Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutROSSETTI, ARMAND i COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ESSEX, SS. LAND COURT MISC. NO.f6+G7�0 ARMAND J. ROSSETTI, JR. , PATRICIA ) ROSSETTI, JORDAN CORREIA, ROSEMARY ) CORREIA, WALTER VANNI and LORI VANNI, ) Plaintiffs ) ) V. ) FRANK SERIO, JR. , RAYMOND VIVENZIO, ) ,_ ANNA O'CONNOR, ROBERT FORD, WILLIAM ) SULLIVAN, JOHN PALLONE and LOUIS } RIZZIN, as they are the BOARD OF ) APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER, ) Co and D. ROBERT NICETTA, as BUILDING ) -- INSPECTOR OF THE TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER, ) Defendants ) NOTICE OF APPEAL Notice is hereby given, pursuant to General Laws, Chap- ter 40A, section 17, of the filing of a Complaint to annul the decisions of the North Andover Board of Appeals and North Andover Building Inspector. The Complaint was filed in the Land Court in Boston, Massachusetts on August 9, 1991. A true and accurate copy of that Complaint is attached hereto. By it Attorney, Pe--ter M. alaguti BBO # 315450 Bingham & Malaguti Two South Main Street P.O. Box 1130 Middleton, MA 01919 (508) 777-9295 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ESSEX, SS. LAND COURT MISC. NO. ) ) ARMAND J. ROSSETTI, JR. , PATRICIA ) ROSSETTI, JORDAN CORREIA, ROSEMARY ) CORREIA, WALTER VANNI and LORI VANNI, ) Plaintiffs ) ) V. ) FRANK SERIO JR. , RAYMOND VIVENZIO, ) ANNA O'CONNOR, ROBERT FORD, WILLIAM ) SULLIVAN, JOHN PALLONE and LOUIS ) RIZZIN, as they are THE BOARD OF ) APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER, ) and D. ROBERT NICETTA, as BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER, - ) Defendants COMPLAINT TO ANNUL DECISIONS OF BOARD OF APPEALS AND BUILDING INSPECTOR UNDER GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER 40A, SECTION 17 1. The plaintiffs, Armand J. Rossetti, Jr. and Patricia Rossetti, are individuals residing at 11 Hansom Road, Andover, Essex County, Massachusetts. 2 . The plaintiffs, Jordan Correia and Rosemary Correia are individuals residing at 283 Campbell Road, North Andover, Essex County, Massachusetts. 3 . The plaintiffs, Walter Vanni and Lori Vanni are- individuals residing at 20 Ellington Street, Tewksbury, Middlesex County, Massachusetts. All the plaintiffs are hereinafter collectively referred to as "the owners. " 4 . The defendant, Frank Serio, Jr. , is the Chairman of the North Andover Board of Appeals and resides at 250 Hillside Road, North Andover, Essex County, Massachusetts. , 5. The defendant, Raymond Vivenzio, is a member of the North Andover Board of Appeals and resides at 11 Appledoor Lane, North Andover, Essex County, Massachusetts. 6 . The defendant, Anna O'Connor, is a member of the North Andover Board of Appeals and resides at 88 Martin Avenue, North Andover, Massachusetts. 7. The defendant, Robert Ford, is an associate member of the North Andover Board of Appeals and resides at 89 Bear Hill Road, North Andover, Essex County, Massachusetts. 8. The defendant, William Sullivan, is a member of the North Andover Board of Appeals and resides at 405 Salem Street, North Andover, Essex County, Massachusetts. 9. The defendant, John Pallone, is an associate member of the North Andover Board of Appeals and resides at 67 Vest Way, North Andover, Essex County, Massachusetts. -2- 10. The defendant, Louis Rizzin, is an associate member of the North Andover Board of Appeals and resides at 59 Blueberry Hill Lane, North Andover, Essex County, Massachusetts. All members of the North Andover Board of Appeals are hereinafter collectively referred to as "the Board. " 11. The defendant, D. Robert Nicetta (hereinafter "the Building Inspector") , is the Building Inspector of the Town of North Andover and resides at 63 Highland View Avenue, North Andover, Essex County, Massachusetts. 