Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-06-01Ple~ing Board Meeting Minutes June 1, 1993 Cafeteria & - High School The meeting was called to order at approximately 7:10 p.m. Members Present: Richard Nardella, Chairman, John Simons, Vice-Chairman, Joseph Mahoney, Clerk, Richard Rowen and George Perna. John Draper arrived at 8:15 p.m. Also present were Kathleen Bradley, Town Planner and Karen Nelson, Director of the Division of Planning & Community Development. Osaood Mill - (Sutton Pond) Mr. Richard Kaminski, Richard Kaminski Associates, represents "Brickstone Properties" and the proponent of Osgood Mill. Two alternatives for access to the condo complex: Nol 1. Through existing house on High Street Through parking lot out across from Prescott Street Leave ball field alone for present users. Entry way detail shown - heavily landscaped with stonewall entrance. Proposed as 22 feet in width. Vegetation is to continue through to Osgood Mill. Landscape to separate Modicon/Osgood Mill. Mr. Simons commented on his concerns of tearing house down to put a road through it. Less optimistic on the buffering. He questioned the distance from the existing drive. Mr. Kaminski told him it was 150' from High Street bend. Mr. Nardella asked how many parking spaces there would be. The answer was 450 parking spaces now. No. 2. 100' feet from existing access through parking lot Mr. Nardella had questions on the lighting. He wanted it shining downcast, not offensive to the neighbors. Mr. Richard Kaminski wanted everyone to understand where the existing right-of-way was as per original Osgood Mill decision thus the traffic would come out to High Street simply a question of where. ' Mr. Mahoney stated that the existing right-of-way currently impinged upon. He questioned why Modicon does not want to use the approved "proposed right-of-way,,. Mr. Kaminski stated that it did not make sense from a safety point of view to mix residential and industrial uses. Mr. Mahoney asked what happened to Sutton Street. Why is there are problem with a mix of residential and industrial? Guy Tammi, 109 High Street, stated that there was a problem with noise in the early morning. He believed that the access to the Mill Condos would go out to Sutton Street. Attorney George Rand, Attorney with Marden office, stated that there were legal concerns: New public hearing needed Use of residential lot as a driveway is not allowed Mr. Rowen stated that this was an emotional issue, wants to understand the concerns. There will be a high volume of traffic onto High Street, the question is where. Mr. Calvin Tardiff, 202 High Street, spoke on the extra cars coming into parking lot with Modicon addition, too much traffic on High Street already. Ms. Janet Sheehan, 113 High Street, questioned the proposal and asked who would own the property. Mr. Kaminski told her Brickstone would own the parcel with an easement granted to Osgood Mill. The developer of Osgood Mill would maintain the driveway and the landscaping. Mr. Paul Hedstrom, Attorney, stated that the condo association would maintain the driveway and landscaping. Mr. Hedstrom stated that the Osgood Mill developer would support the Sutton Street connector. At the present time the Osgood Mill has two access points - Main Street and High Street. Mr. Nardella asked Mr. Perna to address Sutton Street connector. Mr. Perna stated that the Sutton Street connector has been in the works for 10 years, working with Laidlaw to try to get land, environmental issues have arisen, D.P.W. continues to pursue this option. $100,000 was available to work to Sutton Street connector. Town has approved road if land donated, cannot take by emminent domain. Could go to Town Meeting to have Town appropriate the money to take by eminent domain. Mary Windle, 118 High Street, expressed concerns about traffic issues with the children on High Street. Ms. Ann Apkarian, 154-B High Street, was present to give input as to which option/proposal there would be. Lydia Rice, 138 High Street, stated that she was looking to Sutton Street in the future for the access. Proposal 2 would be preferable because then Brickstone and the Mill would be motivated to'work to Sutton Street connector. An unidentified person commented on two proposals. Proposal 1 would generate 100% traffic to the neighborhood. Proposal 2 would generate 50% traffic to the neighborhood. Ms. Phyllis Zimmerman, 105 High Street, had questions about Sutton Street. Mr. Perna stated that there were three plans for Sutton Street. Sutton Street to Route 125 Sutton Street to High Street Sutton Street to Brickstone with a cul-de-sac, never to connect with Mill Condos A second traffic study may be required. Mr. Perna asked what traffic safety controls would be put in place. Mr. Kaminski stated that there could be a blinking yellow light or possibly a stop light. Mr. Perna stated that D.P.W. would make a determination as to what would be appropriate. Mr. Leonard Enaire, 14 Prescott Street, stated that there were problems with the parking garage lights at Modicon. John Collins, 177 High Street, stated that the existing exit from Modicon should be used. Why should High Street neighbors suffer for problems Brickstone/Modicon have with their trucks. Carrie Tatlock, 138 High street, stated that she would rather have condo complex empty. She questioned the access from Main Street and wanted to know why only one way from Main Street. Mr. Hedstrom stated that the Osgood Mill has had easement out to High Street for many years, and that the key question was as to where the traffic