The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutConsultant Review - 326 GREAT POND ROAD 5/18/1999 COLER & U COLANTONIOZ ENGINEERS ANO SCIENTISTS May 18, 1998 r &RD Heidi Griffin MAY 199899 9 Planning Board MAY C 9 Town Hall Annex NOR-Q1 lli,7OVER PLANqW,PERAftVANIT 27 Charles Street PLANNING DEPARTMENT North Andover,MA 01945 RE. Engineering Review 326 Great Pond Road Special Permit for Watershed District Dear Ms. Griffin: In response to your request, Coler & Colantonio, Inc., has reviewed the requirements under the Zoning Bylaws relative to the Watershed District Special Permit for the above referenced project. The plan has been reviewed for conformance under these submittal requirements and standard engineering practice. The submittal package included the following information: Plan Entitled: e "Plan of Land in North Andover, Mass" one sheet dated April 19, 1999. Prepared by Scott and Frank Giles. Received May 12, 1999. Reports Entitled: Letter of Submittal and Project Summary, Dated April 17, 1999. Prepared by Scott and Frank Giles. Received May 12, 1999. We offer the following comments: Zoning Bylaw: 1. 4.136.)3.)b.)Pool discharge and patio runoff is proposed within the non-discharge zone. 2. Section 4.136)3.)c.)The construction of a fence is proposed within the no- disturbance zone. 101 Accord Park Drive 781-982-5400 Norwell, MA 02061.1685 Fax: 781-982-5490 3. Section 4.136)4.) 0 ii.) 2.) it is unclear if the Conservation Commission has confirmed the wetland limits. 4. Section 4.136)4) g.)Test pits for the proposed site development were not included. These should be done to determine where high groundwater will be encountered when constructing the pool. Additional Com-ments', $. it is unclear how runoff will be directed and controlled. 6. It is unclear where the proposed 6"P.V.C. sewer will discharge. 7. The method of erosion control should be indicated and explained, S. A RDA or NOI may be required for the construction of the fence within the 100' wetland buffer. We appreciate the opportunity to assist the Planning Board on this project and hope that this information is sufficient for your needs, if you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us_ Very truly yours, CoLER &COLANTONIO,INC. , , _ 4� Jason Loiselle XC: Scott&Frank Giles Jim Rand,DPW L"'OLER & _j U COLANTONIOZ ENC;ING5A9 AND SCIGNTISTr. May 18, 1998 Heidi Griffin Planning Board Town Hall Annex 27 Charles Street North Andover,MA 01845 RE: Supplemental Engineering Review 326 Great Pond Road Special Pen-nit for Watershed District Dear Ms. Griffin: In response to your request, Coler & Colantonio, Inc., has reviewed the requirements under the Zoning Bylaws relative to the Watershed District Special Permit for the above referenced project. The plan has been reviewed for conformance under these submittal requirements and standard engineering practice. The submittal package included the following information: Reports Entitled: e Letter of Submittal and supporting documentation. Dated May 20, 1999. Prepared by Scott and Frank Giles. Received May 24, 1999. We offer the following comments: Zoning Bylaw: 1, 4.136.)3.)b.)Pool discharge and patio runoff is proposed within the non-discharge buffer zone. Reportedly, the proposed pool filtration method does not require the discharge of any wastewater. Patio runoff will not be captured and controlled, however this should not have a significant impact. Satisfactorily addressed. 2. Section 4.136) 3.)c.)The construction of a fence is proposed within the no- disturbance zone. 77ze Planning Board.should review this issue. Satisfactorily addressed 3. Section 4.136)4.)c.)ii.)2.)It is unclear if the Conservation Commission has confirmed the wetland limits. 101 Accord Park Drive 781-982-5400 Norwell, MA 02061-1685 Fax: 781-982-5490 Reportedly, Richelle Martin has reviewed this project and determined that the project does not require a Conservation Commission filing and does not fall within the 100' BVW buffer zone. Satisfactorily addressed. 4. Section 4.136)4.) g)Test pits for the proposed site development were not included. These should be done to detennine where high groundwater will be encountered when constructing the pool. Reportedly, it was concluded at the May 18'h Planning Board Meeting, that rest pits would not be required in advance of the initial excavation. Satisfactorily addressed. Additional Comments: 5. It is unclear how runoff will be directed and controlled. Please refer to comment#1. Satisfactorily addressed. 6. It is unclear where the proposed 6"P.V.C. sewer will discharge. Reportedly the proposed 6" PVC sewer pipe will discharge into the existing sanitary sewer house connection. Satisfactorily addressed. 