HomeMy WebLinkAboutMCCONAGHY, DANIEL DAVtC? �, � I7c.�R.tS �•• . Ct..EtetEtitTs�-tE L.AI�(BEQ.T RtD�"sSLY �. �'' E' ;�
Er-BAcze�.[za.M. SMiTti tCAKI,.I.tt✓ R . �' �� � a ._
44 A.PPL.ETOts ST . A?Pi.EToty ST . t53 DA.1..E S't . ff
,Q f z� APPLETbi1 _ SIRE
r��q8 .- ._ LOCUS
A 'P P L.E`-O �.1 S �' R E �T a�,� � �� � to
w e
�SSE)C C011i� -r-e LA,rOuY~ S�CaI 50 �t�llflE d <. - -
- -
__ ._ 100.OK:). •,.�3 34 Q1�•
. i . . - ES
` ARzA~28,400 f V
ARE�►.w 33,400.�� , �' � m
7 S 'Q; �,� � Q• UJ D NOR'CN f.IRDVER $OeARDt APPEALS
�ECIS10(.l �o
,�� '� Gq4 rte• -.i � � � � �-� �
0
r
RE
e
u ,
I y
¢ P
l�o�e o Loot Ls E -- !� � i+
W cfl dEED GJiC.t MS- P.42 0 5�° h' o� t1t }- A.
Z Z r.H.O.R. PL.r6.M go. 320 fo �Y r�' �, N d
a 7 N 5xt S'T'a Lore Legg. - - w ; • a
N -'
`t'o 5E 'DtSCOUTNUED _;" 0 � Q 1 w w IV
W f-w 0 (MAP 3�8- Lor S4-) � CO �1,ttAP 3-t� Lo-r 33� W U 4:r CI. DATE
3
o
• �- a q ° PLAN O;:, LAND
-
CL
�-
• S Sg W
JE Qu E. ur3 J
�
MOUTm Atquovep,
M
s
s
"�Z PPLrz- 0 .3 sT. dQZ pSZEP*4REa FOR
tU. ORm Ah70vEQ � DANIEL qADELE.
1that tors plan was pre- aPlannir� Brd Approval undofc- pared in conformance with the clu j 0McCONAG14Y
• A
vision Prof Law nmf r� — Rules and Regulations of the Ariz Zo 1983 �+� a "�
d. flearsters of Deeds. ., -� p d 59 APPLE�'01•t S�'R.ES`C
Xom1wG DISTRICT Pt
BE27!-r.Goopmf, ,R.Ls. 82C UTR1�.LS-C.,
$ � o sc�►a so a� Fee 1O;' /19R.?A,1983
12>30{'eOP1E0RMANCE WITH ZONING P. GULAT;C°:S.
NORTH ANDOVER PLANNING BC:'.-'D
n r
�,. - � � �.
'" � � ' w .�
� �- �j
��
,r
R' ?
1
� --�,:
J � J
C
v
}
Received by Town Clerk :
'R ,, FOR CA
Fr .
GAF 1i APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN
NGRi", ', t _' aR BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL
'i JAN 27 10 20 AM '84
' 19 ZX -
To the Planning Board of the Town• of' North Andover:
The undersigned wishes to -record the accompanying plan and requests a
determination by said Board that approval by it under the Subdivision
Control Law is not required. . The undersigned believes that such approval
is not required for the following reasons :
1 . The division of land shown -on the accompanying plan is nota sub-
division because every lotshownthereon has the amount of .frontage
required by, th N rth dov r Zoning By Law and is on a public way ,
namely, e . or a private way , namely,
, being land bounded as follows : .
is
ff
- -
Ivorn
14
2_ The division of_ land .s.hown .m-the__accompanying. Tlan_ is- -not= a sub-
division for the fol7ow�ng==reasonsT~
r of
i GT :l" c ; �
3. Title reference . North Essex--Deeds; Bo-ok-;-ZJZ2 --5 Page y� �n or
Certificate of Title No. Registration Book
Page
Applicant ' s Sinature : Owne `s signature and- address -if not
'Q r. th ap J i cant,:
Lim
Applicant ' s Addred.
Received by Town Clerk ;
Notice to APPLICANT/TOWN CLERK of action of Planning Board on
accompanying plan :
1. anning Board has determined that . said pla
The North Andover Pl
does not require approval under the Subdivision Control Law ,
and the appropriate endorsement has been made upon the same.
2. The North Andover Planning Board has determined that said pla
shows a subdivision , as defined by G . L . c. 412 s . 81-L, and
must therefore be re-submitted to it for approval under the.
Subdivision Control Law.
Very_ truly yours ,
NORTH ANDO-Y-E-R P 11�Pii
s
By
Date :
FORII A
APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN "
R BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL
JAN 27 Id o dR 'BSI
19 Z/
To the Planning Board of the Town of North . Andover.,
The undersigned wishes to .record the accompanying plan and requests a
determination by said Board that approval by it under the Subdivision
Control Law is not required. . The undersigned believes that such approval
is not required for the following reasons :
- i
1. The division of land shown on 'the accompanying- plan is not - a sub-
division because every lot shown thereon has the amount of .frontage
required by th N rth dov(erfZoning By Law and -is on a public - way , 1
namely , ^, �n fre�Y or a private way, namely,
being land bounded as follows :.
d _ -
� f0
cr GN
E44
2 . -The division- of-_land shown . on. he -accompanying plan _is nota sub
division for the -following ;reasons:-
i IGT ivyiq ScArie�v��
+�i erence . north - Essex-Deeds Book 112 75_' Page = �a—s or
�r
t i e 'reff
`• '�� 1
Certificate of Title No. Registration Book
Page
Applicant ' s Signature: own
' s signature and address if not
th ap _A i cant,:
Applicant ' s Addres J�
_ h�Pf�h 5z�
Received by ow t; ier� :
Notice to APPLICANT/TOWN CLERK of action of Planning Board on
accompanying plan :
1. , The North Andover Planning Board has determined that said p
approval under the Subdivision Control Lav
does not require app
and the appropriate endorsement has been made upon the samf
2 . The Norte ndover Planning Board has determined that said 1
an
shows sub ivision , as d d by G .L . C. 4i., s •
mus theref a be re- mi ted
it for ap der th
S division Con Law.
