HomeMy WebLinkAbout1969-11-10November 10, 1969 - cont.
CLARK STRET ACCEPTANCE:
A request was received from the Sele}tmen for the investigation and report
of Clark Street for acceptance. The matter was referred to the Subdivision Control
Committee. Letters will be sent to the Highway Surveyor.
PARKHURST - Lacy Street:
Plans not requiring Planning Board approval were submitted to the Board for
signature. There was a question as to the legality of the description and the
forms were returned to the applicant for more clarifying statements.
INITIAL HOUSING ELEMENT:
The report on the Initial Housing Element as made by the League of Women
Voters was received. The Board discussed the report and noted certain errors and
incompleteness. A letter of thanks will be sent to the League of'Women Voters for
their assistance.
RALEIGH TAVERN ESTATES:
Mr. Osgood was present relative to the bond request of $16,000 as recommended
previously.
The meeting adjourned at 10:OO P.M.
(William'Chepulis, Jr.)
Clerk
(Anna Donahue)
Monday - December l, 1969
Regular MeetS_ug
The PLANNING BOARD held their regular meeting on Monday evening, December l,
1969 at 7:30 P.M. in the Town Office Building with the following members present
and voting: Robert J. Burke, Acting Chairman$ George B. Farley, Charles W. Trombly,
Jr. and Donald N. Keirstead.
FERNCROFT CIRCLE, Lot 20:
Atty. John Wi/lis was present and a discussion was held about a hearing to be
held by the Board of Appeals relative to lot 20, Ferncroft Circle. He feels the
lot only has 52 feet frontage because the roadway is not going to compleDed. The
Board feels that this is an approved lot on an approved roadway in an approved
subdivision. The Build~ng Inspector has ruled that he would issue a building
permit if an application was filed with him. Mr. Keirstead made a motion to send
a letter to the Board of Appeals that it is the opinion of the PlanningBoard, and
also Town Counsel, that lot 20 is suitable for building in every respect. The lot
has adequate frontage and no Board of Appeals action is required. Mr. Farley
seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous.