HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-09-03 Planning Board Supplemental Materials (16) ,paPiuu �n"ps
Q�N%PMlidt/,u;ir�+w�lm
J ' t
POST RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME
RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE
COMPLETION REPORT
FOR DISPOSAL SITE LOCATED AT:
498 CHICKERING ROAD
NORTH ANDOVER, MASSACHUSETTS
MASsDEP RTN 3-3454
PREPARED FOR:
PARK STREET REDEVELOPMENT, LLC
231 SUTTON STREET
NORTH ANDOVER, MA
PREPARED BY:
SIMMONS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
213 ELM STREET
SALISBURY, MA 01952
978-463-6669 —FAX: 978-463-6679
infogsimmons2l e.com
www.simmons2le.com
FEBRUARY 2013
PROJECT#120310
,paPiuu �n�"Ne
J ' t
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 DISPOSAL SITE AND PROPERTY INFORMATION 3
2.1 MCP GROUNDWATER CLASSIFICATION 4
2.2 MCP SOIL CLASSIFICATION 4
2.3 DISPOSAL SITE HISTORY 5
3.0 RAM ACTIVITIES 5
3.1 SOIL RECYCLING HAVERHILL LANDFILL-AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2012 6
3.2 SOIL RECYCLING NASHUA LANDFILL-OCTOBER 2012 6
3.3 SOIL RECYCLING NASHUA LANDFILL-NOVEMBER 2012 7
3.4 SOIL RECYCLING NASHUA LANDFILL-JANUARY 2013 7
3.5 DRAINAGE SYSTEM GROUNDWATER MONITORING-JANUARY 2013 7
4.0 MANAGEMENT OF REMEDIAL WASTE 9
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLANS 9
6.0 REQUIRED PERMITS 10
7.0 LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONAL OPINION 10
FIGURES
Figure 1 —Site Locus
Figure 2—RAM Completion Site Plan
Figure 3 MassGIS Site Scoring Map
APPENDIX
Laboratory Reports
Groundwater Analyses (catch basin) December 2012
,pa/iiuu �n"Ne
J ' t
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Simmons Environmental Services, Inc. (SIMMONS) has prepared the following Release
Abatement Measure (RAM) Completion Report on behalf of the PARK STREET REDEVELOPMENT,
LLC. This RAM involved remedial waste (soil), that was removed and recycled offsite as part of
a redevelopment of the property located at 498 Chickering Rd., North Andover, MA. The
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) had previously assigned
three Release Tracking Number (RTNs) i.e. 3-3454, 3-26053, and 3-26327 at this location. RTN
3-26053 pertained to the release of gasoline from underground storage tanks while RTN 3-26327
pertained to releases of arsenic, chromium, and nickel associated with the former waste oil tank
and an oil/water separator. A Class A-3 Response Action Outcome (RAO) Statement that linked
all of these disposal sites within the main RTN 3-3454 was previously submitted to MassDEP on
July 23, 2008.
This RAM was conducted as a post RAO measure for excavation and offsite recycling of
approximately 2500 cubic yards (cyds) of remedial waste generated principally from regrading
that was removed as part of the redevelopment of the property. The RAM Plan was submitted to
MassDEP on July 31, 2012. A RAM Plan Modification for off-site recycling of an additional
soil volume was submitted to MassDEP on October 29, 2012.
The property where this disposal site is located was previously operated as a gasoline service
station from the 1930s until approximately 2004. It has been redeveloped with a new building as
a Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank branch office. The former gas station building was
demolished. These disposal sites are not located within any drinking water areas or applicable
distance of any sensitive environmental receptors as defined within the Massachusetts
Contingency plan (MCP).
1
POST RAO RAM COMPLETION REPORT
498 CHICKERING ROAD,NORTH ANDOVER,MA
MASsDEP RTN 3-3454
,pa/iiuu �n"Ne
J ' t
A total of 1892.07 tons of petroleum contaminated soil was transported offsite under a Bill of
Lading (BOL) to the Haverhill Landfill for reuse as cover during August and early September
2012. However, due to closure of that landfill on September 7, 2012, offsite recycling of the
remaining soil was managed under three separate under BOLs to the Nashua Landfill in Nashua,
NH. Between October 1, 2012 and January 9, 2013 a total of 1,719.14 tons of remedial waste
associated with regrading was transported offsite under three separate BOLs to the Nashua
Landfill for reuse as cover. The total volume of soil (remedial waste) removed for offsite
recycling under this RAM is 3,611.21 tons.
2
POST RAO RAM COMPLETION REPORT
498 CHICKERING ROAD,NORTH ANDOVER,MA
MASsDEP RTN 3-3454
,pa/iiuu �n"Ne
J ' t
2.0 DISPOSAL SITE AND PROPERTY INFORMATION
The disposal site is a commercial property that was previously operated as a gasoline service
station between the 1930s and 2004. It has now been redeveloped as a branch office of the
Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank. This parcel is located within a General Business District area.
The former gas station building and all underground storage tanks (USTs), service lines, and
dispensing equipment were removed from the property by others. The new bank building is
heated by a natural gas fired system and connected to public water supply and sewerage.
Figure 1 is a Site Locus based on the 7.5' U.S.G.S quadrangle map for Lawrence, MA. Figure 2
is a Site Plan showing the former gas station building, former waste oil UST and oil/water
separator areas, the current bank building, and the newly installed underground utilities for the
property. The disposal site boundaries for RTN 3-3454 encompass the entirety of Lot 26 as
shown on Figure 2 and partially extend into the Massachusetts State Highway (Route 125) right-
of-way. As shown on the Site Plan (Figure 2), Lot 26 is the property as described within the
Activity and Use Limitation (AUL) that was implemented for the entire disposal site area in
2008. The disposal site and AUL area did not include Lot 24-2, which has now been added to
create Lot 26-A. Lot 24-2 was a small parcel to the west that is now part of the bank parking and
landscape areas.
The disposal site property where the RAM activities were conducted is abutted by Franklin
Street to the north, Chickering Road to the east, Park Street to the south, and residential property
to the west. The disposal site is not located within any current or foreseeable drinking water
resource areas or within applicable distance to any sensitive environmental receptors.
The soils within the disposal site area generally consisted of silt and sand. No bedrock was
encountered. The contaminants of concern at the disposal site were gasoline based compounds
and three metals, i.e. arsenic, chromium, and nickel.
