HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-07-10194
Regular NsetAng & Nearing
The BOARD OF APPWALS held their regular meeting on Monday evening, July 10,
1967 at 7:30 P.M. in the Town Office Building. The Board ia now meeting in their
new meeting roon and office in the rooms formerly occupied by the Welfare Dept.
The following members were present and voting: J~-~s A. Deyo, Ohairman$ Arthur
D _rvmm~nd, Secretary; Donald J. Scott, John J. Shields and Daniel. T. 0tLeary..
There were six people present.
1. ~W~NG: John P. Oai~
Mr. Dr~w~ond reed the legal notice.
Atty. Charles W. Trembly represented the~ petitioner, who was also present.
He stated that the two iota currently were owned by Mr. Cain and tha~ both Iota
had dwellings on them and that there was to be no new constx,,_ctio~ as a result
of the petition should it receive favorable action. The principal reason for the
petition was to create two distinct lots,, slightly c~ged as to bouadaries, such
that Mr. Cain would be able to sell one of. the lots with the buildings thereon.
To deny this petition would mean forc_Ang Mr. Cain to maintain the two dwe_l_l~s
and thu~ impose a h~dship ~pon btm which he did not west. The Awellings had bee~
in existence for many years and there would be no physical cb,~ge to the. area.
There were no objections heard. Mr. Shields mede a motion to take the petition
under advisement, Mr. 0~Leary seconded the motion and the vote was
2. PAV~.DAEES:
Mr, Pavledakes and his son Wayne were present at the request of'the Board to
discuss the garage that is presently shown on the plan. They were agreeable to
having the garage r~ved - had contemplata~ doing s~, even if the Board had not
so requested. They showed a copy of their deed to the property to the Board which
stated this land was purcb;_sed on Nove~her 13 & 24, 1~55. ~
Mr. 0'Leafy made a motion to GRA~T the variance. Nr. Drummond seconded the motion
and the vote was unanimous. The reasons for granting are:
1. Denying the petition would cause financial hardship to the petitioner.
2. Division of the lot will create two lots well in keeping with the
$1~1~4~g
neighborhood,.
3. Granting this variance would not deviate from the intent and purpose of the
-Zaw.
A condition is alee attached to the variance that no ~,t1~t,g permit may be issued
for any structure on the newly created lot u~less the e~istiug garage on the
southeast corner of the north lot has been rame~.
The Board signed the necessary plans.
A letter was received from Atty. WiLlis saying that him client wished to wait until
possibly the September meeting to appear before the Board again regarding the R. & S.
Apartments.
JOHN CAIN:
In Executive session the Board noted that the arguments presented were substantially
valid and there se~d to be no reason not to grant the variance. Atty. Trombly
July 10, 1~67 - C~nt.
agreed with the Board as to the possible confusion of the precise location of the
proposed new lot lines and said he would x,~t corrected plans to elarii~ the
situaticm. Mr. ~hields made a motion to GRAFt the petition s~BJect to clarified
plans being subaitted. Mr. OtLeary seconded the motion and the vote was ,~A~m~ua.
The reasons for granting are as foLlowal
a. To deny the applicati°n would i~pose ~essary hardship upon the applicant.
b. The proposed sulxlivision would not be evident to the .passer-by aa there would
be no physical changes to the area. i
c. Granting the variance would not deviate frcm the intant and purpose of the
Zo~ By-Laws.
A condition of approval of the petition is that clarified p?_~_~s showing t~ di~inot
lots of 4,170 ar~ 5,330 square feet be submitted to A_~t approved by the Board.
The Board voted not to have any ~eeting in August ~nlese applicati~nm ar~ reoeived
for hearings.
The ~$eting adjourned at
Chairman
Clerk