HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-05-17· lann~ng Boar~ Meeting
M~nutes
~ ~?~ 1994
Sen~or ce=ret
The meeting was called to order at 7:20 p.m.
M~hers Present
Richard
Daghlian.
John Simons arrived at 9:40 p.m.
Nardella, Chairman, Richard Rowen, Clerk, and John
Also present was Kathleen Bradley Colwell, Town Planner.
[Note: Michael Pansavoy - Prospective Planning Board member
attended]
ADS - Desi_cm Review
Mr. Thomas Grape told the Board ground breaking should start in
July.
Mr. Nardella discussed use of function rooms for town meetings.
Mr. Grape showed the Board a smaller footprint of the proposed
building. Clapboard siding, "Cape Cod Grey", double hung windows,
covered porches, cedar shake with a slightly lighter colored grey
are proposed.
Site Changes:
4
4.
5.
6.
reduced the number of parking spaces in front along the
entry circle.
lowered grade of parking to address drainage concerns of
neighbors
sloped granite curbing on main drive
additional landscaping
more green space, less building
detention area to left of the building, catch basins tied
into detention area, will only be standing water
immediately after a rainstorm, grassed area.
Mr. Nardella stated that trees will be added along Route 125, the
developer may need permission from the state to plant in the right-
of-way. Mr. Nardella questioned if there were street construction
issues.
Mr. Grape told Mr. Nardella that there will be some utility work
necessary in the road but nothing substantial.
On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Daghlian, the Board voted
to approve elevation and building materials.
Phillios Comon - Entranc~
Mr. Thomas Laudani, representing Homeowners Association, told the
Board that the Homeowners Association would like to continue
lighting the Phillips Common sign. Mr. Nardella stated that the
sign is on commonly owned land. Mr. Rowen told Mr. Laudani that
the Homeowners Association should address the issue with the
Building Inspector.
The Planning Board decision required the lighting to be removed
prior to acceptance of the street by the Town. The Town has now
accepted the street therefore the lights must be removed. If the
Homeowners want to keep the sign lit, they must go to the Code
Enforcement Officer for a determination.
Lot Release/9oad Set
Christmas Tree Estates - Lot Release
White Birch Construction sold Christmas Tree Estates to Belford
Construction. Belford Construction will now be responsible for the
construction of the subdivision.
Mr. Joseph Cristaldi was present. There is 146 ft. of existing
pavement on South Bradford Street in front of Lot 1. Mr. cristaldi
was requesting the release of Lot 1 only at this time.
There was a discussion that $8,000 site opening bond was
sufficient.
Mr. Nardella stated that no more lots will be released until the
entire roadway bond has been posted.
On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Daghlian, the Board voted
to release LOt 1, Christmas Tree Estates. The Chairman also voted
in the affirmative.
Cobblestone Crossina Phase I! - Postina Bond/Lot Release
Ms. Colwell read a letter from D.P.W. recommending a $28,695 bond
be posted.
Mr. Laudani requested the release of Lots 18, 19 , 20, 21 and 22 in
Cobblestone II.
A motion was made by Mr. Daghlian to accept bond of $28,695 as
recommended by D.P.W. There was no second.
On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by, Mr. Daghlian, the Board
voted to accept a bond amount of $28,695 plus 10% ($31,564). The
Chaizman also voted in the affirmative.
On a motion byMr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Daghlian, the Board voted
to release the site opening bond upon receipt of the roadway bond.
The Chairman also voted in the affirmative.
Lot 14 Fullor ROad - Lot Release
Attorney Swartz was present requesting a release of the covenant on
Lot 14 Fuller Road.
On a motlon by Mr. Daghlian, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted
to release Lot 14 Fuller Road. The Chairman also voted in the
affikmative.
~erad Place II! - Definitive Subdivision/Special Permit PR~
Mr. Rowen read the legal notices to open the public hearings.
Mr. Thomas Here was present representing Mr. Robert Janusz.
gave the Board the following info£mation:
He
Phase III of developing Mr. Janusz' land
reviewed property under conventional zoning which is
partially R-2 and with the majority in R-1
road exit from Candlestick and extend approximately 900
ft. of roadway
all lots but one serviced by subdivision road, all have
required acreage, CBA, frontage and have passed Board of
Health septic tests
Ms. Colwell to check date of endorsement of Jerad II plan.
PRD Plan:
minimum of 25,000 sq. ft. allowed, all lots are greater
than 40,000 sq. ft.