12 . The owners own the land and structure located at 485 Andover Street, North Andover, Essex County, Massachusetts (hereinafter "the locus") . The locus was constructed as a single family residence, appears to be a single family residence, and has been continuously used as a single family residence since before the Town of North Andover adopted its present Zoning By-Law. 13 . Under date of April 17, 1991, the Building Inspector wrote to the owners and demanded that they cease maintaining a "rooming house, dormitory, boarding house, etc. " in violation of the North Andover Zoning By-Law. A true and accurate copy of the letter of the Building Inspector is attached hereto as Exhibit "A. " Although that -3- letter was dated April 1799 p � 1, it was not received by the owners until May lo, 1991 because it was mailed to the wrong address. 14. The owners have never maintained a "rooming houses dormitory, boarding house, etc. " on the locus. For most of 1990, and through May, 1991, they rented the locus to four (4) college students who also did not use the locus as a "rooming house, dormitory, boarding house, etc. " Those college students neither subleased any portion of the locus nor took in boarders or roomers. 15. Beginning on June 1, 1991, the owners rented the locus to three (3) college students who also did not use it as a rooming house. Those college students have neither subleased any portion of the locus nor taken in boarders or roomers. 16. At all relevant times, the owners and their tenants have used the locus as a single family residence as defined by Section 2 . 37 of the North Andover Zoning By-Law. 17 . The letter decision of the Building Inspector dated April 17, 1991 exceeds his authority under the law. The plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Board under G. L. C. 40A, sec. 8. -4- 18. On July 23, 1991, the Board filed with the North Andover Town Clerk a written decision upholding the April 17 , 1991 letter decision of the Building Inspector. However, the Board said that the locus was being run as a "fraternity" rather than as a "rooming house, dormitory, boarding house, etc. " A true and accurate copy of the Board' s written decision dated July 23, 1991 is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B. " 19. Neither the owners nor their tenants have ever maintained a "fraternity" on the locus. Rather, their use has always been as a single family residence as defined by Section 2 . 37 of the North Andover Board of Appeals. 20. The owners' use of the locus has always been legal under the North Andover Zoning By-Law. 21. The decision of the Board dated July 23, 1991 exceeds its authority under the law. WHEREFORE, the plaintiffs pray that the court: 1. Annul the letter decision of the Building Inspector and the decision of the Board attached respectively as p Y Exhibits "A" and "B"; -5- 2 . Enter a declaratory judgment under G.L. c. 231A that the use of the owners and their tenants is legal and permissible under the North Andover zoningBy-Law w La and that at Y they may continue such use; and 3 . Grant such other relief as it deems just, and proper. By their Attorney, P3rtler M. Talaguti BBO # 315450 Bingham & Malaguti P.O. Box 1130 Two South Main Street Middleton, MA 01949 (508) 777-9295 -6- ATTEST: A'l'ma Copp r� EXHIBIT "A" Town CIO* April 17, 1991 Armand &Patricia Rossetti Jordan & Rosemary Correia Walter & Lori Vanni { 238 Campbell Road North Andover, MA ! Re: 485 Andover Street, North Andover To Whom It May Concern: A complaint was received by this Department from Children's Medical Office of North Andover/Ansel Realty Trust stating that you are operating a rooming house in a B-4 Zoning District at subject location. our investigation revealed that the house at 485 Andover Street is a private home being rented to Merrimack College students. The rental of the dwelling on that basis is in violation of Article 2, Sec. 2. 33 of the Zoning By-Law. It is a legally non-conforming use (Sec. 2 . 53, Zoning By-Law) as a one-family dwelling in a B-4 zone but, cannot be used as a rooming house, dormitory, boarding house, etc. For your information, the definition of "Family" according to Sec. 2 . 