Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMEMO IN SUPPORT OF APPLICTN FOR SPEC PERMIT Memorandum in Support of Application For Special Permit of Victor L. Hatern,Trustee of the October Lane Trust This lot was created in 1985 as part of the Coventry subdivision. A preliminary subdivision plan was filed in May, 1985. The definitive subdivision plan was approved by the Planning Board on December 16, 1985. The Planning Board endorsed the plan on March 24, 1986. The property was subject of litigation with the North Andover Conservation Commission which began in May, 1991. The litigation concluded in Essex Superior Court in May, 1995. The Conservation Commission's appeal of a Superseding Order of Conditions issued by the Department of Environmental Protection(DEP) is pending,but the issue is expected to be resolved along the same terms as that of the Superior Court litigation. The lot is subject to the provisions of the zoning bylaw in effect when the preliminary � .. subdivision plan was submitted. The eight-year zoning freeze provided by MGL c. 40A s. 6, and MGL cA l s. 81 Q, is extended by the period of any litigation involving the right to develop the property. The lot complies with the Zoning Regulations in that it has greater than 43,560 ft2 of lot area and 150 feet of street frontage and the proposed house has setbacks of greater than 30 e feet on all sides. No Floor Area Ration nor Lot Coverage Maximum limits apply to this lot. The t .. M p lot is in an"R-2"Residential Zone. Under the zoning bylaw in effect in 1984,no construction is to take place within one hundred(100) feet horizontally from the edge of tributaries of Lake Cochichewick except by special permit. The applicant believes that the current plan meets the conditions for a special permit listed in Section 10.3 1, par. 1, Items a. through e., of the 1984 bylaw. Specifically,the single- family home proposed for the site is; a. An appropriate location for the residential use proposed; b. Will not adversely affect the neighborhood; c. Will not be a nuisance or serious hazard to vehicles or pedestrians. Further, d. Adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the proper operation of the proposed use, viz., the dwelling will be connected to town water and sewer; and e. The proposed single-family dwelling is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the bylaw. Enclosed with this application is a Water Quality and Quantity Evaluation report from William R. Arcieri, Senior Water Quality Scientist ofNormandeau Associates. He concludes in the report that there will not be "...any adverse effect on the water quality of Lake Cochichewick as a result of the finished project." The primary water quality concerns associated with this project relate to nutrients, particularly phosphorus and nitrogen,potenLially contributed from various sources. Mr. Arcieri's report contains a detailed explanation of how each of these added nutrients will be handled. In addition, the Town of North Andover had John C. Chessia,P.E. review this plan and commented that Mr. Arcieri's "...analysis presented appear reasonable for the individual site, except as noted below." The applicant will accept as conditions of approval all terms suggested by Mr. Chessia in his letter,which is attached for the convenience of the Board. Specifically,the Applicant will engage a Soil Evaluator to do a soil test to determine the suitability of the soils to allow recharge to occur, and to establish the seasonal high water table. Further, the Applicant is willing to have his engineer prepare a leaching chamber design which will allow the storm water to recharge into the ground after it is collected from the gutters on the house. Please advise me in writing by fax [(978) 682-17121 as soon as possible if the Board wishes this information prior to its meeting on January 5, 1999. Further,under the North Andover Conservation Commission's Order of Conditions, soil erosion measures, including the required hay bale/silt fence barrier should be more than adequate, given the reduced amount of disturbed area. An earlier application to the Planning Board for a special permit contemplated a house with a footprint, seventy(70) feet wide by thirty-four(34) feet deep. The house was oriented across the lot, reaching toward each of the wetlands. The current proposal--which has been approved by the Conservation Commission--is for a structure with far less impact. It calls for a footprint only thirty-two (32) feet wide by fifty-nine (59) feet deep. Other lots in Coventry have obtained special permits for the construction of single family homes within one hundred(100) feet of a lake tributary. [See special permits granted for Lots 2A and Lot 3A] Moreover, at least twenty-six (26) special permits for construction of single family dwellings wAhin 100 feet of a tributary of Lake Cochichewick or a wetland in the Watershed Protection District have been granted by the Planning Board from 1982 to the present,many substantially closer to the lake or a major tributary. HAG2080\Principle Points.doc Normandeau Associates NORMANDEAUAS- )CIATES 25 Nashua Road Bedford, NH 03110-5500 (603)472-5191 (603)4 72-7052(Fax) July 20, 1995 Atty. Peter Hatem. 