Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous - Exception (578)O 1.1 0 % ��S vie �Dt � heed w VV 7S w F5 aims -4k 1 �tV Ff Town of North Andover NORTH Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals o? °''` "y° Community Development and Services Division x= 27 Charles Street R. , �.9 p�AATEp 'pP�tG North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 SSACHuSE D. Robert Nicetta Building Commissioner FAX TRANSMISSION TO: FROM: Town of North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals 27 Charles Street North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 FAX: 978-688-9542 PHONE: 978-688-9541 DATE: q ` �1- D SUBJECT: /0'- D 06 a, PM )a, NUMBER OF PAGES: REMARKS: Telephone (978) 688-9541 Fax(978)688-9542 Board of Appeals 688-9541 Building 688-9545 Conservation 688-9530 Health 688-9540 Planning 688-9535 Town of North Andover Office of the Conservation Department Community Development and Services Division 27 Charles Street Julie Parrino North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 Conservation Administrator MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9, 2002 TO: North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Julie Parrino, Conservation Administrator SUBJECT: Engineering Review for the Meadows, 40B Project Telephone (978) 688-9530 Fax (978) 688-9542 On behalf of the North Andover Conservation Commission, I would like to request that the Zoning Board of Appeals consider using the consulting services of Lisa Eggleston, P.E., for the engineering review of the Meadows Project. Ms. Eggleston has consistently been providing review services for the Conservation Commission over the last year. Ms. Eggleston has approximately 20 years of engineering experience and a copy of her resume is attached for your review. The applicant has recently submitted a Notice of Intent filing with the Conservation Commission. Outside engineering review is necessary to determine if the drainage design complies with the DEP Stormwater Management Guidelines. A joint engineering review for both Boards may help to simplify and expedite the hearing process. p E;' OIFE' SES9 - 200 BOARD OF APPEALS BOARD OF APPEALS 688-9541 BUILDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535 EGGLESTON ENVIRONMENTAL LISA A EGGLESTON, P.E. EDUCATION: M.S. Civil Engineering, University of New Hampshire, 1981 BA, Biology, Smith College, 1979 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER (Massachusetts and Maine) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Lisa Eggleston is an independent environmental engineering consultant with 19 years of professional experience; her work has focused on issues related to water quality and wastewater engineering, environmental permitting, stormwater management, and environmental impact analyses. Ms. Eggleston has co-authored several papers on stormwater and CSO impacts and lectured on water quality issues for a number of professional organizations. ■ Interceptor Metering Program, Boston Water and Sewer Commission. Played a key role as part of a project team conducting an intensive three-year flow metering program in the City's interceptor sewers, in an effort to understand how the system functions and where capacity problems exist. Primary responsibilities included development of a flow metering plan, implementation of a data management system, ongoing analysis of the data, and preparation of monthly and final reports. ■ NPDES Stormwater Monitoring Program, Boston Water & Sewer Commission. Providing technical support to Rizzo Associates in the conduct of an ongoing five-year stormwater monitoring program for BWSC in accordance with Phase I NPDES permit requirements. Responsibilities include sampling program design, assistance in site selection, data evaluation and preparation of technical memoranda. ■ North Coastal Watershed NPDES Phase II Stormwater Permit Compliance, Massachusetts DEP. Participated with VHB, Inc. to provide assistance to 15 North Coastal communities with their Phase II stormwater planning. Included conduct of initial workshops providing an overview of the Phase II program and regulations, assisting the towns in assessing existing practices and data needs, and providing guidance in the development of their stormwater management plans, including measurable goals and a realistic concept for implementation over the initial 5 -year .Phase II permit term. ■ Residential and Commercial Area Stormwater Monitoring Projects, Boston Water and Sewer Commission. Provided technical assistance on the planning, implementation, and evaluation of two year-long stormwater monitoring programs aimed at characterizing separated storm drainage from representative residential and commercial areas of the city. Responsible for technical oversight of the flow metering and water quality sampling programs, data evaluation, and preparation of project reports. ■ North Andover Wetlands Regulations, North Andover Conservation Commission. Revised the stormwater management section of the Town of North Andover's wetland regulations to provide consistency with the 1997 DEP Stormwater Management Standards. Continue to provide review of projects before the Commission with respect to stormwater management. LISA A EGGLESTON, P.E. ■ Cooling Water Discharge Evaluation, UMass Boston. Conducted an evaluation of a once - through cooling water discharge to the waters of Boston Harbor, using the CORMIX model for mixing zone impacts, in support of an NPDES permit application for the facility. ■ Stormwater Sampling Program, Town of Concord, MA. Assisted the Town of Concord with the design of a water quality sampling program to assess the effectiveness of several stormwater treatment technologies. Prepared a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for the project. ■ Provincetown Municipal Airport SWPPP, Mass. Aeronautics Commission. Prepared a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the Provincetown Municipal Airport in accordance with requirements of USEPA's NPDES Phase I Multi -Sector General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity. Also prepared a Notice of Intent (NOI) for general permit coverage. ■ Phase I NPDES Stormwater Discharge Application, Boston Water and Sewer Commission. Project Manager on a two -phased permitting effort, which included GIS mapping and inspection of the approximately 12 square miles of separate storm drainage area in the city, flow monitoring and sampling of wet weather events in selected areas to characterize pollutant concentrations and loadings, and development of a Stormwater Management Plan identifying measures to minimize discharge of pollutants to receiving waters. ■ Dorchester 090 Separation Project, Boston Water and Sewer Commission. Responsible for the flow metering program and SWMM computer modeling effort conducted by Rizzo Associates, which served as the technical basis for the preliminary design of a separated storm drainage system in the 090 drainage area. Also assisted in preparation of project design report. ■ Pine Neck Creek Storm Drain Investigation, Boston Water and Sewer Commission. Project Administrator on a comprehensive investigation of a 93 -acre storm drain system to identify sources of bacteria. The investigation included an analysis of receiving water and stormwater quality data and physical inspection of the sewer and drain systems, as well as television inspection, smoke testing and dye/flooding testing, and water quality sampling. A recommended plan evaluating the data and outlining management control measures was prepared. ■ Hobbs Brook Drainage Improvement Study, Massachusetts Highway Department. Served as Technical Specialist on an investigation of the effect of deicing practices on stormwater quality and receiving waters in the Cambridge Reservoir watershed. Work included field sampling to characterize highway runoff and reservoir water quality, computer modeling of sodium transport through a complex surface and groundwater system, and evaluating options for control of sodium levels. Also evaluated controls for conventional runoff pollutants and emergency response procedures to minimize the impact of accidental spills on the highway system. ■ NPDES Part 2 Stormwater Discharge Investigations, Various Airports. Conducted evaluation of receiving water quality impacts resulting from stormwater runoff from airport deicing operations at Massport's Logan International Airport and L. G. Hanscom Airfield. Participated in a similar study for the Rhode Island Department of Transportation for T. F. Green Airport in Warwick, Rhode Island. LISA D. EGGLESTON, P.E. ■ Wastewater Disposal System, Pleasant Bay Nursing Home, Brewster MA. Designed and obtained permits for a subsurface disposal system for a 123 -bed nursing home located within a watershed protection district in Brewster, Massachusetts. ■ Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Monitoring, Boston Water and Sewer Commission. Project Manager on the design and implementation of a two-year metering and monitoring program of CSO discharges into Boston Harbor, development of a computer model to predict the frequency and volume of overflows in the system, and evaluation of receiving water impacts. The program was developed to meet the requirements of BWSC's NPDES and municipal discharge permits. ■ Westchester GMFIVMF, United States Postal Service (USPS). Prepared a Stormwater Management Plan and Best Management Practices Plan for the proposed development of a 551,000 -square -foot General Mail Facility and 20,700 -square -foot Vehicle Maintenance Facility adjacent to the Kensico Reservoir in Westchester County, New York, as part of an overall Environment Impact Evaluation. Due to the sensitivity of the receiving waters (part of the water supply for the City of New York), a stormwater retention basin/filter berm system was designed to treat runoff prior to discharge to on-site wetlands. ■ Loon Mountain EIS, Lincoln NH. Conducted water quality modeling of the East Branch of the Pemigiwasset River in conjunction with the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed expansion of the Loon Mountain Ski Area in New Hampshire. Focus of the analysis was the impact of increased wastewater treatment plant discharges on water quality in the river. ■ Design and Permitting of Private Wastewater Treatment Facilities, Various Clients. Project Manager for planning and design of five private wastewater treatment plants, including collection, treatment and disposal systems. Plants utilize RBC treatment, and range in size from 26,000 to 107,000 gallons per day (gpd). Overall responsibility for preparation of conceptual design reports, permit applications, and hydrogeologic studies; coordination with state and local officials; and preparation of final plans and specifications. ■ United Maritime Fisheries Corporation, Lynn MA. Served as technical consultant to a commercial lobster pound operation in response to a city complaint of saltwater discharge to the municipal sewer. Identified sources of discharge, evaluated overall adequacy of process water system, and developed corrective actions. Participated in district court hearings on the issue. ■ Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), Miscellaneous Projects. Prepared environmental impact reports for a number of proposed wastewater facilities and private development projects, involving determination of baseline conditions and predicted effects on marine/estuarine, aquatic, and terrestrial systems. Also coordinated work in other technical areas, including traffic issues and historical/archaeological resources. ■ Residential Site Development Projects, Various Clients. Project Manager on several residential subdivision projects in Massachusetts. The work included site engineering and design, coordination with Town Boards to obtain permits, and environmental impact reporting. ■ Water Quality and Biological Sampling Programs. Responsible for planning, implementation, and supervision of numerous water quality, demersal fish, macrobenthic, and sediment sampling LISA A EGGLESTON, P.E. programs in both estuarine and freshwater locations throughout the United States. Provided technical data for a variety of permitting activities and related environmental impact studies. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY 1997- present EGGLESTONENVIRONMENTAL, Sudbury, Massachusetts 1987 to 1997 RIZZO ASSOCIATES, INC., Natick, Massachusetts 1985 to 1987 BSC ENGINEERING, INC., Boston, Massachusetts 1981 to 1985 METCALF & EDDY, INC., Wakefield, Massachusetts 1979 to 1981 UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, Durham, New Hampshire PUBLICATIONS/PRESENTATIONS Schofield, A.M. and L.D. Eggleston. Seasonal Characterization of Stormwater Quality in an Urban Residential Area. Proceedings: Advances in Urban Wet Weather Pollution Reduction, WEF Specialty Conference, Cleveland, Ohio. June 1998. Eggleston, L.D., A. Keith and S. DePasquale. Identifying Sources of Bacterial Pollution in an Urban Storm Drainage System. Proceedings: Urban Wet Weather Pollution - Controlling Sewer Overflows and Stormwater Runoff, WEF Specialty Conference, June 1996. Eggleston, L.D., B. Sullivan, P. Keohan, and A. Omobono, Boston Water and Sewer Commission Combined Sewer Overflow Monitoring Project. Published in the Journal of the New England Water Environment Association, Vol. 27, No. 1, and Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation's 66th Annual Conference, Anaheim, California, October 1993. Recipient of the Boston Society of Civil Engineers' 1994 Herzog Award. ■ Eggleston, L. D. and L. Blank. Compliance Monitoring and Assessment of CSO's and Receiving Waters in Boston. WPCF Specialty Conference on Control of Combined Sewer Overflows. Boston, Massachusetts, April 8-11, 1990. ■ Eggleston, L. D. The Use of Private On -Site Wastewater Treatment Plants in Massachusetts. New England Real Estate Journal, December 1987. • Eggleston, L. D. Resource Management Decision Making Facilitation - -The Acushnet Estuary. Presented at the New England Estuarine Research Society 1984 Spring Meeting, Duxbury, Massachusetts. ■ Eggleston, L. D. Water Supply Diversion vs. Salt Marsh Impacts - A Case Study. Presented at the American Water Resources Association 1983 Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas. ■ New Hampshire Water Supply & Pollution Control Commission, NURP Summary Report, Durham Urban Runoff Program. SR -36, 1982 (cited as Principal Contractor). Valley Realty Development, LLC 978-470-8257 phone 978-470-2690 fax Agenda September 10, 2002 Public Hearing The Meadows Comprehensive Permit Application �IC�W SEP 11012 002 D BOARD OF APPEALS Responses to Department Memos ' School Children Fiscal Impact Analysis (revised) P.O. Box 3039, Andover, MA 01810 Glennon, Michel From: Griffin, Heidi Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 11:23 AM To: 'Ralph Willmer' Cc: Nicetta, Robert; Glennon, Michel Subject: RE: 40B project review Hi Ralph: The site eligibility letter was received in April of 2002. I'm guessing that wouldn't make a difference, but if it does can you please let me know? And yes, I think it would be advantageous if you attended the Zoning Board hearing Monday Night. It's on September 10th in the Senior Center and the meeting itself begins at 7:00 p.m. Can you please contact Bob Nicetta at 978-688-9545 for more specific info on the project and to receive any updated memos he may have that I have not seen? Thank you very much, Heidi -----Original Message ----- From: Ralph Willmer[mailto:RWillmer@McGregorLaw.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:50 PM To: 'hgriffin@townofnorthandover.com' Subject: 40B project review Hello Heidi - I am checking in to see if there is a ZBA hearing on 9/10, and if so, would you like me to be there. I have it in my calendar, so I am available. Perhaps a larger question is whether the recent decision regarding the New England Fund has had any effect on this proposal. Please let me know when you get a chance. Hope you had a good summer. Thanks. Ralph Ralph R. Willmer, AICP Environmental Planning Director McGregor & Associates 60 Temple Place, Suite 410 Boston, MA 02111 (617) 338-6464 x26 (617) 338-0737 (fax) rwillmer@mcgregorlaw.com 1 Expanded Environmental Notification Form Proposed Residential Development Project The Meadows North Andover, Massachusetts Proponent Valley Realty Development, LLC Andover, MA Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. JTraffic Engineering/Transportation Planning 280 Main Street, Suite 204 North Reading, MA 01864-1300 978-664-2205 Fax: 978-664-2444 rl LJ n tJ LJ tJ n LJ rI LJ LJ n LJ EXPANDED ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT The Meadows North Andover, Massachusetts Proponent Valley Realty Development, LLC Andover, Massachusetts August 30, 2002 Prepared by Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning 280 Main Street, Suite 204 North Reading, MA 01864-1300 978-664-2205 Fax: 978-664-2444 In association with GSD Associates Architects, Inc. GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. West Environmental, Inc. p��� 7 SEP 9 - 2002 lJ 571-ENF1 BOARD OF APPEALS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM ...................................................... 1-1 2.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT & ACCESS STUDY............................................................. 2-1 3.0 WETLAND........................................................................................................ 3-1 4.0 DRAINAGE....................................................................................................... 4-1 5.0 WASTEWATER................................................................................................ 5-1 APPENDIX i 571-ENF1 DLIST OF TABLES Page TABLE 2-1 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY .................................................... 2-4 TABLE 2-2 OBSERVED ROADWAY SPEED SUMMARY ................................................ 2-5 TABLE 2-3 VEHICLE -TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY .................................................... 2-7 TABLE 2-4 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS.. 2-9 TABLE 2-5 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL -OF -SERVICE SUMMARY........ 2-10 TABLE 2-6 SUMMARY OF STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS ........................... 2-12 a a 0 0 a a a a a a a 571-ENF1 a LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 2-1 SITE LOCATION MAP FIGURE 2-2 2002 EXISTING WEEKDAY MORNING PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 2-3 2002 EXISTING WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 2-4 2007 NO BUILD WEEKDAY MORNING PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 2-5 2007 NO BUILD WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 2-6 2007 BUILD WEEKDAY MORNING PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 2-7 2007 BUILD WEEKDAY MORNING PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 571-ENF1 w E1.0 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM (ENF) I Fl D I 11 571-ENF1 a Commonwealth of Massachusetts III N 1 N Executive Office of Environmental Affairs ® MEPA Office Environmental Notification Form The information requested on this form must be completed to begin MEPA Review in accordance with the provisions of the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR 11.00. Project Name: The Meadows Street: 2357 Turnpike Street Route. 114 Municipality: North Andover, MA Watershed: Stearns Pond Universal Tranverse Mercator Coordinates: X = 331,194; y = 4,720,950 Latitude: 420 37.47' North Lon itude: 710 3.60' West Estimated commencement date:02/03 Estimated completion date:2006 Approximate cost: $60,000,000 Status of pLoject design: 10% complete Proponent: Valley Realty Development, LLC Street: 342 North Main St., P.O. Box 3039 Munici alit : Andover State:MA Zip Code:01810 Name of Contact Person From Whom Copies of this ENF May Be Obtained: Dermot J. Kelly, PE, PTOE Firm/Agency: DJK Associates, Inc. Street: 280 Main St., Suite 204 Municipality: North Reading State: MA Zip Code: 01864 Phone: 978-664-2205 Fax: 978-664-2444 E-mail: djkinc@aol.com Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)? NYes Land [:]No Has this project been filed with MEPA before? ❑Yes (EDEA No. ) a Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before? ❑Yes (EOEA No. ) I III Is this an Expanded ENF (see 301 CMR 11.05(7)) requesting: a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(8)) ®Yes a Special Review Procedure? (see 301CMR 11.09) E]Yes a Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11) E]Yes a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) E]Yes // ►1 • Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an agency of the Commonwealth, including the agency name and the amount of funding or land area (in acres): NA Are you requesting coordinated review with any other federal, state, regional, or local agency? ❑Yes(Specify ) ®No List Local or Federal Permits and Approvals: (1) Zoning Board of Appeals MGL. Chapter 40 B for a Comprehensive Permit.. (2) North Andover Conservation Commission Order of Conditions. (3) Department of a Environmental Protection Sewer Connection Permit. (4) Massachusetts Highway Department Access Permit. (5) Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Policy Act (MEPA) Review. (6) Various local permits. Revised 10/99 Comment period is limited. For information call 617-626-1020 571-ENF1 a 1-1 Which ENF or EIR review threshold(s) does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03): ® Land ❑ Rare Species ❑ Wetlands, Waterways, & Tidelands ❑ Water ❑ Wastewater ® Transportation ❑ Energy ❑ Air ❑ Solid & Hazardous Waste ❑ ACEC ❑ Regulations ❑ Historical & Archaeological Resources Summary of Project Size Existing Change Total State Permits & & Environmental Impacts Approvals ® Order of Conditions Total site acreage 47.14* ❑ Superseding Order of New acres of land altered Conditions ❑ Chapter 91 License Acres of impervious area 0.31* 11.29* 11.60* ❑ 401 Water Quality Square feet of new bordering <5,000* sf Certification vegetated wetlands alteration ® MHD or MDC Access Permit Square feet of new other El Water Management wetland alteration <5,000* sf Act Permit Acres of new non -water ❑ New Source Approval dependent use of tidelands or NA ® DEP or MWRA waterways Sewer Connection/ . Extension Permit ® Other Permits Gross square footage 12,204 sf 171,517sf 183,721 (including Legislative Number of housing units 1 269 270 Approvals) — Specify: Maximum height (in feet) 25 ft +- 30 ft +- 55 ft +- • MGL. Chapter 40B — TRANSPORTATION Comprehensive Vehicle trips per day 10 1,504 1,514 Permit from North Andover ZBA Parking spaces 12+- 650 662 • . Various local permits Gallons/day (GPD) of water use 880 62,150 63,030 including Building (estimated) gpd Permit, Water, Sewer, Occupancy Permit, GPD water withdrawal Unknown 0 0 etc. GPD wastewater generation/ treatment (N/A) Unknown 63,000 63,030 Length of water/sewer mains None, 5,000 feet 5,000 feet (in miles) existing within within well and Route 114 Rte. 114 septic R.O.W. R.O.W. system *A 1,950 square foot section of the existing parcel of land is located in Middleton. This piece of land will be subdivided and is not part of the current proposed project. All land areas noted in this EENF are located in North Andover and are included as part of this proposed project. CONSERVATION LAND: Will the project involve the conversion of public parkland or other Article 97 public natural resources to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97? ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No 571-ENF1 1-2 e []Yes (Specify. // • Will it involve the release of any conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation restriction, or watershed preservation restriction? E ❑Yes (Specify. 11 11 m RARE SPECIES: Does the project site include Estimated Habitat of Rare Species, Vernal Pools, Priority Sites of Rare Species, or Exemplary Natural Communities? ®Yes (Specify Vernal pools ) ❑No HISTORICAL /ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Does the project site include any structure, site or district listed in the State Register of Historic Place or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? ❑Yes (Specify ) ®No If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic or archaeological resources? ❑Yes (Specify M AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: Is the project in or adjacent to an Area of Critical Environmental Concern? ❑Yes (Specify ) nNo PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project description should include (a) a description of the project site, (b) ❑ a description of both on-site and off-site alternatives and the impacts associated with each alternative, and (c) potential on-site and off-site mitigation measures for each alternative (You may attach one additional page, if necessary.) ❑ The proposed project as presently planned consists of the construction of a total of 270 residential condominium dwelling units. The proposed access to the site would consist of two curb cuts along Route 114. The North Site Drive would be located opposite Sharpner's Pond Road with the South Site ❑ Drive located approximately 300 feet further to the south. The project site is approximately 47.14 Acres in area located in North Andover, MA on the southwestern side of Route 114 at the Middleton and North Andover Town Line. A 1,950 square foot section of the ❑ existing parcel of land is located in Middleton. This piece of land will be subdivided and is not part of the current proposed project. All land areas noted in this EENF are located in North Andover and are included as part of this proposed project. The site is highly irregular in shape, there is approximately ❑ 863.35 feet of frontage along Route 114. The side boundaries abut private residential and private commercial properties and the rear of the lot the lines abut a public forest known as the Harold Parker State Forrest. The existing topography ranges in elevation from approximately 160' to 138' on the 10 Acre plateau portion of the site located off of Route 114 referred to as the "Upper Meadows" portion of a the property. The "Upper Meadows" area has been mostly developed and is used as a dog kennel. The balance of the property or approximately 37 Acres drops off steeply from the upper area to elevations of between 110' to 120' in the lower section to the rear of the property surrounded mostly by wetlands and ❑ the Harold Parker State Forrest. There is a large flat meadow area on the lower section of the property that is generally surrounded by wetlands and some forested area. Portions of the property have been filled in the past. ❑ The Proposed Development consists of two different housing types and designs located in the "Upper Meadows" and the Lower Meadows". The 10 -Acre Upper Meadows site contains 192 one- and two- bedroom garden style units located in four buildings of three- and four -stories high organized around a central formal courtyard space. This area contains both enclosed garaged parking areas and onsite ❑ parking areas. The "Lower Meadows" is located in the rear of the property and is accessed from a cul-de- sac off of Route 114. There are 78 three bedroom 2'/Z story townhouse units located in the lower meadows area. The townhouses are grouped into three -unit to 7 -unit buildings and garage structures around a common landscaped parking courtyard area with the rear yards generally facing into the undeveloped land. ❑ Off site improvements consist of extending the existing water and sewer approximately 5,000 feet from Palomino Drive southerly to the project site. Gas is proposed to be extending into the property from the south via a gas line located in Route 114 just over the town line in Middleton. Proposed off-site traffic a mitigation includes the possible widening of Sharpener's Pond Road to provide two separate approach lanes at the Route 114 intersection. 571-ENF1 0 1.3 .: LJ C. Is any part of the project site currently or proposed to be in active forestry use? Yes X No; if yes, please describe current and proposed forestry activities and indicate whether any part of the site is the subject of a DEM -approved forest management plan: D. Does any part of the project involve conversion of land held for natural resources purposes in accordance with Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97? _ Yes X No; if yes, describe: n E. Is any part of the project site currently subject to a conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation restriction or watershed preservation restriction? _ Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the release or modification of such restriction? _ Yes _ No; if n yes, describe: F. Does the project require approval of a new urban redevelopment project or a fundamental change in an existing urban redevelopment project under M.G.L.c.121A? _ Yes X No; if yes, describe: n G. Does the project require approval of a new urban renewal plan or a major modification of an existing urban renewal plan under M.G.L.c.121 B? _Yes X No ; if yes, describe: n H. Describe the project's stormwater impacts and, if applicable, measures that the project will take to comply with the standards found in DEP's Stormwater Management Policy: Since the proposed development scheme creates approximately 11.29 acres of new impervious area, post n development peak discharge rates will be higher than pre -development peak discharge rates. In addition, it has been decided not to recharge stormwater on the site due the `J existence and uncertain nature of the previously placed demolition debris fill materials. Thus, the site drainage design will employ measures to limit infiltration. Mitigation of stormwater impacts will be accomplished through the use of Best Management Practices L, (BMP's) in accordance with the standards found in DEP's Stormwater Management Policy. BMP's to be utilized include "Stormceptors" and Detention Basins installed in-line with the n new pipe networks prior to final discharge into the wetlands. These devices will serve to remove a minimum of 80% of stormwater generated Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and oil residue. Respective outfalls will employ the use of channel protection and energy dissipation at the discharge locations. In addition, hay bales and silt fences will be installed entirely r'1 around all construction work limits and continually maintained to reduce the potential for 571-ENF1 1-4 n L] r1 LAND SECTION — all proponents must fill out this section I. Thresholds / Permits r A. Does the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to land (see 301 CMR 11.03(1) X Yes _ No; if yes, specify each threshold: More than 10 Acres Impervious for Mandatory EIR. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in acres, the current and proposed character of the project site, as follows: Existinq Change Total Footprint of buildings 0.28 Ac 3.94 Ac 4.22 Ac r Roadways, parking, and other paved areas 0.033 Ac 7.347 Ac 7.380 Ac Other altered areas (Gravel Drives) 0.93 Ac -0.93 Ac 0.00 Ac Other altered areas (developed/filled site areas) 15.50 Ac 7.72 Ac 23.22 Ac Undeveloped areas 31.64 Ac -7.72 Ac 23.92 Ac n A 1,950 square foot section of the existing parcel of land is located in Middleton. This piece of land will be subdivided and is not part of the current proposed project. All land areas noted in this EENF are located in North Andover and are included as part of this n proposed project. L, B. Has any part of the project site been inactive agricultural use in the last three years? n Yes X No; if yes, how many acres of land in agricultural use (with agricultural soils) will be converted to nonagricultural use? C. Is any part of the project site currently or proposed to be in active forestry use? Yes X No; if yes, please describe current and proposed forestry activities and indicate whether any part of the site is the subject of a DEM -approved forest management plan: D. Does any part of the project involve conversion of land held for natural resources purposes in accordance with Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97? _ Yes X No; if yes, describe: n E. Is any part of the project site currently subject to a conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation restriction or watershed preservation restriction? _ Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the release or modification of such restriction? _ Yes _ No; if n yes, describe: F. Does the project require approval of a new urban redevelopment project or a fundamental change in an existing urban redevelopment project under M.G.L.c.121A? _ Yes X No; if yes, describe: n G. Does the project require approval of a new urban renewal plan or a major modification of an existing urban renewal plan under M.G.L.c.121 B? _Yes X No ; if yes, describe: n H. Describe the project's stormwater impacts and, if applicable, measures that the project will take to comply with the standards found in DEP's Stormwater Management Policy: Since the proposed development scheme creates approximately 11.29 acres of new impervious area, post n development peak discharge rates will be higher than pre -development peak discharge rates. In addition, it has been decided not to recharge stormwater on the site due the `J existence and uncertain nature of the previously placed demolition debris fill materials. Thus, the site drainage design will employ measures to limit infiltration. Mitigation of stormwater impacts will be accomplished through the use of Best Management Practices L, (BMP's) in accordance with the standards found in DEP's Stormwater Management Policy. BMP's to be utilized include "Stormceptors" and Detention Basins installed in-line with the n new pipe networks prior to final discharge into the wetlands. These devices will serve to remove a minimum of 80% of stormwater generated Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and oil residue. Respective outfalls will employ the use of channel protection and energy dissipation at the discharge locations. In addition, hay bales and silt fences will be installed entirely r'1 around all construction work limits and continually maintained to reduce the potential for 571-ENF1 1-4 n L] D erosion from construction activities. All hay bales and silt fencing will be "toed -in" to prevent sediment from undermining the filter fabric. Furthermore, all excavation activities will be performed in a manner to minimize erosion. I. Is the project site currently being regulated under M.G.L.c.21 E or the Massachusetts Contingency Plan? _Yes X No; if yes, what is the Release Tracking Number (RTN)? J. If the project is site is within the Chicopee or Nashua watershed, is it within the Quabbin, Ware, or Wachusett subwatershed? _ Yes X No; if yes, is the project site subject to regulation under the Watershed Protection Act? Yes No K. Describe the project's other impacts on land: Refer to the Project Description for an overview of the planned development and its impact on existing land conditions. Other potential negative impacts other are addressed via the responses provided to the questions herein the "Land" section and the accompanying "Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands" section. Positive impacts on land as a result of this project will be the containment of any contaminants potentially present in the previously placed demolition debris fill materials and restoration/beautification of the edges of existing wetland areas currently adjacent to filled areas. M. Consistency A. Identify the current municipal comprehensive land use plan and the open space plan and a describe the consistency of the project and its impacts with that plan(s): The current municipal Comprehensive Land Use Plan has zoned a portion of this property as 1-1 (Industrial -1) with the other portion zoned as R-2 (Residential -2). Neither zone allows multi -unit residential a development. However, the proposed project is being filed under the Chapter 40B Comprehensive Permit Status, which allows for the construction of multi -unit residential development projects. r r I 11 D B. Identify the current Regional Policy Plan of the applicable Regional Planning Agency and describe the consistency of the project and its impacts with that plan: Same response as noted above under Ill. Consistency A. C. Will the project require any approvals under the local zoning by-law or ordinance (i.e. text or map amendment, special permit, or variance)? _ Yes X No; if yes, describe: D. Will the project require local site plan or project impact review? X Yes _ No; if yes, describe: A permit under MGL Chapter 40 B – Comprehensive Permit is required from the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals with input from all other local boards and departments. RARE SPECIES SECTION I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to rare species or habitat (see 301 CMR 11.03(2))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to rare species or habitat? —Yes X No C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Rare Species section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project site fall within Priority or Estimated Habitat in the current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)? _ Yes — No. If yes, 1. Which rare species are known to occur within the Priority or Estimated Habitat (contact: Environmental Review, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Route 135, Westborough, MA 01581, allowing 30 days for receipt of information): 2. Have you surveyed the site for rare species? _ Yes _ No; if yes, please include the results of your survey. 571-ENF1 E 1-5 3. If your project is within Estimated Habitat, have you filed a Notice of Intent or received an Order of Conditions for this project? Yes _ No; if yes, did you send a copy of the Notice of Intent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, in accordance with the Wetlands Protection Act regulations? _ Yes _ No B. Will the project "take" an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A (see also 321 CMR 10.04)? _ Yes _ No; if yes, describe: C. Will the project alter "significant habitat" as designated by the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A (see also 321 CMR 10.30)? _ Yes No; if yes, describe: D. Describe the project's other impacts on rare species including indirect impacts (for example, stormwater runoff into a wetland known to contain rare species or lighting impacts on rare moth habitat): WETLANDS, WATERWAYS, AND TIDELANDS SECTION I. Thresholds/ Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wetlands, waterways, and tidelands (see 301 CMR 11.03(3))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits (or a local Order of Conditions) related to wetlands, waterways, or tidelands? X Yes _No; if yes, specify which permit: Order of Conditions C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Water Supply Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section below. II. Wetlands Impacts and Permits A. Describe any wetland resource areas currently existing on the project site and indicate them on the site plan: Banks, Bordering Vegetated Wetlands, Land Under Water, Isolated Land Subject to Flooding, Bordering Land Subject to Flooding, and Vernal Pools. All wetland resource areas are shown on the site plan. B. Estimate the extent and type of impact that the project will have on wetland resources, and indicate whether the impacts are temporary or permanent: Coastal Wetlands Land Under the Ocean Designated Port Areas Coastal Beaches Coastal Dunes Barrier Beaches Coastal Banks Rocky Intertidal Shores Salt Marshes Land Under Salt Ponds Land Containing Shellfish Fish Runs Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage Inland Wetlands Bank Bordering Vegetated Wetlands Land under Water Isolated Land Subject to Flooding Bordering Land Subject to Flooding Riverfront Area 571-ENF1 Area (in square feet) or Length (in linear feet) Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable 225 square feet — temporary 01 1 aC. Is any part of the project 1. a limited project? _Yes X No 2. the construction or alteration of a dam? _ Yes X No; if yes, describe: 3. fill or structure in a velocity zone or regulatory floodway? _ Yes X No 4. dredging or disposal of dredged material? _ Yes X No; if yes, describe the volume of dredged material and the proposed disposal site: 5. a discharge to Outstanding Resource Waters? —Yes X No 6. subject to a wetlands restriction order? Yes X No; if yes, identify the area (in square feet): a D. Does the project require a new or amended Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L. c.131 A)? X Yes No; if yes, has a Notice of Intent been filed or a local Order of Conditions issued? _ Yes X No; if yes, list the date and DEP file number: . Was a the Order of Conditions appealed? _ Yes X No. Will the project require a variance from the Wetlands regulations? X Yes No. The Application for the NOI is currently being Prepared. E. Will the project: 1. be subject to a local wetlands ordinance or bylaw? — Yes X No The proponent is seeking to waive the local wetland bylaws under the MGL Chapter 4013 - Comprehensive Permit Law. 2. alter any federally -protected wetlands not regulated under state or local law? Yes X No; if yes, what is the area (in s.f.)? F. Describe the project's other impacts on wetlands (including new shading of wetland areas or a removal of tree canopy from forested wetlands): There will be some removal of the tree canopy in areas adjacent to the forested wetland areas. r M 111. Waterways and Tidelands Impacts and Permits A. Is any part of the project site waterways or tidelands (including filled former tidelands) that are subject to the Waterways Act, M.G.L.c.91? _ Yes X No; if yes, is there a current Chapter 91 . license or permit affecting the project site? _ Yes X No; if yes, list the date and number: B. Does the project require a new or modified license under M.G.L.c.91? _ Yes X No; if yes, how many acres of the project site subject to M.G.L.c.91 will be for non -water dependent use? NA Current _ Change _ Total — C. Is any part of the project 1. a roadway, bridge, or utility line to or on a barrier beach? _ Yes X No; if yes, describe: 2. dredging or disposal of dredged material? _ Yes X No; if yes, volume of dredged material 3. a solid fill, pile -supported, or bottom -anchored structure in flowed tidelands or other water- ways? `Yes X No; if yes, what is the base area? 4. within a Designated Port Area? — Yes X No D. Describe the project's other impacts on waterways and tidelands: None IV. Consistency: A. Is the project located within the Coastal Zone? _ Yes X No; if yes, describe the project's consistency with policies of the Office of Coastal Zone Management: B. Is the project located within an area subject to a Municipal Harbor Plan? _ Yes X No; if yes, identify the Municipal Harbor Plan and describe the project's consistency with that plan: 571-ENF1 E 1-7 WATER SUPPLY SECTION I. Thresholds/ Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to water supply (see 301 CMR 11.03(4))? _ Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to water supply? _ Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wastewater Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Water Supply Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in gallons/day, the volume and source of water use for existing and proposed activities at the project site: Existing Change Total Withdrawal from groundwater Withdrawal from surface water Interbasin transfer Municipal or regional water supply B. If the source is a municipal or regional supply, has the municipality or region indicated that there is adequate capacity in the system to accommodate the project? _ Yes _ No C. If the project involves a new or expanded withdrawal from a groundwater or surface water source, 1. have you submitted a permit application? _ Yes _ No; if yes, attach the application 2. have you conducted a pump test? _ Yes _ No; if yes, attach the pump test report D. What is the currently permitted withdrawal at the proposed water supply source (in gallons/day)? Will the project require an increase in that withdrawal?_ Yes _ No E. Does the project site currently contain a water supply well, a drinking water treatment facility, water main, or other water supply facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _ Yes _ No. If yes, describe existing and proposed water supply facilities at the project site: Existing Change Total Water supply well(s) (capacity, in gpd) Drinking water treatment plant (capacity, in gpd) Water mains (length, in miles) F. If the project involves any interbasin transfer of water, which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? G. Does the project involve 1. new water service by a state agency to a municipality or water district? _ Yes _ No 2. a Watershed Protection Act variance? _ Yes _ No; if yes, how many acres of alteration? 3. a non -bridged stream crossing 1,000 or less feet upstream of a public surface drinking water supply for purpose of forest harvesting activities? _ Yes _ No H. Describe the project's other impacts (including indirect impacts) on water resources, quality, facilities and services: 111. Consistency -- Describe the project's consistency with water conservation plans or other plans to enhance water resources, quality, facilities and services: 571-ENF1 1-8 n u r -i U n r� LJ n n n n u n LJ n LJ r� U U n LJ u DWASTEWATER SECTION I. Thresholds/ Permits a A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wastewater (see 301 CMR 11.03(5))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: 0 1 B. Is there sufficient capacity in the existing collection system to accommodate the project? Yes X No; if no, describe where capacity will be found: A new sewer collection system will be installed within the project and a new sewer line will be constructed from the site to an existing system 5,000 feet north of the site. C. Is there sufficient existing capacity at the proposed wastewater disposal facility? X Yes _ No; if no, describe how capacity will be increased: D. Does the project site currently contain a wastewater treatment facility, sewer main, or other wastewater disposal facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _ Yes X No. If yes, describe as follows: Wastewater treatment plant (capacity, in gpd) Sewer mains (length, in miles) Title 5 systems (capacity, in gpd) Existing Chane Total 0 0 0 0 5,000 feet 5,000 feet 440 (est) -440 0 E. If the project involves any interbasin transfer of wastewater, which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? NA F. Does the project involve new sewer service by an Agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or sewer district? Yes X No G. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of sewage sludge, sludge ash, grit, screenings, or other sewage residual materials? _ Yes X No; if yes, what is the capacity (in tons per day): Storage Treatment, processing Combustion Disposal 571-ENF1 1-9 Existing Change Total B. Does the project require any state permits related to wastewater? X Yes _ No; if yes, specify which permit: The Project will require a Sewer Connection/Extension Permit. C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Transportation -- Traffic "Yes" Generation Section. If you answered to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wastewater Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in gallons/day, the volume and disposal of wastewater generation for existing and proposed activities at the project site (calculate according to 310 CMR 15.00): Existing Change Total Discharge to groundwater (Title 5) 440 cipd (est) -440 0 Discharge to groundwater (non -Title 5) Unknown 0 Discharge to outstanding resource water Unknown -- 0 Discharge to surface water Unknown -- 0 Municipal or regional wastewater facility 0 63,030 gpd 63,030 qpd Two community buildings are planned as part of the project and they will be restricted to use for a residents only. Therefore, change/total wastewater generation has been accounted for in the respective residential use flow rate calculations noted above. 0 1 B. Is there sufficient capacity in the existing collection system to accommodate the project? Yes X No; if no, describe where capacity will be found: A new sewer collection system will be installed within the project and a new sewer line will be constructed from the site to an existing system 5,000 feet north of the site. C. Is there sufficient existing capacity at the proposed wastewater disposal facility? X Yes _ No; if no, describe how capacity will be increased: D. Does the project site currently contain a wastewater treatment facility, sewer main, or other wastewater disposal facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _ Yes X No. If yes, describe as follows: Wastewater treatment plant (capacity, in gpd) Sewer mains (length, in miles) Title 5 systems (capacity, in gpd) Existing Chane Total 0 0 0 0 5,000 feet 5,000 feet 440 (est) -440 0 E. If the project involves any interbasin transfer of wastewater, which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? NA F. Does the project involve new sewer service by an Agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or sewer district? Yes X No G. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of sewage sludge, sludge ash, grit, screenings, or other sewage residual materials? _ Yes X No; if yes, what is the capacity (in tons per day): Storage Treatment, processing Combustion Disposal 571-ENF1 1-9 Existing Change Total H. Describe. the project's other impacts (including indirect impacts) on wastewater generation and treatment facilities: The existing septic systems will be removed and new sewer lines installed on site and northerly along Route 114 for 5,000 feet. This project will extend sewer service to the Town Line of Middleton and thus will allow existing and future developments to tie into the new sewer line. III. Consistency -- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to wastewater management: A. If the project requires a sewer extension permit, is that extension included in a comprehensive wastewater management plan? —Yes X No; if yes, indicate the EOEA number for the plan and describe the relationship of the project to the plan. TRANSPORTATION -- TRAFFIC GENERATION SECTION Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to traffic generation (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? X Yes _ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to state-controlled roadways? X Yes No; if yes, specify which permit: Highway Access Permit C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Roadways and Other Transportation Facilities Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Traffic Generation Section below. IL Traffic Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed vehicular traffic generated by activities at the project site: Existinq Chane Total Number of parking spaces 12 650 662 Number of vehicle trips per day 10 1,504 1,514 ITE Land Use Code(s): 230 Residential Condominium/Townhouses B. What is the estimated average daily traffic on roadways serving the site? Roadway Existing Change Total 1. Route 114 North of the Site 20,514 752 21,266 2. Route 114 South of the Site 20.514 752 21,266 C. Describe how the project will affect transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services: The project will not have a significant direct effect on transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services. Ill. Consistency -- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with municipal, regional, state, and federal plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services: The proposed project will comply with all appropriate rules and regulations under the Massachusetts 40B process. Onsite design features will be amenable to pedestrian and bicycle transportation. 571-ENF1 1-10 ROADWAYS AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES SECTION aI. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to roadways or other transportation facilities (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? _Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to roadways or other transportation facilities? _ Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered No"to both questions A and B, proceed to the Energy Section. If you stio answered "Yes" to either quen A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Roadways Section below. 11. Transportation Facility Impacts a A. Describe existing and proposed transportation facilities at the project site: Existing Change Total Length (in linear feet) of new or widened roadway Width (in feet) of new or widened roadway Other transportation facilities: a B. Will the project involve any 1. Alteration of bank or terrain (in linear feet)? 2. Cutting of living public shade trees (number)? 3. Elimination of stone wall (in linear feet)? aIll. Consistency -- Describe the project's consistency with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services, including consistency with the applicable regional transportation plan and the Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP), the State Bicycle Plan, and the State Pedestrian Plan: ENERGY SECTION a1. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to energy (see 301 CMR 11.03(7))? _ Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to energy? — Yes X No; if yes, specify awhich permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Air Quality Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Energy Section abelow. 11. Impacts and Permits a A. Describe existing and proposed energy generation and transmission facilities at the project site: Existing Change Total Capacity of electric generating facility (megawatts) Length of fuel line (in miles) a Length of transmission lines (in miles) Capacity of transmission lines (in kilovolts) y 571-ENF1 E 1-11 B. If the project involves construction or expansion of an electric generating facility, what are 1. the facility's current and proposed fuel source(s)? 2. the facility's current and proposed cooling source(s)? C. If the project involves construction of an electrical transmission line, will it be located on a new, unused, or abandoned right of way?_ Yes _ No; if yes, please describe: D. Describe the project's other impacts on energy facilities and services: III. Consistency -- Describe the project's consistency with state, municipal, regional, and federal plans and policies for enhancing energy facilities and services: AIR QUALITY SECTION Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to air quality (see 301 CMR 11.03(8))? _ Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to air quality? _ Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Air Quality Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project involve construction or modification of a major stationary source (see 310 CMR 7.00, Appendix A)?_ Yes _ No; if yes, describe existing and proposed emissions (in tons per day) of: Existing Change Total Particulate matter Carbon monoxide Sulfur dioxide Volatile organic compounds Oxides of nitrogen Lead Any hazardous air pollutant Carbon dioxide B. Describe the project's other impacts on air resources and air quality, including noise impacts: III. Consistency A. Describe the project's consistency with the State Implementation Plan: B. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to air resources and air quality: SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to solid or hazardous waste (see 301 CMR 11.03(9))? _ Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: 571-ENF1 1-12 n n u t i 11 D r II 1 B. Does the project require any state permits related to solid and hazardous waste? _ Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of solid waste? _ Yes _ No; if yes, what is the volume (in tons per day) of the capacity: Existing Change Total Storage Treatment, processing Combustion Disposal B. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, recycling, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste? _ Yes _ No; if yes, what is the volume (in tons or gallons per day) of the capacity: Existing Change Total Storage Recycling Treatment Disposal C. If the project will generate solid waste (for example, during demolition or construction), describe alternatives considered for re -use, recycling, and disposal: D. If the project involves demolition, do any buildings to be demolished contain asbestos? Yes _ No E. Describe the project's other solid and hazardous waste impacts (including indirect impacts): Ill. Consistency --Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with the State Solid Waste Master Plan: HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SECTION I. Thresholds / Impacts A. Is any part of the project site a historic structure, or a structure within a historic district, in either case listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? _ Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the demolition of all or any exterior part of such historic structure? _ Yes _ No; if yes, please describe: B. Is any part of the project site an archaeological site listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? _ Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the destruction of all or any part of such archaeological site? Yes _ No; if yes, please describe: C. If you answered "No" to all parts of both questions A and B, proceed to the Attachments and Certifications Sections. If you answered "Yes" to any part of either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section below. D. Have you consulted with the Massachusetts Historical Commission? _ Yes No; if yes, attach correspondence. 571-ENF1 a 1-13 E. Describe and assess the project's other impacts, direct and indirect, on listed or inventoried historical and archaeological resources: 11. Consistency -- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to preserving historical and archaeological resources: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of existing conditions of the project site and its immediate context, showing all known structures, roadways and parking lots, rail rights-of-way, wetlands and water bodies, wooded areas, farmland, steep slopes, public open spaces, and major utilities. 2. Plan of proposed conditions upon completion of project (if construction of the project is proposed to be phased, there should be a site plan showing conditions upon the completion of each phase). 3. Original U.S.G.S. map or good quality color copy (8 %2 x 11 inches or larger) indicating the project location and boundaries 4 List of all agencies and persons to whom the proponent circulated the ENF, in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). 5. Other: CERTIFICATIONS: 1. The Public Notice of Environmental Review has been/will be published in the following newspapers in accordance with 301 CMR 11.15(1) (Name) (Date) Lawrence Eagle -Tribune 3�4 i�Z 2. This form has been cir mated to Agencies and Pia sons in ccordan with 301 CMR 11. 2). Date Signature of Responsible Officer teSignature of person prepa mg ENF or Proponent (if different from above) Thomas D. Laudani Name (print or type) Valley Realty Development, LLC Firm/Agency 342 North Main Street Street Andover. MA 01810 Municipality/State/Zip q70 978-bW-8257 Phohe Dermot J. Kelly, PE, PTOE Name (print or type) DJK Associates, Inc. Firm/Agency 280 Main Street, Suite 204 Street North Reading, MA 01864 Municipality/State/Zip 978-664-2205 Phone r� u 1-14 n u ATTACHMENT 1: EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN n 1 III 0 LI 1 N N 1 Ill a571-ENF IN FIx A rjjG) o z o g A@ IS Tos Sm PUN MO PAD00J K MIM Kuy VAS P OWE BY Om ASSOGAIES &W J" POO OM 9M HUMAIM POW BY NW OE99A SNADA M AND WOMM MV= Bf kNAL WMMBI IIOI CLL- M Gm 4=ATB YAVS NO CLAN W OE AMRAOY Or RE WMA= 91M ON THS OAWK n o PROJECT: DRAWLING TITLE: APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: SITE ENGINEER: > �� THE MEADOWS EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN VALLEY REALTY G * S *D G�! G A tea. N DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. 2357 TURNPIKE STREET N P.O. BOX 3039 A S S 0 C l A T E S o NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845Bre �+a u■+■i 1YI��h BIBBB N ANDOVER, MA 01810 148 MAIN STREET, BLDG. "A" N. ANDOVER, MA 01845 TEL.976) 688-5422 FAX: (j978) 68&5717 0 z ;q D m ]Se$ o o Z -nm-0 �� a mmc-z 00 m Z A O m X 0 o y r*I rmZ�x O s> gill Oo4 mNOO c -n zm� Oo >m U) 0o 1'5180. mm o g A@ IS Tos Sm PUN MO PAD00J K MIM Kuy VAS P OWE BY Om ASSOGAIES &W J" POO OM 9M HUMAIM POW BY NW OE99A SNADA M AND WOMM MV= Bf kNAL WMMBI IIOI CLL- M Gm 4=ATB YAVS NO CLAN W OE AMRAOY Or RE WMA= 91M ON THS OAWK n o PROJECT: DRAWLING TITLE: APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: SITE ENGINEER: > �� THE MEADOWS EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN VALLEY REALTY G * S *D G�! G A tea. N DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. 