3
POST RAO RAM COMPLETION REPORT
498 CHICKERING ROAD,NORTH ANDOVER,MA
MASsDEP RTN 3-3454
,pa/iiuu �n"Ne
J ' t
According to the MassDEP Priority Resource Map, the closest surface water body to the disposal
site is Stevens Pond, located approximately 2200 feet to the east. The disposal site is not located
within a MassDEP Approved Zone II, an Interim Wellhead Protection Area, a Potentially
Productive Aquifer, or any other current or potential drinking water resource areas. Drinking
water for the North Andover area is derived from Lake Cochichewick, a Class A surface water
body located 2.2 miles to the northeast. There are no Areas of Critical Environmental Concern
(ACEC) or NHESP Estimated Habitats of Rare Wetlands Wildlife within I/4 mile of the disposal
site, and no wetland areas within 500 feet of the disposal site. The North Andover Middle
School designated as Protected Open Space is located approximately 200 feet to the south across
Park and Main Streets.
2.1 MCP Groundwater Classification
Groundwater in the disposal site area is not within applicable distances to any current or
potential drinking water resources as defined in 310 CMR 40.0932. Depth to groundwater in the
disposal site area varies between 3 to 8 feet below surface grade depending upon location and
seasonal fluctuations. Because an occupied structure exists at this disposal site that involved
petroleum releases to soil and groundwater and the depth of groundwater is less than 15 feet,
groundwater (exposure) category GW-2 applies to the site. Groundwater category GW3 applies
to all disposal sites throughout the Commonwealth. Therefore, groundwater is classified within
exposure categories GW2 and GW3.
2.2 MCP Soil Classification
In accordance with 310 CMR 40.0933, soil at the disposal site is classified as soil category S-3
because the frequency of use by adults is high and children are not present, the intensity of use by
adults is low, and the depth of contamination is potentially accessible or isolated. Based upon
these criteria, disposal site soils are classified as S-3 soils for the interval at 0-15 feet below
grade surface (bgs) that are and will remain covered by either pavement or building structure.
Therefore, in conjunction with the groundwater category, the applicable soil exposure categories
are S-3/GW-2 and S-3/GW-3.
4
POST RAO RAM COMPLETION REPORT
498 CHICKERING ROAD,NORTH ANDOVER,MA
MASsDEP RTN 3-3454
,pa/iiuu �n"Ne
J ' t
2.3 Disposal Site History
Assessment activities at this location have included the installation of groundwater monitoring
wells with soil sample collection, soil vapor monitoring, and routine groundwater gauging and
sampling activities. Remedial response actions at the disposal site have included the removal of
all USTs, service lines, and dispensing equipment as well as excavation and off-site recycling of
petroleum-impacted soil. Groundwater Environmental Services, Inc (GES) submitted a Class A-
3 RAO in July 2008 for RTNs 3-3454, 3-26053, and 3-26327. Based on assessment activities
conducted by GES concerning historical releases of petroleum compounds and arsenic in the
vicinity of a former underground waste oil tank, GES concluded, following a Method 3 risk
characterization, that the disposal site had achieved a condition of no significant risk of harm to
health, safety,public welfare, and the environment provided that future exposures to affected soil
were restricted by an Activity and Use Limitation (AUL). The AUL as recorded at the Essex
North Registry of Deeds included the entire parcel at that time i.e. Lot 26. As shown on the Site
Plan (Figure 2), the current bank building was developed on two separate lots that have now
been merged i.e. Lot 26, the parcel where the gasoline station was located and Lot 24-2 that was
outside the disposal site and AUL areas. To provide clarity, Simmons plans to terminate the
existing AUL and immediately record a new AUL that correctly shows that the disposal site and
AUL area are a portion of the newly created Lot 26-A.
3.0 RAM ACTIVITIES
The purpose of the RAM Plan was to conduct excavation and offsite recycling of contaminated
soil being removed for grading purposes and installation of the proposed bank building
foundation, drainage structures, and utility trenching areas. The maximum depth of soil removal
was generally 4 feet and above the static groundwater table. The areas of excavation for the
bank building foundation and underground utilities are shown on the RAM Site Plan (Figure 2).
Between 1 and 3 feet of soil across the entire disposal site area was also removed for regrading
purposes. Because these soils were generated from a disposal site, these were managed as
remedial waste although none of the pre-characterization data showed exceedances of Method 1
cleanup standards. The areas where GES encountered metals above Method 1 standards were
5
POST RAO RAM COMPLETION REPORT
498 CHICKERING ROAD,NORTH ANDOVER,MA
MASsDEP RTN 3-3454
,pa/iiuu �n"Ne
J ' t
isolated at the former waste oil UST and the former oil/water separator at depths between 6-10
feet. Regrading activities associated with redevelopment of this property did not disturb these
soils. Post excavation soil samples were not collected because the risk reduction measures
associated with this RAM did not significantly affect site conditions or the conclusions within
the previous Class A-3 RAO.
On August 24, 2012, William A. Simmons, LSP of SIMMONS provided a written response to
Jennifer Wang of MassDEP regarding questions concerning the RAM Plan activities and the
omission of a feasibility evaluation to achieve or approach background. SIMMONS confirmed
that the proposed risk reduction activities i.e. the RAM Plan would not affect the former waste
oil and oil/water separator and that the soil removed from regrading activities would be managed
as remedial waste. Based upon that correspondence, MassDEP was satisfied that the information
supporting this RAM Plan was complete.
3.1 Soil Recycling Haverhill Landfill—August/September 2012
The original amount of petroleum contaminated soil removal for the original RAM Plan was
estimated to be 1,000 cyds. In early July 2012, SIMMONS personnel advanced 15 shallow
borings on this site to collect and analyze soil samples for prequalification acceptance by
disposal facilities. The locations of those borings and the analytical data for the parameters
comprehended within BWSC Policy Comm 97-01 for the samples were provided in the Soils
Management Plan that was appended to the original RAM Plan submittal on July 31, 2012.
Those results showed that the site soils were suitable for reuse at an unlined landfill. A volume
totaling 1,892.07 tons was transported under a BOL for reuse as cover to the Haverhill Landfill.
The completed BOL was submitted to MassDEP on September 14, 2012.
3.2 Soil Recycling Nashua Landfill—October 2012
Due to structurally unsuitable soils that were encountered and additional soil that was removed
for regrading, the proposed amount of disposal soil for offsite disposal or recycling was
increased to an estimated 2,500 cubic yards. On September 11, 2012, SIMMONS personnel
6
POST RAO RAM COMPLETION REPORT
498 CHICKERING ROAD,NORTH ANDOVER,MA
MASsDEP RTN 3-3454
,pa/iiuu �n"Ne
J ' t
collected soil samples from four test pits (TP1/lA, TP-2/2A, TP3/3A, TP4/4A) on this site for
prequalification acceptance by the Nashua Landfill. The results from that testing were provided
within the subsequent RAM Plan Modification submittal to MassDEP. Between October 1 and
23, 2012, a total of 785.78 tons of remedial waste (soil) associated with site regrading was
transported offsite under a BOL to the Nashua Landfill for reuse as cover. The completed BOL
was submitted to MassDEP on January 24, 2013.
