HomeMy WebLinkAboutBECOTTE, LORRAINE RECEIVED J .NoRT„1�
AANIEL 0Y?• � , ,°g Any appeal shall be filed
low "°^10"' e;' within (20) days after the
NORTH AND R " yqs !ass: ,' date of filing of this Notice
sgCHO
+..V in the Office of the Town
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER Clerk.
MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEALS
NOTICE OF DECISION
Date . . . . . . Septemb�r. .2$.,. , 19.84
Petition No . . . . . .45:7118.4
. . . . . . . .
Date of Hearing. . .September. .12, 1984
Petition of . . . Lorraine. B�cotte s . Richard .and. Christi ne. .Pineau •and•Terry Cook
Pretnises affected . . .133.-13.5 .Autrar). Ave... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Referring to the above petition for a variation from the requirements of the . . . Zoning. By. Law
Section 7, Par. 7. 3 and Table 2
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
so as to permit relief from the rear setback requirement. to, allow. the.
continued existence of a single family. .dwelling.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
After a public hearing given on the above date, the Board of Appeals voted to . . .Grant, . . the
. . . .variance � pecxx4oxix
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
based upon the following conditions:
1. That the shed be moved so that it is five feet from the rear
and side lot lines.
Signed
Alfred .E.. .F'ri.zel.le,. .Esq. ,. .Vi.ce. Chairman
Richard .J... .Trepanie.r,. Esq..., . Clerk
William .J.. .Su.11i.van . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Augustine. .W. . Nickerson .
Walter. F. . .Soule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Board of Appeals
nn RtyECEIVEA1ELnDD �IGTO N CLE AM appeW W
be OW
NORTH ANDOVER F a wMin 9 days of V t
date of filing of this Notice
;,saN in the Office of the lowni
Clerk*400- ' -.
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEALS
September 28, 1984
Mr. Daniel Long, Town Clerk Pineau, Becotte, and
Town Office Building Cook
120 Main Street 133-135 Autran Ave.
North Andover, Mass. Petition No. 45-' 84
Dear Mr. Long:
The Board of Appeals held a public hearing on Monday evening,
September 17, 1984 upon the application of Lorraine Becotte,
Richard and Christine Pineau, and Terry Cook. The hearing was
advertised in the North Andover Citizen on August 30 and September
6, 1984 and all abutters were notified by regular mail . The
following members were present and voting: Alfred E. Frizelle,
Esq. , Vice Chairman; Richard J. Trepanier, Esq. , Clerk; William J.
Sullivan; Augustine W. Nickerson; and Associate Member Walter F.
Soule.
The petitioners seek a variance from the provisions of Section 7,
Paragraph 7. 3 and Table 2 of the Zoning By Law so as to permit
relief from the rear yard setback requirement to allow the
continued existence of a two-family dwelling located at 133-135
Autran Avenue, located in the Residence-4 (R-4) zoning distict .
Counsel for the petitioners testified that the dwelling was
constructed in 1975. The Pineau' s and Becotte' s purchased it in
1976 when plot plans were not required to convey property. Two
decks were added to the original structure. No building permits
were issued for the decks . Mr. Cook is now purchasing the
premises and the plot plan drawn for the conveyance revealed the
violation of the rear setback requirement . The petitioners did
not create the violation and denial of the variance would create a
financial hardship to the petitioners .
Further testimony revealed that there is a shed on the property
which does not meet the setback requirements of the Zoning By Law
but which could be moved to meet the requirements.
No one spoke in opposition to the petition and one neighbor spoke
in favor .
y
Pineau, Becotte, and Cook it L
133-135 Autran Ave. TM
Petition No. 45- ' 84
to
September 28, 1984
Page 2 *Ao 11 ws%
Upon a motion made by Mr . Trepanier and seconded by Mr. Sullivan,
the Board voted unanimously to grant the variance as requested
with the condition that the shed be removed so that it is five
feet from the side and rear lot lines .
In granting the variance, the Board finds that Section 10.4 of the
Zoning By Law has been satisfied. In particular , the Board finds
that a literal enforcement of the provisions of the By Law would
create a hardship to the petitioner and that desirable relief may
be granted without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent and purpose of the By Law and without detriment to the
public good.
Sincerely,
BOARD OF APPEALS Q�
W e F'Y a)
Alfred E. Frizelle, Esq. ,
Vice Chairman
Jw