2357 TURNPIKE STREET N P.O. BOX 3039 A S S 0 C l A T E S o NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845Bre �+a u■+■i 1YI��h BIBBB N ANDOVER, MA 01810 148 MAIN STREET, BLDG. "A" N. ANDOVER, MA 01845 TEL.976) 688-5422 FAX: (j978) 68&5717 n W z C 0 z 0 0 z THS ffff PLM NO ROMMM W¢ 064AY els PW1PID BY M IssflMIES SM WON PBOf4FT19t#1EY eiOAM PBBW BY MF BFSIGfI SUX ql No EPOMW PBBiIOPID BY AMAL PBDTWVM fRDU COL- EW ® AMMAI 5 MM W OM TO 1K tiApi a OF PE MWAIM RM ON MOAN& DRAWING TITLE: APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: SITE ENGINEER: EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN VALLEY REALTY G • S ♦p DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. ..�,.... G�IGZA P.O. BOX 3039 A S S O C) A T76 8 ANDOVER, MA 01810 148 MAIN STREET, BLDG. "A" N. ANDOVER MA 01845 TEL: (978 688-5422 FAX: (978 6865717 PROJECT: y; THE MEADOWS ^' 2357 TURNPIKE STREET o N NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 DRAWING TITLE: APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: SITE ENGINEER: EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN VALLEY REALTY G • S ♦p DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. ..�,.... G�IGZA P.O. BOX 3039 A S S O C) A T76 8 ANDOVER, MA 01810 148 MAIN STREET, BLDG. "A" N. ANDOVER MA 01845 TEL: (978 688-5422 FAX: (978 6865717 10 rn o � o m��z z as -o m�oo d D m rZ� �% _ { i � p Ir Oa m'00 0 Z 0! ` L O f+1 z T10 0 O � D RI �� f { I t ,,' O G 11 p �' ,'r ,' O R i r ! " f '4'' �� /� �'. • t� f'P 1. / 1 `� f ,•', ,-� ,j(�`[�) it f �; k� 'r " !tiJ�- . � .r.'� '_�yr'• \ I Ji Q' j � V - -- ------ CPO ------ --------------_ I 4 4", V 11E INS SIE PUN Ng PROWL AW YALE OKAY WAS FR PNED 6Y ® AMAISS SM 1f41 iPRRM SA*Y WMADOI P$VMM BY IK OMOR SAM IN AV IOFOWAPIO' PROMRD BY AMAL HW1DMWr FRW CLL -EASE 0.0 ASSOpAlES PANES NO QAY W 11E PDQIIAC7 611E PfTfOfAmN 910N ON R6 DPA'NI[t PROJECT: DRAWING TITLE: APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: SITE ENGINEER: n z ➢ O —' C7 THE MEADOWS EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN VALLEY REALTY G * S *D DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. GZA CsZ\I 2357 TURNPIKE STREET NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 P.O. BOX 3039 A S S O C I A T E S ANDOVER, MA 01810 148 MAIN STREET, BLDG. "A• N. ANDOVER, MA 01845 TEL: (978)) FAX:(978 688 5717 }Awa..,ave:...,.Avn4•••••�•.aq.rrrwww rrw,a ..s4Y weeuSrz aATTACHMENT 2: FUTURE CONDITIONS SITE PLAN 11 El El Fli E571-ENF O O O CD O CO O O O CO CO L -D O O O O O CO CO '•� , i + � 38.88- '�'^�� tIts Cbh LDG F119.7",, C 1 no r. cps h�1I Ij{ ° f F r r qw , r N4754'I 7E, � -- H 'i�� x` `i tri• ��' ' u q _ d r� �9D 2 .- o• i 'G #4 II f{ v ft` QQQQ e 51, g i i 'l ,\. , •,✓1 + 4148 y 146 t r 'p; to BLDG #3 > - �''/ i/ j ��' •,� �'; ' i' , � �� • off., - � � r' • `% -- - -- ' � I O sDs-- --- m , f NO` Uu9 ,n - — l or 0 9 y i � F �•, _ ra, I l 'k i I , G ' m DET .4 ON t � ra to v v • 'o m •D f y -o A M Ae K40 '0 D D 31 .'0 b o o o O O O O O O Kc O 0 O O� O� 09 O� O 's y O O O O O O= z O ow i m m m m fN�l fyn G] O 0 D d > � P I ggAAgg� Q Fz , m u C �0 a%�tlA D Z z z to -ai i o 00 ) to ^ m :4Z Z r yp ll N pp _ i48�n �OU Z p N m 2 O A A O /', " ••, �g9��' \ �y3� "' N€ m O m z�iZzo ss aa' _ 1 iN ,eA OC =O x0 A O AC $ A z m m '� to Ln 3 E 10 srz RAN n WWNW WE GMAT N3 FWAND BY QD AgWAIS Z P OW " WaWff sa!`cT W MADIrI mD4f1tD 6f Ins OE4ut SNLEK ILL uo wFMAWY ap � FM%= BY AUM RaMOL Y FRW Ca- EAST AMDATES MUS ro QM W K Ao0.00 OF 9E @ MhIP WMI M E1 W MND GQ o ARCHITECT: SITE ENGINEER: z , PROJECT: DRAWING TITLE: APPLICANT: _ I r:� o m SITE DEVELOPMENT AND VALLA' REALTY G* S o,D 6 THE MEADOWS AND GRADING PLAN ��IGZA )> N DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. ��� N 2357 TURNPIKE STREET P.O. BOX 3039 A S S O C I A T E S Yeea#ammmbl, mo. NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 ANDOVER, MA 01810 148 MAIN STREET, BLDG. 'A' m N. ANDOVER, MA 01845 TEL: (978) 888.5422 FAX: (978) 688.5717 MS 91E KM = NAliDMAPI C WAE MAT YEAS iNf M BY GSD AMOABS BASID IAGN ffim Y 9A1tY "WmAlm K MOS BY IK DMOL ikm MI ND YGVmww NMA= BY ASML. PNDYOpNABY YNOY CCL- 6 , GO ASMATES HAM ND MM YO YN3 A 0ky Cr N *MAIN %W Q7 TNS MW n z ; PROJECT: DRAWING TITLE: APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: SITE ENGINEER: 0 N W N THE MEADOWS SITE DEVELOPMENT AND AND GRADING PLAN VALLEY REALTY DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. G * S *D riz iG� 2357 TURNPIKE STREET P.O. BOX 3039 ASSOCIATES deo. NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 N ANDOVER, MA 01810 148 MAIN STREET, BLDG. "A" ^' N. ANDOVER, MA 01845 TEL (978) 688-5422 FAX: (978) 68M717 - ----------- - -------------- m [A -0 T T 'D CD MD g M 'u -u -o -u m m 00000 , M 0 ;u 8 1 ;u ;u 0;0 ;a m m m m x x 'A 00000 -u -01 0 --10 c9 z oc' m .0 -0 0ou o' ';7 --- 0 0 0Np+0 0 0 2 -74 rn In NN ON 'A 'n 0 'A --------- r > ? z z 0 ? o O 'o 2z 0 C33 z Q zo 0 4?l Y^ z 0 Z c: 00 0 as 0 -nc 0 c c c" m m c al z AF do IG - 17 Cb All A 4D Q) M 0 m <Z m r 0 'u ` : ` fid; `rq¢2 �JP p Aa" m cb- All/ > A A 0 56 I;b co, ------------- z Ell U) MAI A lie P..."' PIAZ FIVAD BY CM ASSOUAIS No M pKma we MWIM if or iff Dm P= M go 7"mofy PROWD ft AM WWWA RM CDL- LAST CZ ASMOM MMM NO 0010 X AMW OF X IMAM " 04 VG 00*t z PROJECT: DRAWING TITLE: APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: SITE ENGINEER: THE MEADOWS SITE DEVELOPMENT AND VALLEY REALTY 9D AND GRADING PLAN (j S' *D "m2357 TURNPIKE STREET DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. GZA 43 P.O. BOX 3039 cffZxlGsdhvhwnwnftL b^ NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 ASSOCIATES ANDOVER, MA 01810 148 MAIN STREET, BLDG. 'A" N. ANDOVER, MA 01845 EL:1111 22 TAX: T (97) 17 N 0 or �m m ' D m J I 91. 0 I1 lo- � g , jm�99 �' all a II` !9 I n o > PROJECT: DRAWVING TITLE: APPLICANT., ARCHITECT: SITE ENGINEER: I EROSION AND SEDIMENT THE MEADOWS VALLEY REALTY ['y $* T CONTROL DETAILS DEVELOPMENT L.L.C. -� ��1G� O i 2357 TURNPIKE STREET P.O. BOX 30'9 A s s 0 C r A TEs owdwdm=mu% lee NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 ANDOVER, MA 01810 148 MAIN STREET, BLDG. 'A' N. ANDOVER. MA 01845 TEL 78 888-5422 FAX 9 888-5717 0 o a o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 F�wg�e N N e�a,a,• > £R oO 8^$$!$e m :•spa; GO • I w I �izf:, ����1 • l � �? 3 � � ,A. >r. . / ��,_ 1'11 ,�' o, ► `},��- „� ni `�-y BASED UPON PROPERTY SURVEY NiOP.NARON PROOIDED BY VHF DESK. SALIN. TIM AHD iCPOC9APH1' ---------- b. 1-£ GSD ASSOCIATES NARES NO CLAN LO THE ACCURACY 6 THE IRFORMADON SNOAN ON THISER•AKS ``^.a N ^moi VALLEY REALTY D�•�oT: D cot 71 m . m iiF If'F�IdIi II,i n �.., 0 Cn0 c A X22 2357 TURNPIKE STREET ANDOVER, MA 01810 4 E< u o I n v m } -� 4-04jv N FAX: (978) 688-5717 m np^ y • ti. cj - wNm _ n n O a D i 1191 HIM MINIMUM F' D � O c D y O I I III Mo 11111 NONUNION 1111 _ Nn� o w av 111111 loll smil • I w I �izf:, ����1 • l � �? 3 � � ,A. >r. . / ��,_ 1'11 ,�' o, ► `},��- „� ni `�-y BASED UPON PROPERTY SURVEY NiOP.NARON PROOIDED BY VHF DESK. SALIN. TIM AHD iCPOC9APH1' ---------- b. 1-£ GSD ASSOCIATES NARES NO CLAN LO THE ACCURACY 6 THE IRFORMADON SNOAN ON THISER•AKS ``^.a N ^moi VALLEY REALTY D�•�oT: D cot 71 m . m iiF If'F�IdIi II,i n �.., 0 Cn0 c A X22 2357 TURNPIKE STREET ANDOVER, MA 01810 4 E< u o I II yam- � f ° '`� .�\� yJ �� �� ♦{Y � i _ ,y{ �' THIS SHE PLAN AND PHDIOORAPHIC IMAGE OYARLAT WAS PREPARED BY CSD ASSOCIAICS `�-y BASED UPON PROPERTY SURVEY NiOP.NARON PROOIDED BY VHF DESK. SALIN. TIM AHD iCPOC9APH1' ---------- ¢£Q-"B� THIS PLAN IS PREPAREDFOR PRELNNARY PLAII.IIIIS PURPOSES GNLY. 1-£ GSD ASSOCIATES NARES NO CLAN LO THE ACCURACY 6 THE IRFORMADON SNOAN ON THISER•AKS ``^.a /-� Z VALLEY REALTY D�•�oT: D 'a 71 m . m iiF If'F�IdIi II,i n �.., 0 W A is 2357 TURNPIKE STREET ANDOVER, MA 01810 4 E< u NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 I n v m } -� 4-04jv N FAX: (978) 688-5717 THIS SHE PLAN AND PHDIOORAPHIC IMAGE OYARLAT WAS PREPARED BY CSD ASSOCIAICS `�-y BASED UPON PROPERTY SURVEY NiOP.NARON PROOIDED BY VHF DESK. SALIN. TIM AHD iCPOC9APH1' OHN PROYDED BT AFETAL PHOTOGRAPHY FROM COT- F/,Si ¢£Q-"B� THIS PLAN IS PREPAREDFOR PRELNNARY PLAII.IIIIS PURPOSES GNLY. 1-£ GSD ASSOCIATES NARES NO CLAN LO THE ACCURACY 6 THE IRFORMADON SNOAN ON THISER•AKS ``^.a /-� Z VALLEY REALTY D�•�oT: D 1 o B G F e a `y ° I ' \� / E -FOS THE MEADOWS W A is 2357 TURNPIKE STREET ANDOVER, MA 01810 4 E< N°o NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 ,r-; n v m } -� 4-04jv N FAX: (978) 688-5717 t O I ,......-- Li D 0 n D rn m o e a pnp 6^ A^^ VALLEY REALTY g Q u D a _ R€ B G F e a `y ° I ' \� / E -FOS 4 'i•4, ^j A �� �.I *sy -. ANDOVER, MA 01810 4 E< D � � • ,r-; n v m } -� 4-04jv FAX: (978) 688-5717 m np^ y • t O I ,......-- pA m m O z n Li D 0 n D rn m o e a pnp 6^ A^^ VALLEY REALTY g Q u D a _ R€ B G F e a `y ° I ' pA m m O z n rn m 1011 y D 0 n D rn m o e a pnp 6^ A^^ VALLEY REALTY g Q u D a _ R€ B G F e a `y ° m A g R S 4 e A e ANDOVER, MA 01810 4 E< D n v m u FAX: (978) 688-5717 m np^ y ti. cj - wNm _ n n O a D i 1191 F' D � O c D y O z Mo _ Nn� o w av NINE YITTLE: APPLICANT: AMC-NnEC f: D PRELIMINARY 51TE PLAN VALLEY REALTY G5D A550CIATE5 DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. 148 MAIN STREET, BLDG. "A" o P P.O. BOX 3039 N. ANDOVER, MA 01845 ANDOVER, MA 01810 D TEL: (978) 688-5422 m FAX: (978) 688-5717 6' h Tun � rI• / , t "� ? IX �4f� 5\ ��� • . E7ba'�°i'' �- � �� �.. c�Y'y� d `�:d' .'' ��yy� ;btl� : v1 kDi d \ N .' .bj� # '4:>- ,(� ✓ 4as,�': �- sI�, r a v�ln Sip Li1� �; 4 •' ��� 3� q f � � Fµ I W" y 5 '� �, 9�Yi,'F „n `r o` v���. `��r •w _ � r '. � Ips � F N� •y � � �1 ��s r�l ' �„y? ,y ! J,b, . •t c,�,�Q1. N � •iZ byI i " - t a " ` " " , w '"� ° - °Y ISG xf r 5�y" ° a ��� �1/ ` o 'ti � '�y� f { •� '(5 yl' a a!�', ;.err �.• ;� is ,' e�'hf: ' Wi Th" J41 OKI FA - Y tai // ^i Ik• .: 1��6 '_ ',. Si%fj� �,•Sfrfur 61` -'.� , -e r. � ,- fi'� � e = i';.e:?,� 'fit.. :�/�E � •I � i / Iojw 401 F1 W P Iri""� hi 1S }lllVv�gjl4... • k k�lu°X ' �� 5"/;� � � ' '�� � �.,�J, a a:r �, . �P .A%,,vY T y17 /4 r 1 b1 I 4iJawr e . � a r per. 147 �..', c C� CD D O C7 O C7 O CO O O � 0 0 0 � 0 C -O O - 9 � ar � ' • Ae. Now— ■/'� a }f5 '�+4�9•�R[� Y rY3''SS � I = Jug TM���� ` 'sP IT WE dam, �r J ��r4 � ��' p � � � �„ f y� P• � �� 41 ' t + u WIN 1 %. i L • "t4 T" C " 1, .r a • _. ,� , „ x *sly I. ( � 4 ;. T I �•'qti � � F 6. 8'` �� . �.. ,a6 llki IN RIM 4i Y'�. � k /'.'S�;�In: � 1F'• n 1' '� • yR �t r �u`"� � � s N� r!C'� �, N�W ��! �Iw�ul, ,q"0 � +u' � .rte' �"k:,' '•i �,� 4 ..1 ./',�4.. � ''�f � Y� �. � r�M4�NN u � ,�., ! ). �• A y�V+ y I .t �i"A , f ' � to ,�J+•` ,'�"� 4.2 yk,' �,. 9 � i t?I• �MI �, �. y ,�r .. �w 1lLr"-r y\ w 1q )y�� _-n : " 4 c' " r � .rte q �;. 1" 1�1• G� _ \ fff✓✓✓ �i 'I ^�. J � ..war^... � ,,w,Q .� + ,t'1 � �/ 11, " x.19• �� � .' t � ti , '"M' � �a I.a � t+"k• i. }� � 1 h7 ,� r,w:'Y -ami I '. � :i,tr '�•.•Fr N'T4 al:,� r+:i { 1 + ` .,�+_A 1 •/. �� 11= f ^"'fir �' • �, � i , �1 ' '�• + U� li� ,�... � ,'•' - Ao AV. mMIM Ar 1. f7i Jr Ax "s Ilu :7 �'++ t� y A lam# F y ",.. f { 1 h ��. v4 ,Ate_"N; q i4 L. , . y J �1 - 1 d� C pATTACHMENT 3: USGS LOCUS MAP c 8 C C C C C C571-ENF C 1 8 c D G C Figure 1-1: USGS Locus Map C&#KTraffic Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Engineering/Transportation Planning Copyright Q 2002 By DJK. All rights reserved. K.\571\571FlG1 G C2.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT AND ACCESS STUDY C C D '71 C C 11 C El C571-ENF-2 TRAFFIC IMPACT AND ACCESS STUDY PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT The Meadows North Andover, Massachusetts Proponent Valley Realty Development, LLC Andover, Massachusetts August 30, 2002 prepared by Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning 280 Main Street, Suite 204 North Reading, MA 01864-1300 978-664-2205 Fax: 978-664-2444 571-ENF2 Copyright @ 2002 DJK. All rights reserved. n n 2.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT AND ACCESS STUDY LJ 0 0 I I 2.1 OVERVIEW Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. (DJK) has conducted a Traffic Impact and Access Study for the proposed residential development project, The Meadows, to be located adjacent to Route 114 west of the Route 114/Sharpner's Pond Road intersection in North Andover, Massachusetts. Figure 2-1 graphically illustrates the project site location in relation to the local and regional roadway system. This report identifies existing traffic operation parameters on the adjacent roadway system, evaluates the anticipated traffic volume increases as a result of the proposed project, and analyzes the site -generated traffic -related impacts. LI T he proposed project as presently planned consists of the construction of a total of 270 residential condominium dwelling units. The proposed access to the site would consist of two curb cuts along Route 114. The North Site Drive would be located opposite aSharpner's Pond Road. The South Site Drive would be located opposite an Industrial Drive. 0 2.2 TRAFFIC IMPACT AND ACCESS STUDY — EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 0 2.2.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Analysis of the recent traffic counts indicates that approximately 20,514 vpd (vehicles per day) traveled along Route 114 adjacent to the site during February 2002. During the two peak travel demand periods, which occurred between 7:00 and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 and 6:00 PM, an average of approximately 1,980 and 1,804 vph (vehicles per hour) were observed along Route 114 during the weekday morning and evening Qpeak hours, respectively. 2-1 571-ENF2 Copyright @ 2002 DJK. All rights reserved. E C L, 2.2.2 SITE -GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates, it is anticipated that the proposed residential development project would generate approximately 1,514 vehicle -trips per day. This daily volume would be split evenly with 757 vehicle -trips entering and 757 vehicle -trips exiting the site over the course of the Ell entire 24-hour day. More importantly, during the weekday morning peak hour, the entire residential development project would generate a total of 112 vehicle -trips with 19 vehicle -trips entering and 93 vehicle -trips exiting the project site. Similarly, during the evening peak hour, it is anticipated that 140 vehicle -trips would be generated. The 140 vehicle -trips would consist of 94 vehicle -trips entering and 46 vehicle -trips exiting the development during the peak 60 -minute period. The remaining vehicle -trips would occur over the course of the day. 2.2.3 TRAFFIC CAPACITY ANALYSIS Unsignalized intersection capacity analysis was performed for the study area intersections. The capacity analysis is summarized below by location. CRoute 114 at the North Site Drive and Sharpner's Pond Road Under 2007 Build with mitigation and development traffic volume conditions, the left- and right -turn exiting movements would operate at LOS D or better and the left -tum entering movement would operate at LOS A. On Sharpner's Pond Road the left and right turns would deteriorate to LOS E. Under Build conditions and without mitigation the LOS would further deteriorate to LOS F. Under 2007 Build conditions with mitigation the LOS would improve to LOS D or better. Mitigation includes the construction of a right -turn lane along Sharpner's Pond Road. C� Route 114 at the South Site Drive and Industrial Drive Under 2007 Build with development traffic volume conditions, the left- and right -turn exiting movements from industrial Drive would operate at LOS C or better up through 2007. The left- and right -turns exiting the Proposed South Site Drive would operate at LOS C. The left -turn movements from Route 114 would operate at LOS A. 2.2.4 MITIGATION MEASURES The final phase of the analysis process is to identify the mitigation measures necessary to minimize the impact of the project on the transportation system. The proponent has made a commitment to implement all mitigation measures listed below: • It is suggested that the proposed project have two access drives. The North Site Drive is suggested to be aligned with Sharpner's Pond Road with the South Site Drive located approximately 300 feet south of the North Site Drive. 2-2 571-ENF2 El Copyright @ 2002 DJK. All rights reserved. n u n To enhance the overall sight distance at the intersection of the proposed driveways, l_J it is recommended that roadside vegetation and topographic ground elevations adjacent to the access/egress driveways be maintained such that sufficient safety 7 sight lines are provided in both directions throughout the life of the project. This eJ� triangular area should extend 14.4 feet (4.4 meters) to 17.8 feet (5.4 meters) back from the existing edge of the roadway (representing an existing vehicle) and extend n 610 feet in each direction along Route 114 (representing an approaching vehicle). , • The proposed North Site Drive is suggested to consist of a minimum 24 -foot wide r--1 cross section with one 12 -foot wide lane for entering traffic and one 12 -foot wide lane for exiting traffic. Intersection corner radii are suggested to be 30 feet. The South Site Drive is suggested to be constructed with an acceleration and r_1 • deceleration taper of 15:1 with a 12 -foot offset and 30 -foot radius. Egress from the L_J site is suggested to consist of two lanes, a left -turn lane and a right -turn lane over a distance of 50 feet. Access into the site is suggested to consist of a single lane. All lanes are suggested to be 12 feet wide. • Intersection advanced warning signs are suggested to be placed along Route 114 in advance of the access/egress driveways. • In order to improve the LOS operation condition along Sharpner's Pond Road it is r7p suggested that Sharpner's Pond Road be widened to accommodate two 12 -foot wide U approach lanes for a distance of 100 or more feet from Route 114. 2.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.3.1 FIELD SURVEY n Li n Li n A comprehensive field inventory of the adjacent roadway system was conducted during February and March 2002. The field inventory included collection of existing roadway Li geometrics, traffic volumes, vehicle speeds, and safety data for the roadways in the n vicinity of the site. Traffic volumes were measured by means of automatic traffic recorder (ATR) counts and substantiated by manual intersection turning -movement and vehicle -classification counts (TMC). Safety inventories included vehicle speed observations and a detailed evaluation of the safety sight lines at the proposed driveways located along Route 114. M 2.3.2 GEOMETRICS Route 114 u M u Route 114 is generally a three -lane roadway with one through lane for each direction of travel and a dual use center left -turn lane located opposite the site. South of the site r_ Route 114 is a two-lane roadway with one -lane provided for each direction of travel. The u travel lanes are generally 12 feet wide with an 8 -foot to 10 -foot gravel shoulder on each n 2-3 571-ENF2 Copyright @ 2002 DJK. All rights reserved. LJ J C C C side of the roadway. Route 114 provides access/egress to numerous adjacent highway commercial/retail and residential land uses along its entire length. Route 114 consists of bituminous concrete pavement in fair condition with no major pavement break-up of edge raveling noted during the field inventory period. Horizontal and vertical alignments are fair along Route 114 with the roadway passing the site driveway over relatively level/tangent alignment. Vehicular movements along Route 114 in the vicinity of the site are generally uncontrolled with side streets and driveways under STOP control. 2.3.3 TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing traffic volumes were recorded mechanically by an automatic traffic recorder (ATR) and were substantiated by actual manual intersection turning movement and vehicle classification counts (TMC). These traffic volumes were reviewed to determine average daily and peak -hour traffic volumes on the study area roadways. Table 2-1 summarizes the 2002 ATR traffic volume data collected long Route 114. Figures 2-2 and 2-3 graphically present the results of the manual intersection turning movement counts. C Analysis of the recent traffic counts indicates that approximately 20,514 vpd (vehicles per day) traveled along Route 114 south of Sharpner's Pond Road during February 2002. During the two peak travel demand periods, which occurred between 7:00 and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 and 6:00 PM, approximately 1,980 and 1,804 vph (vehicles per hour) were observed along Route 114 during the weekday morning and evening peak hours, respectively. a TABLE 2-1 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY D C Daily Traffic Peak -Hour Location/ (24 hour) Peak Traffic Volume K Time Period (vpd)a Hour (vph)b Factorc Route 114 South of Sharpner's Pond Road: Thursday 20,365 7:15-8:15 AM 2,010 9.9% February 5, 2002 4:45-5:45 PM 1,755 8.6% Friday 20,663 7:30-8:30 AM 1,950 9.4% February 6, 2002 5:00-6:00 PM 1,853 9.1% Average 20,514 Morning Peak 1,980 9.7% Weekday Evening Peak 1,804 8.8% Vehicles per day. bvehicles per hour. cPercent of daily traffic occurring during the peak hour. 2-4 71-ENF2 Copyright @ 2002 DJK. All rights reserved. Figure 2-2: 2002 Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour Traffic Volumes tSchematic Nota - Estimated DJKDermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Trafftc Engineering/Transportation Planning Copyright 0 2002 By DX. NI rights reserved. K:\571\571Ni1.D1M I C C C C EI C C C C Figure 2-3: 2002 Existing Weekday Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes tSchematic Nota • = Estimated DJKDermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning Copyright © 2002 By DX All rights reserved. K.\571\571N72.DW 2.3.4 VEHICLE SPEEDS Speed measurements were taken by a standard traffic engineering procedure called the "floating car method." Vehicle speeds were measured by means of an observation car traveling through the study area at a speed consistent with the flow of traffic on the roadway. A limited number of these observations were made over the field inventory period along Route 114 adjacent to the site. The limited number of speed observations were obtained to gain a meaningful value of an average and typical vehicle traveling through the area. The results of the speed measurements are summarized in Table 2-2. As shown, the average speed varied along Route 114 with speeds recorded in the range of 45 to 55 mph in both the northbound and southbound directions. The posted speed limit is 45 mph along Route 114. TABLE 2-2 OBSERVED ROADWAY SPEED SUMMARY Location/ Posted/Official Observed Direction Speed Travel of Travel Limit (mph) Speed (mph) Route 114 adjacent to the Project Site: Northbound 45 45 to 55 Southbound 45 45 to 55 mph = miles per hour. 2.4 FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUME CONDITIONS This section of the report determines the future traffic volume levels along the study area roadways and intersection. To determine the impact of site -generated traffic volumes on the roadway network under future conditions, the existing traffic volumes in the study area were projected to the year 2007 to be consistent with Massachusetts State guidelines for Traffic Impact Assessments. Traffic volumes on the roadway network at that time will include all existing traffic, background traffic growth, and the site -generated traffic volumes. 2.4.1 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH Traffic growth on area roadways is a function of the expected land development in the immediate area as well as the surrounding region. Several methods can be used to estimate this growth. A procedure frequently employed is to identify the location and type of new developments planned to occur during the designated planning horizon, n LJ n Li M L_, n Li r1 n Li n Li n u n LJ n n LJ LJ 2-5 577-ENF2 Copyright @ 2002 DJK. All rights reserved. n eJ El C El C Eli C El C El CII w C C estimate the traffic to be generated and assign it to the area roadway network. This method usually produces a realistic estimate of growth for local traffic. The Planning Office for the Town of North Andover was consulted during the data collection phase of this Study to identify existing and projected development projects anticipated to occur by 2007. Based on this information and other background information, it was assumed for traffic planning purposes that the following projects are constructed and operational by 2007: • 79 residential condominiums to be located along Route 114 opposite Johnson Street (Boston Hill) • 95 single-family homes located along Route 114 opposite the site (Forest View); and • 66,700 square foot retail facility located along Route 114 north of the site. In addition to the development projects noted above, existing traffic volumes were increased by 1% per year up through 2007 to account for background traffic growth which may occur from other development projects not anticipated at this time. Figures 2-4 and 2-5 graphically present the 2007 No Build weekday morning and evening peak -hour traffic volumes. 2.4.2 VEHICLE -TRIP GENERATION Traffic volumes generated by residential developments normally follow well-established patterns with respect to magnitude and temporal distribution. Measurements of numerous such developments conducted by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) have established trip generation rates, which have been standardized for analysis purposes. The rates at which residential projects generate vehicle -trips depend on the type of residential project; i.e., single-family units versus condominiums. Accordingly, the ITE Trip Generation Manual was researched with the appropriate vehicle -trip generation characteristics applied to the proposed project. Based on the ITE trip generation rates, it is anticipated that the proposed residential development project would generate an average of approximately 1,514 vehicle -trips per day. This daily volume would be split evenly with 757 vehicle -trips entering and 757 vehicle -trips exiting the site over the course of the entire 24-hour day. More importantly, during the weekday morning peak hour, the entire residential development project would generate on average a total of 112 vehicle -trips with 19 vehicle -trips entering and 93 vehicle -trips exiting the project site. Similarly, during the evening peak hour, it is anticipated that on average 140 vehicle -trips would be generated. The 140 vehicle -trips would consist of 94 vehicle -trips entering and 46 vehicle -trips exiting the development during the peak 60 -minute period. The remaining vehicle -trips would occur over the course of the day. Table 2-3 summarizes the peak -hour and daily project -generated traffic volumes for the proposed residential development project. 2-6 571-ENF2 Copyright @ 2002 DJK. All rights reserved. M Figure 2-4: 2007 No—Build Weekday Morning n Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Lj M Li >J tJ M u u Schematic Note: • ® Estimated n DJKDermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning Copyright ® 2002 By DJC. All rights reserved. K:\571\571NT3.DV* tJ Figure 2-5: 2007 No—Build Weekday Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Schematic Note: • = Estimated f n DJKTraffic Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Engineering/Transportation Planning Copyright © 2002 By DJK. NI rights reserved. K:\571\571NuoVM TABLE 2-3 VEHICLE -TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY Time Period/ 270 Direction of Travel Condominiums WEEKDAY Morning Peak Hour: Entering (vph)a 19 Exiting (vph) 93 Total (vph) 112 Evening Peak Hour: Entering (vph) 94 Exiting (vph) 46 Total (vph) 140 Daily Trak: Entering (vpd)b 757 Exiting (vpd) 757 Total (vpd) 1,514 'vph = vehicle -trips per hour. bvpd = vehicle -trips per day. 2.4.3 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT n U n Li n Li n u n Lj Directional distribution of generated trips to and from the proposed development is expected to follow existing traffic patterns which, in turn, is a function of population n densities, shopping opportunities, areas of employment and recreational activities. Accordingly, the directional split of the new trips originating from, or destined to, the `J development was based on existing traffic patterns as observed for this study. r_1 The site -generated traffic volumes were superimposed onto the 2007 No Build traffic `-' volume networks creating the 2007 Build traffic volume networks. Figures 2-6 and 2-7 graphically present the 2007 Build weekday morning and evening peak -hour traffic volume networks. 2.5 TRAFFIC OPERATION ANALYSIS n To assess quality of flow along the study area roadways and intersections, an Lj Intersection Capacity Analysis was conducted under the following analysis conditions: • 2002 Existing Traffic Volume Conditions • 2007 No Build Traffic Volume Conditions • 2007 Build Traffic Volume Conditions without Mitigation • 2007 Build Traffic Volume Conditions with Mitigation 2-7 571-ENF2 Copyright @ 2002 DJK. All rights reserved. n Lj n n eJ C C G c Figure 2-6: 2007 Build Weekday Morning Peak Hour Traffic Volumes P C �O 110 70 >z 110 20 QO S � 2` C C E, C C C c C In S� 9 out 93 Total 112 Legend: xx Total Vehicle Trips (g) Site Generated Trips Only Note: • Estimated Schematic Neg. = Negligibi DJKDermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning Copyright © 2002 By DX. All rights reserved. K:\571\571NT5.DW Figure 2-7: 2007 Build Weekday Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Legend: xx Total Vehicle Trips (x) Site Generated Trips Only Note:* - Estimated Schematic Neg. = Negiigibi DJKDermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning Copyright Q 2002 By DJK. All rights reserved. K:\571\571NT6.DW The Capacity Analysis will provide an indication of how well the roadway facilities serve the traffic demands placed upon them. 2.5.1 METHODOLOGY Level of Service The primary result of capacity analysis is the assignment of level of service to a traffic Cj facilities under various traffic -flow conditions.' The concept of level of service is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream and a their perception by motorists and/or passengers. A level -of -service definition provides an index to quality of traffic flow in terms of such factors as speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. Six levels of service are defined for each type of facility. They are given letter designations from A to F, with level -of -service (LOS) A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst. V Since the level of service of a traffic facility is a function of the traffic flows placed upon it, such a facility may operate at a wide range of levels of service, depending on the time j� of day, day of week, or period of year. I Unsignalized Intersections CThe levels of service for unsignaiized intersections are determined by application of a procedure described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual.2 The procedure accounts C for lane configuration on both the minor and major approaches, conflicting traffic stream volumes, and type of intersection control (STOP versus YIELD). First, theoretical maximum or capacity flow of vehicles for each minor approach lane is calculated. The capacities are then compared to the demand at the respective minor approaches. The C delay is then estimated based on the relationship between the service rate and the degree of saturation. Table 2-4 summarizes the relationship between level of service and expected delay to minor street traffic. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000): Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2000. �2Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000): Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2000. L 2-8 571-ENF2 Copyright @ 2002 DJK. All rights reserved. TABLE 2-4 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONSa Level Average of Control Delay Service (SecondsNehicle) A 0-10 B >10 - 15 C >15=25 D >25 - 35 E >35 - 50 F >50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, (HCM 2000): Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2000. 2.5.2 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS RESULTS Capacity analyses have been conducted at the study area intersections. Results of this analysis are summarized below by intersection and tabulated in Table 2-5. Route 114 at the Proposed North Site Drive and Sharpner's Pond Road Under 2007 Build with mitigation and development traffic volume conditions, the left- and right -turn exiting movements would operate at LOS D or better and the left -turn entering movement would operate at LOS A. On Sharpner's Pond Road the left and right turns would deteriorate to LOS E. Under Build conditions and without mitigation the LOS would further deteriorate to LOS F. Under 2007 Build conditions with mitigation the LOS would improve to LOS D or better. Mitigation includes the construction of a right -turn lane along Sharpner's Pond Road. Route 114 at the South Site Drive and Industrial Drive Under 2007 Build with development traffic volume conditions, the left- and right -turn exiting movements from Industrial Drive would operate at LOS C or better up through 2007. The left- and right -turns exiting the Proposed South Site Drive would operate at LOS C. The left -turn movements from Route 114 would operate at LOS A. 2-9 571-ENF2 Copyright @ 2002 DJK. All rights reserved. n Li I U n u rl u n Lj J n Li } 0! a U) W U W L. 0 Lf) W N > W J J Z m ao U' W' U) crW z 0 W N a z c9 N z M 7 m OI N V m 0 z r O O N U) 0 M CO O (O M I- V' CA (h — 00 to 00 — W N — 04 — (fl N N 04 00 CA I- O (P) N O O O O O N M 0U OU QQ mm M CO (A (.fl ch � d' O M.- 00 LO —N c- (O N N co CA (l- O)LOOp 00 C; 00 N r r r r oU LL LL QQ mm O O O CO O to LO (O M — — M a-- - 00 — W N ce) M N 46 �t� O� 00 N .- ; NN OO U U 00 Q Q Q Q 0) (o C) C) co LO i i N a-- - i i 00 co co OD n o o co LO 'q!N ; NN OO Wo mm UU O T- N (n LO Cl) N 6 .7 00lM ; ; CV)N i i 00 ; ; LO LO �C� ; NN OO NN i i L d' '' OO Q U m m cc i U m w a h y m y O a 4 (s o a O c a) E 3 a) > >> O� Q o c a) E g E x e=p -c > 0 0 > 0 0 °__ 0 0 o o 4 m 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 m a) v 00 o== y Y y m Y y _= Y Y a) m Z o 2 Y Y y y =_ = y y M y y cc M a) J N a) J C a) CD +"' Q d 0 a) O J C N co -j o d a) 0- ItQ n C 0) 0) 7 a) c c 0) C) C C C O 0) C C r .'�0) C 0) 0) C C 0) 0) 7 C= C C D) O) j C O O) y G 'c c o 'c c o W- ._ o W. e- vl o •c c o .c c 0 W. C C c o C C .0 W w= 4 O> a O> L m O N L U a) w w -0 O> O> L y` N L v) N O 0-G (O� W a)� W 0:3 W o >�W 0 0 (6� W CU� W o �2 W 0:3 W (tZ(0)W Z.� (n F- �� W ZF- CnH c .7 2.6 SIGHT DISTANCE In the vicinity of the proposed project site, Route 114 approaches the Site over a generally level/tangent alignment. Detailed Sight Distance measurements were conducted with respect to the Route 114 approaches to the proposed intersections to identify any potential mitigation measures, which would enhance the available Sight Distance. Sight Distance considerations are basically divided into two criteria: (1) Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) and (2) Intersection Sight Distance (ISD). 2.6.1 STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE (SSD) SSD is the distance required for an approaching vehicle to perceive and react accordingly to an exiting or entering vehicle. The values are based upon a perception and reaction time of 2.5 seconds and a braking distance calculated for wet level pavement. When the roadway is either on an upgrade or downgrade, grade correction factors are applied. 2.6.2 INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE (ISD) ISD is based upon a perception and reaction time and the time required to complete a desired exiting maneuver after the decision to do so has been made. Values for ISD represent the time required to: (1) turn left or right and to accelerate to the operating speed of the street without causing approaching vehicles to reduce speed by more than 70% of the initial speed and (2) upon turning left, or crossing the major roadway, to clear the roadway without causing approaching vehicles to reduce speed by more than 70% of the initial speed. When a grade exists in the roadway or when larger speed reduction values are acceptable, correction factors are applied. SSD is far more important as it represents the minimum distance required for stopping, while the ISD criteria is based only upon acceptable speed reductions to the approaching traffic stream. Table 2-6 compares the measured SSD with the minimum SSD requirements for both the observed vehicle speeds as well as the posted speed limit along Route 114 in the vicinity of the site. As can be seen in Table 2-6, the available SSD exceeds the minimum SSD requirements for the posted speed limit of 45 mph and the observed speed of up to 55 mph. Additionally, the available ISD exceeds the minimum requirement for the Posted Speed of 45 mph as well as the observed speed of 55 mph. 2-11 571-ENF2 Copyright @ 2002 DJK. All rights reserved. r I rl u Li F1 u U) N J Z a. W U Z Fa- �O N = W J y m � Z CL CL O I -- U) LL O Ca CC G C '=M 0 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 Cl) 0 M 0 Cl) 0 Cl) wa E In Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo to Lo to LLf E Ln Ln Lo U Lo Lo vv Lo Lo � Lo v to 0 to O CD CO CO co Co CO Co c U N d C 0 E v v t v v v v v o E d .a ai aO W J o N d r � w cn aC L4) C07 M M M M CD M M m 0 v0- _ •CA E V O CL It d` d• O It :. 41 h i O O O O O O O O J Q q Lo LLo LO Lo too Lo U') Lo V L c CL N d L O LLo W) LL j L Lo Lo to LLf E Ln Ln Lo U Lo Lo vv Lo Lo � Lo v c `n vv vv O N d C 0 E v v t v v v v v o E wLU aO W J o o E�°� r � w d N j CL ' ' ' y- U h i p 0 0 p oar a C d ... L ocu 4 i a) 0) c _� o) c d aQ Q. CC cnt U UL L U Q- U� U C. O3t0S c: O ma -C OOj O1S O ' OC Lto _ H O O Cl O O O O O CLo a -U) 0)QO)0)�W0)am M m CO M M m M co i l3y6 0 y O O O O O O O O co (D o o v� -- + + + + + + + + � I N d L O LLo W) LL j L Lo Lo to LLf .0 Lo to to Ln Lo Ln to Lo Oy £ v v v a v v d v N d C 0 E v v t v v v v v o E aO W J o r � w j CL ' ' ' > h i p 0 0 p oar a C o0) c m a c ocu 4 i a) 0) c _� o) c d aQ Q. CC cnt U UL L U Q- U� U s Lo O3t0S c: O ma -C OOj O1S O ' OC Lto cZ/)X Z�o L � CIO= o :RZ ��o aU "R c � CLC"Z xaz U c co a -U) 0)QO)0)�W0)am U) az 0)0 W�am msaG m� OO 0 a) O Y O U ; a) Y Y O O�O Y Y O V CD O OO C: N O U O r- -ALJ OU O LJ.CJ � L U OU O LJLJ U O U OU 7LJLJ J zC/J Zi > Ui G El 3.0 WETLAND G C I C 1 El C 11 n 571-ENF3 w C C C3.0 WETLAND D III 3.1 Overview The Executive Office of Environmental Affairs MEPA Unit required the Expanded Environmental Notification Form to quantify the wetland impacts of the proposed project. a Consequently, this section identifies all Existing Wetland Resource Areas, Bordering Vegetated Wetlands, Isolated Land Subject to Flooding, Bordering Land Subject to Flooding and the 100 foot Buffer Zone. 3.2 Existing Wetland Resource Areas Inland wetland resource areas delineated on or near the Project site that are subject to protection under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (the Act) include: Bordering Vegetated Wetlands and the associated 100 -foot Buffer Zone and Isolated Land Subject to Flooding (see GSD Associates Existing Conditions Plan, C -1A, C-16, C -1C, dated 11/26/2001, in Attachments 2). There is Bordering Land Subject to Flooding (i.e. 100— year floodplain) estimated on the adjacent parcel also shown on these plans. There are no areas of "Estimated Habitat of Rare Wildlife " or "Certified Vernal Pools" on the subject parcel. Two vernal pools were identified on the site according to local bylaw regulations. 3.3 Bordering Vegetated Wetlands C Bordering vegetated wetlands (BVWs) are freshwater wetlands that border on creeks, rivers, streams, ponds and lakes. The types of freshwater wetlands are wet meadows, marshes, swamps and bogs. They are areas where the topography is low and flat, and where the soils are annually saturated. The boundary of BVWs is the line within which 50 percent or more of the plant community consists of the wetland plant species identified in the Act and the soils meet the criteria set forth in the Filed Indicators for C 3-1 571-ENF3 C C Identifying Hydric dric Soils in New England, Version 2, 1998 NEIWPCC Wetlands Working Y Group. BVW isP resumed significant to flood control, storm damage prevention, pollution attenuation, wildlife habitat, fisheries habitat, protection of public and private water supply, and protection of groundwater supply. Under the Act, there is a 100 -foot buffer zone associated with BVW. BVWs and isolated vegetated wetlands (IVWs) were delineated and flagged on the project site by West Environmental, Inc. from December 2002 to March 2002 in accordance with the DEP handbook "Delineating Bordering Vegetated Wetlands Under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act" (DEP, 1995) and US Army Corps of Engineers "Wetland Delineation Manual' (ACOE, 1987). The wetland resource areas have been depicted on the above referenced Existing Conditions Plans. 3.4 Isolated Land Subiect to Flooding Isolated Land Subject to Flooding is an isolated depression or closed catch basin without an inlet or an outlet. It is an area which, at least once per year, confines standing water to a volume of at least 1/4 acre feet and to an average depth of at least six (6) inches. Under the Act Isolated Land Subject to Flooding is presumed significant to flood control, storm damage prevention, pollution attenuation, wildlife habitat, protection of public and private water supply, and protection of groundwater supply. There is one area of Isolated Land Subject to Flooding identified on the above referenced Existing Conditions Plans. a3.5 100 -Foot Buffer Zone A Buffer Zone is the area of land extending 100 -feet horizontally outward from the boundary of the following state wetland resource areas: • Bordering Vegetated Wetlands; a • Bank, Beach, Marsh, Wet Meadow, Bog or Swamp; • Land under any creek, River, Stream, Pond or Lake. The Buffer Zone is not regulated as a wetland resource under the Act, rather it is the issuing authority's limit of jurisdiction. Isolated vegetated wetlands protected under the US Clean Water Act do not have a buffer zone associated with them. The 100 -foot a buffer zone extends from each delineated BVW flag series. It has been depicted on the above referenced Existing Conditions Plan, GSD Associates. Isolated Vegetated Wetlands are areas that fall under federal and local jurisdiction but are not subject to protection under the Act. There are three small areas that fit this description on the site. C Ell 3-2 571-ENF3 C C 3.6 Regulatory Overview and Summary of Wetland Impacts The proponent has filed for a comprehensive permit under G.L.c.40B and pursuant to the procedures prescribed by 760 CMR 30.00 and 31.00 has requested waivers of C several local laws from the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), including a waiver of the provisions of the North Andover Wetland Protection Bylaw. However, the proponent will not locate any buildings within twenty-five (25) feet of the wetland resource boundaries. The Project proposed no permanent impacts to wetland resource areas but there will be 225 square feet of temporary impact to Bordering Vegetated Wetlands to upgrade an existing culvert crossing and there will be impacts in the 100 -foot Buffer Zone of Bordering Vegetated Wetlands. As a result, a Notice of Intent application prepared in accordance with the state Act, will be filed with the North Andover Conservation Commission concurrent with this filing. These state and federal regulations have varying but similar, performance standards requiring that projects be designed to avoid or minimize and mitigate wetlands to the best extent practicable. C i III III I 1 571-ENF3 E! 3-3 E4.0 DRAINAGE I i 1 C C C M E571-ENF4 C 11 C 4.0 DRAINAGE 4.0 DRAINAGE L' 4.1 Existina Conditions L� The proposed development is located at 2357 Turnpike Street in North Andover, LI Massachusetts. The 47 -acre site is bordered to the north by commercial and residential properties, to the east by Route 114 and to the south and west by wetlands and the a undeveloped, wooded Harold Parker State Forest, owned by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Project Plans show the development divided into two phases; the "Upper Meadows" and the "Lower Meadows". The Upper Meadows consists of the higher land between Route 114 and include the eastern portion of an open field in the middle of the property. n The Lower Meadows consist of the open field and surrounding wetlands and a wooded uarea along the western portion of the Site. The easterly part of the Upper Meadows is occupied by an animal shelter facility that consists of five, one-story structures and the primary residence of the landowner. The westerly part is an open area that slopes steeply toward the Lower Meadows. Previous subsurface investigations revealed that construction debris fill had been placed near the C western side of the Upper Meadows. The construction debris has been covered over by soil. The easterly part of the Lower Meadows consists of an open field with bedrock outcrops which abut extensive wetlands. Most of this field is underlain by construction debris fill and covered over by topsoil. The westerly part appears to be virgin wooded land not subject to past filling or modification. Numerous bedrock outcrops are visible throughout the west portion of the Lower Meadows. 4-1 577-ENF4 C C C C C D 4.2 Proposed Development In general, development would consist of twenty-seven residential buildings (building footprints total 4.22 acres) with associated parking and utilities. Five detention basins are proposed as part of the storm water management design. Because there are jurisdictional wetland resource areas on the project site, the proposed development is subject to the DEP's Stormwater Management Policy. The proposed development is shown on the plans entitled "The Meadows Condominiums - Application for Permit from Zoning Board of Appeals — Under M.G.L. Chapter 4013" dated June 3, 2002. 4.3 Hydrologic/Hydraulic Analysis A hydrologic and hydraulic analysis was performed by GZA to evaluate the rainfall/runoff characteristics for the site in both the pre- and post -developed conditions. Storm events with a recurrence interval of 2, 10, and 100 -years were analyzed. Rainfall volumes used for this analysis were based on the SCS Type III, 24-hour storm event, corresponding to 3.1, 4.5, and 6.4 inches, respectively. Runoff coefficients were estimated using SCS Technical Release 55 (TR -55) methodology. Soil hydrologic group information was obtained from the SCS Soil Survey for Essex County, Northern Part, issued November, 1981. Inflow hydrographs were established and routed through proposed hydraulic structures using the Corps of Engineers (COE) HEC -1 Flood Hydrograph Package. Pre -developed conditions Based on its topographical and drainage characteristics, the Site area was divided into three sub -basins under pre -developed conditions: the eastern uplands, the central meadows, and the western uplands, as shown on Figures C-1 A, C-113, and CAC respectively. Post -developed conditions Under post -developed conditions, GZA divided the site area into seven sub -areas, �__ aL J •a J ice.. a Runoff r__.Y c aV_ �. based on he proposed site grading and drainage layout. Runoll 11Uorn six of the sub- areas will discharge to five different proposed stormwater detention basins. The a remaining sub -area discharges directly into the adjacent wetlands. The proposed stormwater detention ponds were sized to provide flow attenuation of the 2 -year and 10 - year storms, so to maintain the total pre -development peak rate of runoff emanating from a the site. Additional attenuation was provided within the stormwater detention ponds to compensate for higher post -development peak flows originating from the one uncontrolled sub -area. A post -development hydrograph for the site was also generated for the 100 -year storm. The stormwater detention ponds were sized to safety pass the peak post -development a discharge rates. Some additional attenuation is provided by the detention ponds, as they are designed, under the 100 -year design storm condition. Our analysis demonstrates that downstream flooding will not be appreciably altered by the proposed development during the 100 -year storm. CA summary of pre- and post -development hydrologic and hydraulic calculations are included in the Appendices. j� 4-2 L571-ENF4 C C4.4 Applicable Stormwater Regulations and Permitting Required The following stormwater related regulations and guidelines apply to the proposed development: . Massachusetts State Stormwater Management Performance Standards and Guidelines, Department of Environmental Protection and Office of Coastal Zone Management (DEP/CZM, March 1997). i F1 C C D C C C C C I Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Permit for Construction Activities disturbing greater than five acres (EPA), Federal Register, December 8, 1999). 4.5 Compliance with DEP Stormwater Management Guidelines The methods for compliance with the nine stormwater performance standards developed by the DEP are summarized below: 1. No new stormwater conveyances may discharge untreated stormwater directly to or cause erosion in wetlands or waters of the Commonwealth. Stormwater from the developed site will be treated before leaving the site, using catch basins with sumps and hoods, stormwater detention ponds and hydrodynamic separators (e.g., Stormceptor devices) at selected locations. Outlet protection will be provided at all stormwater outlets to the adjacent wetlands. 2. Stormwater management systems must be designed so that post -development discharge rates do not exceed pre -development discharge rates. Comparing existing and proposed conditions, cumulative peak discharges from the Site for the 2 -year and 10 -year storms do not increase. For 100 -year discharge from the site, there is an increase of 22 cfs. Our analysis of downstream flooding indicates no measurable impact because of the size of the wetlands which surround the Site. 3. Loss of annual recharge to groundwater should be minimized through the use of infiltration measures to the maximum extent practicable. The annual recharge from the post -development site should approximate the annual recharge from the pre - development site conditions based on soil type. High groundwater, the presence of shallow bedrock and the thinness and low permeability of the natural overburden soils do not allow for effective infiltration. For environmental considerations, GZA does not recommend infiltration through the construction debris fill. 4. For new development, stormwater management systems must be designed to remove 80 -percent of the average annual load (post development conditions) of Total Suspended Solids (TSS). It is presumed that this standard is met when: Suitable non-structural practices for source control and pollution prevention are implemented; 4-3 571-ENF4 C• Stormwater management best management practices (BMPs) are sized to capture the prescribed runoff volume; and EI • Stormwater management BMPs are maintained as designed. The stormwater management plan will utilize a number of structural and non - C structural BMPs to meet this standard. Catch basins with hoods and deep sumps will be utilized in the storm drainage network. Stormwater from 80 -percent of the site will be routed through stormwater detention ponds designed to provide 24-hour C detention of the 2 -year and 10 -year storms. The remainder of the site runoff will be treated using hydrodynamic separators (e.g. Stormceptor), appropriately sized to achieve 80 -percent TSS removal. 5. Stormwater discharges to areas with higher pollutant loads require the use of specific stormwater management BMPs (listed in guidelines). The use of infiltration practices without pretreatment is prohibited. No areas with higher potential pollutant loads (as listed in the Stormwater Management Standards) will be located on the Site as developed. 6. Stormwater discharges to critical areas must utilize certain stormwater management BMPs approved for critical areas (listed in guidelines). Critical areas are Outstanding C Resources Waters (ORWs), shellfish beds, swimming beaches, cold water fisheries, and recharge areas for public water supplies. CThe site does not contain critical areas as defined in the policy. 6. Redevelopment of previously developed sites must meet the Stormwater Management Standards to the maximum extent practicable. However, if it is C practicable to meet all the Standards, new (retrofitted or expanded) stormwater management systems must be designed to improve existing conditions. The proposed site development is a new development. 7. Erosion and sediment controls must be implemented to prevent impacts during construction and land disturbance activities (discussed below). Erosion and sediment controls will be implemented to prevent indirect impacts to adowngradient areas. 8. All stormwater management systems must have an operation and maintenance plan Cto ensure that systems function as designed. A stormwater operation and maintenance plan has been prepared for the project and Cis summarized in section 4.8 below. I 4.6 Federal NPDES Program The project will result in disturbance of more than one acre of land, and therefore is subject to compliance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) administered by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The (, Proponent and its site contractor are responsible for complying with the NPDES General 4-4 571-ENF4 C C 71 a Permit Program for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Sites. A Notice of Intent (NOI) under NPDES will be filed before site preparation begins. The requirements under the NPDES program include the preparation and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) by the Proponent and contractor. The SWPPP will include a description of the project site, a description of the erosion and sediment control measures to be used on the site, and a description of the maintenance and inspection procedures. An outline of the SWPPP is provided below. The SWPPP will be available for inspection on the construction site and will be updated as maintenance and inspections are performed. 4.7 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan The following erosion and sedimentation control techniques will be employed to minimize erosion and transport of sediment to resource areas during the earthwork and construction phases of the project. Site Clearinq During the site clearing stage, existing vegetation within the overall limits of the work area will be cleared and removed. Prior to any site clearing activities, silt fence and hay bale barriers will be placed around the downgradient outer work perimeter. Trees to be C preserved on the site will be clearly protected with appropriate fencing. Clearing will be limited to those areas necessary to complete the proposed work. Disturbed areas will be kept to a minimum. Hay Bale/Silt Fence Barriers Hay bale/silt fence barriers will be placed to trap sediment transported by runoff before it reaches the drainage system, leaves the construction site, or enters the adjacent wetlands, in addition to areas where high runoff velocities or high sediment loads are expected. The site fences and hay bale barrier will be replaced as determined by periodic field inspections. Catch Basin Protection Li Newly constructed catch basins will be protected with hay bale barriers (where appropriate) or silt sacks throughout construction. Construction Site Entrance To reduce the tracking of sediment from the construction site onto public ways, a stabilized construction entrance shall be established at all permanent construction staging areas. The entrance shall include a 2- to 3 -inch thick pad of crushed stone C underlain with a filter cloth or a bituminous concrete apron and shall be constructed on level ground. The reduction of trackout sediments and other pollutants onto paved roads shall minimize the release of sediment off-site and the production of airborne dust. Slope Protection Exposed slopes are especially susceptible to erosion. Slope protection will be provided using silt fence/hay bale installations as shown in the applicable detail on Drawing C-1 D. C4-5 571-ENF4 C If this erosion and sedimentation control method is ineffective, then the Contractor shall consider installing matting (as shown in the applicable detail on Drawing C-1 D). Matting C is available from many different materials, such as straw, jute, wood fiber, and plastic netting. Matting provides cushioning against splash erosion from raindrop impact, does not generate high velocity runoff, captures a great deal of sediment, and can provide long-term protection, based on matting selection. Temporary Sediment Basins Temporary sediment basins will be designed either as excavations or bermed stormwater detention structures (depending on grading) that will retain runoff for a sufficient period of time to allow suspended soil particles to settle out prior to discharge. These temporary basins will be located based on construction needs as determined by the contractor. A perforated riser surrounded by a crushed stone filter is typically used to control discharge from the basin. Points of discharge from sediment basins will be astabilized to minimize erosion. Stockpiled Materials DStockpiles created during construction activities shall be surrounded with hay bales and silt fence, where possible. Other alternatives include curb inlet filters or gravel filter berms laid around the perimeter of the stockpile. Stockpiles shall be covered prior to inclement weather, graded to shed water, and covered at the end of each work day with a minimum of 20 -mil black polyethylene. aVegetative Slope Stabilization a Stabilization of open slope surfaces will be implemented within 14 days after grading or construction activities have temporarily or permanently ceased. Vegetative slope stabilization will be used to minimize erosion on slopes of 3:1 or flatter. Establishment of temporary and permanent vegetative cover may be established by hydro -seeding or sodding. Mulch will be used after permanent seeding to protect soil from the impact of falling rain and to increase the capacity of ti ie soil to absorb water. LJ Winter Stabilization LJ Any areas disturbed at any phase of on-site activity conducted during winter conditions a will be temporarily stabilized with hand laid straw mulch, hydro -seeding, mulching, or erosion control blankets as necessary to control erosion during winter storm events. aOutlet Protection Appropriate outlet protection, consisting of rip -rap channel lining, will be provided at each stormwater outlet to reduce stormwater velocities and enhance sedimentation prior to discharge to the adjacent wetlands. Oak Mattinq aOak matting will be used as a stabilized platform during the temporary construction activities in the adjacent wetlands, which are limited to retaining wall construction and a C4-6 571-ENF4 C C the culvert replacement. Oak mats reduce overall tracking from construction sites, and acreate a stable pad for heavy equipment. Inspection and Maintenance a Inspection and maintenance ensure that the BMPs installed on-site have been installed correctly and are .still effective. Routine inspection and maintenance can reduce the chance of polluting storm water by finding and correcting problems before the next rain event. Inspections of the active work area should occur weekly and after every significant precipitation event (exceeding'/ -inch precipitation). The focus of the inspection is to determine: whether or not the measure was installed/performed correctly; whether or not there has been damage to the measure since it was installed or performed; and what should be done to correct any problems a with the measure. Each BMP should be observed to determine if it is still effective. In some cases, specific measurements may be taken to determine if maintenance of the BMPs are required. For example, sediment depths may be measured to determine if cleaning or replacement is required. CIn addition to the aforementioned inspection and maintenance procedures, the Contractor should keep a record of the following information: • The dates when major grading activities occur in a particular area; The dates when construction activities cease in an area, temporarily or permanently; C and • The dates when an area is stabilized, temporarily or permanently. 4.8 Operations and Maintenance Program COperations and maintenance of erosion control measures help to insure that the Systems In place will wul.K as eIIII:IGIIuy as p^vSSibIG. 1 IIG IvnoVving maintenance program is typical for a project to ensure the continued effectiveness of the structural water Cquality controls: • Mow stormwater basin side slopes and bottom once annually to discourage the agrowth of woody plants. • Inspect and remove accumulated sediment and debris from the sediment traps and forebays four times annually, or more frequently as needed (two sweepings should occur in spring and fall). C • Sweep paved areas completely at least four times per year (two sweepings should occur in spring and fall). • Minimize the use of road salt for the maintenance of parking areas and roads during the winter. C 4-7 571-ENF4 C c� Do not stockpile snow within the buffer zone to adjacent wetlands; stockpile within paved parking areas to drain to on-site catch basins to provide treatment before discharge. If necessary, the plowed snow will be removed from the parking lots. No disposal of materials will be permitted within the buffer zone on the project site. This prohibition applies to trash, fill material, construction debris, grass clippings, collected leaves, and cut branches. L� . All drainage inlets and outlets will be kept free from leaves, silt, and debris that would {� prevent the free flow of surface water into, through, and out of them as designed or cause the drainage area to accumulate surface water in excess of its design. a. Grassy areas will be stabilized and maintained, especially along vegetated side slopes, to control erosion. Problem areas will be reseeded immediately or protected with erosion control matting as necessary to stabilize exposed soils. Reporting and Documentation The Site Manager shall be responsible for maintaining an accurate Site Maintenance Log. The Site Maintenance Log shall: 1. Document the completion of planned maintenance tasks. 