Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/19/2022 - Planning Board Meeting Presentation - - 149 MAIN STREET 1 1 Existing Conditions 1/1 VA - �5 I -t - -re-hi�elclt,com 4 IQ. Main 'Z-re-- Anckover MA oet'lecl - 1L xistin S"Ite AT, Unique aspects and development nuances of existing property: I_Non-Conforming,existingbank and - y yy *%�R - e establish pattern y - r y r � ' i . �xFSNIN \., Corner conclition leverages Master isR rt ._. _ \ \: \\. I I I I by providing an 6 \g Plan 0 .\ r N i"Al "'front r I E -4% I'll I\ \ along Mainstreets \, \, \ \ - \ \, r i urbanism oafs. �\ \ \\\ E k \\\\ \ � \ \\\ \\\ \\\ \ \ \\ Site positioned at edge of General 71 MBusiness District In rear \\ boundaries,permitting departure r \\ U I IN \\ ,. o metrics residential \ \\\\ \ \\\\ EA 61 , "i \\; IN \::.\IR \. X. \: _ g \\\ \\\\. \\,. \\ \, ...,\:: \ \:, \ 6 - \ \: V 49 28,-5 Zl \. \ \ \\ \: \ - \. \\ _ --- _- IS \ \\\ \\\ y\AA \y\ yv . \. v WRI y ,y y - A, y: f y mom mww- 13 7 c - A4 a il —_ _-9 _ _ - a ■ Aer'lal of Site ,\ MESMERISM vv v, moot' 110 mg N 1 w. v \\ \\ \\ \\\ \ 'e, \ i a - ,'tea? ,_ _ , t -l-:- ain over s _ ma - y f Vmiew ■wn Main Street \\v- NOR ffiml� Off", alf, \ \ \ \ \ - \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ Jkle \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ „ \\ \ \ \ \\gfl \ \ \ lmoviw r MIME ON I INNER, z \\\ \ \ \\\ Y \ z Q �e \ ` \ e. - e. t \\ _ � ndover MA Voiew r m Main Street lei IF \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ ld" \� Ana — — t AN t s _ F \\ _ d \ \ \,N \` W \\ _ v � \ MA = - , Vmiew ■ ■ R from Secon in s Q o _ e \R \\ \\\ a \\\\ \\\\\ ` a \ \ ho An ug a� U t� a .F. \ e ` _ _ = Vmiew wn Secon St reet r R SS. s - Iff At� kv NO- ilk v a, 3 � — s y \ \ \ t t , c �\ \ : _ - _ _:_ :== _ -re----- \ A = - _ Vmiew lookmin SeconStreet u 4 9 a� 17,�_�, -0ela . .. 07 a� .._ �.- ..3-. .� -�. - �. �.'.•• � Ste. - _,.. .: � _�„�.-^ \'�`�. sy - F t - � i I } - v ' ga-tg Esc ss << v F _ - _ f= Vmiew n Street entrance 23 A Oak IN I - �.a I, a �5 _ g _ e' f f - ..= _ �k I _ 4� r _ _ - =,- ■ Aer'lal of Site ,\ MESMERISM vv v, moot' 110 mg N 1 w. v \\ \\ \\ \\\ \ 'e, \ i � a _ 9. Main '"tea _ver MA - t �,, twi s m xisting Constraints -�e Lcom hi e rc L�Q Main �Z-re-t Anckover MA oetF xistin Site with Geusiness(G ) Co front setback: side setback. N/F SPENCER,KAREN A. rear setback +15' a 501 -__----__ EXISTING ABUTTORS BUILDING lot coverage maximum. % height maximum- 451 25.0� N/F MAC GREGGR,DAVID G 50 Ancestor Zoning Code's GBD General Business District burden. GBD's residential-variety setbacks significantly limit size of allowable footprint, V reduces commercial frontage 9342 SF #1&4 airy and Secondstreets,limiting roan level COMMERO -- DWEL_N_ _ - - commercial square footage,and resulting in F.F.-93. --_ (TA - last tax revenue for the town. THRES n GBD metrics limit site layout exi ility, encumbering pedestrian&vehicular .f °�°.flAL° movement, n squandering an site parking ° F.F.,��� uARCEL 3 (TAKEN AT spaceopportunities. 