HomeMy WebLinkAboutFORGETTA, ANTONIO Form 81 P - 2 (1963) North Andover Planning Board
NOTICE TO TOWN CLERK OF ACTION OF PLANNING BOARD ON PIAN DESCRIBED BELOW
Name and Address of Applicant: Date of Submission of Plan:
1� filr�tM •1l�rR � awo 30 Ym ,
s
It
Town Clerk, Town of North"Andover :
Town Office Building-
North
uilding North Andover, Massachusetts S
Dear Sir:
We forward to you herewith the original and new copy of the plan
described below, heretofore submitted to this Board under G.L.-c. 41-, s. 81 P,
which you may deliver, upon request, to the applicant above named.
EXACT TITLE OF PLAN, with date and name of Surveyor:
p fNt at Y" at hdade.& peowds" ympuft arm ftftVft Nws'
Description of land"sufficient for identification":
�a
9
Title reference: North Essex Deeds, Book , page
Attorney for Applicant. 1tm�•,
O
14u2t.&-y v`/C.
The action taken by this Board upon said plan is indicated upon the
reverse hereof.
J
4
(1) The North Andover Planning Board has determined that said plan does not
require approval under the subdivision control law, and the appropriate
endorsement has been made upon the same.
(2) The North Andover Planning B etermined that said ows a
subdiv n, as defined by G.L. c. 481 81 L must there ore be
re-submitted to it for approval er the ubdivision rol law.
(3) The North Andover PI in as determine on
gaid plan. —
Very truly yours.,
NORTH ANDOVER PLANNING BOARD
Date: '
q
Form 81 P - 4 (1963) North Andover Planning Board
NOTICE TO TOWN CLERK OF SUBMISSION TO PLANNING BOARD OF PLAN DESCRIBED BELOW,
BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW
Name and Address rens of Applicant: Date of Submission of Plan
a AM It 3W
3M ago" fte"t
Town Clerk, town of North Andover
Town Office Building
North Andover, Massachusetts
Dear Sir:
Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 41, ss. 81 P and 81 T, you are
hereby notified that the plan described below has this day been submitted to the
North Andover Planning, Board for a determination that approval of the same is not ;
required by the subdivision control law.
EXACT TITLE OF PLAN, with date and name of Surveyor:
r1 se LSM at $A61me a ftee"Low MN410% you *Wr
DMOMMAM41M 9444010Aidentification":
ftM U4 at UN 60"b" 044 Ae h4suft A aid"
t
Title reference: North Essex Deeds, Book , page
Attorney for Applicant:
i
i
Very Y trul Y ours
Applicant
0RN
f 32
f • •
i Fi Ag111.�R ���
y�:(•�•Lass
�ACHu
12 13 74 $ TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
•,� RCCEIVE0 MASSACHUSETTS
o> L '�
NOV
12 1969
BOARD OF APPEALS
caN
r J
o OHN J. LYONS
w TOWN CLERK
S NORTH ANDOVER tiro November 12, 1969
oa Z
w
o�0 zo :o v2 Antonio Forgetta
1210 Osgood Street
John J. Lyons, Town Clerk
Town Office Building
North Andover, Mass.
Dear Sir:
As advertised in the Eagle Tribune on September 27 and October 4, 1969, the request
of Antonio Forgetta for a public hearing requesting a variation of Section 7.5 of
the North Andover Zoning By-Law was held in the Town Office Building by the North
Andover Board of Appeals on Tuesday, October 14.. 1969. The Board comprised
Arthur R. Drummond, Chairman; Daniel T. O'Leary, Secretary; J. Philip Arsenault, Esq.,
Donald J. Scott and Donald J. Leonard. Mr. Forgetta desires a division of land so
that each dwelling will have its own lot as per frontage and area requirements of
the Industrial "L" district, on the west side of Osgood Street and known, as 1210
Osgood Street, All abutters were duly notified of the public hearing by certified
mail.
Appearing in behalf of the petitioner were Daniel Forgetta and Eligio Forgetta, who
stated the variance was necessary because the existing buildings do not conform to
the sideline requirements of an Industrial "L° district. No opposition was apparent
and the Board took the matter under advisement.
At a special meeting of the Board of Appeals on Monday, November 3, 1969 it was
unanimously voted on motion of Donald Leonard, seconded by Daniel T. OILeary, to
GRANT the variance. Donald J. Scott was unavoidably detained from attending this
meeting but telephoned his approval. The reasons for granting are as follows$
1. The variance will not be in substantial derogation from the intent and purpose of
the Zoning By-Law.
2. Unless the variance is granted, the applicant will suffer substantial hardship,
financial or otherwise.
3. The general character of the neighborhood will not be adversely affected; as
neither will the public good to any substantial extent.
Very truly yours,
BOARD OF APPEALS
Ale
ARD-.ad Arthur R. Drummond, hairman
ys`EiCHUg�
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
MASSACHUSETTS
Jpy lv'o
0
rO N�LZR
[Y
BOARD OF `APPEALS '`a NpR AMoOV F�
R
NOTICE OF DECISION ozo o rz '
Date . . . . 72, .19bq. . . . , . . .
Petition No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date of Hearing October 14x. 2969
Petition of Antc►nio Forgetts .
Premises affected MO.Osgood . . . . . ... . . . .. . , . . . . . . . . .
Referring to the above petition for a variation from the requirements of the
. . . North.Andover: g..Bl► t
so as to permit tlss divis cm .9f.larA. .aq.t*.t. eah,dt�313, . . 13" .�to: w, .7.ot.
After a public hearing given on the above date, the Board of Appeals voted to . GRANT : the
Variame
for the construction of the above work, based upon the following i'onditions:
i
Signed fi d
t
Daviel .T. 01L,.& r,.Secrete. .
7?onand �, Scott . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d, Ph334p.Arsepautt,:$sq4re
Donald.J.,1#0x
Board of Appeals