HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/20/2025 - 1st HWG Stormwater Peer Review - - 430 OSGOOD STREET %�.
Horsley Wiften Group
0
SLIStainable, Ehvirownental Solutions
112 W'at r `tr t-61 Floor-Boston,MBA 02109 ..........
5 -2 1 ho,r 1 ten
February 20, 2025
Ms. Jean Enright, Planning Director
North Andover Planning Board
120 Main Street
North Andover, Massachusetts 01845
Ref: Initial Stormwater Peer Review
North Andover Public Schools
North Andover High School Athletic Campus Improvements
430 Osgood Street, North Andover, Massachusetts
Mass DEP File No. 242-1906
Dear Ms. Enright and Board Members:
The Horsley Witten Group, Inc. (HW) is pleased to provide the North Andover Planning Board
with this letter report summarizing our initial review of the Stormwater Management Report and
Site Plans for the proposed athletic field improvements at the North Andover High School
located at 430 Osgood Street, North Andover, MA. The Site Plans and Stormwater
Management Report were prepared by Gale Associates, Inc. on behalf of North Andover Public
Schools (Applicant). The Applicant is proposing to make several improvements to the existing
athletic facilities at the North Andover High School campus, including the installation of a
multipurpose synthetic turf field with a stone base and subsurface drainage system,
reconstruction of existing tennis courts, and installation of a shot put and discus cage. Additional
site improvements include new fencing, walkways, athletic lighting, drainage improvements, and
wetland restoration.
The watershed area evaluated consists of 7.865 acres. Under existing conditions there are
1.403 acres of impervious area that include the tennis courts, concrete pads, sidewalks and a
portion of Wayne Street adjacent to the athletic field. Under proposed conditions the impervious
area associated with tennis courts, concrete pads, sidewalks, and roadway increases to 1.53
acres. An additional 3.23 acres of synthetic fields are proposed which have been correctly
modeled as impervious. A portion of the proposed work site is within the 100-foot buffer zone of
the onsite bordering vegetated wetland (BVW) and the bank of the intermittent stream located
adjacent to the tennis courts. The installation of one light pole is within the 200-foot riverfront
area of the Cochichewick River. The proposed work involving the replacement of the tennis
courts is within the 25-foot No Disturbance Zone (NDZ) and the 50-foot No-Build Zone (NBZ).
The project will require an Order of Conditions from the North Andover Conservation
Commission.
The proposed stormwater management elements include a stone base system to capture and
manage the stormwater from the artificial turf field and replacement of a failed culvert.
The following documents and plans were reviewed by HW:
• Limited Site Plan Review Application and Accompanying Stormwater Management
Report, North Andover High School Athletic Campus Improvements, North Andover
r � [f n. t- I, " ii tte n G ro u p �IM Horsley W'Itten Group, [iris.
Town of North Andover
February 20, 2025
Page 2of7
Public Schools (Applicant), prepared by Gale Associates, Inc., dated January 22, 2025
(240 pages, including 11 attachments).
Stormwater Management Design Peer Review
HW offers the following comments concerning the stormwater management design as per the
Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook (MSH) dated February 2008, and the North Andover
Chapter 165 Stormwater Management and Erosion Control Bylaw (Bylaw), and the Chapter 250
Stormwater Management and Erosion Control regulations (Stormwater Regulations) adopted
June 21, 2022.
In accordance with Stormwater Regulations, Article V -Applicability, §250-9 activities entailing
land disturbance of over 43,560 square feet must obtain a Land Disturbance Permit. In
accordance with the Stormwater Regulations, Article VI - Stormwater Management Plan, §250-
21. B. The Stormwater Management Plan shall be designed to meet the most recent version of
the Massachusetts Stormwater Standards. Therefore, we have used the Massachusetts
Stormwater Standards as the basis for organizing our comments. However, in instances where
the additional criteria established in §250-23 of the North Andover Code requires further
recommendations, we have referenced these as well.
1. Standard 1: No new stormwater conveyances (e.g., outfalls) may discharge untreated
stormwater directly to or cause erosion in wetlands or waters of the Commonwealth.
a. The Applicant has analyzed the pre- and post-development stormwater runoff to three
design points (DP).
i) DP-1 is the Bordering Vegetated Wetland (BVW) series #2, located southwest of the
existing baseball field portion of the site, next to the Chochichewick River. Under
existing conditions, it appears that runoff from the existing baseball field sheet flows
overland in a southwest direction towards the BVW at DP-1, while a portion of the
field drains to Wayne Street, where it flows along the gutter line to an opening in the
curb that is sloped towards the wetland. Under proposed conditions, runoff from the
synthetic turf field enters the base stone beneath it, where it can infiltrate into the
subsurface soils or be conveyed through the subsurface flat panel drains piped to a
proposed outlet control structure (OCS) on the southside of the field. The OCS
discharges via a 12-inch pipe into an existing DMH. Runoff from the areas
surrounding the proposed synthetic turf field continues to flow overland in a
southwest direction toward the BVW at DP-1. HW recommends that the Applicant:
(1) Confirm where the existing catch basins drain to.