2. Identify the person responsible for the completion of tasks. 3. Identify any outstanding problems, malfunctions, or inconsistencies identified during athe course of routine maintenance. The Site Manager shall be responsible for ensuring that the scheduled tasks are C appropriately completed as described in this Plan and the Site Maintenance Log accurately represents activities carried out as described in this Plan. CMaintenance Loq A Olte MaI ltel lal1U: Log stall be completed as described above, and stall, at a include the following items: Cminimum, Date activity performed Specific maintenance task Structural components maintained • Staff person or contractor performing activity •Supervisor verification of maintenance activity 0 Recommended additional maintenance tasks C C G E 4-8 571-ENF4 C C C C t El C C 5.0 WASTEWATER 571-ENF5 C 0 5.0 WASTEWATER C G a5.0 WASTEWATER 5.1 Overview LJ The Executive Office of Environmental Affair, MEPA Unit required the Expanded Environmental Notification Form to quantify the wastewater impacts of the proposed project, including estimates of wastewater generation. In addition it should describe the proposed methods of wastewater management, including all necessary infrastructure and any mitigation for wastewater impacts deemed necessary. The expanded ENF C must also demonstrate that the Greater Lawrence Sanitation District wastewater treatment facility has adequate capacity to accommodate the increased wastewater flows from this project. 5.2 Wastewater Evaluation As currently designed, the Project will generate approximately 63,030 gpd of wastewater. The project proposes construction of approximately 1.5 miles of new sewer main, the majority of which will be constructed along Route 114 form the proposed Site to the existing pumping station at Palamino Drive. Wastewater generated by the Project will be collected by gravity at a pump station located near the middle of the site (see Figure C2 -B). Flows from the station will be pumped through a force main and will discharge to a pump station located adjacent to the site on Route 114 near the Middleton Town line. From this point, wastewater will be conveyed by forced main and gravity sewer into the municipal pumping station at Palamino Drive and eventually to the Greater Lawrence Sanitation District's Wastewater Treatment Plant. 5.3 Capacity COn August 12, 2002, NADPW Engineers Robert Besmara and Tim Willett confirmed that there is adequate capacity at the treatment plan to handle the above stated flow. The Town of North Andover will own and operate the proposed pump stations upon satisfactory completion of construction activities x 5-1 571-ENF5 C u C C w c C C c i i C C 5.4 Mitigation Measures and Conclusions Project engineers will provide the results of GZA's hydrologic analysis to the NADPW demonstrating that the wastewater flows from the Project can be adequately conveyed through the downstream sewer collection and treatment facilities. The proponent will install flow restrictors to plumbing fixtures in each residential dwelling unit. 5-2 571-ENFS C EAPPENDIX A. TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA El El 11 C C G C i El 571-ENF-A C DS: Turnpike Street (Route 114) I -/Sharpner's Pond Road City, State: North Andover, MA Flient: DJK/D. Kelly r®C Transportation Data Corporation 12 Walnut Street, #9 Natick, MA 01760 Office: 508-651-1610 Fax: 508-651-1229 File Name :01873A Site Code : 00000571 Start Date : 02/05/2002 Page No : 1 996 280 Volume 0 255 2 0 2571 16 0 9 0 25 2 278 0 0 280 Peak Factor 0.921 0.850' 0.889 aTurnpike(Route 114) Out Out In Toho 1022 947 1969 934 13-] 0 a i LAPeds 0 OV `J r North m Y2002 7:15:00 AM A - 8:00:00 AM N 0 cars Trucks 5j I� m LJI CII T r+ I Thru Ri M Peds 1 9791 171 0 i I I ® I 966I 1972 Out In Toff Twnpike Slreet outs 114 C C Int Total 2028 560 0.905 Tumpike Street (Route 114) Sharpness Pond Road Tumpike Street (Route 11� From North From East From South Start Time Right Thru Left Peds ��' Right Thru Left Peds T Right ThN Left Peds .k Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:15 AM !� Volume 0 934 13 0 9471 43 0 42 0 85 17 979 0 0 Percent 0.0 98.6 1.4 0.0 50.6 0.0 49.4 0.0 1.7 98.3 0.0 0.0 07:30 Volume 0 255 2 0 257 11 0 12 0 23 I 2 278 0 0 Peak Factor i High Int 07:30 AM 108:00 AM 107:30 AM 996 280 Volume 0 255 2 0 2571 16 0 9 0 25 2 278 0 0 280 Peak Factor 0.921 0.850' 0.889 aTurnpike(Route 114) Out Out In Toho 1022 947 1969 934 13-] 0 a i LAPeds 0 OV `J r North m Y2002 7:15:00 AM A - 8:00:00 AM N 0 cars Trucks 5j I� m LJI CII T r+ I Thru Ri M Peds 1 9791 171 0 i I I ® I 966I 1972 Out In Toff Twnpike Slreet outs 114 C C Int Total 2028 560 0.905 E } /S: Turnpike Street (Route 114) Sharpnei s Pond Road City, State: North Andover, MA F- hent: DJK/D. Kelly TDC Transportation Data Corporation 12 Walnut Street, #9 Natick, MA 01760 Office: 508-6514610 Fax: 508-651-1229 (;mons PrintPA- Cars - Tnrdcs File Name :01873A Site Code : 00000571 Start Date : 02/05/2002 Page No : 1 Grand Total 0 1779 33 0 I 82 0 87 0 48 Apprch % 0.0 98.2 1.8 0.0 .5 0.0 51.5 0.0 Total % 0.0 45.8 0.8 0.0 2.1 0.0 2.2 0.0 Tumpike Street (Route 114) From East OI Sharpness Pond Road Turnpike Street (Route 114) Turnpike Street (Route 114) Thru Left Peds App' Total From North 0.0 0.0 From East Right Thru Left I From South App" Total Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM Start Time Right Thru I Left Peds Right I fhr-u7 Left I Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int Total 07:00 AM 0 238 3 0 9 0 12 0 5 185 0 0 452 07:15 AM 0 247 1 0 I 8 0 12 0 6 217 0 0 491 07:30 AM 0 255 2 0 11 0 12 0 2 278 0 0 560 07:45 AM 0 222 7 01 8 0 9 0 3 238 0 01 487 LI Total 0 962 13 01 36 0 45 01 16 918 0 01 1990 08:00 AM 0 210 3 0 16 0 9 0' 6 246 0 01 490 08:15 AM 0 218 8 0 11 0 14 0 8 223 0 0 482 08:30 AM 0 195 3 0 9 0 10 0 7 258 0 01 482 08:45 AM 0 194 6 0 10 0 9 0 6 216 0 01 441 Total 0 817 20 0 46 0 42 0 27 943 0 01 1895 Grand Total 0 1779 33 0 I 82 0 87 0 48 Apprch % 0.0 98.2 1.8 0.0 .5 0.0 51.5 0.0 Total % 0.0 45.8 0.8 0.0 2.1 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.850 43 1861 From East OI 3885 Turnpike Street (Route 114) Thru Left Peds App' Total From North 0.0 0.0 Start Time Right Thru Left I Peds App" Total Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 0.0 Left 11 01 Intersection 07:15 AM 23 8:00 AM 0 9961 2028 Volume 0 934 13 0 947 25 2 Percent 0.0 98.6 1.4 0.0 560 07:30 Volume 0 255 2 0 257 7:30 AM Peak Factor 2 278 0 0 High Int 07:30 AM 0.889 Volume 0 255 2 0 257 Peak Factor 0.921 C C C 0.850 43 1861 From East OI 3885 Rght Thru Left Peds App' Total 0.0 0.0 43 0 42 0 85 50.6 0.0 49.4 0.0 Left 11 01 12 0 23 8:00 AM 0 9961 2028 1.7 16 0 9 0 25 0.850 43 1861 0 OI 3885 2.3 97.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 47.9 0.0 0.0 Turnpike Sheet(Route 114) From South Right Thru Left Peds Tpa- Int Total 17 979 0 0 9961 2028 1.7 98.3 0.0 0.0 2 278 0 0 280 560 0.905 7:30 AM 2 278 0 0 280 0.889 C D/S: Turnpike Street (Route 114) : Sharpner s Pond Road City, State: North Andover, MA (client: DJK/D. Kelly Start Time Right I Thru I Left 07:00 AM 0 238 3 07:15 AM 0 246 1 07:30 AM 0 251 2 07:45 AM 0 221 7 Total 0 956 13 08:00 AM 0 209 3 08:15 AM 0 212 7 08:30 AM 0 188 3 08:45 AM 0 191 6 TDC Transportation Data Corporation 12 Walnut Street, #9 Natick, MA 01760 Office: 508-651-1610 Fax:508-651-1229 LJ Groups Printed- Cars 800 19 0 41 Sharpness Pond Road 0 39 01 From East Grand Total 0 1756 eds Right Thru Left Peds 0 8 0 11 0 0 8 0 12 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 7 0 7 0 01 34 0 41 0 0 15 0 9 0 0 10 0 13 0 0 8 0 10 0 0 8 0 7 0 LJ Total 0 800 19 0 41 447 0 39 01 0 Grand Total 0 1756 32 0 75 0 80 0 550 3 % 0.0 98.2 1.8 0.0 ( 48.4 476 0.0 51.6 0.0 0 CApprch Total % 0.0 46.2 0.8 0.0 2.0 0 0.0 2.1 0.0 7 213 0 0 462 Turnpike Street (Route 114) 246 Sharpness Pond Road 0 462 6 212 From North 0 0 430 From East 911 0 0 Start Time Right Thru Lett Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 1.1 47.7 0.0 0.0 Intersection 07:15 AM Tumpike Stmt (Route 114) From South C Volume 0 927 13 0 940 41 0 39 0 80 Percent 0.0 98.6 1.4 0.0 . 51.3 0.0 48.8 0.0 07:30 Volume 0 251 2 0 253 11 0 11 0 22 0.0 0.0 Peak Factor 2 108:00 0 0 275 550 C High Int 07:30 AM 0.907 r:30 AM AM 2 273 0 Volume 0 251 2 0 253 15 0 9 0 24 Peak Factor 0.929 0.833 E C � LJ �II C C File Name :01873A Site Code : 00000571 Start Date : 02/05/2002 Page No : 1 5 182 0 0 447 6 216 0 0 489 2 273 0 0 550 3 231 0 0 476 16 902 0 0 1962 5 240 0 0 481 7 213 0 0 462 7 246 0 0 462 6 212 0 0 430 25 911 0 0 1835 41 1813 0 0 3791 2.2 97.8 0.0 0.0 1.1 47.7 0.0 0.0 Tumpike Stmt (Route 114) From South Right Thru Lett Peds App. Int Total . 16 960 0 0 976 1996 1.6 98.4 0.0 0.0 2 273 0 0 275 550 0.907 r:30 AM 2 273 0 0 275 0.887 E roc Transportation Data Corporation 12 Walnut Street, #9 Natick, MA 01760 N/S: Turnpike Street (Route 114) OfFce:508-651-1610 Fax: 508-651-1229 EE: Sharpner's Pond Road City, State: North Andover, MA I Client: DJK/D. Kelly Groups Printed- Trucks File Name : 01873A Site Code : 00000571 Start Date : 02/05/2002 Page No : 1 08:00 AM 0 1 0 01 1 0 0 0' 1 6 0 0 9 08:15 AM 0 6 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 10 0 0 20 Turnpike Street (Route 114) 7 0 Sharpness Pond Road 1 Turnpike Street (Route 114) 0 0 iFrom North 12 From East 0 From South 08:45 AM 0 Start TimeR' ht Thru Left I Peds I Right Thru ' Left I Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0{ 1 0 1 0 I 0 3 0 0 5 07:15 AM 0 1 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 07:30 AM 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 10 07:45 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 7 0 01 11 Total 0 6 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 16 0 01 28 08:00 AM 0 1 0 01 1 0 0 0' 1 6 0 0 9 08:15 AM 0 6 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 10 0 0 20 08:30 AM 0 7 0 01 1 0 0 01 0 12 0 0 20 08:45 AM 0 3 0 01 2 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 11 Total 0 17 1 01 5 0 3 01 2 32 0 01 60 Grand Total 0 23 1 01 7 0 7 0 2 48 0 0 88 Apprch % 0.0 95.8 4.2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 I 4.0 96.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 26.1 1.1 0.0 8.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 2.3 54.5 0.0 0.0 Turnpike Street (Route 114) Sharpness Pond Road Turnpike Street (Route 114) From North East From South From Start Time Right Thru Left Peds' AppFrom TotalD Right Thru Left Peds App. R�ht Thru Left Peds Total Int Total Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:45 AM Intersection Volume 0 15 1 0 16 4 0 3 0 7 2 35 0 0 37 60 Percent 0.0 93.8 6.3 0.0 57.1 0.0 42.9 0.0 5.4 94.6 0.0 0.0 08:30 Volume 0 7 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 12 0 0 12 20 Ell Peak Factor High Int 08:15 AM 07:45 AM 08:30 AM 0.750 Volume 0 6 1 0 7 1 0 2 0 3 0 12 0 0 12 Peak Factor 0.571 1 0.583 0.771 E E C i C TDC Transportation Data Corporation Turnpike Street (Route 114) 12 Walnut Street, #9 Natick, Ma onso Office: 508-651-1610 Fax: 508-651-1229 D.tatpner's Pond Road City, State: North Andover, MA 11 hent: DJK/D. Kelly h _ 5/ File Name : 01873AA Site Code : 00000571 Start Date : 02/05/2002 Page No : 1 Tumpike Sheet (Route 114) From East Right Thru From North Peds Thor Start Time Right Thru Left 0 Peds App' Total eak Hour F. 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 21 0 Intersection 04:45 PM 53 !, 39.6 0.0 Volume 0 804 28 0 832 Percent 0.0 96.6 3.4 0.0 0.954 05:15 Volume 0 199 8 0 207 Peak Factor 0 16 0 270, 0.905 High Int. 05:00 PM 0.828 Volume 0 211 7 0 218 Peak Factor 0.954 h _ 5/ File Name : 01873AA Site Code : 00000571 Start Date : 02/05/2002 Page No : 1 Tumpike Street (Route 114) From South From East Right Thru Right Peds Thor Left Peds App" Total 0 0 9771 1862 1.7 21 0 32 0 53 !, 39.6 0.0 60.4 0.0 270 5 0 6 0 11 4:45 PM 0.954 5:15 PM 9 0 7 0 16 0 270, 0.905 0.828 h _ 5/ File Name : 01873AA Site Code : 00000571 Start Date : 02/05/2002 Page No : 1 Turnpike outs 114) Out In Tota I 981 832 1813 i 8041 281 0 Thru Left Peds 1 �► T t -IN p S North N jr (p 002445:00 PM I �° W rn - 00D2 530:00 PMcars ro W Trucks 0 o o_ T r Thru fWt Peds 960 17 0 977 1813 Out h Total Tum ike Street Rarte 114 Tumpike Street (Route 114) From South Right Thru Left Peds To. Int Total 17 960 0 0 9771 1862 1.7 98.3 0.0 0.0 1 269 0 0 270 488 0.954 5:15 PM 1 269 0 0 270, 0.905 Turnpike outs 114) Out In Tota I 981 832 1813 i 8041 281 0 Thru Left Peds 1 �► T t -IN p S North N jr (p 002445:00 PM I �° W rn - 00D2 530:00 PMcars ro W Trucks 0 o o_ T r Thru fWt Peds 960 17 0 977 1813 Out h Total Tum ike Street Rarte 114 E /S: Turnpike Street (Route 114) ;E: Sharpner's Pond Road City, State: North Andover, MA Client: DJK/D. Kelly TDC Transportation Data Corporation 12 Walnut Street, #9 Natick, MA 01760 Office: 508-651-16 10 Fax. 508-651-1229 r:mmc Printpd- rm - Tnw-ks File Name : 01873AA Site Code : 00000571 Start Date : 02/05/2002 Page No : 1 Grand Total 0 Tumpike Street (Route 114) 54 0 Sharpner's Pond Road Turnpike Street (Route 114) I 49 0 36 1757 0 From North 3435 From East 96.5 3.5 0.0 From South 0.0 53.8 0.0 I Start Time ht I Thru I Left Peds Right I Thru Left Peds Righfr7l$mT 0.0 Left I Peds Int Total 1.4 04:00 PM 0 155 6 0 5 0 7 0 5 179 0 0 357 C 04:15 PM 0 175 5 0I 4 0 3 0 3 198 0 0 388 04:30 PM 0 182 9 0 5 0 3 0 8 195 0 0 402 Right 04:45 PM 0 196 3 0 9 0 7 0 1 218 0 01 434 Left Total 0 708 23 01 23 0 20 0. 17 790 0 01 1581 05:00 PM 0 211 7 0 5 0 11 0 4 219 0 0 457 05:15 PM 0 199 8 0 I 5 0 6 0 1 269 0 0 488 960 05:30 PM 0 198 10 0 2 0 8 0 11 254 0 0 483 98.3 05:45 PM 0 181 6 0 7 0 4 0 3 225 0 0 426 269 Total 0 789 31 0 19 0 29 0 19 967 0 01 1854 Grand Total 0 1497 54 0 42 0 49 0 36 1757 0 01 3435 Apprch % 0.0 96.5 3.5 0.0 46.2 I 0.0 53.8 0.0 I 2.0 98.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 43.6 1.6 0.0 1.2 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.0 51.1 0.0 0.0 Turnpike Street (Route 114) Sharpness Pond Road Turnpike Street (Route 114) D From North From East From South Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds APP' Total Int Total Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 intersection 04:45 PM D Volume 0 804 28 0 832 21 0 32 0 531 17 960 0 0 977 1862 Percent 0.0 96.6 3.4 0.0 39.6 0.0 60.4 0.0 1.7 98.3 0.0 0.0 05:15 Volume 0 199 8 0 207 5 0 6 0 11 1 269 0 0 270 488 D Peak Factor High Int. 05:00 PM 04:45 PM 05:15 PM 10.954 Volume 0 211 7 0 218 9 0 7 0 16 1 269 0 0 270 Peak Factor 0.954 0.828 0.905 D D C C C �D C� D D C /S: Turnpike Street (Route 114) Sharpner s Pond Road City, State: North Andover, MA r1ent: DJK/D. Kelly TDC Transportation Data Corporation 12 Walnut Street, #9 Natick, MA 01760 Office: 508-651-16 10 Fax: 508-651-1229 File Name : 01 873A Site Code : 00000571 Start Date : 02/05/2002 Page No : 1 3383 Int Total 1835 482 1"952 Grand Total 0 Tumpike Street (Route 114) 54 01 Sharpness Pond Road Tumpike Street (Route 114) 47 01 36 1737 0 From Nath Apprch % 0.0 96.5 From East 0.0 46"0 From South 54.0 0.0 l 2.0 98.0 Start Time R' it F Th-ru-F Left I Peds Right Thru Left Peds R" ht Thru Left Peds Int Total 0.0 04:00 PM 0 151 6 0 4 0 7 0 5 174 0 0} 347 04:15 PM 0 170 5 0 4 0 3 0 3 197 0 01 382 04:30 PM 0 178 9 0 I 5 0 3 0 8 193 0 01 396 TPp. 04:45 PM 0 196 3 0 8 0 7 0 1 215 0 01 430 0 695 23 0 21 0 20 01 17 779 0 01 1555 CTotal 05:00 PM 0 206 7 0 5 0 10 0+ 4 216 0 0 448 0 05:15 PM 0 194 8 0 5 0 6 0 1 268 0 0 I 482 0.0 05:30 PM 0 194 10 0 2 0 7 0 11 251 0 0 475 202 I 05:45 PM 0 180 6 01 7 0 4 0 3 223 0 0 423 04:45 PM Total 0 774 31 01 19 0 27 0 19 958 0 0 1828 3383 Int Total 1835 482 1"952 Grand Total 0 1469 54 01 40 0 47 01 36 1737 0 0 Apprch % 0.0 96.5 3.5 0.0 46"0 0.0 54.0 0.0 l 2.0 98.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 43.4 1.6 0.0 I 1.2 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.1 51.3 0.0 0.0 Tumpike Street (Route 114) Sharpnees Pond Road Tumpike Sheet (Route 114) From Nath From East From South Start Time Right Thru Left Peds TPp. Right Th. Left Peds APPe. Tot Right Thru Left Peds AppTote Peak Hour Fran 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM C Volume 0 790 28 0 8181 20 0 30 0 50 I 17 950 0 0 967 Percent 0.0 96.6 3.4 0.0 40.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 1.8 98.2 0.0 0.0 05:15 Volume 0 194 8 0 202 I 5 0 6 0 11 1 268 0 0 269 C Peak Factor High Int 05:00 PM 04:45 PM 05:15 PM Volume 0 206 7 0 213 8 0 7 0 15 1 268 0 0 269 Peak Factor 0.960 0.833 0.899 L� C C I n 3383 Int Total 1835 482 1"952 /S: Turnpike Street (Route 114) : Sharpner's Pond Road City, State: North Andover, MA F"IClient: DJK/D. Kelly T®C Transportation Data Corporation 12 Walnut Street, #9 Natick, MA 01760 Office: 508-651-1610 Fax: 508-651-1229 (:m ins PrintwL Tmrk-c File Name : 01873AA Site Code : 00000571 Start Date : 02/05/2002 Page No : 1 Grand Total 0 Tumpike Street (Route 114) I 01 Sharpness Pond Road Tumpike Street (Route 114) 2 0 0 20 From North 0 52 From East 100.0 0.0 0.01 From South 0.0 50.0 0.0 Start Time I R•9ht Thru Left I Peds I RightRightT Thru I Left I Peds 1 R' ht Thru Left Peds Int Total 3.8 04:00 PM 0 4 0 01 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 10 04:15 PM 0 5 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 04:30 PM 0 4 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 6 Start Time 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 j 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 Left 0 13 0 0, 2 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 26 EITotal 05:00 PM 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 01 0 3 0 01 9 j 05:15 PM 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0� 6 0 05:30 PM 0 4 0 01 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 8 66.7 05:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 Total 0 15 0 01 0 0 2 01 0 9 0 01 26 Grand Total 0 28 0 01 2 0 2 0 0 20 0 0 52 Apprch % 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.01 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 53.8 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 38.5 0.0 0.0 Tumpike Street (Route 114) Sharpnefs Pond Road Tumpike Street (Route 114) CI From North I From East From South Start Time Right ThN Left Peds APP• Total Right ThN Left Peds APP' Total Right ThN Left Peds APP• Total Int Total Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 n Intersection 04:45 PM j ILJj Volume 0 14 0 0 141 1 0 2 0 3 0 10 0 0 10 27 Percent 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 05:00 Volume 0 5 0 0 5' 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 9 Peak Factor High Int 05:00 PM 04:45 PM 1 04:45 PM 0.750 Volume 0 5 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3I Peak Factor 0.700 0.750 0.833 C T®C - 9l ATR : Route 114 south of Sharpnees Transportation Data Corporation Dat 571 Location: : Pond Road, North Andover, Ma p p Date: 02/05/02 �1 12auSac Wlnt treet, #9 Ntik, M 0 6 0 A 17 I tient: DJK/D. Kelly Office: 508-651-1610 Fax: 508-651-1229 terval 9,832 20,364 NB 48.3 SB 07:00 04:45 07:15 \ 04:45 1,071 964 955 791 i 2,010 1,755 Combined Day: Tuesday Begin AM PM AM PM AM PM 12:00 26 74 116 485 18 36 130 458 44 110 246 943 C12:15 26 105 6 121 32 226 12:30 7 134 8 111 15 245 12:45 15 130 4 96 19 226 01:00 7 26 118 487 14 37 130 521 21 63 248 1,008 01:15 9 124 10 117 19 241 01:30 3 147 6 132 9 279 01:45 7 98 7 142 14 240 02:00 6 19 152 700 4 20 136 581 10 39 288 1,281 7 158 3 152 10 310 C02:15 02:30 2 128 5 143 7 271 02:45 4 262 8 150 12 412 03:00 3 24 202 903 5 24 158 712 8 48 360 1,615 4 231 0 192 4 423 C03:15 03:30 10 252 12 200 22 452 03:45 7 218 7 162 14 380 04:00 4 45 210 841 6 50 175 732 10 95 385 1,573 04:15 13 201 8 185 21 386 C04:30 12 202 16 182 28 384 04:45 16 228 20 190 36 418 05:00 18 157 214 960 22 198 196 785 40 355 410 1,745 05:15 34 262 40 211 74 473 48 260 70 194 118 454 C05:30 05:45 57 224 66 184 123 408 06:00 73 487 202 614 92 691 184 571 165 1,178 386 1,185 06:15 114 158 163 152 277 310 152 146 220 115 372 261 C06:30 06:45 148 108 216 120 364 228 07:00 170 996 120 371 214 955 113 339 384 1,951 233 710 07:15 283 92 252 82 535 174 274 79 246 76 520 155 C07:30 07:45 269 80 243 68 512 148 08:00 245 993 68 337 198 815 70 262 443 1,808 138 599 08:15 270 98 233 70 503 168 08:30 254 92 204 64 458 156 08:45 224 79 180 58 404 137 k t 09:00 176 560 82 268 164 600 55 194 340 1,160 137 462 09:15 146 78 158 55 304 133 09:30 131 55 141 47 272 102 107 53 137 37 244 90 C09:45 10:00 109 439 42 147 105 507 38 1156 214 946 80 303 10:15 112 45 120 44 232 89 10:30 108 34 144 46 252 80 110 26 138 28 248 54 C10:45 11:00 113 465 38 134 96 490 22 98 209 955 60 232 11:15 120 35 133 26 253 61 11:30 108 28 108 30 216 58 124 33 153 20 277 53 C11:45 Totals 4,285 6247 4,423 5,409 8,708 11,656 Split% 49.2 53.6 50.8 46.4 Totals 10,532 9,832 20,364 CDay Day Splits 51.7 48.3 Peak Hour 07:15 04:45 07:00 04:45 07:15 \ 04:45 1,071 964 955 791 i 2,010 1,755 CVolume Factor 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.94 0.94 t 0.93 . • Data File : 01873A �_ TDC Site: 5711 1/ Route 114 south ofSharpners Transportation Data Corporation Location: : Pond Road, North Andover, Ma pDate: 02/06/02 12 Walnut Street, #9 Natick, MA 01760 IienY : DJK/D. Kelly Office: 508-651-1610 Fax: 508-651-1229 Citerval Totals 10,678 9,985 20,663 CDay Day Splits 51.7 48.3 Combined Day: Wednesday Volume 1,037 965 913 896 1,950 ; 1,853 NB Factor 0.87 0.89 0.88 0.94 0.93 i 0.9 SB Begin AM PM AM PM AM PM 12:00 21 55 134 534 16 45 139 505 37 100 273 1,039 12:15 19 118 9 12 120 130 28 17 238 272 12:30 5 142 12:45 10 140 8 116 18 256 01:00 9 25 116 568 8 22 132 566 17 47 248 1,134 01:15 5 140 144 4 7 150 150 9 15 290 294 01:30 01:45 8 3 168 3 134 6 302 02:00 6 24 144 688 3 16 158 603 9 40 302 1291 02:15 10 166 3 148 13 314 02:30 4 140 2 139 6 279 02:45 4 238 8 158 12 396 03:00 5 24 196 891 2 20 172 732 7 44 368 1,623 n 03:15 6 236 2 180 8 416 f j 03:30 8 261 10 208 18 469 LLLiii 03:45 5 198 6 172 11 370 04:00 3 42 200 853 5 62 166 742 8 104 366 1,595 04:15 9 228 12 189 21 417 04:30 12 211 17 189 29 400 04:45 18 214 28 198 46 412 05:00 16 147 215 965 18 218 232 888 34 365 447 1,853 05:15 36 272 42 238 78 510 C05:30 37 228 250 72 86 228 190 109 144 456 440 05:45 06:00 58 76 542 177 594 96 694 177 602 172 1,236 354 1,196 06:15 130 166 176 178 306 344 06:30 160 127 205 123 365 250 06:45 176 124 217 124 393 248 07:00 190 997 124 418 206 910 84 328 396 1,907 208 746 07:15 244 120 220 88 464 208 07:30 266 96 258 94 524 190 07A5 297 78 226 62 523 140 08:00 212 958 89 337 200 773 74 244 412 1,731 163 581 08:15 262 78 229 80 491 158 08:30 262 82 184 44 446 126 08:45 222 88 160 46 382 134 09:00 168 523 74 300 152 580 56 175 320 1,103 130 475 09:15 139 68 152 48 291 116 09:30 124 74 144 33 268 107 ��n lul 09:45 92 84 65 i91 132 104 512 38 48 158 224 206 954 122 113 349 10:00 10:15 102 114 442 44 128 40 242 84 10:30 102 46 148 36 250 82 10:45 124 88 426 36 43 134 132 136 510 34 26 80 256 224 936 70 69 214 11:00 11:15 132 36 124 30 256 66 11:30 102 23 126 13 228 36 11:45 104 32 124 11 228 43 Totals 4,205 6,473 4,362 5,623 8,567 12,096 Split% 49.1 53.5 50.9 46.5 C Data a Totals 10,678 9,985 20,663 CDay Day Splits 51.7 48.3 Peak flour 07:30 05:00 07:30 04:45 07:30 05:00 k .. 1 Volume 1,037 965 913 896 1,950 ; 1,853 Factor 0.87 0.89 0.88 0.94 0.93 i 0.9 C Data a C CAPPENDIX B. INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS C C IN C C E C C n 571-ENF-A C 2002 Existing Moring Peak Hour DJK Associates, Inc. 3: Sharpners Pond Drive & Route 114 4/9/2002 i- 4�- 1' I �► Grade 0% 0% 0% ..� ��; :�-..�uz� .._ e_. - - .a:.�,x a�.ua..'s�`ti�.>�..��n,�:xs;�-:szs�: ���__3:,�;a„i.ra.u...�;�:�' �.sz,r,.�.:>.x•�....yu:,�. �:s.. �s Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pedestrians C15MT-1i1itoClf&t Right turn flare (veh g illedaar�erpeY Median storage veh RFC, otin vitt D v(`1 etanc i rnnf vi i C C C 11 C C tt- (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 . cM capacity (veh/h) 71 303 703 }�Volume Left � 42 -0y 13 00 ` cSH 244 1700 703 1700 «v?:..u., ry ..�e....::...ux��Y,sa: ,.d✓�,._.�. �µ..�';:.a,.- .�.,.� . �c�,;.•as;..h..,�cax ��,faQr �_.�..�::x�...mxz�3�i.,,.s,:.a.e" _;,,.:.��2.,,.�a....m'° x. ..� � ��� �'� Lane LOS g �j ^fD Approc�'lay Sx i6 W 9 x t ^5 Approach LOS D i Average Delay 1.2 C:\DJK\Synchro 5.0\571 Meadows, North Andover\2002 Exiisting and 2007 Build Morning Peak Hour.sy6 Page 1 C C C C C C C C C 2007 No Build Moring Peak Hour DJK Associates, Inc. 3: Sharpners Pond Drive & Route 114 4/8/2002 f- `1- a- ;Y Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pedestria�n�;s ;�a����Ei7��IL.\,� � ���-r.'".� �'�'•�,�": x�x� .may ��, rkp"�";"'. � �.`.�,:.:��zc � ���� �'^� 1 ^r "�� t�k a of `spm' Walkina Seed (ft/s) Volume Left 44 0 14 0 U'csF1-1-@"`RN--11—'*"— Lane �cS LOS E B ro_�w"r€.siw�b.isa�l. Approach LOS E Average Delay 2.0 C:\DJK\Synchro 5.0\571 Meadows, North Andover\07 NB AM.sy6 Page 1 C C C C C C C C 2002 Existing Evening Peak Hour DJK Associates, Inc. 3: Sharpners Pond Drive & Route 114 4/8/2002 f t t �' Lane Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pedestrians tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 cSH 254 1700 714 1700 �� n Queue Length (ft) 15 0 2 0 Lane LOS C B Ap�r�3a�h a�l�r�{� k.:,wxi.:. mtr.:,ar Approach LOS C Average Delay 0.8 CADJK\Synchro 5.0\571 Meadows, North Andover\02 and 07.sy6 Page 1 C C C rugnt turn tiare (veh tole E fie= Median storage veh �Icorfitt't/>) vC1, stage 1 conf vi C2, sta 2 c>f tC single (s) ���� , tF (s) n LI cM�yM FEE :�•c� Volume Left E r 2007 No Build Evening Peak Hour DJK Associates, Inc. 3: Sharpners Pond Drive & Route 114 4/8/2002 uraae 01/0 00/0 0% .c.xs:as'�x .c.�;�d«'>,b....�,,:,�:,a.., ..a„sa�. �..�er�.^-,,:.,.:�_-"".?.��.rs...,,.,_ - ,�,#e.:. ���x'v=«x,�.....,•,.aa�.:_..'-r•.,.a.....ss�.-`��.-sus "`,��e.�;i Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 a��e,..,,,:�..�.�u,�:.....�...:'s.,..a�;as-_.-._,.�._�,....�sr-s�,r,.:�.s.,:�<..��--�._,�-,v�..r.�: ��. ...s•,....G.�:�.a.� ,,:��.e acaa,�%,.� ,...�.'�-�3.r..s...3-..,�a�,�,��.�. Pedestrians t�slurxte;�i�t�hf � 7 }� ��;���� � $ ' �,� �}� ro'" s��� � � •m+a.x'-�cx^r;� ��-�.,rn"'^ �'�u'.�!� ,�g� r ^'"°��"�°,-��-- x.�,:+�ss.,.�f�w....:»��? cSH 216 1700 665 1700 l C C:\DJK\Synchro 5.0\571 Meadows, North Andover\07 NB PM.sy6 Page 1 C wJ U_ CHPProacn Average Delay l C C:\DJK\Synchro 5.0\571 Meadows, North Andover\07 NB PM.sy6 Page 1 C 2007 Build Evening Peak Hour 9: North Site Drive & Route 114 13-7�/ DJK Associates, Inc. 8/1/2002 E Grade 0% 0% 0% 0 29 ;' 92§ � 1 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 f og flow�rate�(veh/����$ � 0 � � 0 � 22�d,17 10 6 _ 1$; � � 29 t Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) C .�._ lg Right turn flare (veh) 1 1 C El cSH 357 118 734 657 1700 o uT a t©Cap c� �004t{j7;�: U 02 04, 0 56_�'�'_`. s :..ur.........�....ayt6a.r:.....,..as..+n.aim,#:r.'s,..3..L.._.s.,.,.L`a.»a.....v�.�rcvL,+.>;v...�.:°"".�.:.lis:i..._:.-.ia Queue Length (ft) 3 40 1 3 0 Lane LOS C F A LOS C F Average Delay 2.2 -�. a..ers� ^,� . - sit , ,�^-'.� ^�.�R-�.ra�-�t�,�'-; E xis} -- �+-.,O }--t'�st ' i+a--v g -.�-.r^-_�..g �..�u, : •�-^t�,.a„^�.•; 't:�a ^Y,-. c s � ;. ..., af. CC:\DJK\Synchro 5.0\571 Meadows, North Andover\02 and 07.sy6 Page 1 C Median storage veh) C k.'co%�litng,vo'�"�ume�2�06 vC1, stage 1 conf vol CtC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 '""o u, , .�f76 ii E0 f rs 6 n,:� 100 9298,:'; , 96' ti C cM capacity (veh/h) 33 49 324 36 49 273 734 657 f ��rs �'�., � 'moi `' t • L `i£y tT.., � . k.. ., a ",y„ �;!'����s r C El cSH 357 118 734 657 1700 o uT a t©Cap c� �004t{j7;�: U 02 04, 0 56_�'�'_`. s :..ur.........�....ayt6a.r:.....,..as..+n.aim,#:r.'s,..3..L.._.s.,.,.L`a.»a.....v�.�rcvL,+.>;v...�.:°"".�.:.lis:i..._:.-.ia Queue Length (ft) 3 40 1 3 0 Lane LOS C F A LOS C F Average Delay 2.2 -�. a..ers� ^,� . - sit , ,�^-'.� ^�.�R-�.ra�-�t�,�'-; E xis} -- �+-.,O }--t'�st ' i+a--v g -.�-.r^-_�..g �..�u, : •�-^t�,.a„^�.•; 't:�a ^Y,-. c s � ;. ..., af. CC:\DJK\Synchro 5.0\571 Meadows, North Andover\02 and 07.sy6 Page 1 C C C C G C G C C C C C 1 C r 2007 Build Evening Peak Hour With Mitigation 9: North Site Drive & Route 114 � � -,�F 4e a F/ DJK Associates, Inc. 8/1/2002 Lane Configurations 4-) -p.7-q -mar{ �c -'�; ami^.-.i...���.�-- "dR'---fit.•-�- ts..---�r'R3;w� � 'Fad'" `d6 { ign Cc►ntroL ' :s�L Stop .�,_` - Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% r Uolurne(vehThF;: #_0. "� .4 8 "� 22 17 1189271-N7 .. _ .L. Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 it l rluo y l'a to veli%h 294 9295," 77 RydP+.�M..:s..ma....,. a.+,,,.m. Pedestrians r Walkina Speed (ft/s) ht turn flare (veh) 1 5 Median storage veh) _ C c flicingolume 21;06 2 0930902031065=� X 7 1074,#t vC1, stage 1 conf vol � --^; fy •g ^..^• ... ,, 33 �. F�i�" .�`�,.: _ .. ..i = - _�4"'71777--T-'. ,x...-: tC. sinale (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 cM capacity (veh/h) 33 49 324 36 49 273 734 657 #5a:.s¢7r PoturoeRi �htrv" �`�8"`22 .�i18 "" .-i cSH 357 309 734 657 1700 k�olu ee toC.ac�D4''0.18'0 2"0 04056_ -- yy-" •�x+; -__ £ '.7-�; LVA, ► xp Lam. .. .! .,..,_a.;, .. <i� m 1 k..J �_�i..=�>�`x°1.. .'+La Queue Length (ft) 3 12 1 3 0 Lane LOS C C A B _ App"" p ach Dela s) 15.G g 2i 0 8 : 0 3 a j; 7 }). 7` Approach LOS C C Average Delay 1.2 C:\DJK\Synchro 5.0\571 Meadows, North Andover\02 and 07.sy6 Page 1 C D it C 11 El 1 C C C 2002 Existing Moring Peak Hour DJK Associates, Inc. 5: Industrial Drive & Route 114 4/9/2002 4�_ t Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1._00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pedestrians V%, I, Sldge I cont vol (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 -+'*Vxw�. ...:..3 ...., .S':«. a...r«.. '� .-..w :fi�a,rr�:s»: ,kw.r�,_..-..ate �...c.....+isr• a 3 � .w:SaY.w�..,w�ic'.P_._.,. Sz.+..ica'a'.i�.wea "a9`>'i�.d..-.,�ssr.[L.:" ae.�Y..<$. �£;,+Y��:< ,s 3,.d..a.:e��'* b,Lc���. �.Lsfrii:ix cSH 369 1700 703 k -au Queue Length (ft) 2 0 0 Lane LOS C A Approach Dela �,:... auxm.:,w .:Zfc,.,�,..,.-,,..,�,ew.�u"�"�,Nx.?w:>..�.a.»