HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-08-20Au~ 2o, 1979
Regular Meet~-g
The PiANNINO BOARD held a regular monthly meeting on Monday evening, August 20,
1979 at 7:30 P.M. in the Town Office Meeting Room. The following members were present
and voting: William Chepulis, Chairman; Job~ J. Monteiro, Vice-Chairman; Micluael P.
Robert s.
PLANS NOT RE~IRING APPROVAL:
1 - GEORGE FARR Granville Lane: plan dated july 1979, revised July 7, 1979 (previously
Fredericks planl; access easement was removed. It was noted that the railroad easement
is not shown; lots A & B o~ plan with access easement from Granville Lane to lot A;
lot B does not have frontage on Salem St. Motion made by Mr. Roberts to endorse the
plan as not requiring approval under subdivision control law with %he provision that the
railroad easemant b~ shown on said plan as well as erasure of line showing part of the
access easement from Granville Lane. Monteiro seconded and the vote was unaaimous.
Signature will be affixed subject to corrections being made.
(Secretary's note; it was subsequently determined that the line shown is a lot line for
lot 25 and that there is no existing railroad easement, therefore the plans were signed.)
2 - ~IC NITZC~E, Salem St.: owner is Rob~. Steer; plan dated Aug. 9, 1979; purpose is
a land swap between-Steer and Nitzche and there is no change in the frontage. Motion
by Nenieiro to endorse said plan as not requirimg~approval under subdivision control law.
Roberts secouded and the vote was unanimous.
3 - ~IDLE PATH REALTY TRUST, Lot 24A and 25A, Bridle Path: per Richard Jones this is
for future c~nveyanoe lmmrposes only. The forms were not time ste~nped by the Town Clerk.
Plan d~ted Aug. 15, 1979 on which Lot P~.A is so noted on said plan as not being a
buildable lot. Mr. Chepulis asked tb~t %he old lot line between the two lots be shown
on the plan. Dave Zaloga actually owns the land and is selling to Jones. Charlotte
Vier is trustee of Bridle Path Realty Trust. Jones to take plan back and correct for
Sept. 10, 1979 meeting.
4 - ROBERT REGAN, Willow St.: Bob Regan stated that ~hey have acquired the 45 acres
previously owned by Mark Henry and prior approval was given in 1973. Desire approval
now for Lot 01; Lot C has frontage on Turnpike St.; easement shown is only a partial
one; they will appear at nex~t Planning Board meeting with a preliminary subdivision
plan. Ba~ State Anesthesia would like to looa~e on Lot C1. It was e~la/ned to the
Industrial Finance Committee last week that the Iway it is set up if LOt C was purchased
and a subdivision was approved then the frontage lot would still belong to Regan. Felt
this will bring some industry into N. A. Plan dated Aug. 20, 1979 for Willow Industrial
Park. At our own expense, said Regan, we are runni~ a force main up Hillside Rd. to
tie in to what is existing and has a/ready submitted road plans to Cyr for his approval.
Chepulis asked why they didn't come in with the subdivision and eliminate all these
problems - Regan: Lo~ D ~11 remain the same, timing is a factor because Ba~ State
Anesthesia wamt to get under construction within 2 or 3 weeks and they can't acquire
the land until i~ is a legal
is just $o get back into the 40 acres. Chel~alis then pointed out that there already is
a Lot C on record, this one should probably be called C2. Mr. Gelinas brought out the
fact that it is a confus~,g issue with the IDFC because of the bond procedure and the
advent of a subdivision. Chepulis offered a solution including Lot I~ but Regan stated
tB~t Lot D is sold. He a/so did not care for an open ended easement as shown on the
plan. If it is ex~ended, you are providing access to Lots C & C1 ,he said, and if you
make a ro~d the Town has no control over it because the easement has already been
deeded out. Regan said that Willow Industrial Park will own the easement. Mr. Cyr
August 20, 1979 - cont.
felt that they should su~!t the subdivision plan; we have a policy on paper streets;
the intent is there for a subd/vision, it is not a case where an individual waats to
build one house on Willow ~t. Chepulis asked where access to Lots C & Cq would be -
Andy ~rasso sa/d, right off Willow S~. for Cq.
Motion was made by ~Ir. Monteiro to endorse the plan of land as not requiring approval
under subdivision control law subject to the Chairman being authorized to sign when the
changes on the lineal dimension are made. The Chair did not accept the motion. Then
Mr. Monteiro m~de a motion to have him come back in later but withdraw without prejudice
now. Again, no second. Mr. Roberts then made a motion to endorse as not requiring
approval under smbdivislon control law said plan subject $o the corrections of deleting
lot line for Lo~ C and easement. Mr. Monteiro seconded and the vo~e was unanimous.