(2) Confirms what the "apparent manhole" and "apparent OCS/sediment trap" are
and where they discharge to (noted on page C001 Baseball Existing Conditions
Plan).
(3) Clarifies the grading and purpose of the proposed 3/4-inch stone swale along the
north side of the baseball field.
ii) DP-2 is the BVW series#4 and series #7, at the bank of the intermittent stream
adjacent to (west of) the tennis court area, a 24-inch failed culvert connects the two
wetlands. The intermittent stream flows southerly through a 24-inch culvert into
Cochichewick River. The proposed project includes removal of the failed culvert and
0 MI'l 181 Ilh.....11l Ilh.....11l ii:III
�
..... II I � II,��,.�
�� lo�°„m � � oir 2 0 ' I � il�i �� hI� . i :
Town of North Andover
February 20, 2025
Page 3of7
the restoration of the adjacent wetlands to reestablish the intermittent stream. Under
existing conditions, runoff from the existing tennis courts and surrounding area flows
northwest into the BVW at DP-2. Under proposed conditions, the surface areas
remain largely the same, except for the relocation of the access walkway.
iii) DP-3 is the BVW series #8 associated with an intermittent stream that flows
southerly along the eastern portion of the property boundary, starting from the area
adjacent to (east of) the existing track and field facility, and flowing south past the
tennis courts, eventually discharging to the Cochichewick River. Under existing
conditions, runoff from the existing shotput venues and surrounding grassed areas
flows in an easterly direction into the BVW at DP-3. Under proposed conditions,
conditions remain largely the same.
2. Standard 2: Stormwater management systems shall be designed so that post-development
peak discharge rates do not exceed pre-development peak discharge rates.
a. HW has reviewed the Existing and Proposed Drainage Conditions figures and the
HydroCAD model. The subcatchment areas, surface materials, curve numbers, times of
concentrations, and flow patterns appear reasonable. No further action is requested.
b. Per §250-23 A. (1) of the North Andover Stormwater Regulations, Low-impact
development (LID) site planning and design strategies must be implemented to the
maximum extent feasible. The Applicant has incorporated LID techniques in the
proposed project, including installation of a stone base and subsurface drainage system
for the artificial turf field. HW recommends that the Applicant document other LID options
it considered for the Project Area.
c. In accordance with §250-23 E. (19) the Applicant must utilize the 24-hour rainfall data
taken from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14 for the
rainfall precipitation depths. These values are 2-year, 3.16 inches; 10-year, 5.00 inches;
and 100-year, 7.93 inches. The Applicant's rainfall events were obtained from the
Northeast Regional Climate Center (NRCC), which differ slightly from the regulations (2-
year, 3.13 inches; 10-year, 4.79 inches; 100-year, 8.83 inches. HW recommends that
the Applicant utilize the higher of the two references. HW notes that the Applicant used
the 1-year event instead of the 2-year event in the existing conditions model.
d. HW notes that there is a rectangle on the drawings on the athletic field near the access
driveway that appears to be labeled Approx. Location of Subsurface Detention Basin.
HW recommends that the Applicant clarify the rectangle and the callout.
e. In accordance with §250-23 E. (11) the pre- and post-development peak rates and
volumes of stormwater should be calculated. The Applicant has provided the peak flows
for the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year storm events, as shown in Table 6.2.3 within
Section 6 of the application narrative. The hydrology report provides pre-development
estimates for 1-year, 10-year and 100-year events, and post-development estimates for
2-year, 10-year and 100-year events. HW recommends that the Applicant provides the
2-year estimate for existing conditions. These calculations show that post-development
rates do not exceed pre-development rates, with the exception of flows to DP-3 for the 2-
year and 100-year storm events. However, these differences are negligible. HW has
provided the peak flows and peak volumes in the tables below from the hydrology
reports provided. The volume of runoff to DP-1 decreases and volumes to DP-2 remain
(I„. V .. �' �,
�� � � ��� � III��..iii lll� I�iir��� � .iii ��l � � I�Ilh.....11l Ilh.....11l ii:III
�
..... II I � ��,.�
�� lo�°„m � oir 2 0 ' I � �� � il�i �� hI� . i :
Town of North Andover
February 20, 2025
Page 4 of 7
stable. Runoff volumes to DP-3 increase slightly.