3.3 Soil Recycling Nashua Landfill—November 2012
On October 24, 2012, SIMMONS personnel collected soil samples from additional test pits
(TP5, TP6, TP7, TP8) on this site for prequalification acceptance by the Nashua Landfill
disposal facility to accommodate an increased volume of remedial waste associated with
regrading. The results from that testing were provided within the RAM Plan Modification
submittal to MassDEP. Between November 5 and 9, 2012, a total of 870.93 tons of petroleum
contaminated soil was transported offsite under a BOL to the Nashua Landfill for reuse as cover.
The completed BOL was submitted to MassDEP on January 24, 2013.
3.4 Soil Recycling Nashua Landfill—January 2013
During the final stages of the property redevelopment, drainage issues were encountered that
required installation of a subsurface trench drainage system in the western portion of the
property. On December 21, 2012, SIMMONS personnel collected soil samples from another test
pit (TP9) on this site for prequalification acceptance by the Nashua Landfill disposal facility to
accommodate additional soil that was to be removed for installation of the trench drainage
system. The BOL with the laboratory analyses for this offsite soil recycling was submitted to
MassDEP on January 3, 2013. On January 9, 2013, a total of 62.43 tons of petroleum
contaminated soil was transported offsite under a BOL to the Nashua Landfill for reuse as cover.
3.5 Drainage System Groundwater Monitoring—January 2013
In January 2013, a subsurface trench drainage system was installed below the pavement areas in
the southern portion of the disposal site to alleviate the poor drainage soil conditions that were
occurring in that area. The subsurface drainage trenches were constructed with crushed stone
7
POST RAO RAM COMPLETION REPORT
498 CHICKERING ROAD,NORTH ANDOVER,MA
MASsDEP RTN 3-3454
,pa/iiuu �n"Ne
J ' t
and perforated PVC pipe that extended four feet below grade. These were connected to an
adjacent catch basin that discharged to the municipal storm drainage system in Chickering Road.
To ensure that groundwater draining from trench drain system would not have an adverse impact
on the municipal storm drainage system, Simmons reviewed groundwater data collected by GES
during 2006 and 2007 from the waste oil UST and oil/water separator and confirmed that these
concentrations were below applicable Method 1 GW3 standards that are protective of surface
water. GES described the results of groundwater analyses from the area as "a minimum of 1-2
orders of magnitude below existing Method 1 Groundwater Standards." Thereafter, SIMMONS
collected water samples from the drainage system on January 11, 2013, for laboratory analyses
of volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH) fractions with target volatile organic compounds
(VOCs), extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) fractions with polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs), and RCRA 5 dissolved metals. As shown in the enclosed laboratory
report, there were no detectable concentrations of VPH or EPH fractions, VOCs, or PAHs. The
reported concentrations of dissolved metals were consistent with GES's previous data i.e. either
below the laboratory methods' limits' or significantly less than current the Method 1 GW3
standards. The results of groundwater analyses showed that off site discharge of drainage is
consistent with the requirements for discharges of non-reportable concentrations of oil or
hazardous materials as provided with 310 CMR 40.0045(6).
Laboratory data for these groundwater samples is provided as an appendix to this RAM
Completion report.
8
POST RAO RAM COMPLETION REPORT
498 CHICKERING ROAD,NORTH ANDOVER,MA
MASsDEP RTN 3-3454
,pa/iiuu �n"Ne
J ' t
4.0 MANAGEMENT OF REMEDIAL WASTE
All remedial waste generated from this RAM to date has been managed offsite for reuse under
BOLs at the Haverhill Landfill in Haverhill, MA and/or Nashua Landfill in Nashua, NH. A total
of 1892.07 tons was transported under a BOL to the Haverhill Landfill between August 16 and
September 7, 2012. A total of 1719.14 tons was transported under three BOLs to the Nashua
Landfill between October 1, 2012 and January 9, 2013. There is no remedial waste remaining at
the disposal site or at any temporary storage area.
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLANS
On an as needed basis, SIMMONS personnel or designated representatives were offite to
observe excavation and loading activities of the disposal site contaminated soil to ensure
adherence to the Soils Management Plan. Ambient air samples were screened near the property
boundaries with an organic vapor analyzer during excavation activities in accordance with the
Site Health and Safety Plan (See original RAM Plan Appendix). No readings above the
instruments limits of detection were observed. Post excavation samples were not collected since
the outcome of the RAM activities were not expected to and did not significantly affect the site
conditions or the conclusions provided in the previously submitted Class A3 RAO statement for
this disposal site. The excavation activities did not include soil containing heavy metals that
were associated with the former waste oil UST and/or the former oil/water separator, which were
the contaminants of concern that necessitated the AUL. These contaminants were previously
identified at 6 to 10 feet below grade surface. The excavation activities in these areas were
limited to cut and fill activities for final site grading and typically ranged between 1 and 3 feet
below surface grade. Depth of excavation for installation of footings and utilities typically
ranged around 4 feet below surface grade. Therefore, these post RAO RAM activities did not
involve disturbance of soils previously documented to contain heavy metals and these activities
did not alter the conclusions presented in the original Method 3 Risk Characterization or the
9
POST RAO RAM COMPLETION REPORT
498 CHICKERING ROAD,NORTH ANDOVER,MA
MASsDEP RTN 3-3454
,pa/iiuu �n"Ne
J ' t
Class A-3 RAO. As described in the RAM Plan and Modification Reports, the observed
concentrations of all of the contaminants within BWSC Policy Comm 0097 were not above any
applicable Method 1 S1 standards within the limits of the areas excavated within this RAM.
6.0 REQUIRED PERMITS
None were deemed necessary other than underground utility clearances through Digsafe. The
responsible party, Park Street Redevelopment, LLC, had the financial capability to complete all
the response actions proposed in this RAM Plan and Modification. An attachment authorizing
William A. Simmons, LSP, to manage all aspects of remedial waste activities including
certification of financial ability to complete this RAM was submitted to MassDEP with the
October 2012 RAM Plan Modification.
7.0 LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONAL OPINION
William A. Simmons, LSP. J.D., License Number 1847, is the Licensed Site Professional (LSP)
for submittal of this post RAO RAM Completion Report concerning RTN's 3-3454, 3-26053,
and 3-36327. The LSP seal and signature are provided on the original BWSC Transmittal Form
106 that is being submitted with this document. This RAM Completion Report contains material
facts, data, and other information that support the LSP Opinion that, to the best of the LSP's
knowledge, information, and belief that the response actions which are the subject of this
submittal: (i) have been developed and implemented in accordance with the applicable
provisions of MGL c. 2 1 E and 310 CMR 40.0000 et seq.; (ii) are appropriate and reasonable to
accomplish the purposes of such response actions as set forth in applicable provisions of MGL c.
2 1 E and 310 CMR 40.0000 et seq.; and (iii) comply with the identified provisions of all orders,
permits, and approvals identified within this submittal.
10
POST RAO RAM COMPLETION REPORT
498 CHICKERING ROAD,NORTH ANDOVER,MA
MASsDEP RTN 3-3454
(jtpMkg aiuJ ;
f
YrirIw rIrm"rIu,,l''v° Lrrr
FIGURE I
SITE LOCUS MAP
�..
l {
1✓� . .° �iun y / � ��u xy �'Wiw uyrr � ° � ,. �"'"i .. °.
�e:: w u,
"
/�„ ��'r '✓ / �r./ /1� '/uwr w ,.om.,° °° r Ja wf/,J�J * V'1r `Y,'"W p'"r,�6R,i
498 CHICKERING ROAD
NORTH ANDOVER, MA
QUADRANGLE: LAWRENCE,MA
LATITUDE: 420 41' 37" UTM: 4 728 787N
LONGITUDE: 71007113" 326 308 E
MAP SCALE: 1:25 000 PROJECT#120310
N4 hfoe
DC ❑ DbLdi Cbtjo O
EN 1 Q Esbjo Nboi prfi
Wu35.3
Fydruefe ❑ DC
g3pn \
EjtgptbmTjJ
boe \
BVMbsfb
Gpsn f s
Xbtd Pjm; \
V TU ..............
Of \ 163
Tvctvsgbdf Gpsn fsHbt Of \ Q
Usf odi Gpsn f s Tibypo NpX f mGj ud x
Esbjobhf Pjr®Cbrfs GV re1 oh
TztLfn Tfgbsbrps:- ; 1 Cbol
Cv j J \\ O
E re oh A
---- --�--- ------------j I �\ N�
— -- --- Xb�fsTfsvjdf
--- -----I \ (51
U- TfxfsTfsvjdf
U- T Esbjo
U) 0........ -► om-_�; —4►----- —�-- Nboiprfi
: )EN I ' �r�no
D
Wu37 Cbtjo
Bdt\4LY-boe Vtf )DC' •' SBN Fydbvbypo ��- Tzt rf no
Uj Mnjtbypo )BV MY BsfbgDs i
B Sf b Cif rsprhv n DC jr E N I
DporbnjobLfe DC
Tpjn)3117'
DI JDL FSJOH SPBE )SPVUF 236*
GJH VS F 3 Ti px j oh Mpu 37.B
)Mpu 37.B Jodrmef t Mpu 37 ' Mpu 35.3*
SBN DPN QMFUJPOTJUF QMBO
Gps C spgf su?BU
5' 9 DI JDL FSJOH SPBE- OPSUI BOEPV\FS- N BTTBDI VTFUUT
C sf gbsf e Cz;
TJN N POT FOWJSPON FOUBMTFSWJDFT-JOD/
324 F m TLsf f u•Tbrp c v sz-N B 12: 63
): 89*574.777:
Ebd; Gfcsvbsz 3124 Tdbrfi; 2n>511 Csplddu$; 231421 Esbgfe; TI M
Map Output Page | nf|
MassDEP - Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup
Site Name: MCP Numerical Ranking System Map: 500 feet & 0.5 Mile Radii
498 CHICKERING ROAD
North Andover,MA
NAD83 MA Co ordinates: The information shown on this map is the
231158ni 938256ni best available at the date of printing.For MassOEP
more information please refer to
July 3,2012 AMC— www.mass.gov/mqis/massqis.htm
it
1`4A 0 "I 11'�'
Z.
h SIN,
Roads Limited Access,Di 1cled,Other Hwy,Major Road,Minor Road,Track,Trail PWS Protection Areas.Zone 11,IWPA,Zone A...........
Hydrography:Open Water,PWS Reservoir,Tidal Flat I=E=
Boundaries:Town,County,DEP Region.Train.Powerline.Pipeline.Aqueduct
Basins:Major,Sub.Streams:Perennial,Intermittent,Man Made Shore,Dam FEMA 1 00yr Floodplain.Protected Open Space.ACEC ....
Aquifers:Medium Yield,High Yield,EPA Sole Source......===NHESP:Est Rare Weland Habitat.Certified Vernal Pool...
Non Potential Drinking Water Source Area:Medium,High(Yield)... DEP Permitted Solid Waste Landfill.....................
http://maps.massgis.state.ma.us/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=matow... 7/3/2012
N oil B
REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
NETLAB Case Number ZOIII-18
Prepared for:
Attn: William Simmons
Simmons Environmental
213 Elm Street
Salisbury, MA 01952
Report Date: January 17, 2013
Lab 9 RI010
NEW ENGLAND TESTING LABORATORY, INC.
1254 Douglas Avenue,North Providence,RI 02904
(401)353-3420
Total 4 of Pages: 18
MassDEP Analytical Protocol Certification Form
Laboratory Name: New England Testing Laboratory, Inc. Project#: 120310
Project Location: 498 Chickering Road RTN:
This Form provides certifications for the following data set: list Laboratory Sample ID Number(s):
Z0111-18
Matrices: x Groundwater/Surface Water Soil/Sediment Drinking Water Air Other:
CAM Protocol (check all that apply below):
8260 VOC 7470/7471 Hg MassDEP VPH 8081 Pesticides 7196 Hex Cr MassDEP APH
CAM 11 A CAM III B CAM IV A x CAM V B CAM VI B CAM IX A
8270 SVOC 7010 Metals MassDEP EPH 8151 Herbicides 8330 Explosives TO-15 VOC
CAM II B CAM III C CAM IV B x CAM V C CAM VIII A CAM IX B
9014 Total
6010 Metals 6020 Metals 8082 PCB Cyanide/PAC 6860 Perchlorate
CAM III A x CAM III D CAM V A CAM VI A CAM VIII B
Affirmative Responses to Questions A through F are required for"Presumptive Certainty"status
Were all samples received in a condition consistent with those described on the Chain-of-
Custody, properly preserved (including temperature) in the field or laboratory, and x Yes No
prepared/analyzed within method holding times?
Were the analytical method(s) and all associated QC requirements specified in the selected
B CAM protocol(s)followed? x Yes No
C Were all required corrective actions and analytical response actions specified in the selected x Yes No
CAM protocol(s) implemented for all identified performance standard non-conformances?
Does the laboratory report comply with all the reporting requirements specified in CAM VII A,
D "Quality Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines for the Acquisition and Reporting of x Yes No
Analytical Data"?
VPH, EPH, APH, and TO-15 only:
a. VPH, EPH, and APH Methods only: Was each method conducted without significant x Yes No
E modification(s)? (Refer to the individual method(s)for a list of significant modifications).
b. APH and TO-15 Methods only: Was the complete analyte list reported for each method? Yes No
Were all applicable CAM protocol QC and performance standard non-conformances identified
F and evaluated in a laboratory narrative (including all "No" responses to Questions A through E)? x Yes No
Responses to Questions G, H and I below are required for "Presumptive Certainty"status—F Were the reporting limits at or below all CAM reporting limits specified in the selected CAM '
C' protocol(s)? x Yes No
Data User Note: Data that achieve "Presumptive Certainty"status may not necessarily meet the data usability and
representativeness requirements described in 310 CMR 40. 1056(2)(k)and WSC-07-350.
FH Were all QC performance standards specified in the CAM protocol(s) achieved? x Yes No'
Were results reported for the complete analyte list specified in the selected CAM protocol(s)? x Yes No'
'All negative responses must be addressed in an attached laboratory narrative.
1, the undersigned, attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my personal inquiry of those
responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this analytical report is, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, accurate and complete.
Signature, Position: Laboratory Director
Printed Name: Richard Warila Date: 1/17/2013
age o 18
SAMPLES SUBMITTED and REQUEST FOR ANALYSIS:
The samples listed in Table I were submitted to New England Testing Laboratory on
January 11, 2013. The group of samples appearing in this report was assigned an internal
identification number(case number) for laboratory information management purposes. The
client's designations for the individual samples, along with our case numbers, are used to identify
the samples in this report. This report of analytical results pertains only to the sample(s)provided
to us by the client which are indicated on the custody record. The case number for this sample
submission is ZO111-18.
Custody records are included in this report.
Site: 498 Chickering Road
TABLE I, Samples Submitted
Sample ID Date Sampled Matrix Analysis Requested
Catch Basin 1/11/13 Water Table II
TABLE II,Analysis and Methods
ANALYSIS PREPARATION METHOD DETERMINATIVE METHOD
EPH NA
VPH NA
Dissolved Metals
Arsenic 3005A 6010C
Barium 3005A 6010C
Beryllium 3005A 6010C
Chromium 3005A 6010C
Nickel 3005A 6010C
These methods are documented in:
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846,USEPA/OSW.
*Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons(VPH),MADEP.
**Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH),MADEP.
NELTLLAB
New England Testing Laboratory, Inc.
Page 3 of 18
CASE NARRATIVE:
Sample Receipt
The samples were all appropriately cooled and preserved upon receipt. The samples were
received in the appropriate containers. The chain of custody was adequately completed
and corresponded to the samples submitted.
EPH
All samples were extracted and analyzed within method specified holding times and
according to NETLAB's documented standard operating procedures. The results for the
associated calibration, method blank and laboratory control sample (LCS)were within
method specified quality control criteria.
Metals
All analyses were performed according to NETLAB's documented Standard Operating
Procedures, within all required holding times, and with appropriate quality control
measures. All QC was within laboratory established acceptance criteria. The samples
were received,processed, and reported with no anomalies.
The sample for dissolved metals analysis was filtered upon receipt to the laboratory.
VPH
All samples were analyzed within method specified holding times and according to
NETLAB's documented standard operating procedures. The results for the associated
calibration, method blank and laboratory control sample (LCS) were within method
specified quality control criteria.
Page 4 of 18
RESULTS: EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM
HYDROCARBONS
Results for EPH analysis are presented in the following section. Each page is
electronically signed.
Page 5 of 18
APPENDIX 3:REQUIRED EPH DATA REPORTING FORMATANFORMATION
SAMPLE INFORMATION
Matrix X Aqueous Soil Sediment Other:
Containers X Satisfactory Broken Leaking:
Aqueous Preservatives N/A X pH<2 H>2 Comment:
Temperature X Received on Ice Received at 4° C Other:
Extraction Method Water: Separatory Funnel Soil: N/A
EPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Method for Ranges:MADEP EPH 04-1.1 Client ID Catch Basin
Method for Target Analytes: Lab ID ZOI I I-18
EPH Surrogate Standards Date Collected 1/11/13
Aliphatic: Chlorooctadecane Date Received 1/11/13
Aromatic: o-Terphenyl Date Extracted 1/15/13
EPH Fractionation Surrogates Date Analyzed 1/15/13
2-Fluorobiphenyl Dilution Factor 1X
2-Bromonaphthalene %Moisture(soil) N/A
RANGE/TARGET ANALYTE RL Units
Unadjusted Cl 1-C22 Aromatics' 150 ug/L <150
Naphthalene 1.0 ug/L <1.0
Diesel PAH 2-Methylnaphthalene 1.0 ug/L <1.0
Analytes Phenanthrene 1.0 ug/L <1.0
Acenaphthene 5.0 ug/L <5.0
Acenaphthylene 1.0 ug/L <1.0
Fluorene 5.0 ug/L <5.0
Anthracene 5.0 ug/L <5.0
Fluoranthene 5.0 ug/L <5.0
Other Pyrene 5.0 ug/L <5.0
Target PAH Benzo(a)anthracene 1.0 ug/L <1.0
Analytes Chrysene 2.0 ug/L <2.0
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.0 ug/L <1.0
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1.0 ug/L <1.0
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.2 ug/L <0.2
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.5 ug/L <0.5
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.5 ug/L <0.5
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 5.0 ug/L <5.0
C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons' 200 ug/L <200
C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons' 200 u /L <200
Cl1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons"' 150 u /L <150
Aliphatic Surrogate%Recovery 67
Aromatic Surrogate%Recovery 67
Sam le Surro ate Acce tance Ram 4e 40-140%
Fractionation Surrogate%Recovery 88
Fractionation Surrogate%Recovery 80
Fractionation Surro ate Acce tance Ram 4e 40-140%
'Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range
2CI I-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH Analytes
CERTIFICATION
Were all QA/QC procedures REQUIRED by the EPH Method followed? X Yes _ No-Details Attached
Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? X Yes _ No-Details Attached
Were any significant modifications made to the EPH method,as specified in Section 11.3? X No _ Yes-Details Attached
I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for
obtaining the information,the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete.