_ Very truly yours ,
NORTH ANDOVER' ANNJ
By
Date :
REQ^t1 NORTH, Ncp 'Lr Ge
DANIEL � ., :�..' S" a�� 0�
NOR T
�f 2p"
SEP 52ti ':,..:::
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
MASSACHUSETTS G\eta
BOARD OF APPEALS
September 4 , 1986
Petition #5-87
Adele & Daniel McConaghy
59 Appleton Street
Mr . Daniel Long , Town Clerk
Town Office Building
North Andover, MA 01845
Dear Mr. Long :
The Board of Appeals held a public hearing on August 12 , 1986 upon
the application of Adele & Daniel McConaghy as the Party Aggrieved
for review of a decision made by the Board of Appeals so as to.
permit deletion of the condition that the existing dwelling on Lot l
tie into the sewer line down Appleton St . from Dale St . per Notice
of Decision dated December, 1983 . The following members were present
and voting : Frank Serio , Jr. , Chairman , Alfred ' Frizelle , Vice=chairman ,
William Sullivan, Raymond Vivenzio and Anna O ' Connor .
The hearing was advertised in the North Andover Citizen on, July 24
and July 31 , 1986 and all abutters were notified by regular mail
Motion made to grant this petition by Mr. Raymond Vivenzio and second-
ed'` by Anna O' Connor - Vote in favor , 2 and vote- against , 3 The
petition was DENIED .• The majority of the Board -felt that this petition
should have been applied for at an earlier date not 30 months after
the original decision had- been made . The orig:i-nal Notice of Dectsion ,
dated December 22 , 1983 was granted with the condition both Lot 1
and Lot 2 tie into the sewer line down Appleton St , from Dale St . and
this has not been done . ; The Board feels that there has been an un-
reasonable delay on the applicant 's part .`
Sincerely ,
BOARD Of APPEALS
Frank SQ o , J £ airman
/awt
W Rt;CEfVED
LcvG
R Tf L p��� days i���� •11�
HO e..,Lr+ ap ti
uta 10VER '�e.•Baas Pny �1 0{ a ati
SEP P 5iceas�� .N��r��o{ o�
e
52
P 8s TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER a r tre
MASSACHUSETTS G\pw
BOARD OF APPEALS
NOTICE OF DECISION
Adele & Daniel McConaghy
. .59 Appleton St . Date . . . . . S.ept.ember`. 5 ,. -IMA
N. Andover, MA O1845
petition Na. . . . . .5:-.87. . . . . . . . . . .
Date of Hearing. . .
petition of . . . . . A.delee . &. :Da.ni,s.1. .M`aConag:hy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
premises affected . . . . . 5.9 .A p p le.t on . $.t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .
Referring to the above petition for a l4XdaUiLMMM Nyh]iiiiibW U94 : :.. ..,
Party. .Aggr.i.ev.nd.,. :Jot . nevi:ew. .af. a. d.eci.si on . m.ade. .by. .th.e . Bnar.d . o.f. Appeals
soastopermit .deletion. .of. .the. .co.nd .tio.n . that. .th.e .e.xis.tin.g. dwel.l.in.g . o.n Lot 1
t.i.e. -i.nto. . t.he .sewer: .l.in.e . d.own. .Ap.ple.ton. .St.. . .f.r.om .Da.le. .St:.. .pe.r. N.otj.ce of
Decision dated December, 1983.
After a public hearing given on the above date, the Board of Appeals voted to . B E N.Y. . . : the
. P.a r ty . A g g r.i.a v.e d. . . . . . . . Ud#*irs #Xa1WV"IM 9411difil 41#MW w low A
powixtox -fro-tion m.ade. .to. grrant. .by. .Ra.ymond. .Vim-en.zio. .and .se.con:ded .by. .Anna
O' connor Vote In favor 2Against = 3 Petition DENIED
tog Aix 144FJ ")q� Ak owl 1%biw6 w*e1(IR*9FJf gP1P9tM
Signed Fra ri Jr Chairman
Alfred rize.11e�', Yice-chairman
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
William Sullivan
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :
Raymond Vivtnzio
Anna O 'Connor
. . . . . . . . . . ..
Board of Appeals
u
,t �NQaTh��
0:�A� "Cp'.rl An a
�,`-_�,, � •F; A ,L„4 Y appeal shall be filed
DAkwithin (20) days after the
a ( 9ss
►, geeing date of filing of this Notice
'O in the Office of the Town
BEC 2Z �� >� 1$a MASSACHUSETTS Clerk.
BOARD OF APPEALS
NOTICE OF DECISION
Date . . . . . . . .D e.ee 10 e r. .?2., . 1.9.8 3
Petition No.. .7 77. ' 8.3 . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date of Hearing D e c e m b e r . 12 , 19 8 3
Petition of . . . . . . . . . . . . l)AN.I.EL. .AND .ADEL.E. .M,CCp.NAG.HY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premises affected . . . . . . 5.9. A p p 1.e t o n. S t r e.e t. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Referring to the above petition for a variation from the requirements of the . 7.0.n i.n g. .8 y. .L a w
Se.ction .7 , . .P.ar.agr.aph. .7 ..1 . and. .Tab.1.e. .2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
so as to permit . r. e.l.i e.f . f.r.om. .th.e .mi.nimum. .ar.ea. .r.eq.ui r.eme.ats. .to. .al.l.ow. .th.e
di.vis.i.on. .of. .one l.ot. into. . two . Aot.s , . .each . h.avi.ng. .l.ess. :t.han. .the . requ.i.red
area .