Design Point - 1
Storm Existing Flow Proposed Flow Existing Proposed
Frequency Rate (cfs) Rate (cfs) Volume (af) Volume (af)
2-Year 2.1 1.7 X 0.149
10-Year 6.2 4.8 0.713 0.383
100-Year 17.9 12.8 2.171 1.370
Design Point - 2
Storm Existing Flow Proposed Flow Existing Proposed
Frequency Rate (cfs) Rate (cfs) Volume (af) Volume (af)
2-Year 3.1 3.1 X 0.212
10-Year 4.6 4.6 0.353 0.353
100-Year 7.9 7.9 0.693 0.693
Design Point - 3
Storm Existing Flow Proposed Flow Existing Proposed
Frequency Rate (cfs) Rate (cfs) Volume (af) Volume (af)
2-Year 0.5 0.6 X 0.040
10-Year 1.0 1.0 0.076 0.082
100-Year 2.1 2.2 0.188 0.196
3. Standard 3 requires that the annual recharge from post-development shall approximate
annual recharge from pre-development conditions.
a. The Applicant has conducted 5 test pits within the proposed artificial turf field area. The
test pits indicate refusal between 4.5 to 5 feet from the surface, due to the density of the
glacial till present throughout the site. Redoximorphic features were observed in TP-5 at
2 feet below the surface. The Test Pit Memo from Nobis notes that they encountered a
perched water table and at test pit TP-3 it seeped into the bottom of the test pit resulting
in over a foot of standing water. There are no test pits within the other athletic facility
areas, but a total of eighteen (18) test borings at the proposed lighting locations are
planned and in progress, including 4 at the track field, 2 at the stadium, 8 at the
proposed synthetic turf field, and 4 at the tennis courts. HW recommends that the
(5 MI'l 181 Ilh.....11l Ilh.....11l ii:III
�
..... II I � ��,.�
�� lo�°„m � oir 2 0 ' I � � �� � il�i �� hI� . i :
Town of North Andover
February 20, 2025
Page 5 of 7
Applicant provide the results of the additional borings once completed.
b. The Applicant has included recharge calculations in Section 6.3 of the Stormwater
Report indicating that the total amount of impervious surface in the Project Area of
66,647 sf, requires 1,002 cubic feet of recharge volume. The Applicant has stated that it
is providing approximately 44,865 CF of storage. The HydroCAD model indicates that
the Turf Base Stone field has available storage of 32,465 CF. HW recommends that the
Applicant clarify the value of 44,865 CF.
c. The Applicant has provided a detail of the Turf Field sections on Sheet C503. HW
recommends that the Applicant add elevations to the sections. The Applicant has
included a note on Detail 1 stating that the trenches shall be over excavated by 12
inches in all directions. HW recommends that the Applicant clarify the estimated
elevation of the perched water table and confirm it will over excavate below it.
d. The Applicant has noted that the bottom of the turf field's base stone is 2 feet above the
estimated seasonal high groundwater (ESHGW) table. HW was not able to confirm the
ESHGW and request that the Applicant clarify how it was determined.
e. HW recommends that the Applicant clearly address questions raised by the
Conservation Agent regarding how the stormwater infiltrating through the proposed
artificial turf field will behave over the dense layer of glacial till that is present throughout
the site.
f. HW notes that in the Nobis Engineering Geotechnical Report the saturated hydraulic
conductivity rate for TP-4 is listed as 0.463 iph within the glacial till layer. Further noted
by Nobis is that the MassDEP Stormwater Standard requires a minimum factory of
safety of 2 be applied to field-derived values. In accordance with volume 3, Chapter 1,
page 13 of the MSH, HW recommends that the Applicant use an exfiltration rate of 1/2
times 0.463 iph (0.2315 iph) in the HydroCAD model and in the drawdown calculations.
4. Standard 4 requires that the stormwater system be designed to remove 80% Total
Suspended Solids (TSS) and to treat 1-inch of volume from the impervious area for water
quality.
a. The Applicant has provided a TSS worksheet within the Pre and Post Development
Hydrology Reports (see Attachment 7 of Application). The TSS worksheet illustrates that
the proposed synthetic turf field will provide 80% TSS removal with the proposed
infiltration basin. HW concurs with the percent removal as designed.
b. The Applicant has noted that the impervious area proposed within the Project Area
consists of sidewalks, tennis courts and concrete pads that are not subject to vehicle
loading. HW notes that an existing section of Wayne Street is within the catchment area.
It is not clear how this portion of the road is being managed and if there is any
opportunity to treat this runoff prior to discharging into the wetland.
c. HW recommends that the Applicant address the Phosphorous removal calculations in
accordance with §250-23 C. (1) of the North Andover Stormwater Regulations.