127 Turnpike Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: Lake Cochichewick Watershed Protection District; Proposed Lot Development at Lot #1, Dale Street Water Quanity and Quality Evaluation Dear Atty. Hatem, This letter report represents a Water Quality and Quantity Evaluation associated with the above-referenced project consistent with the Special Permit requirements for proposed developments within the Town's Watershed Protection District. The purpose of this Evaluation was to assess whether the proposed project would have a significant negative effect on the water quality of Lake Cochichewick. In performing this evaluation, Normandeau Associates reviewed the proposed site plan(dated April 12, 1995) , conducted a site visit, reviewed the Order of Conditions prepared by the North Andover Conservation Commission(NACC) as well as the revised Watershed Protection Bylaw(Oct. 24, 1994) and the Lake Cochichewick Watershed Plan(IEP, 1987) . The proposed project consists of constructing a residential dwelling on a one acre lot located on Dale Street which is in the upper headwaters of the Batell's Brook subwatershed. The site is about 1.3 miles from Lake Cochichewick as the stream flows. Runoff generated within the property drains into bordering vegetated wetland along the eastern and western edges of the property which outlet into a large wetland area on the other side of Dale Street and then eventually into Batell 's Brook. Soils onsite in the upland areas have been mapped as part of the Canton-Charlton complex which are described as a well-drained soils with relatively low runoff potential (SCS, 1981) . The backside or southerly edge of the property essentially coincides with the major drainage divide between the Lake Cochichewick and the Fish River watersheds. The Batell 's Brook subwatershed consists of 368 acres which make up 13 . 4 percent of the total watershed to the Lake (IEP. 1987) . At the time the Watershed Plan was developed, the principal land uses within the subwatershed consist of forested, residential, and pasture areas which comprise roughly 47, 26 and 14 percent of the subwatershed area, respectively. Without accounting for any additional residential development that occurred in recent years, the proposed project, using the entire lot area, would add about 1. 0 percent to the total residential area within the subwatershed. Corporatefflortheast RMC Environmental Services Southeast and California Bedford, NH Middleboro, MA Spring City, PA New Elienton, SC Hampton, NH Peekskill, NY Drumore, PA Greenville, SC Yarmouth, ME Lakewood, NJ Brattleboro, VT Richmond, CA A division of Thermo Process Systems Inc.,a Thermo Electron company �9 NORMANDEAU ASSJCIATE page 2 As shown on the site plan, only about 15 percent of the lot area or 6, 500 sf will be disturbed to accomodate the structure footprint(1, 613 sf) , paved driveway(1, 200 sf) and associated grading. The house will be connected to the municipal sewer system through a new force main that will be installed along the north side of the Dale Street right of way and will tie into the existing sewer main several hundred feet east of the site. The primary water quality concerns associated with this project relate to the added nutrients, particularly phosphorus and nitrogen, potentially contributed from various sources. Phosphorus is of concern because of its effect on the eutrophication process in the Lake. Nitrogen, in the form of nitrate-nitrogen, can be of concern if drinking water contains levels above 10 mg/1. Since a septic system is not required with this home development, one principal source of nutrients has been eliminated. The remaining sources relate to the potential nutrient contributions from lawn fertilizer and soil erosion. Based on water quality sampling results presented in the Watershed Plan, the annual phosphorus inputs from the Batell's Brook watershed is estimated to be 103 pounds(lbs) or about 8 percent of the total load to the Lake. Based on literature values, contributions from residential areas are expected to range between 0. 