37 of the Zoning By-Law is as follows! "One or more persons occupying the same premises and living as a single housekeeping unit as distinguished from a group occupying a boarding house, lodging house, club, fraternity or hotel". ATTEST: A True Copy gr- T011M Oak You are hereby given 30 (thirty) days from receipt of this notice in which to vacate the premises. If you wish, you may appeal this action to the Board of Appeals. Yours truly, D. Robert Nicetta, Building Inspector DRN:gb c/J. Gordon, Town Mgr. N.A.F.D. N.A.P.D. Bd. of Appeals K. Nelson, Dir. R. Cain , Merr. College Security . certified Fee SENDER Complete+items t — hems z. 3 and 4 " Special Del very Fee , T Put your address In the 'RETURN card from Who returned to you. h9 r r o and i d to f 1Lri Far ad ono Restricted Delivery a fees en check ox es or additional sery °j ;t.s,❑ Show.to whom delivered,d -h':* +aR+myrwa 'ia pit f6rtra Return Receipt ° 3 Article.Addressed toto whom a e Dei Return Rossetti : Corr.ei N Date.an an k, et"al� ` Toral a es s 238')Camatpbell 'Rd .r Postmark Pos , rise %+ a, No. .Andover �• 6. S urs,-Addre e10 n 'rsfsdand je goy ' X i slurs A ��!1}i v 5 h rt'. rr, 7. Date of Delivery,,. r ,�lJh 1, .. .. PS Form 3811,Apr. 1989 *u.ss.RO.teessae•sre DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT Any appeal shall be filed EXHIBIT °B^ within (20) days after the +ci;u� date of filing of this Notice TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER in the Office of the Town �- Clerk. MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS NOTICE OF DECISION Date . .July, . .1991 . ... . . . . . . . . Petition Ne.. . 155-g0 . .. . . . . . . .. . Date of Hearing. .July .9, .1991.. . .. Petition of . . . . Armand.J,. Roti sgttl. , ,Ir . t. .41 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Premises affected . . . . .485. Andover. S.treet,. NAxkh.AvdAVQr, .MA. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Referring to the above petition for a variation from the requirements of the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . North.And,over.zoning .By-Lam. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . so as to permit . . .a .review'.of .a. decision.made .by'. the Building. .Inspectnr.. . ... . . . . . . . . After a public hearing given on the above date, the$oard of Appeals voted to . .UPHOLD. .: the . . decision. oL .the.Building. Insp,. #Xib . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �{li13�{l�aAf>3tYtT�t � ATTZ8T: A Tae Can Signed 4Jr.L. Fra Serio C� a rman Raymond Vivenzio Town Clerk . I . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . Anna O'Connor Robert P. Ford . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . Board of Appeals Any appeal shall be filed within 120) days after the µoRrh date of filing of this Notice o in the Office of the Town Clerk. $acHue6 TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS r BOARD OF APPEALS Armand J. Rossetti, Jr., et a1 - 11 Hansom Road * Petition #155-90 u� Andover, MA 01810 DECISION p' ' The Board of Appeals held a public hearing on Tuesday evenings June 11 and July 9, 1991 upon the application of Armand J. Rossetti, Jr., et al as a Party Aggrieved of the Zoning Bylaw so as to permit a review of a decision made by the Building Inspector regarding property at 485 Andover Street. The following members were present and voting: Frank Serio, Jr., Chairman, Raymond Vivenzio, Anna O'Connor and Robert Ford. The hearing was advertised in the North Andover Citizen on May 11 and 29, 1991 and all abutters were notified by regular,mail. Evidence was heard at the public hearing, from an abutter, that 6-7 people were living in the residence as evidenced,by the number of vehicles in the driveway of the premises. Also, tenants of the property told the abutter, Mrs. McNulty, that five (5) people were on the leases The lease submitted by the party aggrieved is a recent lease, dated after the notice of viola- tion. There was substantial evidence, including the log of the Merrimack College Security Police, that partying, drinking and loud get-togethers have been commonplace on the premises for a long period of time. There is evidence of numerous transients at the property. The petitioner's position