5. Standard 5 is related to projects with a Land Use of Higher Potential Pollutant Loads
(LUHPPL).
a. The Project Area is not considered a LUHPPL. Standard 5 is not applicable.
0 MI'l 181 Ilh.....11l Ilh.....11l ii:III
. i . °
h..... II I c q,.o do lo�°„m �I � oir 2 0 '� � S L III �� :
Town of North Andover
February 20, 2025
Page 6of7
6. Standard 6 is related to projects with stormwater discharging into a critical area, a Zone 11, or
an Interim Wellhead Protection Area of a public water supply.
a. The proposed development is not discharging near or into a critical area, Zone II or an
IWPA area. Standard 6 is not applicable.
7. Standard 7 is related to projects considered Redevelopment.
a. This project can be considered a mix of new and redevelopment. The redeveloped
portion of the project is required to comply with the Stormwater Management Standards
to the maximum extent practicable for Standards 1-6. The increased impervious area is
required to comply with the 10 Standards. The Applicant is intending to comply fully with
the 10 standards.
b. The redevelopment project, as proposed, appears to comply with the Stormwater
Management Standards and will improve existing conditions.
8. Standard 8 requires a plan to control construction related impacts including erosion,
sedimentation, or other pollutant sources.
a. The Applicant has acknowledged that a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
is required by EPA and noted that the contractor will provide a SWPPP for construction
related activities prior to the start of construction. The Planning Board may choose to
require a final signed SWPPP a minimum of 14 days prior to land disturbance.
b. The Applicant has included details of a construction entrance, erosion matting, 12-inch
silt sock, stockpile area, temporary construction fencing for dust control, loam and seed,
and inlet protection as part of the proposed erosion control measures in the Permit Plan
Set (Attachment 10). The Erosion Control Plan for each athletic facility shows the
locations of silt sock sediment controls and potential staging/stockpile areas. The
Operation & Maintenance (O&M) Plan includes further details and directions for erosion
control in "Section I: Construction Activities."
9. Standard 9 requires a Long-Term Operation and Maintenance (O & M) Plan to be provided.
a. The Applicant has provided an Operation and Maintenance Plan as Attachment 8 of the
Stormwater Management Report. The O&M Plan can be removed from the Stormwater
Management Report and used as a standalone document by the property owner. The
North Andover Public Schools may have a separate O&M Plan for the other existing
facilities at the High School Athletic Campus, including another artificial turf field that was
previously installed. If feasible, combining the O&M Plan for this project with the existing
O&M Plan for the entire property would be beneficial.
b. HW recommends that the Applicant include a simple sketch with callout for the various
stormwater practices that require long term inspections and maintenance.
c. HW recommends that the Applicant specify the party or parties responsible for the
routine inspection and maintenance of the BMPs.
d. HW recommends that the Applicant include an estimated operations and maintenance
budget within the O&M Plan.
e. HW notes that the North Andover Conservation Agent has requested that the Applicant
specify what maintenance activities, exactly, are included as "preventative maintenance"
(5 MI'l 181 Ilh.....11l Ilh.....11l ii:III
�
..... II I � ��,.�
�� lo�°„m � oir 2 0 ' I � �� � il�i �� hI� . i :
Town of North Andover
February 20, 2025
Page 7of7
for the turf field as noted on page 2 of the O&M Plan.
f. HW notes that the North Andover Conservation Agent has requested that the Applicant
specify whether the maintenance of manholes and cleanouts for the synthetic turf field
be done with a vacuum truck or another method (see pg. 2 of the O&M Plan).
g. HW recommends that the Planning Board consider requesting receipt of a signed O&M
Plan as a condition of approval.
10. Standard 10 requires an Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement be provided.
a. A template for an illicit discharge compliance statement is included in the Operation and
Management Plan. The Applicant has noted that a completed statement will be
submitted by the contractor prior to the discharge of stormwater to the postconstruction
Stormwater Management System. HW recommends that the Planning Board request
receipt of an Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement signed by the property owner prior
to land disturbance.
Conclusions
HW recommends that the Planning Board requires that the Applicant provide a written response
to address these comments as part of the Board's review process. The Applicant is advised that
the provision of these comments does not relieve him/her of the responsibility to comply with all
Town of North Andover Codes and By-Laws, Commonwealth of Massachusetts laws, and
federal regulations as applicable to this project. Please contact Janet Bernardo at 508-833-6600
or at jbernardo@horsleywitten.com if you have any questions regarding these comments.
Sincerely,
HORSLEY WITTEN GROUP, INC.
41,
It a
may. .
�"
Janet Carter Bernardo, P.E.
Principal
(5 MI'l 181 Ilh.....11l Ilh.....11l ii:III
�
..... II I � ��,.�
�� lo�°„m � oir 2 0 ' I � �� � il�i �� hI� . i :