31 and 0. 54 lbs/acre(IEP, 1987) . Using an average loading rate of 0.4 lbs/ac/yr, the phosphorus load from this site would amount to about 0.4 percent of the total phosphorous contribution from the Batell's Brook watershed and 0. 03 percent for the entire Lake watershed. Given the minimal site disturbance, discussed above, and the lack of septic system inputs, loading from this particular site would be expected to be considerably lower and would have negligible impact on the Lake particularly with respect to the existing residential areas within the watershed. With respect to nitrogen, the point of concern is not so much the lake but at the property boundary where groundwater recharged onsite may enter a well used by an adjacent landowner. The NACC Order of Conditions requires that only low nitrogen content fertilizer(i. e. , generally considered to be less than 20 %) can be used. The nitrogen content in commercially-available lawn fertilizers generally ranges between 5 and 35 percent depending on the manufacturer and type of material. As an example, the SCOTTS TM Turf Builder generally contains 32 percent nitrogen with a prescribed application rate of about 16 pounds per 5000 sf of lawn twice a year (Spring and Fall) . NORMANDEAU ASSOCIATES page 3 For purposes of estimating a worst-case, nitrate-nitrogen concentration at the property boundary on a average annual basis, it was assumed that fertilizer with 35% nitrogen content was applied four times a year at 16 lbs per 5000 sf. (As discussed earlier, given the site plan layout only about 3700 sf would be available for lawn area after discounting for the driveway and building area) . This translates into a total application of 22 .4 lbs of N per year. Most of the applied nitrogen would be utilized by the vegetation or bound up in the soil. Previous studies have documented minimal nitrogen losses to groundwater from turfgrass fertilizer applications(Starr and DeRoo, 1981; Morton et al. , 1988) . A study conducted at the University of Rhode Island found that only 13% of the applied N was lost to the groundwater at an application rate of 28.5 lbs/ac/yr and under overwatering conditons(Morton et al. , 1988) . Again, to provide a conservative analysis, 50 percent or 11.2 lbs of the applied N is assumed to enter the groundwater. To determine an appropriate dilution volume, it was assumed that 50 percent of the annual precipitation(i.e. , 43 . 0 inches) evaporates or is transpired by vegetation, leaving 21.5 inches to infiltrate into the groundwater or travel as runoff. The soil in this area has been mapped as the Canton-Charlton complex, which consists of well drained soil with relatively low runoff potential (SCS, 1981) . At a minimum, about 50 percent or 10.75 inches of the available water would be expected to infiltrate into the groundwater. Additional recharge from watering is not included. As a result, given the assumed loss of applied N and the estimated groundwater recharge onsite, an average annual nitrate-N concentration at the property boundary is estimated to be 4 . 6 mg/1. This concentration based on worst-case assumptions is well below the drinking water standard of 10 mg/1. In reality, with a low nitrogen content fertilizer, as required, a normal application rate of twice a year and a realistic assumption of plant uptake, the nitrogen concentrations in groundwater are likely to be a fraction of the above value that is based on conservative assumptions. In summary, given the size of the proposed development, its location within the watershed, the minimal amount of lot disturbance as presented on the site plan and the results of the nutrient loading analyses discussed above, I would not anticipate any adverse effect on the water quality of Lake Cochichewick as a result of the proposed project. With respect to soil erosion measures, I find that the proposed hay bale/silt fence barrier should be more than adequate given the amount of disturbed area proposed, provided the barrier is installed properly and maintained until vegetation is re-established. NORMANDEU ASSOCIATES page 4 REFERENCES IEP, Inc. 1987. Lake Cochichewick Watershed Plan. Final Report. North Andover, Massachusetts. Morton, T.G. , A.J. Gold, W.M Sullivan. 1988. Influence of Overwatering and Fertilization on Nitrogen Losses from Home Lawns. Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol. 17 , No. l. Starr, J.L. and H.C. DeRoo. 1981. The Fate of Nitrogen Fertilizer Apllied to Turfgrass. Crop Science, Vol. 21. U. S. Soil Conservation Service. 