HomeMy WebLinkAboutFERREIRA, JOHN MUMU IIECEIVEC
apNiE cLo
TOWN OF NORTH ANT) OVER TOwNAh� VER
HASSAC31USETTs µpR,�
NOR
+O' t
yA4o
toy 'O°•n.•••ry4`�
CNUSE�
dMdONofthatMOM NOTICE OF DECISION
In ft of Ow To+1vn
CMlc.
Date. June. 3, 19886 . . . . °°0 4 4 °
1 . 10 . . . . .
Mite of Ilearing June 2,. 1988. . . . . .
Petition of John Ferreira . , , . . . . , . . . . • . .. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premises affected . . , 980. Osgood.Street, North_ Andover. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Referring to the above petition for a special permit from the requirements
of the aid APAPAT. .*ecttaij .1,6.
so as to permit ,th4t reconsideration•of- specific, and,material changes, in, condYt}qns
which� the.previous unfavorable action was based. on•by.the Zoning. Board of Appeals.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
After a public hearing given on the above date, the Planning Board voted
to . . .p:LLOW. . . . . . . . .the Petitioner,tore-petition, to. the�Zoninp Board of.Appealss
based upon the following conditions
Signed
cc Director of Public Works
Highway Surveyor Paul. A..Hedstromy Chairman, , . , , . . .
Board of Public Works
Tree Warden Ce rjge. Perna; Vice-Chairman
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Building inspector
Board of Health JoI. eSiVIPVLP .Ciigxk . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Conservation
Assessors Erich Nitzsglq
Police Chief, Engineer
Fire Chief, Interested Parties Michael .Leary
Applicant, File '' ' ' ' ' ' 'plunni�g Board °
Texaco Station - Repetitive Petition
Pursuant to Chapter 40A, Section lb and Section 10.8 of the Zoning
Bylaw, the Planning Board finds that the petition before us has the
following specific and material changes in conditions upon which the
Board of APpeal.s based its previous unfavorable action:
1 . The applicant was unable to have a proper hearing
before the Board of Appeals due to his failure to
appear or to request and extension on his
application. Due to the statutory time constraints
imposed upon the Board , a decision has to be made and
filed with the Town Clerk . The Planning Board finds
that the applciant has not had a full and complete
hearing on his application and is entitled to have the
matter decided upon the merits of his proposal .
2. The Board of Appeals requested additional information
be supplied by the applicant in order to adequately
review his application. The Planning Board finds that
the applciant has plans which should prove sufficient
to the Board of Appeals to properly review and take
action on his proposal .
3 . The new plans presented to the Planning Board during
the public hearing show changes to the proposal not
originally before the Board of Appeals at the time
they denied the application. Further the Planning
Board has discussed and the applicant has agreed to
place the proposed canopy further back from the Route
125 right-of-way, remove any signage from the canopy
and to place additional landscaping on his site to
further screen the site from Route 125.
The reasons cited above enable the Planning Board to hereby consent to
allow the petitioner to re-petition the Zoning Board of Appeals.
Signed :
PLANNING BOARD
c
.a V-W .Z
u
M
LUsAr- Paul A. Hed'strom,
°.'dAw- M Chairman
� 2
"'7