HomeMy WebLinkAbout1954-12-27December 27, 1954
The me~ing was called to order by the chairman at 7:30 p.m. Members
present were Mr. Nicheeta, Mr. Finck, Mr~ Driscoll, and Mr. Broadhead.
This was a Public Hearing. In the absence of the secretary, Mr. Broadhead
was appo nted to read the notice of hearing. The subject of the hearing
was the petition of Domenic Mangano for approval of the Board for a pro-
posed ~mxm change in classification of land as advertised, from Gen. ~esi-
dential to Business.
Mr. Edwin Murphy, 134 Great Pond Road was recorded as being in favor of
this petition being approved as he felt the town needs more and more of
this type of business md felt the planning adviser would recommend such
action.
Mr. Andrew Coffin, 305 Sutto~ Street was recorded as being in favor of
the petition and stated he was also a year ago_~hen the same petition was
before the Board.
Mr. Joseph Slipp, 16 Dewey Street was recorded as in favor of such action
stating he was cae of the original owmers and feels the land in question
is not good for anything else.
Mr. John Slipskowski and Mr. Sam D~m~uro were also recorded as being in
favor of the Board approving the petition.
Atty. George Karelitz appearing on behalf of Mrs. John Griffin, Chickering
Road,. stated the Advisory Board had recommended unfavorable action on this
at the last town meeting and stated as much in their 1954 report. He als&
stated he ~elieved this was spot zoning and said type zoning is illegal.
Mr. John Osgood, 38 Osg~ed St. was recorded as being against this action
being approved stating this ~uld be spot zoning and would defeat the pur-
pose of the present survey beingundertaksnbythe planning adviser.
Mr. S.F. Rockwell was recorded as being against favorable~tion being taken
by the Board stating we should wait until Mr. Blackwell's report is presented.
He stated, however, that his firm (D & F) was notagainst such a petition being
approved but felt the Board should wait until the report is received.
Mr. A. Murray Howe, Osgood St., was recorded as against the petition for the
above mentioned reasons.
~ifter the above pros and cons had been presented, Mr. Finck made the motion,
seconded by Mr. Broadhead that the Board take this matter un~er advisement.
This was unanimously agreed to by theBoard.
An application was received from Mr. C. Marino stating his request that the
Board tenatively approve a subdivision on Woodstock Avenue. After discussing
the matter, the Board informed Mr. Marino that a bond should be
brought in at the next meeting and said approval would be acted
upon. (This was on ad-vice of Mr. Duffy of the Public Works Dept.)
On motion of Mr. Driscoll, seconded by Mr. Broadhead, the chairman
was uananimously voted to act as agent in the purchase of new filing
equipment.
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
January 3, 1955
Sign~hairman
Clerk
Next Meeting