HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/19/2022 - Planning Board Meeting Presentation - - 149 MAIN STREET 1 1
Existing Conditions
1/1 VA - �5 I -t - -re-hi�elclt,com 4 IQ. Main 'Z-re-- Anckover MA oet'lecl - 1L
xistin S"Ite
AT,
Unique aspects and development
nuances of existing property:
I_Non-Conforming,existingbank and
-
y yy
*%�R
-
e establish pattern
y -
r y r � ' i .
�xFSNIN
\.,
Corner conclition leverages Master
isR
rt ._. _
\ \: \\. I I I I by providing an 6
\g Plan
0 .\
r N
i"Al "'front r I
E
-4% I'll I\ \ along Mainstreets
\,
\, \
\ - \ \, r i urbanism oafs.
�\ \ \\\
E
k \\\\
\ � \ \\\
\\\ \\\
\ \
\\ Site positioned at edge of General
71
MBusiness District In rear
\\
boundaries,permitting departure r
\\ U I
IN \\
,.
o
metrics residential
\ \\\\ \
\\\\ EA 61 , "i
\\;
IN
\::.\IR
\. X. \:
_ g
\\\ \\\\.
\\,. \\
\, ...,\:: \ \:, \
6 - \ \:
V 49 28,-5 Zl
\.
\ \ \\
\: \
- \. \\
_
---
_-
IS
\
\\\ \\\
y\AA
\y\
yv
.
\. v
WRI
y ,y
y - A, y: f
y
mom mww-
13
7 c
- A4
a
il —_ _-9 _ _ -
a
■
Aer'lal of Site
,\ MESMERISM
vv
v, moot'
110
mg
N
1
w.
v
\\
\\
\\ \\\
\ 'e, \ i
a
- ,'tea? ,_ _ ,
t
-l-:-
ain
over
s _ ma -
y f
Vmiew
■wn Main Street
\\v- NOR
ffiml�
Off",
alf,
\ \ \
\ \
- \
\ \ \\
\\
\ \
\\
\ Jkle \
\ \ \
\ \ \ \ \
„
\\ \
\ \ \\gfl
\ \ \
lmoviw
r
MIME
ON
I INNER,
z
\\\ \
\ \\\
Y
\
z
Q �e
\ ` \
e.
-
e.
t
\\
_ � ndover MA
Voiew r m Main Street
lei
IF
\
\
\
\\
\ \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\\
\ \
\
\
\\\
\\
\\ \\ \ \
\
\\ \\ \\ \
\ \
ld"
\�
Ana — —
t
AN
t
s _ F
\\ _
d
\ \ \,N \`
W
\\
_ v � \ MA
=
- ,
Vmiew
■ ■
R
from Secon in
s
Q o
_ e \R
\\
\\\
a \\\\ \\\\\ `
a \ \
ho
An
ug
a�
U
t�
a
.F. \
e `
_ _ =
Vmiew
wn Secon St reet
r
R
SS.
s -
Iff
At�
kv
NO-
ilk
v
a,
3
� —
s
y \ \ \
t
t
,
c
�\ \ :
_
-
_ _:_
:== _ -re----- \ A =
- _
Vmiew lookmin SeconStreet
u
4
9
a� 17,�_�,
-0ela
. ..
07
a�
.._ �.- ..3-. .� -�. - �. �.'.•• � Ste. - _,.. .: � _�„�.-^ \'�`�.
sy
-
F
t
-
� i I
}
- v ' ga-tg
Esc ss << v F _ - _ f=
Vmiew
n Street entrance
23 A
Oak
IN
I
-
�.a
I,
a
�5
_
g
_
e'
f
f
- ..=
_
�k I
_
4�
r
_ _
- =,-
■
Aer'lal of Site
,\ MESMERISM
vv
v, moot'
110
mg
N
1
w.
v
\\
\\
\\ \\\
\ 'e, \ i
� a
_ 9. Main '"tea _ver MA
-
t �,,
twi
s
m xisting Constraints
-�e Lcom hi e rc L�Q Main �Z-re-t Anckover MA oetF
xistin Site with Geusiness(G ) Co
front setback:
side setback.
N/F
SPENCER,KAREN A.
rear setback +15' a 501
-__----__ EXISTING
ABUTTORS
BUILDING lot coverage maximum. %
height maximum- 451
25.0�
N/F
MAC GREGGR,DAVID G
50 Ancestor Zoning Code's GBD General
Business District burden.
GBD's residential-variety setbacks
significantly limit size of allowable footprint,
V
reduces commercial frontage
9342 SF
#1&4
airy and Secondstreets,limiting roan level
COMMERO
-- DWEL_N_ _ - - commercial square footage,and resulting in
F.F.-93. --_
(TA - last tax revenue for the town.