would exit on High Street. Gail Canan, 150 High Street, stated that residents were being patronized as to Sutton Street connector. She would like to see the minutes of the Sutton Street connector public hearing. Ms Nelson stated answered in response to the Sutton Street connector questions that the Community Development Office was funded by a grant. Brickstone acquired the property, traffic studies looked into and public hearing was held. Gail Carian, High Street wants Sutton Street connector and will work towards it. She wanted a road sign, "no left turn", at existing driveway from Modicon so that it will reduce the amount of traffic. She wanted access to and from Main Street for the Osgood Mill complex. Mr. Rand stated that all options should be reviewed again. He stated that the Board would be in violation if no public hearing was held. Manuel F. Arista, 65 Prospect Street, wanted to know where Prescott Street was on the map. He wanted to see the whole site/area. He further stated that there was heavy traffic currently. Ms. Zimmerman, High Street, asked when was traffic study done and was a new one needed. Neighbors want to work to get to Sutton Street connector. Planning Staff to work out a strategy for helping neighbors to get Sutton Street connector through. Public Rearings Woodland Estates - Special Permit - Common Driveway Mr. Mahoney read legal notice to open the public hearing. Peter Ogan, Hayes Engineering, spoke to the Board on the common driveway. With the proximity to the wetlands, it makes two driveways infeasible. On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted to close the public hearing. On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Draper the Board voted to approve the special permit as proposed. Discussion Woodland Estates - Endorse Plans The Board signed the plans for Woodland Estates. Coventry Estates II,- Definitive Subdivision Modification John Willis, attorney, spoke to the Board. Drainage issues have been reviewed and approved of by the Conservation Commission. Mr. Nardella asked about granite curbing. The answer was on the 8% slopes granite curbing will be used, with Cape Cod berm being used on the rest. The pavement will be removed at the end of the temporary cul-de- sac. The slope of the roadway would protect existing driveways from runoff. An abutter would like to see granite curbing throughout the new cul-de-sac. Mr. Willis requested a waiver of construction of roadway width to driveway width for access to Lot 64. He spoke on the existing roadway. Parallel driveways would be created in the right-of-way and would be greater than 10 ft. apart. Frontage on the right-of- way was discussed. Nine acres would be deeded to the Town as conservation land. Judy Epstein stated that she always knew roadway would cross driveway. She would prefer no road and would agree to move driveway. Mr. Simons asked how many fewer lots. The answer was two fewer. A neighbor wanted to know why the street would be regraded. The answer was by removing the cul-de-sac and building consistent with existing grade, it is safer and this would eliminate need for 6 ft. fill. Mr. Leach asked where will construction equipment be stored. Mr. Quinn stated that he would clear site first and then store equipment there. Mr. Bill Grant, had questions about what will be done with his property to fix construction that he has landscaped. The answer was it will be loamed and seeded. Howard Morin, Blue Ridge Road, stated that water pressure problems need to be addressed. On a motion by Mr. Draper, seconded by Mr. Rowen the Board voted to close the public hearing and take the matter under advisement. Hickory Hill Phase II - Subdivision Modification Mr. Mahoney read a letter from Bill Hmurciak, D.P.W. The following items were part of that letter: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. allow grade >6% Waive granite with Cape Cod berm Dead end street length is okay Shoulders less that 8 ft. Waive sidewalks - $5,400 to sidewalk fund PVC drain to remain Mr. Nardella asked why not require granite curbing on >6% grade. Mr. Perna stated that Cape Cod berm was placed throughout entire roadway in Phase I and Phase II. Mr. Nardella asked that a performance bond be set at $5,000. Mr. Simons stated that he would prefer a 22' street, straight road. May be safer as narrow. Sidewalks not warranted due to topography and site layout. On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Mahoney the Board voted to close the public hearing and take the matter under advisement. Bake 'N' JoY - Bite Plan Review A letter was submitted to the Board by the neighbors. A letter was also submitted to the Board by Neve Associates. Mr. Simons questioned the elimination of 100' of trees. Mr. James Bourgeois stated that 200' of trees will remain between limit of construction and Route 114. Mr. Draper asked what the berm would be made of. Mr. Bourgeois stated that it would be an earth berm with woodboard fence on top. Additional parking not required. There will be 65 spaces utilized and 75 space provided. Mr. Perna asked if any new people will be hired as part of the expansion. Mr. Ogan, Bake 'N' Joy, stated that there would be no new people hired. Mr. Draper asked if there would be any additional expansion. Mr. Bourgeois stated that there may be additions but no plans at the present time. Mr. Ogan talked with the morning manager to get the morning schedule. 