50 ft. buffer zone line shown on plans
wetland line shown on plans
· 50 ft. no construction zone
25 ft. not cut zone
no variances required
waiver of roadway length is the only subdivision waiver
requested
35% open space required in a PRD
creates greenbelt along Forest Street and keeps open
water wetland available as open space
nearest house to Forest Street will be 300 ft. away
roadway is the same length in both conventional and PRD
plan
Mr. Nardella stated that the Board previously reviewed this under
a request for a determination of the zoning. The Board requested
that Mr. Neve go through the calculation of lots under the
conventional subdivision. Three 1 acre lots in Jerad II are
reconfigured. One 1 acre lot remains in Jerad II on Sugarcane
Lane, two 1 acre lots become part Of Jerad Place III.
The conventional plan has two i acre lots and six 2 acre lots.
The detention ponds designed to mitigate run-off, retain/detain
water - sto~mwater mitigation and to "clean" water before it is
released to protect watersheds. The ponds will hold a 12 hour
volume of water.
Mr. Daghlian asked how close will the houses be?
3,200 sq. ft. footprints shown
Lot i & 2 Lot 2 & 3 LOt 3 & 4
The response:
80 ft. 100 ft. 60 ft.
Mr. Rowen stated that the extension of Sugarcane Lane used leaching
pits in the island to avoid detention/retention ponds. He
questioned whether this was possible for the Jerad III island.
Mr. Neve stated that 250 ft. of road drains to the cul-de-sac
without any basins, water will run in a swale along lot lines in to
wetlands.
Mr. Nardella - catch basins at end of road draining into cul-de-
sac.
Issues of sidewalks was discussed..
Mr. Neve said possible use of sidewalk money to tie water-line into
Forest Street.
Mr. Nardella had questions of site distance on Candlestick. Mr.
Neve stated that there is a 30' pavement radius at entrance to
Candlestick.
Mr. Nardella asked that discussions continue to June 7 meeting, to
discuss drainage, sidewalks, roadway width, island width.
Mr. Peter Besson, Candlestick Road, questioned as to how many
lots/new houses will be created that access Candlestick.
Mr. Neve replied:
8 as part of Jerad II
2 on Sugarcane - existing lots
7 as part of Seven Oaks
17 lots
Mr. Besson asked if economics
marketability.
taken into consideration and
Mr. Nardella replied "no, marketability is not something that the
Board has the power to review." The developer must show a
buildable subdivision. A PRD creates protected open space and
creates 50 ft. no build buffer zone.
Mr. Neve will calculate additional area of open space protected by
50 ft. buffer zone.
Ms. Ann Perry , Sugarcane Lane asked if any filling on lots. Mr.
Neve replied, no filling of wetlands but the site will be graded
for the house sites and septic systems.
Mr. George Perna, D.P.W. Director, asked that the limit of clearing
be shown.
Mr. Neve stated that there was a continuous barrier of erosion
control shown on the plan.
Elizabeth Williams, Candlestick, asked what is the distance between
homes in the conventional plan. Mr. Neve replied that homes are
similar distance apart in both conventional and PRD plans.
Ms. Williams stated that houses would be large for lots. Mr. Neve
told her house footprints are large to give developer flexibility.
Mr. Janusz intends to put same covenants on Phase II and as Phase
III.
Mr. Scott Williams, Candlestick Road, concerned about wetland line.
Mr. Sam Gagliano, Candlestick Road, stated that the intersections
of Forest and Boxford Streets have become dangerous, concerned
about site distance.
Jerry Peterson, Candlestick Road, also had concerns about traffic.
Ms Amy Lyons asked why wasn't Lot 11 included in the subdivision.
Mr. Neve stated that topography of area does not allow for access
across wetland to that lot through the subdivision.
Carolyn Dudman,Sugarcane Lane, asked if the drainage will effect
wetlands. Mr. Neve stated that ponding areas store the water to
settle out particulates and regulate flow into the wetlands,
detention areas and catch basins cleaned out periodically by D.P.W.
Ms Dudman concerned about salt and sand. Mr. Perna stated that
salt and sand was cleaned out in catch basins.
Mr. David Sherman, Candlestick Road, asked if Candlestick Road
drainage be effected. Mr. Neve stated that no drainage from this
road will enter existing roadway.
Mr. Tony Campagne, Boxford Street, asked if any road construction
involved in existing streets. Mr. Neve stated that none is
currently planned however, water main in Forest Street may be
effected.