THRES
n GBD metrics limit site layout exi ility,
encumbering pedestrian&vehicular
.f
°�°.flAL° movement, n squandering an site parking
°
F.F.,��� uARCEL 3
(TAKEN AT spaceopportunities.
114.50
54,86, 17.90'
�.GBD zoning discourages village urbanism
y reducing storefront commerce,increasing
SECOND STREET ® distances en buildings,and aggravating
(PU uC WAY , D) traffic&parking.
_ _ - _ - - _
�r
_ �� — -
s _ �� ,
v
xistin with Do Overlay Constraints
front setback- 1
side setback(residential)- 40
N/F
� SPENCER,KAREN AD
site setback(street): 101
EXISTING
BUILD NG rear setback:
lot coverage xi %
� I
maximum height alla a 45
N/F
MAC GREGOR,DAVID G FAR: 1
f
Improved Zoning 's DOD Downtown
Overlay District.
- -_ -- The DOD stacks along Main and
_- Second streets improve ro rt to 1.4.
--_ Commercial space overall sf and frontage
mt 4
CK 13,401 S_N
IAL
G fie�L benefit significantly.
WMMELL_it�v _
----- (TAKEN ATOLD
®,
22.
t 1 ®e t,Main and Secondstreet
- - -----_-_- as
-- - setbacks reduce ncra c nt of prior
r ire while optimizing footprint
-- - �
for rove on level
��:v
rusage.
___
j
" --�R`�+ zoning encourages village urbanism
y increasing storefront commercial frontage,
17.90' _`
decreasing travel distances between buildings,
and sponsoring a greater number of on-site
SECOND
(P a parking spaces.
uc WAY 1 DE)
ZD
i a-'19 9 0 2 14Q via rMA 04=
_ � _
r ev v
Proposed Site Plan
Of/. VA re-- Anck-Wer MA le MaM jv
eal otentmal
front setback- 1
side setback r si nti Ia 40
N lF
� SPENCER,KAREN AD r
site setback(street): 1
EXISTING
BUILD NG rear setback- 40
lot coverage. %
maximum height allowed- 45
a
MAC �.rR,D„(D v 1 @ -1.9
Ideal site configuration proposed via Special
t l� rd _
Permit:
Observing setbacks aIan ain and
Second streets,Ground Level serves significant
z� ` r�
ornercial Space frontage via at-grade
IC sidewalk access.
COMMERCIAL
DivVELliNG \
F 8
IN _
JAKE AT
w _ ` \ a
aDevelopment footprint promotes feasible
long/narrow mmixed-use residential uil in
as configuration on floors above.
40
- _ cv mmo
e aE a
�� _ xOne-way vehicular circulation
accommodates discrete,additional parkin t®
xmmmmmxn '•
v-. grade beneath building,optimizing site usage.
Vehicle ri ht n turn sequence supports
i elks roadwaysafety.
SECOND STREET s(PU
ro ose G r
Ground I Features.
Varied setbacks(5'-15";av .1 ')for
articulated facades aloe plain and Second
Jestoleum ramwate
collection,bioswale streets offer sizable commercial spaces).
entry Z.Commercial street space/frontage(public
(one way) :� side), n covered/enclosed buildingservices
(private side),organize site neatly to promote
v a
public commercial use in front and diminish
5'green buffer
visual/noise/odor at rearm
s..
3.Building commercial ntri via sidewalk
\: frontage-residential ntries from Second tr t
and parkingarea.
oading
��`�� parking for 35 spats
Parking r a ownsbuilding entry
4® . "site Spots
from lot
� r e of
dire cantr 'raiuis La n n4)
tr h � -
commercial space#1s
—3700SF
outdoor
space
packet commercial space#2 '
park —4100SF
, bike
_ �_
residential entry#1 - -
raorr,
_a exit
(one way)
residential entry'#2
honey locust
street trees from second street
-
_ = — 0 _ _
- v - -- - --
= s - —
v
ro ose ocket a
ayouts
OPTION A OPTION B OPTION C
7,4
Tptuia
� �. I
_
= i
4
g
F
s
K
6 Ce K-
-String lights over plaza adjacent to commercial -Passive seating area tucked away from corner plaza with -Ornamental plantings crated along sidewalk on Main St.
-Specialty concrete paving at entrance and plaza continuous bench and coffee tables -Cafe terrace provides for flexible seating with bordering
-Signage at corner -Integrated seating/signage at corner assuming entry is on bench area
-City standard brick sidewalk is maintained either side of corner -Corner and entry plaza have specialty concrete
-Brick sidewalk is maintained other than at corner and entry -Brick sidewalk is maintained other than at corner and entry
149 MAIN STREET
SCALE IN FEET LANDSCAPE CONCEPTS-CORNER PARK AA
LA/VGAN
NORTH JULY 2022 NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS
_
v s
_ _ r
3a
__ -s a-- -- =
ro ose TY ical Resi e ayout
� Residential Upper Level Features.
