HomeMy WebLinkAboutRCG ZBA Meeting Presentation 1-20-26 (00310421xBC4F6) - Miscellaneous - 0 Prescott Street 1/20/2026 \ ` . \
\\ 41,
g Zoning Board of Appeals
01,
c earnng,,--#9,: Januar 20jo2026
RM
mo
im
\_ t
=a
AV\ovy. ..._..._g-.
-
\\
l
Agenda
■ Introduction
■ Traffic Presentation
■ Parking Presentation
■ Questions
2
East Mill Residential Development
Zero Prescott Street
North Andover, Massachusetts
Transportation Impact Assessment Summary
Prepared by:
UVanasse &
Associates inc
January 20th, 2026
3
n "
a �
N a I
a,
�e
I
QL
J
rft
VJi
u
7
E I
W II
iI
��s
Existing Conditions Context
Legend:
llninalzed Intersection
It Signalized Intersection
Sidewalk
zMEMO Crosswalk
3 xx`4 Lane Use and Travel Lane Width
ax , hannelized Right-Turn Lane U - 2
0
-
J2 .
IWST MILL
NORTH DRJWWAY
AST MILL
~rGARACE
jo-
A VAL'ON
CAST NORTH ANDOVIER
MILL (SOUS)
m IN
10
MN
E _ 5
Trip Generation
role-
Entering Exiting Total
., Yet
aBased on ITE LUC 221, Multifamily Housing(Mid-Rise): 296 dwelling units.
low
Trip Dispersal
20% Legend: fz 0/0
XX Entering Trips af
(XX) ring Trite 00
133'.
125
NORREST MILL
TH DRIVEWAY FSITO
J 1-15
10 10%
VAL N
EAST NORTH ANDOVER
MILL 7 }
wa
60MI
Transportation Impact Assessment Summary
Prepared in consultation with the Town of North Andover, MassDOT
and was performed in accordance with MassDOT Guidelines. The TIA has
been reviewed by the Town's Peer Review Consultant (VHB), and we are
working to provide written responses to all comments;
With the addition of Project-related traffic, the majority of movements at the
study area intersections were shown to continue to operate at LOS C or
better during the peak periods, which is defined as "acceptable" traffic
operations;
No apparent safety deficiencies were noted with respect to the motor
vehicle crash history at the study area intersections;
The proposed parking supply that will be available after the construction of
the Project is sufficient to accommodate the anticipated peak parking demand
of the existing and proposed uses within the Mill Complex;
Lines of sight to and from the Project site exceed the recommended
minimum distances to function in a safe manner; and
Provided a series of site access and circulation recommendations that
informed the development of the site flan.
8 low
Parking
■ The Mill Subdistrict includes numerous parcels that have
complementary uses and shared parking principles.
■ East Mill , owned by an RCG investor group, consists of 38
residential apartments, 172,000 square feet of commercial
space, and 959 off-street parking spaces.
■ West Mill , owned by a different RCG investor group, consists of
39 residential apartments, 227,000 square feet of commercial
space, and 318 off street parking spaces
■ AvalonBay Communities ("AVB") owns two communities totaling
221 residential apartments with both private parking areas and
shared parking areas. In shared lots, RCG has rights to use 103
parking spaces during business hours in an AVB lot.
■ Zoning also allows for consideration of adjacent on-street
parking , which includes 146 spaces for East Mill .
9 2
0�
Fg
11 GSB4d
a
GAV
E
111
— —
` e .;
MIN - _
'" Miff
Ez
y
asBud a
and
i
East Mill Current Conditions
East Mill has 959 off-street parking spaces on its campus, including
approximately 593 spaces on the two levels of the Garage Building
and 115 spaces on the adjacent surface lot ("Lot J") .
■ The top level of the Garage Building , 308 parking spaces, is
cordoned off due to lack of demand/non-use. These spaces
were at one time rented to Merrimack College, but have not
been needed for the mill uses since 2007.
■ The lower level of the Garage Building is lightly used now. Peak
parking (mid-day, mid-week, bad weather) remains under 100
cars. Typical usage is much lower.
■ Lot J is commercial overflow parking and some shared spaces
with AVB Phase II .
11
East Mill Current Conditions
Under the current approvals, East Mill's parking lots accommodate
uses for a total of 805 parking spaces:
■ 557 parking spaces for the mixed uses at East Mill;
■ 212 spaces for West Mill's mixed uses; and
■ 36 shared parking spaces for residential use during non-
business hours under an easement to AVB Phase II.
12
East Mill Current Conditions
Actual peak parking remains steadily below the current allocated
amounts for a few reasons:
■ Zoning is conservative in its requirements — actual uses need
fewer parking spaces than are prescribed .
■ The mills are currently 80% commercial. Commercial use has
the most intense parking requirements, but those uses are not
all at full capacity at all times and have their own ebb and flow.
■ Peak usage for office tenants is during business hours on
weekdays and peak usage for the residents and restaurants is
at night and on weekends. As the office users vacate parking
spaces at the close of business, residential users utilize the
same spaces as they return from work, meaning they don't need
a new space to be separately provided elsewhere.
13
Proposed Conditions
The Applicant proposes a total of 497 parking spaces on the
Project site, which complies with current zoning for the proposed
mix of residential apartments and provides 1 .7 spaces per unit.
■ This results in 894 overall spaces on the East Mill campus for
zoning purposes, which includes its previously granted allocation
of on-street parking.
■ Shared Parking relief is memorialized in the zoning by Special
Permit and been granted with each new permit on the mill
campuses since 2007.
■ Vanasse Associates, Inc. (VAI) applied industry-standard
methodologies utilized by the Institute for Transportation
Engineers (ITE), which concluded the total proposed parking
should accommodate the combined existing and proposed uses
across the campus post-construction.
14
Proposed Conditions
Additional context and practical considerations:
■ Parking would be available to Project residents in the new
garage at each level of the building , making the garage the most
convenient location for new residents to park. It would also be
the least convenient location for the mill building users to park
and likely only a last resort.
■ Given the adjacent parking lots are still heavily weighted toward
daytime use, in the unlikely event that 497 spaces weren't
sufficient for the residential tenants, residents could simply park
in the adjacent mill building lots.
■ RCG affiliates own the adjacent mill buildings and have an
interest in preserving sufficient parking for the businesses there.
■ Building additional parking areas would have unnecessary
negative impacts.
15
/ /
J/ J /
Ll1r
��� f,
1 /
/
/r
I /
P
1
1 ,
I rl
JJ � ,
/ l
/ l / I
i � J
//r , ,r
/U>P,�11111D11����i�rhlllllllll6; /�r �/��� ��l
r
r r /
////%///,//, mpu %loll / ///�� ��/ �•j r
/�
/i%%/
JJI
'y:�
� ��P4
( ,.. �I�,��(�JJ�f'��IJ{jJ�jII/„,,::: / a.....,,,r�Yf I. ./ rr�ll/r / ..;,�,. �II G��✓/,„// ,, // ,,, � / I
(,yl�,;
/ 0 1 lrT
,,,,,I� Ott
r /
/ r /
//
// r // r r/ f,
rl,
/
lr I /
1 r ,
/ l
/�fl� ;� ,,,✓ / �ir/�� a ��t1//%/r0 Ylll..
/
move mono
1
/%
EEL,.
r,<
, ,, 1m,
,.
.fl i�
r
fi