4:45 a.m. 6 people arrive - gate unlocked doors opened 5:00 - 5:15 trucks leave - trucks do not back up in the morning. Trucks come back from routes between 1:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.. They pull into the yard and back into building in the afternoon and turned off for the night. Trucks are loaded in the morning. Dry product is loaded onto the trucks at night until 9:00 to 10:00 p.m. Neighbors want to make sure these changes are permanent. Mr. Mahoney asked what were the plans for the berm. Mr. Bourgeois asked that the Board approve conditionally with restrictions on hours of operations and when addition is constructed, either keep hours of operations restricted or build berm. Mr. Peter Schwin, 13 Kathleen Drive, stated that there was still some noise. Mr. Nardella asked if there was any way further to mitigate the noise. Mr. Bourgeois answer was "no". Neighbors concerned that there will not be a permanent physical barrier - enforceability problems. It would not be practicable to build berm if not required because it would eliminate trees. Neighbors would like a sound barrier to address early morning issues. On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Rowen, the Board voted to close the public hearing and take the matter under advisement. First Methodist Church - site Plan Revie~ Ms. Bradley reviewed issues from last meeting with Board. Additional trees to be added along Route 114 as shown on plans submitted tonight. The following information was submitted: 350 parishioners 100-125 every Sunday 86 parking spaces now maximum number of spaces shown on plans for future 110 spaces will be constructed On a motion by Mr. Mahoney, seconded by Mr. Simons the Board voted to close the public hearing and take the matter under advisement. 232 Sutton Street - Site Plan Review Modificatio- Easement document submitted to Planning Board staff for Counsel's review. Twenty four parking spaces shown on plan. Possible use of residence for lab work in future. Town Need to review the number of spaces for proposed use of residence. There will be green space along Charles Street. Staff to look at the following: What re-notice is needed? New public hearing - site plan review for construction of parking lot - 75 spaces Mr. Simons questioned the need to rehear this plan. A new legal notice for adjacent site is needed. By a consensus of the Board, the public hearing is continued. Dec~ Booth Street - Reopen Discussion Ms. Bradley gave an overview of her discussions with Town Counsel as to time frame within which decision required to be made. Town Counsel's advice is that Board has until 6/8/93 to file decision with Town Clerk.. Ralph Joyce, attorney, submitted letter to Board from Camuso Attorney - $15,000 offer for easement. There has been no response from the owner of Lot 39 Blueberry Hill. Alternative presented. proposed. Language to be added to decision as Proposals to assess tie in fee for sewer and water for down street users. $12,000 for either or both water and/or sewer for next 3 lots to tie in. Revert to town after 3 lots, town to maintain, built to town standards. The sewer is located on private property. Mr. Perna stated that past representation was that sewer and water would not cost anything to later people wanting to tie in. Sewer and water will be granted to town after 3 lots tie in. Vote to incorporate is in needed. On a motion by Mr. Perna, seconded by Mr. Rowen the Board voted to approve, subject to Town Counsel's approval and D.P.W.'s approval. Mr. Mahoney and Mr. Simons abstained. Staff to continue to work with Attorney Joyce in reaching an agreement. Decisions First Methodist Church - ~ite Plan Review Discussion of amendments to draft conditional approval: Applicant to construct 110 parking spaces with future parking shown on the plans for remaining number of spaces. A bond of $5,000 will be established by the applicant and placed in an escrow account with the Town. On a motion by Mr. Perna, seconded by Mr. Draper, the Board voted to approve the decision as amended. Decision Hickor~ Hill D.P.W. - street trees will not be in the right-of-way. A $5,000 performance bond will be set up. List of waivers to be added to the decision. On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Simons, the Board voted to approve the decision as amended. &uthor~zat~on of S~qnature~ Mr. Draper signed the form. Bru~n H~11 - Sidewalk Fun~ Mr. Perna would rather have the money put in a fund to construct sidewalks in other parts of town. Mr. Nardella wanted sidewalks in the subdivision. Mr. Simons wants sidewalks on through roads. Staff to look into the number of lots of future expansion and the topography. Coventry Estates II - Lot Releas~ The Board signed a Lot Release for the following lots: 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, and 42 on Lancaster Road. A $40,000 Performance Secured by a Lenders Agreement was posted by the applicant. Ho11¥ Ridae - Bond Release A letter from Bill Hmurciak, D.P.W. was received recommending that the Board retain $10,000 to ensure the continued operation and maintenance of the Holly Ridge sewage pumping station. It was the consensus of the Board to release all but $10,000 from the bond on Holly Ridge/Deerfield Definitive Subdivision. Enfield Street - Bond Releas~ A letter was received from Bill Hmurciak, D.P.W., recommending the release of all but $600 for repair as may be required. It was the consensus of the Board to release all but $600 from the bond being held for Enfield Street. On a motion by Mr. Rowen, seconded by Mr. Simons, the Board voted to accept the minutes of May 18, 1993 as amended. The meeting adjourned at approximately 11:30 p.m. ~ Richard Nardella, Chairman