Building dimension width feasible to
accomo ate efficient,central,double-loaded
hallway.
r
Z.Ten or eleven units per level, r o in tl
2BR,F ' e One parkingspace and exterior
balcony/outdoor-space per unit.
s
�_w e
unit I2 BR
m
unit 2 ����`
unit 11
2 BR
1 BRom,
unit 3
2 BR
unit 10
�
s
4
1 BR unit 4
2 BR
ti
unit 3
unit 7
2 BR
unit 9 2 BR unit
2 BR unit 6 3 BR \
2 BR ...
a�
19
ProposedMassing on Site
-,7H -L -er MA pe le-re-h'2 0 1 14 Q-. Ma.n Z-re And%jv L
What our Vision Downtown
All
I
0
e\
� � o
4
\\"---'-'\'�"\""-
158 MainStreet 73 Main Street 70 MainStreet - 128 MainStreet
Height p Height 4a Height Height
1
— s
120 MainStreet 109 MainStreet 163 MainStreet 60 Water Street
Height i g Height Height
As Measured i eeri vir ne et I
_ _ _ MA e L
■
Massing
number of stories:
height: `® " Third Floor:
total footprint r® +
HabitableGSF of 1, r r® 7,060SF Commercial
On Site#of Parking:
Floor Area Ratio: 1.43 , Tota I® 20 units
iW GB
,e
e
-
1
m
_e
i
t
-- - _ -
T
-
q
ZoningI I Ing: Massing Approach:
®45' Height 1®45' Height by SP 1. Disguisebuilding i in massing
®Vertical Buildingi i ing Face 2. Diffuse verticali
3. No Story Limitation 3.Three Story by SP Option 1 - Base Building Allowed by Zoning 3. Reduce perceived scale of stories
22 - _ -
0> _ _ ,
■
Massing
number of stories: r r® ) 1BR
height: I-oil Thirdr® )1BR
total footprint )1
HabitableGSF of r® 9,060SF Commercial
On Site#of Parking:
Floor r ti a 1® 1Tota la 30 units
i—�
x
Lj
s
e
F
�a
Q t
Massing Advantages:
e
s
.,
_ e
e
f
Proposedi remphasizeri lit 1®
® i ) 2. Fourth ICI SF added withoutadditional height
® Residential floor to floor dimensionsre multi-bedroom units
®added fourthit iional height Option 2 - 45' with 4 floors 4.Greater ground level commerical
2 3i3= �er�t.-om aarch'
■
Massing once
number of stories: r® )2BR, ) 1)
height: I-oil Thirdr® { }2BRI( (1
total footprint ( ,{ }1 1
HabitableGSF of r® 9,060SF Commercial
On Site r i
Floor Area Ratio: 1.91 ( 1® 33 units
�z
a
a _
_ — _
e
e
e
t
_A
,t
-
\
t.
am
P
4 - _
_Q
_
m
_
m
e i
m
_
s.
t
a..
--. 77'
_ \.
_.. �.
,\. .. s =
_:....
JU
\ c
OR
MW
04
t \
MO
41
Further
ProposediApproach:
® ri
1® height
zontality
® r i additionalheight
® r r i spacer i® i
® i r i opportunities
® Commercialr grouncommerical
Option 3 - 45' with 4 floors, tailored roof line
5 _ -
= s _ �_ ,
■
Massing
milli
\\ IN ,\ \
-
e7
MIND
t
r
l
i
z
_
A
y
z
-
t
t
-
Option 3 - 45' with 4 floors, tailored roof line
5 — _ - 2 - _
s 3 _ %- ,
s - __ _ _ _fear c_m
_ tea}
■
Massing
7
ti
\ \\ �
�J
�'A
�\
\\
\\ \ \ \
\\
\\
r
I.
I
-
F
ON
Im
Option 3 - 45' with 4 floors, tailored roof line
5 « _ - 2 - - it
=
3 _ %- -E s _ _ _ _m
�a
■
Massing
\ \ TUT-FMU
\
ma
UW�
I N
4
l -
_
r� _
V
\ I
\
-
w.
t
t,
a�
s
4 Y c
-
e
v
�E t
Option 3 - 45' with 4 floors, tailored roof line
0
2 _ %_ ,
�a
an ou1.
0-
1/1 VA
n n o r -re-h'elcIt.com L L ge!?8 14 QI. Mai 'Z-re-- Ackve MA oet'lecl - IL