To be signed when corrections made.
qJAIL RUN - Developer, John Turtle, not present. Tabled until Sept. lO~h meeting.
RALEIGH TAV~ P~ASE II - deferred until later in the Agenda, per request of Mr. Hedstrom
who will be late.
DISOUSSI(~: PAP~ ST. DEUELOP~NT - Mr. Cyr said he is "disgusted"; the C~i~%ee ~e
up ~h a go~ wo~ing solu~i~ ~ ~hese pa~r steers, if s~e~e g~s in $0 do develo~
m~% ~ these s~e~s we~ protected. ~. Chepulis ~h~ t~ be i~ a oo~ora~i~
or ~ indi~d~l, i% is still ~ ~%i~y acco~ng ~o the law. ~ di~'~ ~ee. C~,
~n referees ~o paper s$~e$s ~ %hey ~s$ tod~ ~ ha~ no resembl~ce of a ~",
~id %~% he ~11 n~ ~ve ~ se~oes. ~ey discussed the Willow ~. si~a~ion. ~e
~ did ~0% %he T~ Clerk %~% no apples w~d ~ ~n on a list of s~ree~s.
~s~ interjected %~% we ~ve no control ~er ~il~ Pe~%s. ~e %hen r~ ~
opini~s of To~ O~sel per ~s le%%e~. ~ con--ed %~% %~s re~ires ~her
die--sion a% a Work ~ssion . ~ ~omee$ with ~d $o ~a~ letter %o To~ O~sel.
HAYMEADOW BOND A~0(IFT: H. Hyder representing. He has a copy of a le%er from the BP~
setting amount of bond at $32,200 and the original should Be sent to this ]~OARD. Asked
for approval subject to receipt of said letter. Total amount of $~52,400. Motion by
Roberts to release lots 27-30, 3~-34, 43-47, 53-56, & 38 as outlined in the Correspond-
ence per Highway Surveyor and BPW - Highway: $~20,200 and B~W $32,200. Monteiro seconded
and the vo%e was ~--nimous.
PADDOCK ESTATES DISCUSSI(N: Original completion date was Sept. 1,~978 with a $60,000
bond. Work has Been done on drainage and development ha~ cO~menoed again. Susan staSed
that the topography is not in line with approved su]xlivision plan and, therefore, a
modified plan should be requested. Plan ~ad been revised ~arch 5, 1979.
Frank ~elinas outlined changes - ~ ) dra/nage has changed in terms of the location between
l=ts 5 & 6 which was approved by the BOARD at the .time; 2) tope: this was land cour~ed
a~er approval; subsecfuent to the approval there has been some earth moved and a modified
profile will be submitted (an abutting subdivision in Andover took some of this material).
Binder will go down this fall and the finish pavement should be in the fall of q980.
New completion date set for Dec. ~, 1980. Mr. Cyr said that the dra/nage pattern will be
changed right along with the tope.
Mo~ion by Mr. RoBerts to grant an extension to Oct. q, ~979 in order to receive modified
plans within that time. Mr. Monteiro seconded and vote was unaaimouso This was mutually
agreed upon between the BOARD and Scott Follansbee, developer.
At~.s't 20~ 1979
HAz,~,IGH TAV~F~ Pt~SE II DE~ITIVE PL~L~ BECISI~: )tr. Hedstrom had not ar~ved and
hour was getting la~e so BOARD wen~ on with the dec/sion.
Li~t of conditions of approval were outlined by Mr. Monteiro. (See file). Frank Gelinas
requesrted 2~ ~he G~ir ~e~a~ ~s~a~ion on a o~ple of ~he tonalities for ol~ifi-
oati~, B~ ~z-~ted ~e~. 1) ~ere is a oontr~iction ~t~een leSSers ~ B~
~d ~re ~p~, s~pula$im loosing-~ts - recessed the B~ decide ~oh
oo~ly ~th; 2) 2he~ is only one piece ~I~d ~ ~he prope~y, the ~er of C~di-
%i~s t~t ~11 be ~i%%en ~11 effeo$ ~ly 2 or 3 l~s. Che~is stated
c~di%Xons w~ld only apply %o ~he ~ea effected. 3) Gelds asked, ~er
~ He~a%i~ is the c~ de s~ ~g %~ed do~? ~her %~ %~% s~Bo~ doesn't
~e a% %he in%erseo%i~. ~d, C~ stated plus %he o~ of ~he ro~, sho~ness.
J~ ~1o a~ed if %he 6~ is wi%h~ %he fr~ework of the e~g o~oe- yes.
~d ~ c~%~ued %~% %here is suppos~ %o ~ ~ 1~1~ off of ~
~d %~ %he l~es sh~d e~end ~cause of ~od possibili%y of re~
~ Gr~11e ~e. If the objection iff %he 6~, i% c~d Be e~neered %o 4~, said
Gel~as~ ~d ~ c1~2 is en%i~led %o ~eoific ~as~s for %~i~ %his d~.
%o1~ him per %he ~ghw~ ~eyor~s let%er ~%ed A~. 6, 1~9. CFz- ~e~d
~e~ ~ %o w~% the proBl~ is ~ s~ng %~ he did no% l~e %he desi~ of %he whole
~1 de s~ ~d w~d ~c~nd e~end~ i~ o~r ~o the a~2%i~ l~d. ~ Geli~s
s~d %~% he w~d near receive appro~ 2o go over %he ~rsh. He %hen
the ~ defer the decisi~ ~%il Sept. l~h mee%~ ~cause he w~d like ~o lo~
~%o O~s "eX%he,or" si%~%i~ %o see if he o~ ~ accel%ed ~d %o work ~%h %he
Plier ~ the fi~ ~%s. ~ %~ :%he B~ a~ed for a ? ~ ~ension of time
motion ~d ~teiro seceded to e~d t~e ~%il Sept. 17, 1979 ~d
~t ~%il ~p%. 10, ~979. U-~-~s vote.
PLANNer'S INI~NATI~: Archdiecese Project - Wo~ Rid~: No~i~ ~ M~teiro t~t
beene the ~ Wo~ ~ is ~ si~l~ ~o o~ Wo~bri~ Rd. a le~er ~ ~i~ten
~o ~he P]~-i~ ~fice s~s~g ~s ~ cb~d $o Freed~ ~e ~d notify ~hose
c~ $~ we ~ve ~ ~he ~thority ~o n~e s~e~s for ~ ye~. No see~d.
Chep~is s~d he w~d o~1 the ~ate ~d point [~t the ~r of phone~i~lly si~l~
~s. Jo~ e~la~ed She ~ason for ~s moti°n as the f~e ~t ~he ~w~ ~eyor
~ no~ been ~lowed ~o ~ter the prope~y for ~spection p~oses. ~s
~e ~le" ~d t~s ~gh% is ~ing ~en aw~ ~om ~he T~. ~s de~lopmen~
directly ~de~ned ~e ~le". He ~ded ~ he ~ders$~ $~t ~he ~r~ is not
~ ~o p~ ~ the de~lopm~ either. Chep~is ~1% %~S %he de.loper ~d c~sider
~he safe$y of ~he ~bi~s of ~he de~lopmen~ ~d %he T~. ~e isle is %he ~e~%y
of $he ~a$e law ~ ~11~ ~oh m
CO~ BLOCK GRANT: ~asan requested go-ahead to write the proposal under the guise
of the Bd. of Selectmen. BOARD agreed.
(~O(~,API~ ~ FR~ ,SAT.1C'q S~ATIE: Suea~ explained what this would entail and %hat there
is no pa~ involved. BOARD in favor.
The members signed the Special Permit Rules & Regs. To be filed with Town Clerk.
CRIT3SIA I~GRA~IN~ SPECIAL PEP~ITS IN NA~IERSHED: to be worked on a reviewed with the
Building ~A3spector and Con. Cern. John Monteiro's opinion was that these should be
br~,~ht up at a Special Meeting %o which other Boards are invited to attend.
Work Session to Discuss Amendments to ~ubdivision R & R: Wed., August 29, 1979
Aug. 20, 1979 - oon~.
Plastic LaminaSed Top for counter is okay with the BOARD,
Press Re-lease for ~rants ~s reviewed by membership and is okay to publish.
CON. COM. ORDERS C~ COI~DITIONS.. Colsia, Hillside Rd. and Lo~ 19, Ingalls Crossing
were received and on file.
LEGAL NOTICES: ANDOTER, ~AVERHILL - on file.
BOARD O~ APPEALS DECISION: C~AD~F~CE - on file.
The meeting adjourned a~ 11:30 P.M.
~lda Blankstoc3g, Secretary ,