The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDOYLE, ALBERT i t Planning Board Form 81 P - 2 (1963) North Andover NOTICE TO TOWN CIMK OF ACTION OF PLANNING BOARD ON PLAN DESCRIBED BELOW Ike • Name and Address of Applicant. Date of Submission of Plan: z'lbert Ray Doyle Mareh' }. 1971 .lisbury, Vermont Town Clerk, Town of North Andover Town Office Building ' North Andover, l+tassachusetts Dear Sir: We forward to you herewith the original and new copy of the plan --described below, `heretofore submitted to this Board under G.L. c. 41, s.: 81'R. which you may deliver, upon request, to the applicant above named. 11 EXACT TITLE OF PLAN, with date and name,of Surveyor: "Flan of Send 1t2 worth .ndover, s,_s�. , �.urveyed for ..1bert h_y Doyle" , Stowers _,ssoci:tes , ries. ; .nd .>urveyors . September, 1969 T Description of land "sufficient,for identification": Lots A. B and C on the aforesaid entitled plan. Lot A containing 50,480 square feet more or less. Lot B oontitbing 68.690 square feet more or Tess. and Lot C eontalfting 22,060 square feet more or less, all' of said lots;being eontigupus and Fronting on Marbleridge Road, North Andover', ",YAssaohus*tts. �� 1213 141 eD JOHN J. LYONS a� TOWN M ERK NOftitt ANDOVER , Title reference: North Essex Deeds, Book 963 , page 461 ap 0 zo 0 g2w�z Attorney for Applicant EJsamesr $01Ea►ton, III. Es Eaton & Chandl . . , 3Essex Street, L&Mnm- The action taken by,this Board upon said plan is indicated upon the reverse hereof. (1) The North Andover Planning Board has determined that said plan does not require approval,under the subdivision control law, and the appropriate endorsement has been made upon the same. 2) The ` oath Ando r P anning Board d ermined t s 'd plan shows a i sub nisio ;" as def ed by G.D" c'. 41, s. 81 14' and m t the f e be n control Ali re- ub ted to it ora oval under he bdivisio r f ( The North An over $]_anni. Bold has dLtermin�lto tak no ac "on upon L' 'd plan., Very truly yours, i NORTH ANDOVER PLANNING BOARD 1 ,' By 1 Date: Form 81 P - 1 (1963) North Andover Planning Board SUBMISSION TO PLANNING-BOARD W PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL UNDER _TIM '! SUBDIVISION.CONTROL LAW Name and Address of Applicant: Date of. Submission of Plan: Albert Ray Doyle. March 1, 1971 R, D. #2 Salisbury, Vermont North Andover Planning d ver Pl n Board g Town Office Building North Andover, Massachusetts r Gentlemen: Pursuant to the provision's of G.L.;c. 41, s. 81 P, the original of the plan described below, together with two copies thereof;, is herewith submitted to you for a determination that your approval of the_'same is not� required by the subdivision control law. EXACTTITLE; OF PLAN, with date and ,namQ hof fSurveyor: "Plan of Land in Vorth Associates,T I Reg Land Surveyed bowers Ry y , p Description ofland "sufficient for identification": � Lots A. B and C on, the aforesaid' entitled plane, Lot "A containing 50,480 scqua:re.; feet more or less, Lot B conllang 68,690 `square , feet more or less, and Lot C containing 22,060 square feet mare or less all of saidlots being contiiuous and fronting on Nfaxbleridge Road, North Andover; Massachusetts. t N.. ti ru �0 pHD�V� CR , b Title reference: North Essex Deeds,, B6ok963 page 461,, Attorney for Applicant: James H. Eaton, II'I, Esqq__ t ;Eagan &' Chandler Es s 01 Esse2E Street, Lawrence Mass. 018�V0 It is believed that such a determination should be made for the reasons given upon the reverse hereof. , a APPLICANT'S REASONS FOR'BELIEVING THAT APPROVAL OF THE PLAN SUBMITTED HEREWITH IS NOT REQUIRED BY THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW: Lots A. B and C as shown on the attached plan comprise the total area remaining in Albert Flay Doyle, he having previously, conveyed the rest of his land in this area to others: Lots A and B have sufficient frontage and area to comply with the zoning bylaws. Lot C . the' rema ning land,"- under a previous agreement is to be conveyed to the lot shown on said plan as "n/f Carroll" , thus a substandard Lot C will not remain isolated and in single ownership, and the land owned by "n/f Carroll" will become a conforming lot with the conveyance of Lot C to it. There are no roads, utilities, or other public services• involved in this subdivision. Wherefore, your petitioner respectfully .prays that this plan be approved as "Planning Board approval not required",, Very truly yours', ALBERT RAY DOYLE By his attorneys EATON & CHANDLER BY: V—" Applicant +James H. Eaton, III + + s + + N.B. The subdivision control law requires the Planning Board to make the re- quested determination '+unless such plan shows a subdivision." G.L. c. 41, s. 81'P. Accordingly, the foregoing statement,of "reasons" must clearly indicate that the subjoet -plan does not "show a subdivision", which is defined by G.L. c. 41, s. 81 L. (;4# asanod by St. 1963, c. 58Q) I as follows: "Subdivision" shall mean the division of a tract of_land into two or more lots and shall include resubdivision, and, when appropriate to the context, shall relate to the process of subdivision or the land or territory'subdivided; pro- vided, however, that the division of a tract of land into-,two or more lots shall not be deemed to constitute a-subdivision within the-meaning of-the subdivision if cont of law ` at the time when it is ma a � � , � , every 1 of within, the tract sd_dbvi- ded has frontage on (a) a public way, or a way which the clerk of the city or town certifies is maintained and used as a public way, or (b) a way `shown on a plan theretofore approved in accordance with the subdivision control law, or (c) a way in existence when the subdivision control law become effective in the city or town in which the land lies, having, in the opinion of the planning board, sufficient width, suitable grades-and adequate construction.to provide for the needs of vehicular traffic in relation to the proposed use of the land r 'abutting thereon or served thereby, and for the installation of municipal,- ser- vices to serve such land and the buildings erected or to be erected thereon. Such frontage shall be of at least such distance as is then required by zoning or 'other ordinance or by-law, if any, of said city or town for erection of a building on such lot, and if no distance is so required, -such frontage shall be . of at least twenty feet. Conveyances or other instruments adding to, taking away from, or changing the size and shape of, lots in such a mamner' as not to leave ,any lot so affected without the frontage above set forth, or the division of a i tract of land on which two or more buildings were standing when the subdivision control law went into effect in the city or town in which the land lies into separate lots on each of which one of such buildings remains standing, shall not constitute a subdivision.