HomeMy WebLinkAbout1957-09-09216
Mmada~, Septem~ber 9, 1957
Regular Meeting
The meeting was called to order at 7:35 P.M. The members present were:
Nicholas F. Nioetta, Ch~man; John B. Osgood, Secreta~-y; Robert J. B~e,
Howard L. G~lm~ and James M. Bannau,
A private conference was had by the Board with Atty. Bradley amd Atty.
Stella concerning the Filetti motel court case.
Mr. Durso and Mr. Consentino presented a plan to the Board for approval
but were told to hav~ the plans marked so as to designate the proper lot and then
return them to the Board for approval.
Mr. Brasseur, Jr. presented plans to the Board for approval of lets
Hillside Road. Mr. Rober~ Herm~un also appeared in the interests of Edwer~
Greenwood, who owns adJoiming land. The Board approved the plans.
Atty. Richard Simmers of Andover presented plans to the Board for approval
of a let of land o~ ~reat Pond Road. The Board approved the plans.
The Board discussed the amendments to the By-Law that are to be put before a
public hearing. Mr. Nieetta will see Mr. Blackwell concerning the amendment about
Mrs. McQuesten's land.
There was a diseussion on ~he release of the water bond of the Sutton
O~ issued by the American S~rety Company after a letter, approving the
installation, was received from the B~ard of Pmblic Works. Mr. Bam~am mad~
motion that the Chairman be appointed to sign the fo~ms. Mr. Barke ~eeonded
the motion and it was voted unanimo~sly.
The Board looksd at a plan for Joseph Carter of Marbleridge Rd. A letter
be sent advising him that lot ~8 on Abbott St. is in Country Residence Area.
The Beard members then thoroughly discussed the petition of John F. Sawye~
to permit the change in classification of a parcel of land from Rural Residence
and Country Residence to General Business. Mr. Burke made a motion that the
petition of John F. Sawyer for reclassification be approved. Mr. Gilms~ seconded
the motion and it was voted unanimously.
The Board feels that by approval of this petitien~ the tow~ will benefit
due to the increase in valuation of this property. The Petitioner informed the
Board that the proposed ~ection Of a Garden Center would entail an expenditure
of betweeu $200~0OO and ~D ~vu~.
In making this decision, the Board took under co~'ideratic~ that there
already exists opposite this location on Turnpike Street a large area of land
zoned for business. ~Jso, on the southwesterly side of the By-Pass opposite
this location there is a gasol~ue service station and a concrete products Company.
This lam~ is sdso zoned for business. '
The Board feels that the a?proval of this petitie~ will not change the
character of this area. Lu addition~ no opposition was registered agafnst the
proposed Garden Center at the Hearing.
September 9~ 1~57 -
A le%%e~ ~as received f/om %he B~a~d of Health app~o~inE lo%a 1 - ~ on
~he prope~ of Vincen%
5~. Eicetta read the notices of the Hearings of the Board of Appeals.
~r. Gilman made a motion to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Mr. Barman
and voted unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:3,5 P.M.
217