SIGNATURE: u POSITION: Laboratory Director
PRINTED NAME: Richard Warila DATE: 1/17/2013
Page 6 of 18
APPENDIX 3: REQUIRED EPH DATA REPORTING FORMATANFORMATION
SAMPLE INFORMATION
Matrix X Aqueous Soil Sediment Other:
Containers Satisfactory Broken Leaking:
Aqueous Preservatives N/A pH<2 pH>2 Comment:
Temperature Received on Ice Received at 4°C Other:
Extraction Method Water: Separatory Funnel Soil: N/A
EPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Method for Ranges:MADEP EPH 04-1.1 Client ID Method Blank
Method for Target Analytes: Lab ID ZOI I I-18
EPH Surrogate Standards Date Collected NA
Aliphatic: Chlorooctadecane Date Received NA
Aromatic: o-Terphenyl Date Extracted 1/15/13
EPH Fractionation Surrogates Date Analyzed 1/15/13
2-Fluorobiphenyl Dilution Factor 1X
2-Bromonaphthalene %Moisture(soil) N/A
RANGE/TARGET ANALYTE RL Units
Unadjusted Cl 1-C22 Aromatics' 150 ug/L <150
Naphthalene 1.0 ug/L <1.0
Diesel PAH 2-Methylnaphthalene 1.0 ug/L <1.0
Analytes Phenanthrene 1.0 ug/L <1.0
Acenaphthene 5.0 ug/L <5.0
Acenaphthylene 1.0 ug/L <1.0
Fluorene 5.0 ug/L <5.0
Anthracene 5.0 ug/L <5.0
Fluoranthene 5.0 ug/L <5.0
Other Pyrene 5.0 ug/L <5.0
Target PAH Benzo(a)anthracene 1.0 ug/L <1.0
Analytes Chrysene 2.0 ug/L <2.0
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.0 ug/L <1.0
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1.0 ug/L <1.0
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.2 ug/L <0.2
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.5 ug/L <0.5
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.5 ug/L <0.5
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 5.0 ug/L <5.0
C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons' 200 u /L <200
C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons' 200 u /L <200
Cl1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons"' 150 u /L <150
Aliphatic Surrogate%Recovery 68
Aromatic Surrogate%Recovery 70
Sam le Surro ate Acce tance Ram 4e 40-140%
Fractionation Surrogate%Recovery 74
Fractionation Surrogate%Recovery 63
Fractionation Surro ate Acce tance Ram 4e 40-140%
'Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range
2CI I-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH Analytes
CERTIFICATION
Were all QA/QC procedures REQUIRED by the EPH Method followed? X Yes _ No-Details Attached
Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? X Yes _ No-Details Attached
Were any significant modifications made to the EPH method,as specified in Section 11.3? X No _ Yes-Details Attached
I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for
obtaining the information,the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete.
SIGNATURE: u POSITION: Laboratory Director
PRINTED NAME: Richard Warila DATE: 1/17/2013
Page 7 of 18
Spike Recovery and RPD Summary Report - WATER
Method C:\HPCHEM\1\METHODS\EPHALI.M (Chemstation Integrator)
Title
Last update Fri Dec 07 08:47:14 2012
Response via Initial Calibration
Non-Spiked Sample: 7011502.D
spike spike
Sample Duplicate Sample
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
File ID 7011503.D 1 7011504.D
Sample LEW 1-15 HX I LEWD 1-15 HX
Acq Time: 15 Tan 2013 3:12 pm 1 15 Tan 2013 3:37 pm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compound Sample Spike Spike Dup Spike Dup RPD QC Limits
Conc Added Res Res %Rec %Rec RPD % Rec
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonane 1 0.0 1 40 1 15 1 15 1 39 1 38 1 1 1 25 1 30-1401
Decane 1 0.0 1 40 1 18 1 18 1 45 1 46 1 3 1 25 1 40-1401
Dodecane 1 0.0 1 40 1 22 1 23 1 55 1 56 1 2 1 25 1 40-1401
Tetradecane 1 0.0 1 40 1 25 1 27 1 62 1 68 1 9 1 25 1 40-1401
Hexadecane 1 0.0 1 40 1 33 1 35 1 81 1 87 1 7 1 25 1 40-1401
Octadecane 1 0.0 1 40 1 37 1 38 1 93 1 95 1 2 1 25 1 40-1401
Nonadecane 1 0.0 1 40 1 34 1 32 1 85 1 81 1 5 1 25 1 40-1401
Eicosane 1 0.0 1 40 1 36 1 36 I 91 I 89 1 2 1 25 1 40-1401
Docosane 1 0.0 1 40 1 36 1 35 1 89 1 86 1 3 1 25 1 40-1401
Tetracosane 1 0.0 1 40 1 35 1 34 1 87 1 84 1 3 1 25 1 40-1401
Hexacosane 1 0.0 1 40 1 35 1 34 1 88 1 85 1 4 1 25 1 40-1401
Octacosane 1 0.0 1 40 1 35 1 34 1 88 1 85 1 4 1 25 1 40-1401
Triacontane 1 0.0 1 40 1 35 1 34 1 88 1 86 1 3 1 25 1 40-1401
Hexatriacontane 1 0.0 1 40 1 35 1 35 1 87 1 87 1 1 1 25 1 40-1401
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# - Fails Limit Check
EPHALI.M Thu Tan 17 08:20:21 2013
Page 8 of 18
Spike Recovery and RPD Summary Report - WATER
Method C: \HPCHEM\1\METHODS\AROQT.M (Chemstation Integrator)
Title
Last Update Tue Jan 15 09 :45 : 13 2013
Response via Initial Calibration
Non-Spiked Sample : K011502 .D
Spike Spike
Sample Duplicate Sample
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
File ID K011503 .D K011504 .D
Sample LEW 1-15 ME LEWD 1-15 ME
Acq Time : 15 Jan 2013 3 : 30 pm 15 Jan 2013 4 : 00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compound Sample Spike Spike Dup Spike Dup RPD QC Limits
Conc Added Res Res %Rec %Rec RPD % Rec
----------------- -- ----- -- ----- ---- --- -- ----- ------- ---- -------------------
Napthalene 0 . 0 40 21 19 52 47 10 25 30-140
2-Methyl Napthalene 0 . 0 40 22 20 55 51 8 25 40-140
Acenaphthylene 0 . 0 40 22 20 55 51 7 25 40-140
Acenaphthene 0 . 0 40 22 21 56 52 7 25 40-140
Fluorene 0 . 0 40 26 28 65 69 7 25 40-140
Phenanthrene 0 . 0 40 26 30 66 76 14 25 40-140
Anthracene 0 . 0 40 25 25 63 63 1 25 40-140
Fluoranthene 0 . 0 40 38 47 96 118 21 25 40-140
Pyrene 0 . 0 40 25 26 63 65 3 25 40-140
Benzo (a) Anthracene 0 . 0 40 26 27 66 68 3 25 40-140
Chrysene 0 . 0 40 26 26 65 64 1 25 40-140
Benzo (b) Flouranthe 0 . 0 40 27 31 67 77 14 25 40-140
Benzo (k) Flouranthene 0 . 0 40 29 28 73 69 5 25 40-140
Benzo (a) Pyrene 0 . 0 40 26 26 65 64 1 25 40-140
Indeno (1, 2 , 3) Pyrene 0 . 0 40 29 28 72 69 5 25 40-140
Dibenzo (ah)Anthracen 0 . 0 40 23 22 57 55 4 25 40-140
Benzo (g, h, i) Perylene 0 . 0 40 25 25 63 62 1 25 40-140
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# - Fails Limit Check
AROQT.M Tue Jan 15 16 :28 : 00 2013
Page 9 of 18
NEB UAB
METALS RESULTS
The presence of the NETLAB LOGO in the top right corner of each page in this section indicates:
The Technical Manager of the Metals Analysis Department certifies that the results included in this
section have been reviewed and approved. Any exceptions or qualifications of substance have been
reported in the case narrative.
