Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1954-07-26An application was received from John V~. Jackson, 595 Salem St., requesting the approval of the construction of a two c~r garage° This was advertised in the Evening Tribune on July 16, 1954. Mr. Jackson explained that there is no other suitable location for the garage, it is in ~fne with the house, there is a ledge on one side and the rear requires f~llt~g, besides the~e being no a~ess to the rear. Mr. Brassemr explained the garage would be 12~ feet from the 11ue of the adjoiniug lot, it is only a question of 2~ ft. being involved on the side line. Motion was made by Mr. Nicetta, seconded by Mr. Alvino and it was unanimously voted to take this matter under advisement. There were no objectors to this application. 'After further discussion of the above matter, a motion was made by Mr. Smith, seconded by Mr. Alvino and it was unanimously voted to grant the variance because the evidence shows that the topography of the laud will not a~lo~ the garage to be placed elsewhere in conformity with the By-LA,~. The plans were signed by the Board. Upon discussion of the application of Louise M. Campbell, a motion was made by Mr. Nicetta, seconded by ~.~. Smith and it was unanimously voted to post- pone action u~il the Board vi~ the premises; which ~_ll be on Thursday evening~ July 29, 1954 at 7:00 P.M. and will decide at that time whether or not to approve the variance. After further discussion of the application of Rose M. Clements to' operate a Rest Home, a motion was made by .Mr. Smith, seconded by Mr. Perrone and it was unanimously voted to grant a permit for a Rest Home at 812 Osgoed St., North Andover, ~dNj~t~t6 the restrictions that entrance and egress be made by wa~ of the drive leading to the home from Chadwick Stre~°~l~e-~; unless, before the renewal or successive renewal of the permit, a st or accepted wa~ is cut through the property as shown on the plan dated May, 1954 - entitled:' "Pre- liminsry Study for Development of Property ow~ed by Estate of Robert Bemis Smith - Clinton F. Good~n, Reg. Prof. Engr., M~y, 1954." The pl~us were signed by the Board. The Board then discussed the application of the Tide l~ater Associated Oil Compar~ for v~ich a P~blic Hearing was held on July 12, 1954 and which was advertised in the Evening Tribune on July 3, 1954. A motion was made by Mr. Nicetta, seconded by Mr. Alvino to grant the request for variance. Mr. Nicetta and Mr. Alvino voted in favor of the motion and Mr. Whipple, Mr. Perrone and Mr. Smith voted against the motion. The motion was defeated and the application denied. Upon motion of Mr. Smith, seconded by Mr. Perrone; Mr. Smith, Mr. Whipple and Mr. Perrone voting in favor, ~. Nicetta ~md Mr. Alvino not voting, it was voted that the following reasons be given by the Board for the denial of the petition for a variance and that the decision be filed with the Town Clerk and be sent to the interested parties: 1. A special permit was not sought no, secured by the appellant from the Board of Appeals as required under Article VI, Section II, of the Zoning By-Law. 2. In addition to the reason outl~ued above, we find that the buildiug