Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-04-02 Planning Board Supplemental Materials (118) Eggleston Environmental 32 Old Framingham Rd Unit 29 Sudbury MA 01776 tel 508.259.1137 fax 866.820.7840 March 15, 2013 North Andover Planning Board 1600 Osgood Street North Andover, MA 01845 Attn: Judy Tymon, Town Planner RE: Stormwater Review 110 Sutton Street Dear Ms. Tymon and Board Members: Per your request, I have conducted a technical review of the March 6, 2013 drainage design packet submitted by the Neve-Morin Group in support of a Site Plan Special Permit for the above-referenced project. Included in the materials I received and reviewed were the following: § Project Report, Drainage Analysis & Riverfront Area Narrative of 110 Sutton Street, North Andover, prepared by The Neve-Morin Group, Inc. and dated March 6, 2013. § Site Plans, 110 Sutton Street, Sheets 1-4 of 4, prepared for Nancy Chippendale’s Dance Studios by The Neve-Morin Group, Inc. and dated February 15, 2013, revised through March 6, 2013. I also conducted a brief site visit on December 11, 2012 and have had several telephone conversations with Scott Cameron of Neve-Morin to discuss the project. My primary focus in this technical review is on the overall stormwater management approach and design concepts used in the project, as well as its compliance with the Town of North Andover’s zoning requirements for Site Plan Review, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Stormwater Management Standards and Regulations, and the North Andover Wetlands Bylaw. It is my understanding that, due to the proposed stormwater remediation work proposed, a Notice of Intent (NOI) application for the project has been or will be filed concurrently with the Conservation Commission. My review is aimed at assisting both the Planning Board and the Conservation Commission in their respective reviews of the project. The project site is a 1.24 acre property with an existing 6,467 sf dance studio and associated parking. Most of the site is impervious and stormwater management is presently lacking. With the exception of one roof drain, the entire property drains overland directly to the adjacent Merrimack River. Due to the slope of the property and 110 Sutton Street, Stormwater Review 2 March 15, 2013 the resultant rate of runoff flow, this has over time led to erosion of the river bank at the base of the parking lot and degradation of the riverfront area. The proposed project includes construction of a 3,796 sf addition to the existing building, in an area that is currently paved parking. The existing pavement in front of the new building will be removed and replaced with loam and seed, and roof drainage from the proposed addition will be discharged onto the new lawn area. In accordance with previous recommendations, the proposed project also includes several measures to improve the stormwater management on the existing site and prevent ongoing degradation of the riverfront area. These include two sediment forebays to capture, pretreat, and attenuate the rate of runoff from the pavement and a level spreader to disperse the discharge along the river bank. Additional improvements to provide erosion controls at the outlet of the existing 12-in roof drain and an 18-in municipal drain and compensatory flood storage are also proposed. My comments on the proposed plan are outlined below: 1. The project as currently proposed will provide significant improvement to the stormwater management on the project site in an area where it can have the most impact. While I would prefer to see the drainage from the new roof areas infiltrated directly, the proposed discharge onto a pervious surface, in conjunction with the net reduction in impervious area on the property, will provide additional recharge and an overall reduction in both the rate and volume of direct runoff from the site. More importantly, the proposed measures for handling the pavement runoff at the base of the parking area will provide some level of water quality treatment of the runoff discharged and prevent further erosion of the river bank and riverfront area. 2. The work proposed within areas subject to Conservation Commission jurisdiction under the Wetlands Protection Act and the North Andover Wetlands Bylaw is both specific to the proposed stormwater improvements and integral to achieving those improvements, and is consistent with the Stormwater Management Standards for redevelopment projects. The proposed design also meets (exceeds) the compensatory storage requirements for construction in a flood zone. 3. Construction of the stormwater management improvements should be implemented during the first phase of the proposed addition, and during a period of low flow in the Merrimack River. 4. I do recommend that a qualified engineer oversee the construction of the stormwater management system to ensure that it gets built in accordance with the plan and that the level spreader functions properly. Once built, it is important that the system be routinely inspected and maintained in accordance with the O&M plan to maximize its effectiveness and prevent failure of the system. 110 Sutton Street, Stormwater Review 3 March 15, 2013 I appreciate the opportunity to assist the North Andover Planning Board and Conservation Commission with the review of this project, and hope that this information is suitable for your needs. Please feel free to contact me if you or the applicants have any questions regarding the issues addressed herein. Sincerely, EGGLESTON ENVIRONMENTAL Lisa D. Eggleston, P.E. C: Jennifer Hughes, Conservation Coordinator