Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-06-28Planning Board Meeting M~nutes · l~e 28~ 1994 ~r&~ ~on£erence ~oom The meeting was called to order at 7:25 p.m. Members Present Joseph Mahoney, Vice Chairman was acting Chairman, Richard Rowen, Clerk, and Alison Lescarbeau, Associate Member. John Simons arrived at 7:30 p.m. and Richard Nardella, Chairman, arrived at 7:45 p.m. Also present was Karen Nelson, Director of Planning and Community Development. John Daghlian was absent. Authorization For~ Any change in membership is recorded at the Registry of Deeds and in Land Court. With the change of officers and the new Associate member the Board signed two memos reflecting those changes. Woodchuck Grove - Extensio~ Ms. Nelson explained the reason for the request. The developer would like to redesign the subdivision/PRD roadway to minimize the cutting of hillside. The extension of Woodchuck Grove would give the developer time to submit a modification to the approved plan. Mr. Thomas Laudani, developer, spoke to the Board on the proposed. the name will be changes to Pinewood 16 lots as opposed to 17 lots in the original approval · first PRD approved in North Andover · the special permit expires August 1994. · redesign the roadway and improve the current plan On a motion by Mr. Simons, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted to extend the Special Permit for ninety (90) days, to November 16, 1994. Endorsement of Plans - Seven Oaks Definitive Subdivision The developer was asked to provide the Board with an extension to June 29, 1994 for signing the plans. The Planning Board signed the plans for Seven Oaks Definitive Subdivision. Bonds Booth Street - Reductio~ On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted to release $12,620 as per D.P.W. recommendation. NOTE: The Planning Board requested the developer to contribute to sidewalk fund before any other releases are made. PhilliPs COmmOn The Board is holding $16,000 on Phillips Common. D.P.W. recommends the release of all but $5,000. The $5,000 is being held in lieu of the pathway easement which needs to be signed by property owner. On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. simons, the Board voted to release $11,000, holding $5,000 to cover the cost of easement. Poxwood - Bond Release - Form J and For~ G Mr. Thomas Laudani gave the Board the Form J and Form G. Mr. Nardella asked that money been held for maintenance of the stone wall at the entrance. Mr. Laudani told the Board that the stone wall was designed with little maintenance, homeowners will maintain both the stone wall and the island in the roadway. Mr. Nardella reminded Mr. Laudani that the lighting on the entrance will be discontinued when the last lot is sold. The Board questioned which lots were being released, Lot 3 in particular. The bond was increased by $17,000 for three lots. Mr. Nardella reminded Mr. Laudani of the decision. Lots were specified when the phase plan was developed. The decision stands. Lot 3 was taken off the Form J. On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted to release Lots 2, 47 and 48. There are three bonds being held by the Town. $36,000 for erosion control $15,000 site opening $10,000 model home On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted to release $10,000, for site opening and $10,000 for the model home. [Check notes from KBC on Phase II - anything that flows into station 2+50 detention pond is Phase II] Station to be clarified by Mr. Stapinski. Mr. Nardella spoke on construction of the homes in Phase II, if no foundation, lot have to be stabilized. Site work in Phase IA and IB has to be completed. Only twelve (12) lots can be unstable at one time. (NOTE: Planning Board would like copy of Foxwood decision} On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Simons, the Board voted to allow the applicant to work within the area that flows in the detention pond at Station 2+50, not beyond. ADmrova! Not Re~uire~ - Form & Plan~ Marblerid. e/~reat Pon~ Road The applicant wished to withdraw the Form A Plan. On a motion by Mr. Simons, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board accepted the withdrawal without prejudice. Public Hearinqg Beechwoo~ - Industrial Subdivision The Board denied a previous application due to roadway issues. Applicant has met with D.P.W. and has submitted a revised plan in accordance with current roadway regulations. Mr. Phil Christiansen gave the Board a brief presentation of the proposed development. located across from AT&T