After a public hearing given on the above date, the Board of Appeals voted to . . Grant the
v a r i a n c e bayx c �.�c�iclaii xl x e � x
14 i4�ltXtan�c. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
f&)&o(ro=*=atinxof Aker ahov*wxwX based upon the following conditions:
1 . That the existing dwelling on Lot 1 and the proposed dwelling on
Lot 2 tie into the sewer line down Appleton Street from Dale Street.
Signed
Frank. Se.rio., . J.r. . .,. .Ch.air:man. . . . . . . . .
Ri.cha.r.d. .J . . Tre.pan.i.er., . E.s.q..,. . Cl.erk
Wi 1.l i.am. A . . .Sul.1.i v.an. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Au.gus.ti ns . W... . N.i.ck.ers.an. . . . . . . . . .
Walter F. . S.oul.e ,. .Ass.oci.ate. :'•lember
Board of Appeals
ORTM
un,` r: :�•'^` ''°� Any appeal shall be filed
R
4P within (20) days after the
+ . . 4 • date of filing of this Notice
DEc 22 12 10 M w a�CH in the Office of the Town
Clerk.
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEALS
December 22, 1983
Mr. Daniel Long, Town Clerk
Town Office Building
North Andover, Mass . 01845
Re: Daniel and Adele McConaghy
59 Appleton Street
Petition No. 77- ' 83
Dear Mr. Long:
The Board of Appeals held a public hearing on Monday evening,
December 12, 1983 upon the application of Daniel and Adele
McConaghy. The hearing was advertised in the North Andover
Citizen on November 23 and December 1, 1983 and all abutters
were notified by regular mail . The following members were
present and voting: Frank Serio, Jr. , Chairman; Richard J.
Trepanier, Esq. , Clerk; William J. Sullivan; Augustine W.
Nickerson; and Walter F. Soule, Associate Member.
The petitioners seek a variance from the provisions of
Section 7, Paragraph 7. 1 and Table 2 of the Zoning By Law
so as to permit relief from the minimum area requirements
to allow the division of one lot into two lots, each having
less than the required area, on premises located at 59 Apple-
ton Street.
The petitioners testified through counsel that this request
represents a re-petition before the Board of Appeals . At a
public hearing held on May 9, 1983, the petitioners made a
similar request to subdivide their property, which was denied
by the Board of Appeals on June 6, 1983. Subsequently, at a
public hearing held on October 3, 1983, the McConaghy' s re-
quested and received the consent of the North Andover
Planning Board to re-petition the Board of Appeals, pur-
suant to M.G.L. Chapter 40-A, Section 16 and the North
Andover Zoning By Law, Section 10, Paragraph 10.8.
Daniel and Adele McConaghy
59 Appleton Street NO ' SER 9
Paget �on No . 77- ' 83 DEC Z2 i2 10 PM X83
Testimony on December 12 , 1983 revealed that since the applicants
were not represented by counsel on May 9 . 1983 , their presentation
may not have been adequate . Also , the McConaghy' s purchased two
lots in 1969 with the intent of selling and/or building on Lot 2 .
The rezoning of the property in 1972 by the town rendered lot 2
unbuildable , but the applicants have continued to be taxed for
two lots . Said rezoning has caused a financial hardship to the
petitioners .
In addition , a sewer line has been constructed in front of the
property . This sewer was not available in May and this signi -
ficantly changes the circumstances regarding the applicants ' s
property . With the sewer available the need for Large lots to
accommodate septic systems no longer exists .
Several neighbors spoke in favor of the petition and no objections
were heard .
Upon a motion made by Mr . Trepanier and seconded by Mr . Nickerson ,
the Board voted unanimously, to reconsider the matter on the grounds
that there has been a material change ( ie . , the installation of
sewer) .
A motion was made by Mr. Sullivan and seconded by Mr . Trepanier
to grant the variance with the condition that the existing dwelling
on ', Lot 1 and the proposed dwelling on Lot 2 tie into the sewer line
down Appleton. Street from Dale Street. The motion passed unanimously .
In granting the variance , the Board finds that both Section 10 .4 and
10`. 8 of the Zoning By Law have been satisfied . In particular , the
Board finds that owing to circumstances relating to the land, a
literal enforcement of the provisions of the By Law would involve
a hardship to the petitioners , since the property was purchased as
two lots and has continued to be taxed as two lots by the town and
that desirable relief may be granted without nullifying or sub-
stantially derogating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning By
Law . The Board also finds that the addition of the sewer line
constitutes a material change in the conditions upon which the
previous unfavorable action was based.
Sincerely ,
BOARD OF APPEALS
Frank Serio , Jr. ,
Chairman
jw
( Plan to follow)
Received by Town Clerk : -
FORM A
APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN
BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL
June 3, 19 83
To the Planning Board of the Town of North Andover:
The undersigned wishes to record the accompanying plan and requests a
determination by said Board that approval by it under the Subdivision
Control Law is not required . The undersigned believes that such "approval
is not required for the following reasons :
1. The division of land shown on the accompanying plan is. not a sub-
division because every lot shown thereon has the amount of .frontage
required k�plefonoSrth Andover Zoning By Law and is on a public, way ,
namely , or a private way , namely ,
being land bounded as follows :
Beginning at an iron pipe in the Southerly line of Appleton Street Westerly
of the intersection of Appleton Street and Dale Street; thence along said,
Souther y ine of Appleton Street, N- 56-7 - "E. , a distance of . 295 . 19 Feet
to an Essex County Stone Boundl thence 513ong a rad.'�1S of 90 n0 feet
tance of 43.49 feet to an Essex County Stone Bound ; thence still along
Appleton Street in a r :
thence turning and. ruonina_S . 590V W, - -16.4.7$ feet. _ benee S. 59 9 W. ,
AI S . 5 G 9 LV
149.62 feet to an iron pipe ; thence turn; na aAd�sunn ng
187 .14 feet to the point begun at . Total area 6 . , 800 square fet .
