Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-07-20 Board of Selectmen MinutesJul~r 20, 1981 (Continued) 297 FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION: Several members of the Board commented on the excellent job the VFW did in organizeting all the July 4 activities on the Common. The Board also commanded Buddy Cyr for his work in assisting with th~ installation of the new electrical service on the Common. It was unanimously voted to send a letter to both groups thanking them for their excellent work. LICENSING COMMISSIONERS: BUCO'S TRANSFER APPLICATION: Relative to the application for a transfer of Buco's Liquor Licens_~e<~f~e Bo~,cl~oted to re-schedule the hearing for August 10. / ~ ~ The Board of Selectmen held their regular meeting on this date with all members present except Selectmen Thomas J. MeEvoy who was on vacation, and Charles A. Salisbury who had car troubles and could not make it home from work. Present were: Selectmen Ralph R. Joyce, R. Louis DiFruscio with Chairman John W. Graham presiding. The warrant was approved as submitted, and the minutes were tabled until the next meeting. POLE PETITIONS (8): The following pole petitions were approved: Pleasant St. - remove 1 pole Stevens St. - remove 2 poles Pleasant St. - remove 5 poles Boxford St. - approx. 30' of buried cable Boxford St. - 25' of conduit Farnham St. - 1 pole Farnham St. - approx. 30' of conduit Pleasant St. - remove 3 poles COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Gay-ton Osgood, Community Development Director, appeared before the Board requesting them to execute three documents. The first document was a grant agreement with HUD for a grant of $107,000 to be administered through the Merrimack Valley Planning Commission. grant was discussed at previous meetings and Gayton Osgood indicated the comments that the Board made at that time were incorporated into this new agreement. It was unanimously voted to authorize the Chairman to execute the contract with the Merrimack Valley Planning ~ Commission. The next two items concerned a Minority Business Enterprise Plan and a Section 3 Plan required by HUD for the new comprehensive grant. After some discussion, the Board voted to approve both plans. HILLSIDE ROAD AND RTE. 114: The Administrator reported that he had discussed with Sherman Eidelman, from the DPW, the status of the temporary triangle on Hillside Road. The Administrator informed Mr. Eidelman that it was the feeling of the Town that these barrels were not effective and that there were many violations occurring. Through the Administrator, Mr. Eidelman has requested the Board to consider dead-ending the short section of Hillside Road which is what the DPW originally proposed to do. The Administrator reported that if the road were going to be dead-ended, a turnaround would have to be constructed which would require the taking of a strip of ]and approximately 50' x 100'. The Administrator reported that both the Fire Chief and the Assistant Superintendent of Schools were on vacation so it was not possible to get their comments on the proposal. After much discussion and public comments, the Board voted to take the proposal under advisement. CHESTNUT STREET: The Administrator reported to the Board that the speed zone survey, which was requested, is in progress and that he had already had discussions with the representative from the DPW. It was estimated that the speed zone would take approximately 4 - 6 weeks to finalize. Relative'to the request for a "no through way" submitted by the residents of Chestnut Street the Administrator reported that he had discussions with the head of the regulations section of the DPW and also with the District Highway Engineer and both confirm that such a restriction would' not be legal. The Administrator also reported that if there was any interest on the part of the Board to consider restricting truck traffic on Chestnut Street, thai it would be possible to petition the DPW for such a restriction. However, certain requirements and warrants would have to be met and those were spelled out on the memo supplied to the Board members. At this point the Board opended up the subject for public discussion. Mr. Carey, a long-time resident, mentioned that there was alot of construction going on in that area causfng alot of trucks to use that street and indicated that the School Board did a survey and indicated that there were 15 hazard points on the street making it very dangerous to walk on the sides of the road, especially for school children. It was mentioned by a resident that there were alot of trucks on the road because of a gravel pit in the area. It was also mentioned that Chestnut Street was being used as a thru-way. People were using it as a shortcut from Boxford to Rte. 93 and that 'when school opens the traffic will increase. Mr. Herb Hayes, Chestnut St., suggested that if it were not presently legal to implement a "no though way", would it be possible, through Joe Hermann, to special l?gislation requesting authorization. Representative Hermann indicated that he could file such a local option petition with the approval of the Board of Selectmen. Mr. Hayes then