New England Testing Laboratory, Inc.
Page 10 of 18
NEB LIAD
METALS RESULTS
Case Number: ZO111-18
Sample ID: Catch Basin
Date collected: 01/11/13
Matrix WATER JC/RS
Sample Type: Dissolved
CAS Preparative Analytical Reporting Date
Parameter Number Method Method Result Limit Units Analyzed
Arsenic 7440-38-2 3005A 6010C ND 0.01 mg/l 1/15/13
Barium 7440-39-3 3005A 6010C 0.190 0.005 mg/l 1/15/13
Beryllium 7440-41-7 3005A 6010C ND 0.005 mg/l 1/15/13
Chromium 7440-47-3 3005A 6010C ND 0.005 mg/l 1/15/13
Nickel 7440-02-0 1 3005A 6010C 0.012 0.005 1 mg/1 1/15/13
ND indicates Not Detected.
New England Testing Laboratory, Inc.
Page 11 of 18
NEB LIAD
METALS RESULTS
Sample ID: METHOD BLANK
Matrix WATER JC/RS
Sample Type: Dissolved Blank
CAS Preparative Analytical Reporting Date
Parameter Number Method Method Result Limit Units Analyzed
Arsenic 7440-38-2 3005A 6010C ND 0.01 mg/l 1/15/13
Barium 7440-39-3 3005A 6010C ND 0.005 mg/l 1/15/13
Beryllium 7440-41-7 3005A 6010C ND 0.005 mg/l 1/15/13
Chromium 7440-47-3 3005A 6010C ND 0.005 mg/l 1/15/13
Nickel 7440-02-0 1 3005A I 6010C I ND 0.005 1 mg/1 1/15/13
ND indicates Not Detected.
New England Testing Laboratory, Inc.
Page 12 of 18
NEB LIAD
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE RECOVERY
Internal
Parameter True Value Result Units Recovery, % LCL, % UCL, % Date Analyzed
Arsenic 1.00 0.99 mg/l 99 80 106 1/15/13
Barium 1.00 1.04 mg/l 104 80 111 1/15/13
Beryllium 1.00 1.10 mg/l 110 80 117 1/15/13
Chromium 1.00 1.04 mg/l 104 80 110 1/15/13
Nickel 1.00 1.02 mg/l 102 80 120 1/15/13
New England Testing Laboratory, Inc.
Page 13 of 18
RESULTS: VOLATILE PETROLEUM
HYDROCARBONS
Results for VPH analysis are presented in the following section. Each page is
electronically signed.
Page 14 of 18
SAMPLE INFORMATION
Matrix X_Aqueous _Soil _Sediment _Other:
Containers X Satisfactory _Broken _Leaking:
Aqueous N/A _pH<2 _ pH>2 Comment:
Sample Soil or _N/A —Samples NOT preserved Methanol or air-tight container mL Methanol/g soil
Preservatives Sediment _Samples rec'd in Methanol: _covering soil _not covering soil _ 1:1 +/-25%
_Samples received in air-tight container: _ Other:
Temperature i X Received on Ice X Received at 4°C Other:
VPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Method for Ranges: MADEP VPH 04-1.1 Client ID Catch Basin
Method for Target Analytes: Lab ID ZO111-18
VPH Surrogate Standards Date Collected 1/11/13
PID: 2,5-Dibromotoluene Date Received 1/11/13
FID:2,5-Dibromotoluene Date Analyzed 1/15/13
Dilution Factor 1
%Moisture(soil) NA
Range/Target Analyte Elution Range RL Units
Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics' N/A 50 ug/L 84.9
Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics' N/A 50 ug/L 51.5
Benzene C5-C8 5.0 ug/L <5.0
Ethylbenzene C9-C12 5.0 ug/L <5.0
Methyl-tert-butylether C5-C8 10 ug/L <10
Naphthalene N/A 10 ug/L <10
Toluene C5-C8 5.0 ug/L <5.0
m-&p-Xylenes C9-C12 10 ug/L <10
o-Xylene C9-C12 10 ug/L <10
C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons"' N/A 50 ug/L 84.9
C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons"' N/A 50 ug/L <50
C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' N/A 50 ug/L <50
PID Surrogate%Recovery 90%
FID Surrogate%Recovery 99%
Surrogate Acceptance Range 70-130%
'Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range
2C9-Cg Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target Analytes eluting in that range
3C-Ci2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude cone of Target Analytes eluting in that range AND concentration of C-Cio Aromatic Hydrocarbons
CERTIFICATION
Were all QA/QC procedures REQUIRED by the VPH Method followed? X Yes _ No-Details Attached
Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? X Yes _ No-Details Attached
Were any significant modifications made to the VPH method,as specified in Section 11.3? X No _ Yes-Details Attached
I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for
obtaining the information,the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete.