2 . The division of land shown on the accompanying plan i5 not a sub-
division for the following reasons :
Board of Appeals for dividing one lot into
Received aroyal from the
two buildable lots in an R-2 zoning district on a Public way
3. Title reference North Essex Deeds , Book 1123 Page 426 or
Certificate of Title No . Registration Book
Page
Appli-cant ' s Signature - Owner ' s signature and address if not
.� the applicant :
Applicant ' s Address :
59 Appleton Street
North Andover, MA 4)1845
83!,0:; d�,.01N
�4-Z"'3 o to
Q x;133314
The principal points upon which I base my application are as follows :_
(Must be stated 'in detail ).
The lots wi31 be larger than .others in the. area. ,. Denial of ';t,he
variance will result in substantial hardship financial and otherwise.
Granting the variance .will not be' detrimental to the neighborhood - -°
or nullify the intent or ourpnap of 'tha by law
I agree -;to pay for advertising in newspaper and incidental expenses*,
Petitioner 's Signature
Sec. l APPLICATION FORM - —
Every application for action .by the Board- shall be made on a form
approved by the Board. These--forms shall be furnished by the clerk
upon request . Any communication purporting to be an application
shall be, treated as mere notice of intention to seek relief .until
such time as it is made on the official application form. All in-
formation called for by the form shall be furnished by the applicant
in the manner' therein prescribed.
Every application shall be submitted with a list of "Parties in
Interest ' which list shall include the petitioner, abutters , owners,,.-
of
wners=of land directly opposite on any public or private street or way ,
and abutters to the abutters within three hundred feet of the property
line of the petitioner as they appear on the most recent applicable I '
tax list, notwithstanding that the land of any such owner is located i
in another city or town , the Planning Board of the city or town, and i
the Planning Board of every abutting city or town. f:
* Every application shall be submitted with an. application charge cost
in the amount of $25 .00. I-n addition , the petitioner shall .- be respon-
sible for any and all _ costs .involved ' in `bringing the petition - before
the Board. Such costs shall include mailing and publication , but
are not necessarily limited to these .
i
- LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST
Name Address
Paul & Virginia E Dyer 41 Appleton t+
.Clementine Lambert & Barbara Mary- Smith- 58 Appleton Street
Jean E . Stannard 97 Appleton
Salvatore Doris Licciardello 113 Appleton Street
Alfred E. '& Noreen M Feizelle 131 Appleton -Street . .
William J. & Mary McDonald 106 Appleton Street
Robert B. & Eleano,rM. lOD Apple on ;street
_ _S
_.
Ridgely B., & Fannie - R -Underwood . , _ 153a
; le'. Street•,,.
R. Ashton & Gwendolen ' Smith 158 Dale -Street
Andrew J . & Mary R . Moynihan 141 Dale Street`
( Use ,additiorial sheets .if necessary)
ceiyed by:_Town Clerk :
r TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS F ;
BOARD- OF APPEALS
M6 ..
Ko,a-Not ` �Tahi s application must be typewri tten
APPLICAJfQJtFA q� KEP, FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
4
pllcant Daniel -& Adele McConaghy ~ Address 5.9 Appleton Street j
Application ishereby`made `
(a) For 'a variance -from the requirements of 'Section `7 Paragraph � •
and -Table 2 of the Zoning By-Laws .
(b-) For a .Special Permit under Section Paragraph of "the
Zoning By-Laws .
( c) As a ' party `aggrieved , for review of. a decision made .by the 3uilding
Inspector or other authority.
( a) Premises affected are 1. land z and building(s-) x numbered
59 Appleton Street Street .
(b) Premises affected are property with frontage on the North ( )
South ( ) . East ( ) West -( j side of
-Street , and known.. as No. Street.
(c) Premises affected are in Wino District R-2 ,. and -the pr-emi ses
affected have an area of ' square feet and frontage o_f
295 square feet.
Ownership,
(a)' Name and -address of' owner (if joint ownership , give- all names]
Daniel, & Adele McConacahv -
William •Broughton
Date . of purchase :.Previou•s Owner.
(b) If applicant is not owner, check his interest An the premises : -
--Prospective Purchaser Lesee Uther (explain)
Size of proposed building : front ; feet deep ;
Height : . stories ; feet.
( PP
a Approximate date of erection :
(b; Occupancy or use of each floor :
(c ) Type of construction:
Size of: xisting- building : 70 feet front ; 24 feet deep ;
Height : stories ; . 1Z— feet. _
(a) Approximate date of erection 1956 _
(b) Occupancy or use of each floor: Residentia1
(c) Type of construction : Wood
',. Has there been' a previous appeal , under zoning , on these premises ? No
If so , when?
Description of relief sought. on this petition Wish to divide; our land into
two lots haVi'ng les
Deed recorded 'in . the Registry "of Deeds -in Book 1123 :__- PaOer 426 or
Land::Comr•t Certificate No. - Book Page
ved by Town Clerk :
w
� 1 9
ate; TO gR71i ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS r .;*•
N � t .�<�� fOARD OF APPEALS ;+a^•...�.,�
ime : CHO
t.�E
NoWNThis application must be typewritten
fou�� II Qgg +p�
APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FR 'fi'fiE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
pplicant Daniel and Adele McCona¢hv Address59 Appleton St . , North Andover
Application is hereby made
(a) For a variance from the requirements of Section 7 Paragraph 7. 1
and Table 2 of the Zoning By-taws .
(b) For a-Special Permit under Section Paragraph of the
Zoning By-Laws .
(c) As a party aggrieved , for review of a decision made by the Building
Inspector or other authority .
(a) Premises affected are land X and building(s ) X numbered
59 'Ao121eton Street Street .
(b) Premises affected are property with frontage on the North ( )
South, ( X) East ( ) West (X ) side of-Appleton Street
S'treety and known as No . 59 Appleton StreetStreet.
(c) Premises affected are in Zoning District R�-2 and the premises
affected... have an area of 619800 square feet and frontage of
295 square feet .
