HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-01-08 Conservation Commission Minutes C'O SERV 1,10NC;OIV1:I ISSION
NORTH ANDOVER, AIASSACITi[SF., rs o1.845
&J6 44
y f
,�rte« gP�r�arM sf,1e�
a
January � 1975
1lr..m°a°mrtec of Meeting of 'GJrar°;1,:mrca8dary, September smmber Zea, 1974,
Members Present:r Mrs. Treara°mlaly, Sero, Ki,.t fprr dge, tle.us:sa_ear s CheS:rul is;s, t,a°fcar°rei., Lewis,
Re ocaa; Asooniate rttt:mabovs Fiak, "fur ano; Absent: Mr. D'Aa°Agelo
Meeting called to order, 7:20 P.M.
1 . Wetlands Gass 22-6, Appledore. li'cirott ei'rren by Mrs. Trott) l.y on a:arr informal
meeting held by, :SNR on e eptemamber 252 1974 at 10 A.M. in Boston regarding the
ml;Sria.i..oeio rc Order of Conditions. Following ass°u anoe of DNR final a,l. Or der, aa, group of
abutters requested a hearing before SimSe1S'i pursuant to provisions listed on the ti7m'mdor .
DNR stated that the abma.°1;trurs were not "lawful iam.tm"ary anorn" and entitled to ra, hear—
ing but, that arta meeting would be arranged. At this meeting, the abutters listed their
conoern er Mr.
rombly mmr,lrcmg ve ttae C mmisaious.Pn ct"cni as sand Atty. T1�"m.tem spoke for the
(?) y e, ttatread that they m°amigbt request
the Commissioner of 1:J<.atur°ra.l Resources to suspend 1 the permit it aaaatil the outflow
ow
iarve tureesaNaro submitted and the question of Branae and control otrw,c ture, maintenance
is resolved.
Motion made by Mrs. Kittredge and seconded by Mr. Ciar,pulisa to write to Cram mi, ,I ,r°r�r°er
k Y
Brownell supporting the s:mars:simensrie'"n of the permit antil design and maintenance pro—
blems are resolved; stating concern (,,)ver r.paal:i.ty of 'ria,-ater in proposed long facrrad;
i
noting that location of Sewage Pumping metal-ion could be an rmmaclue health hazard; and,
requesting ques tin further information on the °1.magul:1rty of the aacG:i.rar°as °iPeaken Ho ['air.
The motion carried with no objection.
Motion rmacle by Salm CSrc:iaul.;.,sus and ,�eooraded by Mrs,. Kittredge to write to Conservation Law
Sa'cabrn.ai.C:mm't:i.carr, Atty. Sandra Dawson, relating facto of cane G:armd rOqUOUiDg mraa,forrm7a.t:.on as
to proper appeal. prooeduTe for various us p a.rtive; concerned, Copies to be oe~nt to SINN
and Town n Counsae 1. Notion carried d wi.th no objection.
on.
2, Capital. Budget — Request from Capital Budget Committee for information on any �
pltara'k'aa'd o apita l expenditures tur R"s for° next si ear" period. Discussion 4>Cwn,tC?red on figure
of a,asw7eaa.nt we would like to see appropriated to Conservation l twd yearly.
i
u
Motion made l:ay Mrs. Kittredge and saecaearaml.c>d 'IW Mr. Lewis to request ar, yearly appro—
priation of 1001000 to be ar1.ci:.ed to the Clcmmrse=wrwration maid. Motion oa:r,°r°iewd with no
objection.
September 25, 1974 — COW Page
3. Conservation Restriction: rnformution received from Conservation Law Foundation,
an Conservation Rectriction, Generally felt that this would be a useful tool kn
restricting development in lake area. Mrs. TranTly auggested that the Commission
requent the Improvement Society to set up a lecture on the subject, inviting other
area boards and commissions, No objections were voiced to the idea.
Motion to adjourn ronc,io by Mr. Chepulis and neconded by Mrs Kittredge. No objeotions.
Adjournment at 8:17 Hm-