Mr. Perna stated that from now on with any off site construction,
a developer will have a paid full time person to monitor
construction.
Mr. John Leeman, Pine Ridge Road, asked is the 50 ft. buffer zone
calculated as part of 35% open space. Mr. Neve stated it is where
it is part of the open space.
Mr. Leeman asked when were the wetlands flagged? Mr. Neve replied,
"last spring".
Mr. Leeman asked if any oil or grease traps in catch basins? Mr.
Neve replied, "yes".
Ms. Williams asked what is the direct benefit to the Town of the
open space. Mr. Neve replied, to preserve forested area along
Forest Street.
Mr. Rowen read a memo to the Board from Richard Doucette,
Conservation Administrator, regrading PRD's
John Simons arrived at 9:40 p.m.
Mr. Michael Staff, Sugarcane Lane, asked if construction on both
Seven Oaks and Jerad Place III at the same time? Mr. Rowen said,
probably, Seven Oaks is an approved subdivision.
Mr. Besson asked how many extra lots could be added to Candlestick
Road.
Ms. Elsie Pouliot asked where will Jerad IV go? Mr. Neve replied,
off of Boxford Street.
Ms. Pouliot expressed concerns about the number of septic systems
in the area. Mr. Neve stated that they conform to Town guidelines
which are more stringent than State regulations.
Mr. Nardella stated that discussions would continue to the June 7th
meeting.
Mr. Simons to review all material and notes from discussions that
took place before his arrival.
Bond Reduction
North ;ltndover Estates
The Board reviewed a memo from D.P.W. regarding reduction in the
bond.
Mr. Nardella would recommend release of $6,000.
Mr. Simons stated that there were significant problems on the site,
need to send a message to the developer.
Mr. Nardella concerned about the state of the curbing in the
subdivision.
Keep 189,350 plus 10%.
Mr. Simons wants to send message to the developer and not release
any money.
Mr. Daghlian wants to give the developer $6,000.
Mr. Daghlian made a motion to release $6,000. There was no second.
On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Simons, the Board voted
not to release any money at this time.
Ms. Colwell to confirm total amounts held.
Mr. Nardella to write a letter regarding information needed from
North Andover Estates.
Linda Hartnett, Rosemont Drive, asked why no granite curbing in
front of house. Mr. Perna stated that granite curbing was not
required in subdivision approval, but cape cod berm will be
required.
Booth Street - Bond Reduction
D.P.W. recommended that $14,300 be released for work completed on
the water main and the curbing.
On a motion by Mr. Simons, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted
to release $14,300 for Booth Street.
Villaae Way - Bond R®duotion
Applicant did not have a recommendation from D.P.W. and Planning
Staff needs more time to review documents.
Board did not act on applicant's request.
Public Hearings
SharDners Pond Road - Lot 6 & 7 Special Permit C~..mon Driveway an,~
Lots 8 & 9 SDecial Permit Common Driveway
Mr. Chris White reminded the Board that this was a continuation of
the public hearing on the common driveways for Sharpners Pond Road.
The driveways will be 14 ft wide, paved. The proposal minimizes
impacts to the wetlands.
Lot 9 will have a conservation restriction on back 20 acres.
There will be graded turnouts.
Houses will be built to fit the topography.
On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Simons, the Board voted
to closet he public hearing and directed staff to draft a decision.
approval Not Reauired - Form a Plans
1063 Salem Street
Mr. Rowen stated that for lots that have variances, the Planning
Board should sign it and talk with the ZBA.
Mr. Gene Willis went to the ZBA, discussed the variances with that
Board. It will cause an extreme hardship if it is not signed so
that he can pull a building permit.
On a motion by Mr. Simons, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the board
directed staff to sign the Form A Plan.
15 Rosedale avenue
Frontage, area and setback variances requested and received on lot
from the ZBA.
On a motion by Mr. Rowen seconded by Mr. Simons, the Board directed
staff to sign the Fol~ a Plan.
The ZBA limited lot to single family homes.
On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Simons, the Board
directed staff to sign the Form A Plan.
On a motion by Mr. Simons, seconded by Mr. Rowen,
directed staff to sign the Form A Plan.
Suoaroane Lane
On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Simons,
directed staff to sign the Form A Plan.
Minutes
april 5. 1994
april 7, 1994
aDrfl 12. 1994
the Board
the Board