--�• a'.,1iu _! sem,. wt.. a..xrw.ta.:H„W., ��.-^.„`�.as Approach LOS C Average Delay 0.2 C:\DJK\Synchro 5.0\571 Meadows, North Andover\2002 Exiisting and 2007 Build Morning Peak Hour.sy6 Page 1 C C C C e C C C G C F1 El 2007 No Build Moring Peak Hour DJK Associates, Inc. 5: Industrial Drive & Route 114 4/9/2002 f 4- t �• �. l g - uraoe u /O U /O 0% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pedestrians `bane 1R1� ith �ft� ��'�- � -� � � - --•� �- '�` 'a f �F %zz� ���L� n ,..4 � �" i.,,' } n �, �"� a "'°ay,;.—>-y.,� t •s -,��a Walking Soeed (fUsl� -- vu i, stage i corer voi Volume [Left 5 0 5 cSH 316 1700 644 Queue Length (ft) 2 0 0 � � P`{" __.........,„,,....._..,__«..„,., Lane LOS C A - Aopr F - Se'a.5.,.wR]i.2 ..,L Approach LOS C Mverage Delay 0.2 Li C:\DJK\Synchro 5.0\571 Meadows, North Andover\07 NB AM.sy6 Page 1 C ly C Grade _ _ 0% 0% 0% — ye Peak 0 vC1, stage 1 conf vol tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 f I LojfuLf 11 , 11 ro1.0089 �+! 7&2 I LSI cM capacity (veh/h) 32 45 271 28 45 262 657 643 7 37717-. -17 I E I E I L-oTR7L—efff cSH 241 290 657 643 Approach LOS C C Average Delay 1.0 intersC :1tU7 �—j KyfL-C;ar- qji QUEa- LET ft" M -AEM� EC:\DJK\Synchro 5.0\571 Meadows, North Andover\2002 Exiisting and 2007 Build Morning Peak Hour.sy6 Page 1 E 2007 Build Morning Peak Hour 12: South Site Drive & DJ K Associates, Inc. 8/16/2002 t/'- \*. erne . -s '. 13 ' _.:Bi HL :.� < Ni . --*1 - - BR, -:w T BA C Lane Confiqurations C Grade _ _ 0% 0% 0% — ye Peak 0 vC1, stage 1 conf vol tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 f I LojfuLf 11 , 11 ro1.0089 �+! 7&2 I LSI cM capacity (veh/h) 32 45 271 28 45 262 657 643 7 37717-. -17 I E I E I L-oTR7L—efff cSH 241 290 657 643 Approach LOS C C Average Delay 1.0 intersC :1tU7 �—j KyfL-C;ar- qji QUEa- LET ft" M -AEM� EC:\DJK\Synchro 5.0\571 Meadows, North Andover\2002 Exiisting and 2007 Build Morning Peak Hour.sy6 Page 1 E E E I E E I 2002 Existing Evening Peak Hour DJK Associates, Inc. 5: Industrial Drive & Route 114 4/9/2002 Grade 0% 0% 0% 7 W"' V- � 1,417m, Peak Hour k -O -u r Pedestrians v —4 C tC; Jtager( �- 77' tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 I E r III I cM capacity (veh/h) 86 308 714 cSH 394 1700 714 Approach LOS �B Average Delay 0.2 CC:\DJK\Synchro 5.0\571 Meadows, North Andover\02 and 07.sy6 Page 1 I WO! ON 81113011 &KIN, 1 Lane Configurations Vi It itb -37 A Grade 0% 0% 0% 7 W"' V- � 1,417m, Peak Hour k -O -u r Pedestrians v —4 C tC; Jtager( �- 77' tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 I E r III I cM capacity (veh/h) 86 308 714 cSH 394 1700 714 Approach LOS �B Average Delay 0.2 CC:\DJK\Synchro 5.0\571 Meadows, North Andover\02 and 07.sy6 Page 1 I C C C D C C r C C C 2007 No Build Evening Peak Hour DJK Associates, Inc. 5: Industrial Drive & Route 114 4/9/2002 fe *-- t �,-. � e.,-.:.-asr.-zs:�:ss�.,.__� �ra��,�.'�,�,..K..�:�sm.���'�,s.�,�..:..�, ?..»,sem:,.. "< ••ca.orZ�k.�.--.e.,�..:.�...c�^�.°"k,.•� ; Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pedestrians vCi, stage 1 conf vol tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 cM capacity (veh/h) 67 276 665 cSH 343 1700 665 ro Approach Average Delay 0,2 C:\DJK\Synchro 5.0\571 Meadows, North Andover\07 NB PM.sy6 Page 1 E 2007 Build Evening Peak Hour DJK Associates, Inc. E12: South Site Drive & 8/1/2002 __IN, A_ 4,\ t /W \*. 4/ I E E E, I I I E Ell E E Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% glume 77 I V.�07ov' I 5 , V�, L 7 7-71 �0 L& Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pedestrians Median storage veh) vC1, stage 1 conf vol tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 T (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 cM capacity (veh/h) 36 50 318 35 49 270 721 656 ................... =ZEITIM -1. U1 FY. T"TTITZ7 Volume Left 15 5 30 5 cSH 354 305 721 656 Lane LOS C C A A Approach LOS C C Average Delav 1.2 EC:\DJK\Synchro 5.0\571 Meadows, North Andover\02 and 07.sy6 Page 1 E, REGULATORY AGREEMENT [FHLBB-NEW ENGLAND FUND] For Ownership Projects '�t, ` This Regulatory Agreement (this "Agreement") is made this � day of May 2005 by Valley Realty Development, LLC , a Massachusetts Limited Liability Company having an address at 231 Sutton Street ' P.O. Box 90i, North Andover, MA 01845 ("Developer") and T.D. Banknorth, N.A. of 70 Main Street, Worcester, MA 01608 (the "Bank"), a member institution of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston. BACKGROUND: A. The Developer intends to construct a 269 unit homeownership development on an approximate 47.14 acre site on Turnpike Street Road in North Andover, MA, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached to and made apart of this Agreement (the "Project"). B. The Developer has received a comprehensive permit (the "Comprehensive Permit") from the Zoning Board of Appeals for the City/Town of North Andover (the "Municipality") under Chapter 40B of the Massachusetts General Laws, which permit is recorded at the Essex North District Registry of Deeds (the "Registry") at Book 8978, Page 320. C. The Comprehensive Permit has specified that 75 units, or 27.78% of the total units in the Project will be affordable units (the "Affordable Units") which will be subject to this Regulatory Agreement to restrict the sale of the Affordable Units to moderate income first time home buyers. D. Pursuant to the terms of this Regulatory Agreement, the Affordable Units will be sold to households earning no more than eighty percent (80%) of the median income, by household size, for the Lawrence, MA -NH PMSA Area (the "Base Income") as published from time to time by,the Department of Housing and Community Development of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts or successor agency ("DHCD"). E. The Project is being financed under the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston's New England Fund ("NEF") and the NEF requires that the Developer provide the number of Affordable Units described above. F. Pursuant to the requirements of the Comprehensive Permit and this Regulatory Agreement, the Developer has agreed to retain Citizens' Housing and Planning Association, Inc. (the "Monitoring Agent") to perform monitoring and enforcement services regarding compliance of the Project with the Affordability Requirement and compliance of the Developer with the Limited Dividend Requirement. G. The Affordable Units in Oakridge Village are the following Units: Building 1: Units 3, 5, 9, 11,15, 17, 21, 23, 27, 33, 35; Building 2: Units 39, 41, 45, 47, 51, 53, 59, 63, 65, 71; Building 3: Units 76, 81, 83, 86, 92, 95, 98,104, 107; Building 4: Units 110, 112, 114, 117, 119, 121, 123, of -1- (100250921.8) ,D OCT 14 2005 BOARD OF APPEALS O 125, 127, 128, 130, 132, 134, 139, 141, 145, 149, 151, 154, 158, 163, 165, 173, 175, 178 and in Maplewood Reserve the following Units: Building 6: Unit 7 and 10;. Building 9: Unit 4; Building 11: Unit 4; Building 13: Units 2 and 4; Building 14: Unit 2; Building 15: Unit 2; Building 16: Units 2 and 5; Building 17: Unit 2; Building 18: Units 2 and 4; Building 20: Unit 2; Building 22: Unit 2; Building 23: Units 2 and 4; Building 25: Unit 2; Building 26: Unit 3: Building 27: Unit 3 all at Maplewood Reserve/Oakwood Village Condominium, a condominium to be established by Master Deed to be recorded with the Registry. The Affordable Units are the Units referred to as the First Home Units in the Master Deed. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements and covenants set forth in this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the Developer and the Bank agree and covenant as follows: 1. Unit Designation. The distribution of the Affordable Units by unit size shall be as set forth below: Number of Units 1 BEDROOM 18 Oakridge Village Bldg./Unit Nos. 2 BEDROOM 37 Oakridge Village Bldg./Unit Nos. 3 BEDROOM 20 Maplewood Reserve Bldg./Unit Nos. Building 1: Units Building 1: Units Building 6: Units 7 and 5, 9, 17, 21, 33. 3, 11,15, 23, 27, 35. 10. Building 2: Units Building 2: Units Building 9: Unit 4. 41, 45, 53, 65. 39, 47, 51, 59, 63, 71. Building 11: Unit 4. Building 3: Units Building 3: Units 81, 86, 98. 76, 83, 92, 95, 104, 107. Building 13: Units 2and 4. Building 4: Units Building 4: Units 110, 121, 127, 134, 112, 114, 117, 119, 123, Building 14: Unit 2. 145, 158. 125, 128, 130, 132, 139, 141, 149, 151, 154, 163, Building 15: Unit 2. 165, 173, 175, 178. Building 16: Units 2 and 5. Building 17: Unit 2. Building 18: Units 2 and 4. 0 -2- (K0250921.8) Initial Affordable Price $146,000.00 $160,000.00 $174,000.00 (the initial Certified Sale Price) The Certified Sale Price of an Affordable Unit shall be the price such that a household earning the Base Income for a family of four (4) would pay no more than 33% of gross income for the sum of annual debt service on a mortgage of 95% of the Certified Sales Price (including principal and interest at current interest rates) plus property taxes, property insurance (unless covered by the condominium fees), private mortgage insurance and any required condominium association fees. The Certified Sales Price shall be determined by the Monitoring Agent. 2. Affordability. Except as specifically provided in the Deed Rider attached as Exhibit B, the Affordable Units shall be sold to households which have an annual income equal to or less than the Base Income as adjusted from time to time according to DHCD guidelines. The first sale of an Affordable Unit by the Developer shall be at a price not in excess of the Initial Affordable Price set forth in Section 1 of this Agreement for that Affordable Unit. Subsequent sales ("Resales") of Affordable Units shall be for sale prices that are affordable to families of four whose gross annual income is equal to 80% of the median income for the Haverhill MA -NH Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area as determined by DHCD at the time of such subsequent sale (the "Maximum Resale Price"). The Maximum Resale Price shall be determined by the Monitoring Agent within fourteen (14) days of the Monitoring Agent receiving notice from the seller of its intention to sell the Affordable Unit, and shall be calculated in the same manner as the Certified Sales Price, above. In the event that a subsequent seller of an Affordable Unit disputes the Monitoring Agent's determination of the Maximum Resale Price, the Seller may appeal said determination to the Municipality or its designated board or official, which may, in its sole discretion, either (a) affirm the Monitoring Agent's determination; (b) annul the Monitoring Agent's determination and set a different Maximum Resale Price; or (c) annul the Monitoring Agent's determination and direct the Monitoring Agent to re -calculate the Maximum Resale Price using criteria consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Permit and O-3- (x0250921.8) Building 20: Unit 2 Building 22: Unit 2. Building 23: Units 2 and 4. Building 25: Unit 2 Building 26: Unit 3. Building 27: Unit 3 Initial Affordable Price $146,000.00 $160,000.00 $174,000.00 (the initial Certified Sale Price) The Certified Sale Price of an Affordable Unit shall be the price such that a household earning the Base Income for a family of four (4) would pay no more than 33% of gross income for the sum of annual debt service on a mortgage of 95% of the Certified Sales Price (including principal and interest at current interest rates) plus property taxes, property insurance (unless covered by the condominium fees), private mortgage insurance and any required condominium association fees. The Certified Sales Price shall be determined by the Monitoring Agent. 2. Affordability. Except as specifically provided in the Deed Rider attached as Exhibit B, the Affordable Units shall be sold to households which have an annual income equal to or less than the Base Income as adjusted from time to time according to DHCD guidelines. The first sale of an Affordable Unit by the Developer shall be at a price not in excess of the Initial Affordable Price set forth in Section 1 of this Agreement for that Affordable Unit. Subsequent sales ("Resales") of Affordable Units shall be for sale prices that are affordable to families of four whose gross annual income is equal to 80% of the median income for the Haverhill MA -NH Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area as determined by DHCD at the time of such subsequent sale (the "Maximum Resale Price"). The Maximum Resale Price shall be determined by the Monitoring Agent within fourteen (14) days of the Monitoring Agent receiving notice from the seller of its intention to sell the Affordable Unit, and shall be calculated in the same manner as the Certified Sales Price, above. In the event that a subsequent seller of an Affordable Unit disputes the Monitoring Agent's determination of the Maximum Resale Price, the Seller may appeal said determination to the Municipality or its designated board or official, which may, in its sole discretion, either (a) affirm the Monitoring Agent's determination; (b) annul the Monitoring Agent's determination and set a different Maximum Resale Price; or (c) annul the Monitoring Agent's determination and direct the Monitoring Agent to re -calculate the Maximum Resale Price using criteria consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Permit and O-3- (x0250921.8) r Tows cif Noah Andover Office. of the Zig Qa . Burd of Appeals DeoelZFopu>teIIt �e><vices I street North Andover, Massa&weft One Ar' D. Robert Mcettaa b that ► Gbp) A Tut hw�ratt�paed tiotn tlala ddtactelon, #tad Bufl&ng ConwrfssfauNilltotdtttlrV of Dal Nuk Notice of Decision Year Town Clark BK 8918 PG 320 Any appeal shall be .flied within (20) - Pl'operty at :nV �� a tenet days after the date of filing of this notice in the office ofthe town dart. NAME: Valley Realty Development. LLC DATE: January 14, 2003 ADDRESS: 231 Sutton St. Suite 2E -F pLr MON: 2002-31 North Andover, MA 01845 1iEARM: j 07/x9/02, 0$/13/02, 09/10/02, • 1Qf25J02,10 22J02,1Q/29/02,, 11/12A)2,12110102.: The Narth Andover Board OfAppeals hearing was closed Docdmaber 10. ?.002 byl � bgmiDg iu dight at:s uOns for Toa►n Bowls' and Ci�,s, Inv& T�piubiic meeting. 'ibeft. December 17, 2002 at 6-M pin in the cAdmence for w 40 days. The "i adds •. Andover, was apace for Board Rte. I Floor. Town iistl, IZO Main Shoet..NorIct ams to discuss the mgttm fat a eve pennit by V8114, Realty Dmelopme'K LLG 231 Sutton Street, Suite 2E -F. NoM Andover, Mme, This was for 270 per MUL ChW 40D 6120-22. Mn sides i - and I -I Itr�id aooes6 located at 23� housing S have 2mih A d VCMunits set calla as "a>yadable" in the R2-Resideet;:[ a� �v 7�P drat, North Amiover, Massachusetts. o vo 'flee foIIawiog Members wee p mseut and t m Wakr F . Q William SuMvan was not is . Soon A. Karpinsioi, Edea P. McIntyre, and Ower K may. att�deaoe daring the vote. . Pon a motion by GQO W M' Earley, and seconded by Scow A. Karphuid. the Board vaned to A1C Pumt Pmt to MM Chap. 408 $120-22 for 270 QRANT due A the afkr dable per the following preliminary plans: - h0 °g units which 27.78% or -75 units win be CD Pnpand M Shear. Tia lieu Dame t7' a GSD Ase6ekii.km b t33D Asaodetas, kr SP -1 SITE WUMARY AND Ptit UNARY .. ... ... .. ..._AAAA._.. _AAAA... �l •-- -_.. .. ?BNCiR)2 c GSD Assodetes, kv-.SP2 E)QS'TINB SR'E OONC)ITIpNg d GZA t3soEnWr*nmenhd- tnc.-Mess. C -IA EXPJTM commoNs PLAN i$IU0Ha2 e t3ZA t3eoEri1rotimMnlat, k --mam C-1 B EXMTM CANS PLAN 12/t1CiIB2 f GZAtM, ktc.-Mess. C•1C EXISTM COND"10M_PLAN 1Z/D31g2 9 GZA QwErerkwn*rtW, brc.-Mass. C -2A SITE DeiaD MEW ANDOAAOM PLAN . 12/r!8/Q2 BOARD OP APPEALS 6Y8 9341 BLU DM 611"545 C'ONSt;RVATXW 688.9330 irAi.Tii.6ff8-93 (1 Pi.AN�ryNQ 68d -A533 C • S� 1 1IS s� ��o'(.-E' 43 Tom ta 11T,r4t mover Office Zg..lBtxcrd of A COMM ity Developnent Md Vices Dmi- 27 Charles sheet North Andover, Massae 01845 AT' This is to car* that wm* PO) � D. ltobart Nicew have etep3W:ttom (10 oto #led A Trz Bwldng Com datorw~ ON ofJoyce Q G. Notice ©f Dee year Town Clerk Town a �. r it •r.. '. Any appeal fa}] be filed within (20) -, days afta the date of filing of this • I'rWe 'ty at 2357 Turn e S t notice in the office of the town clerk. NAME: Valley Realty Development, LLC DATE: Ianuary I4, 2003 ADDRESS: 231 Sutton St. Suite 2E F FETMON. 2002-31 North Andover. MA 01845 HEARIl�1rG: 07/09) %�, (!8/13/02, 09/10/02, • 10/IS/02,10)WO2, 10MAM., 11/1 2/02, 12!10102: �-► The North AndoverBoad Board of Appeals held one public bearing in eight sessions for Town Boards' and Citizens' -BuL The g was closed on December 10. 2002 by placing the petition "under advisement" for 40 days. The "� » meeting, may. 17, 2002- at 6:00 .m. in the Cmif a e Andover, Massachusetts, was opened far Board members to disas�s clic Ronan, 1 floor. Tows Dail, 120 Main Street,: Norther Development, LLC, 231 Sutton Stznet, Suite 2S -F, North Andover request fat a eomptehensive Permit by Valley Realty _.._. M This Per MOL, chap. 40B §§20-22. The&Dosing is to have 27.7896 of the aside as " naii ion w s f n the r2 0 h�eg its U - , ResideripaE� and N 1-1 Industrial zones, located at 2357 Mimpike Street, North Andover, Mme CD 7be f nz' Sullivan� Present and voting: Wafterp. Soule, Scoot A. �� � ' allendeam during the vote.' P. M , M Earley. �Pa >° by George, E � arley and seconded by Soon A. 1{agxin d, the Board voted to GRANT the Apoicam roue comPreliensive PeMt pursuant to MM Chap. 40B §§20-22 for 270 housing units of which 27.78% or 75 units will be � affordable per the fOHOVAng preliminary plans: Prepared by Shoat - TWO Rev. Data D GM Assodan, Inc. SPA SITE P"9—,L— GSD o9—,L— (SSD Associates. bac EXtSTiNG SITE COMMONS d (17A GeWa*wwXntal, 1M.44W 04A EXWM1(, CONDIjoM PLAN 12103fo2 e t3ZA QeoEravkonmeittat. bac.-Mass. C-1 B E)OSTH4 OONDMONS PLAN 12W/a2 f GZAGeoEn%ftnmentel. hr --less. CIC E=TING 00NOMONS.PLAN 12/03ro2 g GZA (+eoErn+ironrnentai, brae -Mass. G$A SITE BEYELOPMENT AND GRAOMVl3 MAN . 12/0&M BOARD OF APPEALS 6M9541 BUiLDM 68 8-9545 . CON3ERdATI©M6SM30 TH-6n-95." p�68&9533 SITE DEVELOPMENT AND GRADING PLAN h GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -2B 12/06/02 i GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -2C C-21) j 12/03/02 DETAILS k GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -2E I GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -3A m GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C-313 n GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -3C o GSD Associates, Inc. SP -3 p GSD Associates, Inc. SP -3-1 q GSD Associates, Inc. SP -3-2 r GSD Associates, Inc. SP -3-3 s GSD Associates, Inc. SP -3-4 t GSD Associates, Inc. Al -1.1 u GSD Associates, Inc. Al -2.1 v GSD Associates, Inc. A2-1.1 w GSD Associates, Inc. A2-1.2 x GSD Associates, Inc. A2-1.3 y GSD Associates, Inc. A2-2.1 z GSD Associates, Inc. A2-2.2 as GSD Associates, Inc. A3-1.1 ab GSD Associates, Inc. A3-2.1 ac GSD Associates, Inc. A4-1.1 SITE DEVELOPMENT AND GRADING PLAN 12/06/02 SITE DEVELOPMENT AND GRADING PLAN 12/06/02 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS 12/03/02 STORM WATER COLLECTION SYSTEM 12/03/02 DETAILS UTILITY PLAN 12/06/02 UTILITY PLAN 12/06/02 UTILITY PLAN 12/06/02 PRELIMINARY SITEPLAN 12/03/02 PRELIMINARY SITEPLAN W/ EASEMENTS 12/03/02 PARTIAL - SITEPLAN 12/03/02 PARTIAL - SITEPLAN 12/03/02 PARTIAL - SITEPLAN 12/03/02 TYP. 36 UNIT BLDG. FLOOR PLANS - 12/03/02 SCHEMATIC FLOORPLANS TYP. 36 UNIT BLDG. ELEVATIONS - 12/03/02 SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS TYP. 84 UNIT BLDG. FIRST FLOOR PLAN 12/03/02 TYP. 84 UNIT BLDG. SECOND AND THIRD 12/03/02 FLOOR PLAN TYP. 84 UNIT BLDG. FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 12/03/02 TYP. 84 UNIT BLDG. ELEVATIONS 12/03/02 TYP. 84 UNIT BLDG. ELEVATIONS 12/03/02 TYP. TOWN HOUSE FLOORPLANS 12/03/02 TYP. TOWN HOUSE ELEVATIONS 12/03/02 COMMUNITY BLDG. FLOORPLANS 12/03/02 Also, 22 general conditions, 30 specific conditions, and 33 waivers are included in the l9page document available for inspection at the Office of the Town Clerk, 120 Main Street and the Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals, 27 Charles Street and can be viewed during normal office hours. Voting in favor were Walter F. Soule, Scott A. Karpinski, Ellen P. McIntyre, and George M. Earley. Town of North Andover Board of Appeals Walter F. Soule Acting Chairperson RECEIVED Decision on Comprehensive Permit Applicatioi-OYCE BRADSHAW TOWN CLERK Valley Realty Development, LLC fi=OR! rl ANDOVER 231 Sutton Street, Suite 2E North Andover, MA 01845 2003 JAN 15 P 2: 3b Petition No. 2002-31 PROCEDURAL HISTORY Valley Realty Development, LLC, ("The Applicant"), is seeking a Comprehensive Permit pursuant to M.G.L. Chapter 40B, Sections 20 through 23, to construct 270 units of condominium housing of which 25% or 68 shall be set aside as "affordable," in the Residential 2 and Industrial 1 zoning districts, located at 2357 Turnpike Street, North Andover MA 01845, ("the Property"). ' The Comprehensive Permit application was submitted to the North Andover Town Clerk's office on June 11, 2002 at 1:30pm. The Town of North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals, after publication in The Eagle -Tribune on June 24, 2002 and July 1, 2002 and due notice sent to all abutters and interested parties, opened a public hearing on July 9, 2002 at the North Andover Senior Center at 120R MainStreet, North Andover, MA 01845. North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals members present were Chairman William Sullivan; Walter F. Soule, Vice Chairman; George M. Earley; Ellen R McIntyre; and Scott A. Karpinski. Robert Ford (Clerk), John Pallone, and Joseph D. Lagrasse were excused. A waiver for time extension was signed at the August 13, 2002 North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals hearing by Thomas D. Laudani, Manager for Valley Realty Development, LLC, for the Comprehensive Permit Application to be continued and heard at a regular hearing to be held on September 10, 2002 at 7:30 p.m.; an additional waiver for a time extension was signed on that date and also on hearing dates of October 15, 2002, October 22, 2002, October 29, 2002 and November 12, 2002. At the July 9, 2002 North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals hearing, and at subsequent hearings held to continue the public hearing, the Applicant was represented by Thomas D. Laudani, Manager of Valley Realty Development, LLC, 231 Sutton Street Suite 2E -F, North Andover, MA 01845; Robert W. Levy, Esq., Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Attorneys at Law, One International Place, 18`h Floor, Boston, MA 02110; Gregory P. Smith, AIA, GSD Associates, Inc., 148 Main Street Building "A", North Andover, MA 01845; Dermot J. Kelly, PE, PTOE, Dermot J. Kelly Associates, Inc., 280 Main Street, Suite 204, North Reading, MA 01864; Steven Trettel, GZA- GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass., One Edgewater Drive, Norwood, MA 02062; Christian Huntress, Huntress Associates, Inc., 17 Tewksbury Street, Andover, MA 01810; and Eric Loth, Gerry -Lynn Darcy, and Karen Pollastrino, Valley Realty Development, LLC. Mark West, West Environmental, Inc., 122 Mast Road, Suite 6, Lee, NH 03824, represented the Applicant for matters pertaining to the Conservation Commission, but did not appear at any Zoning Board of Appeals hearings. The public hearing was closed on December 10, 2002. The North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals made the following Findings of Fact and Decision subsequent to the hearing. These findings are based on the following submissions which include, but are not limited to, the following materials, which are on file at the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals and are being incorporated into this decision as a portion of this Application for a Comprehensive Permit. 1. Exhibit A: Traffic Impact and Access Study, Proposed Development Project, The Meadows, North Andover, MA, Prepared by DJK Associates, Inc. for Valley Realty Development, LLC, April, 2002; 2. Exhibit B: A Gap Study and Analysis, The Meadows, North Andover, MA, Prepared by DJK Associates, Inc. for Valley Realty Development, LLC, November 2002; Pagel of 19 3. Exhibit C: Fiscal Impact Analysis, prepared by Valley Realty Development, LLC for North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals, August 13, 2002, with subsequent revisions; 4. Exhibit D: Certificate of Legal Existence of Applicant; 5. Exhibit E: Certified List of Abutters; 6. Exhibit F: Sample Regulatory Agreement and Deed Rider; 7. Exhibit G: Student Residential Patterns, North Andover, MA prepared by School Geographics, Inc., November 2002; The Applicant submitted plans prepared by GSD Associates, Inc. dated June 3, 2002 to the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals with the submission of the Comprehensive Permit Application. The North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals circulated the plan for review to the North Andover Police Department, the North Andover Fire Department, the North Andover Conservation Commission, the North Andover Board of Health, the North Andover Planning Board, and the North Andover Department of Public Works. Partly as a result of comments and recommendations made by these Boards, the Applicant submitted revised plans dated December 3, 2002, which are the final revised preliminary plans, to the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals, which is the final plan the North AndoverZoning Board of Appeals reviewed for the Comprehensive Permit decision. There are no outstanding issues raised by any Town Boards. All issues have been addressed by the Applicant.. Prior to the close of the public hearing on December 17, 2002, the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals also received and considered the following written communications: No. DATE RECIPIENT SENDER CONTENT/NOTES 8 08/02/02 Gerry -Lynn Darcy Valley Tim Willett, N.A. DPW Hydrant Flow Test Realty Development, LLC 9 08/12/02 Mark Rees, Town Manager Bernice Fink, N.A. Finance Committee General 10 09/10/02 ZBA - William Sullivan Valley Realty Development, LLC 11 08/08/02 ZBA Julie Parrino, N.A. Con. Comm. 12 09/30/02 Secretary Durand J. Lionel Lucien, Manager 13 08/12/02 Heidi Griffin Richard Stanley, N.A. Police Dept. 14 07/19/02 Board of Appeals Lt. Melnikas, N.A. Fre Dept. 15 11/22/02 ZBA - William Sullivan Chief J. Dolan, N.A. Fire Dept. 16 08/07/02 ZBA Chairman Sandra Starr, N.A. Public Health 17 08/09/02 ZBA N.A. Board of Selectman 18 08/05/02 ZBA - William Sullivan Robert Beshara, N.A. DPW 19 08/08/02 ZBA Heidi Griffin, Dir. Of Community Development 20 08/21/02 ZBA - William Sullivan Valley Realty Development, LLC 21 09/09/02 ZBA Joseph Lagrasse C122 09/12/02 ZBA - William Sullivan Valley Realty Development, LLC Page 2 of 19 Applicant's Response to Bernice Fink's Memo Preliminary Review Mass Highway Commentary Public Safety Review Preliminary Review Final Acceptance of Terms and Names Preliminary Comments Preliminary Comments Preliminary Review Preliminary Comments Response to Comments from Dept. Heads General Comments on Architecture Response to Joseph Lagrasse Memo 23 10/22/02 ZBA - Walter Soule Susan Dennett General Comments 24 10/28/02 ZBA - William Sullivan Valley Realty Development, LLC Response to Susan Dennett 25 10/29/02 ZBA - William Sullivan Ira Singer, Town of Middleton Preliminary Review 26 :, 11/07/02 ZBA - William Sullivan Valley Realty Development, LLC Response to Ira Singer's Review 27 10/28/02 ZBA - William Sullivan Joseph Lagrasse Additional Comments 28 11/12/02 ZBA - William Sullivan Valley Realty Development, LLC Response to Joseph Lagrasse Comments 29 08/07/02 ZBA - William Sullivan Paul Kelly Citizen Comments 30 11/11/02 ZBA - William Sullivan Valley Realty Development, LLC Our Response to Paul Kelly's Comments 31 10/18/02 ZBA Paul Szymanski Fiscal Analysis Request 32 11/12/02 ZBA Paul Szymanski Proposed School Bus Stop 33 08/12/02 Town of Middleton Abutters List Zoning Board of Appeals Map 9 - Lot 1 34 08/12/02 ZBA - Abutters List for North. Assessors Office Map 108C Parcel 33, 38, 39 Andover 35 08/30/02 MEPA Valley Realty Development, LLC Expanded Environmental Notification Form 36 08/30/02 ZBA 7 MEPA DJK Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact and Access Study - 37 10/02/02 Robert Nicetta, Building VHB, Andrew Ogilvie Peer Engineering Review Commissioner 38 10/110/02 ZBA DJK Associates, Inc. GAP Study Trip Generations 39 12/09/02 Gerry -Lynn Darcy, Valley Realty J. William Hmurciak, Dir. DPW Letter regarding hydrant flow test Development, LLC In .addition to the .foregoing materials, the North. Andover Zon.ing Board of Appeals retained Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. (VHB) to provide a technical review of the Applicant's application, plans, and studies and to present findings of this review to the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals in writing. Included in this review was a review of the Traffic Impact and Access Study prepared by DJK Associates, Inc. on behalf of the Applicant.. This review was paid for from funds received from the Applicant for this purpose. The premises and site affected are known as 2357 Turnpike Street, North Andover, Massachusetts. The site consists of 47.14 acres of land and 863 feet of frontage on Turnpike Street and various residential and farm structures and kennel buildings. The site is not presently served by municipal water, sewer, or natural gas, all of which shall be extended to the site at the Applicant's expense. All of the existing structures are to be demolished. The Project as proposed is described as follows: Upper Meadows -192 one and two bedroom units- in four steel frame buildings, each with an elevator. Buildings 1, 2, and 3 shall have 36 units each; Buildings 1 and 2 shall have basement storage. Building 4 shall have 84 units and a 121 car garage; Lower Meadows - 78 three bedroom townhouse style units in 27 woodframe buildings. Parking shall consist of 80 garage spaces and 154 surface spaces. Total parking at the Upper Meadows is 428 spaces and at the Lower Meadows is 234 spaces. The site itself is irregular in shape. Wetlands as defined by the Wetlands Protection Act MGL Chapter 131 Section 40 are found on the site. The Applicant has filed a Notice of Intent under the 310 CMR 10.00, the Wetlands Protection Act Regulations, with the Conservation Commission on August 28, 2002, DEP File Number 242-1169, �or work to take place on the Property; and will file a Notice of Intent with the Conservation Commission for work to take place in the public right of way along Route 114 for the installation of utilities. Page 3 of 19 The parcel of land which is.the subject of the Comprehensive Permit application is owned by Theodore Meadows and Florence Meadows, Trustees of Meadows Realty Trust u/d/t dated October 29,1984 recorded with Essex North District Registry of Deeds Book 1888 Page 343. The Applicant is a duly organized Massachusetts limited liability company and has submitted the required evidence of site control to the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals. The current deed for the Property is recorded at the Essex North Registry of Deeds in Book 1888 Page 349. It is also identified as Assessor's MAp 108A Lot 17 and Map 108C Lots 33, 38, and 39. The site is located in Zoning Districts Residential 2 (R-2) and Industrial 1 (1-1). The FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map #250098-00.12C dated June 2,1993 indicates that the parcel is largely located in Zone C with a small portion in Zone A. Prior to the submission of the Comprehensive Permit application, the Applicant applied to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston's New England Fund for a project eligibility letter through the Wainwright Bank, a participating lender with an office in Boston, Massachusetts. Wainwright Bank reviewed the Application and issued a Project Eligibility Letter to the Applicant on April 18, 2002. As a result of the decision by the Massachusetts Housing Appeals Committee in Stuborn Ltd. Partnership v. Barnstable Bd. of Appeals, No. 98-01 (Decision March 5, 1999), the New England Fund was added to the list of eligible housing programs. No other subsidy programs.have been proposed by the Applicant. During the course of the public hearing, the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals also heard testimony from Dominic Terranova, Esq., who represented Nomid Trust, Joseph DiGrazia, Trustee, an abutter, and Jay Willis, Esq., Alfred J. Morrison, also an abutter. In addition, various members of the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals questioned the financial impact of the proposed Project on the Town of North Andover, specifically with respect to the impact on the public school, system.. As an accommodation to the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals, the Applicant submitted a Fiscal Impact Analysis and two Revised Fiscal Impact Analyses (Exhibit C) prepared using a model developed by the Natural Resources Defense Council called Developments and Dollars -an Introduction to Fiscal Impact Analysis in Land . Use Planning, principally authored" by Michael L. Siegel of Public and Environmental Finance Associates. The original Fiscal Impact Analysis assumed 53 children would live at the Meadows:.In response to questions and comments from the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals and the North Andover. Finance Committee representative, Bernice Fink, the Applicant revised the Analysis. The original and revised Analyses showed a positive fiscal impact to the Town, with a final break even point in excess of 98 children. On August 30, 2002, the Applicant submitted an Expanded Environmental Notification Form (EENF) to the Secretary of the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, Robert Durand, to initiate the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) review of the proposed Project. Upon completion of the review, the Secretary issued a Certificate of the Secretary of Environmental Affairs on the Environmental Notification Form, EOEA Number 12874, on October 31; . 