on Osgood Street existing is a paved roadway D.P.W. concerned with slope of driveway (10% grade) new roadway put in new drainage work 2 new building lots Mr. Simons questioned the lot lines and zoning lines. Mr. Mahoney asked Mr. Christiansen if any of the previous denial issues had been addressed. Mr. Rowen questioned the slope of the new road. Mr. Christiansen told Mr. Rowen that at the beginning the slope is 1% then becomes steep and then levels off a bit. Mr. Nardella questioned parking issues. Mr. Christiansen told the Board that the parking issues are addressed in Site Plan Review, there will be no parking on the street. Mr. Nardella asked about State approval. Mr. Christiansen stated he needed a subdivision approved before going to the State. There is a 60 ft. right-of-way. Mr. Nardella asked applicant to address issues in the previous denial. He also asked the applicant to consider a buffer zone - no cut line at the boundary line. There was a discussion on procedures and what is required on subdivision plans. A site visit has been scheduled for July 18, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. at the site. On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Simons, the Board voted to continue the public hearing to July 19, 1994. Jerad Place ~I - De~ttve SUbdiv~sion Mr. Robert Janusz was present and asked that the public hearing be continued to July 5, 1994. On a motion by Mr. Simons, seconded by Mr. Mahoney, the Board voted to continue the public hearing to July 5, 1994. 525 Turnpike Street - Site Plan Review Mr. Nardella had asked the applicant to come back to the Board with specific changes on the proposed Osco Drug. Mr. Kenneth Hyszczak, Cubellis & Associates, gave the Board the following information regarding the specific changes: clapboards will be used there will be false windows more brick canopy/facade has been extended Mr. Hyszczak showed the Board the type of material to be used. Mr. Hyszczak showed sample of architectural roof shingles. Mr. Simons questioned the roof. Mr. Hyszczak stated that the material will be used on the canopy and the facade. The roof will be flat with mechanicals. Mr. Nardella questioned the height of the building and if the mechanicals would be covered. Mr. Hyszczak told Mr. Nardella the height will be the same as what is there now, 26' to 24', it varies. Mr. Simons spoke on what was presented at Town Meeting when the zoning change was made, it not the same as that which is before the Board now. Mr. Hyszczak stated that what was being proposed was a block building with a steel roof. Mr. Simons would like to see a more natural setting at a pedestrian scale with a village concept, not a building in the middle of the lot. Mr. Nardella stated that the Fire Department needs a 360 degree access. Mr. Gene Joel, American Drug Stores, spoke on the general shape of the building. Mr. Nardella requested them to be more creative of the building shape. Mr. John Edward, McDonough & Scully,Inc., did the traffic study. He summarized the material submitted. building size has been reduced traffic reduced - with two new subdivisions traffic study considered - negating to no change Mr. Simons questioned the ability to make left hand turns to and from the site. Mr. Nardella asked about peak hours. Peak hours are between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. Mr. Nardella asked the Board for their comments. Mr. Mahoney wants to review the traffic study which was received today. Mr. Rowen agrees with Mr. Simons on the proposed building. Mr. Simons reiterated his concerns and personal preferences. Mr. Rowenquestioned the entrance on Route 125, suggested moving it 25 to 30 ft. away from the intersection. Mr. Kennedy tried to answer questions and address concerns. He stated that the traffic before the intersection travels at a higher speed. A blinking light was suggested. Ms. Lescarbeau stated that the proposed was still a square building. She suggested maybe the exterior colors could be changed. Mr. Kennedy stated that he was asked to change the building, he did. He was asked to change the facade and the parking as well, he did. Mr. Kennedy went on to say the he has abided by the zoning bylaw and he has the right to develop the parcel. Mr. Nardella stated that there were substantial improvements made and that the applicant may be in compliance with zoning but he was not happy with the results. Mr. Kennedy asked the Board to consider landscaping being put in and a change to the facade. He asked for a written list from