• Ownership
1aY ' Name and address of- owner (if joint ownership , give all names )
Daniel and Adele McConaghy
Date ofpurchase January 19 1969Previous• Owrier.' Wiliam Broughton
(b) If applicant is not owner , check his interest inr the premises ;
Prospective Purchaser Lesee Other ( explain)
• Size. af proposedbuilding ; front ; feet deep ;
Height : stories ; - feet.
ja� Approximate date of erection :
b Occupancy or use of each floor :
-(c) Type of construction ;
s,
Size of existing building : 70 feet front ; 24 feet deep ;
Height : x stories; 18 feet .
(a) Approximate date of erection : 1956
(b Occupancy r : res- ancy or use of each flooidential
(c) Type of construction . wood frame
Has there been a previous appeal , under zoning , on these premises? Yes
Lf so ,_ when? April 9 1983
{. Desc.ription of relief sought o;n. this petition The petitioners seek permission
to alter the existing lot line dividing- the two narealc so as .to create a -
buildable lot having less than the required area in an u_9 district
Deed recorded in - the Registry of Deeds in Book 1123 Page 426 or
Land ,Court Certificate N.9:. Book Page
1- ,
The principal points upon which I base my application are as follows :
(Must be stated in detail )
(See attached sheet )
I agree pay for dvertising in newspaper and incidental expenses
petitioner ' s Si nature
Marden, Attorney for petitioners
eginal Ls p,C. , 23 Central Street ,
Law Offices of- Re inald L. Marden, Andover , Ma. 01810
Sec. 1 APPLICATIO14 FO M 470-0477
Every application for action by the shall beall furnishedebyntheform
clerk
approved by the Board. These form application
upon request . Any communication purporting to be tion to seek
.
shall be treated as mere notice of1C1dlnapplication kform1efAll tin-
such, time as it is made on to mf shall be furnished by the applicant
formation called for by
in the manner therein prescribed.
Every PP etitioner, abutters , owners.
application shall be submitted with a list of "Parties in
Interest' which list shall includethe
Private street or wayo property
of land directly opposite on any p
ear on the most recent applicable
and abutters to the abutters within three hundred feet of the p P
line of the petitioner as they app such owner is located
tax list , notwithstanding that the land of any or town, and
in another city or town, the Planning Board
orof pWne city
the Planning Board of every abutting city cost
application charge
* Every app the petitioner shall be respon
lication shall be submitted with an aPp the petition before
in the amount of $25 . 00 . In addition ,
sible for any and all costs involved in bringing ublication$ but
the Board. Such costs shall include mailing and p
are not necessarily limited to these .
LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST
Adder ss
N_me 41 Appleton Street '
Paul & Virginia E. Dyer S8 Appleton Street
Clementine Lambert &Barbara Mary Smith
97 Appleton Street
Jean E. Stannard 113 Appleton Street
Salvatore & Doris Licciardello 131 Appleton Street
Alfred E. & Noreen M. Frizelle 106 Appleton Street
William J . & Mary McDonald 100 Appleton Street
Robert B & Eleanor M. Hay 153 Dale Street
Ridgely B. & Fannie R. Underwood 158 Dale Street
R. Ashton & Gwendolen Smith 141 Dale Street
Andrew J . & Mary R. Moynihan
( Use additional sheets if necessary)
f �
r 1
ATTACHMENT
The principal points upon which I base my application are
as follows:
The Petitioners own two adjoining parcels of land located at
59 Appleton Street, being described on The Town of Andover As
sesors Map at Map 0378 , Blocks 0033 and 0034, respectively. The
Petitioners ' home is located on the parcel designated as Block
0034, and Block 0033 is vacant , with the exception of an encroach-
ment of approximately 5-10 feet of a driveway and septic system.
i
The Petitioners are seeking a variance from this Board to allow
them to slightly alter the present lot line where the parcels abut,
in order to turn what is now a vacant , unuseable lot , into a
buildable lot. A variance is required, as a separation of the two
i
lots would leave both lots having less than the required square
footage in an R-2 District .
The Petitioners believe that a literal enforcement of the
By-Law as to the parcels in question would unquestionably result
ii
in substantial financial hardship to them. As was stated above,
the parcels are treated separately by the assessors office, re- G
sulting in tax bills on each parcel . Due to the recent revalua-
tion of property due to Proposition 2�, the tax bill for the
vacant parcel has gone up dramatically. Although the parcel is
presently vacant and unbuildable, the assessed value of the
LAW OFFICES OF parcel exceeds $25 ,000.00. The Petitioners are faced with a
EGINALD L MARDEN. P.C.
23 CENTRAL STREET I'
ANDOVER, MASS. OISIO
TELA al»aso.osn
serious financial hardship because of the taxes due and payable
on the unbuildable lot. A variance would allow the Petitioners '
to sell the parcel, thereby alleviating the financial hardship
on them. Without a.variance, the Petitioners will in all likli
hood have to sell their home as they simply cannot meet the ad-
ditional financial burden.
The Petitioners believe that the variance could be granted
without substantial detrimen to the public and without nullify-
ing or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the
By-Law. First , the proposed lots would contain 28,400 square feet
and 33 ,400 square feet respectively. Both lots would contain
adequate frontage and setbac s to satisfy the By-Law. It is im-
portant to note that the parcel in question is abutted on the
east and south-east by land oned R-3 , which has a lot area re-
quirement of 25,000 square f et . Second, the lot areas of many
of the properties in the Petitioners ' neighborhood contain less
than 25,000 square feet . Finally, the Petitioners ' property
abuts an electric company easement to the east and south. Be-
cause of these factors , the Petitioners believe that the Variance
i
could be granted without derogating from or nullifying the intent
of the By-Law.
The Petioners , therefor , respectfully request that this
Board grant a variance in this instance. The financial hardship
facing the Petitioners is gr ve and immediate. Without this
LAW OFFICES of variance they will in .all li lihood be forced to sell the home
IEGINALD L MARDEN.P.C. -
W CENTRAL OTREET
ANDOVER.MAGE.OVOID I
TOW 5017)470.0477
in which they have lived foi almost fifteen years. Moreover,
the relief sought would in no way disrupt the - surrounding neigh-
borhood, and would most lik ly result in more tax dollars being
paid to the Town of North A doves. In conclusion, the relief
sought is both proper and reasonable, and would benefit both the
Petitioners and the Town of North Andover.