2002, which required that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) be provided. In.the course of the public hearing, the North AndoverZoning Board of Appeals expressed concern regarding access to the Lower Meadows site from Route 114. In response to this concern, the Applicant has agreed to investigate the creation of a deceleration or taper lane traveling eastbound as Route 114 approaches the access road. The Applicant has stated that in order to create a deceleration lane, it will need permission and an easement from the Owner of the adjacent propertyto relocate.a driveway and permission from the Massachusetts Highway Department to alter Route 114. A letter dated October 29, 2002 was received from Ira Singer, Town Administrator, Town of Middleton, expressing his concerns regarding traffic with respect to two access roads from the Property intersecting Route 114 and the need for a traffic signal at the intersection of Sharpener's Pond Road, near the town boundary. The Applicant submitted a response prepared by its traffic consultant, DJK Associates, Inc. to the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals on November 7, 2002, a copy of which was also sent to Mr. Singer. In this response was included a copy of a letter dated September 30, 2002 from the Massachusetts Highway Department to the Secretaryof the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, Robert Durand, in which it is stated that "the Expanded ENF included a traffic study performed in accordance with EOEA/EOTC guidelines for traffic assessments" and that "we believe that the Expanded ENF has adequately addressed all state highway traffic issues related to The Meadows project, and we recommend that no further environmental review be required based on traffic issues." n the course of the public hearing , the Applicant was notified by the North Andover Fire Department that the use Y the name "Meadows" would conflict with other residential developments in Town already using that name. The Applicant submitted the name "Oakridge Village" for the Upper Meadows and "Maplewood Reserve" for the Lower Page 4 of 19 Meadows to both the Fire Department and the Police Department, which approved the selection. The Project has . been renamed accordingly. However, for clarity in this written decision, the names Upper Meadows and Lower Meadows will continue to be used in conjunction with the new names. In addition, the Fire Department indicated that it would seek permission from the Applicant to include a radio antenna on one of the community buildings. Another request of the Fire Department was to place portable defibrillators in certain locations throughout the Project and. provide training sessions for residents. The Applicant has agreed to work with the Fire Department on meeting their requests. In response to concerns from the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals regarding trash or rubbish pickup, the Applicant has agreed to provide a trash compactor in.each unit in the Upper Meadows/Oakridge Village, .two locations fortrash dumpters in the Upper Meadows/Oakridge Village, and private curbside trash pickup in the Lower Meadows/Maplewood Reserve. The Applicant has chosen the Citizens' Housing and Planning Association (CHAPA), as the agency to monitor the resale of the affordable units. The Applicant has agreed with CHAPA for these services and shall sign a contract with them to this effect. FINDINGS 1. The Applicant. The Applicant, Valley Realty Development, LLC, is a "limited dividend organization" as that term is used on M.G.L. Chap. 40B §-21 and 760 CIVIF1W.02 and shall sign a Regulatory Agreement with the funding agency to limit profits, and is eligible to apply for and receive a comprehensive permit. Valley -Realty Development, LLC is a.qualified applicant•pursuantto 760 CMR 31.01 in that it is a. limited dividend organization, the Project is fundable by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston's .(FHLB/B) New England Fund through a participating lender, and has control of the site as that tern! is used in 760 CMR 31.01 in that the Applicant has entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement for the acquisition of the property from Meadows Realty Trust, the present owner. - 2. Statutory Minima for Low and Moderate Income Housing. The Town of North Andover has not met the statutory minima set forth in M.G.L. Chap. 40B § 20 or 760 CMR 31.04. 3. The Proiect. The Project, as shown.onthe final Site Plan, consists of a 192 condominium units in four residential buildings and an additional community: building on the Upper Meadows/Oakridge Village site, including forty-five (45) one bedroom units, one hundred forty-seven (147) two bedroom units and a total of 428 parking spaces with related improvements; 78 three bedroom, condominium townhouse units and a community building on the Lower Meadows/Maplewood Reserve site; and a total of two hundred thirty four (234) parking Spaces with related improvements. The Project's new name is Oakridge Village (f/k/a the Upper Meadows).and Maplewood Reserve (f/k/a the Lower Meadows). 4. Affordable Housing to be Provided. Twenty-five percent (25%) of the units or 68 (sixty-eight) units shall•be "low or moderate income housing" as that term is defined in MGL Chap. 40B § 20. Seven (7) additional affordable one bedroom units of the applicant's choosing shall be provided at Upper Meadows/Oakridge Village. The final number of afford able units shall be 75 or 27.78% of the total. The Applicant has agreed to a restriction on affordability. The duration of the affordability restriction shall be for a term of 99 years from the date of this Decision, or, in the event of approval of the affordability restriction by Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development, in perpetuity or such other term contained in such restriction, as specified in the Conditions to this Decision. 5. Access and Traffic Issues. There shall be two means of access to and from the site: a driveway aligned with Sharpener's Pond Road and a driveway leading to the Upper Meadows/Oakridge Village. The North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals finds that the proposed access is properly designed and safe to accommodate the needs of the Project for ordinary and emergency services. In addition, the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals finds that the Applicant has satisfactorily addressed the issues raised by the Board's consultant, VHB, with -C j spect to traffic issues. Page 5 of 19 0 6. Support by Town. Board and Agencies. During the course of the public hearings, the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals sought -and received comments and concerns from Town boards including the Department of Public Works, the Police Department, the Fire Department, the Conservation Commission, the Planning. Board, and the Board of Health. The Applicant has addressed these concerns adequately, and there are no outstanding issues. 7. Waivers Granted. As part of its application for a comprehensive permit, the Applicant submitted a list of requested waivers to the North Andover Zoning Bylaw and other Town rules, regulations and bylaws. The North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals finds that these waivers, included herein as revised, are necessary to make the Project economically feasible and grants the requests. DECISION Based on the above findings and a 4-0 (four to zero) vote of the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals taken on January 14, 2003, a Comprehensive Permit for the Project, subject to the following twenty-two (22) general . conditions, thirty (30) specific conditions, and thirty-three (33) waivers, is hereby APPROVED with the following conditions. Comprehensive Permit Conditions A. General Conditions 1. The site, as shown on the plan endorsed by the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals shall not be substantially changed, altered or reconfigured inanywaywithout modification to this Comprehensive Permit, after notice and hearing by law. The following plans were prepared for the Applicant: Prepared by Sheet Title Rev. Date a GSD Associates, Inc. COVERSHEET 12/03/02 b GSD Associates, Inc. SP -1 SITE BOUNDARY AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAN c GSD Associates, Inc. SP -2 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS d GZA.GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -1A EXISTING.CONDITIONS PLAN eGZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -1B f GZA. GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -1C g GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -2A h GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C-213 1 GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -2C j GZA GeoEnvironmental; Inc. -Mass. C-21) k GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -2E I GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -3A m GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -3B EXISTING .CONDITIONS PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN SITE DEVELOPMENT AND GRADING PLAN SITE DEVELOPMENT AND GRADING PLAN SITE DEVELOPMENT AND GRADING PLAN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS STORM WATER COLLECTION SYSTEM DETAILS UTILITY PLAN UTILITY PLAN _CJ n GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -3C UTILITY PLAN Page 6 of 19 12/03/02 12/03/02 12/03/02 12/03/02 12/03/02 12/06/02 12/06/02 12/06/02 12/03/02 12/03/02 12/06/02 12/06/02 12/06/02 o GSD Associates, Inc. SP -3 PRELIMINARY SITEPLAN 12/03/02 p GSD Associates, Inc. SP -3-1 PRELIMINARY SITEPLAN W/ EASEMENTS 12/03/02 q GSD Associates, Inc. SP -3-2 PARTIAL - SITEPLAN 12/03/02 r GSD Associates, Inc. SP -3-3 PARTIAL-.SITEPLAN 12/03/02 s GSD Associates, Inc. SP -3-4 PARTIAL - SITEPLAN 12/03/02 t GSD Associates, Inc. Al -1.1 TYR 36 UNIT BLDG. FLOOR PLANS - 12/03/02 SCHEMATIC FLOORPLANS u GSD Associates, Inc. A1-2.1 TYP. 36 UNIT BLDG. ELEVATIONS - 12/03/02 SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS v GSD Associates, Inc. A2-1.1 TYP. 84 UNIT BLDG. FIRST FLOOR PLAN 12/03/02 w GSD Associates, Inc. A2-1.2 TYR 84 UNIT BLDG. SECOND AND THIRD 12/03/02 FLOOR PLAN x GSD Associates, Inc. A2-1.3 TYP. 84 UNIT BLDG. FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 12/03/02 y GSD Associates, Inc. A2-2.1 TYP. 84 UNIT BLDG. ELEVATIONS 12/03/02 z GSD Associates, Inc. A2-2.2 TYP. 84 UNIT BLDG. ELEVATIONS 12/03/02 as GSD Associates, Inc. A3-1.1 TYP. TOWN HOUSE FLOORPLANS 12/03/02 ab GSD Associates, Inc. A3-2.1 TYP. TOWN HOUSE ELEVATIONS 12/03/02 - 1 ac GSD Associates, Inc. A4-1.1 COMMUNITY BLDG. FLOORPLANS 12/03/02 cy 2. All requirements of the New England Fund program as administered by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston are to be met. The .Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants are to be executed by the Applicant as required by the program and shall be'recorded at the Essex North Registry of Deeds. 3. The number of units to be constructed under this Comprehensive Permit is two hundred seventy (270). The affordable units shall comprise twenty-five per cent (25%) of the total or sixty-eight (68) units which shall be indistinguishable from the outside from the market rate units. The Applicant shall endeavor to not locate any two affordable units contiguous to each other, unless the design of the buildings makes locating the 75 affordable units in this manner unattainable. The utilities, equipment, fixtures, and appliances in the affordable units shall be the same as those in the standard market rate units at time of first conveyance. This shall not be construed to prevent buyers of standard market rate units from upgrading the utilities, equipment, fixtures, and appliances, among others, in those units. 4. The Applicant has agreed to provide, in excess of the 25% minimum requirement, seven (7) additional one bedroom units of its choosing, to be located in The Upper Meadows/Oakridge Village. The total number of affordable units equals seventy-five (75) and the total affordable units comprise 27.78% of the 270 units approved. 5. All affordable units are to be sold through a lottery process in accordance with Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development guidelines. All fees and facilitation are to be the responsibility of the Applicant. Seventy per cent (70%) of the affordable units shall be set aside for North Andover residents according to a policy to be developed by the Applicant in conjunction with the Town of North Andover Community Development Department, and approved by the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals. Page 7 of 19 6. Occupancy for each unit is expected to take place as soon as is reasonably practicable after completion of construction, issuance of Certificate(s) of Occupancy by the building commissioner and conveyance to individual unit owners. 7. During construction, all local, state and federal laws and regulations shall be followed regarding noise, vibration, dust and blocking Town ways. At all times, the Applicant shall use reasonable means to. minimize inconvenience to the residents in the area. 8. The Applicant shall comply with all bylaws, rules and regulations, and codes pertaining to the development of the site, unless expressly waived herein. 9. Before beginning any construction under this Comprehensive Permit, other than site work, the Applicant shall furnish evidence to the Building Commissioner that this decision and the plans with the revisions necessitated by this decision, have been recorded with the Essex North Registry of Deeds. All plans shall include either an Engineer's or an Architect's stamp, as appropriate. Documentation of recording, including either a document number ora book and page number shall be provided to the Building Commissioner. 10. A certificate of insurance, naming the Applicant as the named insured, which shall include coverage for general liability in an amount not less than $1,000,000, automobile liability, umbrella coverage, and Workmen's Compensation, shall be submitted to the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals, prior to the beginning of construction, including site preparation. 11. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the Applicant shall submit to the North Andover Zoning'Board of Appeals for review and to the Building Commissioner for approval of final construction drawings and A final site plan signed by a Registered Architect and a Registered Engineer, as appropriate. 12. The Building Commissioner shall be the authorized agent of the North Andover Zoning: Board of Appeals and/or the Town of North Andover for the purposes of enforcement of any of the conditions, restrictions, or requirements of the comprehensive permit and is authorized to enforce any of these provisions in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth. I 13. The comprehensive permit is granted based on the Application and no use and no other improvements substantially different from those contemplated by the Project Plan shall be deemed permitted by virtue of the granting of the comprehensive permit. 14. The comprehensive permit shall run with the land. 15. The comprehensive permit shall become void in the event the Applicant does not obtain a building permit in connection with the Project within three' (3) years after the later of the date of (a) recording of this Permit by the Applicant with the Essex North Registry of Deeds or (b) the issuance of an Order of Conditions, which is not subject to an appeal or contest. 16. Any substantial deviation from the Project Plan shall require the approval of the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals, as determined by the Building Commissioner. 17. The Applicant shall not be permitted to receive a building permit (other than for the community building and site work) until such time as the Applicant has executed and delivered a Regulatory Agreement substantially in the form as shown in Exhibit F (the Regulatory Agreement). The North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals acknowledges that the form of the Regulatory Agreement. may be revised with respect to the details of reporting and similar requirements regarding the methods of achieving and monitoring compliance with substantive goals, based upon review of the form by the monitoring agent to be selected. 18. The waivers from all local bylaws, rules, and regulations granted are attached. All other bylaws, rules, and regulations remain in full force and effect. The Applicant shall pay all fees required for this property. No municipal fees are waived unless expressly stated in this decision. 19. The Project shall comply with all applicable state and federal regulations including but not limited State Building Code, State Sanitary Code, Architectural Access Board Regulations, and Plumbing, Electrical and Fire Codes. Page 8 of 19. 20. The Applicant shall submit for the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals' review and comment a construction mitigation plan that shall include, but not be limited to, measures to control erosion and sedimentation, tree and brush clearing, grading and general site mitigation measure. Cy 21. To the extent permitted by the law, residents of the Town of North Andover are to be granted a local preference for the affordable units. In no case shall local preference be granted for more than seventy percent (70%) of the affordable units. 22. Handicap accessibility shall be governed by the Massachusetts Architectural Board Rules and Regulations, 521 CMR. B. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1. The Applicant shall be responsible forthe snow removal, trash removal, rubbish removal, recyclable materials removal, road maintenance, and storm drainage maintenance on the property until such time as the organization of unit owners for the condominium assumes those obligations, which shall be stated in the condominium rules and regulations. 2. The Applicant shall develop and sell these units as condominiums and not as rental units. The rules and regulations of the condominium shall contain a provision whiclf is not less restrictive than the following:. Any lease or rental of a unit.by a Unit Owner, other than by the Declarant, shall be subject to. the following conditions: a. Such lease or rentalagreement shall be in writing; b. The lease, or rental .agreement shall apply to the entire unit, and not a portion thereof; C. The term of the lease or rental agreement shall be for a term of not less than six (6) months; J d. The occupancy of the unit shall be for not more than two (2) unrelated people; e. The lease or rental agreement shall expressly provide that the lease or rental is subject to the Master Deed, the Organization of Unit Owners and the Rules and Regulations of the Condominium; and f. A copy of the lease or rental agreement shall be provided to the Organization of Unit owners. g. Leasing or renting of the affordable units shall be prohibited, except as governed by the provisions of the Regulatory Agreement and Deed Rider. 3. The Applicant shall develop a preference policy for sale of the affordable units in conformance with guidelines established by the Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD). The Applicant shall work with the Town of North Andover towards this goal. 4. The Applicant shall hire as an outside monitoring agency Citizens'Housing and Planning Association (CHAPA). 5. Twenty-five percent (25%) of the total units in the Project shall be available for purchase by persons whose income is no more than 80% of the area median as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. In addition, the seven (7) additional affordable one bedroom units of the applicant's choosing which are to be provided at Upper Meadows/Oakridge Village also shall be available for purchase by persons whose income is no more than 80% of the area median as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The total number of affordable units equals 27.78%. These affordable units shall be mixed with and indistinguishable from market rate units throughout the buildings in the Project. A list of the affordable unit numbers nd a plan showing their location shall be submitted to the Building Commissioner at the time of application for a uilding permit and to the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals for their file. C.o. Page 9 of 19 Before any unit is .sold in the Project, the Applicant shall submit to the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals the proposed form of Deed Rider to be attached to and recorded with -the Deed for each and every affordable unit in the Project at the time of each sale and resale, which Deed Rider shall restrict each unit in accordance with this requirement in perpetuity in accordance with the requirements of MGL Chap. 184 5§ 31-33. Prior to submitting the proposed Deed Rider to the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals, the Applicant shall use its best efforts to obtain any necessary governmental approvals for such a deed restriction in perpetuity. In the event that the Department of Housing and Community Development (formerly the Executive Office of Communities and Development, EOCD) ("DHCD") is required by law to approve but declines to approve the perpetual restriction, the. proposed Deed Rider shall set forth a period of affordability which shall be the longest period allowed by law and approved by the DHCD, but in no case less than ninety-nine years as offered by the Applicant. In this event, the Applicant shall submit to the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals written evidence of the Applicant's efforts.to secure approval of the perpetual restriction, the written denial thereof, and the grounds for denial, IF PROVIDED; and the Applicant shall also grant to the Town of North Andover or its designee in the Deed Rider a right of first refusal, in a form mutually acceptable to counsel. for the Applicant and to Town Counsel, covering each and every affordable unit in the Project effective upon the expiration of the affordability period. 6. There shall be four (4) residential buildings containing 192 units in the Upper Meadows/Oakridge Village plus a community building. In addition, seven (7) additional one bedroom units of the Applicant's choosing shall be provided in the Upper Meadows/Oakridge Village. There shall be a total of 428 parking spaces in the Upper Meadows/Oakridge Village There shall be twenty-seven (27) residential buildings containing 78 units in the Lower Meadows/Maplewood Reserve and a community building. There shall be a total of 234 parking spaces in the Lower Meadows/Maplewood Reserve. The total number of parking spaces shall be 662 for an overall parking ratio of 2,45 parking spaces per unit. The.total number of affordable: units shall,be 75 (68 plus 7) for an overall ratio of 27.78%. 7. The Applicant shall provide handicapped accessible curb cuts at all locations where sidewalks cross over streets on the site. 8. The Applicant shall provide two dumpsters located on the site in the Upper Meadows/Oakridge Village as shown on the final revised preliminary plan. The Lower Meadows/Maplewood Reserve will have scheduled curbside trash pickup. 9. The Applicant shall provide snow storage locations on the site as shown on the final . revised preliminary plan. 10. There shall be two driveways to the site as shown on the final revised preliminary site plan. 11. There shall be master fire alarm box(es) as required by state code. 12. All buildings shall be equipped with a sprinkler system as per State regulations and building code. 13. The Applicant shall submit evidence of receipt of a Massachusetts Highway Department Permit for entrance onto Route 114/Turnpike Street before a building permit is issued. 14. A fire protection system shall be designed by a licensed fire protection engineer and approved by the North Andover Fire Department. 15. The execution of Form "U" by the North Andover Department of Public Works shall constitute approval acceptable to the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals relative to all on- and off-site drainage and utility issues, including, but not limited to gas, sewer, water, etc. 16. Cross connection details and proper backflow information regarding water tie-ins and the type and size of water services shall be provided and approved by the North Andover Department of Public Works; such _,approval shall not be unreasonably withheld and shall be issued in a timely fashion. Page 10 of 19 17. Installation. and maintenance of the sewer conduits, both force main and gravity, and the sewer . pumping station, shall be the responsibilityof the Applicant and subsequent condominium association until such time as the Town of North Andover requests a legal transferto the Town. The Applicant or the condominium association shall transfer the ownership of the sewer, In whole or in part,to the Town of North Andover at no cost. The sewer pumping station shall remain privately owned. 18. The Applicant shall: providedetails on the sewer main and sewer services including profiles of the utility to the North Andover Department of Public Works. 19. Drawings and specifications of the sewer conduits, sewer connections, and sewer pumping station design shall be submitted to the North Andover Department of Public Works for review. 20. All artificial lighting used to illuminate the exterior premises shall be arranged and shielded so as to prevent direct glare from the light source into any public street or private way or onto any adjacent property. 21. Screening and landscaping shall be substantially in compliance with the plan provided. 22. A drainage system maintenance manual shall be provided to the North Andover Department of Public Works. 23. A report by a Professional Engineer accompanied by certified As -Built plans of the construction of the drainage improvements shall be submitted to and accepted by the North Andover Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building permit other than a foundation permit or a building permit for the construction of the community building. 24. This Comprehensive Permit is conditional on the Applicant obtaining fee simple interest in the Property. 25. Whenever residents of the Project are eligible forschool busing, the bus shall pickup and discharge students at the community building at Upper Meadows/Oakridge Village only. 26. The Applicant shall provide a connection to the Harold Parker State Forest trail in Lower Meadows/Maplewood Reserve in the proximity of the community building. The boundary line between the State Forest and the site shall be identified with markings and small signs. _ 27. Prior to the commencement of construction, the Applicant shall post security to cover the cost of the road opening within the public right of way, including the water and sewer connections, in the amount to be determined by the North Andover Department of Public Works, in the form of a letter of credit or other security agreed to by the Applicant and the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals. 28. The Applicant shall install a conduit which is intended to serve a future traffic signal, should such signal be installed by the Massachusetts Highway Department, at the intersection with Sharpener's Pond Road. The conduit shall extend to the limit of the property in the vicinity of the driveway which accesses the Lower Meadows/Maplewood Reserve, and shall have a pull box at each end. 29. Upon receipt of building permits associated with the 75 affordable units, the Applicant shall contribute an amount equal to the water and sewer connection fees for the 75 affordable units, which is to be placed in the North Andover Department of Public Works "Water Supply Improvement" fund. This amount is to be equal to the water and sewer connection fees for the affordable units which are waived by the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals as part of this decision. 