7. The method of erosion control should be indicated and explained. Reportedly, the pool construction company will install haybales and a silt fence at the limit of work. Satisfactorily addressed. 8. A RDA or NOI maybe required for the construction of the fence within the 100' wetland buffer. Please refer to comment#2, Satisfactorily addressed, We appreciate the opportunity to assist the Planning Board on this project and hope that this information is sufficient for your needs. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, COLER&COLANTONIO,INC. Jason Loiselle XC: Scott&Frank Giles Jim Rand,DPW Reportedly, Richelle Martin has reviewed this project and determined that the project does not require a Conservation Commission filing and does not fall within the 100, BVW buffer zone. Satisfactorily addressed, 4. Section 4.136)4.)g.)Test pits for the proposed site development were not included. These should be done to determine where high groundwater will be encountered when constructing the pool. Reportedly, it was concluded at the May le Planning Board Meeting, that rest pits would not be required in advance of the initial excavation. Satisfactorily addressed. Additional Comments. 5, It is unclear how runoff will be directed and controlled. Please refer to comment#1. Satisfactorily addressed 6. It is unclear where the proposed 6"P.V.C. sewer will discharge. Reportedly the proposed 6"PVC sewer pipe will discharge into the existing sanitary sewer house connection. Satisfactorily addressed. 7. The method of erosion control should be indicated and explained. Reportedly, the pool construction company will install haybales and a silt fence at the limit of work. Satisfactorily addressed 8, A RDA or NOI may be required for the construction of the fence within the 100' wetland buffer. Please refer to comment#2. Satisfactorily addressed We appreciate the opportunity to assist the Planning Board on this project and hope that this information is sufficient for your needs. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, CO &90LANTONIO, INC. Jason Loiselle XC: Scott&Frank Giles Jim Rand,DPW ,40RTH Town of o r Andover 41 OF TICE OF EVELOPMENT AND SERVICES 0 COMMUNITY D 27 Charles Street North Andover,Massachusetts 01845 "SACHUS WILLIAM I SCOTT Director Fax (978)688-9542 (978)688-9531 MEMORANDUM TO: North Andover Planning Board FROM: Heidi Griffin,Town Planne RE: 326 Great Pond Road-Watershed Special P'ermi't DATE: May 10,1999 d raised deck in the non-discharge zone of The applicant proposes a pool,patio deck an the Watershed District. The total square footage of this project is approximately 5,500 square feet. 250' non-disturbance zone. ri wommaThe proposed fence is within the the on-discharge zone and is the fence be placed closer towards the pool so that it is in further from the lake. The plan does not contain any erosion control during the construction of the pool, patio deck and raised deck. At a a nim��aybales ha fence should be installed around the perimeter of the cstruine. I ve-not yet received an engineering review regarding this proposal. the criteria required and n En rth l ,The plan as proposed meets t - nts the Towgineer has regarding the however, I would like to see what comments proposed 6" p.v.c. pipe in the non-discharge zone. It is my understanding the pipe proposed bathroom in the ppa0 l P use, however the plan will be utilized for sewer to a p .should show the connection to the connecting pipe on Gt nd Road. I would also ask that the applicant to agree not to utilize any lawn care/garden product as prohibited in Section 4.1363B(iii) 2&3. BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BLIILDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535 Sent By: West Environmental, Inc. ; 603 579 6232; Apr-20-99 10:46AM; Page 2/2 NW�S'T Z�_e �4 d i ( 1 i i aNc. F April 20, 1999 i� Mark A. MacLennan 326 Great Pond Road RECEIVED North Andover, MA 01845 i 326 Great Pond Road,North Andover APR 0 1999 NORTH ANDOVER i SUBJECT,. Proposed Inground Fool PLANNING DEPARTMENT Dear Mr. MacT.ennan' i At the request of Scott L. Giles, Land Surveyor,West Environmental,Inc, (WEI) conducted an inspection of the above referenced site. The proposed pool was roughly z laid out and in an existing hard area,and the area northwest of the pool was sloping upland forest down to Lake Cochichewick. A previously approved wetland boundary i southwest of the pool area is slightly over 100 feet away at its closest point, 'There is an existing house with a yard between the proposed pool and the existing wetland. r =I WEI reviewed the Plata of Land prepared by Scott Giles, Surveyor, dated 4/19/99. This plan shows a previously delineated wetland boundary prepared by others. The proposed pool location is in a flat