LAW OFFICES OF
REGINALD L MARDEN.P.C.
E!CENTRAL STREET
ANDOVER..MASS. 01030:
-3-
TEL, (017) 470 t7
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
PETITION OF DANIEL AND ADELE
MCCONAGHY PURSUANT TO M.G.L.
CHAPTER 40A SECTION 1b AND
SECTION 10.8 OF THE ZONING
BY-LAW OF THE TOWN OF NORTH
ANDOVER
Now come the petition rs, Daniel and Adele McConaghy,
59 Appleton Street, North An over, Mass. , and request that this
Board allow a rehearing on tie within Variance Petition
(attached hereto) pursuant t3 M.G.L. Chapter 40 Section lb,
and Section 10.8 of the Zoni g By-Law.
The petitioners state that, pursuant to the statute
and By-Law, the Planning Board of the town of North Andover
has unanimously consented to the re-submission of the Variance
Petition. (Copy of petition and decision attached as Exhibit "A"
Wherefore, the petiti vers request that the Zoning Board
of Appeals allow a rehearing on the attached Petition for a
Variance .
Daniel McConaghy and
Adele McConaghy
their attor'
Reginald L. Marden
Law Offices of
Reginald L. Marden, P.C.
23 Central Street
Andover, MA. 01810
Telephone: 470-0477
LAW OFFICES OF
REGINAL)L MARDEN. P.C.
'ES CENTRAL STREET
ANDOVER,MASS.0I810
TEL: (017)470-0477
Exhibit A PHIIIH �O�t10
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
MASSACHUSETTS
183 ) NOw)M
O
h
A
•
October 5 , 1983
Mr. Daniel Long, Town Clerk
Town Office Building
North Andover, Mass . - 01845
Re : Daniel and Adele McConaghy
59 Appleton Street
Dear Mr. Long:
The Planning Board held a public hearing on Monday evening,
October 3 , 1983 on the petition of Daniel and Adele MCConaghy .
The hearing was advertised in the North Andover Citizen on
September 15 and 22 , 1983 and all abutters were notified by
regular mail . The following members were present and voting : I
Michael P. Roberts , Vice Chairman ; John A . James , Jr. , Esq . ,
Clerk ; John J . Burke ; and Erich W. Nitzsche.
The petitioners are requesting the consent of the Planning
Board to resubmit a petition for a variance to the North
Andover- Zoning Board of Appeals , pursuant to M .G .L . Chapter
40-A, Section 16 and the. North Andover Zoning By Law , Section
109 Paragraph 10. 8.
The petitioners testified through counsel that they were denied
a variance to subdivide their property into two lots on June 6 ,
1983, being Petition No . 30- ' 83 . The property is located in the
R-2 zoning district at 59 Appleton Street . Without the consent '
of the Planning Board , they would be forced to wait two years
before resubmitting their request.
Upon a motion made by Mr. Burke and seconded by Mr. James , the
Board voted unanimously to grant permission to the .petitioners '
to re-apply for a variance to the Board of Appeals for property
located at 59 Appleton Street .
Si ncererl�r ,
Michael P. Roberts ,
jw
Vice Chairman
North Andover Planning Board
Petition of Daniel and Adele; McConaghy
Pursuant to M, G.L. Chapter 40A Section 16
Theetitioner
p s herein Daniel and Adele McCona h
8 59
Appleton Street
tflrth Andover, Massachusetts, respecu
ly..
request : pursuant to M. G.L. Chapter 40A Section 16, the consent
of The Planning Board to resubmit a petition for a variance to
The North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals.
1. Prior Proceeding
The initial application for a Variance filed with the Board
of Appeals sought relief from the provisions of Section T,
Paragraph 7. 1 and table 2 of the North Andover Zoning By-Law,
to wit : a division of land one lot to two lots, having less
than the required area. (See Exhibit A attached hereto" ,
Application for Relief from the Requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance" , dated
The initial application for a Variance (Exhibit A)
submitted by the petitioners was denied by The Board of Appeals
in a written decision dated June 8, 1983. (Exhibit B attached
hereto, " Notice of Decision" ) In denying the petition, The
Board of Appeals found "that the evidence presented by the
petitioner failed to show a hardship as required by Section
10. 4 of the Zoning By-Law. "
1I. Grounds for Re-Submission Pursuant to M. G.L. Chapter 40A
Section 16.
t
The petitioners believe that there are sufficient
grounds to warrant a re-submission of their request for a
Variance within two (2) years of the denial of their original
petition. As grounds, the petitioners state that they were not
represented by legal counsel in either the preparation of the
original application, or at the hearing on the Variance before
The Board of Appeals. Without the benefit of legal assistance,
the petitioners were unaware of the specific statutory
requirements necessary for the granting a variance, and
therefore or
e were not able toresent evidence ce on the necessary
requirements at the hearing before The Board of Appeals. The
petitioners believe that they can, in fact, meet the statutory_
requirements of M. G.L. Chapter 40A Section 10 for the8 rantin8
of a variance and request that this Board allow them to
LAW OFFICES of re-appear before the Zoning Board of Appeals to present their
E6fNALD L MARDEN.P.C. new petition. (See Revised Application attached as Exhibit. C) . I
IAS G6NTRAL$TRE[T -
I
ncviR.1u66.o1410 The petitioners also believe that they would be severely
prejudiced by having to wait two (2) years before filing a new
7[L /6171 470.0477
variance petition. As was stated above, the petitioners had
adequate grounds for a variance at the first hearing, but were
unfamiliar with the law and proceduie' involved, and therefore
failed to ,demonstrate those grounds. ' Further, no prejudice
will come to any other interested parties in this matter if a
new hearing is allowed, ,as The Zoning Board acknowledged in its
decision that neighbors of the petitioners supported the
vartance st re ue
q
> and no Opposition was voiced at the first
hearing. Allowing the petitioners to again appear before The
Board of Appeals on this issue would be in the interest of
fairness and justice, and would have no adverse affect on any
of the parties involved.