that the property has only been used as a single family residence is untenable, as the described activities are more closely akin to and are tantamount to the operation of a fraternity house. While the owner/applicant may not be agreeable to permitting this use under the lease, it is evident that such use is what is actually occurring there, presumably under the aegis of the tenants. Sponsorship notwithstanding, the use is not that of a single family residence. See definition of Family (Sec.2.37) in the bylaw. As a result, upon motion of Raymond Vivenzio, seconded by Anna O'Connor, the board voted unanimously to uphold the decision of the Building Inspector. Dated this 23rd day of July, 1991 BOARD OF APPEALS 4j;.; J.- �Qlt`- a Fra Serio, Jr. Chairman i ! r Ady 'appeal shall be filed j within', (20) days after the i ��R-:,. date of filing of this Notice In the Office of the Town Clerk. CHU` � TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER MASSACHUSETTS L c r BOARD OF APPEALS Armand J. Rossetti, Jr., et al * `.- it Hansom Road * Petition #155-90 Andover, MA 01810 -= DECISION cr: The Board of Appeals held a public hearing on Tuesday evening, June 11 and July 9, 1991 upon the application of Armand J. Rossetti, Jr. , et al as, a Party Aggrieved of the Zoning Bylaw so as to permit a review of a decision made by the Building Inspector regarding property at 485 Andover Street. The following members were present and voting: Frank Serio, Jr., Chairman, Raymond Vivenzio, Anna O'Connor and Robert Ford. The hearing was advertised in the North Andover Citizen on May 11 and 29, 1991 and all abutters were notified by regular mail. Evidence was heard at the public hearing, from an abutter, that 6-7 people were living in the residence as evidenced by the number of vehicles in the driveway of the premises. Also, tenants of the property told the abutter, Mrs. McNulty, that five (5) people were on the lease. The lease submitted by the party aggrieved is a recent lease, dated after the notice of viola- tion. There was substantial evidence, including the log of the Merrimack College Security Police, that partying, drinking and loud get-togethers have been commonplace on the premises for a long period of time. There is evidence of numerous transients at the property. The petitioner's position that the property has only been used as a single family residence is untenable, as the described activities are more closely akin to and are tantamount to the operation of a fraternity house. While the owner/applicant may not be agreeable to permitting this use under the lease, it is evident that such use is what is actually occurring there, presumably under the aegis of the tenants. Sponsorship notwithstanding, the use is not that of a single family residence. See definition of Family (Sec.2.37) in the bylaw. As a result, upon motion of Raymond Vivenzio, seconded by Anna O'Connor, the board voted unanimously to uphold the decision of the Building Inspector. Dated this 23rd day of July, 1991 BOARD OF APPEALS 4erio, Jr. Chairman No top Any appeal shall be filed within (20) days after the CH date date of filing of this Notice TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER in the Office of the Town NIASSACHUSETPS Clerk. - $OARD OF APPEALS ry NOTICE OF DECISION a c� Date . .July, J?t 1991 Petition No.. . .M79Q . . . . . . . . . . . . Date of Hearing. .July ,9, ,1991. . . . Petition of . . . . Ax=nd Jr. RasiEietxf.,. :Dz t f .st. Al. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Premises affected . . . . .485. Andover. Sxreet,.Nora►.AndAverM .M. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Referring to the above petition for a variation from the requirements of the, . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N.arth.Andaver.Zoning .By-Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . so as to permit . . a review. of .a.decision.made ,by.the. .Building .Inspectan. . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After a public hearing given on the above date,the Board of Appeals voted to . .moLu the decision. of. .the.Building.. Ins.R. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Signed zip Fr Serio, Jr., a rman Raymond Vivenzio Anna O'Connor Robert P. Ford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Board of Appeals Received by Town Clerk: - , TOWN OF NORT11 ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS ' BOARD OF APPEALS li/ 11 - APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMEN'rs OF .THE ZONING ORDINANCE . App lican`� �/YIANA<I,lrc..._rL ! (. _hiCf17YSf: l �O 1. Application is hereby made: ' , T a) For a variance from the requirements of Section Paragraph. -- - and Table of the Zoning By Laws . � , b) For a Special Permit under Section__Paragraphof the Zoning By Laws sr' As a Party Aggrieved, for review of a decision made by the ����� Building Inspector or other authority. 2. a) �Premises affected are land and buiiding(s) numbered lYbOV �-s � 7�-------Street. -- -- . b) Premises affected are property with frontage on the Horth '( ) South (V East ( ) West ( ) side of Street, and known as No._ ` s _----------- -__ - C) Pxcmises affected are in Zoning District 7d and the premises affected have an area of / g' .quare Leet. and f roWt,r,lc. of __259 ' , feet . 3. Ownership �JQi' bOtGpWI ' S a) Name and address of owner ( if joint ownr.r!:hill, give till n;n1lo: ): DFcg` / ,2Jti9<}nr1y "e .o dl8lD t''.k Date of Purchase Previous Owne_ A �� ���- 13j- � +�to�1"1dfL4�.i"tnr .50,a.$ b) If applicant is not owner, check his/her interest in the premises: _Prospective Purchaser Lesee other (explain) 4,. Size o4 proposed building:/VQ+4+w-�lre ,44 - _ _feet deck; ` " Height -stories;-----f(. a) Approximate date of erection: b) Occupancy or use of each floor: c) Type of construction: _ S. Size of existing building: c3a•�+ feet front - I TT 3� • G f,.,a ,,,.,. ,. tG e �72.9X "eight ;Z _stories;_02s" fe 0t. ' '• i' a) Approximate date of erection. b) Occupancy or use of each floor:��4-4-44 y _ •` c) Type of construction: 1, G. Has there been a previous. appoal , und,•r zoninq,.-on the•'s pr rmirfr:s? - �C If so, when? L6 9 4'4 '00.4 �or59' +� !/ AWFOWR46YaW, /✓.t a i7 ' a E'/ �y►/m �d. 7.�w+fs�u�r Wal�er Y'annr, ao U)"elfAM 6.jW��s6ury, /W' os9�6 ,�,Q�llary L�rei9 l �,g"3 Csrm�bt�ld�P� Nor �.��, Mme. Or��' ® �o�daN Grr�ra 283 Car»jA6oll all /VX rJt83- t 7171*, J_•� : / 1 1 17;, Description of relief sought on this petition fIle OF 61_fgDCGu'giv . V"10 .m cro .,i Ad if r6. '.. Deed recorded in the Registry of Deeds in Book 'f�23L7 Page '+ 1 Land.Court Certificate No. Book Page The principal points upon which I base ,my application are as follows: ' (must be stated in detail) • . 5+ .7 ;'mes�r Jnr ors{•raN rs 6e� used --Ivr rd5,4nh4 o�rjc v k `tacss��s u . I agree to pay the filing fee, advertising in newspaper, and incidental expenses* Signature of Petit:o �erU) ;,—'— It Every application for action by the Board shall be made on a form approved ; by.• the Board. These forms shall be furnished by the Clerk upon request. Any communication purporting to be an application shall be treated as more notice of intention to seek relief until such time as it is .made on the 3: official application form. All information Balled for by the form shall be furnished by the applicant in the manner therein:,.prescribed. ' • r :r. Every-application shall be submitted with a list of "Parties In Interest" 1which list shall include the petitioner, abutters, owners of land directly iopposite on any public or private street or way, and abutters ,to -the . abutters ,within' three hundred feet (300' ) of the property line of the 1petitionet as they appear • on the most recent applicable tax list, notwithstanding that the land of any such owner is located in another city or town, the Planning Board of the city or town,, and the Planning Board of i _;every. abutting city or town. ) *Every appl•cation shall be submitted with an application charge cost in y the amount of $25.00. In addition, the petitioner shall be responsible '+ i -forany andlall costs involved in bringing the petition before the Board. I ;I'-F ,Such costs §hall