Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence - 180 MARBLERIDGE ROAD 10/10/2002 52 Washington Street =nze Newburyport, Massachusetts 01950 Voice : (978)462-4171 0 N E Fax : (978)499-2117 Civil/Site and Environmental Engineering Land Development and Permit Acquisition October 10, 2002 Town of North Andover Community Development& Services Planning Department 146 Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 RE: 180 Marbleridge Road, North Andover, MA Mary Ellen Fennessy McDermott Required infiltration sizing for house addition Dear Board Members: Assessing compliance under the local Special Permit requirements can proceed via many pathways. Rather than prove capacity of existing systems to absorb the increase in runoff it was decided to proposed and design a new"Infiltrator" (or equivalent competitor) subsurface stormwater trench and storage system. Such a system can be sized for the net change in site runoff volume during the 100-year, 24-hour storm event incurred by the proposed addition. This system can also be constructed simply and fairly inexpensively. I have attached a construction detail and potential layout given the proposed site plan provided to me by you. Please keep in mind that so long as the construction detail remains unchanged the only deciding factors will be the approximated rooftop inflow area to be served and the calculated number of required infiltration units. Thus, changes in layout and footprint can be made in the future without compromising these calculations so long as the approximated rooftop inflow area is not exceeded or the calculated number of required units decreased. I have included a few hundred square feet extra of approximated rooftop inflow area over that calculated by measuring the proposed addition off the site plan. This extra area should more than compensate for pavers and other impervious surfaces being proposed in the landscape about the new addition. Calculate Required Infiltration Volume Given an approximated rooftop inflow area= 1,500 square feet Given a parent hydrologic soil grouping= Group D (determined by inspection of N.R.C.S. Soils Survey of Essex County Northern Part) Given an existing Cover Curve Number(CN) = 80 (Lawn, or Open Space, good condition) (See attached copy of Table 2-2a from the N.R.C.S. TR55 manual for soil group D) Given a proposed Cover Curve Number(CN) = 98 (Impervious areas) (See attached copy of Table 2-2a from the N.R.C.S. TR55 manual for soil group D) 10/10/02 Project CLP0205 Page 2 Using attached Table 2-1 from N.R.C.S. TR55 calculate existing runoff depth for 100-year 24-hour rainfall of 6.5 inches= 4.23 inches Using attached Table 2-1 from N.R.C.S. TR55 calculate proposed runoff depth for 100-year 24-hour rainfall of 6.5 inches = 6.26 inches Calculate the increased runoff depth resulting site development: 6.26 inches- 4.23 inches= 2.03 inches Calculate the increased runoff volume resulting from site development: (1,400 square feet)(2.03 inches)/(12 inches/foot) = 254 cubic feet Thus, to meet the 100-year rainfall requirement 254 cubic feet of storage must be provided in proposed trench. Calculate Provided Storage Volume Given a trench cross-section of 3.00 feet wide, 2.00 feet high and utilizing 11 infiltrator units at a length of 6.25 feet each, all as detailed on the attached pages. Calculate the total system volume proposed: (3.00 feet)(2.00 feet)(11 units)(6.25 feet) = 412 cubic feet Given an infiltrator void volume of 16.3 cubic feet per unit(See attached manufacturer's sheet) Calculate the total stone volume proposed: 412 cubic feet- (11 units)(16.3 cubic feet) = 232 cubic feet Given an approximated stone void ratio (Vv/Vt) = 0.33 Calculate the total storage volume provided: (11 units)(16.3 cubic feet) + (232 cubic feet)(0.33) = 255 cubic feet Calculate the total length of trench provided: (11 units)(6.25 feet) = 69 feet Thus, as designed the proposed infiltrator trench will store