III. Request for the Consent of The Planning Board
1
Pursuant to M. G.Z. Chapter 40A Section 16, all but one of
the members of this Board must consent to the petitioners
request to re-appear before The Board of Appeals. By
consenting to the within petition, this Board will be doing no
more that allowing the petitioners to re-appear before The
Board of Appeals, and in no way would this consent usurp any
power or authority of The Baord of Appeals. The petitioner
therefore, respectfully request that this Board consent to the
within petition, and allow them to proceed again with the
application for Variance before The Board of Appeals.
Respectfully submitted,
Daniel and Adele McConaghy
by their attorney -
t
Reginald L. Marden
Law Offices of
Reginald L. Marden, P .C. F
23 Central Street €
Andover, MA. 01810
Telephone : 470-0477
LAW OFFICES OF
GINALD L MARDEN.P.C.
fi CENTRAL STREET .
COVER.MARS. O10f*
ITRL• (817)/70 77
�6RB�IDG BDADD
RCCt#' tG TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
MASSACHUSETTS
f NORTI,
Oct Ii � �I 'B3 c,.'..
� A
A
i y
October 5 , 1983
Mr . Daniel Long , Town Clerk
Town Office Building
North Andover, Mass . 01845
Re : Daniel and Adele McConaghy
59 Appleton Street
Dear Mr, Long
The 'Planning Board held a public hearing .on Monday evening,
October 3 1983 on the petition of Daniel and Adele McConaghy .
The ihearing was advertised in the North Andover Citizen on
September 15 and 22 , 1983 and all abutters were notified by
regular mail . The following members ;were present and voting :
Michael P . Roberts , Vice Chairman ; John A . James, Jr. , Esq . ,
Clerk ; John J . Burke; and Erich W. Nitzsche .
The petitioners are requesting the consent of the Planning
Board to resubmit a petition for a variance to the North
Andover Zoning Board of Appeals , pursuant to M .G.L . Chapter
40-A', Section 16 and the North Andover Zoning By Law , Section
10, Paragraph 10 . 8.
The petitioners testified through counsel that they were denied
a variance to subdivide their property into two lots on June 6 ,
19183, being Petition No . 30- ' 83 . The property is located in the
R-2 zoning district at 59 Appleton Street . Without the consent
of the Planning Board , they would be forced to wait two years
before resubmitting their request .
Upon a motion made by Mr . Burke and seconded by Mr . James , the
Board voted unanimously to grant permission to the petitioners
to re-apply for a variance to the Board of Appeals for property
located at 59 Appleton Street .
Since rel ,
Michael P . Roberts ,
Vice Chairman
Jw
Any appeal shall be filed
R E C�'� �D ��.°4 ,ti within (20) days after the
DAHI L NG ,3;' date of filing of this Notice
140E-r ! '- VER t~�. i��$ �:� in the Office of the Town
s'•
�iciiu��
JUN 15 it 29 Am 083 Clerk,
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
MASSACHUSETTS
'BOARD OF APPEALS
NOTICE OF DECISION
June 8 , 1983
Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petition No.. 30-.'.8 3. . . . . . . . . . .
Date of Hearing. M Y. .9.,. .l 98 3
petition of . DANIEL AND ADELE McCONAGHY
Premises affected . . 5.9. Appleton Street. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Relerring to the above petition for a variation from the requirements of the . . Zoni nq, BX. . .
Law, . Rection . 7.,. .Paragraph. 7..1 and Table 2
soas to permit . .the .di_vision .of . land .from. one. .lot. to. two, lot.q . .having
less than the required area.
After a public hearing given on the above date, the Board of Appeals voted to . .DENY. . . . : the
pe.tk t?Qxi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�eo��}re c atlrac aftdisg:�K 7[
RM01MV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i�r�w:r�bruotioa�t�wc�[)saca �bai�ac � �
Signed
Frank .Serio, _ 9h
! ichard. .J.. Trepanier, Esq._, . Clerk
ivan. . . . . . . . . . . . . : . .
Augustine. W, NiekprAc?R . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . .
Board of Appeals
Any appeal shall be filed
N°NTM within (20) days after the
date of filing of this Notice
° t in the Office of. the Town
3VER
Clerk.
,JON
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER
MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEALS
June 8 , 1983
Mr. Daniel Long, Town Clerk Petition No. 30-183
Town Office Building Daniel and Adele McConaghy
North Andover, Mass. 01845 59 Appleton Street
Dear Mr. Long:
The Board of Appeals held a public hearing on Monday evening,
May 9 , 1983 upon the application of Daniel and Adele McConaghy.
The hearing was advertised in the Lawrence Eagle Tribune on
April 23 and 30 , 1983 and all abbuters were notified by regular
mail. The following members were present and voting: Frank
Serio, Jr. , Chairman; Alfred E. Frizelle, Esq. , Vice Chairman;
Richard J. Trepanier, Esq. , Clerk; William J. Sullivan; and
Augustine W. Nickerson.
The Board rendered their decision at a Special Meeting held on
Monday evening, June 6 , 1983 with the following members present
and voting: Frank Serio, Jr. , Chairman; Richard J. Trepanier,
Esq. , Clerk; William J. Sullivan; and Augustine W. Nickerson.
The petitioner seeks a variance from the provisions of Section 7 ,
Paragraph 7. 1 and Table 2 of the zoning By Law to permit the di-
vision of land from one lot into two lots , having less than the
required area, on premises located at 59 Appleton Street.
The petitioner testified that he purchased the property in 1968..
He proposes to create a new lot, shown as Lot 2 on the plan, of
28,400 square feet in area. The lot on which his dwelling is
located, shown as Lot 1 on the plan, would consist of 33,400
square feet. Both lots would contain adequate frontage on
Appleton Street and the setback requirements would be met for
both lots. There are two deeds on record and the petitioner
receives separate tax bills for the property.