SIGNATURE: &A,�u� POSITION: Laboratory Director
PRINTED NAME: Richard Warila DATE: 1/17/2013
Page 15 of 18
SAMPLE INFORMATION
Matrix X_Aqueous _Soil _Sediment _Other:
Containers Satisfactory Broken Leaking:
Aqueous _N/A _pH<2 _ pH>2 Comment:
Sample Soil or _N/A —Samples NOT preserved Methanol or air-tight container mL Methanol/g soil
Preservatives Sediment _Samples rec'd in Methanol: _covering soil _not covering soil _ 1:1 +/-25%
Samples received in air-tight container: Other:
Temperature I Received on Ice Received at 4°C Other:
VPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Method for Ranges: MADEP VPH 04-1.1 Client ID Method Blank
Method for Target Analytes: Lab ID ZO111-18
VPH Surrogate Standards Date Collected NA
PID: 2,5-Dibromotoluene Date Received NA
FID:2,5-Dibromotoluene Date Analyzed 1/15/13
Dilution Factor 1
%Moisture(soil) NA
Range/Target Analyte Elution Range RL Units
Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics' N/A 50 ug/L <50
Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics' N/A 50 ug/L <50
Benzene C5-C8 5.0 ug/L <5.0
Ethylbenzene C9-C12 5.0 ug/L <5.0
Methyl-tert-butylether C5-C8 10 ug/L <10
Naphthalene N/A 10 ug/L <10
Toluene C5-C8 5.0 ug/L <5.0
m-&p-Xylenes C9-C12 10 ug/L <10
o-Xylene C9-C12 10 ug/L <10
C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons"' N/A 50 ug/L <50
C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons"' N/A 50 ug/L <50
C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons' N/A 50 ug/L <50
PID Surrogate%Recovery 89%
FID Surrogate%Recovery 100%
Surrogate Acceptance Range 70-130%
'Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range
2C5-Cg Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target Analytes eluting in that range
'Cg-Ciz Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude cone of Target Analytes eluting in that range AND concentration of Cg-Cio Aromatic Hydrocarbons
CERTIFICATION
Were all QA/QC procedures REQUIRED by the VPH Method followed? X Yes _ No-Details Attached
Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA/QC procedures achieved? X Yes _ No-Details Attached
Were any significant modifications made to the VPH method,as specified in Section 11.3? X No _ Yes-Details Attached
I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for
obtaining the information,the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete.
SIGNATURE: &Ikc�lu� POSITION: Laboratory Director
PRINTED NAME: Richard Warila DATE: 1/17/2013
Page 16 of 18
SPIKE
Spike Recovery and RPD Summary Report - WATER
Method D:\HPCHEM\1\METHODS\VPH2.M (Chemstation Integrator)
Title
Last update wed Tan 16 10:05: 38 2013
Response via Initial Calibration
Non-spiked sample: D011513.D
spike spike
Sample Duplicate Sample
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
File ID D011510.D I D011511.D
sample VLCS011513 I VLCSD011513
Acq Time: 15 Tan 113 6:47 pm 1 15 Tan 113 7: 30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compound Sample Spike Spike Dup Spike Dup RPD QC Limits
Conc Added Res Res %Rec %Rec RPD % Rec
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pentane 1 0.0 1 50 1 52 1 47 1 104 1 93 1 11 1 25 1 70-1301
2-Methyl Pentane 1 0.0 1 50 1 48 1 45 1 97 1 91 1 6 1 25 1 70-1301
2,2,4-trimethylpental 0.0 1 50 1 48 1 46 1 97 1 93 1 4 1 25 1 70-1301
Nonane 1 0.0 1 50 1 47 1 43 1 95 1 86 1 9 1 25 1 70-1301
n-decane 1 0.0 1 50 1 36 1 36 1 73 1 71 1 2 1 25 1 70-1301
n-butylcyclohexane 1 0.0 1 50 1 44 1 38 1 87 1 76 1 13 1 25 1 70-1301
MTBE #2 1 0.0 1 50 1 52 1 53 1 104 1 107 1 3 1 25 1 70-1301
Benzene #2 1 0.0 1 50 1 55 1 54 1 109 1 107 1 2 1 25 1 70-1301
Toluene #2 1 0.0 1 50 1 48 1 46 1 95 1 91 1 4 1 25 1 70-1301
Ethylbenzene #2 1 0.0 1 50 1 50 1 44 1 99 1 89 1 11 1 25 1 70-1301
M&P xylene #2 1 0.0 1 100 1 100 1 96 1 100 1 96 1 4 1 25 1 70-1301
0 xylene #2 1 0.0 1 50 1 45 1 43 1 89 1 86 1 4 1 25 1 70-1301
1,2,4-Trimethylbezenl 0.0 1 50 1 46 1 43 1 92 1 87 1 6 1 25 1 70-1301
Naphthlene #2 1 0.0 1 50 1 44 1 45 1 89 1 89 1 0 1 25 1 70-1301
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# - Fails Limit Check
VPH2.M wed Tan 16 10:09:02 2013
Page 17 of 18
NEW ENGLAND TESTING LABORATORY, INC. Vu
1254 Douglas Avenue ( �� , — I
North Providence,RI 02904 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
1-888-863-8522
PROJ.NO. PROJECC�T NAME/LOCATION
\203�0 18 ems-, (204 v� R
R
CLIENT e )�r1/Y(�' / / •fQ✓7iCn��� �+Q c EV
L�I /"J Z,tf J`i,!{S/Jt.'f' `"-�—aJ gJ Z A R Co
REPORT TO: Q S O NO. VA �� 1
INVOICE TO: E 0 H OF T
0 L R CONTAINERS I REMARKS
C
S E
DATE TIME M A SAMPLE I.D.
P B
� I 1/rw �-�,�%rte► ' �• ��, z�
tl /i:a� '�J`�' Q l�'`� • l Inc- lee
Sampled by:(Signature) Daterrime Receive by:(Signal Date/Time Laboratory Remarks: Special Instructions:
Temp.received: C List Specific Detection
Cooled O Limit Requirements:
Relinqui ed by:(Si nature) Date/Time Received by:(Signature) Date/Time
I
A�� l"!�'�'J �7 �i5S�4v�1 c-RC�4�s Inc I
it
Relinquished by:(Signature) DatelTime Received for Laboratory by:(Signature) I DatelTime
LdTurnaround(Busiffess Days)
CD "Netlab subcontracts the following tests:Radiologicals,Radon,Asbestos,UCMRs, P lorate,Bromate,Bromide,Sieve,Salmonella,Carbamates
00
0
00