include mailing and publication, but are riot necessarily, �) limited to these. t � Every application shall be submitted with a plan or. 1, approved by the %S .) Board. No petition will be brought before the Board unlc „_ ^aid plan has 'been submitted. copies of the Board's rogciirementsregarding plansare attached hereto or are available from the Board of Appeals upon request. t LIST OF MvrIES IN INTEREST Al ;e. ry °{1 , LIST OF PARTIES OF INTEREST NAME ADDRESS WMA MM _ 1 ■ 21 / r- i s ' i IM _t- _t- r, PLAN OF LAND TO ACCOMPANY PE'ri 1oN I Fa ch application and petitio,i to the Board shaltbe accompanied by five (5) copies of the f.ollowinq dercrihed plan: 'rite size of the plan sltatl h^ li it 17, drawn to scale, 1 inch equals 4U feet; it shall have a north point, names of streets, zoning districts, names and ad,lr.essns of owners ' of prop^rties within a,minimum of 200 fe,+t of. thr subjectproperty, property lines and location of buildin,ls on surroundinq properEirs. The location of. bulldiugn or u.r „f ?ho. prnpl•rty w,t„rr •t v.ir. t err•,• : is requested and distances from nljaceut buildings ani properLy lines shall be verified in the livid and shown on Urr plana The dimensions of the Lot and the percentage of the lot coverrld by the principal and accessory buildings and the required parking spaces shall be shown. Entrances, ed xits, riveways, etc. that are pertinent to the granting of the variance shall be shown. All proposed data shall be shown in red. i Any topographical feature of the parcel of Land retied upon for a variance, such as ledge, rock peat, or it, condition of water, brook, or river, shall be sho•.an on the engineering plan. when a variance is requested to subdivide a parcel of land, the Millen sions and area of the sur rourn'lilig lots may be _taken from the deed or lotting plan for comparison of the size of t11c Iots irl the a neighborhood, noted on the plan as such, inrl mFrkerl "approxix:�te" . i rhe plan shall be signet atvl 13ear th gea1. of a req ister eA surveyor or engineer. Any plans pc/`sr•nted with the petition s}tatl remain a part of the record'; of the 11,tar,1 of App—Its. If Living quarters are to ltn rcmo,l^lc'I, or arras ere t.o he converted into living quarter'•r, in adlition to tier plot plan, five (5) copies of the following descrihri plans shop he furnisher3: 1. A floor plan of each floor -In which remodeling is to be done or areas converted into living quarters; 2. A floor plan showing th^ staina.1y halls, Floor'; c)prninq into the halls, and exit doors of each floor or flor)rs where no re modeling or converting is to be ,L>nc; 3. Tim plans and elevations s11.1Ll show all rr,i?ting wort:. ALL proposer] work shall be sh,1wir in rel. 1'he izr or e.:teh plan shalt be it x 17 or l7 x 22.; it shellhe drawn to sr-ilr, L/>l inch equals one foot. All plans and elevations prnscnrnd vrith the petition shell remain a part of the records of the 13,-lard or Apupats . For petitions regnestinrl v:lr. iation(s) frrwi the ` nrovir.inns of Section 7, Paragrpahs 7. 1, 7.2, 7.3, rind 7.11 ,11d 'Iar)lr 2 of the Zoning ny Law for convey,ince nnrporrs rimy, plot pirn,, c'-rt ifi^,1 by a registered enginccr Or I and slrrv,•y•,r. of I h^ InrcoI tf Inud l with a structure thereon heir} conv^_yc'l, will 11' .1ccepkahlr to the Board of Appeals provided: 1. The dweILing(s), structurr(s), or huildinq(sl wrcr c )vstrilcted prior to March 14, 1977. 2. The petition is not to olio'.-r constru^.tioil "c %tltr`rnticni to the dwelling(s) , structure(^) , car buil,lin'�I.) whirh. .will re- sult in the need for the iseuanre of a hitil,li'n1 prrmil. 3. The size of the plan shalt lip no smal.lrr Flinn g 1/2 x 11 inches and must show th^ �xi s t 1 n 1 arr...a of tIi, pare^1 , tltc existing frontage, .111'1 til- ^xistrn'j. sell.1.r ks (if l.hr dwelling(s), structure( , ), or huiI,Iinq(I ) taring cttnv'•yr•,1. . " . r 4. Proper space is PC nn r.he_ I,lnt pl:m for Lha, 11r,ard's r.g signatures, as w,,ll as a•I prate s ,a for the follniding information: elate ref fitin•1, doof te puhlir h^ariu'F, "I till date of. approval .