He further testified that there are several lots in the neighborhood
containing 20 ,000 square feet or less. The recent 100% re-valuation
of property has increased his taxes so that he can no longer afford
to keep the land open.
Daniel and Adele McConaghy DAbELIIONG
Petition No. 30-183 TOS! 4 �LRK
June 8, 1983 NORTH, ROVER
Page 2 JUN 15 1129 AM '83
Several neighbors presented a letter supporting the petition and
no opposition was voiced.
A motion was made by Mr. Nickerson and seconded by Mr. -Trepanier.
to grant the variance as requested.
The motion failed, with member Nickerson voting in favor and mem-
bers Serio, Trepanier, and Sullivan voting in opposition.
Therefore, the petition is denied, pursuant to M.G.L. , Chapter 40-A,
and the Zoning By Law of the Town of North Andover, Section 10 ,
Paragraph 10 . 4 (2) .
In denying the petition, the Board finds that Section 10.4 of the
Zoning By Law has not been satisfied. Specifically, the Board
finds that the evidence presented by the petitioner failed to
show a hardship as required by Section 10.4 of the Zoning By Law.
Sincerely,
ARD OF APPEALS
Cz
Frank Serio, . ,
Chairman
FS/jw
Received by Town Clerks DOM LIPO
����1�►`C} ��
N0�?�; Al,G4VEH
{
.JUL
$
Z 54
TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEALS
APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
Applicant.Adele & Daniel McConaghy Address 59 Appleton Street
1. Application is hereby made:
r�r
a) For a variance from the requirements of Section Paragraph
and Table of the Zoning By Laws
b) For a Special Permit under Section Paragraph of the Zoning
By Laws . <.F
0c) As a Party Aggrieved, for review of a decision made by the
Building Inspector or other authority. Board of Appeals.
2. a) Premises affected are landx and building(s ) numbered
52 Appleton Street Street .
b) Premises affected are property with frontage on the North ( }
South ( ) East ( ) West ( ) side of
Street, and known as No. Street.
e) Premises affected are in Zoning District , and the premises
affected have an area of square feet and frontage of
feet .
5 3. Ownership
a) Name and address of owner ( if joint ownership, give all names):
ry
Adele & Daniel McConahy ire
'
Date of Purchase February 69 Previous Owner William Broughton
b) If applicant is not owner, check his/her interest in the premises:
Prospective Purchaser Lesee Other (explain) f1
` feet deep; '
Size of proposed building: front;
PHeight stories; feet.
a) Approximate date of erection: - "
n b) Occupancy or use of each floor: '
c) Type of construction: __ Wood •
5.' ' Size of existing buildings feet front; feet deep; <:
Height stories; feet . S`
Y
a) Approximate date of erection: s�
b) Occupancy or use of each floors Residential
c ) Type of construction: l-0—A-
6. ' Has there been a previous appeal, under zoning, on these premises?
Yes If so, when? December 1983 t
The Petitioners respectfully request the deletion of the
condition that the existing dwelling on Lot 1 tie into the
sewer line down Appleton Street from Dale Street (please see
Notice of Decision dated December 22 , 1983)
DANIE! LONG
7: Description of relief sought on this petition end" g amendment
which states that Lot #1 tie into the sewerjut 21 8 54 AM '86
8. Deed recorded in the Registry of Deeds in Book 7 Pa e
5� Y 17 8 g 1.,2
Land Court Certificate No. Book Page
The principal points upon which I base my application are as follows:
(must be stated in detail )
I
Existing septic system functions groperlyt that the cost to tie into the '
sewer line is unreasonably expensive and the job i cu ; and thato o � r
_so would not result in any improvement and;therefore , - this Condition is
unnecessary.
I agree to pay the filing fee, advertising in newspaper , and incidental
expo ses* dn A
t. }
S. • n re "of Petitfo er s
v
' Every application for action by the Board shall be made on a form
by the Board. These forms 'shall be furnished by the Clerk upon request.
Any communication purporting to be application shall be treated as mere
notice of intention to seek relief until such time as it is made on the
official application form. All information called for by the form shall
'be furnished by the applicant in the manner therein prescribed.
t
> Every application shall be submitted with a list of "Parties In Interest" y •
which list shall include the petitioner, abutters, owners of land directly ' sa
opposite on any public or private street or way, and abutters to the
abutters within three hundred feet (300 ' ) of the property line of the
petitioner as they appear on the most recent applicable tax list,
notwithstanding that the land of any such owner is located in another city % • -j,
or town, the Planning Board of the city or town, and the Planning Board
' every abutting city or town.
l 14
*Every application shall be submitted with an application charge cost
the amount of $25. 00. In addition, the petitioner shall be responsible
. for any and all costs involved in bringing the petition before the .Board. *�
Such costs shall include mailing and publication, but are not necessari ly'1 .j
limited to these.
Every application. shall be submitted with a plan of land approved by the
Board. No petition will be brought before the Board unless said plan has ''t'x,=a
t
been submitted. Copies of the Board ' s requirements regarding plans are
attached hereto or are available from the Board of Appeals upon request. '
LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST , .
Name Address:
*� ry
Paul & Virginia E Dyer 41 Appleton
Clementine Lambert & Barbara Mary Smith m 58 Appleton "
dean E. Stannard 97 Appleton r
. .Salvatore & Doris Liceiardello 113 Appleton t .
Gam,
Alfred E. & Noreen M Frizelle 131 Appleton
William 3 & Mary McDonald 106 Appleton +
Robert B. . & Eleanor M. Hay 100 Appleton
Ridgely B. & Fannie R. Underwood 153 Dale Street
R. Ashton & Gwendolen Smith 158 Dale Street
Andrew J. & Mary R. Moynihan 141 Dale Street
New England Power Company g •,
x..
�aq
(use additional sheets if necessary) .
Y
All
Oversized Maps on file with the Town