30. Upon completion of the project construction.and 80% occupancy of the project units, the Applicant project, as currently proposed. This study shall be supplied to the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals for shall commission at its own expense a revised Traffic Impact and Access Study inclusive of the "Little Professionals" information. The results of this revised Traffic Impact and Access Study are for informational purposes only, I Furthermore, the Applicant shall have no obligation as a result of this study other than the payment to have this study completed. . l Page 11 of 19 Page 12 of 19 Approved Waivers to the By -Laws and Regulations in Effect in the Town. of North Andover For the Approved 270 Unit Residential Housing Project To be known as The Meadows (now known as "OAKRIDGE VILLAGE" and "MAPLEWOOD RESERVE") at 2357 Turnpike Street, North Andover, Massachusetts Based on final revised plans and drawings prepared by.GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. and plans and drawings prepared by GSD Associates, Inc. including Prepared by Sheet Title Rev. Date a GSD Associates, Inc. COVERSHEET 12/03/02 b GSD Associates, Inc. SP -1 SITE BOUNDARY AND PRELIMINARY 12/03/02 SUBDIVISION PLAN c GSD Associates, Inc. SP -2 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS 12/03/02 d GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -1A EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 12/03/02 e GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -1B EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 12/03/02 f GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -1C EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 12/03/02 g GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -2A SITE DEVELOPMENT AND GRADING PLAN 12/06/02 h GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C-213 SITE DEVELOPMENT AND GRADING PLAN 12/06/02 I GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -2C SITE DEVELOPMENT AND GRADING PLAN 12/06/02 j GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C-21) EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS 12/03/02 k GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -2E STORM WATER COLLECTION SYSTEM 12/03/02 DETAILS I GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -3A UTILITY PLAN 12/06/02 m GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -3B UTILITY PLAN 12/06/02 n GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -3C UTILITY PLAN 12/06/02 o GSD Associates, Inc. SP -3 PRELIMINARY SITEPLAN 12/03/02 p GSD Associates, Inc. SP -3-1 PRELIMINARY SITEPLAN W/ EASEMENTS 12/03/02 q GSD Associates, Inc. SP -3-2 PARTIAL - SITEPLAN 12/03/02 r GSD Associates, Inc. SP -3-3 PARTIAL - SITEPLAN 12/03/02 s GSD Associates, Inc. SP -3-4 PARTIAL - SITEPLAN 12/03/02 I GSD Associates, Inc. Al -1.1 TYR 36 UNIT BLDG. FLOOR PLANS - 12/03/02 SCHEMATIC FLOORPLANS u GSD Associates, Inc. Al -2.1 TYR 36 UNIT BLDG. ELEVATIONS - 12/03/02 SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS Page 12 of 19 v GSD Associates, Inc. A2-1.1 TYP. 84 UNIT BLDG. FIRST FLOOR PLAN 12/03/02 w GSD Associates, Inc. A2-1.2 TYP. 84 UNIT BLDG. SECOND AND THIRD 12/03/02 FLOOR PLAN x GSD Associates, Inc. A2-1.3 TYP. 84 UNIT BLDG. FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 12/03/02 y GSD Associates, Inc. A2-2.1 TYP. 84 UNIT BLDG. ELEVATIONS 12/03/02 z GSD Associates, Inc. A2-2.2 TYP. 84 UNIT BLDG. ELEVATIONS 12/03/02 as GSD Associates, Inc. A3-1.1 TYP. TOWN HOUSE FLOORPLANS 12/03/02 ab GSD Associates, Inc. A3-2.1 TYP. TOWN HOUSE ELEVATIONS 12/03/02 ac GSD Associates, Inc. A4-1.1 COMMUNITY BLDG. FLOORPLANS 12/03/02 and based upon the Zoning Bylaw as amended through the Annual Town Meeting of 2002, the zoning waivers described herein are granted. The Applicant has received a Project Affordability Letter from Wainwright Bank as a participating lender in the Federal Home Loan Bank's New England Fund, which is a federally subsidized fund, to develop and construct 294 units of housing, of which 25% or 74 units were to be set aside as affordable housing. Since the receipt of the project affordability letter, the proposed Project has been revised to a total of 270 units of housing, of which 25% or 68 units are to be set aside as affordable housing under the minimum state guidelines. An additional seven (7) affordable one bedroom units of the Applicant's choosing are to be provided at Upper Meadows/Oakridge Village, for a total of 75 affordable units or 27.78%. The proposed Project is located at 2357 Turnpike Street in North Andover. The site is presently occupied by a number of kennels, fenced dog runs, and residential structures; however, the majority of the site is vacant and unbuilt. The new use, which shall be known as Oakridge Village and Maplewood Reserve, shall involve the demolition of the existing buildings and the construction of new residential, common, utility and garage buildings and related parking areas as indicated on the site plan. The site is located in two zoning districts, Industrial 1 (1-1) and Residential 2 (R-2). Multi -family dwellings are not. allowed by right in 1-1 and R -2 districts. In addition to market 'rate and affordable housing, the Applicant shall also provide 662 parking spaces, including garages, and landscape the site. The proposed affordable housing shall require the following waivers from the North Andover Zoning By -Law. Waivers Required from the Zoning Bylaw Based on the final revised preliminary site plan dated December 3, 2002 prepared by GSD Associates, Inc. and based upon the Zoning Bylaw as amended through the Annual Town Meeting of 2002, the Project is granted the following waivers. 1. Section 1 - Purposes: A Waiver is granted from this section where the regulations vary and/or in conflict with the regulations as provided by Chapter 40-B of the General Laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, which shall govern this Application, where they are in conflict. 2. Section 4 - Buildings and Uses Permitted: Page 13 of 19 A Waiver from Section 4.1.1.1 is granted which states: In the zoning districts above specified, the following designated buildings and alterations and extensions thereof and buildings accessory thereto and the �1 following designated uses of land, buildings, or part thereof and uses accessory thereto are permitted. All I other buildings and uses are hereby expressly prohibited except uses which are similar in character to the �1 permitted uses shall be treated as requiring a Special Permit. A waiver from this section is granted since the proposed multi family use is not allowable in the Industrial -1 and Residential - 2 district. A multi family use does not require a Special Permit. 3. A Waiver from Section 4.1.1.3 is granted which states: When a zoning district boundary divides a lot of record on June 5, 1972 in one ownership, all the zoning regulations set forth in this Zoning Bylaw applying to the greater part by area of such lot so divided may, by Special Permit, be deemed to apply and govern at and beyond such zoning district boundary, but only to an extent not more than one hundred (100) linear feet in depth (at a right angle to such boundary) into the lesser part by area of such lot so divided. A waiver is granted from this section in its entirety. This section could be interpreted to apply the this Project in that the Project is located in two zoning districts. 4. Waiver from Section 4.1.1.5 is granted which states: No private or public (1985/20) way giving access to a building or use or not permitted in a residential district shall be laid out or constructed so as to pass through a residential district This section is waived in entirely to allow such access since the private or public ways are located in and through a residential district that does not allow multifamily residences. 5. A Waiver from Section 4.121.1 is granted which states: One family dwelling, but not to exceed one dwelling on any one lot. A waiver from this section is granted to allow multi -family residential uses since the Project is a multifamily residential development on a single lot that has a total of 28 residential, utility and garage / buildings and community buildings located within an R-2 and 1-1 district. Waiver includes the ability to have development in this zoning district. multiple building and multefamiIy p 6. A Waiver from Section 4.121.7 is granted which states: Swimming pools in excess of two (2) feet deep shall be considered a structure and permitted provided they are enclosed by a suitable wall or fence at least four (4) feet in height to be determined by the. Building Inspector to prevent the entrance of persons other than those residing at the pool location. Pools shall have a minimum ten (10) foot setback from side and rear lot lines and be located no nearer the street than the building line of the dwelling, except by Special Permit. A waiver from this section is granted to allow the development of a community building with pool located within the R-2 district as indicated on the site plan. 7. A Waiver from Section 4..122.18 is granted which states: Any accessory use customarily not incident to any of the above permitted uses, provided that such accessory use shall not be injurious, noxious, or offensive to the neighborhood. A waiver from this section is granted insofar as it could be construed to prevent the placement on site of a sewage pumping station. 8. A waiver from Section 4.132 is granted insofar as.residential multi -family housing is not allowed in an 1-1 zoning district. 9. A waiver from Section 4.132.9 is granted which states: Swimming and/or tennis clubs and/or indoor ice skating facilities shall be permit with a Special Permit. A waiver is granted from this section insofar as any CJ proposed pool or community buildings may be considered a swimming club. The pool and the community building are for the exclusive use of the residents and their guests. Page 14 of 19 O 10. A waiver from Section 4.137 Flood Plain Overlay District is granted in its entirety. This waiver is granted as this section may be construed to hinder the development of this Project as indicated on the site plan. 11. A waiver from Section 4.2 Phased Development Bylaw is granted in its entirety. This waiver is granted as this section may be construed to hinder the development of this Project as indicated on the site plan. 12. A waiver from the Table 1 Summary of Use Regulations is granted. This waiver is granted to allow for multifamily dwellings and associated uses in each of the zoning districts which the property is located where it is not permitted by right. 13. A waiver from Section 5 Earth Materials Removal is granted in its entirety. This waiver is granted as this section may be construed to hinder the development of this Project as indicated on the site plan. 14. Section 7 - Dimensional Requirements: A waiver from Section 7 Dimensional Requirements is granted in accordance with the following table, List of Dimensional Waivers by Building 12/05/02 (rev.), including a waiver from Footnote 1, page FN1, 10' from the requirement that the first 50' have no parking as the plan shows parking beginning at 407 (rounded to 40') from the property line and 60'f rorn the requirement that no building be located less than 1 00'from Route 114 as Building #1 and Building #2 are shown on the revised final preliminary final plan as 407 (rounded to 40') from the property line. Summary: The following waivers as described above are granted from Table 2, Summary of Dimensional Requirements, and its footnotes, as referenced throughout the By -Law: Table 2 changes as listed below for all zoning districts. .. Page 15 of 19 A 4 111111 h �r 8 W w cj� BK 1 � 3`7 �`F to 11411111:11111 #oil 81 of of 811. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 :1111111111111 I III -If 111101V I fill If fillfig Ag�g���g�g$.g�g�g�g�g���g�g ;74 f N W.a m w A e9 Oe ae ® � •` � p P p ..TFFJJJ'•iTJ.;l�r�aF•iRTJ:T.:•.^.^.T.'?.: J'!iT> ryiJ,.!?;?JJTi.::::::—.zm............_c�+.., m i Ag�g���g�g$.g�g�g�g�g���g�g ;74 f N W.a m w A e9 Oe ae ® � •` � p P p ..TFFJJJ'•iTJ.;l�r�aF•iRTJ:T.:•.^.^.T.'?.: J'!iT> ryiJ,.!?;?JJTi.::::::—.zm............_c�+.., m 8 �ln 117 in 1"', '71 rl :1 P1.3 .'� ac 0 C 0 gga� °� g v �."v 5.�i Tv aY r CO 0 ^ � � A C � w m o z cc {N,�` Cli m o 0 N A C A g g C N c N A N ` A ` ^ ` N C ^ ` ^ C ^ ` A ` N C z N 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Q a a a a a 0 W as aaaaaaaaag acQ.a ac z z 'z 'z 3 3 z 3 z z 3 z z z z 3 z z z 3 z z z z z z z z z z z 'z z z 'z z z LL cc w a rp cc w o >o m w 2 p z Z N w p ~ v� 0 3 N g g � g � g �" g g g g"`""A g AA C ` N ` N ` Z [� 3 z N J Q w a a a a a a a a w aQ.a a a a a a a Q a a 4 a a Q Q Q a a a a z z z } Cl) } CD J a r N c N cl)ggLli � n mm�3;Ln N N 4) yr, aa) P, 4) r, m A a Q 2z m c 2 W z N J � p pV >ACV %V tV V�v tnAA A T V T + TZ p pp A / A O o Z uCi G - � a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a g a a a a U- z z z z z z z z 3 z z z 3 z z z z 3 z z z 3 z z 'z z z 'z z z 'z z z z 'z zz z zz O � Cl) � m a a N;° a a a a a a a a a a a a a.Q a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 7� z ? o co 3 3 333333z3'z3�Zz�zzzzzzzzzzzzzz W W � � � p o; g a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Q a a a a a a a a a d �, 0 �, z 33�Zzzzzzzzzz zZzzzzzzzz z W a J Q (n r r r r r r w 8 � moi, 8 P z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z W 0 0 0 0 0 0 c o �¢ E J � =� cc ri 0 I g s g 2 g 2 g 0 2 8 g °c g °c c € c i, n M c CO W z cc C3 C N Q g ggggg m g � mm m�c ug oo M gg g g Y U) gV)� o 9 0gg°o°cn4 uCl) nnnn .) .) vn c n c v n c V.Q O O W g T g g g g T g g$ g g 8 g C tn C = to C� o 0 o C a C c W r A A A n A �- A A n n. n A n n n n A A A W cn 2 N y y y N 1(�� tm7Ln tz V)g .. C T C Cl)T C v g T V C ^ C n A >. A T A T A >, � >. _ AA VVV g N �co � � r O W - ('3 p �3 � a c w o E Yd z z m a U w w w w w w ° m m Q cc cc m cc cc 0 8 7l z° 8 pz -E m g 'S ¢ W W m w W cc cc cc ¢ cr cr jt F- W t IL N li `i at u c�0 lC C N R a N m a N p N fA C7 Z m f- G7 N C3 a. C`3 a C7 t C3 Q C7 L7 Q U" t C) f (7 t (3 t E) t C9 + ('J p a[ ac C L t t L C aC M O L U E m L O L m O CO) co Yn v, H r a D> m? 7 3 > N U w Z .Q m¢ m m Q Z Q Z Z Z m 'Z ; m W 4 m td is ED UI 3 7 Q .� Q> Z? Z Z O o a� w p N U ro U w o t1 3 U is as co a ro is m N t? N t, W OI O N N t0 {p ap — w CO z N N � 0 N z N c Z C o cn U a c z 7 c c C. 3 m FY C, . . t LL Q C. � Cc a Z z z C _ z z m C J z w cA C A c 2 n c w c w 5 w o ¢ LO w > 0 o c o a: a w z N c O A w p A o A Z o w N q Ln N A O c N O C N w 3 0 Z c `cq y T i p c N QD A 8 N ri J C4 O � UU :9 d $ r p a v� co -� a ri o w Z ir m (D WcntL c _ > z N T ^ a. . . w (TJ p C N LO c Z C o cn U a c z 7 c c C. 3 m FY C, . . t ori voi W C r 65 �g t � � � X 'N l0 O u N LL O A - V T A " V T V T A � A � A � A " A A c A C A C A C A c A c A c A c A c.A C g g� 00 g A g S g 2 g 0 g A ° A g N =" 2" g" c N g N c c N o '= w w a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a "Q a z w} z z N g v m� c T °LA V �+ A 0 ° L c° gA A A A A z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 3 z z Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q a a a N a z z z z z z z z z z z z N z m Q C. � C Z C M C _ z z m C J F- cA C A c c n c w c n z 2` ¢ o c w o A o a: io O A c O A O c p A 0 o A c N A w N q c N A O c N A O C N A A O C M c `cq y T i p c Z QD A 8 m (n ON Q ri o WcntL c A T ^ Cj (TJ p C ori voi W C r 65 �g t � � � X 'N l0 O u N LL O A - V T A " V T V T A � A � A � A " A A c A C A C A C A c A c A c A c A c.A C g g� 00 g A g S g 2 g 0 g A ° A g N =" 2" g" c N g N c c N o '= w w a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a "Q a z w} z z N g v m� c T °LA V �+ A 0 ° L c° gA A A A A z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 3 z z Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q a a a N a z z z z z z z z z z z z N z A g g c cco c g A CF) c C o c c C. o C ^ C M C _ z z m C cA C A c c n c A g g c cco c g A CF) c C o c c W Q) 0 W w W a a O C7 a a a <¢ w 0 c� aQ -j m a: a: m UN Ir °' �- 0 g a � a's Q� w 5 Gal > + � j Z � Cl) 0 + C��7 ¢ + ccv v N Q Q Q . S' Z m FN-- ani H ¢ ' o Fes- y LL� ��. U > p > U Ll p O p O co O c0 U C td � m z t0 U O o O M r N N N N N O NQ) O If C. o C ^ C M C _ ` m C cA C A c c n c n c n c 9 c O c A o A o 2 c O A c O A O c p A cLn o A c N A c N q c N A O c N A O C N A A O C M c `cq y T i p c {� (^ y T A 8 m c A T ^ Cj (TJ p C g c tg0 tD r N W Q) 0 W w W a a O C7 a a a <¢ w 0 c� aQ -j m a: a: m UN Ir °' �- 0 g a � a's Q� w 5 Gal > + � j Z � Cl) 0 + C��7 ¢ + ccv v N Q Q Q . S' Z m FN-- ani H ¢ ' o Fes- y LL� ��. U > p > U Ll p O p O co O c0 U C td � m z t0 U O o O M r N N N N N O NQ) O If Section 8. Supplementary Regulations 15. A waiver is granted from Section 8.1.1 Parking on same lot insofar as it may be construed to hinder the C development of this Project as indicated on the site plan. 16. A waiver from Section 8.1.2 listing of Uses and Minimum Spaces is granted for Off -Street Parking to allow for the parking ratios indicated on the site plan with respect to the community buildings. 17. A waiver from Section 8.1.7 is granted which reads: A parking space shall mean an area of not less than 9'x18, accessible over an unobstructed driveway not less than 25' wide to allow for driveways of 24' wide and 20' wide as indicated on the site plan. 18. A waiver from Section's 8.1.8 is granted which reads: Formuld-family dwellings the front yard shall not be used for parking for accessory uses. A waiver from this section is granted in its entirety in as much as this section could be construed to"prohibit parking as indicated on the site plan. 19. A waiver from Section 8.1.9 is granted which reads: In all residential districts the front yard shall not be used for parking for accessory uses. A waiver is granted from this section in its entirety in as much as this section could be construed to prohibit parking as indicated on the site plan. 20. A waiver from Section 8.1.10 is granted which reads: In residence districts parking or outdoor storage of one (1) recreational vehicle (camper, etc.) and one (1) boat per dwelling may be permitted in an area to the rear of the front line of the building. All other recreational vehicle and boat storage (if any) shall be withing closed structures. A waiver is granted from this section in its in as -much as this section could be construed to 0 prohibit parking as indicated on the site plan. 21. A waiver from Section 8.1.14 is granted which reads: One (1) handicapped parking space shall be provided for every 20 parking spaces provided on site. The handicapped space shall be 12' x 20' and be indicated by a ground mounted sign and pavement markings. A waiver is granted from this section in its entirety to allow for the accessible spaces to meet the requirements of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 521 CMR the Architectural Access Board Regulations for accessible spaces. 22. A waiver from Section 8.3 Site Plan Review in its entirety is granted in as much as this Project is regulated by the requirements under a Comprehensive Permit (Chapter 40B) and are exempt from such review. 23. A waiver from Section 8.4 Screening and Landscaping Requirements for Oft Street Commercial and Industrial Districts (1987/12) is. A waiver is granted from this section in as much as this section could be construed to be applicable to this Project. 24. A waiver from Section 8.5 Planned Residential Development (PRD) is granted in its entirety since this Project is regulated by the requirements under a Comprehensive Permit (Chapter 40B) and are exempt from such review. 25. A waiver from Section 8.7 Growth Management is granted in its entirety in as much as this section could be construed to hinder the development of this Project. Page 18 of 19 O 0 c 26. A Waiver from Section 8.10 Lot/Slope Requirements is granted in its entirety in as much as this section could be construed to be applicable to this Project. A waiver is granted insofar as this section may be construed to hinder the development as indicated on the site plan. 27. Section 10 - Administration: A waiver from Section 10.3 Special Permit is granted in its entirety in as much as this section could be construed to be applicable to this Project. References are made to various special permit granting authorities that are in conflict with the requirements under a Comprehensive Permit (Chapter 40B) and this Project is exempt from such review. 28. Section 11 - Planned Development District: A waiver from Section 11 Planned Development District is granted in its entirety in as much as this section could be construed to be applicable to this Project. This Project is not located in an I -S district, is being submitted under the requirements of a Comprehensive Permit (Chapter 40B), and is exempt from such review. 29. Wetlands Bylaw A waiver from the Town of North Andover Wetlands Protection Bylaw, Chapter 178, and the regulations pertaining thereto, is granted with respect to: a. Disturbance in the 25' no disturbance zone (Section 3e(3)); b. Disturbance in the 50' no build zone (Section 3e(2)); and c. Disturbance in the 75' no build zone pertaining to vernal pools (Section 3a(4)). 30. SubdIVISIon Bylaw Awaiver from the Town of North Andover Subdivision Control Bylaw is granted. 31. Local Board of Health Bylaws A waiver from the Town of North Andover Board of Health Bylaw, as it pertains to this Project, is granted where it is more restrictive than the State Sanitary Code. 32. Bonds A waiver is granted from all Town of North Andover's regulations requirements for cash bonds related to this Project. In' lieu of such cash bonds, a letter of credit or other security agreed to by the Applicant and the North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals shall be provided at the time of the commencement of site work in the amount to be determined by the North Andover Department of Public Works, to cover the cost of the road opening within the public right of way, including the water and sewer connections. 33. Fees A waiver is granted for water and sewer connection fees associated with the 75 affordable units [see Specific Condition #29, Page 11 of 191. Page 19 of 19 NP +�v Town of North Andover Office. of the Zoning. Board of Appeals .� Community Development and Services Division 27 Charles Street North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 D. Robert Nicetta Building Coinrnissioner Notice of Decision Year 2003 Telephone (978) 688-91541 Fax (978) 688-9542 Any appeal shall be filed within (20) Property at 2357 Turnpike Street days after the date of filing of this notice in the office of the town clerk. NAME: Valley Realty Development, LLC DATE: January 14, 2003 ADDRESS: 231 Sutton St. Suite 2E -F PETITION: 2002-31 North Andover, MA 01845 HEARING: 07/09/02,08/1 09/10/02, 10/15/02, 10/22/02, 10/29/02, 11/12/02,12/10/02 The North Andover Board of Appeals held one public hearing in eight sessions for Town Boards' and Citizens' input. The public hearing was closed on December 10, 2002 by placing the petition "under advisement" for 40 days. The "under advisement" meeting, Tuesday, December 17, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. in the Conference Room, ? floor Town Nall, 120 Main Street, North Andover, Massachusetts, was opened for Board members to discuss the request for a comprehensive permit by Valley Realty Development, LLC, 231 Sutton Street, Suite 2E -F, North Andover, Massachusetts. This application was for 270 housingunits is per MGL Chap. 40B §§20-22. The housing is to have 27.78% of the units set aside as "affordable" in the R2 -Residential, and I-1 Industrial zones, located at 2357 Turnpike Street, North Andover, Massachusetts. The following members were present and voting: Walter F. Soule, Scott A. Karpinski, Ellen P. McIntyre, and George M. Earley. William Sullivan was not in attendence during the vote. Upon a motion by George M. Earley and seconded by Scott A. Karpinski, the Board voted to GRANT the Applicant the comprehensive permit pursuant to MGL Chap. 40B §§20-22 for 270 housing units of which 27.78% or 75 units will be affordable per the following preliminary plans: Prepared by Sheet Title Rev. Date a GSD Associates, Inc. COVERSHEET 12/03102- b GSD Associates, Inc. SP -1 SITE BOUNDARY AND PRELIMINARY 12/03/02 SUBDIVISION PLAN c GSD Associates, Inc. SP -2 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS 12/03/02 d GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -1A e GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C-1 B f GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -1C Og GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. -Mass. C -2A EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 12/03/02 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 12/03/02 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 12/03/02 SITE DEVELOPMENT AND GRADING PLAN 12/06/02 BOARD OI< APPE,US 6X3 954I I UILD.ING 638-954_`• CONSEi'V:'�TlOi u33-9i3p FIE:iI:TH 699-9540 PL:zY�di\•C} 033-9_:'', i Town of North Andover Office of the Zoning Board of Appeals Community Development and Services Division 27 Charles Street North Andover, Massachusetts 01845 D. Robert Nicetta Building Commissioner Date 7 r 0 LO -I— TO: Town of North Andover Zoning Board of Appeals 27 Charles Street North Andover MA 01845 Telephone (978) 688-9541 Fax (978) 688-9542 Please be advised that I have agreed to waive the time constraints for the Zoning Board of Appeals to make a decision regarding the granting of a Variance and /or Special Permit; or Finding for property located at: GO M P9cK6VSIUE PC" l T STREET: o� 3� Tv iZnl l (�-6 TOWN: No. MEETING DATE(S): wbooe2 /O/V/0121- NAME OF PETITIONER: U ��G 54. 1 Signed: 1 1� 1 WAIVER BOARD OF ALS 688-9541 SEP 10 2002 \RD OF APPEALS � C_ (or petitioner's representative) _ o . coc CO w � cfl BUILDING 688-9545 CONSERVATION 688-9530 HEALTH 688-9540 PLANNING 688-9535 NORTHPOINT Realty Development Pa Box 3039 Andover, MA of 8 i o (978) 470-8257 } SOUTHPO1NT N uov�r�oy,��,,,,b,,��,t 185 NE 6th Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33483 (561) 272-9958 Date: September 26, 2002 To: Thomas Laudani, en llastrino, Gregg Smith and Steve Trettel From: Gerry -Lynn Darcy Re: Fire/Emergency . afety — The Meadows cc: Chief Dolan, Heidi Griffin, Kathleen McKenna, Lt. Melnikas, Robert Nicetta, William Sullivan This morning I had a meeting to discuss the Meadows with North Andover Fire Chief Dolan, Lt. Melnikas and North Andover Planner, Kathleen McKenna. It seemed to be a very productive session, and I do believe that we can come to a mutually acceptable agreement on fire and emergency safety for the proposed 270 unit complex. As we all know, the Town is under equipped with respect to fire safety facilities and this fact makes it extremely difficult for the Fire Department to respond to emergencies that are far removed from any of the fire houses in the Town. The location of the Meadows is on the Town line and it is quite a distance from the closest fire house. With this being said I do think that it is important for us to make the necessary precautions in the event of a public safety emergency. I was asked if we would consider installing (acceptable) portable defibrillators throughout the complex, while additionally providing access to the community centers for local training courses to promote public safety and to expand public knowledge. a Chief Dolan understood that we did not, have viable land area available for potential satellite public safety offices, but he thought that we might be able to provide the Town with the ability to use the community center in the upper and lower meadows for training based sessions. I do support this idea and feel that it should be addressed at our next team meeting. Chief Dolan is also going to forward information on where to obtain the defibrillators as soon as it is received. SEP 2 7 2002 Di BOARD OF APPEALS Nom^• -04-02 12:57P UV' _ PMA .20 I 1Z Jane Swift James H. Scanlan John Cogliano 71MWAY Governor Secretary Acting Commissioner September 30, 2002 Robert Durand, Secretary Executive Office of Environmental Affairs �. 'fir j ► '. 251 Causeway Street, 9"' Floor �� f Boston, Ma 02114 ;,?� n(',i oil {ZF North Andover- The Meadows- Expanded ETTF (EDEA #12683) ATTN: MEPA [)nit Nicholas Zavolas Dear Secretary Durand: The Massachusetts Highway Department (MassHighway) has reviewed the Expanded Envirotunental Notification Form for The Meadows project in North Andover. The prgject entails the development of 270 residential condominiums/townhouses. The project is located on a 1.47.14 -acre site on the southwestern side of Route 114 at the North Andover/Middleton Town Linc. Based on information contained in the Expanded ENF, the project is expected to approximately 1,514 new vehicle trips on an average weekday. A Massliighway permit is required for access to Route 114. The Expanded ENF included a traffic study performed in accordance with EOEA/EOTC guidelines for traffic assesstnents. We believe that the Expanded ENP has adequately addressed all state highway traffic issues related to The Meadows project, and we recorrunend that no further environmental review be required based on traffic issues. The proponent has proposed to access the site via two ttnsignalized driveways on Route 114. The proponent should coordinate with MassHighway to ensure that the proposes, site drivewaysare cl-zF:ign�d..^.;C;i;,i, to 1,14fiSSi 1ir,�•iiwily yiaituaius and do uoi adversely iirlpact traflts; operations on Route 114. Also, the proponent has proposed to widen Sharpner's Pond Road to provide an exclusive right -turn lane. We believe that the proposed widening is not warranted given the low volume of traffic on Sharpner's Pond Road. The details of these, or any access -related issues can be handled during the Massi-lighway access pen -nit process for this project. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at (617) 973-7341 or Kristina loltnson of dw Public/.Private Development Unit at (617) 973-7342. �ECE E U NOU 6 ' 20 assachusetts Highway Department • Ten Park Plaza, Boston, MA 02116-3973 • (617) 973-7800 BOARD OF APPEALS 0