114.50 54,86, 17.90' �.GBD zoning discourages village urbanism y reducing storefront commerce,increasing SECOND STREET ® distances en buildings,and aggravating (PU uC WAY , D) traffic&parking. _ _ - _ - - _ �r _ �� — - s _ �� , v xistin with Do Overlay Constraints front setback- 1 side setback(residential)- 40 N/F � SPENCER,KAREN AD site setback(street): 101 EXISTING BUILD NG rear setback: lot coverage xi % � I maximum height alla a 45 N/F MAC GREGOR,DAVID G FAR: 1 f Improved Zoning 's DOD Downtown Overlay District. - -_ -- The DOD stacks along Main and _- Second streets improve ro rt to 1.4. --_ Commercial space overall sf and frontage mt 4 CK 13,401 S_N IAL G fie�L benefit significantly. WMMELL_it�v _ ----- (TAKEN ATOLD ®, 22. t 1 ®e t,Main and Secondstreet - - -----_-_- as -- - setbacks reduce ncra c nt of prior r ire while optimizing footprint -- - � for rove on level ��:v rusage. ___ j " --�R`�+ zoning encourages village urbanism y increasing storefront commercial frontage, 17.90' _` decreasing travel distances between buildings, and sponsoring a greater number of on-site SECOND (P a parking spaces. uc WAY 1 DE) ZD i a-'19 9 0 2 14Q via rMA 04= _ � _ r ev v Proposed Site Plan Of/. VA re-- Anck-Wer MA le MaM jv eal otentmal front setback- 1 side setback r si nti Ia 40 N lF � SPENCER,KAREN AD r site setback(street): 1 EXISTING BUILD NG rear setback- 40 lot coverage. % maximum height allowed- 45 a MAC �.rR,D„(D v 1 @ -1.9 Ideal site configuration proposed via Special t l� rd _ Permit: Observing setbacks aIan ain and Second streets,Ground Level serves significant z� ` r� ornercial Space frontage via at-grade IC sidewalk access. COMMERCIAL DivVELliNG \ F 8 IN _ JAKE AT w _ ` \ a aDevelopment footprint promotes feasible long/narrow mmixed-use residential uil in as configuration on floors above. 40 - _ cv mmo e aE a �� _ xOne-way vehicular circulation accommodates discrete,additional parkin t® xmmmmmxn '• v-. grade beneath building,optimizing site usage. Vehicle ri ht n turn sequence supports i elks roadwaysafety. SECOND STREET s(PU ro ose G r Ground I Features. Varied setbacks(5'-15";av .1 ')for articulated facades aloe plain and Second Jestoleum ramwate collection,bioswale streets offer sizable commercial spaces). entry Z.Commercial street space/frontage(public (one way) :� side), n covered/enclosed buildingservices (private side),organize site neatly to promote v a public commercial use in front and diminish 5'green buffer visual/noise/odor at rearm s.. 3.Building commercial ntri via sidewalk \: frontage-residential ntries from Second tr t and parkingarea. oading ��`�� parking for 35 spats Parking r a ownsbuilding entry 4® . "site Spots from lot � r e of dire cantr 'raiuis La n n4) tr h � - commercial space#1s —3700SF outdoor space packet commercial space#2 ' park —4100SF , bike _ �_ residential entry#1 - - raorr, _a exit (one way) residential entry'#2 honey locust street trees from second street - _ = — 0 _ _ - v - -- - -- = s - — v ro ose ocket a ayouts OPTION A OPTION B OPTION C 7,4 Tptuia � �. I _ = i 4 g F s K 6 Ce K- -String lights over plaza adjacent to commercial -Passive seating area tucked away from corner plaza with -Ornamental plantings crated along sidewalk on Main St. -Specialty concrete paving at entrance and plaza continuous bench and coffee tables -Cafe terrace provides for flexible seating with bordering -Signage at corner -Integrated seating/signage at corner assuming entry is on bench area -City standard brick sidewalk is maintained either side of corner -Corner and entry plaza have specialty concrete -Brick sidewalk is maintained other than at corner and entry -Brick sidewalk is maintained other than at corner and entry 149 MAIN STREET SCALE IN FEET LANDSCAPE CONCEPTS-CORNER PARK AA LA/VGAN NORTH JULY 2022 NORTH ANDOVER,MASSACHUSETTS _ v s _ _ r 3a __ -s a-- -- = ro ose TY ical Resi e ayout � Residential Upper Level Features. Building dimension width feasible to accomo ate efficient,central,double-loaded hallway. r Z.Ten or eleven units per level, r o in tl 2BR,F ' e One parkingspace and exterior balcony/outdoor-space per unit. s �_w e unit I2 BR m unit 2 ����` unit 11 2 BR 1 BRom, unit 3 2 BR unit 10 � s 4 1 BR unit 4 2 BR ti unit 3 unit 7 2 BR unit 9 2 BR unit 2 BR unit 6 3 BR \ 2 BR ... a� 19 ProposedMassing on Site -,7H -L -er MA pe le-re-h'2 0 1 14 Q-. Ma.n Z-re And%jv L What our Vision Downtown All I 0 e\ � � o 4 \\"---'-'\'�"\""- 158 MainStreet 73 Main Street 70 MainStreet - 128 MainStreet Height p Height 4a Height Height 1 — s 120 MainStreet 109 MainStreet 163 MainStreet 60 Water Street Height i g Height Height As Measured i eeri vir ne et I _ _ _ MA e L ■ Massing number of stories: height: `® " Third Floor: total footprint r® + HabitableGSF of 1, r r® 7,060SF Commercial On Site#of Parking: Floor Area Ratio: 1.43 , Tota I® 20 units iW GB ,e e - 1 m _e i t -- - _ - T - q ZoningI I Ing: Massing Approach: ®45' Height 1®45' Height by SP 1. Disguisebuilding i in massing ®Vertical Buildingi i ing Face 2. Diffuse verticali 3. No Story Limitation 3.Three Story by SP Option 1 - Base Building Allowed by Zoning 3. Reduce perceived scale of stories 22 - _ - 0> _ _ , ■ Massing number of stories: r r® ) 1BR height: I-oil Thirdr® )1BR total footprint )1 HabitableGSF of r® 9,060SF Commercial On Site#of Parking: Floor r ti a 1® 1Tota la 30 units i—� x Lj s e F �a Q t Massing Advantages: e s ., _ e e f Proposedi remphasizeri lit 1® ® i ) 2. Fourth ICI SF added withoutadditional height ® Residential floor to floor dimensionsre multi-bedroom units ®added fourthit iional height Option 2 - 45' with 4 floors 4.Greater ground level commerical 2 3i3= �er�t.-om aarch' ■ Massing once number of stories: r® )2BR, ) 1) height: I-oil Thirdr® { }2BRI( (1 total footprint ( ,{ }1 1 HabitableGSF of r® 9,060SF Commercial On Site r i Floor Area Ratio: 1.91 ( 1® 33 units �z a a _ _ — _ e e e t _A ,t - \ t. am P 4 - _ _Q _ m _ m e i m _ s. t a.. --. 77' _ \. _.. �. ,\. .. s = _:.... JU \ c OR MW 04 t \ MO 41 Further ProposediApproach: ® ri 1® height zontality ® r i additionalheight ® r r i spacer i® i ® i r i opportunities ® Commercialr grouncommerical Option 3 - 45' with 4 floors, tailored roof line 5 _ - = s _ �_ , ■ Massing milli \\ IN ,\ \ - e7 MIND t r l i z _ A y z - t t - Option 3 - 45' with 4 floors, tailored roof line 5 — _ - 2 - _ s 3 _ %- , s - __ _ _ _fear c_m _ tea} ■ Massing 7 ti \ \\ � �J �'A �\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ r I. I - F ON Im Option 3 - 45' with 4 floors, tailored roof line 5 « _ - 2 - - it = 3 _ %- -E s _ _ _ _m �a ■ Massing \ \ TUT-FMU \ ma UW� I N 4 l - _ r� _ V \ I \ - w. t t, a� s 4 Y c - e v �E t Option 3 - 45' with 4 floors, tailored roof line 0 2 _ %_ , �a an ou1. 0- 1/1 VA n n o r -re-h'elcIt.com L L ge!?8 14 QI. Mai 'Z-re-- Ackve MA oet'lecl - IL