Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/24/2020 - Langan Response to TEC's Peer Review - - 1450 Osgood Street SMOLAK & VAUGHAN LLP Eitan Goldber&Chair lair Board February 18,2020 3, Memorandum,dated January 24,2020,from rBm O'NeAl and Nate Kirschner of Langan Engineering tO TEC,Inc.to Monica Gregoire,Town of North Andover(Response W TRUS-Definitive Subdi i ion Reijew Comments,daltd. mber 15,2 (n n I A On'IA i.vnl A/VfiA/V : :m and: o.m.. 888 Bo on StrM Suite 510 Boston,MA 02199 T:617-SMIOO To: Monica Gregoire Town of North Andover From: Tim "l eill, P.E. Nathan Kirschner Copied: Peter F. Elll e TEC Mac l tsey H111 ood John Srn to Smolak &Vaughn Michael Rosen RIW Date: January 24,, 2020 e; Response to TECIS Derinifive Subdivision Review Comments North Andover Amazon Fulfillment Center 1600 Osgood Street, North Andover,Massachusetts Langan Project No.; 140182701 Please find our responses to your comment memo related to the Application for Definitive Subdivision Approval memo from Peter Ellison of T C dated November 15,2019. Each comment is followed by our response in bold. Section .2.A—The Waiver Requests should be added to the Definitive Subdivision Pleas. Comment Response; The waiver requests have been included to the DeflnItIve Subdivision Plan in sheet CS 03* . Section -5. ;F.( ( )ft) Sh et V8201 s hould include the Contiguous b iidable aree total frontage, and let width for each newly created lot, Lots net meeting these requirements should be designated as a non-building )et". This comment is clerical in nature because future lot line adjustments will result in all lots being buildable. 5 Comment Response:- Contiguous building area, total frontage, and lot width for each newly created lot have lasers added to Sheet VB201. } TC understands that the intent of the Definitive Plans is to create legal frontage for Lot (solar array). The remaining area outside of Lot C will be further consolidated/divided y an A1F plan: { r Comment Response:Noted If J i I i L r s . f F e a i MEMOResponse to Mass DOT District 4 Trip Generation Follow Up Comments October 2 , 21 —Page 2 of In addition to the responses above, we are requesting the following: Waiver r request supplemental to memorandum or r dum from Smolak & Vaughn for "List of Requested Waiver" dated 1 o 1 1 , wh1ch we s filed with the d finit ve subdivision appilcation §255-5.7 Performance Guarantee As a supplement to the waiver list f iled with the Planning Board as a partodefinitive f the subdivision application, we are requesting an additional waver as described below. Section 2 5- . ' (Performance Guarantee) of the subdivision regulations provides that pursuant to MG c.41, 81 U, before endorsement of the Board's approval of a Form C plan, the apry licant haII secure the construction of ways and installation of mun1cipaI services in a n amount s ff i lent to cover the cost of all or a ny agreed-upon portion of such construction and installation and of the subdivision improvements specified in Article vi of these regulations or as may ho n on the Form C plan. The applicant requests a waiver from strict compliance w h this requirement, allowing instead that the Planning Board condition issuance of the final certificate of occupancy for the Lot Project upon completion of the subdivision road, as approved by the Planning Board, which will act as the Applicant's performance guarantee. We trust these responses and revised materials adequately address your comments and concerns. Please feel free to contact us a ( 17) - 1 o0 or it chner@Lan an.eom toniell@Langan.corn with any questions or should you require additional information, anpn.00 a-W\NH data7 14018 701Trojeot DatMarre po ence\Comment Hosponse L tter 1 f -1 1 0 TEC Respome to Definitive S ubd€vislori Comments\T07 ES.1 DOnitive SLjWslon Review I A x { x t f LANGAIV r