to bowl shaped area. The land slopes south towards the existing wetland. The proposed construction of the pool will have no significant detrimental impact on Lake Cochichewick provided that proper erosion control be utilized during construction of the pool,patio, pool house,sewer pipe and fence. This completes our work at this time and we hope it meets your needs. Please call Y our office if you have further questions. ,a Sincerely, r West Environmental,Inc. i, 1 "J Mark C. West, CWS President/Wetland Scientist ' ;4 Cc. Scott Giles, Surveyor i i 's 46 Stevens Mill Road, Nottingham, NH 03290 603-679-8212 4 Fax 603-670-8232 %. f4:� COLER & 10U COLANTON I EN(31t,,jGGRS ANC) SCIENTISTS May 18, 1998 P'E, ED MAY 1999 Heidi Cyriffin my C 1999 Planning Board NORTH -,mr)(VER Town Hall Annex 27 Charles Street PLANNING DEPARTMENT North Andover,MA 01845 RE: Engineering Review 326 Great pond Road Special permit for Watershed District Dear Ms. Griffin: IT, response to your request, Coler &e olantoniaqunder the Zoning Bylaws relative to Watershed District Special permit for the above referenced project. The plan has been reviewedf o neirequirements and standard enpneering practi . The submittal package included the following information: plan Entitled: "Plan of Land in North Andover, Mass" one sheet dated April 19, 1999, prepared by Scott and Frank Giles. Received May 12, 1999, Reports Entitled: Letter of Submittal and Project Summary, Dated April 17, 1999. Prepared by Scott and Frank Giles. Received May 12, 1999. We offer the following comments: 1. 4.136,)3.)b.)Pool discharge and patio runoff is proposed within the non-discharge zone. 2. Section 4.136)3.) c.)The construction of a fence is proposed within the no- disturbance zone. 101 Accord Park Drive 781-982-5400 Norwell, MA 02061-1685 Fax: 781-982-5490 3. Section 4,136)4.) c.)ii.) 2.) It is unclear if the Conservation Commission has confirmed the wetland limits_ 4. Section 4.136)4.) g.)Test pits for the proposed site development were not included. These should be done to determine where high groundwater will be encountered when constructing the pool. Additional Comments: 5- It is unclear how runoff will be directed and controlled. 6. It is unclear where the proposed 6" P.V,C. sewer will discharge. 7. The method of erosion control should be indicated and explained. 8. ARDA or NOI may be required for the construction of the fence within the 100' wetland buffer. We appreciate the opportunity to assist the Planning Board on this project and hope that this information is sufficient for your needs. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us_ Very truly yours, COLER &COLANTONIO, INC. Jason Loiselle XC: Scott&Frank Giles Jim Rand,DPW �y M / | Frmrn' Willis, Gene ' VVedn�oday, May 2009 9:11 | Sent: ^ ' ' ' To' Mary Subject: RE: bond nelaone for 32O Great Pond Road | If they just put Up8n addition and d;\dnY change driveways Or runoff tV the street, | have Do comment @sd � doesn't effect nRy 'Uhsd\citOD. � �| From: 1ppoUo, Mary � / Sent: Wednesday, �Mav27, 2OO98:3SAM � To: Willis, Gene | Subject: RE: bond release for 3Z6 Great Pond Road Not sure what you mean, if they didn't tie into streets? � Mary ----- Original Message----- From: Willis,Gene Sent: Friday,May 22, 2009 4:15 FM To' ip Subject: RE: bond release for 326 Great Pond Road | O[)N7 IF THEY DIDN'T TIE INTO STREETS Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 4:02 PIVI To: Willett, Tim; Willis, Gene Subject: bond release for 326 Great Pond Road zone. This ia�xevvaterehadspecial.permU\n10A0tocone�ucta000' mon house and decking vv�h� non-discharge . oUcont L�tm� kno��youhaveony�ouoo ��mrkW1acL�nnonvvmot�aap. � . Best personal regards, MoryZppo|ito, Planning Department Osgood Landing Town of North Andover 1SOO Osgood Street Bldg. 20' -Suite 2-30. Planning Department North Andover, W1AD184S PQ78-G8B-S535 FQ78-088-A542 mippo|ibo@tnwnofnodhandovar.nonn ippolik, From: Willett, Tim Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 200910:20 AM /m: |ppmno' Koery Subject: RE: bond release for 320 Great Pond Road | have noissues. -----Original Message----- From: Ippo|ito, Mary Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 4:02 PM � To: Willett,Tim; Willis, Gene Subject: bond release for 326 Great Pond Road This is for a watershed special permit in 1999 to construct a pool, pool house and decking within non-discharge zone. Mark MacLennan was the applicant. Let me know if you have any issues. Best personal regards, - Mary Zppn|ifu, Planning Department � Osgood Landing � Town of North Andover 1ODD Osgood Street � Bldg. 20. -Suite 2-30' Planning Department � North Andover, MA 01845 � P978-888'Q535 F978-688'0542 � mippo|itu@b»wmofnorthandovar.com � ` � � � � � � 1 