HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-03-30Planning Board Meeting
March 30, 1993
Minutes
Senior Center
The meeting was called to order at 7:12 p.m.
Members Present
George Perna, Chairman, John Simons, Richard Nardella, Joseph
Mahoney, and Richard Rowen. John Draper was absent. Kathleen
Bradley, Town Planner was also present.
Election of Officers
Mr. Perna read his resignation letter given to James Gordon, Town
Manager. Mr. Perna also read a letter from Mr. Gordon, accepting
his resignation as Chairman and appointing him as an Associate
Member until June 30, 1993.
Mr. Rowen read a letter from Mr. Gordon appointing him as a regular
member of the Planning Board until June 30, 1993.
Mr. Rowen suggested that every six months membership should be
overlapping for Planning Board Members.
Mr. Perna stated that nominations for the Chairman would be by
voice vote.
Chairman
Mr. Nardella was nominated by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Mahoney
and voted unanimously by those present.
Vice-Chairman
Mr. Simons was nominated by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Rowen and
voted unanimously by those present.
Clerk
Mr. Mahoney was nominated by Mr. Nardella, seconded by Mr. Rowen
and voted unanimously by those present.
Discussions
Os~ood Mill Update - Buildinq to Town
Mr. Nardella gave an update to the Board on the Osgood Mill stone
building to be deeded to the Town. One of the issues is handicap
accessibility.
Mr. Perna gave a brief update on the access issue across the
Modicon Property.
Seven Oaks Modifioation- Definitive Subdivision
Ms. Bradley gave an overview of recent discussions between Richard
Doucette and herself regarding changes on the plans.
Phil Christiansen and RomUs Brickus gave historical background of
the subdivision and surrounding subdivision plans.
Issues:
Roadway width 24'
cul-de-sac 100' right-of-way and the 80' pavement.
Bill Hmurciak has to review the raodway layout.
Were fees paid in 19877
public hearing required for modification? Yes.
Open space conveyance - who to?
The applicant will work with staff to resolve submittal issues.
Public Hearings
Cobblestone Crossinq - Definitive Subdivision/PPn
D.P.W. issues presented by Mr. Perna:
2.
3.
4.
5.
drainage calculations not satisfactory
looping water to Cranberry Lane
natural drainage of land not accounted for
elevations do not match on separate plan sheets
sewer and water main locations cannot be at the same
elevation
D.P.W. does not have a problem with double cul-de-sac for this
project.
Applicant must address issues of D.P.W. with Bill Hmurciak.
A1 Shaboo, Environeers, Inc., showed the Board the following:
rendering of entrance to subdivision from Mass. Avenue
renderings of each house to be constructed.
a. house types were designated on each lot
The developer has added existing parcels to the entire project to
create a total of 10.4+/- acres. This also created additional open
space.
The Board was presented with two options for the additional open
space.
Alte~
Is to make the Form A lot a 17th PRD Lot and preserve
open space around it. This would create greenspace along
Route 125 to shelter homes.
Mr. Nardella asked if Alternate A was chosen, if there was anything
to do to create more buffer along the back of the "99".
Alternative B
Is to dedicate the existing vacant lot bordering on the
"99" Restaurant as open space and keep the lot on the
corner of Mass. Avenue and Route 125 as a For A lot.
Mr. Rowen would rather go with Alternative B because he wants to
buffer the "99" as much as possible.
Mr. Mahoney agreed with leaving existing Form A lot on the corner
with open space next to the "99".
The Board decided to go with Alternative B - dedicate existing
vacant lot next to the "99" Restaurant as open space. Create Form
A lot on the corner of Mass. Avenue and Route 125
Barrier Issues:
A1 Shaboo stated that a berm was infeasible due to large size of
clearing required. A fence was suggested but there are maintenance
issues and the potential for destruction by "99" patrons.
Mr. Shaboo suggested the construction of a 4 foot stone wall.
a. minimal maintenance
b. keep in character with surrounding area
c. There would be minimal grading without cutting
trees. Keep people, headlights out of subdivision.
Mr. Mahoney stated that impenetrable landscape barriers exist in
town.
Mr. Rowen asked the developer to plant dense shrubbery in back of
the hemlocks.
Mr. Nardella stated that no planting will block headlights right
away but stone plus plantings would be effective.
No cut zone found on lots must be on plans and in the deed
restrictions
Side setbaCk waivers requested on specific lots were acceptable to
the Board.
There were no abutters present at this meeting.
Ms. Bradley recommended the Board close the public hearing.
On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Perna the Board voted to
close the public hearing on both the definitive subdivision and the
special permit.
NOTE: Alternate member is voting member for tonight's meeting.
On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted
to take the matter under advisement on both the definitive
subdivision and the special permit. Decision will be considered at
the April 6, 1993 meeting.
Booth Street - Definitive Subdivision
Attorney Ralph Joyce gave a presentation of the history of the site
and the application process.
There is a 40ft. right-of-way. There are grading issues. There is
a hammerhead configuration for the cul-de-sac that is in the right-
of-way with utilities proposed. The cul-de-sac option requires a
deed to the Town. Streets as shown on plans are "private ways open
to the public".
The Board would like to see documents granting right to access to
people in subdivision.
Mr. Perna wants to make sure that what ever utilities are placed in
the road are able to be connected to future development.
ISSUES
1. Applicant and staff need to understand ingress/egress
issues.
2. Question of whether you can build in roadway.
Need something definitive.
3. Meet with D.P.W. to resolve grade issues.
Ms. Bradley to coordinate a meeting before next Tuesday.
On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Simons, the Board voted
to continue the public hearing to obtain additional information.
232 Sutton Street - Site Plan Revie~
John Leeman, an employee of Mr. Matses was present.
Dr. Chatterjee has attempted to meet with Mr. Matses
Mr. Matses is on vacation
On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Simons the Board voted to
continue the public hearing to April 6, 1993.
Disou~
White B'rch I
Mr. Nardella asked the Board if they would endorse a motion to ZBA
for a variance in PRD size. The Board needs to review the file to
make a recommendation.
Applicant directed to go to ZBA as soon as possible.
Waaon Wheels Estates - Reauest for Extension
The Board would like the developer to come in to discuss certain
issues regarding, sidewalks and tie ins to Woodland Estates.
Questions were raised as to Karen Nelson being able to sign Form A
Plans. The Lawrence Registry has no record. The Board directed
the Planning Staff to draft a letter to the Registry granting Karen
Nelson authority to sign Form A Plans.
Decisions
Stevens Crossina - Definitive Subdivision & Special Permit PRD
The landscape plan was reviewed.
A letter to the file is needed from Tom Laudani regarding escrow of
Form A Plan.
Variances will be required for the 50ft. buffer zone even though
they have a Form A Plan in escrow.
D.P.W. has a problem with the placement of trees, wants trees on
owners land.
Mr. Simons asked why Planning Board designs were always driven by
D.P.W. constraints.
The street tree issue tabled for moment.
Staff to review and oversee plantings to create a barrier along the
High School and Rockwell's property. There will be screening along
the Larson Property.
Questions were raised as to who maintains landscaping around the
entry sign.
supported by easement
homeowners association takes care if this
on the model home - the Board will want to have bond money up-front
in return for lot release.
D.P.W. has to establish an amount for performance security.
Mr. Bill Rockwell read a letter from Mr. Kettenbach.
On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted
to take the matter under advisement until the next meeting.
Decision will be available at the April 6, 1993 meeting.