1981. Soil Survey of Essex County, Massachusetts, Northern Part. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, NORMANDEAU ASSOCIATES William R. Arcieri Senior Water Quality Scientist cc: Steve Stapinski, Merrimack Engineering COLER & U COLANTONIOZ ENGINEERS ANO SCIENTISTS February 19, 1996 Ms. Kathleen Colwell Town of North Andover 146 Main Street North Andover,MA 01845 RF.: Engineering Review Lot I Dale Street Special Permit Dear Ms. Colwell: As requested, Coler & Colantonio, Inc. has reviewed the submittal prepared by Merrimack Engineering Services. The Application is not dated,however the plans are dated April 12, 1995. It is our understanding that the purpose of this review is to evaluate the Application for conformance with the requirements of the Watershed Protection District as they relate to a Special Permit Application for a lot created prior to 1994. It is our further understanding that the Bylaws dated"Final 10/13/94"are the governing regulations. We offer the following comments: 1. The parcel lies within the Watershed Protection District. The site is a 43,874 square foot parcel of land on the southeasterly side of Dale Street. Wetlands flank both sides of the site. 2. The proposed limit of work is within 37.5 feet of wetlands along the west side of the site and 43 feet on the easterly side. The Bylaw requires a setback of 100 feet as a non-disturbance zone. 3. The limits of the "Non-Disturbance" zone are not indicated on the plan as required in the Bylaw. The entire locus lies within the"Non-Discharge"zone. 4. A report addressing the impact of site development on water quality in Lake Cochichewick was prepared by Normandeau Associates. If the Board is not familiar with the qualifications of Normandeau. Associates a statement of their qualifications to perform this type of work should be provided. The analysis presented appears reasonable for the individual site except as noted below. The Planning Board should also consider the incremental degradation of water quality in the lake due to other similar projects. We question the assumption that only 3700 square feet of the site will be landscaped area. The plan indicates a zone of approximately 10 to 15 feet around the building and driveway as the limit of work. This will be difficult to enforce after construction and provides very limited construction work space. It is likely that a future homeowner would wish to expand the yard area on the lot. A restriction on the deed limiting the developed portion of the lot to the area stated should be required as part of any approval. 101 Accord Park Drive, Suite One 617-982-5400 Norwell, MA 02061-1685 Fax: 617-982-5490 5. The elevation of the cellar floor in the proposed building is below the elevation of wetland areas on site. it is likely that groundwater will be encountered in the excavation for the cellar and will be a problem relative to infiltration of groundwater into the cellar. Typically, this would be controlled through the use of a sump pump. The regulations require that designs recharge runoff to the extent feasible, if a sump pump is used this would have the effect of pumping groundwater to a surface discharge point. We re,pornmend that a test pit be excavated and observed by a certified soil evaluator to estimate the maximum seasonal high groundwater table. The proposed cellar floor elevation should be a minimum of one foot above this elevation. 6. The plans indicate a grass swale which would collect runoff along the easterly side of the building for discharge across the driveway to Dale Street. It also appears that a small depression on the easterly side of the proposed driveway, in the Dale Street layout would be created. We do not. recommend creating a trap for water in zhe layout of a public street. The proposed swale would discharge to an existing ditch along Dale Street. The regulations require that site runoff from impervious areas be recharged to the extent feasible. The proposed swale does not address this requirement. Based on the report by Normandeau Associates, soils on the site should be suitable for on-site recharge. 7. It does not appear possible to grade to the limits shown on the plan along the westerly side of the driveway in the vicinity of the proposed 196 and existing 198 contours. We appreciate the opportunity to assist the Planning Board on this project and hope that this information is sufficient for your needs. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, COLER&COLANTONIO, INC. C' )John C. Chessia,P.E. Xc Merrimack Engineering Services