials, 2, 10-2-25 - Monitoring Report - 350 Sharpners Pond Road, 350 Sharpners Pond Road Photos (10-2-25), Amended Enforcement Order - 350 Sharpners Pond 06 23 23, Proposed Shed Plan - 350 Sharpners Pond Road, Town of North Andover Mail - 350 Sharpners Pond Road Enforcement Order/Violation 242-829, Holt Road Landfill (MassDEP) The Administrator stated she received clarification on the outstanding issues. MassDEP, as the landowner, is awaiting funding to complete design plans. She recommended a continuance to the May 13, 2026 meeting as requested. Mr. Manzi questioned whether the site is currently stable and directed the Administrator to contact MassDEP as soon as possible to request monitoring pending their next activity. He emphasized that timing is critical and requested that the same monitoring standards used for the glass pile at Lawrence Municipal Airport be applied for consistency. A motion to amend the Enforcement Order as discussed was made by Mr. White, seconded by Mr. Mustain. Vote 5-0, Unanimous. A motion to continue to May 13, 2026, was made by Mr. White, seconded by Mr. Bohenek. Vote 5-0, Unanimous. Documents Email from JonesNE@cdmsmith.com requesting a continuance until 05/13/26 Enforcement Order/Violation 105 Hillside Road (Awerman) Maureen Herald of Norse Environmental summarized the history of the Enforcement Order. A second amended EO required removal of portions of a concrete walkway, cutting and relocation of a 4-inch drain pipe, relocation of a play structure outside the 25-foot NDZ, and removal of a shed. The majority of required work has been completed. The approved plan showed removal of approximately 160 sq. ft. of concrete walkway along the side of the dwelling. Although the Commission previously voted that the walkway must be removed, the Applicant requested that two remaining concrete steps and a connection from those steps to 2025-12-10 Conservation Commission Minutes Page 6 of 9 the rear patio be allowed to remain, citing historical aerial photographs and video from a prior owner showing a pre-existing walkway. The Administrator advised that the two steps adjacent to the chimney can reasonably be considered pre- existing at the time of purchase and may be acknowledged. However, the walkway connection to the rear patio was not shown on the existing conditions survey and would be considered new work requiring a separate filing. Commissioners agreed that while limited historical evidence supports the location of the remaining steps, it does not justify reconstruction of the full walkway under the current Enforcement Order. The discussion then turned to the shed. As part of the EO, the shed located within the 25-foot NDZ was removed. A 2006 building permit signed by Conservation staff allowed a shed, with the condition that it be located outside the 25-foot NDZ. The Commission discussed staff authority at that time and agreed the Applicant reasonably relied on the permit, though the prior shed location did not meet the 25-foot NDZ requirement as assigned by staff at that time. The Commission agreed the Applicant may install a shed of similar size, provided it is located outside the 25- foot NDZ. To avoid future compliance issues, staff recommended a pre-construction site visit to review and confirm shed placement. Commissioners agreed they would not fault the current homeowner for past noncompliance by a prior owner, but any new or replacement structure must meet current 25-foot NDZ requirements. A motion to amend the Enforcement Order to allow the existing concrete steps to remain in their current location, deny the proposed walkway connection to the rear patio, and require a pre-construction meeting with Conservation staff to determine shed placement was made by Mr. Mustain, seconded by Mr. McDonough. Vote 5-0, Unanimous. Documents 08-28-2024 Meeting Materials, 09-25-2024 Meeting Materials, 10-09-2024 Meeting Materials, 11-13-2024 Meeting Materials, 12-11-2024 Meeting Materials, 105 Hillside Road - 2nd Amended Enforcement Order 12 11 24, 105Hillside edit1 (1), Email Documentation, Gazebo Permit (2006) 105 Hillside,Norse 11-10-25 request to allow walkway & shed, Property Card, Shed Building Permit #785 - 105 HILLSIDE ROAD 6_12_2006 Enforcement Order/Violation 488 Pleasant Street (Borke/Brecher) The Administrator stated that at the November 12, 2025 meeting the Commission granted a continuance at the chronology summarizing the 2006 house construction project history. Since that meeting, no new information has been received. She noted the property owner attempted to retain a wetland consultant but was unsuccessful. The Administrator summarized the approved planting plan under the original NOI and Order of Conditions, which required reestablishment of a double row staggered hedge of 146 highbush blueberry shrubs along the upslope edge of the 25-foot No Disturb Zone, installation of wetland boundary markers, removal of invasive species, replacement with native shrubs, and seeding of the sewer easement with an upland mix. File records indicate Conservation staff and the project wetland consultant confirmed installation of plantings and markers prior to issuance of the Certificate of Compliance. Mr. Manzi stated the current issue is reestablishment of plantings required by the Order that are no longer present. He confirmed the property owner understands what is being requested. Mr. Brecher stated he believes they have this evening, a planting plan and a Vegetation Management Plan, and that they intend to submit an RDA for a pre-existing floating dock at the January 28 meeting. He stated the dock has been in place for many years and no new work is proposed. He stated vegetation work ceased once concerns were raised and that a revised planting plan was prepared reflecting additional plantings discussed with staff. He stated they are seeking clarity and closure. The Administrator stated she was seeing the proposed planting plan for the first time at the meeting. 