Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutConsultant Review - 323 DALE STREET 5/9/1984 U COLANTONIOZ ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS February 19, 1996 Ms. Kathleen Colwell Town of North Andover 146 Main Street North Andover,MA 01845 RIF: Engineering Review Lot 1 Dale Street Special Permit Dear Ms. Colwell: As requested, Coler & Colantonio, Inc. has reviewed the submittal prepared by Merrimack Engineering Services. The Application is not dated, however the plans are dated April 12, 1995. It is our understanding that the purpose of this review is to evaluate the Application for conformance with the requirements of the Watershed Protection District as they relate to a Special Permit Application for a lot created prior to 1994. It is our further understanding that the Bylaws dated"Final 10/13/94"are the governing regulations. We offer the following comments: 1. The parcel lies within the Watershed Protection District. The site is a 43,874 square foot parcel of land on the southeasterly side of Dale Street. Wetlands flank both sides of the site. 2. The proposed limit of work is within 37.5 feet of wetlands along the west side of the site and 43 feet on the easterly side. The Bylaw requires a setback of 100 feet as a non-disturbance zone. 3. The limits of the "Non-Disturbance" zone are not indicated on the plan as required in the Bylaw. The entire locus lies within the"Non-Discharge"zone. 4. A report addressing the impact of site development on water quality in Lake Cochichewick was prepared by Normandeau Associates. If the Board is not familiar with the qualifications of Normandeau Associates a statement of their qualifications to perform this type of work should be provided. The analysis presented appears reasonable for the individual site except as noted below. The Planning Board should also consider the incremental degradation of water quality in the lake due to other similar projects. We question the assumption that only 3700 square feet of the site will be landscaped area. The plan indicates a zone of approximately 10 to 15 feet around the building and driveway as the limit of work. This will be difficult to enforce after construction and provides very limited construction work space. It is likely that a future homeowner would wish to expand the yard area on the lot. A restriction on the deed limiting the developed portion of the lot to the area stated should be required as part of any approval. 101 Accord Park Drive, Suite One 617-982-5400 Norwell. MA 02061-1685 Fax: 617-982-5490 5. The elevation of the cellar floor in the proposed building is below the elevation of wetland areas on site. It is likely that groundwater will be encountered in the excavation for the cellar and will be a problem relative to infiltration of groundwater into the cellar. Typically, this would be controlled through the use of a sump pump. The regulations require that designs recharge runoff to the extent feasible, if a sump pump is used this would have the effect of pumping groundwater to a surface discharge point. We recommend that a test pit be excavated and observed by a certified soil evaluator to estimate the maximum seasonal high groundwater table. The proposed cellar floor elevation should be a minimum of one foot above this elevation. 6. The plans indicate a grass swale which would collect runoff along the easterly side of the building for discharge across the driveway to Dale Street. It also appears that a small depression on the easterly side of the proposed driveway, in the Dale Street layout would be created. We do nor recununend creating a trap for water in ahe layout of a public street. The proposed swale would discharge to an existing ditch along Dale Street. The regulations require that site runoff from impervious areas be recharged to the extent feasible. The proposed Swale does not address this requirement. Based on the report by Normandeau Associates, soils on the site should be suitable for on-site recharge. 7. It does not appear possible to grade to the limits shown on the plan along the westerly side of the driveway in the vicinity of the proposed 196 and existing 198 contours. We appreciate the opportunity to assist the Planning Board on this project and hope that this information is sufficient for your needs. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, COLER& COLANTONIO,INC. C ` John C. Chessia, P.E. xc Merrimack Engineering Services