Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/18/2020 - TEC Traffic Peer Review #3 - - 1416 Daaoeil ,IRoad Andlover, MA 011810 9718.794.1792 TheEngineeringCorp.,corn Create J J Innovate TEE7 The Engineering Corp Ms. Monica Gregoire September 18, 2020 Staff Planner Planning Department Town of North Andover 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 Ref.: T0758.10 Re: Peer Review#3 - Traffic Review (TIAS Addendum) 1600 Osgood Street Dear Ms. Gregoire: On behalf of the Town of North Andover, TEC, Inc. (TEC) reviewed addendum documents as part of the transportation engineering peer review for the proposed e-commerce fulfillment development located at #1600 Osgood Street in North Andover, Massachusetts. Langan Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc. submitted the following revision documents on behalf of 1600 Osgood Street, LLC (the"Applicant"),which TEC reviewed for conformance with the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaws and generally accepted industry standards: • Addendum to Traffic Impact and Access Study —1600 Osgood Street — North Andover, Massachusetts; prepared by Langan Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc., September 10, 2020. Upon review of the documents and plans, TEC has compiled the following comments for the Board's consideration: Traffic Impact and Access Study 1. TEC has reviewed the Addendum for general conformance with the Town of North Andover Zoning Bylaw and consistency with the previous TIAS as submitted by the project. Upon review, TEC finds that the TIAS addendum and additional scope work requested by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) overall do not significantly alter the results as presented in the original TIAS. 2. Based on requests from MassDOT, who has jurisdiction over Osgood Street, the Applicant will provide the following additional improvements within the public right-of-way as described in their MassDOT Mitigation Letter (unless retracted by MassDOT): a. Convert both the two site unsignalized driveways to right-in/right-out only with a channelized island to reinforce the turn restrictions; b. Provide a MBTA standard bus bay and bus shelter on the west side of Osgood Street; [does not affect traffic operations analysis] c. Construct a shared-use-path extending from the North Signalized Driveway to the South Signalized Driveway with connection signage and striping; [does not affect traffic operations analysis] T:\T0758\T0758.10\Docs\Letters\T0758.10 WW Traffic PR Review#3.docx 1600 Osgood Street - North Andover, MA 'TEC; Peer Review#3 —Traffic Review (TIAS Addendum) TheEngineering C r September 18, 2020 Page 2 of 2 d. Resurface Osgood Street within the area of widening; [does not affect traffic operations analysis] e. Provide a 250-foot northbound left-turn lane at the North Signalized Driveway; and f. Provide a 150-foot southbound left-turn lane at the South Signalized Driveway to oppose the originally proposed northbound left-turn lane; 3. The capacity and queue analysis analyze the signalized intersections using the Synchro Percentile Delay methodology instead of the industry standard Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2010 or 6t" Edition methodology. This was acceptable by TEC within the original review. 4. Although the overall delay and volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio are generally unchanged from the results in the original TIAS; Langan has showed that the queues along the Osgood Street mainline will more than double for some movements as a result of the added volumes at the signalized locations. For instance: a. The 95t" percentile queue increasing from 430-feet to 778-feet for Osgood Street SB at the North Signalized Driveway in the weekday morning (corridor peak). b. The 95t" percentile queue increasing from 93-feet to 293-feet for Osgood Street SB at the South Signalized Driveway in the weekday morning (corridor peak). c. The 95t" percentile queue increasing from 153-feet to 316-feet for Osgood Street NB at the South Signalized Driveway in the weekday evening (corridor peak). d. These are jump the most notable examples and also may be reflected in the 50tn percentile queue as well. Although storage may be provided along the mainline corridor, the Applicant should provide information on how these increased queues effect other driveway and roadway locations. Please do not hesitate to contact me directly if you have any questions concerning our comments at 978-794-1792. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, TEC, Inc. "The Engineering Corporation" amuel W. Gregorio, E, PTOE, RSP, Senior Design Engineer—Transportation Planning & ITS T:\T0758\T0758.10\Docs\Letters\T0758.10 Traffic PR Review#3.docx Enginelering