the net increase in site stormwater runoff volume incurred by the proposed house addition. Given the entire above do not hesitate to contact me should you have questions or comments regarding this matter. Very truly yours, 10M A SOUCY u CIVIL K 0.39867 SYC��� L Jr, John Jr., P. :v�+ Principal Milestone• 52 Washington Street, Newburyport,MA 01950 • Civil/Site and Environmental Engineering Table 2w :--Runoff curve Ttumbors for Urbnn.arens} Cave numbers for is tiv t°des ptl hydrolog'ie mil:gia .Aver e pe ront ever cypc and hydrologic c onditi �ap� �u�: �� .:.: �� � C:..:. p Fatly dnvtoped urban arras fv-gvtatioyt eat bbMedi �RDPD: CDN�CTIb►� Open space(lawns, parks, golf coupes,cemeteries, EK1�JT11.��, CbNDiI�L�bFJ etc.)", Poor condition(grws aver.< ;5t1 x) _...,:........: : 86 Fair eTndition(mss cover 1 to 75%),........ 49...: 69 73$ Gootlwnditjon(gross cover.> 77.5%).. ........... 39 61 74 .. 1 Impel v rrrus areas: Faxed parking lotz, roofs, driveways, etc.. (exc udirg rightaaf ivy). ,.. ........ ........ 98 98 98 -98 Streets anti roads: Bared:garbs and storm se,%�6rs(excluding igkst vv'ay).. ......,,, ,.>. ,...., 9€3 98 98 Paved.Wen ditches(including rigbt-o-way) , 83 Gravel(including r ht=oi-way) , i Dirt OnehAhg tight-of way} ......... ..... . -72 822 87,.. Western desert tftn areas: Natoral desert landsimping(pervious area only)4... 63 _41 Arti#tcW desert jandscapng(impervious weed b«crier, des-Art shml7 u th I= tv 2-inch sand or gravel nwIch-and basin border), 96 96 96 . Urban distr'ieis. Corrtttterdal anA business.:................:... 85 .:: 92 94 9.5 Indwstrial...... ...... ........ 72 lfl 88 91 93 Residential districts}by average let size; 118 acre or less(town hewer ,,,. V4 Ure .30 81 80. 85 .. 1 a(re., .... :�D 5i 7�_ 134 2 Acre* -,.......: ...............,.:......... .. . r2 16 65 ii iii Deretoping urban aaas Newly graded are: (pervious areas only.. no .. . . ... . Idly:land*(CWs arre deterrty'.d_ wing cover types situ to those in tabled :.. 'Av a runufTei-ditioii;ar lx > : . ... .... .... _...... ..._.._.............. ::... . . .._... . 2I'he tavern per ne impvc c ions area shown aK used ker develop the tern . yCe GN .ether 3 tlrttptluna are fulleiSr�; itu»r iu 2 am tllrecsly#.*ww4,wd to the dminop tiy"etn,ImpervIO is a elill hav*a�. 1; .a is#'p ry ad ass itr .winsidored etiuh aloft:t .a n :;paeo in Roo hvf3r+ale ndicion l�' for alter'i o, binst r t:c ndtt ra iii of _d ustiig r , d'a xhc»n ate eiitnt tti°tit of stare t' utate "7' 2te t�tiiSp4L `l`rir vt er'eamhtrit3tcu +f tri apue gwt tyica _ 4COFn Ate CN`:c for oaturgi de.�i•t land-leaping y pa y. pttcg hrid be cumpaitod nog li 2-3 ar:,�#based itc�1#iiyititi arm pare : #E' 1 9di anti the Wn iotw um- Gil.The pervious area t"`N#.are ax�ittrted,s al it nt to desert#h''�ili in pow- �rlreil jmlitiw 4c9miwite Cut's to we ror the de-Agn sxf temporary y mc:iKtai4s dsirin �. �ti . �_ ; �tvt3 strcact#iiri�auSilif#�e i' tl�iitrel iisles�, Cgtti�:.t zcr�.A h3��a1 on this dear of develupwot timperviowt 4trea petuntage)and the CN s for the twwly Xraded pervious aiea$. texture is givers in appendix A for determining. the Hydrologic condition HSO classification for disturbed soils. ydrolo*:rendition Wicates the Weems of cover typl..� twat pt on ix3:tiltration and runoff and is Cover type generally estimated from density of plant and residue cover on rnple areas. Good hydrologic condition Fable 2,1 W&e must cover tees, sueh as indicates'that.the soil usually has a low runoff vegetation, bare soil, and Impervious surfaces. There potential for that-speate hydrologic sail group, cover are a number of methods for determ Ming cover taw- tgvpes d tr ."MeAi SDrft6 factors to eonoder in The raost conunon are field reconnaissance, aerial e ti in °thre'.kffect..of cover owinfiltration.and photographs, and land use maps. runoff at6(6)canoppy or density of laves, crops,car other vegetative areas;(b)anxount of year-round cover; (c)<"ount of gibs or close-seeded legumes in Treatment rota ons;°(d)percent of residue cover; and (e)degree of surface roughness. rrewm_erd is a coiner type modifier(used only in table 24b)to describe the management of cultivated C t -C\()o = �.2� I K1 agricultural lands. It includes roecha!p cal p>raetic , such as contouring and terracing,and mana, ment ►�CZc��T�D oS� practuces, such as crap rotatiom and reduced or no -TIbW = (p. p:1f4mvs, tillage, Fable 2-1.