the Board. Issues from the Board: . drainage · traffic · elevations [NOTE: KBC - provide list of what Board wants to Mr. Kennedy] Mr. Nardella asked Mr. Kennedy to give it his best shot at making the necessary changes and present them on July 19, 1994. On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Simons, the Board voted to continue the public hearing to July 19, 1994. Mr. James Towle, Andover-Bypass, asked about a common access from Hillside Road, stating major problems with traffic on Route 125. Mr. Herbert Red]nan, Meadowood Road, spoke on the new curb cut on Route 125 and the traffic issues. Lane - Definitive Subdivision - Special Permit R-6 District Nardella stated that the Board has walked the site. Mr. Phil Christiansen, engineer for the project, told the Board he has not filed with the Conservation Commission for a Notice of Intent. Wetlands have been delineated. Mr. Christiansen asked if the Board was still considering connection with the other subdivisions, those being Meadowood II and Meadowood III. The Board went over the original Master Plan for the R-6 District. They reviewed Meadowood III and Nadine Lane. The Board wants to see a roadway connection between the two proposed developments. Mr. Rowen stated that he would consider a foot path or bike path. However, Mr. Nardella re-emphasized the Planning Board's desire for a road connection, not only a path. Mr. Richard Pellitier stated that this may be an un-permitted process, the connection of the roadway due to the amount of wetland filling involved. Mr. Nardella asked Mr. Christiansen if he was in compliance with zoning. Mr. Christiansen replied, "yes". Mr. Nardella asked if the sidewalks were on the same side of the roadway in Meadowood I, Meadowood II, Meadowood III and Nadine La~eo Mr. Christiansen stated that cape cod berm would be used. [NOTE: KBC, KN and RN attend next Conservation Commission Meeting - regarding R-6 District] On a motion by Mr. Simons, seconded by Mr. Mahoney, the Board voted to continue the public hearing to July 19, 1994. District Mr. Laudani spoke to the Board on zoning issues. Mr. Laudani stated that Lot 13, Meadowood II, was one house lot not built on. He stated he could further subdivide the lot as a modification to Meadowood II. Mr. Simons stated that this was not an issue with him. He further stated that if Mr. Laudani had the parcel to begin with it would have been included in Meadowood II. Mr. Nardella stated that a variance was granted for 2.9 acres as opposed to the required 3 acres. Mr. Simons spoke the intent of the 3 acre minimum requirement for the R-6 District. Ms. Nelson asked for the total acres in Meadowood I and Meadowood II. Mr. Stapinski replied, "16 acres". Ms. Nelson asked for the number of lots. Mr. Stapinski answered, "36 lots". There was a lengthy discussion on Lot 13 and re-looked at the R-6 scheme that was laid out for these parcels a year ago which was in the Planning Board file. Mr. Nardella wanted the Board to think about the issue with Lot 13. On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted to continue the public hearing to July 19, 1994. Karblerid~e ROad - Special Pe~nit - Common Driveways Mr. Stapinski went over the plans with the Board. Mr. Mahoney questioned the legality of the frontage with a guard rail. Ms. Nelson stated that wetlands covered frontage on a portion of Lot 5. Mr. Stapinski showed the Board a conventional subdivision. Mr. Simons suggested putting in a private road (sub-standard) with one curb cut across from the lake. Mr. Nardella stated that a deed with restriction would keep the roadway private. Mr. Mahoney left the meeting at 11:00 p.m. Mr. Stapinski reiterated, build road with waiver on standards and with restrictions. A consultant will review the plans and No~mandeau Study and be paid for by the developer as agreed. Mr. Stapinski asked to extend the time of re-filing for subdivision. The Board did not have a problem with the extension. Mr. Stapinski to provide extension in writing. The applicant withdrew the second Form A Plan. On a motion by Mr. Simons, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted to accept the withdrawal without prejudice. May 17. %g~4 June 7. 1994 June 21, 1994 On a motion by Mr. Simons, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted to approve the minutes of May 17, 1994 and June 7, 1994. The Board did not have time to review the minutes of June 21, 1994. &d4 ouz~en~ The meeting adjourned at approximately 11:15 p.m. Eaton, Secretary Richard A. Nardella, Chairman