2025-12-10 Conservation Commission Minutes Page 7 of 9 Mr. McDonough stated that if the Administrator is comfortable with the proposal, he would be as well. Ms. Valentino and Mr. Manzi expressed similar positions and deferred to Conservation staff review. The Administrator requested additional time to review the planting plan and Vegetation Management Plan, including plant sizes. She also asked whether the Commission wished to require reinstallation of wetland boundary markers at the 25-foot No Disturb Zone, noting prior records indicate they were previously installed. Mr. Brecher stated markers were previously installed but questioned their necessity under current circumstances. He requested a continuance to the January 28, 2026 meeting. Commission members explained the need for the markers to inform agents of the property owner and future Mr. Manzi requested that during the continuance the Administrator review the submissions, coordinate with the property owner as needed, and return to the Commission with a recommendation for final action. A motion to continue to January 28, 2026 was made by Mr. White, seconded by Mr. Mustain. Vote 5-0, Unanimous. Documents 04-23-2025 Meeting Materials, 09-10-2025 Meeting Materials,10-22-2025 Meeting Materials, 12-10-25 Brecher Planting Plan and Veg. Man. Plan Enforcement Order/Violation 265 Granville Lane (Costantino) The Administrator stated the property was recently before the Commission for a permitted front-of-house deck replacement. During construction the contractor severed the main electrical line while excavating the footing in early spring. Unaware of subsequent coordination with the Electrical Inspector, the Administrator later observed a trench having been excavated adjacent to the wetland, running along the driveway and the shoulder of Granville Lane to the electrical box. She contacted the Town Electrical Inspector, required installation of erosion controls, and conducted a follow-up site inspection. After a joint final inspection with the electrical contractor and Electrical Inspector, backfilling was allowed. The work remains substandard and requires further correction. The Town Engineer later reviewed the site from a right-of-way perspective and identified drainage and potential icing issues. An after-the-fact DPW permit may be required for the trench. The area remains mounded, with soil and stone surrounding tree trunks. While the sandy soils have not caused immediate erosion, the condition is not stable long-term. David and Jennifer Costantino, the homeowners, were present. Mr. Costantino stated a landscaper visited last Friday, with additional site visits scheduled this week for estimates. He acknowledged the trench was backfilled quickly during rainy conditions and does not meet expectations. The intent is to scrape the area back, regrade, and restore the site through seeding. The Administrator stated all corrective work must meet DPW specifications and to protect the wetland. She requested that she and the Town Engineer be present during final grading to ensure proper restoration. She recommended seeding with a native seed mix, to be sourced from an approved vendor, applied at an enhanced rate. Specifications would be provided. Mr. Manzi recommended the immediate application of winter rye to stabilize the surface through winter, with final regrading and reseeding in the spring once frost conditions resolve. The Administrator noted DPW would likely require prompt grading to address winter drainage, plowing, and icing concerns. She stated that native seed mixes can overwinter if combined with winter rye and properly blanketed. Continued monitoring for one to two growing seasons would be required, along with extension and proper staking of erosion controls. Mr. Costantino asked whether grading could occur now with seeding deferred until spring, or whether seeding must occur immediately. Mr. Manzi emphasized the need for immediate stabilization using erosion control measures such as jute mesh to prevent washout during winter storms. Ms. Valentino confirmed with the Administrator that the electrical line was buried at sufficient depth and not left mounded for cover. 2025-12-10 Conservation Commission Minutes Page 8 of 9 The Administrator stated the work would proceed under a formal Enforcement Order outlining all directives for the contractor. Mr. Manzi reiterated the priority is immediate stabilization to prevent overwash and sheet flow, with aesthetic improvements to follow in the summer. The Administrator confirmed grading would be coordinated with DPW to ensure proper shoulder restoration. Mr. White requested that regrading expose the tree root collars. A motion to issue an Enforcement Order with the conditions listed on page one of the recommendation, as discussed and amended, was made by Mr. White and seconded by Mr. Mustain. Vote 5-0, Unanimous. Documents Back fill of trench, Open Trench Pics, Violation Letter - Trench Excavation 265 Granville 12-3-25 Adjournment A motion to adjourn at 9:03 p.m. was made by Mr. McDonough, seconded by Ms. Valentino. Vote 5-0, Unanimous. 2025-12-10 Conservation Commission Minutes Page 9 of 9