-Runoff depth for:selected CN's and ira atall wnountes T Ituriol dcpfh for curve liainfiail 40 46 50 80 55 .. �:.::: 7fl re .......:.......90 95 ......»,.�_...»........�,�.... »3333 .»..».,,.. .--'.. 1.0 0,00 O.Oo Q, } 0.400 0.00 4).€7+0 �4� 003 A08: 0.17 0.32 Q..5C) €).i9 . . _...: _a_ $ L2 ,00 .€0 W:- _00 R03....:_:�:;,�}7..:._. ......,.15 2 f �4._. . .99 1:4 .00 .00 ,00 . -,00 .1� _ 3 : : .61 ��� 1.),8 1.6 .00 4Q 60 3 3 3 3. :( : 4I 4 ..... .. .34 62 .'76 1.11:: 1 . ....... 2.0 .00 17t7 QO'33 3 3 V 14 4 y3$: 5 .89 1:09 ° .08 X43 146:3 . .. _f+ii€ �' 1.18 1.53 2.5 411} 00 17 1•I) ....._ 3.0 _0O .02 .19 .33 :6.1 ,i 1 <' .96 1, 1.59 .1.98 446. ,tom : .35 A .75 1 f11 1130 1x63 2.02 2A5 + 8� 3. 4.0 ,06 .18 03 : .:: :.59 .76 1,(l� i, _:::_�;67. 2.04 2.46 :2.92 . 1- 4-3. .:.. 3.7, 4,5 14 ). 74,._ 1,0� 1. 1:67 2 � 2.91 340 �. 426 5,0 ,44 .69 ,98 1.30 1,F'w... ._.....� ,.46............z� SZ7 a:$$.. .. 4_422.. . ...-4.%.. 6.Q .50 130 1:14 L52 1.92 U5- 2.81 328 3.7$ 4.34 4.83 5A1 5.76- TO :94 124 1 ....2.1�... ..�� ���........:...� ....-.':.4.15 4.69 53x*` i 5.82 (W: 6,7 8-0 uz 1.74 2s 2.78 8-U 3.89 4 f; 5' ... ..6:21 .._ 0.87.-..:: UO 7.76 9.0 1.71 2,29 2M 8,49 4.10 4.72 15,33 :::_ 5.9& 6-57 7.18 7.79 t3,4O 8.76 10.0 2M 189 3.56 423 4.90 & 622. .:.:.6.$$. _33 33.`1352 8.16 838 9.14 9.76 11.0 2.78 3.52 4.26 5,00 6.72 6.48 7.1$:.. :.-.7.81 8.48 9.13 9.77 10.39 10.76 .4) 3.38 4.19 5,11i) 6.719 6.56 7. 8 ij5:.:.:.. 8+743 9345 10.11 10.76 11.39 11,76 119 4.00 4.89 5.76 f,4;1 7.42 8 2 :::..:,....8:98 ....::O 71 .. 1t 42 11.10 . 11.76 12.119 12.76 1=1,4 4.65 6,62 6.55 7.44 8.30 9.12 9M 10.M 11.39 12.08 12.7 1510 6.33 6.333 6336 7.36 8.29 9.19 1x.94 10,85 11.63 12.37 13.47 13.74 14:39 14: '1ntesgra3at the vu sbown w olaWn r�rsuff�lu�th3 for N 3 or rainfsitl a iaanta tsar sltuwn (210='VI-TR-55, Seemd Eel., June 19N) V � :f _ LA a H � I � 146 '-` c*? � CO 1 r � � C) w 41 cd II J L / b OFD: O� Ar o OS ' t _ / t C N �k Z t ►" � b � t h / t / O � W larc-hionda uc.nw$V41t1IC'39 .t2�C. Engincerin;and Plannilia consultants November 16, 1993 Ms. Kathleen Colwell Town Planner 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 0184 Re: Modification of Special Permit Lot B-1 14arbleridge Road Dear Katheen: On behalf of my client, Flintlock Inc., I am requesting that the driveway providing access to the dwelling on lot B -1 be allowed to be paved. During the public hearings, we had submitted evidence that using pavement instead of gravel in the driveway construction would not have an effect on the quantity or quality of runoff from the site, Based on this evidence, it is our opinion that such a change would be considered a minor and consistent with the design concepts of the original proposal, The implement of pavement would not require any specific modification of any other part of the design, Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Michael J. Ra u Project Manager . 62 lrontvale Avenue . Suite I stone6111,31A 02180 (617)438-,)'121 Fax(617)438-9654 Flintlock Inc. P.O. 8®X 531 NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 November 2, 1993 Kathleen Colwell, Town Planner Town of North Andover 120 Main Street North Andover, MA 01345 Re: Lot B-1 Marbleridge Road Dear Mrs. Colwell: According to the condition of the special permit on Lot B-1 Marbleridge Road, we have determined that the water table at the house location is at 40 inches below existing grade. If you have any questions, please contact me at 688-6558. Thank you. Sincerely, David A. Kindred President